Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010 Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitahara, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitahara, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, T.
[Cancer Research 61, 3544-3549, May 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research

Advances in Brief

Alterations of Gene Expression during Colorectal Carcinogenesis Revealed by cDNA Microarrays after Laser-Capture Microdissection of Tumor Tissues and Normal Epithelia1

Osamu Kitahara, Yoichi Furukawa, Toshihiro Tanaka2, Chikashi Kihara, Kenji Ono, Renpei Yanagawa, Marcelo E. Nita, Toshihisa Takagi, Yusuke Nakamura and Tatsuhiko Tsunoda2,,3

Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
To identify a set of genes involved in the development of colorectal carcinogenesis, we compared expression profiles of colorectal cancer cells from eight tumors with corresponding noncancerous colonic epithelia using a DNA microarray consisting of 9216 human genes. These cell populations had been rendered homogeneous by laser-capture microdissection. Expression change in more than half of the tumors was observed for 235 genes, i.e., 44 up-regulated and 191 down-regulated genes. The differentially expressed genes include those associated with signal transduction, metabolizing enzymes, production of reactive oxygen species, cell cycle, transcription, mitosis, and apoptosis. Subsequent examination of 10 genes (five up-regulated and five down-regulated) by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR using the eight tumors together with an additional 12 samples substantiated the reliability of our analysis. The extensive list of genes identified in these experiments provides a large body of potentially valuable information of colorectal carcinogenesis and represents a source of novel targets for cancer therapy.


   Introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common types of cancer in developed countries. Despite several advances in treatment, this disease remains a threat to life for a large number of people. Clinical trials of new chemotherapeutic agents are ongoing, and drug effectiveness is improving; however, a complete cure for patients with advanced colorectal cancer awaits new targets and strategies. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of colorectal carcinogenesis will be essential.

Those mechanisms have been under intensive study for the last two decades. At the molecular level, activation of oncogenes (1) and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (2, 3, 4) are processes known to be involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. Additionally, abrogation of mismatch repair systems (5 , 6) contributes to some colorectal cancers. Nevertheless, exactly how those genetic alterations bring about the development and progression of colorectal carcinomas remains to be resolved. To complicate the picture, accumulations of mutant genes in neoplasms tend to be accompanied by other genetic and epigenetic changes including loss of heterozygosity, inactivation of important genes by methylation (7) or loss of imprinting (8) , and/or gene amplifications, all of which can alter gene expression profiles. Therefore, genome-wide monitoring of gene expression is of great importance if we are to disclose the numerous and diverse events associated with carcinogenesis.

Several approaches, e.g., differential hybridization, subtractive hybridization, and differential display, have been developed to identify genes that are expressed differently between normal and cancerous tissues. Zhang et al. (9) have contributed a method called serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) to examine the frequency of individual transcripts using sequencing tags corresponding to specific genes, a method that enables us to analyze expression profiles in various tissues. However, because all of these methods are labor intensive and time consuming and require large amounts of mRNA, it is difficult to apply them for analysis of thousands of genes in a limited amount of clinical material.

Hence, we have recruited a newly developed technique, the cDNA microarray, that provides high-throughput analysis of expression profiles by means of small-array slides spotted with cDNAs (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . To detect exact differences between cancerous cells and noncancerous cells, we first separated them by means of LCM (17, 18, 19) .4 Then, after performing T7-based RNA amplification (19) , we were able to compare gene expression profiles of colorectal cancer cells with those of normal colonic epithelium using our original cDNA-microarray slides containing 9216 human cDNA fragments.

In this study, we report detection of 235 genes the expression of which was changed during development or progression of colorectal cancer. Among them, 44 showed up-regulated expression and 191 showed down-regulated expression in cancer tissues compared with noncancerous tissues. These results not only disclose the complex nature of changes in genetic activity during colorectal carcinogenesis but also provide information that should prove useful for identifying novel therapeutic targets.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Microarray Design and Production.
We selected 9216 independent cDNAs including 4220 genes of known function from the UniGene database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Our cDNA microarray was constructed essentially as described previously (20) .

Tissue Samples and Laser-Capture Microdissection.
Colorectal cancer tissues and their corresponding normal mucosae were obtained with informed consent from 20 patients who underwent colectomy. Eight of these samples were embedded in TissueTek OCT medium (Sakura, Tokyo, Japan) and snap frozen at -80°C. The frozen sections were then fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 s and stained with H&E, followed by three dehydration steps of 5 s each in 70%, 95%, and 99.5% ethanol and a final 5-min dehydration in xylene. Once air-dried, the stained tissues were laser-capture microdissected by a PixCell II LCM system following the manufacturer’s protocols (Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA). Normal colonic epithelial cells and carcinoma cells selectively "laser captured" (~1 x 104 cells from each sample) were estimated to be >95% homogeneous as determined by microscopic visualization (Fig. 1)Citation .



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Separation of cells from noncancerous and cancerous tissues by LCM. Sections (9 µm) were stained with H&E. A, normal tissue; B, carcinoma tissue from the same patient; C, captured normal cells; D, captured carcinoma cells.

 
RNA Extraction, T7-based RNA Amplification, and Hybridization.
Total RNAs were extracted from each sample of laser-captured cells into 350 µl of RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extracted RNAs were treated for 1.5 h at 37°C with 10 units of DNase I (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in the presence of 1 unit of RNase inhibitor (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) to remove any contaminating genomic DNA. After inactivation at 70°C for 10 min, the RNAs were purified with an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. All of the DNase I-treated RNAs were subjected to T7-based RNA amplification as described previously (19) . Three rounds of amplification yielded 8–40 µg of aRNA from each sample. A 2.5-µg aliquot of aRNA from carcinoma and that from normal colonic mucosae were labeled with Cy3-dCTP or Cy5-dCTP, respectively, by a protocol described elsewhere (20) . The hybridization, washing, and scanning were carried out according to the methods described previously (20) .

Data Analysis.
Signal intensities of Cy3 and Cy5 from the 9216 spots were quantified and analyzed by substituting backgrounds, using ArrayVision software (Imaging Research, Inc., St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). Subsequently, each signal was normalized so that the averaged ratio (Cy3:Cy5) of the 52 housekeeping gene signals would be 1.0, and the value of root (Cy32 + Cy52) of each signal would be kept through the normalization. The 52 housekeeping genes were referred from "housekeeping panel" in the web site provided by Brown et al.5 Because the data were unreliable for spots with intensities below 1 x 105 relative fluorescent unit for both Cy3 and Cy5 signals, genes corresponding to those spots were not investigated any further.

Selection of Genes with Different Expression.
To estimate the range of Cy3:Cy5 ratio within which the expression change could be considered as fluctuation among noncancerous cells, we first compared expression levels of each gene between noncancerous cells from different parts of the same patient. The range was determined to exclude 10% of the cases from each side (significance level {alpha} = 0.10). When we compared the gene expression profiles between carcinoma cells and noncancerous cells, we considered genes that had a Cy3:Cy5 ratio outside this range as candidates of differentially expressed genes, up-regulated genes as those with Cy3:Cy5 >= upper limit, and down-regulated genes as those with Cy3:Cy5 <= lower limit. Among these candidates, genes with elevated expression in more than half the patients were selected as frequently up-regulated genes, and those with down-regulated expression in more than half the patients were selected as frequently down-regulated genes. We evaluated the significance of altered expression of the selected genes by calculating the Ps using a permutation test to analyze whether the change of expression profile is significant or not (21) . Here, we carried out a matched pair permutation between carcinoma cells and noncancerous cells for each patient because we compared those two populations in our experiment. When the samples of a patient (defined as i) were not permuted, we defined xi as the expression level of carcinoma cells and yi as the expression level of noncancerous cells from patient i. When the samples of a patient i were not permuted, we defined xi as the expression level of noncancerous cells and yi as the expression level of carcinoma cells from patient i. Because the permuted state of each patient is binary (permuted or not), we examined 28 = 256 permuted cases. In each case, difference of expression di = xi - yi (i = 1... 8) of each gene was calculated. The average of difference u = {Sigma}di/8 and SD were determined. We calculated the "signal-to-noise" ratio (21) defined as Z = u/SD for each case (among 256) for each gene (among 9216), which resulted in a total set of n = (256 x 9216) of Z-values. We estimated the probability, P, of a given expression pattern of an up-regulated gene from the eight patients by dividing by n the number of cases that showed Z-values greater than the calculated Z-value of the pattern. Similarly, we estimated the P of a given expression pattern of a down-regulated gene by dividing by n the number of cases that showed Z-values smaller than the calculated Z-value.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR.
Total RNA (5 µg) was treated with DNase I (Roche) and reversely transcribed for single-stranded cDNAs using oligo(dT)12–18 primer with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). Each single-stranded cDNA was diluted for subsequent PCR amplification by monitoring HRS as a quantitative control. HRS showed the smallest Cy3/Cy5 fluctuation among the 52 housekeeping genes in the eight experiments. Each PCR was carried out in a 50-µl volume of 1 x PCR buffer for 5 min at 95°C for initial denaturing, followed by 25–35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, in the GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequences of the primers used for RT-PCR were as follows: AI081175 forward, 5'-CCCGTTTTTCCTGTATTATCTGT-3', reverse, 5'-CTCTTCTTGAACTGGTGCTGTCT-3'; M77349 forward, 5'-GCTGGAGAAATGGCATCATTATA-3', reverse, 5'-ACACCATGGCTCTGTCACAATAG-3'; U81375 forward, 5'-TTTTCCATGTCCCCCTCCCAACT-3', reverse, 5'-AGGCACCTGGTTTCTGTCAAATA-3'; U31511 forward, 5'-AGTGACCACCAGGAGGTGCTATC-3', reverse, 5'-AATCATACAGGGAAGACCCAAGT-3'; X75208 forward, 5'-ACAACCTTCACGACAGTTGGTG-3', reverse, CTTATTGCCTTTATTCTGCTGTCG-3'; M33987 forward, 5'-CACAATTCCGCAGCCTTCTATCA-3', reverse, 5'-TGTGTTCTTGAGGAAGGACAAGT-3'; M10617 forward, 5'-CTCTATTGCCACCATGAGTTTCT-3', reverse, 5'-AGTTCGGTCACAGACTTGATGTT-3'; U37518 forward, 5'-AGTGACCAACATAGTGAAACCCC-3', reverse, 5'-GAGTGTAGTGGCATGATCTCACC-3'; AA524144 forward, 5'-TGTCTTTCAAACTCCAAGGTTCC-3', reverse, 5'-TATACAAAGTCCAAACAGCCAGG-3'; AF029082 forward, 5'-GTATTGAGCAGAAAAGCAACGAG-3', reverse, 5'-TGAGTGTCACAGGGGAACTTTAT-3'; control (HRS) forward, 5'-CAGCGGAAGACCTGAAGAGTGG-3', reverse, 5'-GAGGCATTTTATTGGACCTTTG-3'.


   Results
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
A set of microarrays containing 9216 human cDNAs in duplicate was hybridized with a mixture of Cy3-labeled cDNA probes corresponding to cancerous cells and Cy5-labeled cDNA probes corresponding to noncancerous epithelial cells. To identify genes with significantly different expression between carcinoma cells and noncancerous epithelial cells, rational Cy3/Cy5 cutoff values were determined (see "Material and Methods"). The number of genes categorized into these three groups and the number of genes under threshold signal intensities in each sample is summarized in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 The number of genes that showed increased, decreased, and unchanged expression

 
Because advanced colorectal cancers show a diversity of expression profiles, we examined the ratios in all of the eight pairs of clinical materials. Genes with changed expression in more than half (5 of 8) cases were defined as the commonly up-regulated or down-regulated genes. As a result, 44 genes fell into the group of commonly up-regulated genes (Fig. 2A)Citation , whereas 191 genes fell into the group of commonly down-regulated genes (Fig. 2B)Citation . We also calculated P for each gene using a permutation test (see "Material and Methods").



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. A, representative list of up-regulated genes in colorectal carcinoma cells. The 44 genes showing up-regulated expression in five or more of eight tumors are listed. Genes in bold type were confirmed by RT-PCR. The numbers in the frequency column show the number of cases in eight patients. In the bottom diagram, {alpha} indicates significance level. P assigned with each gene was calculated using permutation test (as described in "Materials and Methods"). B, representative list of down-regulated genes in colorectal carcinoma cells. The 85 genes showing down-regulated expression in six or more of eight tumors are listed. Genes in bold type were confirmed by RT-PCR. The numbers in the frequency column show the number of cases in eight patients. In the bottom diagram, {alpha} indicates significance level. P assigned with each gene was calculated using permutation test (as described in "Materials and Methods").

 


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2A. Continued.

 
To examine the reliability of our microarray data, we selected five up-regulated genes (TGFBI, IFITMI, SLC29A1, NOS2A, and EPHB3) and five down-regulated genes (CA1, MXI1, SFN, FABP1, and TNFSF20) and examined their expression levels by semiquantitative RT-PCR using the same aRNA samples that had served for the microarray analysis. The results of RT-PCR were consistent with microarray data in 64 of the 74 experiments. Therefore, we estimated the concordance between the microarray data and the RT-PCR data to be 86.5% (data not shown).

Furthermore, altered expression of these genes was tested using unamplified RNAs from an additional 12 cases (Fig. 3)Citation . The sample pairs that showed tumor:normal PCR products ratio detected by densitometry of more than 1.5 or less than 0.67 were considered to be changed. The five up-regulated genes showed elevated expression in 10, 11, 10, 10, and 12 cancers of the 12 cases, respectively. On the other hand, the five down-regulated genes showed reduced expression in 10, 8, 8, 12, and 8 cancers of the 12 cases, respectively. These data verified the reliability and rationality of our strategy to identify genes that are commonly involved in the development and progression of colorectal cancer.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Semiquantitative RT-PCR using RNAs from 12 newly obtained pairs of colorectal cancer cells and corresponding noncancerous colonic epithelial cells. HRS served as an internal control for each reaction. a, genes with up-regulated expression; b, genes with down-regulated expression; N, noncancerous colonic epithelial cells; T, colorectal cancer cells.

 

   Discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
REFERENCES
 
To obtain exact information about differences in gene expression profiles between cells of normal colonic mucosa and colorectal cancer cells, one must have pure populations of each type of cell. LCM is a powerful way to extract desired cells selectively from tissue specimens. When combined with this technique, microarray analysis enabled effective identification of genes, the expression of which is (or can be) changed during colorectal carcinogenesis.

Among the genes listed in Fig. 2, ACitation and BCitation , differential expression of the transforming growth factor-ß induced Mr 68,000 gene (TGFBI; GenBank accession no. M77349), the carbonic anhydrase I gene (CA1; GenBank accession no. M33987), the carbonic anhydrase II gene (CA2; GenBank accession no. J03037), and the cytokeratin 20 gene (KRT20; GenBank accession no. X73502) had been noted before between normal colonic mucosa and colorectal cancers (9) . Because TGFBI, isolated from a human lung-adenocarcinoma cell line A549 (22) , has a recognition site for integrin, the gene product would represent a key molecule for adhesion and migration of malignant cells once a cancer has developed. The CA1, on the other hand, is expressed in normal colonic mucosa, but its reduced expression correlates with vascular invasion and poor prognosis of colorectal cancers (23) .

Other genes listed in Fig. 2BCitation include 14-3-3{sigma} gene (SFN; AF029082), which is regulated by p53. 14-3-3{sigma} is known to promote premitotic cell-cycle arrest after DNA damage (24) . Because this gene is one of the targets of p53, a gene that is frequently mutated in colorectal carcinomas, reduced expression of SFN in the cancer tissues studied here may have resulted from mutations of p53.

Among other genes in the list of those showing up-regulated expression in colorectal carcinoma cells, we note the presence of equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 (ENT1) gene (SLC29A1; U81375), M-phase inducer phosphatase 2 gene (CDC25B; M81934), nitric oxide synthase 2A gene (NOS2A; U31511), and nucleolin gene (NCL; M60858). In highly proliferative cancer cells, ENT1 may help to supply nucleotides required for constitutive DNA synthesis (25) . The CDC25B protein is required for progression of the cell cycle (G2-M phase transition) by dephosphorylating Tyr15 of cell division cycle 2 (CDC2) (26 , 27) . The transcript of NOS2A, when induced by various stimuli, causes production of nitric oxide, which may be involved in DNA damage as well as several kinds of signal transduction (28) . Nucleolin induces chromatin decondensation by binding to histone H1 (29) . The enhanced expression of these genes may have a direct or indirect role in the mechanisms of colorectal carcinogenesis including accelerated metabolisms, impaired regulation of cell cycle, production of reactive oxygen species, and dysregulated transcription and mitosis.

Genes showing down-regulated expression in colorectal carcinoma cells include the MXI1 gene (MXI1; AA524144), a member of the c-Myc family, and several apoptosis-related genes: TRAIL receptor 2 gene (TNFRSF10B; AF016266), a receptor of TRAIL, TRAIL gene (TNFSF10; U37518), herpes virus entry mediator ligand gene (TNFSF14; AF064090), which are members of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, and Mch4 gene (CASP10; U60519), an activator of other caspases including caspase-3 and caspase-7 (30) . The transcript of MXI1 is a putative tumor suppressor (31) , because it negatively regulates the action of c-Myc, an oncogene that activates transcription and stimulates cell proliferation. Therefore, inactivation or suppression of MXI1 might promote malignant transformation and proliferation of affected cells. Because TRAIL receptor 2 induces apoptosis as a consequence of activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase (32) , its reduced expression in colon cancers may prolong the survival of tumor cells. From the investigation of differently expressed genes in the hepatocarcinogenesis by microarray, we also found the expression of TRAIL receptor 2 was reduced in 10 hepatocellular carcinomas among 20 (data not shown). Therefore, escaping from the apoptosis signal may be a crucial step for carcinogenesis in various organs.

Our data provide not only new information about cancer-related genes but also a new correlation of known genes with carcinogenesis. We were even able to identify a relationship to cancer among some genes, the functions of which had not yet been characterized. These results not only disclose the complex nature of changes in genetic activity during colorectal carcinogenesis but also provide information that may prove useful for identifying novel therapeutic targets.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Hideaki Ogasawara, Dr. Jun-ichi Okutsu, Dr. Hitoshi Zenbutsu, Dr. Norihiko Shiraishi, Hiroko Bando, Noriko Nemoto, and Noriko Sudo for the fabrication of cDNA microarray, and we thank Dr. Meiko Takahashi for preparation of the manuscript.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by Research for the Future Program Grant #96L00102 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Back

2 Present address: SNP Research Center, RIKEN, Inside Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan. Phone: 81-3-5449-5768; Fax: 81-3-5449-5568; E-mail: tatsu{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp Back

4 The abbreviations used are: LCM, laser-capture microdissection; aRNA, amplified RNA; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; HRS, histidyl-tRNA synthetase; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Back

5 http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/DIR/LCG/ARRAY/expn.html. Back

Received 5/31/00. Accepted 3/13/01.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Forrester K., Almoguera C., Han K., Grizzle W. E., Perucho M. Detection of high incidence of K-ras oncogenes during human colon tumorigenesis. Nature (Lond.), 327: 298-303, 1987.[Medline]
  2. Baker S. J., Fearon E. R., Nigro J. M., Hamilton S. R., Preisinger A. C., Jessup J. M., vanTuinen P., Ledbetter D. H., Barker D. F., Nakamura Y., White R., Vogelstein B. Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science (Wash. DC), 244: 217-221, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Fearon E. R., Cho K. R., Nigro J. M., Kern S. E., Simons J. W., Ruppert J. M., Hamilton S. R., Preisinger A. C., Thomas G., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Identification of chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. Science (Wash. DC), 247: 49-56, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Nishisho I., Nakamura Y., Miyoshi Y., Miki Y., Ando H., Horii A., Koyama K., Utsunomiya J., Baba S., Hedge P. Mutation of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science (Wash. DC), 253: 665-669, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ionov Y., Peinado M. A., Malkhosyan S., Shibata D., Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature (Lond.), 363: 558-561, 1993.[Medline]
  6. Thibodeau S. N., Bren G., Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science (Wash. DC), 260: 816-819, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jones P. A., Laird P. W. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat. Genet., 21: 163-167, 1999.[Medline]
  8. Cui H., Horon I. L., Ohlsson R., Hamilton S. R., Feinberg A. P. Loss of imprinting in normal tissue of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability. Nat. Med., 4: 1276-1280, 1998.[Medline]
  9. Zhang L., Zhou W., Velculescu V. E., Kern S. E., Hruban R. H., Hamilton S. R., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K. W. Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science (Wash. DC), 276: 1268-1272, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R. W., Brown P. O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science (Wash. DC), 270: 467-470, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. DeRisi J., Penland L., Brown P. O., Bittner M. L., Meltzer P. S., Ray M., Chen Y., Su Y. A., Trent J. M. Use of a cDNA microarray to analyze gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat. Genet., 14: 457-460, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Schena M., Shalon D., Heller R., Chai A., Brown P. O., Davis R. W. Parallel human genome analysis: microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 10614-10619, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wang K., Gan L., Jeffery E., Gayle M., Gown A. M., Skelly M., Nelson P. S., Ng W. V., Schummer M., Hood L., Mulligan J. Monitoring gene expression profile changes in ovarian carcinomas using cDNA microarray. Gene (Amst.), 229: 101-108, 1999.[Medline]
  14. Backert S., Gelos M., Kobalz U., Hanski M. L., Bohm C., Mann B., Lovin N., Gratchev A., Mansmann U., Moyer M. P., Riecken E. O., Hanski C. Differential gene expression in colon carcinoma cells and tissues detected with a cDNA array. Int. J. Cancer, 82: 868-874, 1999.[Medline]
  15. Sgroi C. D., Teng S., Robinson G., LeVangie R., Hudson J. R., Jr., Elkahloun A. G. In vivo gene expression profile analysis of human breast cancer progression. Cancer Res., 59: 5656-5661, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Allzadeh A. A., Eisen M. B., Davis R. E., Ma C., Lossos I. S., Rosenwald A., Boldrick J. C., Sabet H., Tran T., Yu X., Powell J. I., Yang L., Marti G. E., Moore T., Hudson J., Jr., Lu L., Lewis D. B., Tibshirani R., Sherlock G., Chan W. C., Greiner T. C., Weisenburger D. D., Armitage J. O., Warnke R., Levy R., Wilson W., Grever M. R., Byrd J. C., Botstein D., Brown P. O., Staudt L. M. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature (Lond.), 403: 503-511, 2000.[Medline]
  17. Emmert-Buck M. R., Bonner R. F., Smith P. D., Chuaqui R. F., Zhuang Z., Goldstein S. R., Weiss R. A., Liotta L. A. Laser capture micro-dissection. Science (Wash. DC), 274: 998-1001, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bonner R. F., Emmert-Buck M., Cole K., Pohida T., Chuaqui R., Goldstein S., Liotta L. A. Laser capture dissection: molecular analysis of tissue. Science (Wash. DC), 278: 1481-1482, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  19. Luo L., Salunga R. C., Guo H., Bittner A., Joy K. C., Galindo J. E., Xiao H., Rogers K. E., Wan J. S., Jackson M. R., Erlander M. G. Gene expression profiles of laser-captured adjacent neuronal subtypes. Nat. Med., 5: 117-122, 1999.[Medline]
  20. Ono K., Tanaka T., Tsunoda T., Kitahara O., Kihara C., Okamoto A., Ochiai K., Takagi T., Nakamura Y. Identification by cDNA microarray of genes involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 60: 5007-5011, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Golub T. R., Slonim D. K., Tamayo P., Huard C., Gaasenbeek M., Mesirov J. P., Coller H., Loh M. L., Downing J. R., Caligiuri M. A., Bloomfield C. D., Lander E. S. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science (Wash. DC), 286: 531-537, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Skonier J., Neubauer M., Madisen L., Bennett K., Plowman G. D., Purchio A. F. cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of ß ig-h3, a novel gene induced in a human adenocarcinoma cell line after treatment with transforming growth factor-ß. DNA Cell Biol., 11: 511-522, 1992.[Medline]
  23. Mori M., Staniunas R. J., Barnard G. F., Jessup J. M., Steele G. D., Jr., Chen L. B. The significance of carbonic anhydrase expression in human colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology, 103: 820-826, 1993.
  24. Hermeking H., Lengauer C., Polyak K., He T. C., Zhang L., Thiagalingam S., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. 14-3-3{sigma} is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression. Mol. Cell, 1: 3-11, 1997.[Medline]
  25. Cass C. E., Young J. D., Baldwin S. A. Recent advances in the molecular biology of nucleoside transporters of mammalian cells. Biochem. Cell Biol., 76: 761-770, 1998.[Medline]
  26. De Souza C. P., Ellem K. A., Gabrielli B. G. Centrosomal and cytoplasmic Cdc2/cyclin B1 activation precedes nuclear mitotic events. Exp. Cell Res., 257: 11-21, 2000.[Medline]
  27. Lammer C., Wagerer S., Saffrich R., Mertens D., Ansorge W., Hoffmann I. The cdc25B phosphatase is essential for the G2/M phase transition in human cells. J. Cell Sci., 111: 2445-2453, 1998.[Abstract]
  28. Ambs S., Merriam W. G., Bennett W. P., Felley-Bosco E., Ogunfusika M. O., Oser S. M., Klein S., Shields P. G., Billiar T. R., Harris C. C. Frequent nitric oxide synthase-2 expression in human colon adenomas: implication for tumor angiogenesis and colon cancer progression. Cancer Res., 58: 334-341, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Erard M. S., Belenguer P., Caizergues-Ferrer M., Pantaloni A., Amalric F. A major nucleolar protein, nucleolin, induces chromatin decondensation by binding to histone H1. Eur. J. Biochem., 175: 525-530, 1988.[Medline]
  30. Fernandes-Alnemri T., Armstrong R. C., Krebs J., Srinivasula S. M., Wang L., Bullrich F., Fritz L. C., Trapani J. A., Tomaselli K. J., Litwack G., Alnemri E. S. In vitro activation of CPP32 and Mch3 by Mch4, a novel human apoptotic cysteine protease containing two FADD-like domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 7464-7469, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Eagle L. R., Yin X., Brothman A. R., Williams B. J., Atkin N. B., Prochownik E. V. Mutation of the MXI1 gene in prostate cancer. Nat. Genet., 9: 249-255, 1995.[Medline]
  32. Hu W. H., Johnson H., Shu H. B. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors signal NF-{kappa}B and JNK activation and apoptosis through distinct pathways. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 30603-30610, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GutHome page
C C Thorn, T C Freeman, N Scott, P J Guillou, and D G Jayne
Laser microdissection expression profiling of marginal edges of colorectal tumours reveals evidence of increased lactate metabolism in the aggressive phenotype
Gut, March 1, 2009; 58(3): 404 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Imai, S. Hirata, A. Irie, S. Senju, Y. Ikuta, K. Yokomine, M. Harao, M. Inoue, T. Tsunoda, S. Nakatsuru, et al.
Identification of a Novel Tumor-Associated Antigen, Cadherin 3/P-Cadherin, as a Possible Target for Immunotherapy of Pancreatic, Gastric, and Colorectal Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6487 - 6495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. K. Chan, O. L. Griffith, I. T. Tai, and S. J.M. Jones
Meta-analysis of Colorectal Cancer Gene Expression Profiling Studies Identifies Consistently Reported Candidate Biomarkers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 543 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. Kanehira, T. Katagiri, A. Shimo, R. Takata, T. Shuin, T. Miki, T. Fujioka, and Y. Nakamura
Oncogenic Role of MPHOSPH1, a Cancer-Testis Antigen Specific to Human Bladder Cancer
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3276 - 3285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. Grade, P. Hormann, S. Becker, A. B. Hummon, D. Wangsa, S. Varma, R. Simon, T. Liersch, H. Becker, M. J. Difilippantonio, et al.
Gene Expression Profiling Reveals a Massive, Aneuploidy-Dependent Transcriptional Deregulation and Distinct Differences between Lymph Node-Negative and Lymph Node-Positive Colon Carcinomas
Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J.-H. Park, M.-L. Lin, T. Nishidate, Y. Nakamura, and T. Katagiri
PDZ-Binding Kinase/T-LAK Cell-Originated Protein Kinase, a Putative Cancer/Testis Antigen with an Oncogenic Activity in Breast Cancer.
Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 9186 - 9195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
P. Andreu, S. Colnot, C. Godard, P. Laurent-Puig, D. Lamarque, A. Kahn, C. Perret, and B. Romagnolo
Identification of the IFITM Family as a New Molecular Marker in Human Colorectal Tumors
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 1949 - 1955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
T. Matsunaga and M.-a. Muramatsu
Knowledge-based computational search for genes associated with the metabolic syndrome
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2005; 21(14): 3146 - 3154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Kidd, J. Yu, X. Li, W. D. Shannon, M. A. Watson, and H. L. McLeod
Variance in the Expression of 5-Fluorouracil Pathway Genes in Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2612 - 2619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Takata, T. Katagiri, M. Kanehira, T. Tsunoda, T. Shuin, T. Miki, M. Namiki, K. Kohri, Y. Matsushita, T. Fujioka, et al.
Predicting Response to Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancers through Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiling
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2625 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C.-Y. Hao, D. H. Moore, P. Wong, J. L. Bennington, N. M. Lee, and L.-C. Chen
Alteration of Gene Expression in Macroscopically Normal Colonic Mucosa from Individuals with a Family History of Sporadic Colon Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 11(4): 1400 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Uchida, T. Tsunoda, S. Wada, Y. Furukawa, Y. Nakamura, and H. Tahara
Ring Finger Protein 43 as a New Target for Cancer Immunotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8577 - 8586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Nakatsura, H. Komori, T. Kubo, Y. Yoshitake, S. Senju, T. Katagiri, Y. Furukawa, M. Ogawa, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Nishimura
Mouse Homologue of a Novel Human Oncofetal Antigen, Glypican-3, Evokes T-Cell-Mediated Tumor Rejection without Autoimmune Reactions in Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8630 - 8640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. M. Heidenblut, J. Luttges, M. Buchholz, C. Heinitz, J. Emmersen, K. L. Nielsen, P. Schreiter, M. Souquet, S. Nowacki, U. Herbrand, et al.
aRNA-longSAGE: a new approach to generate SAGE libraries from microdissected cells
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2004; 32(16): e131 - e131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. E. Rogler, T. Tchaikovskaya, R. Norel, A. Massimi, C. Plescia, E. Rubashevsky, P. Siebert, and L. E. Rogler
RNA expression microarrays (REMs), a high-throughput method to measure differences in gene expression in diverse biological samples
Nucleic Acids Res., August 25, 2004; 32(15): e120 - e120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L.-C. Chen, C.-Y. Hao, Y. S. Y. Chiu, P. Wong, J. S. Melnick, M. Brotman, J. Moretto, F. Mendes, A. P. Smith, J. L. Bennington, et al.
Alteration of Gene Expression in Normal-Appearing Colon Mucosa of APCmin Mice and Human Cancer Patients
Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 64(10): 3694 - 3700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Sanchez-Carbayo, F. Saint, J. J. Lozano, A. Viale, and C. Cordon-Cardo
Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles in Laser-Microdissected, Nonembedded, and OCT-Embedded Tumor Samples by Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2003; 49(12): 2096 - 2100.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Clarke, M. L. George, S. Easdale, D. Cunningham, R. I. Swift, M. E. Hill, D. M. Tait, and P. Workman
Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer Therapy in Human Colorectal Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling
Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6855 - 6863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. P. Diggle, S. Cruickshank, J. D. Olsburgh, S. Pellegrin, B. Smith, R. E. Banks, P. J. Selby, M. A. Knowles, J. Southgate, and P. Harnden
Identification of Genes Up-Regulated in Urothelial Tumors: The 67-kd Laminin Receptor and Tumor-Associated Trypsin Inhibitor
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2003; 163(2): 493 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
S. Kakiuchi, Y. Daigo, T. Tsunoda, S. Yano, S. Sone, and Y. Nakamura
Genome-Wide Analysis of Organ-Preferential Metastasis of Human Small Cell Lung Cancer in Mice
Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 1(7): 485 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. H. Montrose
The Future of GI and Liver Research: Editorial Perspectives: I. Visions of epithelial research
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): G547 - G550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
D. F. Jelinek, R. C. Tschumper, G. A. Stolovitzky, S. J. Iturria, Y. Tu, J. Lepre, N. Shah, and N. E. Kay
Identification of a Global Gene Expression Signature of B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Mol. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 1(5): 346 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. S. Williams, R. B. Gaynor, S. Scoggin, U. Verma, T. Gokaslan, C. Simmang, J. Fleming, D. Tavana, E. Frenkel, and C. Becerra
Identification and Validation of Genes Involved in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer Using cDNA Microarrays and RNA Interference
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 9(3): 931 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. Hasegawa, Y. Furukawa, M. Li, S. Satoh, T. Kato, T. Watanabe, T. Katagiri, T. Tsunoda, Y. Yamaoka, and Y. Nakamura
Genome-Wide Analysis of Gene Expression in Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancers Using a Complementary DNA Microarray Representing 23,040 Genes
Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 62(23): 7012 - 7017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Dennis, J. K. Vass, E. C. Wit, W. N. Keith, and K. A. Oien
Identification from Public Data of Molecular Markers of Adenocarcinoma Characteristic of the Site of Origin
Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 62(21): 5999 - 6005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. Nagayama, T. Katagiri, T. Tsunoda, T. Hosaka, Y. Nakashima, N. Araki, K. Kusuzaki, T. Nakayama, T. Tsuboyama, T. Nakamura, et al.
Genome-wide Analysis of Gene Expression in Synovial Sarcomas Using a cDNA Microarray
Cancer Res., October 15, 2002; 62(20): 5859 - 5866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J.-i. Okutsu, T. Tsunoda, Y. Kaneta, T. Katagiri, O. Kitahara, H. Zembutsu, R. Yanagawa, S. Miyawaki, K. Kuriyama, N. Kubota, et al.
Prediction of Chemosensitivity for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, According to Expression Levels of 28 Genes Selected by Genome-wide Complementary DNA Microarray Analysis,
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2002; 1(12): 1035 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
K. Birkenkamp-Demtroder, L. L. Christensen, S. H. Olesen, C. M. Frederiksen, P. Laiho, L. A. Aaltonen, S. Laurberg, F. B. Sorensen, R. Hagemann, and T. F. Orntoft
Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4352 - 4363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
D. Karan, D. L. Kelly, A. Rizzino, M.-F. Lin, and S. K. Batra
Expression profile of differentially-regulated genes during progression of androgen-independent growth in human prostate cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 967 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
S. Ramaswamy and T. R. Golub
DNA Microarrays in Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1932 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
H. Sasaki, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Nakashima, S. Moriyama, H. Yukiue, M. Kaji, M. Kiriyama, I. Fukai, Y. Yamakawa, and Y. Fujii
{beta}IGH3, a TGF-{beta} Inducible Gene, is Overexpressed in Lung Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2002; 32(3): 85 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. J. Scheidl, S. Nilsson, M. Kalen, M. Hellstrom, M. Takemoto, J. Hakansson, and P. Lindahl
mRNA Expression Profiling of Laser Microbeam Microdissected Cells from Slender Embryonic Structures
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 160(3): 801 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
R. A. Craven, N. Totty, P. Harnden, P. J. Selby, and R. E. Banks
Laser Capture Microdissection and Two-Dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis : Evaluation of Tissue Preparation and Sample Limitations
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 160(3): 815 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. Dan, T. Tsunoda, O. Kitahara, R. Yanagawa, H. Zembutsu, T. Katagiri, K. Yamazaki, Y. Nakamura, and T. Yamori
An Integrated Database of Chemosensitivity to 55 Anticancer Drugs and Gene Expression Profiles of 39 Human Cancer Cell Lines
Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(4): 1139 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
H. C. King and A. A. Sinha
Gene Expression Profile Analysis by DNA Microarrays: Promise and Pitfalls
JAMA, November 14, 2001; 286(18): 2280 - 2288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
G. Subramanian, M. D. Adams, J. C. Venter, and S. Broder
Implications of the Human Genome for Understanding Human Biology and Medicine
JAMA, November 14, 2001; 286(18): 2296 - 2307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C. Kihara, T. Tsunoda, T. Tanaka, H. Yamana, Y. Furukawa, K. Ono, O. Kitahara, H. Zembutsu, R. Yanagawa, K. Hirata, et al.
Prediction of Sensitivity of Esophageal Tumors to Adjuvant Chemotherapy by cDNA Microarray Analysis of Gene-Expression Profiles
Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(17): 6474 - 6479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitahara, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitahara, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, T.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online