Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010 Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurie, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurie, J. M.
[Cancer Research 62, 3945-3949, July 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research

Advances in Brief

Loss of Retinoic Acid Receptor ß Gene Expression Is Linked to Aberrant Histone H3 Acetylation in Lung Cancer Cell Lines1

Young-Ah Suh2, Ho-Young Lee2, Arvind Virmani, Jiemin Wong, Koren K. Mann, Wilson H. Miller, Jr., Adi Gazdar and Jonathan M. Kurie3

Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [Y-A. S., H-Y. L., J. M. K.]; Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, The University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9593 [A. V., A. G.]; Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 [J. W.]; and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital and the Department of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada [K. K. M., W. H. M.]


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Most lung cancer cell lines do not express retinoic acid receptor (RAR)-ß in response to all-trans retinoic acid (RA) because of a defect in RARß gene transcription(RA-refractory cells). Here we investigated mechanisms of RA refractoriness in 14 lung cancer cell lines. Eleven cell lines were found to be RA refractory, and in the other three cell lines, RARß levels increased with RA treatment (RA-responsive cells). We observed RARß promoter methylation in 7 of 11 RA-refractory cell lines (64%) and in 0 of the 3 RA-responsive cell lines. Treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine restored RA response in two of the seven cell lines with RARß promoter methylation (29%). RA treatment increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 on chromatin of the RARß promoter in RA-responsive cells. Only histone H4 acetylation increased in RA-refractory cells, including refractory cells with and without evidence of promoter methylation. Thus, loss of histone H3 acetylation consistently correlated with RA refractoriness in lung cancer cell lines. RA refractoriness and aberrant histone acetylation were attributable to RARß promoter methylation in some cell lines but not in others, suggesting that multiple mechanisms contribute to this transcriptional defect in lung cancer cells.


   Introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
All-trans-RA4 is a ligand for the RA nuclear receptor family (RAR{alpha}, RARß, and RAR{gamma}). RARs function as heterodimers with RXRs and regulate the transcription of genes with RAREs in their promoters, such as RARß (1) . Nuclear receptors regulate gene transcription through association with coregulators that maintain local chromatin structure in either a repressive or permissive state. In the absence of ligand, RXR-RAR complexes actively repress transcription by association with receptor corepressors, which recruit histone deacetylases to create a multimeric repressor complex (2) . Upon binding to ligand, the receptors dissociate from the corepressors and bind to receptor coactivators, which have intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity and facilitate the recruitment of RNA polymerase II and the basal transcription machinery (3) . In most lung cancer cell lines and tumor biopsy specimens, RARß mRNA is not detectable, and RA treatment does not increase RARß gene transcription (4, 5, 6, 7) . Recently, methylated CpG islands were identified adjacent to the RARE in the RARß promoter (8) . DNA methylation is a common epigenetic mechanism of tumor suppressor gene silencing in cancer (9) . The biological consequences of DNA methylation are mediated by a family of methyl-CpG binding domain proteins that interact with a histone deacetylase-containing core complex via recruitment of the Sin3 corepressor (10) . Here we investigated mechanisms of RARß loss in lung cancer cells. We found that loss of histone H3 acetylation on chromatin of the RARß promoter consistently correlated with RA refractoriness in lung cancer cell lines. DNA methylation contributed to aberrant histone acetylation in some cell lines but not in others, suggesting that multiple mechanisms contribute to this transcriptional defect in lung cancer cells.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture.
We tested the following 14 lung cancer cell lines: Calu-1, H226B, H226Br, SK-MES-1, H322, H358, H441, H460, H1299, Calu-6, A549, H596, H661, and H1607 (11) . Lung cancer cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) containing 10% FCS and antibiotics at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Northern Blot Analysis.
Lung cancer cells were seeded onto 10-cm plates (106 cells) and treated for 12 h with 10-6M RA or medium alone, and total RNA was extracted. Twenty µg of RNA were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing 2% formaldehyde. After gels were soaked in 50 mM NaOH/1x SSC for 20 min and then soaked in 10x SSC for 20 min, RNA was transferred onto a Zeta-Probe membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) overnight by the capillary transfer method. Membranes were cross-linked and then incubated in the hybridization solution containing [{gamma}-32P]dCTP-labeled probe. The probe was labeled using a Prime-It II Random Primer Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and purified by MicroSpin S-300 HR Columns (Amersham Phamacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ). After overnight incubation, membranes were washed under high-stringency condition and exposed to enhanced chemiluminescence films for autoradiography.

MSP Assay.
The MSP assay was performed as described by Virmani et al. (8) , which was a modification of previously described methods (12) , in which a 146-bp, CpG-rich genomic region (position 950-1076) adjacent to the two RAREs (positions 792–797 and 803–808) was amplified. Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with 200 µg/ml proteinase K (Life Technologies, Inc.) and purified by phenol extraction. Then, 1 µg of DNA was denatured by incubation with 0.2 M NaOH for 10 min at 37°C, 30 µl of 10 mM hydroquinone and 520 µl of 3 M sodium bisulfite (pH 5.0; both from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were added, and the solution was incubated at 50°C for 16 h. The treated DNA was then purified with a Wizard DNA Purification System (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified with primers specific for either methylated or unmethylated RARß promoter P2 as described elsewhere (8) . The PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels.

RT-PCR Analysis.
Lung cancer cells found to have methylation of the RARß promoter were seeded at a density of 106 cells/10-cm plate and incubated for 6 days in medium with 1 µM RA, 10 µM 5-Aza-CdR, or both (Sigma Chemical Co.), with medium changes on days 1, 3, and 5. Under these conditions, at the completion of treatment the cells had undergone at least 4 population doublings and were subconfluent (70–80%), permitting incorporation of 5-Aza-CdR throughout treatment. The cells were harvested at the end of the 6th day for extraction of total cellular RNA with the High Pure RNA Isolation kit, as described above. Reverse transcription was performed with RARß2- and GAPDH-specific primers. Five µl of reverse transcription reaction mixture was used as a template for PCR with nested primers for RARß. GAPDH primers were used to monitor the integrity of isolated RNA. The primers used for RT-PCR were as follows: 5'-TTATTGCACGAGTGGTGACTGACTGA-3' (antisense RARß); 5'-CAGACATTCAGTGCAAGGG AGATC-3' (sense RARß) and 5'-AATTTGGTCTGCGATGGTCCAGCC-3' (antisense RARß) for nested PCR; and 5'-CGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTAT-3' (sense GAPDH) and 5'-AGCCTTCTCCA TGGTGGTGGTGAAGAC-3' (antisense GAPDH). The amplified DNAs were separated on a 2% agarose gel and analyzed by Southern blotting with human RARß cDNA used as a probe.

ChIP Analysis.
ChIP analysis was performed as described elsewhere (13) . Briefly, lung cancer cells were treated for 12 h with 1 µM RA or medium alone. The cells were then cross-linked (histones to DNA) by adding formaldehyde directly to the culture medium (1% final concentration) for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were harvested and lysed with lysis buffer [25 mM Tris (pH 8.1),10 mM EDTA, and 1% SDS] containing protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was performed on extracts from equal numbers of cells with anti-acetyl-histone H3 or anti-acetyl-histone H4 antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY) overnight at 4°C, and immune complexes were isolated with salmon sperm DNA/protein A-agarose slurry (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.) as described previously (13) . Protein-bound immunoprecipitated DNA was washed with LiCl wash buffer and Tris-EDTA, and immune complexes were eluted by adding elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 N NaHCO3). The cross-links were reversed by treatment with 20 mM NaCl-1% SDS, and the DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. PCR was performed to amplify the RARß promoter with primers (antisense, 5'-AAACCCTGCTCGGATCGCTC-3'; sense, 5'-TCCTGGGAGTTGGTGATGTCAG-3') that amplify RARß promoter sequences from positions 732 to 979. PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 5 min to denature, 58°C for 1 min to anneal, and 72°C for 1 min to elongate, for 30 cycles. An aliquot of the whole cell protein-DNA complex (2% of immunoprecipitated volume) was subjected to PCR analysis as a control for input. The PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels and subjected to Southern blotting with a 1.6-kb PstI-BamHI human RARß genomic fragment including 1.47 kb of promoter sequences 5' of the TATA box.

Western Blot Analysis.
Exponentially growing (60% confluent) lung cancer cell lines were lysed in lysis buffer as described elsewhere (14) , and 50 µg of sample were used for Western blot analysis. Polyclonal antibodies against human TIF2, SRC1, RAC3, SMRT, and NcoR were generated and used in Western blotting as described previously (15) . Dr. Sharon Roth (The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center) generously provided polyclonal antibody against human GCN5, and we purchased antibody to CBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and actin (Sigma Chemical Co.).


   Results
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
RARß Promoter Methylation.
We performed MSP analysis to examine the methylation status of the RARß gene promoter in a panel of 14 lung cancer cell lines. In two independent experiments, we found RARß promoter methylation in 7 of the 14 lung cancer cell lines tested, which included cell lines of multiple histologies (Table 1)Citation . We also examined RARß expression in response to RA treatment. Most cell lines expressed no detectable RARß in the basal state. RA treatment increased RARß expression in Calu-6, H661, and H1299 cells (RA-responsive cells), or 23% of the lung cancer cell lines examined (Fig. 1A)Citation . In the other 11 cell lines examined, RARß levels did not increase with RA treatment (RA-refractory cells; Fig. 1, A and CCitation ). In most RA-refractory cells, RARß mRNA was not detectable by Northern blotting, but in A549 and H460 cells, RARß was expressed basally and did not change with RA treatment. Of the RA-refractory cells, 64% (7 of 11 cell lines) had RARß promoter methylation. Thus, we observed RA refractoriness in cell lines with and without RARß promoter methylation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 MSP assay for RARß gene

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. A, RARß expression was examined by Northern blot analysis (20 µg total RNA/lane) of the indicated lung cancer cells treated with media alone (C) or 1 µM RA (R). A photograph of the ethidium bromide-stained gel illustrates relative amounts of RNA loaded/lane, with the indicated positions of 28S and 18S RNase bands. B, RARß promoter methylation in the RA-refractory cell lines H358 and H1607. The RA-responsive cell line Calu-6 was included as a negative control. Genomic DNA was subjected to MSP analysis, using unmethylated-specific (U) and methylated-specific (M) primers to the RARß gene as described in "Materials and Methods." Control PCR reactions were performed using no template DNA (N) with unmethylated-specific, methylated-specific, and no primers, respectively. MM, molecular weight marker. C, RT-PCR analysis of RARß and GAPDH expression was performed on RNA extracted from H358 and H1607 cells treated for 6 days with media alone (Lane 1), RA alone (Lane 2), 5-Aza-CdR alone (Lane 3), and RA plus 5-Aza-CdR (Lane 4). RARß- and GAPDH-specific PCR products were electrophoresed on an agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (illustrated in the bottom panels), transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized to a RARß cDNA (illustrated in the top panels). Molecular weight markers (MM) are indicated.

 
We examined the contribution of RARß promoter methylation to RA refractoriness. We treated the seven RA-refractory cell lines for 6 days with 5-Aza-CdR, RA, or both. Under these conditions, at the completion of treatment the cells had undergone at least 4 population doublings and were subconfluent (70–80%), permitting incorporation of 5-Aza-CdR throughout treatment. MSP analysis demonstrated that 5-Aza-CdR treatment decreased RARß promoter methylation by at least 50% but was still detectable (data not shown). Treatment with 5-Aza-CdR restored RA responsiveness in two of the seven cell lines (29%) with RARß promoter methylation (Fig. 1, B and C)Citation . Thus, 5-Aza-CdR treatment was sufficient to restore RA responsiveness in some cells with RARß promoter methylation, but not in others.

