Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, R. G.
[Cancer Research 62, 450-458, January 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors Reverse Ras-mediated Inhibition of Fas Gene Expression

Bin Zhang, George C. Prendergast and Robert G. Fenton1

Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [B. Z., R. G. F.], and Glenolden Laboratory, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Co., Glenolden, Pennsylvania 19036 [G. C. P.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Factors that govern host-tumor interaction play a critical role in tumor progression. In previous studies we have shown that oncogenic Ras inhibits the expression of Fas (CD95) and renders Ras-transformed cells resistant to Fas-induced death. We now demonstrate that culture of Ras-transformed cells in the presence of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) LB42722 leads to up-regulation of Fas expression, both under basal growth conditions and in the presence of the inflammatory cytokines IFN-{gamma} and tumor necrosis factor {alpha}. This is manifested by an increase in fas mRNA, Fas cell surface expression, and Fas-induced apoptosis. Whereas FTI up-regulates expression of FAS in Ras-transformed cells, it inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Culture of Ras-transformed cells in the presence of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A resulted in morphological reversion and G1 arrest (as observed with FTI); however, no induction of Fas was observed. Furthermore, the effects of FTI on Fas-induced death were shown to be independent of RhoB. Therefore, inhibition of oncogenic Ras by FTI can result in two events that alter host-tumor interactions: up-regulation of Fas, rendering tumors more sensitive to immune cytotoxic effector cells, and down-reglation of VEGF, which may inhibit tumor angiogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cancer cells arise as the result of a multistep accumulation of genetic lesions that leads to the gain or loss of function of key regulatory proteins within the cell. Aberrant cell proliferation is often incurred by deregulation of growth-promoting oncogenes such as Myc and Ras (1 , 2) , and the loss of G1 restriction point control through lesions in the Rb/p16Ink4a pathway (3) . A second class of genetic lesions prevents apoptosis of the evolving tumor cells in response to aberrant oncogene activation, loss of substratum attachment, chromosomal instability, DNA damage, hypoxia, and a limiting supply of growth factors. These often involve genes encoding p53 (4) , pro-survival Bcl-2 family members (5) , and others. As tumors grow within the host, other properties of the malignant phenotype become relevant. These include the regulation of tumor cell invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and evasion of the host immune system (6 , 7) . Thus, the mechanisms by which oncogenes promote host-tumor interactions favorable to the growing tumor, which can be critical to the ultimate progression of cancer within the patient, are of great importance.

Cellular transformation by the ras oncogene involves activation of signal transduction pathways that promote deregulated cell cycle progression and enhance cell survival (8) . Oncogenic Ras induces constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, culminating in activation of the ERK12 and ERK2 serine/threonine kinases (9) . ERK targets include other cytoplasmic kinases, such a p90Rsk (10) , and nuclear transcription factors such as members of the serum response factor family (11) . Activated Ras promotes cell cycle progression by cooperation with other proto-oncogenes such as Myc, leading to increases in cyclin D1 levels and Cdk2/cyclin E activity, and inhibition of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 (12 , 13) . Another direct target of Ras is PI3K, the activation of which results in increases in plasma membrane 3,4- and 3,4,5-phosphatydylinositol triphosphate, which provide docking sites for pleckstrin homology domain-containing proteins, including the ser/thr kinase Akt (14) . Akt promotes cell survival by regulating a number of apoptotic pathways (15, 16, 17, 18, 19) . Other cellular pathways are required for Ras transformation, including those regulated by the Ras-related small GTPase proteins of the Rho family (20) .

In addition to regulating genes involved in cell autonomous processes such as proliferation and cell survival, the ras oncogene product regulates the expression of genes that play important roles in regulating host-tumor interactions, such as those encoding VEGF and matrix metalloproteinases (21 , 22) . Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that oncogenic Ras inhibits the expression of the Fas (CD95) death receptor, thus rendering cells resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis (23) . Oncogenic Ras also inhibited the up-regulation of Fas by the inflammatory cytokines TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}. Inhibition of Fas-induced death by oncogenic Ras was attributable to inhibition of fas expression from the endogenous fas promoter, because the Ras-induced block could be overcome by ectopic expression of Fas via retroviral transduction (23) . These observations were subsequently confirmed by others (24) .

Fas is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that contains a cytoplasmic death domain homologous to that encoded by members of the TNF receptor supergene family (25) . Trimerization of the Fas receptor by Fas ligand expressed on T or natural killer cells, by soluble Fas ligand, or anti-Fas antibodies, results in the formation of a membrane-proximal signaling complex associated with the Fas death domain. Recruited to this complex through death domain interactions is the adaptor protein FADD/MORT1 (26 , 27) , the death effector domain of which subsequently associates with caspase 8 (28 , 29) . Caspase 8 is activated through autocleavage of the clustered proenzyme, and the caspase cascade is activated, resulting in cell death. The ability of tumor cells to down-regulate death receptor expression could enhance their chances of evading host immunosurveillance mechanisms.

An important goal of cancer therapeutics is to target specifically the genetic lesions responsible for the malignant phenotype (30) . One of the first cases of oncogene-targeted therapy is the development of FTIs that prevent the function of Ras proteins by blocking post-translational attachment of prenyl-moieties to the COOH terminus of Ras, thereby inhibiting membrane localization and function (31 , 32) . This concept has been validated by in vitro studies demonstrating relative specificity for transformed cells (33) , and by studies demonstrating the ability of FTI to regress spontaneously arising tumors in oncogene-transgenic mice (34) . Recently, however, studies have raised questions as to whether Ras is the real target responsible for the antitumor activity of FTI, or whether other farnesylated proteins (such as RhoB, nuclear lamins, or the chaperone protein HDS-2) may be the true intracellular targets that mediate growth inhibition (35, 36, 37) . In addition, few studies have examined how FTI treatment may change key regulators of the host-tumor interaction. Because FTIs have entered into Phase I clinical studies, understanding the mechanisms by which these drugs function is of great importance (36 , 38) . Therefore, we have tested the effects of FTI in our system in which oncogenic Ras blocks the expression of Fas. We find that treating Ras-transformed cells with FTI results in reversal of the inhibition of fas gene expression and renders FTI-treated cancer cells susceptible to Fas-induced apoptosis. These data have implications for host-tumor interactions in patients treated with FTI.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines.
C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The C3HpBpuro and C3HpBRas cell lines were derived by infection of C3H10T1/2 with retroviruses encoding the empty pBabe-puro vector or the pBabe-Ras vector, respectively. Each cell line represents a pool of hundreds of independent infection events. The pBabe-Ras vector encodes a human H-rasV12 cDNA (a gift from Dr. Scott Lowe, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY). Retroviruses were generated by transient transfection of the Bosc 23 ecotropic packaging line as described previously (23) . The 61LpBpuro clone was derived by infection of the Ras-transformed cell line C3H61L (which encodes H-ras with a 61 leucine mutation) with ecotropic retrovirus encoding pBabe-puro. Similarly, infection of C3H61L with ecotropic virus encoding a murine fas cDNA (pBabe-mFas) yielded the clonal cell line 61LpBFas27. This Ras-transformed cell line encodes murine Fas from the viral LTR, with levels of Fas expression being independent of oncogenic Ras or the presence of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} in culture media. Cells were grown in DMEM containing 5% FCS. For some experiments, cells were grown overnight in medium containing 100 units/ml murine IFN-{gamma} (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) and/or murine TNF-{alpha} (PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ). The addition of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} to the cultures had no adverse effects on the growth or survival of any of the cell lines used in this study. Trichostatin A (Wako Chemicals, Inc., Richmond, VA) was stored as a 1.5 mM stock in DMSO, and was used at 150 nM.

FTI LB42722 and GGTI 286.
The farnesyltransferase inhibitor LB42722, referred to subsequently as FTI, was kindly provided by LG Chemical Ltd. (Taejon, Korea). LB42722 has the following biochemical properties: the IC50 for H-ras farnesylation is 1.2 nM; the IC50 for Rat2/H-ras soft agar colony formation is 5.0 nM; and the IC50 for GGTase I is > 100 µM. A stock solution containing 10 mM FTI was prepared in DMSO and stored at -20°C. FTI was added to cell cultures at a final concentration of 1 µM. This dose of FTI resulted in a >75% inhibition of H-Ras processing (see Fig. 5Citation ). GGTI 286 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was used at a final concentration of 10 µM and stored as a 10 mM stock in DMSO.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of FTI on the levels of GTP-bound Ras. Cells were grown for 48 h in the presence or absence of FTI, and protein extracts were prepared. The levels of Ras-GTP were determined by the ability of Ras-GTP to bind to a specific protein domain of Raf in the form of a GST-fusion protein (see "Materials and Methods"). Lane 1, C3HpBpuro cells from preconfluent cultures grown under normal growth conditions (no FTI) demonstrate undetectable levels of Ras-GTP (identical results were obtained in the presence of FTI, not shown). Lane 2, C3HpBRas cells grown in the absence of FTI. Lane 3, C3HpBRas cells grown in the presence of FTI. Lane 4, the Ras-transformed clone 61LpBpuro grown in the absence of FTI. Lane 5, 61LpBpuro grown in the presence of FTI. The arrow indicates a faint band migrating slightly slower than fully processed Ras. Arrowheads indicate more rapidly migrating bands that react with anti-Ras MoAb, and are presumed to be Ras degradation products. Densitometric analysis demonstrated a 3.5-fold decrease in the level of fully processed Ras in Lane 3 compared with Lane 2, and a 5-fold drop on Lane 5 compared with Lane 4.

 
Plasmids and Transfections.
C3HpBRas cells were transfected using the LipofectAMINE Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), as recommended by the manufacturer. RhoB expression plasmids were cotransfected with pEGFP-C1 at a 4:1 ratio. The cDNAs encoding HA-tagged RhoB-V14 and RhoB-G were cloned into pcDNA3. RhoB-GG has the 16 COOH-terminal amino acids from RhoB replaced with 13 COOH-terminal amino acids from RhoA that are preferentially recognized by GGT-I (39) . The RhoB-Dead cDNA encodes an HA-tagged form of RhoB that diverges from wild-type RhoB at the COOH terminus: the 16 COOH-terminal amino acids of RhoB are replaced by the sequence ISITLAAARACI which is not a substrate for prenyltransferases; this form of RhoB is not membrane associated and is without biological function. It is used as a negative control in transfection studies.

Northern Blot Analysis.
RNA was isolated from cells grown in the presence or absence of FTI under conditions described in the figure legends. Total cell RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) as suggested by the manufacturer. RNA (15 µg) was size fractionated on 1% denaturing formaldehyde gels and transferred onto nylon membranes (Hybond-N+; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). cDNA probes used for the detection of fas and vegf RNAs and Northern blot analysis were as described previously (23) . For determination of the effect of FTI on fas mRNA half-life, C3HpBRas cells were grown in the presence or absence of FTI for 48 h, and then actinomycin D was added to a final concentration of 2 µg/ml. Total cellular RNA was harvested at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after the addition of actinomycin D.

Flow Cytometric Analysis.
Cells were grown in the presence or absence of 1 µM FTI for 48 h. IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} were included in the culture medium for the final 18 h. Cells were then harvested and stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated hamster antimurine Fas MoAb Jo2 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or with an isotype-matched control for 45 min on ice. Cells were washed, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed using a FACScan Flow Cytometer and the Cell Quest program.

Ras Assay and Western Blot Analysis.
The plasmid Raf1 Gst-RBD (Ras binding domain; kindly provided by J. L. Bos, Utrecht, The Netherlands) contains an in-frame fusion protein between GST and amino acids 51–131 of Raf1, which encodes a domain that binds only to the activated, GTP-bound form of Ras (40) . Gst-RBD expression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside, and bacteria were lysed by use of a French press. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation, glycerol was added to 10%, and aliquots were stored at -80°C. For preparation of Gst-RBD bound to Sepharose beads, 50 µl of 20% glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) was mixed with 50 µl of Gst-Raf-RBD bacterial lysate, incubated for 30 min at room temperature with occasional mixing, and washed three times with RIPA buffer. Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EGTA, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, proteinase inhibitors leupeptin, aprotinin, and PMSF]. Cell lysate at 250 µg in 400 µl of RIPA buffer was added to Gst-Raf-RBD beads and rotated at 4°C for 1 h. The complexes were then washed, and the final pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer and boiled to elute bound Ras. Proteins were size-fractionated 10% SDS-3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid NuPAGE gels (Novex, San Diego, CA), transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and probed with Ras MoAb Y13-259 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Ras protein was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).

Morphological Analysis of Apoptosis.
Cells were cultured at 1 x 105 cells/well in six-well plates with or without FTI for 48 h. In some cultures, IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} (100 units/ml) were added for the final 18 h. Anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 or isotype-matched control antibody was added to wells at the concentration of 1 µg/ml for an additional 6 h. In indicated cultures, the broad specificity apoptosis inhibitor BOC (25 µM; Enzyme Systems Products, Livermore, CA) was added 30 min before the addition of antibody. For determination of the percentage of apoptotic cells, photomicroscopy was performed using an Olympus IX70 microscope. These photographs were used to enumerate the cells with normal or apoptotic morphology, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined. At least 200 cells were counted for each data point.

Analysis of Cell Death by Trypan Blue Exclusion.
Cells were cultured with or without FTI for 48 h, and in the presence or absence of cytokine during the final 18 h. The anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 or an isotype-matched control antibody control was added at 1 µg/ml. After an additional 6 h of culture, adherent and floating cells were collected and counted after a 1:1 dilution with trypan blue. Experiments were performed twice, and duplicate wells were analyzed in each experiment. Data are expressed as the percentage of dead (apoptotic) cells in the total cell population.

Caspase Assays.
Cells were cultured with or without FTI for 48 h, and in the presence or absence of cytokine for the final 18 h. Anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 isotype control was added at 1 µg/ml. After 6 h incubation, cells were pelleted and lysed in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 4 mM NaPPi, 10 mM NaF, 2 mM NaVO4, 1 mM PMSF, 100 mM NaCl, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 rpm, 4°C, and extracts were aliquoted and stored at -80°C. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Caspase assays were performed in 96-well plates. Each well contained 200 µl of caspase assay buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 2 mM DTT] to which 10 µg of cell extract and 10 µM Ac-DEVD-AMC fluorogenic substrate (BD PharMingen) were added. The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Measurement of the AMC cleavage product was performed using a CytoFluor II Microplate Fluorescence Reader (PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc., Bedford, MA). Experiments were performed in triplicate, and results were expressed as the mean ± SE.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
FTI Reverses Ras-mediated Inhibition of Fas mRNA Expression.
To determine the level of fas gene expression under various culture conditions, RNA from C3H10T1/2 parental or Ras-transformed cells was subject to Northern blot analysis. Consistent with our previous data (23) , C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts express low levels of fas mRNA, and this is greatly up-regulated by culture in the presence of the inflammatory cytokines IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} (Fig. 1Citation , Lanes 1 and 2). Pools of Ras-transformed fibroblasts were generated by infection of C3H10T1/2 with the retrovirus pBabe-Ras, which encodes an activated H-ras (position 12 valine). These cells exhibit undetectable basal levels of fas mRNA and much lower levels of cytokine-induced fas mRNA expression (Fig. 1Citation , Lanes 5 and 6) compared with C3HpBpuro control cells. Similar results were obtained with a Ras-transformed clone of C3H10T1/2 (61LpBpuro; Fig.1Citation , Lanes 9 and 10). To determine the effect of FTI on fas expression by these cell lines, cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence of 1 µM FTI. IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} were added to some cultures for the final 18 h of the incubation period, and mRNA was analyzed. FTI had modest effects on C3HpBpuro cells, inducing an increase in fas mRNA levels in the absence of cytokines (compare Fig. 1Citation Lanes 1 and 3). FTI treatment of C3HpBRas also resulted in a significant increase in basal levels of fas mRNA expression (Fig. 1Citation , Lane 5 versus Lane 7) and a notable increase in cytokine-induced levels (Fig. 1Citation , Lane 6 versus Lane 8). Similar FTI-induced increases in fas mRNA were obtained with the 61LpBpuro clone (Fig. 1Citation , Lane 9 versus Lane 11). Of note, cytokine-induced levels of fas mRNA in the Ras-transformed cell lines increased to control levels after treatment with FTI (compare in Fig. 1Citation , Lanes 8 and 12 with the control Lane 4). These data indicate that FTI can reverse the Ras-mediated inhibition of fas mRNA expression under basal and cytokine-induced conditions.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Culture of Ras-transformed cells in FTI up-regulates expression of the fas gene yet inhibits levels of vegf mRNA. The C3HpBpuro control cell line, or two Ras-transformed lines, C3HpBRas and 61LpBpuro, were cultured in the presence or absence of 1 µM FTI for 48 h as indicated; in some cultures cytokines (IFN-{gamma} + TNF-{alpha}) were added for the final 18 h. RNA was prepared and Northern blot analysis was performed using the probes indicated along the left. Densitometric analysis of fas mRNA levels was performed using GAPDH as an internal control. Lane 1 was arbitrarily given a value of 1. Relative values were: Lane 1, 1; Lane 2, 45; Lane 3, 8; Lane 4, 41; Lane 5, <1; Lane 6, 8; Lane 7, 7; Lane 8, 40; Lane 9, <1; Lane 10, 8; Lane 11, 5; Lane 12, 37.

 
The level of mRNA encoding the Fas-related death receptor 5 (41) was not regulated by oncogenic Ras, incubation in cytokines, or culture in FTI (Fig. 1Citation , DR5). Expression of the TNF-{alpha} type I receptor mRNA was also not regulated by Ras transformation (data not shown). Therefore, down-regulation of death receptor gene expression is not a general property of Ras transformation.

The secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to be increased by oncogenic Ras (22) . The effect of FTI treatment on vegf gene expression was determined. The up-regulation of vegf RNA expression by oncogenic Ras was demonstrated (Fig. 1Citation ; compare Lane 1 with Lanes 5 and 9). VEGF expression in the untransformed C3HpBpuro control cell line was up-regulated by cytokines, FTI, and the combination of these treatments. The opposite effects were observed in the C3HpBRas and 61LpBpuro lines: incubation in the presence of inflammatory cytokines, FTI, or the combination resulted in an inhibition of vegf mRNA compared with cultures with no additions (Fig. 1Citation ; compare Lane 5 with Lanes 6–8, and Lane 9 with Lanes 10–12). The data demonstrate that effects on cellular mRNA induced by Ras transformation can be reversed by FTI treatment, resulting in either an increase (Fas) or a decrease (VEGF) in the expression of specific genes.

Induction of Fas Plasma Membrane Expression by FTI.
Experiments were performed to determine whether up-regulation of fas mRNA by FTI correlated with an increase in plasma membrane expression. Cells were cultured in 1 µM FTI for 48 h with the addition of IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} for the final 18 h, and stained with the anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 or isotype-matched control. Under these growth conditions, there is significant Fas cell surface expression by C3HpBpuro; this is unchanged by culture in the presence of FTI (Fig. 2B)Citation . In contrast, FTI treatment of Ras-transformed cells induces levels of cell surface Fas expression (Fig. 2, C and D)Citation to nearly that observed in the control cell line (Fig. 2B)Citation . Fig. 2ECitation shows data from the 61LpBFas27 clonal cell line, which was derived by infection of C3H-Ras61L-transformed cells with a retrovirus encoding murine Fas. These cells express Fas under the regulation of the retroviral LTR promoter/enhancer; and, hence, Fas expression is not inhibited by oncogenic Ras (clone 27 expresses Fas levels equal to that of cytokine-treated C3HpBpuro parental lines). As expected, culture in FTI has no effect on Fas expression in this clone, consistent with the hypothesis that oncogenic Ras targets fas expression from the endogenous chromosomal fas gene. These data confirm that FTI can reverse the inhibition of Fas expression at both the RNA and protein levels.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Up-regulation of cell surface Fas in Ras-transformed cells by culture in FTI. Cells were cultured with or without 1 µM FTI for 48 h, with cytokines added for the final 18 h of culture. A, C3HpBRas, a pool generated by infection of C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts with an ecotropic retrovirus expressing activated H-Ras, stained with isotype-matched control antibody. Identical results were obtained when C3HpBpuro control cells were stained with isotype control (data not shown). B, C3HpBpuro cells stained with anti-Fas antibody Jo2 after growth with (+) or without (-) the addition of FTI to the culture medium. C, C3HpBRas cells grown in the presence or absence of FTI and stained with Jo2. D, the Ras-transformed clone 61LpBpuro stained with anti-Fas Jo2. E, the 61LpBFas27 clone, generated by infection of a Hras-61L-expressing clone of C3H10T1/2 with a retrovirus encoding murine Fas. This line was stained with Jo2 after growth in the presence or absence of FTI.

 
FTI Treatment Restores Fas-induced Cell Death.
Ras-transformed murine cell lines are often resistant to Fas-induced death because of inhibition of Fas expression (23) . To determine whether this resistance could be reversed by FTI, the C3HpBpuro and C3HpBRas pools were cultured for 48 h with or without the addition of FTI; in some cultures IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} were added for the final 18 h of the culture period. Cross-linking of Fas was accomplished by the addition of anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 or isotype-matched control antibody. As shown in Table 1Citation , Fas-mediated killing of C3HpBpuro was greatly increased by culture in the presence of cytokines, consistent with the effects of these cytokines on Fas expression. Note that IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}, alone or in combination, are not toxic to any of the cell lines used in this study. Addition of FTI had no significant effect on killing in the presence of cytokines (68.8% versus 72.0%) but did increase Fas-mediated death in the absence of cytokines (11.9% versus 37.6%). This correlates with FTI-induced up-regulation of fas mRNA in C3HpBpuro cells (Fig. 1Citation , Lane 1 versus Lane 3). The pattern of Fas-induced cell death was quite different for the C3HpBRas line. Fas-induced death was equal to control levels when C3HpBRas cells were grown in the absence of cytokines (7.0% versus 6.8%). Addition of cytokines increases this to 13.8%, much less than the 68.8% observed with C3HpBpuro. When FTI is added to C3HpBRas cultures without cytokines, killing increases modestly to 13.4%. Addition of FTI to C3HpBRas cultures containing cytokines increases the frequency of Fas-induced death to 64.5%, nearly equal to levels observed with C3HpBpuro under the same conditions. In contrast, in the Ras-transformed line 61LpBFas27, which constitutively expresses Fas via the retroviral LTR, Fas-mediated death is independent of cytokines, oncogenic Ras, and treatment with FTI. Together, these data confirm the inhibition of Fas-mediated killing by ras oncogenes and demonstrate that Ras-transformed cells can be rendered sensitive to Fas-induced death by treatment with FTI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Reversion of Ras-transformed cells to FAS susceptibility by FTI

 
In a second set of experiments, the mechanism of Fas-induced death was examined. C3HpBpuro and C3HpBRas cells were cultured with or without FTI as described in the previous set of experiments, followed by the addition of Jo2 or control antibody. (Cytokines were added to all cultures for the final 18 h.) However, in some cultures, the pan-caspase inhibitor BOC was added 30 min before the addition of antibody. The C3HpBpuro data (Fig. 3A)Citation demonstrate that the Fas-mediated death was significantly inhibited by BOC, both in the presence and absence of FTI. No Fas-induced death occurred in the C3HpBRas cell line in the absence of FTI, but this was triggered in the presence of FTI. Importantly, this death was also inhibited by BOC (Fig. 3B)Citation . Together, these data are consistent with the notion that death in this system is apoptotic. To further prove this point, the levels of caspase 3 (i.e., DEVD-cleaving) activation were studied. As shown in Fig. 4Citation , high levels of caspase activity were observed when C3HpBpuro cells were exposed to Jo2; FTI treatment had minimal effects on this activity. In contrast, C3HpBRas cells were resistant to Jo2 antibody-induced caspase activation unless cultured in the presence of FTI; under these conditions, caspase activity was induced to levels similar to those of C3HpBpuro cells. Taken together, these data demonstrate that FTI reverses oncogenic Ras-mediated inhibition of Fas-induced apoptosis.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Culture in the presence of FTI reverses the resistance of Ras-transformed cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. C3HpBpuro or C3HpBRas cell lines (pools) were cultured in the presence or absence of 1 µM FTI for 48 h, with the addition of IFN-{gamma} + TNF-{alpha} during the final 18 h of culture. The murine anti-Fas MoAb Jo2 (1 µg/ml) or an isotype-matched control antibody (C) was added to the cultures for 6 h, and cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. The broad specificity caspase inhibitor BOC was added to indicated cultures (25 µM) beginning 30 min before the addition of Jo2. The % Apoptosis represents the percentage of trypan blue-positive cells present in each culture.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Culture in the presence of FTI sensitizes Ras-transformed cells to Fas-mediated caspase activation. C3HpBpuro or C3HpBRas cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of 1 µM FTI, with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} added for the final 18 h. The murine anti-Fas antibody Jo2 (1 µg/ml) or an isotype-matched control antibody (C) was added to the culture medium, and 6 h later, cell extracts were prepared and assayed for the ability to cleave caspase 3 substrate DEVD-7-amino-4-methylcoumadin.

 
Inhibition of Oncogenic Ras Processing by FTI.
To determine the status of oncogenic Ras protein in control and FTI-treated cells, lysates from cells grown in the presence or absence of FTI for 48 h were subjected to a Ras-GTP pull-down assay (40) . As shown in Fig. 5Citation , there are very low levels of Ras-GTP present in growing C3HpBpuro cells (undetectable levels in this experiment; Fig. 5Citation , Lane 1). Under normal growth conditions, C3HpBRas and 61LpBpuro cells express readily detectable levels of Ras-GTP (Fig. 5Citation , Lanes 2 and 4, respectively). After culture for 48 h in FTI, Ras is still detectable, but for both cell lines the levels of full-length Ras have declined significantly (Fig. 5Citation , Lanes 3 and 5). Furthermore, a faint, slower migrating band is observed (Fig. 5Citation , arrow) that corresponds to unprocessed Ras. In addition, two smaller bands are observed that represent Ras degradation products (Fig. 5Citation , arrowheads).

Oncogenic Ras Does Not Alter the Stability of the Fas mRNA.
The Ras-mediated inhibition of Fas expression appears to occur at the mRNA level. A direct role for Ras in regulation of fas gene transcription could explain this; however, effects on the half-life of fas mRNA are also possible. To explore the latter possibility, we cultured C3HpBRas cells with or without FTI for 48 h. RNA was prepared from untreated control cultures, and then actinomycin D was added (2 µg/ml) to block further transcription. RNA was prepared from cultures at 6, 12, and 24 h after addition of actinomycin D, and Northern blot analysis was performed. As demonstrated in Fig. 6Citation , levels of fas mRNA decreased during the culture period in actinomycin D. Although cells grown in FTI expressed higher levels of fas mRNA as expected, densitometric analysis of the rate of mRNA decay (Fig. 6B)Citation showed that the half-life of fas mRNA under the different growth conditions was very similar. Therefore, the increase in fas mRNA levels induced by culture in the presence of FTI cannot be ascribed to increased stability of the fas mRNA.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Culture of Ras-transformed cells in FTI does not increase the half-life of fas mRNA. A, C3HpBRas cells were grown in the presence or absence FTI for 48 h. IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} were added during the final 18 h of culture. Actinomycin D was added to the cultures at 2 µg/ml for the times indicated, and total RNA was isolated. Northern blot analysis was performed, and the filter was hybridized to a murine fas cDNA probe. B, densitometric analysis of the data in A, demonstrating a near-identical half-life for fas mRNA in Ras-transformed cells cultured with or without FTI.

 
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Induce G1 Arrest and Morphological Reversion but Do Not Induce Fas Gene Expression.
We explored other mechanisms to explain the inhibition of fas gene expression by oncogenic Ras and its reversal by FTI. Recent studies indicate that suppressor oncogenes (such as Rb) and dominantly acting oncogenes (such as those generated by translocations in acute leukemias, e.g., PML-RAR{alpha} and AML1-ETO) alter the pattern of gene transcription by the recruitment of histone deacetylase inhibitors to the promoters of genes required for cell cycle progression or for lineage-specific differentiation (42, 43, 44) . We hypothesized that oncogenic Ras could alter tumor cell gene expression through downstream kinase pathways that effect the activities of multiple transcription factors; in the case of the fas gene, this could lead to the assembly of a repressor complex that blocks transcription of the gene. To test this hypothesis, we treated C3HpBRas cells with TSA, a HDAC inhibitor that has been shown to cause morphological reversion and G1 arrest of Ras-transformed cells (45) . As shown in Fig. 7Citation , cells cultured in the presence of TSA for 48 h assume a flat morphology similar to that observed in FTI-treated cells (Fig. 7, E and BCitation , respectively). Both drugs induce a significant arrest in G1 of the cell cycle (Fig. 7G)Citation . When the anti-Fas antibody Jo2 is added to these cultures, >50% of FTI-treated cells undergo rapid induction of apoptosis (Fig. 7C)Citation , whereas TSA-treated cells remain resistant (Fig. 7F)Citation . This suggested that despite its effects on cell growth and morphology, TSA did not overcome the block to fas gene expression. This was shown to be true by culturing C3HpBRas cells in FTI or TSA and analyzing the effects on fas mRNA levels. Consistent with the data in Fig. 1Citation , C3HpBRas cells express very low levels of fas mRNA, which is minimally induced by inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 8Citation , Lanes 1 and 2); addition of FTI to cultures dramatically increases the levels of fas mRNA in the presence of cytokines (Fig. 8Citation , Lane 4). In contrast, there is no enhancement of fas mRNA levels by culture in the presence of TSA (Fig. 8Citation , Lanes 5 and 6); there is low-level induction by cytokines, but no synergistic effect of TSA. Interestingly, although TSA did not effect fas gene expression, it did decrease the level of vegf mRNA in Ras-transformed cells (Fig. 8Citation ; compare Lanes 1 and 5). These studies demonstrate that inhibition of fas gene expression by oncogenic Ras is not mediated by HDAC activity, and that morphological reversion and G1 arrest per se are not sufficient to change the pattern of fas gene expression.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. No inhibition of Fas-mediated apoptosis by HDAC inhibitors. C3HpBRas cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of FTI (1 µM) or TSA (150 nM) for 48 h; cytokines (IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha}; 100 units/ml each) were added for the final 18 h of culture as indicated below. A, C3HpBRas cells cultured without the addition of drugs or cytokines. B, cells were cultured for 48 h in FTI, followed by the addition of cytokines for 18 h. C, cells cultured in FTI and cytokines, followed by the addition of the anti-Fas antibody Jo2 (1 µg/ml) for an additional 6 h. D, C3HpBRas cells cultured for 18 h in the presence of cytokines. E, cells cultured for 48 h in 150 nM TSA with the addition of cytokines for the final 18 h. F, cells cultured in the presence of TSA and cytokines, followed by the addition of Jo2 (1 µg/ml) for an additional 6 h. G, cell cycle analysis of C3HpBRas cells cultured for 48 h in cytokines alone (control), or with the addition of FTI or TSA as indicated.

 


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. HDAC inhibitors fail to induce expression of fas mRNA in Ras-transformed cells. C3HpBRas cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence of FTI (1 µM) or TSA (150 nM) for 48 h; where indicated, cytokines (IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha}; 100 units/ml each) were added for the final 18 h of the culture period. RNA was extracted, and the Northern blot was hybridized to a FAS probe or a VEGF probe as indicated. Lane 1, cells cultured in the absence of drug or cytokines; Lane 2, cells cultured for 18 h in the presence of cytokines; Lane 3, cells cultured for 48 h in FTI; Lane 4, cells cultured in FTI with the addition of cytokines; Lane 5, cells cultured for 48 h in TSA alone; Lane 6, cells cultured in TSA with the addition of cytokines. The lower panel shows the ethidium bromide-stained gel that demonstrates equal levels of RNA loading.

 
Role of RhoB in Fas Gene Expression.
The antiproliferative effects of FTI are thought not to act by direct inhibition of Ras, but rather by effects on other farnesylated cellular proteins, especially RhoB (46) . Data indicate that when FT is inhibited, unprocessed RhoB is diverted to GGT-I, with an increase in RhoB-GG (46) . RhoB-GG induces growth arrest and apoptosis in a number of cell types, and the absence of RhoB renders cells resistant to FTI (39) . We therefore attempted to stably express various forms of RhoB in C3HpBRas fibroblasts; these included an activated form (V14), one encoding a GGT-I CAAX box (referred to as RhoB-GG), and one lacking a CAAX-box that was therefore not prenylated (called RhoB-Dead). When these expression vectors were introduced into C3HpBras, G418-resistant lines were obtained, but only the nonfunctional RhoB-DEAD form was expressed, whereas no expression of HA-tagged RhoB-V14 or RhoB-GG was detected (data not shown). A transient assay system was then tested for effects of RhoB expression. C3HpBRas cells were cotransfected with RhoB and EGFP expression vectors, and 24 h later, the viability of cells expressing EGFP was determined. As shown in Fig. 9ACitation , the RhoB-Dead vector had no effects on cell viability. In these experiments, parallel cultures received either no treatment (Fig. 9A; C)Citation , or the addition of FTI (Fig. 9A; F)Citation , GGTI (Fig. 9A; G)Citation , or FTI plus GGTI (Fig. 9A; B)Citation during the final 18 h of culture. These drugs had no effect on viability of RhoB-Dead-transfected cells. In contrast, RhoB-GG-transfected cells demonstrated >50% death of transfected cells; this was unaffected by FTI, but the toxicity was blocked when GGTI was added to the cultures. Of importance, in the presence of both drugs the RhoB-GG-induced cell death was blocked. Similar results were obtained with RhoB-V14, confirming that the farnesylated form of RhoB is not toxic but, rather, the RhoB-GG mediates cell death. (Note that in the presence of FTI, RhoB is preferentially GG modified, which is toxic; in the presence of GGTI, RhoB is farnesylated, but not GG modified, and no toxicity ensues.) In these transient assays, the expression of all three HA-tagged isoforms of RhoB was confirmed by anti-HA Western blots (data not shown). We surmise that in these experiments, a significant portion of RhoB-V14 is GG modified, and the toxic effects of this RhoB isoform are inhibited by GGTI.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 9. The FTI-induced up-regulation of Fas expression is not mediated by RhoB-GG. A, overexpression of RhoB-GG or RhoB-V14 is toxic to C3HpBRas cells, and this toxicity requires activity of GGT-I. C3HpBRas cells were transfected with vectors expressing the indicated form of RhoB (see legend below each group of four columns): in all cases, cells were cotransfected with an EGFP-expressing vector to identify transfected cells. Medium was removed 6 h after the transfection, and fresh medium was added that contained DMSO only (C), 1 µM FTI (F), 10 µM GGTI (G), or both FTI and GGTI (B). Cells were analyzed 24 h after transfection for the appearance of dead cells: green cells were assessed for normal versus apoptotic morphology. At least 200 green cells were assessed for each experimental point. B, death induced by overexpression of RhoB does not result from caspase activation. C3HpBRas cells were transfected with vectors expressing RhoB-Dead, RhoB-GG, or RhoB-V14. After 24 h (when approximately 50% of the cells demonstrated apoptotic morphology), cell extracts were prepared for caspase assay. In the lane marked Jo2, C3HpBRas cells were treated with FTI and cytokines for 48 h, followed by the addition of Jo2 for 6 h (resulting in 50% apoptotic cells), and extracts were prepared as a positive control for the caspase assay. C, lack of evidence for a role of RhoB in FTI-mediated up-regulation of Fas expression. C3HpBRas cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of FTI (1 µM) or GGTI (10 µM) as indicated; all cultures received cytokines (IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha}; 100 units/ml each) for the final 18 h of culture. Where indicated, Jo2 (1 µg/ml) was added for an additional 6 h. Photomicrographs were taken, and the number of viable and apoptotic cells was determined based on cell morphology. At least 200 cells were analyzed for each data point.

 
The above data were consistent with the hypothesis that RhoB-GG could be responsible for FTI-induced death, possibly by up-regulating the expression of Fas. However, additional experiments made this hypothesis unlikely. C3HpBRas cells were transfected with RhoB-Dead, RhoB-GG, and RhoB-V14 vectors, and 24 h later (when approximately 50% of RhoB-GG and RhoB-V14 cells were dead), caspase assays were performed (Fig. 9B)Citation . As a control, cells were cultured in FTI and cytokines, and Jo2 was added for 6 h (approximately 50% cell death). In contrast to Jo2-treated cells, there is virtually no induction of caspase activity during the death induced by RhoB overexpression. This makes it unlikely that RhoB-induced death in this system works through the Fas death receptor and indicates that death occurs through a caspase-independent pathway. A second experiment directly asked whether inhibition of RhoB-GG formation using GGTI (which is a highly effective inhibitor, as shown in Fig. 9ACitation ) would inhibit the effects of FTI on Fas-mediated killing. C3HpBRas cells were cultured in the presence of FTI, GGTI, or both for 48 h, followed by the addition of Jo2 (all cultures received cytokines for the final 18 h). Neither controls nor GGTI-treated cells were sensitive to Jo2 (Fig. 9CCitation , Lanes 1–4). FTI-treated cells were susceptible to Fas-induced death when cytokines were present (Fig. 9CCitation , Lane 6), and the addition of GGTI to FTI-treated cultures did not inhibit FTI-mediated Fas up-regulation (Fig. 9CCitation , Lane 8). These data indicate that although GGTI is an effective inhibitor of RhoB-GG-mediated death (Fig. 9A)Citation , it does not prevent FTI-mediated, Fas-induced cell death. Therefore, FTI up-regulation of Fas is independent of RhoB.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The development of the malignant phenotype occurs in part through the acquisition of genetic lesions that abrogate apoptotic pathways of the evolving tumor cells. This enables tumor clones to bypass controls on proliferation (i.e., restriction point control at the G1-S boundary) that would otherwise trigger programmed cell death, and to avoid apoptosis induced by therapeutic agents such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. By understanding the molecular mechanisms governing resistance to apoptosis, drugs can be devised to reverse this inhibition and render tumor cells sensitive to therapeutic agents. In this paper we describe one model system in which we reverse resistance to apoptosis induced by the ras oncogene and demonstrate the molecular mechanism of this reversal.

Our previous work showed that Ras transformation can induce down-regulation of fas gene expression, thus rendering tumor cells resistant to Fas-induced apoptosis (23) . Oncogenic Ras inhibited fas gene expression under normal growth conditions and those that mimic an inflammatory tumor milieu, in which the inflammatory cytokines IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} normally up-regulate Fas expression and render cells sensitive to cross-linking by FasL-expressing T cells or natural killer cells. Killing of Ras-transformed cells was inhibited under these conditions. We now confirm and extend these results by demonstrating that treatment of Ras-transformed cells with FTI reverses the block to fas gene expression. FTI treatment induces an increase in fas mRNA expression under basal and cytokine-induced conditions, and an increase in Fas plasma membrane expression that was sufficient to render the FTI-treated tumor cells sensitive to Fas-induced death. Although the changes in the level of cell surface Fas expression were not dramatic, data in other systems demonstrate that similar degrees of change in Fas expression can alter the sensitivity of target cells to death induction (47 , 48) . We show that the increased levels of fas mRNA after FTI treatment are most likely attributable to increased transcription, because the half-life of fas mRNA is identical before and after treatment with FTI. This is an important observation, because the fas mRNA contains multiple AU-rich elements that could confer differential regulation of the mRNA half-life under different physiological conditions (49) . Changes in the rate of fas mRNA processing or nuclear transport have not been excluded.

Oncogenic Ras has opposing influences on the regulation of two critical genes involved in host-tumor interactions: up-regulation of VEGF expression that should promote tumor growth through increased angiogenesis, and inhibition of Fas expression that could enable the tumor to escape immunosurveillance. Our data demonstrate that FTI treatment can reverse both of these events. This may help to explain the efficacy observed for FTI treatment in murine animal models in vivo (34) . We speculate that the differential effects of oncogenic Ras on fas and vegf gene expression occur through opposing actions at the respective promoters. The mechanisms by which this occurs are unknown, although changes in the pattern of gene transcription are often regulated at the level of chromatin structure, such as the status of histone acetylation (50, 51, 52) . Accordingly, we examined the effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA on the expression of the fas and vegf genes in our system. TSA induced morphological reversion and growth arrest of Ras-transformed cells as described by others (45) ; however, unlike FTI, it did not up-regulate fas gene expression (Fig. 8)Citation . With respect to regulation of fas gene expression by oncogenic Ras, we conclude that (a) Ras inhibition of fas expression is not mediated by histone deacetylation; and (b) phenotypic reversion and growth arrest per se are not sufficient to up-regulate fas gene expression. It is likely that the negative effect of oncogenic Ras on fas gene expression occurs at the level of the Fas promoter through mechanisms that do not involve recruitment of co-repressor/HDAC complexes (53) .

In contrast, both TSA and FTI led to a down-regulation of vegf mRNA in Ras-transformed cells. Oncogenic Ras is known to up-regulate expression of VEGF, acting via either the Raf/MAPK or the PI3K pathway (54 , 55) . Hence, inhibition of VEGF expression by FTI is not surprising and has been observed previously (22) . The mechanism by which TSA inhibits VEGF expression in Ras-transformed cells is less clear. Others have recently shown that increased VEGF expression by cancer cells is attributable to increased HDAC activity, which leads to transcriptional repression of the p53 and VHL tumor suppressor genes (56) . It was demonstrated that TSA inhibited tumor VEGF expression by up-regulating p53 and VHL, and causing repression of the transcription factor HIF-1{alpha}, a key positive regulator of VEGF gene expression (56) . A model can be proposed in which oncogenic Ras up-regulates VEGF expression through induction of HDAC activity; this could act to repress p53 and VHL, stabilizing HIF-1{alpha}, and leading to increase vegf gene expression (57) . This model is currently being tested. These studies represent the first demonstration that up-regulation of vegf gene expression by oncogenic Ras can be inhibited by HDAC inhibitors.

FTIs were initially developed as a class of drugs for which the main mechanism of antiproliferative action was thought to be inhibition of Ras function (32) . However, a variety of studies have led to the concept that other farnesylated cellular proteins may be the true targets of FTI, and most data implicate RhoB (46 , 58) . As put forth by G. C. Prendergast and colleagues, the FTI-Rho hypothesis states that in the presence of FTI, RhoB prenylation shifts to RhoB-GG modification, and these authors have demonstrated that RhoB-GG mediates growth inhibition and apoptosis when expressed ectopically (39) . Furthermore, the requirement for RhoB in FTI-mediated antiproliferative events has recently been demonstrated using murine embryo fibroblasts from RhoB knockout mice (59) . We examined the possibility that the effects of FTI on Fas expression observed in our system were mediated by RhoB-GG. The data in Fig. 9Citation demonstrate that RhoB-GG is toxic when overexpressed in Ras-transformed cells and kills by a caspase-independent mechanism. Interestingly, the morphology of cells appears apoptotic, and the mechanism of RhoB-GG-induced death remains unclear. When GGTI is added to cells cultured in FTI, there is no inhibition of FTI-induced up-regulation of fas gene expression or Fas-induced apoptosis. From these data we conclude that RhoB-GG is not required for changes in the pattern of fas gene expression mediated by FTI and must occur through a different molecular pathway.

Under what clinical circumstances might down-reglation of Fas be of significance? The potential role of the Fas/FasL death signal in immune-mediated tumor killing has been discussed above. The role of the Fas/FasL system in chemotherapy-induced apoptosis remains controversial (60) . This model postulates that chemotherapy induces expression of FasL on tumor cells, with subsequent ligation of Fas causing tumor cell death. Although it appears clear that many chemotherapeutic agents induce cancer cell death through apoptosis, in most cases this seems to occur through the mitochondrial pathway with the generation of the Apaf-1/caspase 9/cytochrome c complex (60) . However, in the case of 5-FU treatment of colon cancer cell lines, it appears that there may be a critical role for the Fas/FasL system, because death is inhibited by blocking antibodies directed against Fas or FasL (61, 62, 63) . In the context of the data presented here, it will be of interest to determine whether oncogenic Ras can render colon cancer cells resistant to 5-FU by inhibition of Fas expression. If this does occur, then one may expect to see a synergy between FTI and 5-FU in the treatment of colorectal cancers.

At least five different FTIs have entered clinical testing. Correlative laboratory studies are in progress to better define the precise intracellular target(s) of FTI action and to develop clinical markers of FT inhibition in patient samples (36 , 38) . We suggest that clinical assays should also be developed to monitor effects of FTI on the expression of genes involved in host-tumor interaction, such as Fas and VEGF. It should be noted that the work presented in this study used the H-Ras oncogene, and that targeting the K-Ras and N-ras oncogenes by FTI may prove more difficult.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Hyun-Ho Chung (LG Chemical Ltd., Taejon, Korea) for kindly providing the farnesyltransferase inhibitor LB42722.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Bressler Research Building, Room 7-023, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. Phone: (410) 328-0372; Fax: (410) 328-6559; E-mail: rfent001{at}umaryland.edu Back

2 The abbreviations used are: ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; TNF-{alpha}, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}; FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; LTR, long terminal repeat; HA, hemagglutinin; RIPA, radioimmunoprecipitation assay; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; MoAb, monoclonal antibody; GGTI, geranylgeranyl-transferase inhibitor; TSA, trichostatin A; HDAC, histone deacetylase inhibitor; RhoB-GG, geranylgeranyl-modified RhoB; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GGT-I, geranylgeranyltransferase type I; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil. Back

Received 6/ 6/01. Accepted 11/14/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Spencer C. A., Groudine M. Control of c-myc regulation in normal and neoplastic cells. Adv. Cancer Res., 56: 1-48, 1991.[Medline]
  2. Bos J. L. Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review[published erratum appears in Cancer Res., 50: 1352, 1990]. Cancer Res., 49: 4682-4689, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Weinberg R. A. The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell, 81: 323-330, 1995.[Medline]
  4. Levine A. J. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell, 88: 323-331, 1997.[Medline]
  5. Reed J. C. Bcl-2 family proteins. Oncogene, 17: 3225-3236, 1998.[Medline]
  6. Pardoll D. M. Inducing autoimmune disease to treat cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 5340-5342, 1999.[Free Full Text]
  7. Woodhouse E. C., Chuaqui R. F., Liotta L. A. General mechanisms of metastasis. Cancer (Phila.), 80: 1529-1537, 1997.[Medline]
  8. Downward J. Ras signalling and apoptosis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 8: 49-54, 1998.[Medline]
  9. Schaeffer H. J., Weber M. J. Mitogen-activated protein kinases: specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 2435-2444, 1999.[Free Full Text]
  10. Bonni A., Brunet A., West A. E., Datta S. R., Takasu M. A., Greenberg M. E. Cell survival promoted by the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway by transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms[see comments]. Science (Wash. DC), 286: 1358-1362, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Marais R., Wynne J., Treisman R. The SRF accessory protein Elk-1 contains a growth factor-regulated transcriptional activation domain. Cell, 73: 381-393, 1993.[Medline]
  12. Lavoie J. N., L’Allemain G., Brunet A., Muller R., Pouyssegur J. Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 20608-20616, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Leone G., DeGregori J., Sears R., Jakoi L., Nevins J. R. Myc and Ras collaborate in inducing accumulation of active cyclin E/Cdk2 and E2F[published erratum appears in Nature (Lond.), 387: 932, 1997]. Nature (Lond.), 387: 422-426, 1997.[Medline]
  14. Marte B. M., Downward J. PKB/Akt: connecting phosphoinositide 3-kinase to cell survival and beyond. Trends Biochem. Sci., 22: 355-358, 1997.[Medline]
  15. Cardone M. H., Roy N., Stennicke H. R., Salvesen G. S., Franke T. F., Stanbridge E., Frisch S., Reed J. C. Regulation of cell death protease caspase-9 by phosphorylation[see comments]. Science (Wash. DC), 282: 1318-1321, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Datta S. R., Dudek H., Tao X., Masters S., Fu H., Gotoh Y., Greenberg M. E. Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell, 91: 231-241, 1997.[Medline]
  17. Beg A. A., Baltimore D. An essential role for NF-{kappa}B in preventing TNF-{alpha}-induced cell death[see comments]. Science (Wash. DC), 274: 782-784, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Brunet A., Bonni A., Zigmond M. J., Lin M. Z., Juo P., Hu L. S., Anderson M. J., Arden K. C., Blenis J., Greenberg M. E. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell, 96: 857-868, 1999.[Medline]
  19. Mayo M. W., Wang C. Y., Cogswell P. C., Rogers-Graham K. S., Lowe S. W., Der C. J., Baldwin A. S., Jr. Requirement of NF-{kappa}B activation to suppress p53-independent apoptosis induced by oncogenic Ras. Science (Wash. DC), 278: 1812-1815, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Qiu R. G., Chen J., Kirn D., McCormick F., Symons M. An essential role for Rac in Ras transformation. Nature (Lond.), 374: 457-459, 1995.[Medline]
  21. Arbiser J. L., Moses M. A., Fernandez C. A., Ghiso N., Cao Y., Klauber N., Frank D., Brownlee M., Flynn E., Parangi S., Byers H. R., Folkman J. Oncogenic H-ras stimulates tumor angiogenesis by two distinct pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 861-866, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rak J., Mitsuhashi Y., Bayko L., Filmus J., Shirasawa S., Sasazuki T., Kerbel R. S. Mutant ras oncogenes up-regulate VEGF/VPF expression: implications for induction and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res., 55: 4575-4580, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fenton R. G., Hixon J. A., Wright P. W., Brooks A. D., Sayers T. J. Inhibition of Fas (CD95) expression and Fas-mediated apoptosis by oncogenic Ras. Cancer Res., 58: 3391-3400, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Peli J., Schroter M., Rudaz C., Hahne M., Meyer C., Reichmann E., Tschopp J. Oncogenic Ras inhibits Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis by downregulating the expression of Fas. EMBO J., 18: 1824-1831, 1999.[Medline]
  25. Nagata S. Apoptosis by death factor. Cell, 88: 355-365, 1997.[Medline]
  26. Boldin M. P., Varfolomeev E. E., Pancer Z., Mett I. L., Camonis J. H., Wallach D. A novel protein that interacts with the death domain of Fas/APO1 contains a sequence motif related to the death domain. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 7795-7798, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chinnaiyan A. M., O’Rourke K., Tewari M., Dixit V. M. FADD, a novel death domain-containing protein, interacts with the death domain of Fas and initiates apoptosis. Cell, 81: 505-512, 1995.[Medline]
  28. Boldin M. P., Goncharov T. M., Goltsev Y. V., Wallach D. Involvement of MACH, a novel MORT1/FADD-interacting protease, in Fas/APO-1- and TNF receptor-induced cell death. Cell, 85: 803-815, 1996.[Medline]
  29. Muzio M., Chinnaiyan A. M., Kischkel F. C., O’Rourke K., Shevchenko A., Ni J., Scaffidi C., Bretz J. D., Zhang M., Gentz R., Mann M., Krammer P. H., Peter M. E., Dixit V. M. FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death-inducing signaling complex. Cell, 85: 817-827, 1996.[Medline]
  30. Garrett M. D., Workman P. Discovering novel chemotherapeutic drugs for the third millennium. Eur. J. Cancer, 35: 2010-2030, 1999.
  31. Magee T., Marshall C. New insights into the interaction of Ras with the plasma membrane[see comments]. Cell, 98: 9-12, 1999.[Medline]
  32. Gibbs J. B., Oliff A., Kohl N. E. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: Ras research yields a potential cancer therapeutic. Cell, 77: 175-178, 1994.[Medline]
  33. Kohl N. E., Mosser S. D., deSolms S. J., Giuliani E. A., Pompliano D. L., Graham S. L., Smith R. L., Scolnick E. M., Oliff A., Gibbs J. B. Selective inhibition of ras-dependent transformation by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor[see comments]. Science (Wash. DC), 260: 1934-1937, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kohl N., Omer C., Conner M., Anthony N., Davide J., de Solms S., Guiliani E., Gomez R., Graham S., Hamilton K., Handt L., Hartman G., Koblan K., Kral A., et al Inhibition of farnesyltransferase induces regression of mammary and salivary carcinomas in ras transgenic mice. Nat. Med., 1: 792-797, 1995.[Medline]
  35. Lebowitz P. F., Davide J. P., Prendergast G. C. Evidence that farnesyltransferase inhibitors suppress Ras transformation by interfering with Rho activity. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 6613-6622, 1995.[Abstract]
  36. Adjei A. A., Davis J. N., Erlichman C., Svingen P. A., Kaufmann S. H. Comparison of potential markers of farnesyltransferase inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 2318-2325, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Beck L. A., Hosick T. J., Sinensky M. Isoprenylation is required for the processing of the lamin A precursor. J. Cell Biol., 110: 1489-1499, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Karp J. E., Lancet J. E., Kaufmann S. H., End D. W., Wright J. J., Bol K., Horak I., Tidwell M. L., Liesveld J., Kottke T. J., Ange D., Buddharaju L., Gojo I., Highsmith W. E., et al Clinical and biologic activity of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias: a Phase I clinical-laboratory correlative trial. Blood, 97: 3361-3369, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Du W., Lebowitz P. F., Prendergast G. C. Cell growth inhibition by farnesyltransferase inhibitors is mediated by gain of geranylgeranylated RhoB. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 1831-1840, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. de Rooij J., Bos J. L. Minimal Ras-binding domain of Raf1 can be used as an activation-specific probe for Ras. Oncogene, 14: 623-625, 1997.[Medline]
  41. French L. E., Tschopp J. The TRAIL to selective tumor death[see comments]. Nat. Med., 5: 146-147, 1999.[Medline]
  42. Gelmetti V., Zhang J., Fanelli M., Minucci S., Pelicci P. G., Lazar M. A. Aberrant recruitment of the nuclear receptor corepressor-histone deacetylase complex by the acute myeloid leukemia fusion partner ETO. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 7185-7191, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Grignani F., De Matteis S., Nervi C., Tomassoni L., Gelmetti V., Cioce M., Fanelli M., Ruthardt M., Ferrara F. F., Zamir I., Seiser C., Lazar M. A., Minucci S., Pelicci P. G. Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature (Lond.), 391: 815-818, 1998.[Medline]
  44. Lin R. J., Nagy L., Inoue S., Shao W., Miller W. H., Jr., Evans R. M. Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature (Lond.), 391: 811-814, 1998.[Medline]
  45. Futamura M., Monden Y., Okabe T., Fujita-Yoshigaki J., Yokoyama S., Nishimura S. Trichostatin A inhibits both ras-induced neurite outgrowth of PC12 cells and morphological transformation of NIH3T3 cells. Oncogene, 10: 1119-1123, 1995.[Medline]
  46. Lebowitz P. F., Prendergast G. C. Non-ras targets of farnesyltransferase inhibitors: focus on Rho. Oncogene, 17: 1439-1445, 1998.[Medline]
  47. Fulda S., Los M., Friesen C., Debatin K. M. Chemosensitivity of solid tumor cells in vitro is related to activation of the CD95 system. Int. J. Cancer, 76: 105-114, 1998.[Medline]
  48. Chan H., Bartos D. P., Owen-Schaub L. B. Activation-dependent transcriptional regulation of the human Fas promoter requires NF-{kappa}B p50–p65 recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 2098-2108, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Shaw G., Kamen R. A conserved AU sequence from the 3' untranslated region of GM-CSF mRNA mediates selective mRNA degradation. Cell, 46: 659-667, 1986.[Medline]
  50. Struhl K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev., 12: 599-606, 1998.[Free Full Text]
  51. Torchia J., Glass C., Rosenfeld M. G. Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10: 373-383, 1998.[Medline]
  52. Criqui-Filipe P., Ducret C., Maira S. M., Wasylyk B. Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation. EMBO J., 18: 3392-3403, 1999.[Medline]
  53. Tyler J. K., Kadonaga J. T. The "dark side" of chromatin remodeling: repressive effects on transcription. Cell, 99: 443-446, 1999.[Medline]
  54. Chen C., Pore N., Behrooz A., Ismail-Beigi F., Maity A. Regulation of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Interaction between H-ras and hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 9519-9525, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Berra E., Pages G., Pouyssegur J. MAP kinases and hypoxia in the control of VEGF expression. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 19: 139-145, 2000.[Medline]
  56. Kim M. S., Kwon H. J., Lee Y. M., Baek J. H., Jang J. E., Lee S. W., Moon E. J., Kim H. S., Lee S. K., Chung H. Y., Kim C. W., Kim K. W. Histone deacetylases induce angiogenesis by negative regulation of tumor suppressor genes. Nat. Med., 7: 437-443, 2001.[Medline]
  57. Carmeliet P., Dor Y., Herbert J. M., Fukumura D., Brusselmans K., Dewerchin M., Neeman M., Bono F., Abramovitch R., Maxwell P., Koch C. J., Ratcliffe P., Moons L., Jain R. K., Collen D., Keshert E., Keshet E. Role of HIF-1{alpha} in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumour angiogenesis. Nature (Lond.), 394: 485-490, 1998.[Medline]
  58. Cox A. D., Der C. J. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors and cancer treatment: targeting simply Ras?. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1333: F51-F71, 1997.[Medline]
  59. Liu A., Du W., Liu J. P., Jessell T. M., Prendergast G. C. RhoB alteration is necessary for apoptotic and antineoplastic responses to farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 6105-6113, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Kaufmann S. H., Earnshaw W. C. Induction of apoptosis by cancer chemotherapy. Exp. Cell Res., 256: 42-49, 2000.[Medline]
  61. Backus H. H., Dukers D. F., van Groeningen C. J., Vos W., Bloemena E., Wouters D., van Riel J. M., Smid K., Giaccone G., Pinedo H. M., Peters G. J. 5-Fluorouracil induced Fas up-regulation associated with apoptosis in liver metastases of colorectal cancer patients. Ann. Oncol., 12: 209-216, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Houghton J. A., Harwood F. G., Tillman D. M. Thymineless death in colon carcinoma cells is mediated via fas signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 8144-8149, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Tillman D. M., Petak I., Houghton J. A. A Fas-dependent component in 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-induced cytotoxicity in colon carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 425-430, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Herrmann, L. Grosse-Hovest, T. Otz, P. H. Krammer, H.-G. Rammensee, and G. Jung
Construction of Optimized Bispecific Antibodies for Selective Activation of the Death Receptor CD95
Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 1221 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Raponi, J.-L. Harousseau, J. E. Lancet, B. Lowenberg, R. Stone, Y. Zhang, W. Rackoff, Y. Wang, and D. Atkins
Identification of Molecular Predictors of Response in a Study of Tipifarnib Treatment in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 2254 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. E. Lancet, I. Gojo, J. Gotlib, E. J. Feldman, J. Greer, J. L. Liesveld, L. M. Bruzek, L. Morris, Y. Park, A. A. Adjei, et al.
A phase 2 study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in poor-risk and elderly patients with previously untreated acute myelogenous leukemia
Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1387 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Tefferi
Pathogenesis of Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Metaplasia
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8520 - 8530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Pan and S.-C. J. Yeung
Recent Advances in Understanding the Antineoplastic Mechanisms of Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9109 - 9112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Ferguson, L. E. Rodriguez, J. P. Palma, M. Refici, K. Jarvis, J. O'Connor, G. M. Sullivan, D. Frost, K. Marsh, J. Bauch, et al.
Antitumor Activity of Orally Bioavailable Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor, ABT-100, Is Mediated by Antiproliferative, Proapoptotic, and Antiangiogenic Effects in Xenograft Models
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 3045 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Takada, F. R. Khuri, and B. B. Aggarwal
Protein Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor (SCH 66336) Abolishes NF-{kappa}B Activation Induced by Various Carcinogens and Inflammatory Stimuli Leading to Suppression of NF-{kappa}B-regulated Gene Expression and Up-regulation of Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26287 - 26299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
K. Hiatt, D. A. Ingram, H. Huddleston, D. F. Spandau, R. Kapur, and D. W. Clapp
Loss of the Nf1 Tumor Suppressor Gene Decreases Fas Antigen Expression in Myeloid Cells
Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2004; 164(4): 1471 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. B. Brunner, S. M. Hahn, A. K. Gupta, R. J. Muschel, W. G. McKenna, and E. J. Bernhard
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors: An Overview of the Results of Preclinical and Clinical Investigations
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5656 - 5668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Ruiz-Ruiz, G. Robledo, E. Cano, J. M. Redondo, and A. Lopez-Rivas
Characterization of p53-mediated Up-regulation of CD95 Gene Expression upon Genotoxic Treatment in Human Breast Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 31667 - 31675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Cortes, M. Albitar, D. Thomas, F. Giles, R. Kurzrock, A. Thibault, W. Rackoff, C. Koller, S. O'Brien, G. Garcia-Manero, et al.
Efficacy of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in chronic myeloid leukemia and other hematologic malignancies
Blood, March 1, 2003; 101(5): 1692 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, R. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online