Cancer Research TCM Europe  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, S. E.
[Cancer Research 62, 5351-5357, September 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

The Desmoplastic Response to Infiltrating Breast Carcinoma

Gene Expression at the Site of Primary Invasion and Implications for Comparisons between Tumor Types1

Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, Pedram Argani, Paula M. Hempen, Jessa Jones and Scott E. Kern2

Departments of Pathology [C. A. I-D., P. A.] and Oncology [P. M. H., J. J., S. E. K.], The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The gene expression patterns of desmoplasia are becoming exposed through the application of global gene expression technologies such as cDNA microarrays or serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). These patterns represent the sum of the many cellular components of the host stromal response to an infiltrating carcinoma. In studies of human neoplasms, it would be useful to identify those prototypical genes that characteristically indicate the recognizable forms of the responses to individual tumor types. Such genes may offer clues to better understand the process of invasion itself, the interactions between tumor and host cells, and tumor-specific differences in invasion. We used SAGE-defined genes and in situ transcript labeling to characterize the desmoplastic stroma induced by infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast. Principal component analysis identified 103 SAGE tags as specific for invasive breast carcinomas, in comparison with in situ duct carcinomas or normal breast epithelium. Of these, 68 tags corresponded to known genes. Six of the 68 genes from this breast cancer "invasion-specific" cluster were further characterized by in situ hybridization to breast cancer tissues. Results of in situ hybridization demonstrated that each gene was expressed within one of five distinct regions of the invasive tumors (neoplastic epithelium; angioendothelium; inflammatory, panstromal, and juxtatumoral stroma), reflecting a defined architectural structure to the transcriptome of invasive breast cancers. Two of these 6 genes were specifically expressed by the stromal cells within the invasive carcinoma; however, 1 (collagen 1{alpha}1) was expressed throughout the stromal response (panstromal expression), whereas the second (osteonectin) was specifically expressed within the juxtatumoral stromal cells, indicating a critical "regionality" of gene expression within the stromal response itself. A comparison of the gene expression profiles of the juxtatumoral stroma in breast and pancreatic carcinomas indicated important differences between the two, suggesting tumor-specific or organ-specific differences in the desmoplastic responses. Some of the genes presented are novel markers of the invasive process, imply communication at the host/tumor interface, and suggest potential therapeutic targets.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The ability of malignant neoplasms to invade adjacent normal tissues is fundamental to the neoplastic process. For many epithelial neoplasms, this process includes the ability to induce a desmoplastic response of the host tissues at the site of primary invasion. This host stromal response is a result of a complex interaction between the host and invading neoplasm, comprising fibroblasts, various inflammatory cells, proliferating vascular structures, as well as normal parenchymal cells undergoing atrophy at the invasive edge.

Recent investigations into the host desmoplastic response to infiltrating pancreatic adenocarcinoma have identified or refined an architectural organization of gene expression within this host response (1 , 2) . Ryu et al. (1) identified an invasion-specific cluster of genes when comparing SAGE3 libraries of primary carcinomas to those derived from passaged cancer cell lines. Many of the genes identified were found to be markers of the exuberant host stromal response present in infiltrating pancreatic cancers, representing distinct classes of genes with differing cellular functions. In situ hybridization, using 12 of these invasion-specific genes as probes, illustrated how gene expression patterns are partitioned into spatial compartments within the desmoplastic response to the tumor cells, including a distinct "juxtatumoral stroma," a region of the host response thought to be important for tumor-host interactions (2) . These genes, and their associated architectural compartments of gene expression, represent potential new targets for diagnostic screening or for therapeutic development.

We proposed that similar study of the desmoplastic response to an infiltrating carcinoma might be useful in understanding the molecular biology of other tumor types such as infiltrating duct carcinomas of the breast, which also characteristically can produce a prominent host stromal response (3) . We applied principal component analysis to a set of SAGE libraries generated from normal and neoplastic breast cancer tissues and cell lines and characterized those genes identified by in situ hybridization: (a) we determined whether the gene expression characteristic of the desmoplastic response to breast cancer is similar to that found in response to other epithelial neoplasms; (b) we examined whether spatially defined regions of gene expression exist among the desmoplastic responses to breast cancers, with specific attention to the juxtatumoral stroma; and (c) we sought to determine whether specific genes potentially important in the desmoplastic response to one tumor type may play a similar role in other epithelial neoplasms as well.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SAGE Data.
SAGE data of 11 breast-derived libraries were acquired from the CGAP database available in the NCBI SAGEmap database.4 The SAGE libraries of the two normal tissues, two ductal carcinomas in situ, and two invasive cancers and their matched lymph node metastases were prepared and sequenced as described in detail by Porter et al. (4) . Breast cancer cell line libraries LacZ, MCF70 h, and MDA453 were included in the analyses to aid in determination of invasion-specific gene expression. A total of 88,178 unique SAGE tags, which were identified among 467,742 total tags sequenced from 11 breast SAGE libraries, were used for all subsequent analyses.

Biocomputational Tools.
The Cluster and TreeView computer programs were obtained from the online resource5 and used for PCA and visualization of tree diagrams (5) . SAGE data were filtered as follows. Exclusion was applied to tags when fewer than two samples contained at least 5 tags in the raw data and when minimum and maximum values among all samples differed by <4 tags. This produced a dataset of 2,575 tags from an original 88,178 unique tags. The data were imported into the Cluster program and log-transformed, and PCA was performed. The names of genes and ESTs that matched the tag sequences were obtained using an online resource from NCBI.6

Tissues.
Paraffin-embedded tissues of four samples of infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast were obtained from the files of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. For each case, one representative section was chosen that contained invasive carcinoma and normal duct and lobule structures on the same slide. Three of the four cases also contained high-grade DCIS within the same paraffin section. All four carcinomas were Elston grade II/III (6) .

Nonradioactive in Situ Hybridization of Paraffin Sections.
To generate riboprobes for use in in situ hybridization of genes of interest, DNA templates were generated by PCR with incorporation of a T7 promoter into the antisense or sense primer (7) . After phenol:chloroform purification of amplified DNA, 200 ng of the DNA templates were used to generate either antisense or sense riboprobes by in vitro transcription with digoxigenin labeling reagents and T7 polymerase according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

In situ hybridization of paraffin-embedded tissues were performed following methods modified from Kadkol et al. (8) . Five-µ-thick sections were cut from the paraffin blocks, deparaffinized in xylene, and hydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol for 5 min each. Sections were incubated with 1% hydrogen peroxide, followed by digestion in 10 µg/ml of proteinase K at 37°C for 30 min. Sections were hybridized overnight at 15–25°C below the Tm calculated for each individual riboprobe with a 200 ng/ml dilution of either antisense or sense riboprobes in mRNA hybridization buffer (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). The following day, sections were washed in 2x SSC (0.3 M sodium chloride and 0.03 M sodium citrate) and incubated with a 1:35 dilution of RNase A cocktail (Ambion, Austin, TX) in 2x SSC for 37°C. Next, sections were stringently washed in 2x SSC/50% formamide twice, followed by one wash at 0.08x SSC at 5–8°C below the calculated Tm. For signal amplification, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-digoxigenin antibody (DAKO) was used to catalyze the deposition of biotinyl-tyramide, followed by secondary streptavidin complex (GenPoint kit; DAKO). The final signal was developed with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine chromagen (GenPoint kit; DAKO), and the tissue was counterstained in hematoxylin for 15 s.

Histological Evaluation of Tissue Sections.
In situ hybridization labeling of mRNA expression in samples of paraffin-embedded pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated by three of the authors (C. A. I-D., P. A., and S. E. K.) with agreement in all cases examined. For each case, the labeling pattern obtained following in situ hybridization was evaluated for the presence or absence of gene expression individually within the normal duct epithelium, duct carcinoma in situ (if present), and infiltrating duct carcinoma. Expression was also evaluated within the desmoplastic stroma of the neoplasm and the vasculature within the normal tissues and tumor mass. In those cases having positive expression noted within the tumor stroma, gene expression was scored as occurring within the entire stromal region of the tumor or in the stroma immediately adjacent to tumor epithelium (juxtatumoral stroma).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hierarchical Clustering.
One-way hierarchical clustering was used to examine the relationships among the 11 SAGE libraries samples based on their global gene expression profiles (Fig. 1)Citation . A dendrogram created by this analysis indicated that breast cancer tissues and their matched metastases were more similar to each other than to other breast cancer tissues or cell lines. Samples of normal breast epithelium also clustered together on a terminal branch of the dendrogram, and samples of DCIS (DCIS and DCIS2) were arranged between these two groups. The hierarchical clustering analysis also confirmed the expected dissimilarity of gene expression between the breast tissue libraries and breast cancer cell lines. Two of the three cancer cell lines clustered together on an independent arm of the dendrogram. However, one cell line, MCF70 h, clustered more closely to the tissue-derived breast samples than to the other cell lines analyzed. These findings are in agreement with similar reports (4 , 9) but also formed the basis for additional analyses to identify invasion-specific gene expression in breast cancers.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Relationships among samples shown by clustering of gene expression. LacZ, Mda453, and MCF70h are breast cancer cell lines; Normal 1 and Normal 2 are two samples of normal breast duct epithelium; DCIS and DCIS2 are samples of DCIS; Bt CA 1 and Bt Met 1, Bt CA2 and Bt Met 2 are two sets of matched infiltrating duct carcinoma and lymph node metastasis. Spearman rank correlation complete linkage clustering was used to produce tree diagrams.

 
Principal Component Analysis.
PCA can provide a global overview of the relatedness of gene expression profiles among samples while better avoiding the deterministic and rather arbitrary nature of hierarchical clustering. We therefore used PCA to delineate the gene cluster that distinguished the invasive breast cancer specimens from all others in this SAGE library dataset (Fig. 2)Citation . A cluster of genes specific for, and highly expressed in, invasive breast cancer tissues (primary carcinomas and matched metastases) was identified. This cluster thus identified the "invasion-specific genes" of breast carcinomas, as defined by comparison with breast cancer cell lines or samples of DCIS. This gene cluster is not to be confused with tumor-specific genes (present in both invasive breast cancer tissues and cell lines) but instead includes the gene expression associated with the presence of the host stromal response present within samples of infiltrating duct carcinoma. These genes may represent stromal gene expression or the expression of certain genes within the neoplastic epithelium as a function of tumor-stromal interactions (10 , 11) .



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Gene expression clustered by principal components analysis. Shown are all 2,575 SAGE tags obtained after filtering and broken down into the 11 principal components of clustered genes, which were labeled after visual interpretation. Brackets indicate the identification of the invasion-specific cluster and the normal epithelium cluster, which are expanded in size on the right for ease of viewing. The intra-SAGE study is reported with false colors, applied in a continuous scale according to the normalized tag counts, with discrete levels being illustrated in the color legend. Sample identities are aligned with respective columns using a visual guide at top left.

 
A smaller yet distinct cluster of genes was also identified to correspond to normal duct epithelium, similar to that described previously in a normal breast duct epithelium gene cluster (4) . Breast cancer cell lines and DCIS samples were less well delineated from the other samples and did not show distinct gene clusters by PCA. However, because our goal was to investigate the host response to breast cancer, we directed our attention solely to the invasion-specific gene cluster.

Genes Characteristic of Invasive Breast Cancer.
Table 1Citation contains the identities of the SAGE tags and their frequency of appearance in the invasion-specific gene cluster of breast duct carcinoma. Among 103 tags, 68 matched to known transcripts, and 35 might include novel genes. A comparison of the genes identified in our invasion-specific cluster to that of Porter et al. (4) revealed several similarities, with 15 of the genes identified in their analysis also being identified by our methods (Table 1)Citation . However, several genes were identified in our cluster that were not reported (e.g., thymosin ß4, apolipoprotein E, laminin receptor 1, and IGFBP7), suggesting the contrasting of primary tumors to breast cancer cell lines and analysis by PCA may be more appropriate for the identification of invasion-specific gene expression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Breast cancer invasion-specific cluster: Genes and frequencies among breast tissue librariesa

 
Infiltrating carcinomas are often associated with a dense fibrous host stromal reaction to the neoplasm, known as desmoplasia. At the advancing edge of the infiltrating carcinoma, there is often entrapment of normal duct and lobule structures, as well as foci of residual duct carcinoma in situ present within the original site of neoplastic formation. Inflammatory cells may also represent a proportion of the cellularity of the mass and are usually found at the advancing edges of the neoplasm as it invades through normal structures. The genes identified within this invasion-specific cluster are therefore best categorized with an understanding of the variety of cell types that constitute the primary site of invasion within breast carcinomas.

Genes identified within this cluster reflected the presence of various components of the host stromal response, including extracellular matrix remodeling (e.g., collagen 1{alpha}1; Ref. 12 ), angiogenesis (e.g., IGFBP7 and osteonectin; Ref. 13 ), the immune response (e.g., immunoglobulin heavy chain {gamma}3; Refs. 9 , 14 ), increased proliferation (cdk inhibitor 3 and SMC4-like 1; Refs. 9 , 14 ), or elevated transciptional demands (ribosomal proteins; Ref. 15 ). Relatively few genes identified within this breast invasion-specific gene cluster, however, were also present within the invasion-specific gene cluster characteristic of pancreatic cancer (1) . Genes that were found in both invasion-specific gene clusters included apolipoprotein C-1, osteonectin, and collagen 1{alpha}1, suggesting that some genes may play a universal role in the host stromal response to infiltrating cancer. However, most genes identified in the breast invasion-specific gene cluster were not identified in the invasion-specific cluster of the pancreas, and vice versa. It was thus possible that invasion-specific gene expression might relate to the primary organ in which the host stromal response occurs. Alternatively, because the identification of invasion-specific genes by PCA predominantly reflects quantitative changes in expression, the differences in desmoplastic gene expression between these two tumor types might primarily reflect the relatively more exuberant host stromal response to pancreas cancer, with a more cellular host response perhaps being represented in SAGE libraries from those tumors. These possibilities were addressed by in situ studies.

In situ Hybridization of Selected Invasion-specific Genes.
Because invasive breast carcinomas represent an aggregate of diverse cell types, the precise cellular origin of these transcripts cannot be determined without additional study. To define the cellular origin and patterns of expression of these genes associated with the host stromal response to breast cancer, 6 genes were selected for further study of their expression in invasive breast carcinoma tissues by in situ hybridization (Fig. 3)Citation . These gene expression markers were selected for their presumed role in the host stromal response, such as new vessel formation (IGFBP7 and osteonectin; Ref. 13 ), fibroblastic proliferation (collagen 1{alpha}1 and apoliproprotein C-1; Ref. 1 ), extracellular matrix remodeling (collagen 1{alpha}1 and laminin receptor 1; Refs. 1 , 16 ), or the inflammatory response (fusin; Ref. 17 ).



View larger version (193K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. In situ detection of invasive tissue-specific genes in breast cancer. Invasive tissue-specific gene expression was found to be located within angioendothelial tissue (A), tumor epithelium (B), juxtatumoral stroma (C), panstromal tissue (D), or inflammatory cells within the invasive carcinoma (E and F). A, IGFBP7 mRNA expression detected within angioendothelium. Adjacent tumor epithelium and stroma are negative in expression in this field. B, laminin receptor 1 mRNA expression detected within tumor epithelium but not within adjacent stroma. C, osteonectin mRNA expression detected within stromal cells immediately adjacent to tumor epithelium (juxtatumoral stroma) but not in stromal cells away from the invasive tumor glands. Osteonectin mRNA expression was also seen in endothelial cells (not shown). D, collagen 1{alpha}1 mRNA expression detected throughout the stromal response. Tumor epithelium is negative. E, apolipoprotein C-1 mRNA expression detected within macrophages scattered throughout the stroma, as well as within areas of comedonecrosis (bottom right and inset). F, fusin mRNA expression detected within mature lymphocytes at the infiltrating edges of the tumor. Tumor epithelium, angioendothelium, and stroma were all negative.

 
In situ hybridization was performed for each of the 6 invasion-specific genes on four paraffin-embedded tissue samples obtained from mastectomy specimens removed for infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. Detectable expression of all 6 genes was observed in all four neoplasms. For each gene, detectable expression was found to localize to one or more of five distinct architectural regions, or "gene expression compartments," of the invasive tumors: (a) neoplastic epithelium; (b) angioendothelium and/or vascular smooth muscle; (c) juxtatumoral stroma (i.e., only those stromal cells immediately adjacent to the invasive neoplastic epithelium); (d) panstromal tissue (i.e., all areas of stromal tissue of the invasive tumor); or (e) inflammatory cells within the invasive focus.

Four of the 6 genes were expressed within a single architectural compartment in the four samples of invasive cancer (Fig. 3)Citation . Expression of laminin receptor 1 was localized to neoplastic epithelium, with no additional expression noted in the surrounding stromal or angioendothelial compartments. In contrast, collagen 1{alpha}1 gene expression was observed throughout the stromal response (panstromal), whereas the neoplastic epithelial and angioendothelial compartments were negative for expression of this gene. Finally, the gene expression of fusin and apolipoprotein C-1 was observed within leukocytic (inflammatory) cells infiltrating within the invasive carcinomas. Fusin gene expression was predominantly within small lymphocytes, whereas apolipoprotein C-1 gene expression was within macrophages infiltrating the tumor or within necrotic debris associated with DCIS. Osteonectin and IGFBP7 were expressed within two architectural compartments in all four carcinomas studied. Osteonectin gene expression was observed within angioendothelial cells and the juxtatumoral stroma in all four cases. IGFBP7 was predominantly expressed within the angioendothelium, although two of four cases also showed weak labeling of tumor epithelium. Thus, although the identification of IGFBP7 within the invasion-specific cluster of breast cancer can largely be attributed to endothelial expression, our results are fully consistent with the published reports of IGFBP7 gene expression within breast tumor epithelium (18 , 19) . Three genes (osteonectin, collagen 1{alpha}1, and IGFBP7) were specifically expressed within the invasive tumor as compared with adjacent normal breast tissue and serve as markers of the desmoplastic response in infiltrating breast carcinomas (20 , 21) . Osteonectin is a phosphorylated, acidic, glycine-rich glycoprotein of Mr 43,000 with multiple Ca2+-binding domains. The function of osteonectin is not primarily known, but it is thought to be involved in angiogenesis and remodeling of the extracellular matrix in keeping with its elevated expression in the host stromal response (22 , 23) . Collagen 1{alpha}1 expression by the stroma likely reflects the transcriptional activity of proliferating fibroblastic tissue within the host response. IGFBP7, which was strongly expressed by endothelial cells, has not been described as an endothelial-specific marker in human tumors, although other members of this gene family have been so implicated (13) . For each invasive carcinoma analyzed, samples of normal breast terminal duct lobular unit epithelium were present within the same tissue section. Expression of three genes, fusin, apolipoprotein C-1, and laminin receptor 1, were also noted in tissues of the normal breast. Fusin expression was noted within small lymphocytes within the intralobular stroma of normal lobules, and apolipoprotein C-1 was expressed in macrophages present in benign ducts. Laminin receptor 1, although most strongly expressed by the neoplastic epithelium, was also weakly expressed in atrophic ducts, as well as in areas of DCIS both within and outside the mass.

Invasion-specific genes were thus spatially localized to distinct compartments of gene expression in the host stromal response to breast cancer. This extends our prior observations in the pancreas and supports the existence of a highly structured organization of gene expression within the host desmoplastic response to infiltrating carcinoma. Specifically, the finding of osteonectin gene expression localized to the juxtatumoral stroma validates this newly defined architectural region of the host stromal transcriptional response. Expression of osteonectin by the juxtatumoral stroma may thus be intimately involved with the invasive process and highlights this region as a potential site of tumor-host interactions to be targeted for therapeutic intervention.

Comparison of Juxtatumoral Gene Expression in Breast and Pancreas Carcinomas.
We have noted previously that apolipoprotein C-1, apolipoprotein D, and MMP11 are each gene expression markers of the juxtatumoral stromal compartment in adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (2) . In an effort to better discern the gene expression patterns of this distinct region of the host stromal response, we performed in situ hybridization of each of these 3 genes in the four samples of invasive breast carcinoma, with comparison to the gene expression patterns seen previously in samples of paraffin-embedded pancreas cancers for these genes (Fig. 4)Citation .



View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison of juxtatumoral gene expression in invasive breast and pancreas cancers. In situ detection of apolipoprotein C-1 (A and B), apolipoprotein D (C and D), and MMP11 (E and F) in paraffin-embedded sections of breast and pancreas cancers (x100). A, C, and E are sections of infiltrating breast cancer, and B, D, and F are sections of infiltrating pancreas cancer. Apolipoprotein C-1 (ApoC) localizes to macrophages within areas of tissue invasion and necrosis in breast cancer specimens (A), in contrast to the juxtatumoral stromal expression seen for apolipoprotein C in pancreas cancers (B). Apolipoprotein D (ApoD) expression localizes to tumor epithelium of breast cancers (C), also in contrast to the juxtatumoral stroma expression seen for apolipoprotein D in pancreas cancers (D). Only MMP11 gene expression localizes to the juxtatumoral stroma of invasive breast (E) and pancreas (F) cancers.

 
Gene expression of the juxtatumoral stroma was found to differ among these two tumor types. As noted previously, apolipoprotein C-1 was one of only 3 genes common to the invasion-specific clusters of both the breast and pancreas. Surprisingly, although this gene was expressed in both tumor types, its cellular distribution within breast or pancreas cancers was dissimilar. Apolipoprotein C-1 gene expression localized to tumor-infiltrating macrophages in the four samples of breast carcinoma (Fig. 4A)Citation but was clearly expressed by stromal fibroblasts within the juxtatumoral stroma in the four samples of pancreatic carcinoma (Fig. 4B)Citation . Apolipoprotein D expression also differed among breast and pancreas cancers. Apolipoprotein D gene expression was localized to tumor epithelium in the four breast carcinomas (Fig. 4C)Citation , in contrast to the juxtatumoral stromal pattern seen in all four pancreas cancer tumor tissues (Fig. 4D)Citation . Only MMP11, of the 3 invasion-specific genes studied, was found to localize to the juxtatumoral stroma in all four breast cancers and in all four pancreatic cancers studied (Fig. 4, E and F)Citation . Thus, although the juxtatumoral stroma appears to be a defined component of the host stromal response, the gene expression profile of this compartment must depend in part upon the site of tumor origin.

Surprisingly, although these genes are associated with the process of tissue invasion in both breast and pancreas cancers, their role in tissue invasion differs between these two tumor types. These observations in turn raise several other questions regarding the desmoplastic response to human tumors, i.e., is the gene expression of the host stromal response to primary tumors similar to or different from the stromal response present in metastatic tumors? Do histologically different tumors that are derived from the same organ type produce similar or different host stromal responses? Our current data indicate that, with respect to the desmoplastic response, the robust patterns of gene expression in one tumor type are different from the robust patterns seen in other tumor types. Clearly, additional work needs to be done to determine how static or variable these gene expression patterns are.

In summary, the patterns of spatially organized compartments of gene expression in the host response to breast cancer and the comparisons among various cancer types provide new insights into the biology of desmoplasia. These similarities in the host stromal response to different tumor types may suggest some universal targets for therapeutic intervention. Additional studies to understand the desmoplastic response to invasive neoplasms may aid in identifying new targets for clinical imaging, serological diagnosis, drug development, and delivery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1A Continued

 

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Sandra Rempel for the generous gift of the osteonectin cDNA used for preparation of the osteonectin-specific riboprobes for in situ hybridization.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by the NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence in Gastrointestinal Cancer Grant CA 62924 (to S. E. K.) and the NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence in Breast Cancer Grant CA88843. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Oncology, Room 461, Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans Street, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231. Phone: (410) 614-3316; Fax: (410) 614-9705; E-mail: sk{at}jhmi.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: SAGE, serial analysis of gene expression; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; PCA, principal component analysis; EST, expressed sequence tag; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor binding protein. Back

4 Internet address: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SAGE/. Back

5 Internet address: http://www.microarrays.org/software.html. Back

6 Internet address: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SAGE/SAGEtag.cgi. Back

Received 4/17/02. Accepted 7/19/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ryu B., Jones J., Hollingsworth M. A., Hruban R. H., Kern S. E. Invasion-specific genes in malignancy: serial analysis of gene expression comparisons of primary and passaged cancers. Cancer Res., 61: 1833-1838, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Iacobuzio-Donahue C. A., Ryu B., Hruban R. H., Kern S. E. Exploring the host desmoplastic response to pancreatic carcinoma: gene expression of stromal and neoplastic cells at the site of primary invasion. Am. J. Pathol., 160: 91-99, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Walker R. A. The complexities of breast cancer desmoplasia. Breast Cancer Res., 3: 143-145, 2001.[Medline]
  4. Porter D. A., Krop I. E., Nasser S., Sgroi D., Kaelin C. M., Marks J. R., Riggins G., Polyak K. A SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression) view of breast tumor progression. Cancer Res., 61: 5697-5702, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Eisen M. B., Spellman P. T., Brown P. O., Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 14863-14868, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Elston C. W., Ellis I. O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991.[Medline]
  7. Baklanov M. M., Golikova L. N., Malygin E. G. Effect on DNA transcription of nucleotide sequences upstream to T7 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res, 24: 3659-3660, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kadkol S. S., Gage W. R., Pasternack G. R. In situ hybridization-theory and practice. Mol. Diagn., 4: 169-183, 1999.[Medline]
  9. Perou C. M., Sorlie T., Eisen M. B., Van de Rijn M., Jeffrey S. S., Rees C. A., Pollack J. R., Ross D. T., Johnsen H., Akslen L. A., Fluge O., Pergamenschikov A., Williams C., Zhu S. X., Lonning P. E., Borresen-Dale A. L., Brown P. O., Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature (Lond.), 406: 747-752, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Tlsty T. D. Stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals. Semin. Cancer Biol., 11: 97-104, 2001.[Medline]
  11. Tlsty T. D., Hein P. W. Know thy neighbor: stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 11: 54-59, 2001.[Medline]
  12. Gress T. M., Muller-Pillasch F., Lerch M. M., Friess H., Buchler M., Beger H. G., Adler G. Balance of expression of genes coding for extracellular matrix proteins and extracellular matrix degrading proteases in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology, 32: 221-225, 1994.
  13. St Croix B., Rago C., Velculescu V., Traverso G., Romans K. E., Montgomery E., Lal A., Riggins G. J., Lengauer C., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K. W. Genes expressed in human tumor endothelium. Science (Wash. DC), 289: 1197-1202, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Perou C. M., Jeffrey S. S., van de R. M., Rees C. A., Eisen M. B., Ross D. T., Pergamenschikov A., Williams C. F., Zhu S. X., Lee J. C., Lashkari D., Shalon D., Brown P. O., Botstein D. Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 9212-9217, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Iyer V. R., Eisen M. B., Ross D. T., Schuler G., Moore T., Lee J. C., Trent J. M., Staudt L. M., Hudson J., Jr., Boguski M. S., Lashkari D., Shalon D., Botstein D., Brown P. O. The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science (Wash. DC), 283: 83-87, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kikkawa Y., Sanzen N., Fujiwara H., Sonnenberg A., Sekiguchi K. Integrin binding specificity of laminin-10/11: laminin-10/11 are recognized by {alpha}3ß1, {alpha}6ß1 and {alpha}6ß4 integrins. J. Cell Sci., 113 (Pt. 5): 869-876, 2000.[Abstract]
  17. Egawa T., Kawabata K., Kawamoto H., Amada K., Okamoto R., Fujii N., Kishimoto T., Katsura Y., Nagasawa T. The earliest stages of B cell development require a chemokine stromal cell-derived factor/pre-B cell growth-stimulating factor. Immunity, 15: 323-334, 2001.[Medline]
  18. Degeorges A., Wang F., Frierson H. F., Jr., Seth A., Sikes R. A. Distribution of IGFBP-rP1 in normal human tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 48: 747-754, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Landberg G., Ostlund H., Nielsen N. H., Roos G., Emdin S., Burger A. M., Seth A. Downregulation of the potential suppressor gene IGFBP-rP1 in human breast cancer is associated with inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein, cyclin E overexpression and increased proliferation in estrogen receptor negative tumors. Oncogene, 20: 3497-3505, 2001.[Medline]
  20. Gilles C., Bassuk J. A., Pulyaeva H., Sage E. H., Foidart J. M., Thompson E. W. SPARC/osteonectin induces matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 58: 5529-5536, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bellahcene A., Castronovo V. Increased expression of osteonectin and osteopontin, two bone matrix proteins, in human breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 146: 95-100, 1995.[Abstract]
  22. Bradshaw A. D., Reed M. J., Sage E. H. SPARC-null mice exhibit accelerated cutaneous wound closure. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 50: 1-10, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kato Y., Lewalle J. M., Baba Y., Tsukuda M., Sakai N., Baba M., Kobayashi K., Koshika S., Nagashima Y., Frankenne F., Noel A., Foidart J. M., Hata R. I. Induction of SPARC by VEGF in human vascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 287: 422-426, 2001.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Z.-S. Zhao, Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-Q. Chu, Z.-Y. Ye, and H.-Q. Tao
SPARC Is Associated with Gastric Cancer Progression and Poor Survival of Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2010; 16(1): 260 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Oku, T. Shimoji, K. Takifuji, T. Hotta, S. Yokoyama, K. Matsuda, T. Higashiguchi, T. Tominaga, T. Nasu, K. Tamura, et al.
Identification of the Molecular Mechanisms for Dedifferentiation at the Invasion Front of Colorectal Cancer by a Gene Expression Analysis
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7215 - 7222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Qu, S. Van Ginkel, A. M. Roy, L. Westbrook, M. Nasrin, Y. Maxuitenko, A. R. Frost, D. Carey, W. Wang, R. Li, et al.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Reduces Tamoxifen Efficacy and Promotes Metastatic Colonization and Desmoplasia in Breast Tumors
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6232 - 6240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. B. Prasad, H. Somervell, R. P. Tufano, A. P.B. Dackiw, M. R. Marohn, J. A. Califano, Y. Wang, W. H. Westra, D. P. Clark, C. B. Umbricht, et al.
Identification of Genes Differentially Expressed in Benign versus Malignant Thyroid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3327 - 3337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. M. Halbleib, A. M. Saaf, P. O. Brown, and W. J. Nelson
Transcriptional Modulation of Genes Encoding Structural Characteristics of Differentiating Enterocytes During Development of a Polarized Epithelium In Vitro
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2007; 18(11): 4261 - 4278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Gronborg, T. Z. Kristiansen, A. Iwahori, R. Chang, R. Reddy, N. Sato, H. Molina, O. N. Jensen, R. H. Hruban, M. G. Goggins, et al.
Biomarker Discovery from Pancreatic Cancer Secretome Using a Differential Proteomic Approach
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2006; 5(1): 157 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Ikuta, T. Nakatsura, T. Kageshita, S. Fukushima, S. Ito, K. Wakamatsu, H. Baba, and Y. Nishimura
Highly Sensitive Detection of Melanoma at an Early Stage Based on the Increased Serum Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine and Glypican-3 Levels
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 11(22): 8079 - 8088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Koblinski, B. R. Kaplan-Singer, S. J. VanOsdol, M. Wu, J. A. Engbring, S. Wang, C. M. Goldsmith, J. T. Piper, J. G. Vostal, J. F. Harms, et al.
Endogenous Osteonectin/SPARC/BM-40 Expression Inhibits MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Metastasis
Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7370 - 7377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. P.H.M. Jansen, J. A. Foekens, I. L. van Staveren, M. M. Dirkzwager-Kiel, K. Ritstier, M. P. Look, M. E. Meijer-van Gelder, A. M. Sieuwerts, H. Portengen, L. C.J. Dorssers, et al.
Molecular Classification of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Carcinomas by Gene Expression Profiling
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Zucchi, E. Mento, V. A. Kuznetsov, M. Scotti, V. Valsecchi, B. Simionati, E. Vicinanza, G. Valle, S. Pilotti, R. Reinbold, et al.
Gene expression profiles of epithelial cells microscopically isolated from a breast-invasive ductal carcinoma and a nodal metastasis
PNAS, December 28, 2004; 101(52): 18147 - 18152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. S. Parker, P. Argani, B. P. Cook, H. Liangfeng, S. D. Chartrand, M. Zhang, S. Saha, A. Bardelli, Y. Jiang, T. B. St. Martin, et al.
Alterations in Vascular Gene Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7857 - 7866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Oue, Y. Hamai, Y. Mitani, S. Matsumura, Y. Oshimo, P. P. Aung, K. Kuraoka, H. Nakayama, and W. Yasui
Gene Expression Profile of Gastric Carcinoma: Identification of Genes and Tags Potentially Involved in Invasion, Metastasis, and Carcinogenesis by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression
Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2397 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
P. A. Puolakkainen, R. A. Brekken, S. Muneer, and E. H. Sage
Enhanced Growth of Pancreatic Tumors in SPARC-Null Mice Is Associated With Decreased Deposition of Extracellular Matrix and Reduced Tumor Cell Apoptosis
Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 2(4): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Maeda, C. M. Alexander, and A. Friedl
Induction of Syndecan-1 Expression in Stromal Fibroblasts Promotes Proliferation of Human Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 612 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, R. Ashfaq, A. Maitra, N. V. Adsay, G. L. Shen-Ong, K. Berg, M. A. Hollingsworth, J. L. Cameron, C. J. Yeo, S. E. Kern, et al.
Highly Expressed Genes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas: A Comprehensive Characterization and Comparison of the Transcription Profiles Obtained from Three Major Technologies
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8614 - 8622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Walter-Yohrling, X. Cao, M. Callahan, W. Weber, S. Morgenbesser, S. L. Madden, C. Wang, and B. A. Teicher
Identification of Genes Expressed in Malignant Cells That Promote Invasion
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8939 - 8947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. I. Koukourakis, A. Giatromanolaki, R. A. Brekken, E. Sivridis, K. C. Gatter, A. L. Harris, and E. H. Sage
Enhanced Expression of SPARC/Osteonectin in the Tumor-associated Stroma of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Is Correlated with Markers of Hypoxia/ Acidity and with Poor Prognosis of Patients
Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 63(17): 5376 - 5380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Chen, R. B. Halberg, W. M. Ehrhardt, J. Torrealba, and W. F. Dove
Clusterin as a biomarker in murine and human intestinal neoplasia
PNAS, August 5, 2003; 100(16): 9530 - 9535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Lin, M. T. Vahey, D. Thach, D. A. Stenger, and J. J. Pancrazio
Biological Threat Detection via Host Gene Expression Profiling
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2003; 49(7): 1045 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. D. Cheng and L. M. Weiner
Tumors and Their Microenvironments: Tilling the Soil: Commentary re: A. M. Scott et al., A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Sibrotuzumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Fibroblast Activation Protein-positive Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 9: 1639-1647, 2003.
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 1590 - 1595.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, S. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online