Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linja, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Visakorpi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linja, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Visakorpi, T.
[Cancer Research 61, 3550-3555, May 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research

Advances in Brief

Amplification and Overexpression of Androgen Receptor Gene in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer1

Marika J. Linja, Kimmo J. Savinainen, Outi R. Saramäki, Teuvo L. J. Tammela, Robert L. Vessella and Tapio Visakorpi2

Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Medical Technology [M. J. L., K. J. S., O. R. S., T. V.] and Department of Urology [T. L. J. T], University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland, and Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 [R. L. V.].


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The expression level of the androgen receptor (AR) gene in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer was determined by using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay. Eight benign prostate hyperplasias, 33 untreated and 13 hormone-refractory locally recurrent carcinomas, as well as 10 prostate cancer xenografts, were analyzed. All hormone-refractory tumors expressed AR and showed, on average, 6-fold higher expression than androgen-dependent tumors or benign prostate hyperplasias (P < 0.001). Four of 13 (31%) hormone-refractory tumors contained AR gene amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Androgen-independent tumors with gene amplification expressed, on average, a 2-fold higher level of AR than the refractory tumors without the gene amplification. Two xenografts (LuCaP 35 and 69) showed amplification and high-level expression of the AR gene. These xenografts are the first prostate cancer model systems containing the gene amplification. The findings demonstrate that AR is highly expressed in androgen-independent prostate cancer, suggesting that the AR signaling pathway is important in the progression of prostate cancer during endocrine treatment. The two xenografts with the AR gene amplification will enable studies evaluating the functional significance of the amplification and development of new treatment strategies based on high-level expression of AR.


   Introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Prostate carcinoma is the most common male malignancy in many industrialized countries. Despite the widespread use of serum PSA3 measurements to detect cancer in asymptomatic men, approximately 30–40% of patients are diagnosed with extracapsular disease (1) . For such advanced disease, androgen deprivation remains the only effective treatment modality (2) . Almost all prostate carcinomas are originally androgen-dependent (3) . However, during the hormonal therapy, androgen-independent tumor cells eventually emerge, leading to clinical relapse. There are no effective treatments available for such hormone-refractory tumors (2) .

Previously, we and others have reported that approximately one-third of prostate carcinomas recurring during endocrine therapy contain an AR gene amplification (4, 5, 6, 7) . Amplification is not found in any untreated prostate tumors, suggesting that the gene amplification is likely to be involved in the failure of the hormonal treatment.

Gene amplification is believed to lead to overexpression of the target gene of amplification (8) . Thus, it has been suggested that amplification of the AR gene could cause overexpression, allowing the cancer cells to continue androgen-dependent growth even in very low levels of androgens left in serum after castration (4 , 9) . Consistent with this hypothesis, up-regulation of AR levels and its transcriptional activity have been observed in LNCaP cells cultured for about 60 passages in androgen-depleted medium (10) . In addition, a preliminary clinical study showed that patients with AR gene amplification responded better to the so-called MAB, which abolishes the effects of adrenal androgens, than patients without the amplification (11) .

Our preliminary data have, indeed, suggested that the AR amplification leads to overexpression of the gene in hormone-refractory prostate tumors (5) . However, this was found by using poorly quantitative mRNA in situ hybridization technique in a small number of tumors. To study further the role of the AR gene in endocrine-treatment failure in prostate cancers, we have here quantified the expression of AR and PSA genes in 54 prostate tumors and 10 prostate cancer xenografts using a real-time RT-PCR system (Light Cycler). The AR gene copy number was determined by FISH. The association of gene expression with gene copy number and tumor type was analyzed.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor and Xenograft Samples.
Freshly frozen specimens from 8 BPHs, 33 androgen-dependent untreated primary prostate carcinomas (32 prostatectomy specimens and 1 TURP specimen), and 13 locally recurrent hormone refractory prostate carcinomas (TURP specimens) were obtained from the Tampere University Hospital (Tampere, Finland). Of the untreated primary carcinomas, 12 were grade I, 15 were grade II, and 6 were grade III, according to the WHO classification (12) . The Tumor-Node-Metastasis distribution of the cases was pT1, 2; pT2, 15; pT3, 13; pT4, 2; pTX, 1; pN0, 30; pN+, 1; pNX, 2; M0, 32; and M+, 1. The hormone-refractory tumor specimens were obtained from patients experiencing urethral obstruction during the hormonal monotherapy. The endocrine therapy modalities were either orchiectomy (four cases), luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (four cases), estrogen (one case), MAB (three cases), and unknown (one case). The time from the beginning of the therapy to TURP varied from 16 to 60 months. The specimens were histologically examined for the presence of tumor tissue using H&E-stained slides. Only samples containing more than 60% of cancerous or hyperplastic tissue were selected for the analyses. The fraction of carcinomas cells in the androgen-dependent and hormone-refractory tumors was, on average, equal. In addition, freshly frozen samples from 10 prostate cancer xenografts (LuCaP 23.1, 23.8, 23.12, 35, 41, 49, 58, 69, 70, and 73) were analyzed. All xenografts, except LuCaP 49 and LuCaP 58, have been established from hormone-refractory human prostate carcinomas and propagated in intact male mice.

RT-PCR.
One to three 20-µm frozen sections were cut using a cryotome. Total RNAs were isolated from the sections using Qiagen RNeasy MiniKit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA), and used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis with Superscript II reverse transcriptase and oligo d(T)12–18 primer according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). For preparing the standard curve, total RNA from prostate cancer cell line LNCaP (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), cultured under recommended conditions, was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the first strand cDNA synthesis, serial dilutions were made corresponding to about 500, 100, 20, 4, and 0.8 ng of cDNA.

Primers for the AR, PSA, and TBP genes were designed with the assistance of the Primer3 program.4 To avoid amplification of any genomic DNA, the forward and reverse primers for each gene were chosen from different exons. The sizes of PCR products were designed to be under 400 bp to optimize the RT-PCR measurements. Primer and probe sequences for the genes are given in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 The primer and probe sequences used in the real-time RT-PCR

 
The PCR reactions were performed in the LightCycler apparatus (13) using the LC DNA Hybridization Probes Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Thermocycling for each reaction was done in a final volume of 20 µl containing 2 µl of cDNA sample (or standard), 4 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 µM both fluorescein- and LC Red 640-labeled probes (0.4 µM LC Red 640 probe in TBP reactions) as well as 1x ready-to-use reaction mix including Taq DNA polymerase, reaction buffer, and deoxynucleotide triphosphate mix. After 10 s of initial denaturation at 95°C, the cycling conditions of 45 cycles consisted of denaturation at 95°C for 1 s, annealing at 55°C (for AR and PSA) or 58°C (for TBP) for 10 s, and elongation at 72°C for 10 (AR and TBP) or 13 (PSA) s. The LightCycler apparatus measured the fluorescence of each sample in every cycle at the end of the annealing step. After the PCR reaction, the software program plotted logarithmic values of fluorescence against cycle number. After proportional background adjustment, the fit-point method was used to determine the cycle in which the log-linear signal was distinguished from the background, and that cycle number was used as the crossing-point value. The software produced the standard curve by measuring the crossing point of each standard and plotting them against the logarithmic values of concentrations. The concentrations of unknown samples were then calculated by setting their crossing points to the standard curve. The expression level of AR and PSA were normalized by the housekeeping gene TBP. The relative expression was illustrated by dividing the AR and PSA values with the TBP value and multiplying by 100. TBP was chosen as the reference gene, because there are no known retropseudogenes for it, and the expression of TBP is lower than in many commonly used, abundantly expressed reference genes (14) . After the PCR, every sample was also run in 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis to ensure that a right-size product was amplified in the reaction

FISH.
The P1-probe for the AR gene (LCG-P1AR) and a pericentromeric alphoid repeat probe for chromosome X (DXZ1) were labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics) and FITC-dUTP (NEN, Boston, MA), respectively, by nick translation. The dual-color hybridization was done essentially as described previously (4 , 15) . Briefly, 5 µm freshly frozen tissue sections were fixed with a series of 50, 75, and 100% 3:1 methanol-acetic acid (Carnoy’s fixative). Subsequently, the slides were denatured in a 70% formamide-2x SSC solution (pH 7.0) at 70°C for 3 min and dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series. Hybridization was done overnight at 37°C. After stringent washes, the slides were stained with anti-digoxigenin-rhodamine (Roche Diagnostics) and counterstained with an antifade solution (Vectashied; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) containing 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The FISH signals were scored from nonoverlapping epithelial cells using an Olympus BX50 epifluorescence microscope (Tokyo, Japan). The criteria for amplification were according to the published guidelines (4) . Briefly, tumors with tight clusters of signals of AR or >2-fold higher numbers of AR than centromeric signals were considered to contain an amplification.

Statistical Analyses.
The association of the gene copy number and tumor type with the expression level was calculated with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.


   Results
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
AR Gene Amplification.
In FISH analyses, 4 of 13 (31%) hormone refractory prostate cancers showed amplification of the AR gene. As expected, AR gene amplification was not detected in any of the 33 primary tumors or 8 BPHs studied. High-level amplification of the AR gene was found in two xenografts (LuCaP 35 and 69; Fig. 1Citation ). In four other xenografts (LuCaP 23.1, 23.8, 23.12, and 70), two copies of the chromosome X centromere, as well as AR, were found. In the remaining four xenografts, one copy of AR and the centromere was detected.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Dual-color FISH analysis of prostate cancer xenografts LuCaP 35 (A) and LuCaP 69 (B). The clustering of red signals indicates amplification of the AR gene. Both samples show two chromosome X centromeres (green signals). The LuCaP 69 seems to have a higher copy number of AR than LuCaP 35.

 
Expression of AR Gene.
Fig. 2Citation shows a standard curve of the real-time RT-PCR measurement of AR. The dynamic range was wide, from 0.8 to 500 ng of equivalent total cDNA. The linear relationship between the fractional cycle and the fluorescent threshold was strong (r2 = ~1). In addition to TBP, the expression of ß-actin was measured and used alternatively for normalization in most of the samples (data not shown). The results were similar with both control genes. Because of the potential problems with the ß-actin retropseudogenes, TBP was chosen for normalization in the whole material. Fig. 3ACitation illustrates the relative expression of AR in BPH as well as in primary and hormone-refractory prostate cancers. All refractory tumors expressed the AR. The median expression was 6-fold higher in hormone-refractory tumors than in primary tumors or BPHs (P < 0.001). The median value of AR expression in the hormone-refractory tumors with the gene amplification was >2 times higher than in the refractory tumors without the amplification. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.057). The tumor with the highest expression also showed the gene amplification. In the xenografts, there was a clear tendency that the expression of AR increased with the gene copy number (Fig. 4A)Citation . The LuCaP 49 xenograft did not show expression at all. In addition, clearly the highest expression of AR was observed in the xenograft LuCaP 69, which contained the highest level of AR amplification.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Standard curve of the AR expression measurement by real-time RT-PCR. A, serially diluted standard contained approximately 500, 100, 20, 4, and 0.8 ng of total cDNA. Cycle number is blotted against fluorescent signal obtained in every cycle at the end of the annealing step. B, standard curve blotting fractional cycle number at the fluorescent threshold for each amplification curve presented in A.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Relative expression of AR (A) and PSA (B) genes in prostate tumor samples analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. •, tumors containing AR gene amplification; {circ}, tumors without the amplification. Median value of expression is shown by a horizontal line. The expression of AR was higher in hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas than in BPH or in the untreated primary carcinomas (P < 0.001). Expression of PSA was about equal in all tumor types.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Relative expression of AR (A) and PSA (B) genes in prostate cancer xenografts analyzed by real-time RT-PCR The expression of AR increased along with the growing gene-copy number. The highest expression of AR was found in LuCaP 69, which showed the highest copy number of the gene. The expression of PSA was ~10-fold in LUCaP 23.1, 23.8, and 23.12 compared with the other xenografts. LuCaP49, established from small cell carcinoma, did not express either AR or PSA.

 
Expression of PSA.
The expression of PSA was about the same in all tumor types (P = 0.055), as shown in Fig. 3BCitation . Neither was there any statistical significance of association between the expression of PSA and AR copy number in the hormone-refractory tumors. LuCaP 49 did not express PSA at all, whereas LuCaP 23.1, 23.8, and 23.12 expressed about 10 times more PSA than the other xenografts (Fig. 4B)Citation .


   Discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
REFERENCES
 
The emergence of hormone-refractory prostate cancer is a serious clinical problem. Thus, it is not surprising that mechanisms underlying the transition of prostate tumors from the androgen-dependent to the -independent phase have been studied extensively (16) . During recent years, evidence has accumulated suggesting that the AR signaling pathway plays a central role in the progression of prostate cancer during hormonal therapy. Immunohistochemical studies have indicated that AR is expressed in both hormone-naïve and -refractory tumors (17, 18, 19, 20, 21) . However, there has been controversial data on the level of expression in these different forms of carcinoma. Some publications, based on either immunohistochemistry, mRNA in situ hybridization, or RT-PCR, have suggested that the expression of AR is high in hormone-refractory tumors (4 , 5 , 22) . Others have suggested heterogeneous or decreased expression of AR in a subset of the hormone-refractory tumors (17 , 20 , 23) . The main shortcoming of all these studies has been that the methodologies used for the measurement of expression have been semiquantitative at best. Here, our strategy was to use the new real-time RT-PCR approach for measuring AR expression. In real-time PCR, the quantification of the template is based on detection of the cycle in which the reaction enters the exponential phase, instead of on measuring the amount of end product. Thus, none of the reagents are rate-limiting in the reaction at the time of measurement of the fluorescence. Several studies have already shown that the real-time RT-PCR is a highly quantitative and reliable method (14 , 24, 25, 26) .

We showed that locally recurrent, hormone-refractory prostate tumors expressed significantly more AR than BPHs or hormone-naïve prostate carcinomas. In addition, we did not find any hormone-refractory tumor with low-level expression. All of the tumors also produced the AR protein, as detected by immunohistochemistry (data not shown). The results are somewhat in disagreement with recent data suggesting that a fraction (10–15%) of hormone-refractory metastatic lesions express only low levels of AR because of hypermethylation of the promoter CpG island (23) . The discrepancy could well be attributable to the fact that only locally recurrent tumors, rather than metastases, were analyzed here, or that the number of tumors analyzed was just too low to detect such a small subgroup.

Four of 13 (31%) hormone-refractory tumors contained AR gene amplification, the frequency of the amplification being in accordance with previously published data (4, 5, 6, 7) . The expression of AR seemed to be higher in the tumors with the amplification than in those without the amplification, but the difference was not statistically significant. The tumor clearly showing the highest expression of AR also contained the gene amplification. Still, the amplification explained only a part of the high expression level in the androgen-independent tumors. It seems that other mechanisms than amplification, leading to overexpression of the AR, must also be involved. Altogether, the high level expression of AR in the hormone-refractory tumors underlies the importance of the AR signaling pathway in endocrine therapy failure.

To analyze the functionality of the AR signaling pathway in the hormone-refractory tumors, we measured the expression of PSA, which is androgen-regulated (27) . PSA was clearly expressed in the hormone-refractory tumors, suggesting that AR is functional. The level of mRNA expression was about the same in BPH and hormone-naïve and -refractory tumors. It has earlier been shown that PSA protein expression is actually higher in BPH than in primary tumors (28) . There was no association between AR amplification and PSA expression possible because of the complex regulation of PSA expression. It has actually been suggested that there are also other signaling pathways than AR that regulate the expression of PSA (29) .

One of the most critical problems in studying the progression of prostate cancer has been the lack of good model systems. Of the five commercially available cell lines (PC-3, DU145, LNCaP, MDA-Pca2a, and NIH-H660), only two express AR (LNCaP and MDA-Pca2b). Both of them contain AR mutations (30 , 31) . In addition, there has been no cell line or xenograft that demonstrates AR gene amplification. Therefore, we screened 10 recently established prostate cancer xenografts derived from eight patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Two of the xenografts contained the amplification. As far as we know, these are the first prostate cancer model systems that were found to have amplification of the AR gene. We have shown previously that the amplified AR gene in hormone refractory tumors is usually of the wild type (5 , 32) . The fact that neither one of the xenografts contains mutations in the AR gene5 further strengthens their utility for studying the functional consequences of the gene amplification. We analyzed also the expression of AR in the xenografts. All but LuCaP 49 expressed AR. LuCaP 49 represents a rare form of prostate tumors, i.e., small cell carcinomas, and these are known not to express AR (33) . Interestingly, it seemed that one additional copy of AR was able to increase the expression of the gene, suggesting that even a small increase in gene dosage could have biological significance. We have shown earlier that ~20% of locally recurrent prostate carcinomas contain two copies of AR (5) , which thus may have biological significance. The exact copy number of AR in the cases of amplification (LuCaP 35 and LuCaP 69) could not be evaluated because of the clustering of the signals in the FISH analyses. However, based on the sizes of the clusters, it was evident that LuCaP 69 contained a higher copy number of AR. It also expressed the gene more than the others. All xenografts, except LuCaP 49, expressed AR protein product as detected by immunohistochemistry (data not shown). However, because of the nonquantitative nature of AR immunohistochemistry, only RT-PCR data were used for the comparison of expression levels.

In most of the xenografts, the level of expression of PSA was about the same. LuCaP 49 did not express the gene as was expected from the fact that it is a small cell carcinoma. LuCaP 23.1, LuCaP 23.8, and LuCaP 23.12 expressed more PSA than the others. These three xenografts, derived from a single parental xenograft LuCaP 23, are known to express high levels of PSA (34) . The growth of these xenografts in mice is also very androgen-dependent. Although eight of the xenografts were derived from tumors that were androgen-independent in the patient, they grow as androgen-dependent or -responsive tumors in mice. Castration of the mice decreases the expression of PSA and the volume of the tumors, especially in LuCaP 35 and derivatives of LuCaP 23, but also in LuCaP 23- and 41-bearing mice. In addition, LuCaP 58 and 73 show slower growth in castrated than in intact male mice. LuCaP 23.1, 23.8, 23.12, and 35 eventually become androgen-independent when propagated in castrated mice for longer period of time. The growth of LuCaP 49 is fast and truly androgen-independent in intact mice (34) .6

Mechanisms other than gene amplification that are related to AR and have been suggested to be important in the emergence of androgen-independent prostate cancer, include mutations in the AR and alterations in the coregulators of the AR as well as ligand independence or alternative activation of AR (30 , 31 , 35, 36, 37, 38, 39) . Although, in general, AR mutations seem to be quite rare in hormone-refractory tumors, about 25% of tumors treated with antiandrogens (flutamide) do show specific mutations (35) . Thus, it seems that the treatment selects for the mutations, which alter the transactivational properties of the AR protein. Such mutated forms of AR can be activated by other hormones or antiandrogens (22 , 30 , 35) . In addition, it has been suggested that other signaling pathways, especially HER-2/neu, could activate AR in the presence of low levels of androgens (36 , 38) . In vitro data has also suggested that AR coregulators may alter the transactivational properties of AR (39 , 40) . However, practically nothing is known about the expression of these coregulators in prostate cancer in vivo.

In conclusion, our finding of high-level expression of AR in hormone-refractory tumors support the notion that the AR signaling pathway is important in the emergence of androgen-independent prostate cancer. One key mechanism for the overexpression seems to be gene amplification. As AR has emerged to be a key player in the progression of prostate cancer, the critical issue is whether it could be targeted by novel therapies. Evidently, castration is not enough. Although it seems that MAB is somewhat more beneficial for patients with the amplification than without, neither is it efficient enough (11) . New treatment modalities, based on the high expression of AR in the cancer cells, have been suggested (41 , 42) . The development of such therapies will be boosted by our finding of two model systems containing the gene amplification.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Mariitta Vakkuri, Heli Lehtonen, and Maarit Ohranen for technical assistance.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Cancer Society of Finland, the Reino Lahtikari Foundation, the Finnish Cancer Institute, the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and CaP CURE. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Medical Technology, FIN-33014, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Phone: 358-3-215-7725; Fax: 358-3-215-8597; E-mail: tapio.visakorpi{at}uta.fi Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; AR, androgen receptor; MAB, maximal androgen blockade; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; BPH, benign prostate hyperplasia; TBP, TATA-box binding protein; TURP, transurethral resection, RT-PCR; reverse transcription-PCR. Back

4 Internet address: http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3.www.cgi. Back

5 Unpublished data. Back

6 Unpublished data Back

Received 12/21/00. Accepted 3/13/01.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Humphrey P., Keetch D., Smith D., Shepherd D., Catalona W. Prospective characterization of pathological features of prostatic carcinomas detected via serum prostate specific antigen based screening. J. Urol., 155: 816-820, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Gittes R. F. Carcinoma of the prostate. N. Engl. J. Med., 324: 236-245, 1991.[Medline]
  3. Palmberg C., Koivisto P., Visakorpi T., Tammela T. PSA is an independent prognostic marker in hormonally treated prostate cancer. Eur. Urol., 36: 191-196, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Visakorpi T., Hyytinen E., Koivisto P., Tanner M., Keinänen R., Palmberg C., Palotie A., Tammela T., Isola J., Kallioniemi O. P. In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer. Nat. Genet., 9: 401-406, 1995.[Medline]
  5. Koivisto P., Kononen J., Palmberg C., Tammela T., Hyytinen E., Isola J., Trapman J., Cleutjens K., Noordzij A., Visakorpi T., Kallioniemi O. P. Androgen receptor gene amplification: a possible molecular mechanism for androgen deprivation therapy failure in prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 57: 314-319, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bubendorf L., Kononen J., Koivisto P., Schrami P., Moch H., Gasser T., Willi N., Mihatsch M., Sauter G., Kallioniemi O. P. Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughput fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res., 59: 803-806, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Miyoshi Y, Uemura H., Fujinami K., Mikata K., Harada M., Kitamura H., Koizumi Y., Kubota Y. Fluorescence in situ hybridization evaluation of c-myc and androgen receptor gene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in prostate cancer in Japanese men. Prostate, 43: 225-232, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Alitalo K., Schwab M. Oncogene amplification in tumor cells. Adv. Cancer Res., 47: 235-281, 1986.[Medline]
  9. Kallioniemi O. P., Visakorpi T. Genetic basis and clonal evolution of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 68: 225-255, 1996.
  10. Kokontis J., Takakura K., Hay N., Liao S. Increased androgen receptor activity and altered c-myc expression in prostate cancer cells after long-term androgen deprivation. Cancer Res., 54: 1566-1573, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Palmberg C., Koivisto P., Kakkola L., Tammela T. L. J., Kallioniemi O. P., Visakorpi T. Androgen receptor gene amplification at the time of primary progression predicts response to combined androgen blockade as a second-line therapy in advanced prostate cancer. J. Urol., 164: 1992-1995, 2000.[Medline]
  12. Mostofi F. K. Histological Typing of Prostate Tumors World Health Organization Geneva 1980.
  13. Wittwer C. T., Ririe K. M., Andrew R. V., David D. A., Gundry R. A., Balis U. J. The LightCycler: a microvolume multisample fluorimeter with rapid temperature control. Biotechniques, 22: 176-181, 1997.[Medline]
  14. Bieche I., Laurendeau I., Tozlu S., Olivi M., Vidaud D., Lidereau R., Vidaud M. Quantitation of MYC gene expression in sporadic breast tumors with a real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay. Cancer Res., 59: 2759-2765, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hyytinen E., Visakorpi T., Kallioniemi A., Kallioniemi O. P., Isola J. Improved technique for analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry, 16: 93-99, 1994.[Medline]
  16. Visakorpi T. New pieces to the prostate cancer puzzle. Nat. Med., 5: 264-265, 1999.[Medline]
  17. Ruizeveld de Winter J. A., Janssen P. J., Sleddens H. M., Verleun-Mooijman M. C., Trapman J., Brinkmann A. O., Santerse A. B., Schroder F. H., van der Kwast T. H. Androgen receptor status in localized and locally progressive hormone refractory human prostate cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 144: 735-746, 1994.[Abstract]
  18. Sadi M. V., Walsh P. C., Barrack E. R. Immunohistochemical study of androgen receptors in metastatic prostate cancer. Comparison of receptor content and response to hormonal therapy. Cancer (Phila.), 67: 3057-3064, 1991.[Medline]
  19. Tilley W. D., Lim-Tio S. S., Horsfall D. J., Aspinall J. O., Marshall V. R., Skinner J. M. Detection of discrete androgen receptor epitopes in prostate cancer by immunostaining: measurement by color video image analysis. Cancer Res., 54: 4096-4102, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hobisch A., Culig Z., Radmayr C., Bartsch G., Klocker H., Hittmair A. Distant metastases from prostatic carcinoma express androgen receptor protein. Cancer Res., 55: 3068-3072, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Prins G. S., Sklarew R. J., Pertschuk L. P. Image analysis of androgen receptor immunostaining in prostate cancer accurately predicts response to hormonal therapy. J. Urol., 159: 641-649, 1998.[Medline]
  22. Taplin M. E., Bubley G. J., Shuster T. D., Frantz M. E., Spooner A. E., Ogata G. K., Keer H. N., Balk S. P. Mutation of the androgen-receptor gene in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 332: 1393-1398, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kinoshita H., Shi Y., Sandefur C., Meisner L. F., Chang C., Choon A., Reznikoff C. R., Bova G. S., Friedl A., Jarrard D. F. Methylation of the androgen receptor minimal promoter silences transcription in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 60: 3623-3630, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Morrison T. B., Weis J. J., Wittwer C. T. Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. Biotechniques, 24: 954-958, 960, 962, 1998.[Medline]
  25. Gibson U. E., Heid C. A., Williams P. M. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res., 6: 995-1001, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Heid C. A., Stevens J., Livak K. J., Williams P. M. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res., 6: 986-994, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Young C. Y., Montgomery B. T., Andrews P. E., Qui S., D., Bilhartz D, L., Tindall D. J. Hormonal regulation of prostate-specific antigen messenger RNA in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line LNCaP. Cancer Res., 51: 3748-3752, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Magklara A., Scorilas A., Stephan C., Kristiansen G. O., Hauptmann S., Jung K., Diamandis E. P. Decreased concentrations of prostate-specific antigen and human glandular kallikrein 2 in malignant versus nonmalignant prostatic tissue. Urology, 56: 527-532, 2000.[Medline]
  29. Oettgen P., Finger E., Sun Z., Akbarali Y., Thamrongsak U., Boltax J., Grall F., Dube A., Weiss A., Brown L., Quinn G., Kas K., Endress G., Kunsch C., Libermann T. A. PDEF, a novel prostate epithelium-specific ets transcription factor, interacts with the androgen receptor and activates prostate-specific antigen gene expression. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 1216-1225, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Veldscholte J., Ris-Stalpers C., Kuiper G. G. J. M., Jenster G., Berrevoets C., Claassen E., van Rooij H. C. J., Trapman J., Brinkmann A. O. A mutation in the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor of human LNCaP cells affects steroid binding characteristics and response to anti-androgens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 17: 534-540, 1990.
  31. Zhao X. Y., Malloy P. J., Krishnan A. V., Srilatha S., Navone N. M., Peehl D. M., Feldman D. Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor. Nat. Med., 6: 703-706, 2000.[Medline]
  32. Wallen M. J., Linja M., Kaartinen K., Schleutker J., Visakorpi T. Androgen receptor gene mutations in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J. Pathol., 189: 559-563, 1999.[Medline]
  33. Helpap P., Kollermann J. Undifferentiated carcinoma of the prostate with small cell features: immunohistochemical subtyping and reflections on histogenesis. Virchows Arch., 5: 385-391, 1999.
  34. Ellis W. J., Vessella R. L., Buhler K. R., Bladou F., True L., D., Bigler S, A., Curtis D., Lang P. H. Characterization of a novel androgen sensitive, prostate specific antigen-producing prostatic carcinoma xenograft: LuCaP 23. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 1039-1048, 1996.[Abstract]
  35. Taplin M. E., Bubley G. J., Ko Y. J., Small E. J., Upton M., Rajeshkumar B., Balk S. P. Selection for androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancers treated with androgen antagonist. Cancer Res., 59: 2511-2515, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Craft N., Shostak Y., Carey M., Sawyers C. L. A mechanism for hormone-independent prostate cancer through modulation of androgen receptor signaling by the HER-2/neu tyrosine kinase. Nat. Med., 5: 280-285, 1999.[Medline]
  37. Culig Z., Hobisch A., Cronauer M. V., Radmayr C., Trapman J., Hittmair A., Bartsch G., Klocker H. Androgen receptor activation in prostatic tumor cell lines by insulin-like growth factor-I, keratinocyte growth factor, and epidermal growth factor. Cancer Res., 54: 5474-5478, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Yeh S., Lin H. K., Kang H. Y., Thin T. H., Lin M. F., Chang C. From HER2/Neu signal cascade to androgen receptor and its coactivators: a novel pathway by induction of androgen target genes through MAP kinase in prostate cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 5458-5463, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Yeh S., Chang C. Cloning and characterization of a specific coactivator, ARA70, for the androgen receptor in human prostate cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 5517-5521, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Miyamoto H., Yeh S., Wilding G., Chang C. Promotion of agonist activity of antiandrogens by the androgen receptor coactivator, ARA70, in human prostate cancer DU145 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 7379-7384, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kuduk S. D., Harris T. C., Zheng F. F., Sepp-Lorenzino L., Ouerfelli Q., Rosen N., Danishefsky S. J. Synthesis and evaluation of geldanamycin-testosterone hybrids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 10: 1303-1306, 2000.[Medline]
  42. Eder I. E., Culig Z., Ramoner R., Thurnher M., Putz T., Nessler-Menardi C., Tiefenthaler M., Bartsch G., Klocker H. Inhibition of LncaP prostate cancer cells by means of androgen receptor antisense oligonucleotides. Cancer Gene Ther., 7: 997-1007, 2000.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
R. J. Jin, Y. Lho, L. Connelly, Y. Wang, X. Yu, L. Saint Jean, T. C. Case, K. Ellwood-Yen, C. L. Sawyers, N. A. Bhowmick, et al.
The Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway Controls the Progression of Prostate Cancer to Androgen-Independent Growth
Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6762 - 6769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Vasaitis, A. Belosay, A. Schayowitz, A. Khandelwal, P. Chopra, L. K. Gediya, Z. Guo, H.-B. Fang, V. C.O. Njar, and A. M.H. Brodie
Androgen receptor inactivation contributes to antitumor efficacy of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase inhibitor 3{beta}-hydroxy-17-(1H-benzimidazole-1-yl)androsta-5,16-diene in prostate cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2008; 7(8): 2348 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Ponguta, C. W. Gregory, F. S. French, and E. M. Wilson
Site-specific Androgen Receptor Serine Phosphorylation Linked to Epidermal Growth Factor-dependent Growth of Castration-recurrent Prostate Cancer
J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 20989 - 21001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Montgomery, E. A. Mostaghel, R. Vessella, D. L. Hess, T. F. Kalhorn, C. S. Higano, L. D. True, and P. S. Nelson
Maintenance of Intratumoral Androgens in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Mechanism for Castration-Resistant Tumor Growth
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4447 - 4454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
O. R. Saramaki, A. E. Harjula, P. M. Martikainen, R. L. Vessella, T. L.J. Tammela, and T. Visakorpi
TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion Identifies a Subgroup of Prostate Cancers with a Favorable Prognosis
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3395 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L. G. Wang, E. M. Johnson, Y. Kinoshita, J. S. Babb, M. T. Buckley, L. F. Liebes, J. Melamed, X.-M. Liu, R. Kurek, L. Ossowski, et al.
Androgen Receptor Overexpression in Prostate Cancer Linked to Pur{alpha} Loss from a Novel Repressor Complex
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2678 - 2688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Ko, L. Shi, S. Kim, C. S. Song, and B. Chatterjee
Interplay of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and B-myb in the Negative Regulation of Androgen Receptor Expression by Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 273 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Sterbis, C. Gao, B. Furusato, Y. Chen, S. Shaheduzzaman, L. Ravindranath, D. J. Osborn, I. L. Rosner, A. Dobi, D. G. McLeod, et al.
Higher Expression of the Androgen-Regulated Gene PSA/HK3 mRNA in Prostate Cancer Tissues Predicts Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 758 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Schayowitz, G. Sabnis, V. C.O. Njar, and A. M.H. Brodie
Synergistic effect of a novel antiandrogen, VN/124-1, and signal transduction inhibitors in prostate cancer progression to hormone independence in vitro
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2008; 7(1): 121 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr Relat CancerHome page
H. Neuwirt, M. Puhr, I. T Cavarretta, M. Mitterberger, A. Hobisch, and Z. Culig
Suppressor of cytokine signalling-3 is up-regulated by androgen in prostate cancer cell lines and inhibits androgen-mediated proliferation and secretion
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 1007 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Doghman, T. Karpova, G. A. Rodrigues, M. Arhatte, J. De Moura, L. R. Cavalli, V. Virolle, P. Barbry, G. P. Zambetti, B. C. Figueiredo, et al.
Increased Steroidogenic Factor-1 Dosage Triggers Adrenocortical Cell Proliferation and Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2968 - 2987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
K. P. Porkka, M. J. Pfeiffer, K. K. Waltering, R. L. Vessella, T. L.J. Tammela, and T. Visakorpi
MicroRNA Expression Profiling in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6130 - 6135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr Cancer TherHome page
G. Deep and R. Agarwal
Chemopreventive Efficacy of Silymarin in Skin and Prostate Cancer
Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2007; 6(2): 130 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
K. Tamura, M. Furihata, T. Tsunoda, S. Ashida, R. Takata, W. Obara, H. Yoshioka, Y. Daigo, Y. Nasu, H. Kumon, et al.
Molecular Features of Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Cells by Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiles
Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5117 - 5125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
H. Lilja, A. Vickers, and P. Scardino
Measurements of Proteases or Protease System Components in Blood to Enhance Prediction of Disease Risk or Outcome in Possible Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 25(4): 347 - 348.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Z. Dong, Y. Liu, S. Lu, A. Wang, K. Lee, L.-H. Wang, M. Revelo, and S. Lu
Vav3 Oncogene Is Overexpressed and Regulates Cell Growth and Androgen Receptor Activity in Human Prostate Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 20(10): 2315 - 2325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. R. Logan, L. Gaughan, S. R. C. McCracken, V. Sapountzi, H. Y. Leung, and C. N. Robson
Human PIRH2 Enhances Androgen Receptor Signaling through Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 1 and Is Overexpressed in Prostate Cancer.
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6502 - 6510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C.-p. Chuu, R. A. Hiipakka, J. M. Kokontis, J. Fukuchi, R.-Y. Chen, and S. Liao
Inhibition of Tumor Growth and Progression of LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells in Athymic Mice by Androgen and Liver X Receptor Agonist.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6482 - 6486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. Seethammagari, X. Xie, N. M. Greenberg, and D. M. Spencer
EZC-Prostate Models Offer High Sensitivity and Specificity for Noninvasive Imaging of Prostate Cancer Progression and Androgen Receptor Action.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6199 - 6209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L. Wallner, J. Dai, J. Escara-Wilke, J. Zhang, Z. Yao, Y. Lu, M. Trikha, J. A. Nemeth, M. H. Zaki, and E. T. Keller
Inhibition of Interleukin-6 with CNTO328, an Anti-Interleukin-6 Monoclonal Antibody, Inhibits Conversion of Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer to an Androgen-Independent Phenotype in Orchiectomized Mice.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3087 - 3095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. J. Pienta and D. Bradley
Mechanisms underlying the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1665 - 1671.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Lin, J. Kokontis, F. Tang, B. Godfrey, S. Liao, A. Lin, Y. Chen, and J. Xiang
Androgen and its receptor promote bax-mediated apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(5): 1908 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
O. W. Rokhlin, R. B. Glover, N. V. Guseva, A. F. Taghiyev, K. G. Kohlgraf, and M. B. Cohen
Mechanisms of Cell Death Induced by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Androgen Receptor-Positive Prostate Cancer Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 4(2): 113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Duff and I. J. McEwan
Mutation of Histidine 874 in the Androgen Receptor Ligand-Binding Domain Leads to Promiscuous Ligand Activation and Altered p160 Coactivator Interactions
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 2943 - 2954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
H. I. Scher and C. L. Sawyers
Biology of Progressive, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Directed Therapies Targeting the Androgen-Receptor Signaling Axis
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8253 - 8261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]