| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrinology |
and ß
Discovery Research Department, EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, Maryland 20850
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as compared with E2 and other E2 metabolites and antagonists, and we demonstrate that the affinity of 2ME2 for ERß is even lower. When assessed in the presence of galangin, a cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitor, at concentrations at which 2ME2 interacts with ER
in an in vitro binding assay, it does not stimulate the proliferation of an estrogen-dependent breast carcinoma cell line. Similar IC50 values for inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis are obtained in estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent human breast cancer cell lines, irrespective of the expression of ER
and ERß. Moreover, the estrogen antagonist ICI 182,780 does not inhibit the antiproliferative activity of 2ME2. In E2-responsive cells such as MCF-7 and human umbilical vascular endothelial cells, high levels of E2 inhibit the antiproliferative activity of ICI 182,780 but not of 2ME2. Collectively, these results suggest that 2ME2 is distinct among estradiol metabolites because of its inability to engage ERs as an agonist, and its unique antiproliferative and apoptotic activities are mediated independently of ER
and ERß. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A critical question for the development of this metabolite of E2 as a therapeutic agent is whether 2ME2 can engage ERs with a functional consequence. Previous studies have shown that at doses at which E2 and other estradiol metabolites are active, 2ME2 does not induce many of the activities associated with estrogens, such as uterine growth (12
, 13)
, induction of estrus phase in ovariectomized animals, reduction of seminal vesicles, and inhibition of leukopoiesis (10)
. In addition, 2ME2 does not sustain tumor growth of a xenograft of H-301 cells, an estrogen-dependent hamster kidney cell line. In a model for estrogen-induced carcinogenicity, where several other estradiol derivatives are active, 2ME2 is not able to induce tumor formation (11)
. The striking absence of functional estrogenic activity by 2ME2 under these conditions is consistent with its 2000-fold lower affinity than estradiol for the uterine cytosolic ER (12)
. The affinity of 2ME2 for ERß, a recently identified ER (21)
has not been reported. In the present study we investigate the relationship between ERs and the mechanism of action of 2ME2 by determining the binding to recombinant human ER
and ERß, by evaluating whether ER antagonists or agonists influence the activity of 2ME2, and by assessing whether at the appropriate concentration it may act as an agonist of ERs. Our findings indicate that 2ME2 is truly unique among E2 metabolites because there is no evident functional interaction between 2ME2 and the ERs, and the latter do not play a role in the antiproliferative mechanism of 2ME2.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Receptor Binding Studies.
Binding studies were performed by displacement of [3H]estradiol from baculovirus-expressed recombinant human ER
and ERß at 0.5 nM E2, using 1.0 µM diethylstilbestrol to calculate the nonspecific binding. The assays were performed by MDS Panlabs, Bothell, WA, under the conditions described in Obourn et al. (23)
. Ki values were calculated using the equation of Cheng and Prusoff (24)
using the observed IC50 of the tested compound, the concentration of radioligand in the assay, and the historical value for the Kd of the ligand obtained experimentally at MDS Panlabs.
Cell Culture.
HUVEC were obtained from Clonetics (San Diego, CA), MCF7 cells were the kind gift of Dr. Dorraya El Ashry (Georgetown University, Washington, DC), and MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. HUVEC cultures were maintained for up to five passages in endothelial growth medium containing bovine brain extract (Clonetics) and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). The breast carcinoma cell lines were maintained in DMEM/F12 (1:1) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT) and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic. MCF7 cells were used between passage 60 and passage 90.
Proliferation Assays.
Proliferation was measured by cell counting using a Coulter Z1 cell counter (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, FL) or by evaluation of DNA synthesis. Each condition was done in triplicate, and experiments were repeated at least twice. For MCF7 estrogen-dependent proliferation assay the cells were seeded in complete medium at 2030,000 cells/well in a 24-well plate. After allowing the cells to adhere overnight the seeding density was determined by cell counts. Cells were washed with PBS (37°C), and starved by placing them in Improved Minimal Essential Medium-phenol red-free medium containing 2% charcoal-dextran fetal bovine-stripped serum (Georgetown University) and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic. After 3 days of starvation, cells were treated with or without increasing concentrations of compounds, replacing the medium every 23 days and counted after 8 or 10 days of treatment. To ensure that only the added test compounds stimulated growth, experiments were performed only with cell cultures that duplicated less than once during the starvation period.
For HUVEC and MDA-MB-435 proliferation assays, cells were plated at 20,000 cells/well. The next day cells were treated with or without increasing concentrations of compound for 72 h and then counted.
Detection of DNA synthesis was performed by use of the BrdUrd cell proliferation colorimetric ELISA kit from Roche (Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturers instructions. For BrdUrd assays, the cells were seeded at 5000 cells/well in a 96-well plate, allowed to attach overnight, and then exposed to the compound for 48 h.
Apoptosis Assays.
Apoptosis was measured by quantitation of cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments using the cell death detection ELISA kit from Roche according to manufacturers instructions. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 24-well plates (20,000 MCF7 cells/well, 5,000 MDA-MB-435 cells/well, or 5,000 MDA-MB-231 cells/well), allowed to attach overnight, and then exposed to the appropriate drug for 96 h for MCF7 cells, and 48 h for MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231 cells.
Inhibition of CYP450 Enzymes Activity.
Inhibition of baculovirus-expressed recombinant human CYP450 enzymes was performed by Gentest (Woburn, MA) using specific substrates. In brief, dealkylation of the specific substrates by the various enzymes was assessed in the presence and absence of galangin or a known specific inhibitor (positive control) after incubation with the appropriate cofactors (NADP, glucose-6-phosphate, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase). Enzymatic activity was followed by the increase in fluorescence of the dealkylated substrates. The following enzyme: substrate pairs were assessed: CYP1A1:7-benzoyloxyresorufin, CYP1B1:7-benzoyloxyresorufin, CYP1A2:3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin, CYP2C9:7-methoxy4-trifluoromethylcoumarin, CYP2C19: 3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin, and CYP2D6:3-[2-(N,N-diethyl-N-methylamino)ethyl]-7-methoxy-4-methylcoumarin, and for CYP3A4, both reorufin benzyl ether and 7-benzyloxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß.
and ERß. Binding studies using recombinant proteins showed that 2ME2 has a Ki of 21 nM for ER
and a Ki of 417 nM for ERß. Thus, 2ME2 has a 500- and 3200-fold lower affinity than estradiol for ER
and ERß, respectively (Table 1)
and demonstrates that the affinity for ERß is even lower. Consistent with previous reports, E2, and the ER antagonists ICI 182,780 (25)
and tamoxifen (26)
have binding affinities within the same order of magnitude.
|
+, ERß+; Ref. 27
) requires estrogen stimulation for growth. Cells are allowed to achieve quiescence by culturing them in charcoal dextran-stripped serum and then incubating them with increasing concentrations of compound for several days; proliferation is determined by cell counts. The cells in the charcoal dextran-stripped serum do not proliferate and remain at approximately the seeding density throughout the assay period. Increasing concentrations of E2 result in a proliferative response with a peak stimulation at 1 nM E2 (Fig. 1A)
40% of the maximal E2 proliferative response (Fig. 1C)
|
The concentrations of galangin that inhibit the proliferative response induced by 2ME2 are in the same range as the IC50 values of galangin for several well-characterized CYP450 enzymes (Table 2)
. Because galangin under these conditions did not inhibit E2-stimulated proliferation (Fig. 1C)
, its effects on 2ME2 are specific and not attributable to an impairment of the cells to proliferate. However, it was still possible that galangin-inhibited 2ME2 sustained proliferation by interfering with other processes specifically associated with 2ME2 stimulation, apart from inhibition of metabolism. To evaluate this possibility, we assessed the effect of galangin on the proliferation sustained by 2PE2, a closely related nonhydrolyzable analogue of 2ME2 (22)
, which also stimulates proliferation of MCF7 cells at low concentrations and has antiproliferative effects at concentrations approaching the micromolar range (Fig. 1D)
. Galangin does not affect the response of this nonhydrolyzable analogue, indicating that contrary to 2ME2, the proliferative activity of 2PE2 is intrinsic to this molecule and suggesting that the metabolism in 2ME2 that renders it estrogenic may be associated with the 2-position. The IC50 value of 2PE2 as an antiproliferative agent is not affected by the CYP450 inhibitor (Fig. 1D)
. On the other hand, the shift to lower concentrations in the IC50 value of 2ME2 as an antiproliferative agent by galangin (Fig. 1B)
is consistent with the maintenance of a higher concentration of 2ME2 and/or a diminished production of a stimulatory metabolite, potentially 2HO-E2. In conclusion, the absence of a proliferative response, in the presence of a CYP450 inhibitor, at concentrations that are in the range of binding ERs suggests that 2ME2 cannot engage an ER as an agonist.
|
|
protein (data not shown). Although we tried several commercially available antibodies, we could not detect expression of ERß at the protein level in any of our cell types. ICI 182,780 has much greater affinity for ERs than 2ME2 (Table 1)
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2ME2 is also unique among the major natural metabolites of estradiol, because it has the lowest affinity for the ERs and distinct biological activities (12)
. In addition, the affinity of 2ME2 for ERß is significantly lower than for ER
(Table 1)
. The majority of the molecules that bind the ERs bind both subtypes with similar affinities; however some of the synthetic E2 and naturally occurring steroidal ligands have different relative binding affinities for ER
compared with ERß (26
, 35)
. 2ME2 is unusual in that E2 metabolism occurs mainly by oxidation at the A and D rings, and subsequent methylation by the ubiquitous catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme (2
, 28)
. Several reports have investigated various estradiol metabolites for their ability to inhibit cellular proliferation, and whereas there are differences in their activities on the various cell types, 2ME2 consistently exhibits the greatest antiproliferative activity (Refs. 4
, 36
, 37
; data not shown). 2HO-E2 for comparison can act as an ER agonist but also has been shown to cause inhibition of cellular proliferation in smooth muscle cells, follicular granulosa cells, cardiac fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and tumor cell lines (20
, 38, 39, 40)
. We have also found that 2HO-E2 can inhibit the growth of tumor and endothelial cells in vitro, but in all of the cell types tested 2ME2 has greater antiproliferative effect. Conversely and in contrast to 2ME2 we did not observe apoptosis induced by 2HO-E2, suggesting a different mechanism for the inhibitory effects of these two metabolites of E2 (data not shown). Lottering et al. (41)
reported that exposure of cells to 2ME2 or 2HO-E2 resulted in different patterns of protein phosphorylation, additionally supporting the hypothesis that 2ME2 and 2HO-E2 use distinct signaling pathways. On the other hand, some reports suggest that the inhibitory activities associated with 2HO-E2 could be avoided by preventing its conversion to 2ME2 (34
, 42)
.
Interestingly, at high concentrations (>10 µM) E2 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis. These activities are not inhibited by ICI 182,780 (data not shown) suggesting that it is not through an ER-mediated pathway. However, it is unclear whether E2 at high concentrations is able to bind the molecular target for 2ME2 and if the antiproliferative activities of E2 are mediated through the 2ME2 pathway.
In the presence of the CYP450 enzymes inhibitor, galangin, 2ME2 cannot stimulate the proliferation of MCF7 cells, suggesting that it cannot engage ERs as an agonist. Furthermore, galangin inhibits numerous CYP450 enzymes in the range of concentrations at which it inhibits proliferation sustained by 2ME2 (compare Table 2
and Fig. 1
). Under similar conditions, the proliferation sustained by other agents is not affected (Fig. 1, C and D)
. These data are consistent with a metabolite of 2ME2 being responsible for the proliferative activity observed in the absence of galangin. NADPH-dependent CYP450 enzymes hydroxylate estradiol and can demethylate 2ME2, either process resulting in the production of 2HO-E2 (29
, 30)
. The different outcome that galangin has on the IC50 values for 2ME2 and 2PE2 is also consistent with a specific effect of galangin at the 2-position of 2ME2 (compare Figs. 1, B and D
). However, attempts using high-performance liquid chromatography (43)
or microsomes to identify 2HO-E2 in the supernatant or the cell extracts from cells cultured in the absence of galangin have not been successful. In preclinical toxicology studies in rats and dogs administered oral daily doses as high as 1800 mg/m2/day for 28 days, 2ME2 induced reversible hepatic changes in rats, and reversible estradiol-like changes to the reproductive system in both rats and dogs (44)
. Interestingly, the in vivo estrogenic activity in different species correlates with the ability of liver microsomes of the same species to induce rapid and extensive conversion of 2ME2 into 2HO-E2 and 2-hydroxyestrone.3
These data also suggest in vivo a correlation between the estrogenic activity of 2ME2 observed in some tissues at very high doses and its demethylation to 2HO-E2. The lack of intrinsic estrogenic activity of 2ME2 and its ability to inhibit cell proliferation independently of ERs indicate that it would be possible to generate analogs that could not be converted enzymatically into estrogenic derivatives and still maintain its antiproliferative activity.
E2 regulates a wide variety of physiological responses including activity on reproductive tissue, cardiovascular system, and bone metabolism. 2ME2 does share many of the activities of estrogens on the cardiovascular system and bone metabolism. 2ME2, like E2, may exert cardioprotective effects by increasing prostacyclin synthesis and by lowering cholesterol levels in serum (45
, 46) , and at least some of the cardioprotective effects of 2ME2 have been shown to be ER-independent (47)
. In intact young rats, 2ME2 treatment results in a reduction of the growth plate and the rate of longitudinal bone growth. E2 treatment of intact young rats results in a similar activity; however, E2 but not 2ME2 treatment results in inhibition of radial bone growth and cancellous bone turnover (46)
. On the other hand, in ovariectomized rats 2ME2 mimics all of the effects of E2 on bone metabolism but at concentrations 10100-fold lower than what is necessary for optimal inhibition of tumor growth.4
Interestingly, the cardioprotective and bone metabolism effects of 2ME2 are observed at doses that show low antitumor activity and do not produce the reversible E2-like activities on reproductive tissue observed in the preclinical toxicology studies (1
, 45)
.4
Several studies suggest that the E2 responses on the reproductive and cardiovascular systems are mediated through the classical nuclear receptors (45
, 48
, 49)
. The effects of 2ME2 on bones and cholesterol levels resemble the activity of selective estrogen response modifiers (50)
. However, contrary to the selective estrogen response modifiers, 2ME2 has much lower affinity and does not engage the ERs. Additionally, 2ME2 does not bind other steroid nuclear receptors with high affinity (data not shown). Our studies have not addressed whether 2ME2 engages any of the nuclear orphan receptors. This is particularly interesting because it has been shown recently that the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol interacts with the orphan nuclear receptor ERRs, and this has a functional consequence on the differentiation of trophoblast cells (51)
. The ERRs were identified based on their sequence homology to the ER
. ERRs are not activated by natural estrogens and their activities are not influenced by antiestrogens. Additional studies are required to determine whether 2ME2 is engaging these receptors.
Collectively, in this study we show that 2ME2 is not an agonist for the ERs and demonstrate that its antiproliferative activity is mediated independently of ER
and ERß.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Discovery Research Department, EntreMed, Inc., 9640 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Phone: (240) 864-2600; Fax: (240) 864-2601; E-mail: victorp{at}entremed.com ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: 2ME2, 2-methoxyestradiol; CYP450, cytochrome P450; E2, 17ß-estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; 2HO-E2, 2-hydroxyestradiol; 2PE2, 2-(1-propynyl)estradiol; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; ERR, estrogen-related receptor. ![]()
4 J. Sibonga, G. Evans, S. Lotinun, V. Pribluda, S. Green, and R. Turner. The Effects of 2-methoxyestradiol on the tibial histomorphometry of the ovariectomized growing rat, submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 4/25/01. Accepted 4/25/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß. Endocrinology, 138: 863-870, 1997.
-dihydrotestosterone, gonadotropins and catecholamines. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 64: 119-126, 1989.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Parada-Bustamante, P. A Orihuela, M. Rios, P. A Navarrete-Gomez, C. A Cuevas, L. A Velasquez, M. J Villalon, and H. B Croxatto Catechol-O-Methyltransferase and Methoxyestradiols Participate in the Intraoviductal Nongenomic Pathway Through Which Estradiol Accelerates Egg Transport in Cycling Rats Biol Reprod, December 1, 2007; 77(6): 934 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chang, K.-w. Peng, I. Kastrati, C. R. Overk, Z.-H. Qin, P. Yao, J. L. Bolton, and G. R. J. Thatcher Activation of Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Gene Transcription by the Equine Estrogen Metabolite, 4-Methoxyequilenin, in Human Breast Cancer Cells Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4793 - 4802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bourghardt, G. Bergstrom, A. Krettek, S. Sjoberg, J. Boren, and A. Tivesten The Endogenous Estradiol Metabolite 2-Methoxyestradiol Reduces Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation in Female Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4128 - 4132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kato, A. Sadarangani, S. Lange, M. Villalon, J. Branes, J. J Brosens, G. I Owen, and M. Cuello The oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol alone or in combination with tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand mediates apoptosis in cancerous but not healthy cells of the human endometrium Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 351 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Eichenlaub-Ritter, U. Winterscheidt, E. Vogt, Y. Shen, H.-R. Tinneberg, and R. Sorensen 2-Methoxyestradiol Induces Spindle Aberrations, Chromosome Congression Failure, and Nondisjunction in Mouse Oocytes Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 784 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gui, H. Yin, J.-Y. He, S.-H. Yang, M. P. Walsh, and X.-L. Zheng Endoreduplication of human smooth muscle cells induced by 2-methoxyestradiol: a role for cyclin-dependent kinase 2 Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1313 - H1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Gooden, J. C. Schroeder, K. E. North, M. D. Gammon, K. E. Hartmann, J. Taylor, and D. D. Baird Val153Met Polymorphism of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase and Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyomata Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2007; 14(2): 117 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bhati, Y. Gokmen-Polar, G. W. Sledge Jr., C. Fan, H. Nakshatri, D. Ketelsen, C. H. Borchers, M. J. Dial, C. Patterson, and N. Klauber-DeMore 2-Methoxyestradiol Inhibits the Anaphase-Promoting Complex and Protein Translation in Human Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 702 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Seli, O. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, H. Cakmak, U. A. Kayisli, B. Selam, and A. Arici Estradiol Increases Apoptosis in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells by Up-Regulating Fas and Fas Ligand Expression J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 4995 - 5001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zou, M. Adachi, K. Imai, M. Hareyama, K. Yoshioka, S. Zhao, and Y. Shinomura 2-Methoxyestradiol, an Endogenous Mammalian Metabolite, Radiosensitizes Colon Carcinoma Cells through c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6532 - 6539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Basu, V. P. Castle, M. Bouziane, K. Bhalla, and S. Haldar Crosstalk between Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cell Death Pathways in Pancreatic Cancer: Synergistic Action of Estrogen Metabolite and Ligands of Death Receptor Family. Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 66(8): 4309 - 4318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-I. Huh, A. Calvo, R. Charles, and J. E. Green Distinct tumor stage-specific inhibitory effects of 2-methoxyestradiol in a breast cancer mouse model associated with id-1 expression. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3495 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A Taylor, P. Cowin, J. F. Couse, K. S. Korach, and G. P. Risbridger 17{beta}-Estradiol Induces Apoptosis in the Developing Rodent Prostate Independently of ER{alpha} or ER{beta} Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 191 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gao, M. Rahmani, X. Shi, P. Dent, and S. Grant Synergistic antileukemic interactions between 2-medroxyestradiol (2-ME) and histone deacetylase inhibitors involve Akt down-regulation and oxidative stress Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gokmen-Polar, D. Escuin, C. D. Walls, S. E. Soule, Y. Wang, K. L. Sanders, T. M. LaVallee, M. Wang, B. D. Guenther, P. Giannakakou, et al. {beta}-Tubulin Mutations Are Associated with Resistance to 2-Methoxyestradiol in MDA-MB-435 Cancer Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9406 - 9414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sidor, R. D'Amato, K. D. Miller, A. Stewart, T. E. Sutherland, M. Schuliga, T. Harris, L. Quan, D. McAllister, B. Pool, et al. The Potential and Suitability of 2-Methoxyestradiol in Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 6094 - 6096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Davoodpour and M. Landstrom 2-Methoxyestradiol-induced Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells Requires Smad7 J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14773 - 14779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Reed, A. Purohit, L. W. L. Woo, S. P. Newman, and B. V. L. Potter Steroid Sulfatase: Molecular Biology, Regulation, and Inhibition Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 171 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Sutherland, M. Schuliga, T. Harris, B. L. Eckhardt, R. L. Anderson, L. Quan, and A. G. Stewart 2-Methoxyestradiol Is an Estrogen Receptor Agonist That Supports Tumor Growth in Murine Xenograft Models of Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1722 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Lens, I. Rosdahl, A. Ahlbom, B. Y. Farahmand, I. Synnerstad, B. Boeryd, and J. A. Newton Bishop Effect of Pregnancy on Survival in Women With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 22(21): 4369 - 4375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Ju, L. M. Clausen, K. F. Allred, A. L. Almada, and W. G. Helferich {beta}-Sitosterol, {beta}-Sitosterol Glucoside, and a Mixture of {beta}-Sitosterol and {beta}-Sitosterol Glucoside Modulate the Growth of Estrogen-Responsive Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro and in Ovariectomized Athymic Mice J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1145 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Ciobanu, V. Luu-The, C. Martel, F. Labrie, and D. Poirier Inhibition of Estrone Sulfate-induced Uterine Growth by Potent Nonestrogenic Steroidal Inhibitors of Steroid Sulfatase Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6442 - 6446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Auborn, S. Fan, E. M. Rosen, L. Goodwin, A. Chandraskaren, D. E. Williams, D. Chen, and T. H. Carter Indole-3-Carbinol Is a Negative Regulator of Estrogen J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2470S - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dawling, N. Roodi, and F. F. Parl Methoxyestrogens Exert Feedback Inhibition on Cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1B1 Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3127 - 3132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chauhan, G. Li, D. Auclair, T. Hideshima, P. Richardson, K. Podar, N. Mitsiades, C. Mitsiades, C. Li, R. S. Kim, et al. Identification of genes regulated by 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) in multiple myeloma cells using oligonucleotide arrays Blood, May 1, 2003; 101(9): 3606 - 3614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Sibonga, S. Lotinun, G. L. Evans, V. S. Pribluda, S. J. Green, and R. T. Turner Dose-Response Effects of 2-Methoxyestradiol on Estrogen Target Tissues in the Ovariectomized Rat Endocrinology, March 1, 2003; 144(3): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. LaVallee, X. H. Zhan, M. S. Johnson, C. J. Herbstritt, G. Swartz, M. S. Williams, W. A. Hembrough, S. J. Green, and V. S. Pribluda 2-Methoxyestradiol Up-Regulates Death Receptor 5 and Induces Apoptosis through Activation of the Extrinsic Pathway Cancer Res., January 15, 2003; 63(2): 468 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |