Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentzschein, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentzschein, E.
[Cancer Research 61, 3326-3329, April 15, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research

Epidemiology and Prevention

Do Urinary Estrogen Metabolites Reflect the Differences in Breast Cancer Risk between Singapore Chinese and United States African-American and White Women?1

Giske Ursin2, Melissa Wilson, Brian E. Henderson, Laurence N. Kolonel, Kristine Monroe, Hin-Peng Lee, Adeline Seow, Mimi C. Yu, Frank Z. Stanczyk and Elisabet Gentzschein

Department of Preventive Medicine [G. U., M. W., B. E. H., K. M., M. C. Y.], University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California/Los Angeles County Women’s Hospital [F. Z. S., E. G.], Los Angeles, California 90089; Cancer Etiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 [L. N. K.]; and Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597 [H-P. L., A. S.]


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Breast cancer risk is substantially lower in Singapore than in women from the United States. Part of the risk discrepancy is probably explained by differences in the production of endogenous estrogens, but differences in the pathway by which estrogen is metabolized may also play a role. We undertook a study to determine whether the ratio of urinary 2-hydroxyestrone (2OHE1):16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone (16{alpha}-OHE1) was higher in Singapore Chinese than in a group of United States (predominantly African-American) women living in Los Angeles. We also wanted to determine whether any difference in estrogen metabolite ratio between these two groups of women was greater than that in estrone (E1), estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3). The participants in this study were randomly selected healthy, non-estrogen using women participating in the Singapore Chinese Health Study (n = 67) or the Hawaii/Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort Study (n = 58). After adjusting for age and age at menopause, mean urinary 2-OHE1 was only 23% (P = 0.03) higher in Singapore Chinese than in United States women, and there were no statistically significant differences in 16{alpha}-OHE1 levels or in the ratio of 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 between the two groups. The adjusted mean 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio was 1.63 in Singapore Chinese and 1.48 in United States women (P = 0.41). In contrast, the adjusted mean values of E1, E2, and E3 were 162% (P < 0.0001), 152% (P < 0.0001), and 92% (P = 0.0009) higher, respectively, in United States women than in Singapore Chinese women. Our study suggests that urinary E1, E2, and E3 reflect the differences in breast cancer risk between Singapore Chinese and United States women to a stronger degree than the estrogen metabolites 2OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 or the ratio of 2OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ovarian hormones play an important role in breast cancer etiology. Elevated serum estrogen levels and increased urinary excretion rates of E1,3 E2, and E3 have been found in breast cancer cases as compared with controls (1) .

The extent to which E2 is metabolized via the 16{alpha}-hydroxylation pathway may also be associated with breast cancer risk. The two main pathways for metabolizing E2 are via 16{alpha}-hydroxylation and via 2-hydroxylation of E1. There are some data suggesting that 2-hydroxylated compounds are less biologically active than 16{alpha}-hydroxylated compounds (2 , 3) , and that women metabolizing more E1 through the 16{alpha} pathway may have a prolonged estrogenic effect of E1 (4 , 5) . It has therefore been suggested that the ratio of 2-hydroxylation:16{alpha}-hydroxylation is important for breast cancer development. It has also been suggested that the estrogen metabolite ratio of urinary 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 obtained from a single spot urine represents an important biomarker for breast cancer risk; the lower the ratio the higher the risk (6) . The epidemiological studies that have addressed this hypothesis are not entirely supportive (6, 7, 8) , and it has been argued that perhaps some of the discrepancy is attributable to some case-control studies measuring alterations in metabolism that occur after the onset of cancer. We therefore set out to determine whether this estrogen metabolite ratio differs in women known to be at widely different breast cancer risk.

Breast cancer incidence rates are still more than twice as high in United States women as in women living in Asia (9) . Much of this difference can be explained by differences in estrogen levels (10 , 11) between postmenopausal Asian women living in Asia and United States women living in the United States. However, it is unknown whether the average level of urinary 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 is different between these populations. We conducted a study of postmenopausal women participating in ongoing cohort studies in Los Angeles and in Singapore to determine whether there is a difference in this ratio that parallels the different breast cancer risks in these two populations.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We obtained urine samples from women who had participated in either the Los Angeles part of the Multiethnic Cohort study (12) or in the Singapore Chinese Health Study (13) . This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Southern California. The urine samples were collected as part of separate protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Southern California and at the National University of Singapore.

Multiethnic Cohort Study.
Participants for the multiethnic cohort were recruited in Hawaii and California from 1993 through 1996. In California, areas with a high population of African Americans and Latinos were targeted. Subjects were selected primarily from drivers’ license files in the two states. Additional African Americans in California were selected from the Health Care Financing Administration files. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to randomly selected persons to obtain both demographic data and information on several lifestyle factors, including diet, during the previous 12 months. A total of 215,251 male and female subjects between the ages of 45 and 75 years were included in the cohort. As part of a dietary calibration study, biological specimens were collected from 260 subjects in each ethnic/sex group. Urine samples were predominantly first-void samples. Samples were obtained in styrofoam cups, and the interviewer subsequently transferred ~45 ml to urine containers. Specimens were transported to the laboratory in a cooler containing ice or a frozen coolant, aliquoted, and stored at -20°C. Processing was conducted within 6 h of obtaining the sample.

Singapore Chinese Health Study.
Chinese men and women (n = 63,257), 45 to 74 years of age, who were residents of government housing estates (86% of the Singapore population reside in such facilities) enrolled in the study from April 1993 through December 1998. An in-person interview was conducted in the subject’s home by a trained interviewer using a structured questionnaire that included a validated dietary component soliciting intake over the previous 12 months. The questionnaire also requested demographic information, reproductive history (women only), occupational exposure, medical history, and a brief family history of cancer. Collection of blood and spot urine specimens from a random 3% sample of study enrollees began 1 year after the start of the cohort study.

The current study was based on a random sample of subjects from the Los Angeles part of the Hawaii/Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort Study (n = 71) and on the first batch of subjects from the Singapore Chinese Health Study (n = 79) who donated urine and who were postmenopausal and currently not using hormone replacement therapy.

Laboratory Analyses
Enzyme Immunoassay of 16{alpha}-OHE1 and 2-OHE1.
The urinary 16{alpha}-OHE1 and 2-OHE1 metabolites were measured at the Strang Cornell Cancer Research Laboratory in New York, NY, by Dr. Daniel Sepkovic. Commercially available monoclonal antibody-based enzyme assay kits (Estramet; Immuna Care Corporation, Bethlehem, PA) were used to measure 2-OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 directly in urine (14) The monoclonal antibodies have been tested against other estrogen and androgen metabolites with similar chemical structures and found to show high affinity and specificity for 2-OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 (14) . Results from the 2-OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 assays have been found to correlate highly (correlation coefficients for the comparisons were 0.947 and 0.936, respectively) with corresponding results from gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (15 , 16) . We used the revised version of the assay (16) . The intra-assay coefficients of variation estimated from duplicate measures of all samples were 4.8% for 2-OHE1 and 4.5% for 16{alpha}-OHE1. Between-assay CV estimated from 4 samples measured once or twice in two to six batches of samples were 20.2% for 2-OHE1, 31.3% for 16{alpha}-OHE1, 15.6% for the 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio, and 13.3% for creatinine. The inter-assay CVs for 2-OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 were somewhat higher than what has been reported previously (10% and 17%, respectively; Ref. 16 ); however, this was driven by one measurement, without which the CVs were 12% and 22%, respectively. The CV for the ratio was identical to what has been reported previously in postmenopausal women.

We submitted all of the samples in a total of 7 batches, each batch containing the same proportion of Asian and white/African American women. Because of the known problems with errors over time, the samples were run closely together in time, with 90% of the samples run during a one month period.

RIA of Urinary E1, E2, and E3.
The urinary E1, E2, and E3 metabolites were measured in the laboratory of Dr. Frank Z. Stanczyk at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center using radioimmunoassays with preceding high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassays (8 , 17) . Each sample of urine was acidified and subjected to ß-glucuronidase/aryl sulfatase hydrolysis before being subjected to chromatography and separation of E1, E2, and E3. Quality control samples were included with each set of samples assayed. The coefficients of variation (estimated from one sample estimated six times in each batch) were 17.8% for E1, 17.1% for E2, and 15.7%for E3.

Statistical Analyses.
Within the United States population, African Americans and whites have a similar 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio after weight has been taken into consideration (18) . Although African Americans have slightly lower breast cancer incidence rates than whites (19) , their rates are still twice as high as those of Chinese women in Singapore (9) . We therefore combined the data from African Americans and whites in the analyses.

We adjusted all of the hormone metabolites for creatinine excretion, logarithmically transformed the values, and evaluated the statistical significance of the difference in these variables between women from the United States (African Americans/whites) and Chinese women from Singapore using analysis of covariance (20) . We adjusted for age and age at menopause (<40, 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, or 55+) in the main analyses. In additional analyses, we also adjusted for a number of variables that are known to affect breast cancer risk and which may be associated with hormone levels: age, BMI, age at menarche (<=12, 13–14, 15+), and parity (0–1, 2–3, 4+ children). Post-menopausal status was defined as an affirmative response to the question: "Have your menstrual cycles stopped permanently?" There were 4 women from the United States and 3 women from Singapore who had undergone simple hysterectomy and were under 55 years of age. Exclusion of these subjects did not materially change any of the study results. They were therefore included in all results presented in this report. Five African American women had unknown age at menopause, and 2 African American, 1 white, 2 with mixed ethnicity, and 14 Singapore Chinese women had missing BMIs. To keep these women in the adjusted analyses, we replaced the missing values with the median age at menopause or the BMI level for each ethnic group (Singapore Chinese, African-American, or white/other). All Ps are from two-sided tests. The levels of 2-OHE1 and 16{alpha}-OHE1 were below detection levels in 12 women from the United States and in 12 women from Singapore. These women were excluded from all analyses. We also excluded one United States woman with missing information on parity. The final study sample consisted of 58 United States women and 67 Singapore Chinese women. E1, E2, or E3 levels were below detection levels for some women; these women were included in all analyses in which they had known values.


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The United States women were predominantly African American (n = 44); 7 were white, and the rest (n = 7) were mixed African American/white or African American/other. The characteristics of the women in this study are displayed in Table 1Citation . Singapore Chinese women were substantially lighter, somewhat younger, less educated, had a later menarche and menopause, and were less likely to have a family history of breast cancer than United States women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Distribution of selected characteristics among study subjects

 
Table 2Citation shows the geometric mean values of urinary estrogens in United States and Singapore Chinese women. Unadjusted mean levels of all estrogen metabolites were higher in United States than in Singapore women. Adjusted mean levels of E1, E2, and E3 were 162% (P < 0.0001), 152% (P < 0.0001), and 92% (P = 0.0009) higher, respectively, in United States than in Singapore Chinese women. However, mean 2-OHE1 was only 23% lower in United States women (P = 0.03), and there were no statistically significant differences in 16{alpha}-OHE1 or in the ratio of 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Geometric mean values (and 95% CI) of urinary metabolites in postmenopausal Singapore Chinese (n = 67) and United States African-American/White (n = 58) women (adjusted for age and age at menopause)

 
Additional adjustment for BMI, parity, and age at menarche completely obliterated any difference between the two groups with respect to 2-OHE1, whereas E1, E2, and E3 were still 167% (P = 0.0001), 136% (P = 0.0005), and 44% (P = 0.12) greater in United States women than in Singapore Chinese. Similar results were obtained when we adjusted for body weight. The results were also similar after adjustments for intake of tofu or cruciferous vegetables over the past year (data not shown). The results were essentially unchanged after excluding women who were current smokers, who were <55 years of age and had undergone a simple hysterectomy, or who reported drinking >3 alcoholic drinks/week over the past year prior to urine collection (data not shown). There were too few white women to determine differences in estrogen metabolism between the whites and the African Americans. However, excluding the whites from the analyses yielded very similar results.


   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Urinary levels of E1, E2, and E3 were all clearly higher in United States women than in Singapore Chinese. Although there was a statistically significant difference in 2-OHE1 between the two ethnic groups, this difference was much smaller than the corresponding differences for E1, E2, and E3. Also, the ratio of urinary 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 was not significantly different between the two groups.

It is theoretically possible that the low levels of estrogens in this sample of postmenopausal women resulted in substantial misclassification of 2-OHE1 and/or 16{alpha}-OHE1 so that we were unable to find a difference in the 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio between the United States and the Singapore Chinese women. However, we think this is very unlikely. We used a revised version of the 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 immunoassay that has been found to yield results that correlate highly with results obtained with gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy in postmenopausal women (15 , 16) , and the CV were reasonable and similar to those that have been reported previously.

The samples were stored at -20°C, and not at -80°C; however, it is unlikely that this affected our results. First, we observed the expected differences in E1, E2, and E3 between the two ethnic groups. Second, freeze-thaw cycles (including storage at -30°C) has not been found to affect the 2-OHE1 or 16{alpha}-OHE1 measurements (16 , 21) . Furthermore, our absolute values of estrogen metabolites were very similar to what we have observed in data from a previous study in Los Angeles where samples were stored at -80°C (8) .

Our results are consistent with previous literature on the differences in estrogen levels between postmenopausal women of different ethnicities (10 , 11 , 22) . Goldin et al. (22) found that urinary E1, E2, E3, and plasma E2 were significantly higher (2–4 times higher) among United States whites than among recent Asian immigrants to Hawaii. Shimizu et al. (10) found that United States whites living in Southern California had significantly higher serum E1 and E2 levels than women living in rural areas in Japan, even after adjusting for body weight. Key et al. (11) found that, among women 55–64 years of age, plasma levels of E2 were almost three times as high in British women as in Chinese women living in rural China. Only the study of British, Japanese, and Hawaiian-Japanese women by Hayward et al. (23) failed to find a difference in urinary levels of E1, E2, or E3 between the three ethnic groups; the reason for this is unknown.

The only other study that has compared 2- and 16{alpha}-hydroxylated estrogen metabolites in Asians and non-Asians was conducted by Adlercreutz et al. (24) , who compared 13 Asian premenopausal women (mostly Vietnamese) living in Hawaii with 12 omnivorous Finnish premenopausal women from a previous study. They found that, compared with the Asian women, the Finnish women had a higher extent of 2-hydroxylation, but a similar extent of 16{alpha}-hydroxylation. The ratio of 2-:16{alpha}-hydroxylation was four to five times higher among the Finnish women than among the Asian women.

The hypothesis that the ratio of 2-hydroxylation:16{alpha}-hydroxylation is important for breast cancer development (4 , 5) is supported by some, but not all, experimental evidence. The 2-hydroxylated compounds bind more weakly to the estrogen receptor and result in lower estrogenic effects than do the 16{alpha}-hydroxylated compounds (2 , 3) . There are experimental data showing an antiestrogen role of 2-hydroxylated compounds (25) , DNA adduct formation with 16{alpha}-hydroxylated compounds (26) , and higher levels of 16{alpha}-hydroxylated compounds in breast cancer tissue than in noncancerous tissue (27 , 28) . However, others have suggested that 2-hydroxylated estrogens, like the other catechol estrogens, the 4-hydroxylated compounds, can cause oxidative DNA damage (29) .

Results from epidemiological studies on the association between 2- and 16{alpha}- hydroxylation and breast cancer are mixed. Several (6 , 18 , 30, 31, 32) but not all (33) non-population-based studies found an increased risk of breast cancer associated with lower 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio. Thus far, there are two population-based samples addressing this question. In a study of 66 postmenopausal breast cancer cases and 76 control patients, we found no increased risk with a lower ratio of 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 (8) . Meilahn et al. (7) reported a median of 1.6 for the ratio 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 in 42 postmenopausal patients and 1.7 in 139 matched control subjects from the Guernsey III cohort follow-up. Compared with postmenopausal women in the lowest tertile category of 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1, women in the highest tertile had an odds ratio for breast cancer of 0.71, but the CI was wide and not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.29–1.75).

Apart from the last study, the other studies measured metabolites after breast cancer diagnosis. Thus, there is the possibility that the results obtained in case-control studies may have been affected by the cancer or the cancer treatment, especially in studies that have included recently diagnosed or treated breast cancer cases.

We only examined the ratio between two metabolites in the 2-hydroxylated and 16{alpha}-hydroxylated estrogen pathways. There is increasing experimental evidence that the 4-hydroxylated estrogen pathway may play a major role (29) . However, there is no readily available assay to determine 4-hydroxylated products.

A number of genetic and environmental variables seem to modify the role of these hydroxylation pathways. Smoking (34) and the intake of soy (35) up-regulate 2-hydroxylation. Also, indole-3 carbinol, which is found in cruciferous vegetables, up-regulates the 2-hydroxylation pathway and down-regulates the 4-hydroxylation pathway (36 , 37) . However, in our study, adjustment for soy consumption and cruciferous vegetable intake did not alter the results.

Adjustment for weight or BMI completely obliterated any difference in 2-OHE1 between the two groups of women, whereas the differences in E1 and E2 were still statistically significant. Previous studies have reported that weight correlated inversely with 2-hydroxylation (18 , 38) , but had no effect (38) or was positively correlated (39) with 16{alpha}-hydroxylation. To what extent lack of adequate body weight or body mass adjustment may have caused the apparent protective association between the 2-OHE1:16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio and breast cancer in previous studies is unclear. In our previous case-control study of breast cancer (8) , we restricted participants to women weighing under 200 pounds and found no association between estrogen metabolites and breast cancer risk. The confounding effects of body weight or mass need to be evaluated carefully in future studies of estrogen metabolites and breast cancer risk.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Daniel Sepkovic for conducting the 2-hydroxyestrone and 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone assays.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grants CA70684, CA53890, CA54281, and CA63464 and partly by DAMD17-94-J-4049 (to G. U.). G. U. was supported in part by a Research Career Development Award from the Stop Cancer Foundation. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 4407, Los Angeles, CA 90089. Phone: (323) 865-0423; Fax: (323) 865-0142; E-mail: gursin{at}hsc.usc.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: E1, estrone; E2, 17ß-estradiol; E3, estriol; 2-OHE1, 2-hydroxyestrone; 16{alpha}-OHE1, 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone; CV, coefficient(s) of variation; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval. Back

Received 9/ 5/00. Accepted 2/16/01.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bernstein L., Ross R. K. Endogenous hormones and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol. Rev., 15: 48-65, 1993.[Free Full Text]
  2. Fishman J., Osborne M. P., Telang N. T. The role of estrogen in mammary carcinogenesis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 768: 91-100, 1995.[Abstract]
  3. Van Aswegen C. H., Purdy R. H., Wittliff J. L. Binding of 2-hydroxyestradiol and 4-hydroxyestradiol to estrogen receptors from human breast cancers. J. Steroid Biochem., 32: 485-492, 1989.[Medline]
  4. Bradlow H. L., Hershcopf R., Martucci C., Fishman J. 16{alpha}-hydroxylation of estradiol: a possible risk marker for breast cancer. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 464: 138-151, 1986.[Abstract]
  5. Bradlow H. L., Hershcopf R. E., Fishman J. F. Oestradiol 16{alpha}-hydroxylase: a risk marker for breast cancer. Cancer Surv., 5: 574-583, 1986.
  6. Kabat G. C., Chang C. J., Sparano J. A., Sepkovic D. W., Hu X. P., Khalil A., Rosenblatt R., Bradlow H. L. Urinary estrogen metabolites and breast cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 6: 505-509, 1997.[Abstract]
  7. Meilahn E. N., De Stavola B., Allen D. S., Fentiman I., Bradlow H. L., Sepkovic D. W., Kuller D. W. Do urinary estrogen metabolites predict cancer? The Guernsey III cohort follow-up. Br. J. Cancer, 78: 1250-1255, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Ursin G., London S., Stanczyk F. Z., Gentzschein E., Paganini-Hill A., Ross R. K., Pike M. C. Urinary 2-hydroxyestrone/16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone ratio and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 1067-1072, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ferlay, J., Parkin, D. M., and Pisani, P. (eds.). GLOBOCAN: Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Cancer Base 3. Lyon, France: IARC, 1998.
  10. Shimizu H., Ross R. K., Bernstein L., Pike M. C., Henderson B. E. Serum estrogen levels in postmenopausal women: comparison of US whites and Japanese in Japan. Br. J. Cancer, 62: 451-454, 1990.[Medline]
  11. Key T. J. A., Chen J., Wang D. Y., Pike M. C., Boreham J. Sex hormones in women in rural China and in Britain. Br. J. Cancer, 62: 631-636, 1990.[Medline]
  12. Kolonel L. N., Henderson B. E., Hankin J. H., Nomura A. M., Wilkens L. R., Pike M. C., Stram D. O., Monroe K. R., Earle M. E., Nagamine F. S. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am. J. Epidemiol., 151: 346-357, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Seow A., Shi C. Y., Franke A. A., Hankin J. H., Lee H. P., Yu M. C. Isoflavonoid levels in spot urine are associated with frequency of dietary soy intake in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older Chinese in Singapore. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 7: 135-140, 1998.[Abstract]
  14. Klug T. L., Bradlow H. L., Sepkovic D. W. Monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay for simultaneous quantitation of 2- and 16 {alpha}-hydroxyestrone in urine. Steroids, 59: 648-655, 1994.[Medline]
  15. Ziegler R. G., Rossi S. C., Fears T. R., Bradlow H. L., Adlercreutz H., Sepkovic D., Kiuru P., Wahala K., Vaught J. B., Donaldson J. L., Falk R. T., Fillmore C. M., Siiteri P. K., Hoover R. N., Gail M. H. Quantifying estrogen metabolism: an evaluation of the reproducibility and validity of enzyme immunoassays for 2-hydroxyestrone and 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone in urine. Environ. Health Perspect., 105: 607-614, 1997.
  16. Falk R. T., Rossi S. C., Fears T. R., Sepkovic D. W., Migella A., Adlercreutz H., Donaldson J., Bradlow H. L., Ziegler R. G. A new ELISA kit for measuring urinary 2-hydroxyestrone, 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone, and their ratio: reproducibility, validity, and assay performance after freeze-thaw cycling and preservation by boric acid. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 81-87, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gentschein E., Ursin G., Paganini-Hill A., Ross R. K., Stanczyk F. Z. Improved method for measuring urinary estrogens in postmenopausal women by HPLC-RIA. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig., 4 (Suppl.): 385 1997.
  18. Coker A. L., Crane M. M., Sticca R. P., Sepkovic D. W. Ethnic differences in estrogen metabolism in healthy women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 89: 89-90, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  19. Ries L. A. G. Eisner M. P. Kosary C. L. Hankey B. F. Miller B. A. Clegg L. Edwards B. K. eds. . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1997, : National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD 2000.
  20. Rosner B. Ed. 3 . Fundamentals of Biostatistics, : 513-514, PWS-KENT Publishing Co. Boston 1990.
  21. Chen C., Malone K. E., Prunty J., Daling J. R. Measurement of urinary estrogen metabolites using a monoclonal enzyme-linked immunoassay kit: assay performance and feasibility for epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 5: 727-732, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Goldin B. R., Adlercreutz H., Gorbach S. L., Woods M. N., Dwyer J. T., Conlon T., Bohn E., Gershoff S. N. The relationship between estrogen levels and diets of Caucasian American and Oriental immigrant women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 44: 945-953, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hayward J. L., Grenwodd F. C., Glober G., Stemmerman G., Bulbrook R. D., Wang D. Y., Kumaokas S. Endocrine status in normal British. Japanese and Hawaiian-Japanese women. Eur. J. Cancer, 14: 1221-1228, 1978.
  24. Adlercreutz H., Gorbach S. L., Goldin B. R., Woods M. N., Dwyer J. T., Hämäläinen E. Estrogen metabolism and excretion in Oriental and Caucasian women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 1076-1082, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Schneider J., Hug M. M., Bradlow H. L., Fishman J. Antiestrogen action of 2-hydroxyestrone on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem., 259: 4840-4845, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Cavalieri E. L., Stack D. E., Devanesan P. D., Todorovic R., Dwivedy I., Higginbotham S., Johansson S. L., Patil K. D., Gross M. L., Gooden J. K., Ramanathan R., Cerny R. L., Rogan E. G. Molecular origin of cancer: catechol estrogen-3,4-quinones as endogenous tumor initiators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 10937-10942, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Osborne M. P., Bradlow H. L., Wong G. Y. C., Telang N. T. Upregulation of estradiol C16{alpha}-hydroxylation in human breast tissue: a potential biomarker of breast cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 1917-1920, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Imoto S., Mitani F., Enomoto K., Fujiwara K., Ikeda T., Kitajima M., Ishimura Y. Influence of estrogen metabolism on proliferation of human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 42: 57-64, 1997.[Medline]
  29. Yager J. D., Liehr J. G. Molecular mechanisms of estrogen carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol., 36: 203-323, 1996.[Medline]
  30. Schneider J., Kinne D., Fracchia A., Pierce V., Bradlow H. L., Fishman J. Abnormal oxidative metabolism of estradiol in women with breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79: 3047-3051, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Osborne M. P., Karmali R. A., Hershcopf R. J., Bradlow H. L., Kourides I. A., Williams W. R., Rosen P. P., Fishman J. {omega}-3 fatty acids: modulation of estrogen metabolism and potential for breast cancer prevention. Cancer Investig., 8: 629-631, 1988.
  32. Ho G. H., Luo X. W., Ji C. Y., Foo S. C., Ng E. H. Urinary 2/16 {alpha}-hydroxyestrone ratio: correlation with serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and a potential biomarker of breast cancer risk. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, 27: 294-299, 1998.[Medline]
  33. Adlercreutz H., Fotsis T., Höckerstedt K., Hämäläinen E., Bannwart C., Bloigu S., Valtonen A., Ollus A. Diet and urinary estrogen profile in premenopausal omnivorous and vegetarian women and in premenopausal women with breast cancer. J. Steroid Biochem., 34: 527-530, 1989.[Medline]
  34. Michnovicz J. J., Hershcopf R. J., Naganuma H., Bradlow H. L., Fishman J. Increased 2-hydroxylation of estradiol as a possible mechanism for the anti-estrogenic effect of cigarette smoking. N. Engl. J. Med., 315: 1305-1309, 1986.[Abstract]
  35. Lu L. J., Cree M., Josyula S., Nagamani M., Grady J. J., Anderson K. E. Increased urinary excretion of 2-hydroxyestrone but not 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone in premenopausal women during a soya diet containing isoflavones. Cancer Res., 60: 1299-1305, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Niwa T., Swaneck G., Bradlow H. L. Alterations in estradiol metabolism in MCF-7 cells induced by treatment with indole-3-carbinol and related compounds. Steroids, 59: 523-527, 1994.[Medline]
  37. Tiwari R. K., Guo L., Bradlow H. L., Telang N. T., Osborne M. P. Selective responsiveness of human breast cancer cells to indole-3-carbinol, a chemopreventive agent. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 126-131, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Schneider J., Bradlow L. H., Strain G., Levin J., Anderson K., Fishman J. Effects of obesity on estradiol metabolism: decreased formation of nonuteroteopic metabolites. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 56: 973-978, 1982.[Abstract]
  39. Snow R. C., Barbieri R. L., Frisch R. E. Estrogen 2-hydroxylase oxidation and menstrual function among elite oarswomen. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 69: 369-376, 1989.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. M. Faupel-Badger, C.-C. Hsieh, R. Troisi, P. Lagiou, and N. Potischman
Plasma Volume Expansion in Pregnancy: Implications for Biomarkers in Population Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
C. E. Wood, T. C. Register, and J.M. Cline
Soy isoflavonoid effects on endogenous estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal female monkeys
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
W.-H. Wu, L.-Y. Liu, C.-J. Chung, H.-J. Jou, and T.-A. Wang
Estrogenic Effect of Yam Ingestion in Healthy Postmenopausal Women
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 24(4): 235 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. T. Falk, T. R. Fears, X. Xu, R. N. Hoover, M. C. Pike, A. H. Wu, A. M.Y. Nomura, L. N. Kolonel, D. W. West, D. W. Sepkovic, et al.
Urinary Estrogen Metabolites and Their Ratio among Asian American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Yu, C. H. Lee, P. H. Tan, and P. Tan
Conservation of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes and Transcriptional Patterns of Tumor Progression Across Distinct Ethnic Populations
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5508 - 5517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Santoro, B. Lasley, D. McConnell, J. Allsworth, S. Crawford, E. B. Gold, J. S. Finkelstein, G. A. Greendale, J. Kelsey, S. Korenman, et al.
Body Size and Ethnicity Are Associated with Menstrual Cycle Alterations in Women in the Early Menopausal Transition: The Study of Women's Health across the Nation (SWAN) Daily Hormone Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2622 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. E Kasim-Karakas, R. U Almario, L. Gregory, H. Todd, R. Wong, and B. L Lasley
Effects of prune consumption on the ratio of 2-hydroxyestrone to 16{alpha}-hydroxyestrone
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1422 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MutagenesisHome page
E. Yared, T. J. McMillan, and F. L. Martin
Genotoxic effects of oestrogens in breast cells detected by the micronucleus assay and the Comet assay
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Brown, L. Cheng, S. Lin, and D. T. Baird
Daily Low-Dose Mifepristone Has Contraceptive Potential by Suppressing Ovulation and Menstruation: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial of 2 and 5 mg per Day for 120 Days
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentzschein, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ursin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentzschein, E.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online