Receptor Coregulator Expression.
Previous studies have shown that RA refractoriness in lung cancer cells is not due to loss of specific RAR or RXR family members (4 , 6 , 7) . However, other components of the retinoid receptor complex, including coactivators and corepressors, have not been investigated in lung cancer cells. We tested the hypothesis that RA refractoriness is caused by coactivator loss or corepressor overexpression. We performed Western blot analysis of the coactivators TIF2, RAC3, BRG1, GCN5, and CBP and the corepressors SMRT and NcoR, all of which are known to associate with RXR, RAR, or both (16, 17, 18, 19) . In the case of BRG1, SMRT, CBP, and NcoR, we observed multiple immunoreactive bands (Fig. 2)Citation , perhaps because the mRNA products of these genes are alternatively spliced, and the protein products are phosphorylated (20, 21, 22) . The cell lines examined in this study expressed multiple coactivators. We detected CBP, BRG1, and GCN5 in all cell lines. The other coactivators (RAC3 and TIF2) were detected in fewer cell lines, including both RA-responsive and RA-refractory cells. Among the corepressors, we detected SMRT and NcoR in all cell lines except for the RA-refractory cell lines H460 and SK-MES-1. Thus, our findings did not support the hypothesis that RA refractoriness is secondary to loss of a specific coactivator or overexpression of a corepressor.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Western analysis of coactivators and corepressors. Fifty µg of cell lysates were prepared from the indicated lung cancer cell lines, loaded onto a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel, and immunoblotted to antibodies against the indicated proteins, including actin as a control for relative amounts of sample loaded/lane. RA-refractory cells are indicated by asterisks.

 
Histone Acetylation.
After binding to ligands, retinoid nuclear receptors recruit coactivators, which induce histone acetylation, chromatin remodeling, and assembly of the general transcription machinery. We hypothesized that in RA-refractory cells, RA treatment would not activate these events on the RARß promoter. ChIP analysis of the RA-responsive cell lines Calu-6 and H661 revealed that RA treatment increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the RARß promoter (Fig. 3)Citation . In contrast, RA treatment did not increase acetylation of histone H3 in any of the RA-refractory cell lines examined, whereas histone H4 acetylation increased in all of the RA-refractory cells except SK-MES-1. The RARß promoter was methylated in all of these RA-refractory cell lines except H322. Thus, we observed aberrant acetylation of RARß promoter-associated histones in RA-refractory cell lines with and without RARß promoter methylation.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. ChIP analysis was performed to examine whether RA treatment increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 on the RARß promoter in non-small cell lung cancer cells that are RA responsive (Calu-6 and H661) or RA refractory (H460, H358, H226Br, H441, SK-MES-1, and H322). Lung cancer cell lines were treated for 12 h with RA (+) or media alone (-). Protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked in the cells by treatment with formaldehyde. Cells were lysed, and lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-acetyl-histone H3 (A) or anti-acetyl-histone H4 (B) antibodies followed by PCR to amplify RARß promoter sequences. PCR products were subjected to Southern blotting using a RARß genomic fragment containing the promoter region as a probe. Inputs represent the relative amounts of protein-DNA complex subjected to immunoprecipitation; PCR analysis of the RARß gene promoter was performed on an aliquot of whole cell extract (2% of sample volume subjected to immunoprecipitation).

 

   Discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
REFERENCES
 
Several findings presented here provide evidence that RARß expression depends on DNA methylation in some lung cancer cell lines but not in others. First, 36% of RA-refractory cells had no evidence of RARß promoter methylation. Second, 5-Aza-CdR treatment restored RA responsiveness in only 29% of RA-refractory cells with RARß promoter methylation. An alternative interpretation of this finding is that RA refractoriness in the presence of 5-Aza-CdR is related to persistent RARß promoter methylation in these cells. Third, RA treatment induced aberrant histone acetylation at the RARß promoter in RA-refractory cells with and without RARß promoter methylation. Previous studies support a role for other mechanisms in RA refractoriness. Nur77, an orphan receptor that is overexpressed in lung cancer, heterodimerizes with RXR and competes with RXR-RAR complexes for binding to RAREs, blocking RA-induced expression of target genes (23) . Furthermore, RTK pathways, which are activated in lung cancer, can inhibit RXR-RAR transactivation through at least two mechanisms. RTK pathways stimulate the AP-1 transcription factor, which competes with RXR-RAR complexes for binding to the coactivator CBP, blocking coactivator recruitment to retinoid receptors (24) . Furthermore, RTK pathways activate stress kinases, which phosphorylate RXR and inhibit ligand-induced RXR-RAR activation (14) . Thus, several mechanisms could contribute to RA refractoriness in lung cancer.

In breast and ovarian cancer cells, the AIB-1 coactivator gene is amplified and overexpressed, and high AIB-1 levels contribute to hormonal dependence in these tumor types (25) . We examined the expression of coactivators and corepressors as a potential cause of RA refractoriness in lung cancer cells. We found no evidence that RA-refractory cells have reduced expression of a specific coactivator or overexpress a specific corepressor. These findings are consistent with previous reports that coactivators have partially overlapping functions (26) ; according to this hypothesis, reduced levels of a specific coactivator will not lead to loss of nuclear receptor function in cells that express multiple coactivator family members.

Cells use histones to compress DNA into chromatin, and the core histone proteins (two each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), along with the DNA that wraps around them, define the nucleosome. RA treatment leads to acetylation of histones H3 and H4, and histone acetylation is required for the transcription of retinoid receptor target genes (13) . In support of this hypothesis, we found that RA-induced histone H3 acetylation on the RARß promoter was disrupted in all RA-refractory lung cancer cells examined. Interestingly, among the cell lines with RARß promoter methylation, we observed aberrant H3 acetylation in 100% and aberrant H4 acetylation in only 17%, suggesting that DNA methylation selectively targets histone H3. Supporting this hypothesis, H3 is the histone specifically involved in methylation-induced silencing of proviral DNA and the imprinted genes Snrpn and U2af1-rs1 (27 , 28) . Histone H3 has a long NH2-terminal tail extending well outside the nucleosome that is subject to acetylation, phosphorylation, and methylation. Whether this characteristic or gene locus-specific factors predispose H3 to selective targeting by histone deacetylases is not known at this time.

In acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, which do not express RARß, the RARß promoter is methylated by the promyelocytic leukemia protein-RAR fusion protein, which recruits DNA methyltransferases to the RARß promoter (29) . In contrast to its effect in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, RA treatment in lung cancer cells did not restore RARß expression (Fig. 2)Citation or reverse RARß promoter methylation (data not shown), suggesting that the RARß promoter is methylated through distinct mechanisms in these two types of cancer cells.

Interestingly, we found histone H3 hypoacetylation in one cell line (H322) without evidence of RARß promoter methylation, indicating that mechanisms other than DNA methylation contribute to aberrant histone H3 acetylation in lung cancer cells. Recent data have shown that histone H3 hypoacetylation is linked mechanistically to methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (30) . This covalent modification leads to the organization of chromatin regions into higher-order structures (heterochromatin) that are transcriptionally silent (30) . Thus, the aberrant histone acetylation observed in certain lung cancer cells may be linked to other histone modifications that regulate chromatin structure and gene expression.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by R01 CA80686 and P50 CA70907 (Lung Cancer Specialized Programs of Research Excellence). Back

2 Y-A. S. and H-Y. L. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Box 432, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-6363; Fax: (713) 796-8655; E-mail: jkurie{at}mdanderson.org Back

4 The abbreviations used are: RA, retinoic acid; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; RARE, retinoic acid response element; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; 5-Aza-CdR, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR. Back

Received 4/ 5/02. Accepted 5/23/02.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mangelsdorf D. J., Umesono K., Evans R. M. The retinoid receptors Sporn M. B. Roberts A. B. Goodman D. S. eds. . Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine, : 319-348, Raven Press New York 1994.
  2. Tyler J. K., Kadonaga J. T. The "dark side" of chromatin remodeling: repressive effects on transcription. Cell, 99: 443-446, 1999.[Medline]
  3. Freedman L. P. Increasing the complexity of coactivation in nuclear receptor signaling. Cell, 97: 5-8, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Geradts J., Chen J. Y., Russell E. K., Yankaskas J. R., Nieves L., Minna J. D. Human lung cancer cell lines exhibit resistance to retinoic acid treatment. Cell Growth Differ., 4: 799-809, 1993.[Abstract]
  5. Xu X. C., Sozzi G., Lee J. S., Lee J. J., Pastorino U., Pilotti S., Kurie J. M., Hong W. K., Lotan R. Suppression of retinoic acid receptor ß in non-small-cell lung cancer in vivo: implications for lung cancer development. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 89: 624-629, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Moghal N., Neel B. G. Evidence for impaired retinoic acid receptor-thyroid hormone receptor AF-2 cofactor activity in human lung cancer. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3945-3959, 1995.[Abstract]
  7. Zhang X. K., Liu Y. L., Lee M. O., Pfahl M. A specific defect in the retinoic acid response associated with human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 54: 5663-5669, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Virmani A. K., Rathi A., Zochbauer-Muller S., Sacchi N., Fukuyama Y., Bryant D., Maitra A., Heda S., Fong K. M., Thunnissen F., Minna J. D., Gazdar A. F. Promoter methylation and silencing of the retinoic acid receptor-ß gene in lung carcinomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 92: 1303-1307, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rountree M. R., Bachman K. E., Herman J. G., Baylin S. B. DNA methylation, chromatin inheritance, and cancer. Oncogene, 20: 3156-3165, 2001.[Medline]
  10. Nan X., Ng H. H., Johnson C. A., Laherty C. D., Turner B. M., Eisenman R. N., Bird A. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature (Lond.), 393: 386-389, 1998.[Medline]
  11. Phelps R. M., Johnson B. E., Ihde D. C., Gazdar A. F., Linnoila R. I., Matthews M. J., Bunn P. A., Carney D., Minna J. D., Mulshine J. L. NCI-Navy Medical Oncology Branch cell line data base. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl., 24: 32-91, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Cote S., Sinnett D., Momparler R. L. Demethylation by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine of specific 5-methylcytosine sites in the promoter region of the retinoic acid receptor ß gene in human colon carcinoma cells. Anticancer Drugs, 9: 743-750, 1998.[Medline]
  13. Chen H., Lin R. J., Xie W., Wilpitz D., Evans R. Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell, 98: 675-686, 1999.[Medline]
  14. Lee H. Y., Suh Y. A., Robinson M. J., Clifford J. L., Hong W. K., Woodgett J. R., Cobbs M. H., Mangelsdorf D. J., Kurie J. M. Stress pathway activation induces phosphorylation of retinoid X receptor. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 32193-32199, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Li J., Wang J., Wang J., Nawaz Z., Liu J. M., Qin J., Wong J. Both corepressor proteins SMRT and N-CoR exist in large protein complexes containing HDAC3. EMBO J., 19: 4342-4350, 2000.[Medline]
  16. Hong H., Kohli K., Garabedian M. J., Stallcup M. R. GRIP1, a transcriptional coactivator for the AF-2 transactivation domain of steroid, thyroid, retinoid, and vitamin D receptors. Mol. Cell. Biol., 97: 2735-2744, 1997.
  17. Chiba H., Muramatsu M., Nomoto A., Kato H. Two human homologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SW12/SNF2 and Drosophila brahma are transcriptional coactivators cooperating with the estrogen receptor and the retinoic acid receptor. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 1815-1820, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sumi-Ichinose C., Ichinose H., Metzger D., Chambon P. SNF2ß-BRG1 is essential for the viability of F9 murine embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 5976-5986, 1997.[Abstract]
  19. vom Baur E., Harbers M., Um S. J., Benecke A., Chambon P., Losson R. The yeast Ada complex mediated the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of retinoid X and estrogen receptors. Genes Dev., 12: 1278-1289, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Horwitz K. B., Jackson T. A., Bain D. L., Richer J. K., Takimoto G. S., Tung L. Nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Mol. Endocrinol., 10: 1167-1177, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zhou Y., Gross W., Hong S. H., Privalsky M. L. The SMRT corepressor is a target of phosphorylation by protein kinase CK2 (casein kinase II). Mol. Cell. Biochem., 220: 1-13, 2001.[Medline]
  22. Zanger K., Radovick S., Wondisford F. E. CREB binding protein recruitment to the transcription complex requires growth factor-dependent phosphorylation of its GF box. Mol. Cell, 7: 551-558, 2001.[Medline]
  23. Wu Q., Li. Y., Liu R., Agadir A., Lee M. O., Liu Y., Zhang X. K. Modulation of retinoic acid sensitivity in lung cancer cells through dynamic balance of orphan receptors nur77 and COUP-TF and their heterodimerization. EMBOJ., 15: 1656-1669, 1997.
  24. Kamei Y., Xu L., Heinzel T., Torchia J., Kurokawa R., Gloss B., Lin S. C., Heyman R. A., Rose D. W., Glass C. K., Rosenfeld M. G. A CBP integrator complex mediated transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell, 85: 403-414, 1996.[Medline]
  25. Anzick S. L., Kononen J., Walker R. L., Azorsa D. O., Tanner M. M., Guan X. Y., Sauter G., Kallioniemi O. P., Trent J. M., Meltzer P. S. AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science (Wash. DC), 277: 965-968, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Xu J., Qiu Y., Demayo F. J., Tsai S. Y., Tsai M. J., O’Malley B. W. Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science (Wash. DC), 279: 1922-1925, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Gregory R. I., Randall T. E., Johnson C. A., Khosla S., Hatada I., O’Neil L. P., Turner B., M., Feil R. DNA methylation is linked to deacetylation of histone H3, but not H4 on the imprinted genes Snrpn and U2afl-rsl. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21: 5426-5436, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lorincz M. C., Schübeler D., Groudine M. Methylation-mediated proviral silencing is associated with MeCP2 recruitment and localized histone H3 deacetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21: 7913-7922, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Crose L. D., Raker V. A., Corsaro M., Fazi F., Fanelli M., Faretta M., Fuks F., Coco F. L., Kouzarides T., Nervi C., Minucci S., Pelicci P. G. Methyltransferase recruitment and DNA hypermethylation of target promoters by an oncogenic transcription factor. Science (Wash. DC), 295: 1079-1082, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rea S., Eisenhaber F., O’Carroll D., Strahl B. D., Sun Z-W., Schmid M., Pravil S., Mechtler K., Ponting C. P., Allis C. D., Jenuwein T. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-sepcific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature (Lond.), 406: 593-599, 2000.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
H. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Lee, X. Liang, X. Wu, T. Zhu, P.-k. Lo, X. Zhang, and S. Sukumar
HOXA5 Acts Directly Downstream of Retinoic Acid Receptor {beta} and Contributes to Retinoic Acid Induced Apoptosis and Growth Inhibition
Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8007 - 8013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Chakravarti, R. Lotan, A. H. Diwan, C. L. Warneke, M. M. Johnson, and V. G. Prieto
Decreased Expression of Retinoid Receptors in Melanoma: Entailment in Tumorigenesis and Prognosis
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4817 - 4824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Lefebvre, C. Brand, S. Flajollet, and P. Lefebvre
Down-Regulation of the Tumor Suppressor Gene Retinoic Acid Receptor {beta}2 through the Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 20(9): 2109 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. B. Cheung, J. Bell, A. Raif, A. Bohlken, J. Yan, B. Roediger, A. Poljak, S. Smith, M. Lee, W. D. Thomas, et al.
The Estrogen-responsive B Box Protein Is a Novel Regulator of the Retinoid Signal
J. Biol. Chem., June 30, 2006; 281(26): 18246 - 18256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. J. Petty, N. Li, A. Biddle, R. Bounds, C. Nitkin, Y. Ma, K. H. Dragnev, S. J. Freemantle, and E. Dmitrovsky
A Novel Retinoic Acid Receptor {beta} Isoform and Retinoid Resistance in Lung Carcinogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 16, 2005; 97(22): 1645 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
F. R. Hirsch and S. M. Lippman
Advances in the Biology of Lung Cancer Chemoprevention
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3186 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
N. P. Mongan and L. J. Gudas
Valproic acid, in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, restores expression of silenced RAR{beta}2 in breast cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2005; 4(3): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Srinivas, D. M. Juroske, S. Kalyankrishna, D. D. Cody, R. E. Price, X.-C. Xu, R. Narayanan, N. L. Weigel, and J. M. Kurie
c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Contributes to Aberrant Retinoid Signaling in Lung Cancer Cells by Phosphorylating and Inducing Proteasomal Degradation of Retinoic Acid Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(3): 1054 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
J. S. Kim, H. Lee, H. Kim, Y. M. Shim, J. Han, J. Park, and D.-H. Kim
Promoter Methylation of Retinoic Acid Receptor Beta 2 and the Development of Second Primary Lung Cancers in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3443 - 3450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurie, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurie, J. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online