| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Department of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.4-fold) or p21CIP1 (
5.5-fold). Infection of p53-/- MEFs with Ad-p53 or Ad-p21 completely protected against rapamycin-induced apoptosis. Under serum-containing conditions, rapamycin inhibited incorporation of BrdUrd significantly more in wild-type murine embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) than in those lacking p53 or p21CIP1. When BrdUrd was added 24 h after rapamycin, almost 90% and 70% of cells lacking p53 or p21CIP1, respectively, incorporated nucleoside. In contrast, only 19% of wild-type cells incorporated BrdUrd in the presence of rapamycin. Western blot analysis of cyclin levels showed that rapamycin had little effect on levels of cyclins D1 or E in any MEF strain. However, cyclin A was reduced to very low levels by rapamycin in wild-type cells, but remained high in cells lacking p53 or p21CIP1. Taken together, the data suggest that p53 cooperates in enforcing G1 cell cycle arrest, leading to a cytostatic response to rapamycin. In contrast, in tumor cells, or MEFs, having deficient p53 function the response to this agent may be cell cycle progression and apoptosis. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1520%), but results in a specific G1 cell cycle arrest. We have shown previously that rhabdomyosarcoma cells are highly sensitive to growth inhibition by rapamycin (12)
, and under serum-free conditions rapamycin induced p53-independent apoptosis (13)
.
The tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that has been found to be mutated in >50% of human cancers (14
, 15)
. In response to genotoxic damage, such as exposure to chemotherapeutic agents,
-irradiation, or UV irradiation, p53 is up-regulated (16, 17, 18)
. Up-regulation of p53 either results in arrest of cells in G1 phase and participates in DNA repair (18, 19, 20, 21)
or drives cells toward apoptosis (19
, 22
, 23)
. The functions of p53 are dependent on cell type and developmental stage (24)
, but the mechanisms by which p53 exerts its functions is still not fully understood (25)
. Many reports show that p53 functions as a tumor suppressor by promoting apoptosis (15
, 25) . On the other hand, recent studies also demonstrate that p53 may retard tumor progression by another mechanism based on irreversible growth arrest which may lead to senescence (26
, 27) .
p53-dependent cell cycle arrest is in part a consequence of up-regulation of p21CIP1, a p53-inducible gene (28, 29, 30) . p21CIP1 inhibits G1 cdk which phosphorylate pRb and related family members, leading to a G0-G1 arrest of the cell cycle (31, 32, 33, 34) . Interestingly, recent findings further reveal that p21CIP1-induced cycle arrest in G1 phase protects cells from apoptosis induced by ionizing radiation or chemical exposure (35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42) . Down-regulation of p21CIP1 using antisense oligonucleotides has also been shown to radiosensitize cells by converting growth arrest to apoptosis (43) . In contrast to the role of p53 in response to DNA damage, p53 appears also to act as a sensor, causing G1 arrest of cells prior to damage. In cells treated with the antimetabolite N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid, an inhibitor of carbamoylphosphate synthetase that depletes cellular pools of both purines and pyrimidines p53 initiates a G1 block prior to initiation of DNA replication (44 , 45) .
The observation that tumor cells with mutated p53 undergo apoptosis when exposed to rapamycin, in contrast to G1 arrest, prompted us to investigate whether p53 acted as a sensor to prevent G1 progression in drug-treated cells in which synthesis of a subset of proteins had been inhibited. Our results reveal that rapamycin-induced death is a consequence of continued cell cycle progression despite inhibition of mTOR function. The results suggest that p53 cooperates in blocking G1 progression in rapamycin-treated cells and that protection from drug-induced apoptosis requires p21CIP1.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cys220; Rh30 Arg273
Cys273) and were grown in antibiotic-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine at 37°C and 5% CO2. For experiments where cells were deprived of serum overnight, cell monolayers were washed with RPMI 1640 containing 2 mM L-glutamine and incubated in the same medium. For prolonged serum-free conditions, Rh30 cells were cultured in MN2E (DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1 µg/ml human transferrin, 30 nM sodium selenate, 20 nM progesterone, 100 µM putrescine, 30 nM vitamin E phosphate, 50 µM ethanolamine, and 1 mg/ml BSA). Rh1 cells were grown in MN2E with addition of fibronectin (10 µg/ml). Rh1 and Rh30 clones that stably express an AU-1-tagged mutant mTOR cDNA have been described previously (13)
. This mutant (designated mTOR-rr) has a single amino acid substitution (Ser2035
Ile2035) in the FKBP-rapamycin binding domain that reduces the binding affinity of the FKBP-rapamycin complex (47)
. Wild-type and p53-/- cells were obtained from Tyler Jacks (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) and used within five passages. Wild-type and p21-/- MEFs were kindly provided by Charles Sherr (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital). For prolonged serum-free conditions, cells were cultured in MN2E as described above.
Adenoviral Infections.
Replication-deficient (
E1A and E3) adenoviral recombinants (Genetic Therapy, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) expressing ß-galactosidase (Ad-ß-gal) (48)
, wild-type p53 (Ad-p53; from Linda Harris, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital), or wild-type human p21CIP1 (Ad-p21; from Wafik El-Deiry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) were prepared using 293 cells by conventional procedures. The adenoviral recombinants were titered by a plaque-forming assay after infection of 293 cells as described elsewhere (48)
. All infections were performed firstly in 2% FBS/DMEM for 2 h, then continued in 10% FBS/DMEM for 22 h. The infectivity of the cell lines was compared by infecting cells with Ad-ß-gal and then staining with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside as reported previously (48)
. The MOI was defined as the ratio of the total number of plaque-forming units used in a particular infection per total number of cells to be infected. Controls included Ad-ß-gal infection and mock infection in which the cells were incubated with corresponding medium only.
Determination of Apoptosis.
Cells (Rh1, 8.5 x 105; Rh30, 1.7 x 106/162-cm2 flask) were grown overnight in serum-free N2E medium. On day 1 rapamycin (100 ng/ml) was added, and cells were exposed for up to 6 days. Control cells in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS or N2E were grown for the corresponding periods without addition of rapamycin (100 ng/ml). Cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, resuspended in 200 µl of binding buffer (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA), and incubated with 10 µl of Annexin VFITC (final concentration 1 µg/ml; Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) and 500 ng of propidium iodide in a final volume of 410 µl. Cells were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 10 min before flow cytometric analysis (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) as described previously (13)
.
Flow Cytometry for Cell Cycle Analysis.
Cultured cells were briefly washed with PBS and trypsinized. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and pellets were resuspended in propidium iodide staining solution (50 ng/ml propidium iodide, 0.1% sodium citrate, and 0.1% Triton X-100) at 1 x 106 cells/ml. The cells were then pretreated with RNase (DNase-free) solution (0.2 mg/ml RNase in 15 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) and filtered through 40-µm diameter mesh to remove clumps of nuclei. Percentages of cells within each of the cell cycle compartments (G0-G1, S, or G2-M) were determined by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson).
Western Blot Analysis.
Cultured cells were briefly washed with cold PBS and on ice lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.2) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay using BSA as the standard (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Equivalent amounts of protein were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride; Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were blocked with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dry milk and probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-p21CIP1 (1:800; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), polyclonal anti cyclin A or E (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (1:16,000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). For detection of cyclin D1 a monoclonal antibody (1:500; PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was used, followed by goat antimouse IgG-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (1:20,000; Pierce). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using Renaissance chemiluminescence reagent (NEN; Life Science Products, Inc., Boston, MA). To check the protein loading, the immunoblots were treated with stripping solution (62.5 mM Tris buffer, pH 6.7, containing 2% SDS and 100 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) for 30 min at 50°C and reprobed with mouse monoclonal anti-ß-tubulin antibody (1:2,000; Sigma), followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-coupled rabbit antimouse IgG (1:8,000; Sigma).
BrdUrd Immunohistochemistry and DAPI Staining.
Rh30 cells (4 x 104/well) were seeded on 2-well glass chamber slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL) in 10% FCS-RPMI 1640 and infected with Ad-ß-gal or Ad-p53, followed at 24 h by treatment with or without rapamycin (100 ng/ml) in MN2E medium for 24 h. BrdUrd (20 µM; Sigma) was then added and cells were incubated for an additional 5 days. To control for potential artifactual staining of apoptotic nuclei by anti-BrdUrd antibody, aphidicolin was added to control or rapamycin-treated cells prior to addition of BrdUrd. Cells were briefly washed with PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol (in 50 mM glycine buffer, pH 2.0) for 30 min at -20°C. Incorporation of BrdUrd into nuclear DNA was detected using an immunofluorescence assay kit (Boerhinger Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After washing with PBS, slides were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd antibody containing nucleases (1:100, 66 mM Tris buffer, 0.66 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) for 30 min at 37°C, followed by washing with PBS and immunostaining with sheep antimouse IgG-FITC conjugates (1:100, diluted in PBS) for 30 min at 37°C. To visualize nuclear morphology, slides were further counterstained with DAPI (4 µg/ml in deionized water; Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature. Following a brief washing with PBS, slides were mounted in glycerol/PBS (1:1, v/v) containing 2.5% 1,4-diazabiclo-(2,2,2)octane (Sigma) and photographed by fluorescence microscopy using Insight software. Data were statistically analyzed with a two-tailed paired Students t test. The labeling index (cells stained for BrdUrd/total cells) was calculated from counting approximately 1500 cells.
In Vitro cdk Assay.
Cells were infected with adenovirus vectors expressing ß-gal, p53, or p21CIP1 for 24 h as described above, then incubated another 24 h in N2E medium with or without rapamycin (100 ng/ml). After two brief washes with cold PBS, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. The lysates were cleared of insoluble material by centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C). Protein concentration in the supernatants was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay using BSA as the standard (Pierce). Equivalent amounts of protein (300 µg/sample) were immunoprecipitated at 4°C with rabbit anti-cdk2, cdk4, or cdk6 polyclonal antibodies (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and protein A-coupled agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 4 h. The immunoprecipitates were washed twice with RIPA buffer, followed by two washes with fresh kinase buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate). Phosphorylation reactions were initiated by addition of 50 µl of kinase buffer containing 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), 20 µM ATP, and 0.5 mg of histone H1 (Sigma, for cdk2 assay) or 0.5 µg of recombinant pRb fusion protein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for cdk4 or cdk6 assay. After 30 min at 30°C, the reaction was terminated with 1 volume of ice-cold EDTA (20 mM, pH 8.0). Duplicate aliquots of the sample supernatant were spotted onto phosphocellulose paper squares (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY). The papers were immersed in 0.75% H3PO4 solution and washed for 6 x 5 min. Radioactivity incorporated into paper-bound histone or pRb was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ile2035) that has reduced binding of FKBP-rapamycin prevented growth inhibition (13)
. Consistent with these results, rapamycin (100 ng/ml) did not induce apoptosis in Rh30 and Rh1 cells expressing mutant mTOR (data not shown). These results strongly support rapamycin-induced apoptosis being mediated through its interaction with mTOR and not through inhibition of a secondary target.
Rapamycin-induced Apoptosis Is a Consequence of Continued Cell Cycle Progression.
The cytotoxic effect of rapamycin in these malignant cell lines is in contrast to most reports in which rapamycin exerts a cytostatic effect. We considered whether the cellular response to rapamycin (cytostasis or apoptosis) was determined by loss of a G1 checkpoint function. Both cell lines express mutant p53 alleles (Rh1: Tyr220
Cys220; Rh30: Arg273
Cys273) and fail to induce p21CIP1 in response to ionizing radiation (13)
, prompting us to focus on the loss of this tumor suppressor as being a common characteristic of these malignant cells. Rapamycin-mediated G1 cell cycle arrest appears to be independent of p53 (49)
, and consistent with this is the finding that both Rh1 and Rh30 cells accumulate in G1 phase in the presence of rapamycin (13)
. Conversely, we wondered whether rapamycin-induced apoptosis is a consequence of slowed, but continued progression through G1 phase in the absence of a p53-mediated checkpoint. Under serum-free conditions of culture, rapamycin (100 ng/ml, 24 h) slowed growth (
7080%) and caused a significant increase in the proportion of Rh1 and Rh30 cells in the G1 phase (Table 1)
. For Rh1, drug treatment increased the fraction of cells in G1 phase from 67 to 83%. For Rh30, the proportion of cells in G1 phase increased from 51.5 to 70.3%. However, there was no obvious change in the expression of G1 cyclins, D1, E, and A in the presence of rapamycin (Fig. 1)
. Importantly, expression of cyclin A, a marker of late G1-S phase interface was expressed at very high levels relative to cyclin D1 or cyclin E in control and rapamycin-treated cells.
|
|
2% of apoptotic cells incorporated BrdUrd into DNA when treated with aphidicolin with or without rapamycin treatment. Thus, nuclear immunostaining for BrdUrd was not an artifact of nuclear condensation, as apoptotic cells did not score positive for nucleotide incorporation in the presence of aphidicolin, a DNA polymerase inhibitor. These data strongly support the contention that apoptosis is a consequence of progression through G1 to S phase in rapamycin-treated tumor cells.
|
|
|
46%). In contrast, rapamycin induced a significant increase in the proportion of cells positive for annexin V and propidium iodide in uninfected cultures or after infection with Ad-ß-gal virus (2628% viable as judged by annexin V-negative staining and exclusion of propidium iodide). Infection of Rh30 cells with Ad-p53 did not result in any increase in cells positive for annexin V or propidium iodide, but expression of p53 completely abrogated rapamycin-induced apoptosis in these cells (93% viable).
|
|
|
|
25% of cells demonstrated morphological signs of apoptosis. Ad-p21 suppressed BrdUrd labeling (16% labeling) and protected against rapamycin-induced apoptosis. The effect of Ad-p53 was slightly greater with only 7% of cells labeling with BrdUrd over 5 days. Rapamycin did not increase levels of apoptosis over those in cultures infected with Ad-p21 or Ad-p53 alone. Taken together, these data suggest that rapamycin-induced apoptosis is a consequence of continued cell cycle progression, and that inhibiting progression by inducing a G1 block protects cells.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extending our previous findings (13)
, expression of the rapamycin-resistant Ser2035
Ile2035 mutant mTOR prevented rapamycin-induced apoptosis, strongly suggesting that apoptosis is a consequence of attenuated mTOR signaling in rapamycin-treated cells. As shown previously, within 24 h rapamycin caused an increased fraction of Rh1 and Rh30 cells to accumulate in G1 phase of the cell cycle. However, this was not associated with any detectable change in expression of cyclin D1, E, or A, which is in contrast to other reports (52, 53, 54)
. For example, rapamycin inhibits the expression of interleukin 2-dependent cyclin A and E and the activity of cyclin-A or E-associated kinases p33cdk2 and p34cdc2, causing a mid to late G1 block (52)
. In NIH3T3 cells, although rapamycin does not affect cyclin D- or E-dependent kinases, it delays the expression of cyclin A and its associated kinase activities (53)
. Furthermore, rapamycin decreases the cyclin D1 mRNA level and protein stability, resulting in inhibition of the G1 to S transition in NIH3T3 cells (54)
. It has also been shown that rapamycin induces G1 arrest, either by inhibiting cyclin E-associated kinase by preventing interleukin 2-mediated elimination of the cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 in T lymphocytes (55)
or by inhibiting pRb phosphorylation in vascular smooth muscle cells (56)
. However, we did not find any effect of rapamycin either on the levels of p21CIP1, p27Kip1, or p57Kip2 or the phosphorylation levels of pRb, p130, and p107 in the tumor cells (data not shown). Since all above-mentioned experiments were done using p53 wild-type cells, we speculated that loss of p53 function may allow rapamycin-treated cells to progress through G1 and enter S phase before initiating apoptosis. To test this, Rh30 cells were used as an experimental model, since Rh1 did not tolerate Ad-p53 infection for unknown reasons. Rh30 cells were exposed to rapamycin for 24 h to accumulate cells in G1, then exposed further to rapamycin in the presence of BrdUrd. Cells were scored for morphological signs of apoptosis and immunostained to detect BrdUrd incorporation into DNA. Virtually all (>93%) apoptotic cells were positive for BrdUrd, indicating that these cells had initiated DNA synthesis in the presence of rapamycin. In addition, when rapamycin-treated Rh30 cells were exposed continuously to BrdUrd for 5 days, almost 100% of the cells were BrdUrd labeled, suggesting that rapamycin only slowed, but could not stop cell cycle progression of the p53 mutant tumor cells.
We next determined whether enforced expression of p53 could protect Rh30 cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis. Unmanipulated cells or those infected with Ad-p53 or Ad-ß-gal were grown with or without rapamycin. After 5 days, apoptosis was determined using the ApoAlert FACS assay. Viability of control, Ad-p53-, and Ad-ß-gal- treated cultures was similar (>93%). Rapamycin induced massive apoptosis in unmanipulated cells and in those infected with Ad-ß-gal. Ad-p53 dramatically protected Rh30 cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis. Since up-regulation of p53 may drive cells to apoptosis, or protect cells from death by inducing cell cycle arrest (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) , we further investigated the mechanism by which p53 protected Rh30 cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis. Western blot analysis showed that infection of Rh30 cells with Ad-p53 induced p21CIP1 within 24 h and persisted for at least 4 days. In addition, although expression of p53 did not significantly affect levels of cyclin D1 and E and the activity of cyclin D-associated kinases cdk4 or cdk6 (data not shown), expression of p53 dramatically reduced the levels of cyclin A and cdk2 activity. This was accompanied by a sharp decrease of phosphorylation levels of pRb (data not shown). Consistently, labeling experiments revealed that only 7% of Ad-p53-infected Rh30 cells were BrdUrd positive following incubation with BrdUrd for 5 days, indicating that expression of p53 prevented the cell cycle progression. Moreover, expression of p53 resulted in G1 accumulation, and rapamycin treatment further increased the proportion of cells in G1 to 86%. Infection of Rh30 cells with control adenovirus (Ad-ß-gal) did not affect either levels of p21CIP1 and cyclin A, or cdk2 activity, or pRb phosphorylation, and did not induce G1 accumulation. Taken together, these data suggest that rapamycin-induced apoptosis is a consequence of entering S phase while mTOR activity is inhibited by rapamycin. In contrast, forced expression of p53 blocked the cell cycle progression and arrested cells in G1 phase rescuing from rapamycin-induced apoptosis.
To test whether p21CIP1 could mimic p53, Rh1 and Rh30 cells were infected with Ad-p21 adenovirus. In contrast to Ad-p53, both cell lines tolerated infection with Ad-p21 and expressed p21CIP1 at high levels. Ad-p21 infection resulted in accumulation of cells in G1 phase, significant suppression of both DNA synthesis, as determined by [3H]thymidine and BrdUrd incorporation, and cdk2 activity, causing G1 arrest. Ad-p21 completely protected both Rh1 and Rh30 cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis. These results further strengthen the conjecture that arresting cell cycle progression prevented killing by rapamycin. Conversely, continued cell cycle progression in tumor cells results in rapamycin inducing a cytotoxic response.
These results indicate that forced expression of p53or p21CIP1 can protect tumor cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis, leading to the speculation that in cells with proficient p53 the response to rapamycin may be cytostasis in G1 phase. Since tumor cells with wild-type p53 appear to have other defects in the ARF-p53-Rb pathway, we chose to examine the role of p53and p21CIP1 in MEFs having defined gene disruptions. The response of wild-type MEFs to rapamycin was dramatically different from those with disruptions of p53or p21CIP1. Rapamycin induced significant apoptosis in p53-/- and p21-/- cells, but not in wild-type cells. These results suggest that at least part of the p53 protection is mediated by p21CIP1 in MEFs treated with rapamycin. Consistent with data derived from Rh30 cells, forced expression of p53or p21CIP1 in p53-/- MEFs also protected against rapamycin cytotoxicity. The response to rapamycin under normal culture conditions (serum containing) was also different between wild-type and mutant MEFs. Rapamycin induced growth arrest in wild-type cells and reduced the BrdUrd labeling index more effectively than in p53-/- or p21-/- cells. Ninety percent of p53-/- cells incorporated BrdUrd over 5 days in the presence of rapamycin, compared to 19% in wild-type cells. Results for p21-/- were intermediate, with 70% of rapamycin-treated cells incorporating BrdUrd. However, this latter result may represent an underestimate, as many p21-/- cells in rapamycin-treated experiments became apoptotic and detached from the microscope slide. Thus, loss of p53 or p21CIP1 function decreases the ability of cells to arrest in G1 phase of the cell cycle in response to rapamycin treatment.
The results presented here support the notion that a p53-dependent event cooperates by enforcing G1 arrest in response to inhibition of cap-dependent translation caused by rapamycin. The exact mechanism by which this is accomplished is under investigation. However, potentially, loss of p53 function could provide a basis for tumor-selective cytotoxicity of agents that target mTOR. We have shown previously (13) that rapamycin-induced apoptosis can be prevented by insulin-like growth factor I, hence it remains to be determined whether the tumor millieu in situ also protects cells from rapamycin-induced apoptosis in patients treated with the rapamycin ester CCI-779 that is currently in early clinical development. As CCI-779 induced objective tumor regressions in patients enrolled in the Phase I trial (57) , it suggests that a cytotoxic response to mTOR inhibition may be achieved in some tumors. However, whether these "responsive" tumors had mutant p53 was not determined.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by USPHS Awards CA77776, CA23099, 5T32CA09346 (to L. N. L.) and Cancer Center Support Grant CA21765 from the NCI, through a grant from Wyeth-Ayerst Company, and American, Lebanese, Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC). ![]()
2 Present address: Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 605, Japan. ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: eIF-4E, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E; 4E-BP1, 4E-binding protein; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; pRb, retinoblastoma protein; MN2E, modified N2E; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MOI, multiplicity of infection; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; Ad-ß-gal, adenovirus ß-galactosidase; DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105-2794. Phone: (901) 495-3440; Fax (901) 521-1668; E-mail: peter.houghton{at}stjude.org ![]()
Received 10/12/00. Accepted 2/16/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induces the expression of p21waf-1 and arrests macrophage cell cycle preventing induction of apoptosis. Immunity, 11: 103-113, 113.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Czerninski, P. Amornphimoltham, V. Patel, A. A. Molinolo, and J. S. Gutkind Targeting Mammalian Target of Rapamycin by Rapamycin Prevents Tumor Progression in an Oral-Specific Chemical Carcinogenesis Model Cancer Prevention Research, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 27 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Amornphimoltham, K. Leelahavanichkul, A. Molinolo, V. Patel, and J. S. Gutkind Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin by Rapamycin Causes the Regression of Carcinogen-Induced Skin Tumor Lesions Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 8094 - 8101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Anthony, F. C. Zhou, T. Ogawa, C. R. Goodlett, and J. Ruiz Alcohol Exposure Alters Cell Cycle and Apoptotic Events During Early Neurulation Alcohol Alcohol., February 18, 2008; (2008) agm166v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gridelli, P. Maione, and A. Rossi The Potential Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, February 1, 2008; 13(2): 139 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Kurmasheva, J. B. Easton, and P. J. Houghton Combined Targeting of mTOR and the Insulin-like Growth Factor Pathway ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 460 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Shen, C. S. Lancaster, B. Shi, H. Guo, P. Thimmaiah, and M.-A. Bjornsti TOR Signaling Is a Determinant of Cell Survival in Response to DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2007; 27(20): 7007 - 7017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopelovich, J. R. Fay, C. C. Sigman, and J. A. Crowell The Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway as a Potential Target for Cancer Chemoprevention Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1330 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhan, J. B. Easton, S. Huang, A. Mishra, L. Xiao, E. R. Lacy, R. W. Kriwacki, and P. J. Houghton Negative Regulation of ASK1 by p21Cip1 Involves a Small Domain That Includes Serine 98 That Is Phosphorylated by ASK1 In Vivo Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(9): 3530 - 3541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wu, K. Kiguchi, T. Kawamoto, T. Ajiki, J. Traag, S. Carbajal, L. Ruffino, H. Thames, I. Wistuba, M. Thomas, et al. Therapeutic Effect of Rapamycin on Gallbladder Cancer in a Transgenic Mouse Model Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3794 - 3800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Stanford, J. W. Barrett, S. H. Nazarian, S. Werden, and G. McFadden Oncolytic Virotherapy Synergism with Signaling Inhibitors: Rapamycin Increases Myxoma Virus Tropism for Human Tumor Cells J. Virol., February 1, 2007; 81(3): 1251 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Carver and P. P. Pandolfi Mouse modeling in oncologic preclinical and translational research. Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5305 - 5311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vega, L. J. Medeiros, V. Leventaki, C. Atwell, J. H. Cho-Vega, L. Tian, F.-X. Claret, and G. Z. Rassidakis Activation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Pathway Contributes to Tumor Cell Survival in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6589 - 6597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Law, E. Forrester, A. Chytil, P. Corsino, G. Green, B. Davis, T. Rowe, and B. Law Rapamycin Disrupts Cyclin/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase/p21/Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Complexes and Cyclin D1 Reverses Rapamycin Action by Stabilizing These Complexes Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1070 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inoki, H. Ouyang, Y. Li, and K.-L. Guan Signaling by Target of Rapamycin Proteins in Cell Growth Control Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2005; 69(1): 79 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Mondesire, W. Jian, H. Zhang, J. Ensor, M.-C. Hung, G. B. Mills, and F. Meric-Bernstam Targeting Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Synergistically Enhances Chemotherapy-Induced Cytotoxicity in Breast Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 7031 - 7042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. deGraffenried, L. Fulcher, W. E. Friedrichs, V. Grunwald, R. B. Ray, and M. Hidalgo Reduced PTEN expression in breast cancer cells confers susceptibility to inhibitors of the PI3 kinase/Akt pathway Ann. Onc., October 1, 2004; 15(10): 1510 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Dutcher Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibition Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6382S - 6387S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Huang, L. Shu, J. Easton, F. C. Harwood, G. S. Germain, H. Ichijo, and P. J. Houghton Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Activates Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase 1 Signaling by Suppressing Protein Phosphatase 5 Activity J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36490 - 36496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hay and N. Sonenberg Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes & Dev., August 15, 2004; 18(16): 1926 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-C. Noh, W. H. Mondesire, J. Peng, W. Jian, H. Zhang, J. Dong, G. B. Mills, M.-C. Hung, and F. Meric-Bernstam Determinants of Rapamycin Sensitivity in Breast Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 1013 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Harris and J. C. Lawrence Jr. TOR Signaling Sci. Signal., December 9, 2003; 2003(212): re15 - re15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Decker, S. Hipp, I. Ringshausen, C. Bogner, M. Oelsner, F. Schneller, and C. Peschel Rapamycin-induced G1 arrest in cycling B-CLL cells is associated with reduced expression of cyclin D3, cyclin E, cyclin A, and survivin Blood, January 1, 2003; 101(1): 278 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Mills, Y. Lu, and E. C. Kohn Linking molecular therapeutics to molecular diagnostics: Inhibition of the FRAP/RAFT/TOR component of the PI3K pathway preferentially blocks PTEN mutant cells in vitro and in vivo PNAS, August 28, 2001; 98(18): 10031 - 10033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Podsypanina, R. T. Lee, C. Politis, I. Hennessy, A. Crane, J. Puc, M. Neshat, H. Wang, L. Yang, J. Gibbons, et al. An inhibitor of mTOR reduces neoplasia and normalizes p70/S6 kinase activity in Pten+/- mice PNAS, August 10, 2001; (2001) 171060098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Podsypanina, R. T. Lee, C. Politis, I. Hennessy, A. Crane, J. Puc, M. Neshat, H. Wang, L. Yang, J. Gibbons, et al. An inhibitor of mTOR reduces neoplasia and normalizes p70/S6 kinase activity in Pten+/- mice PNAS, August 28, 2001; 98(18): 10320 - 10325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |