| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Virology |
Department of Pathology [G. S. A., W. H. T., K. L. B., E. M., T. S. W. E., K. E. C., L. P.] and Childrens Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics [L. L. Z., K. E. C.], University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics [A. B., A. L. C.], University of South Carolina School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina 29208
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previously we have shown that individual, independently derived HKc/HPV16 lines consistently exhibit higher EGF uptake and EGFR levels than normal HKc when cultured either in the presence or in the absence of exogenous EGF (8) . The acquisition of the HKc/GFI phenotype is accompanied by an additional increase in EGFR protein levels. EGFR in HKc/GFI, but not HKc/HPV16 or normal HKc, are activated in the absence of EGF, and signaling through the EGFR is essential to maintain autonomous growth of HKc/GFI in the absence of EGF and BPE (8) . The studies by Zyzak et al. (8) were conducted using well-established, immortal HKc/HPV16 lines in long-term culture and their respective HKc/GFI and HKc/DR derivatives. In the present study, we asked whether increases in EGFR can be detected early after the transfection of normal HKc with HPV16 DNA (which would exclude that long-term culturing is responsible for EGFR increases) and whether immortalization is necessary for this effect. In addition, we explore the possibility that acute expression of single HPV16 oncoproteins may produce an increase in EGFR in normal HKc. We show here that a robust increase in EGFR mRNA levels can be detected early after transfection of normal HKc with full-length HPV16 DNA, before the cells are immortalized. In addition, acute expression of HPV16 E6 alone results in an increase in EGFR mRNA levels in normal HKc, whereas acute expression of HPV16 E7 alone or HPV16 E5 alone did not produce this effect. However, about one-half of the normal HKc strains we examined proved unresponsive to E6 induction of EGFR mRNA levels, despite the fact that E6 was expressed and functional in these cells. We determined that basal EGFR mRNA and protein levels vary greatly among individual HKc strains as well as among individual skin specimens. We observed that HKc strains that proved unresponsive to E6 exhibited high basal levels of EGFR, whereas the strains that did respond to E6 had relatively low basal EGFR expression. Therefore, we investigated the effects of overexpression of the EGFR in normal HKc and found that acute EGFR expression from an LXSN retrovirus leads to dramatically reduced growth rates and shortened life span in culture. Intriguingly, two HKc strains that did not respond to E6 alone exhibited higher EGFR mRNA levels when infected with E6 and E7 retroviruses together. In addition, despite the fact that acute expression of E7 alone does not induce the EGFR, cells infected with E7 alone exhibited increased EGFR mRNA levels at passage 9 after G418 selection, and HKc immortalized with E7 alone expressed levels of EGFR mRNA comparable with those of cells immortalized with E6 and E7 together. Our results suggest that increased EGFR expression plays an important role in the HPV16-mediated transformation of human epithelial cells. These observations also indicate that overexpression of the EGFR is not tolerated by normal HKc. Thus, to immortalize HKc, the HPV16 oncoproteins must not only increase EGFR levels, but also overcome the mechanisms that inhibit such increases in normal human epithelial cells. These two functions are carried out by E6 and E7, respectively.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Northern Blot Analysis.
Normal HKc and HKc/HPV16 were plated in complete MCDB153-LB medium, and HKc/GFI were plated in MCDB153-LB devoid of EGF and BPE (GFDM). Cells were allowed to grow to about 75% confluence, then washed with PBS and incubated in GFDM for at least 48 h. Total RNA was isolated by the guanidinium thiocyanate/cesium trifluoroacetate gradient centrifugation method (5)
and subjected to Northern blot analysis with an EGFR cDNA probe (gift of Dr. Ira Pastan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA). RNA loading was determined by hybridizing the blots with a ß2-microglobulin cDNA probe (courtesy of Dr. Pedro Lazo, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain). Probes were labeled by random priming, using a commercial kit (Promega) and [32P]dCTP (Amersham Life Science Products). Northern blot analysis was conducted according to standard protocols, as described previously (5)
.
RNase Protection Analysis.
Riboprobes synthesized using a commercial kit (Promega) from cloned templates corresponding to various regions (see below) of the EGFR cDNA were used to compare EGFR levels by RPA (Hybspeed RPA; Ambion). Ten µg of total RNA were hybridized with antisense probes (150,000 cpm) for EGFR and an internal standard (cyclophilin, ß-actin or 28 s rRNA; Ambion) as a loading control. The RNase-digested products were resolved on a 5% polyacrylamide denaturing gel containing 8 M urea at 225 V for 3 h and exposed to X-ray film (Kodak) for 13 days. Two EGFR riboprobes were constructed on the template of the following regions of the human EGFR cDNA: probe V, nt 13211663, protected fragment size 343 bp; and probe IX, nt 27703205 protected fragment size 436 bp. All fragments were produced by PCR, cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), and sequenced.
Southern Blot Analysis.
Genomic DNA (10 µg) from normal HKc, HKc/HPV16 and HKc/GFI was digested with HindIII (10 units/µg in a final volume of 200 µl) at 37°C for 12 h. The digests were separated on a 0.8% agarose gel and transferred to Gene Screen membrane (DuPont) according to the manufacturers instructions. Southern blot analysis was conducted according to standard procedures (3
, 5)
with a human EGFR cDNA probe labeled with 32P by random priming (Promega).
Assay for EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Activity.
Normal HKc, HKc/HPV16d-4 and HKc/GFId-4 were cultured in 150-mm tissue culture dishes (20 each) in their respective media. At 75% confluence, cells were washed with PBS and media replaced with GFDM. Cells were refed with GFDM 24 h later for a total of 48 h in EGF-free medium. Cells were then washed in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, scraped into the same buffer, and collected by centrifugation. Cell pellets were washed once in ice-cold PBS and lysed in 10 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1% aprotinin, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM sodium fluoride]. The cell lysates were incubated with rocking at 4°C for 20 min, their pH was adjusted to 8.5 with 1 N NaOH, and the lysates were then clarified by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min, and then at 10,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The clarified cell lysates were then applied to an affinity column (Amino-Link; Pierce) containing an immobilized anti-EGFR antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the EGFR (Upstate Biotechnologies, Inc.). After washing with lysis buffer, EGFR was eluted from the column with 0.1 M glycine pH 2.8. Fractions (8, of 0.9 ml each) were collected into Eppendorf tubes containing 100 µl of 0.5 M HEPES (pH 7.9), pooled, concentrated 16- to 20-fold using a Centricon 10 (Amicon), and EGFR content and purity were assessed by SDS-PAGE. The relative concentration of EGFR in the samples was estimated by Western blot analysis of various dilutions of each partially purified EGFR preparation with anti-EGFR antibodies. Tyrosine kinase activity in aliquots of partially purified EGFR containing approximately equal amounts of EGFR was measured by determining the transfer of 32P from [
-32P]-ATP to angiotensin II, as described by Bertics and Gill (11)
.
Retroviral Vectors and Retroviral Infection Protocols.
LXSN-based amphotropic retroviral vectors, kindly provided by Denise Galloway, were used to infect primary neonatal foreskin HKc as described previously (12)
. In addition, we subcloned into the pLXSN vector the entire coding sequence for the human EGFR from the plasmid pCO12 (kindly provided by Dr. John Schiller, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). The insert region in the resulting construct was sequenced, and the plasmid was transfected into PA317 cells by the calcium-phosphate precipitation method. After G418 selection and cloning, culture supernatants from individual PA317 clones were used to infect NIH 3T3 and CHO cells, which were then G418-selected and subjected to immunofluorescent staining for the human EGFR to ensure that the retrovirus elicited the expression of human EGFR. Virus stocks were then used to infect normal HKc.
Retroviral infection was performed according to published procedures (12) , which were modified as follows. Primary HKc were infected with filtered (0.22-µm pore size) supernatant from an overnight culture of PA317 cells, producing the control LXSN virus or LSXN retroviruses encoding 6E6, 16E5, 16E6, 16E7, or 16E6/E7 ORFs of HPV or the LXSN-hEGFR virus. Virus stocks were diluted 1:4 in calcium-free complete MCDB153-LB medium before infection to reduce as much as possible their calcium and serum contents. Cells were passaged 24 h after infection and either selected in 50 µg/ml G418 for 4 days or harvested without G418 selection. In that case, parallel dishes were G418-selected to monitor infection efficiencies. RNA (Tri Reagent; Molecular Research Center) and protein extracts were collected at various times (110 days) after infection.
EGFR Immunostaining.
Foreskin tissue was fixed in buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded according to standard procedures. Sections were deparaffinized in several changes of xylene, rehydrated in decreasing concentrations of ethanol in water, and washed in PBS containing blocking calf serum (1.5%). Sections were then treated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide to quench endogenous peroxidases and incubated with a 1:100 dilution of a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody (GRO1; Oncogene Research Products) using the Vectastain Elite kit with the Vector VIP Substrate (Vector Laboratories) according to the manufacturers instructions. Counterstaining of nuclei was performed with methyl green for 10 min at 60°C.
Western Blot Analysis.
Total cell lysates (40 µg protein/sample) were resolved on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad) membranes. The blots were incubated in blocking solution (2% nonfat dry milk) overnight at 4°C. Blots were then probed with an antihuman p53 monoclonal antibody (DO-1; Oncogene Research Products) at a concentration of 0.1 µg/ml. Blots were then probed with a 1:10,000 dilution of biotin-labeled goat antimouse secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.). The membranes were then incubated in a 1:1,000 dilution of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Amersham Life Science), and bands were visualized using the Supersignal chemiluminescence system (Pierce).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-32P]ATP to angiotensin II (11)
. As shown in Fig. 1C
To confirm that the increase in EGFR mRNA expression in HKc/HPV16 lines, compared with normal HKc, was directly associated with HPV16 gene expression and not just a consequence of long-term culturing, we established several new HKc/HPV16 lines from individual normal HKc strains. We transfected each normal HKc strain with BamHI-linearized, gel-purified, full-length HPV16 DNA free of vector sequences. RNA was extracted from each newly derived HKc/HPV16 line as soon as the line was established, but before any appearance of crisis, between 5 and 10 passages after transfection. RNA was also extracted from each individual normal HKc strain of origin at the second passage, when cells were still actively proliferating at a growth rate comparable with that of the established HKc/HPV16 lines. Each HKc/HPV16 line was then compared with its normal HKc strain of origin for EGFR expression by Northern blot analysis, because we intended to determine the size and distribution of the EGFR messages produced as well as their levels. Specific EGFR messages of 10.2 and 5.6 kb could be detected in both normal HKc and HKc/HPV16 (Fig. 2)
; however, EGFR mRNA levels varied considerably among normal HKc strains and were markedly increased in all HKc/HPV16 lines, each compared with its individual normal HKc strain (Fig. 2)
. The same messages were detected in two HKc lines immortalized by infection with retroviral vectors expressing either E6 and E7, or E7 alone. EGFR mRNA levels were similar in the two lines and approached those of a line containing full-length HPV16 DNA (Fig. 2)
. Southern blot analysis of DNA isolated from the HKc/HPV16 lines and their normal HKc strains of origin once again showed no evidence of amplification of the EGFR gene (data not shown).
|
|
|
3.5 PD, LXSN-EGFR-infected cells doubled <1.5 times. This experiment was performed using normal HKc derived from two different individuals with nearly identical results. When controls were nearly confluent, cells were trypsinized and replated, again in equal numbers. The morphology of the cultures at different passages after G418 selection is shown in Fig. 6
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data presented in this paper expand upon our initial observations, to demonstrate that acute expression of HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins in normal HKc is accompanied by an increase in EGFR mRNA levels. E6 and E7 cooperate, each with a separate role, to produce this increase, which occurs as early as 24 h after infection of normal HKc. Acute expression of HPV16 E7 alone, HPV16 E5 alone, or HPV6 E6 does not increase EGFR mRNA levels.
In a subset of normal HKc strains, acute expression of HPV16 E6 alone produces an increase in EGFR levels independently of immortalization. The effect of E6 on EGFR levels was variable among different HKc strains, being detectable in
44% of the normal HKc strains we analyzed. The bases of this variability in the responses to E6 have been intensely investigated in our laboratory. The demonstration of E6 mRNA expression and efficient p53 degradation in individual normal HKc strains that did not respond to E6 ruled out the possibility of a failure to express functional E6 in the nonresponsive cells, and it may indicate either that E6-induced EGFR overexpression is independent of p53 degradation or that p53 degradation is overcome by other mechanisms in the nonresponders. Responsiveness to E6 correlated with basal levels of EGFR expression: nonresponders had relatively high levels of EGFR expression, whereas the strains that responded to E6 with an EGFR increase expressed comparatively lower basal levels of EGFR mRNA and protein. It must be noted here that, in high- and low-expressors alike, the levels of EGFR decrease dramatically in normal HKc as the cells approach senescence. In addition, as they approach senescence, HKc are more difficult to transduce with retroviruses, given their limited proliferative potential, and become more difficult to transfect and refractory to immortalization by full-length HPV16 DNA. Therefore, we sought to ensure that the variability of EGFR levels we detected was constitutive and not linked to the age of the culture. For this reason, all experiments were conducted using primary cultures from 1-day-old skin specimens. An additional assurance that EGFR levels are constitutively different in individual HKc strains derives from the observation that EGFR staining varies dramatically among foreskin specimens derived from different donors and among normal HKc strains from different donors in culture. Therefore, we are confident that the difference in levels of EGFR expression that correlates with E6 responsiveness is an intrinsic property of the individual HKc strains, distinct from variations in EGFR mRNA levels associated with culture conditions or senescence.
The fact that E6 is unable to produce EGFR overexpression in cells that already express high levels of this receptor indicated to us that EGFR levels (and therefore, we assume, EGFR signaling) are tightly regulated in normal HKc, and that E6 alone is unable to overcome the mechanisms that prevent an excess of EGFR signaling. To confirm this hypothesis, we overexpressed the EGFR in normal HKc by infection with an LXSN-EGFR retrovirus and determined that EGFR overexpression was linked to a marked decrease in proliferation and to early senescence. These results are in agreement with observations made in other primary cell systems. For example, in normal human fibroblasts, "excessive" ras or EGFR signaling is conducive not to increased proliferation but to early senescence (Refs. 13 14 and references therein). Whether EGFR overexpression in normal HKc causes growth arrest, apoptosis, or early senescence is currently under investigation, however these results provide strong evidence that normal HKc tightly regulate EGFR levels/signaling.
These results show that HPV16-mediated immortalization is constantly associated with a disruption of the normal regulation of EGFR levels, strongly suggesting that EGFR increases do play a role in immortalization. Transfection with full-length HPV16 DNA invariably produces a robust increase in EGFR levels in normal HKc, and EGFR levels in HKc immortalized with E7 alone were as high as in those immortalized by LXSN/16E6E7; therefore, we suspected that E7 may disrupt such regulation mechanisms. This suspicion was confirmed by the observations that acute expression of E6 and E7 together increased EGFR levels in two normal HKc strains unresponsive to E6 alone, and that EGFR levels increased in cells with extended life span expressing E7 alone. Current studies in our laboratory are aimed at clarifying further the mechanisms by which E6 increases EGFR levels, the contribution of E7 to this pathway, and the functional role of these activities in immortalization.
These results, together with previous work of our laboratory and others, strongly support a role of EGFR increases at different stages of HPV16-mediated transformation of HKc and imply that high levels of EGFR are important in HPV16-mediated immortalization and in the in vitro progression of HPV16-immortalized human epithelial cells. Increases in EGFR levels are common in human cancer, including cervical cancer (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
. Whereas in some cases the increase is a consequence of EGFR gene amplification, in stage I and II cervical cancer, the EGFR is more often overexpressed in the absence of gene amplification (23)
. In precancerous cervical lesions, both an increase in total expression levels and an abnormal distribution of EGFR within the differentiating epithelia has been demonstrated, with a loss of the preferential basal expression we also see in normal human foreskin (Fig. 5)
and a more uniform distribution of EGFR staining throughout the entire epithelium (17)
. Most importantly, EGFR overexpression in cervical squamous cell carcinomas has been recently linked with a more aggressive clinical behavior and decreased disease-free survival (21
, 23
, 24)
. However, no correlation of high EGFR staining with the levels of expression of HPV oncoproteins has yet been made in cervical cancer specimens. Clues as to the possible mechanisms by which E6/E7 affect EGFR levels may be derived from a recent study of HeLa cells, where decreased expression of HPV18 E6/E7 obtained by the means of an antisense E6/E7 construct dramatically reduced both EGFR protein levels and proliferation (22)
. Interestingly, the same effect was elicited by overexpression of Rb (22)
indicating that the effect of E7 on EGFR overexpression is mediated by Rb. However, in the same report, the reduction of EGFR levels caused by antisense E6/E7 or Rb occurred at the protein level with no changes in EGFR mRNA levels (22)
. This is quite different from what we observe with HPV16 E6/E7 in foreskin HKc. Therefore, additional studies are needed before conclusions reached using one experimental system can be applied to another. It will be of interest to explore whether overexpression of the EGFR correlates with the levels of expression of viral oncoproteins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and whether these parameters can be used as biomarkers for risk of squamous intraepithelial lesion progression.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grant RO1-CA62094 (to L. P.). ![]()
2 Presented in preliminary form at the 17th International Papillomavirus Conference in Charleston, SC, January 915, 1999. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Building 4, Room C-5, Columbia, SC 29208. Phone: (803) 733-3147; Fax: (803) 733-1515; E-mail: pirisi{at}med.sc.edu ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: HPV, human papillomavirus; HKc, human keratinocytes; HKc/HPV16, human keratinocytes immortalized with HPV16; EGF, epidermal growth factor; BPE, bovine pituitary extract; HKc/GFI, growth-factor independent human keratinocytes; HKc/DR, differentiation-resistant human keratinocytes; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LB medium, Luria-Bertani medium; GFDM, growth factor-depleted medium, lacking EGF and BPE; RPA, ribonuclease protection assay; ORF, open reading frame; PD, population doublings; Rb, Retinoblastoma Gene Product. ![]()
5 The unexpected bands of lower molecular weight produced by this EGFR probe with HKc/HPV16 and HKc/GFI mRNA (Fig. 1A)
were mapped to two alternatively spliced EGFR mRNA forms. We have characterized these EGFR splice variants and found that their levels increase relative to the levels of wild-type EGFR mRNA in established HPV16-immortalized HKc but not in HKc acutely expressing HPV16 E6, E7, or E6 and E7 together (J. Liao, T. S. W. Engin, X. Xu, and L. Pirisi, manuscript in preparation). ![]()
6 G. S. Akerman, E. Mourateva, and L. Pirisi, unpublished observation. ![]()
Received 5/ 8/00. Accepted 3/ 1/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-difluoromethylornithine chemoprevention trial. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 1383-1391, 1998.[Abstract]
expression in relationship to HPV status and KI-67 distribution in cervical intraepithelial neoplasms. Int. J. Cancer, 69: 165-169, 1996.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. K.S. Ku, D. C. Nguyen, M. Karaman, P. Gill, J. G. Hacia, and D. L. Crowe Loss of p53 Expression Correlates with Metastatic Phenotype and Transcriptional Profile in a New Mouse Model of Head and Neck Cancer Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 5(4): 351 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J.S. Simonson, M. J. Difilippantonio, and P. F. Lambert Two Distinct Activities Contribute to Human Papillomavirus 16 E6's Oncogenic Potential Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8266 - 8273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Genther Williams, G. L. Disbrow, R. Schlegel, D. Lee, D. W. Threadgill, and P. F. Lambert Requirement of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor for Hyperplasia Induced by E5, a High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Oncogene Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6534 - 6542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takaoka, H. Harada, C. D. Andl, K. Oyama, Y. Naomoto, K. L. Dempsey, A. J. Klein-Szanto, W. S. El-Deiry, A. Grimberg, and H. Nakagawa Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Regulates Aberrant Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 3 Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7711 - 7723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Sah, S. Balasubramanian, R. L. Eckert, and E. A. Rorke Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathway: EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT INHIBITION OF ERK1/2 AND AKT KINASES J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12755 - 12762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fehrmann, D. J. Klumpp, and L. A. Laimins Human Papillomavirus Type 31 E5 Protein Supports Cell Cycle Progression and Activates Late Viral Functions upon Epithelial Differentiation J. Virol., March 1, 2003; 77(5): 2819 - 2831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Almadori, G. Cadoni, P. Cattani, J. Galli, F. Bussu, G. Ferrandina, G. Scambia, G. Fadda, and M. Maurizi Human Papillomavirus Infection and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Primary Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 7(12): 3988 - 3993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |