| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 [K. B. E., R. L. H-P., S. A. R., M. J. P., M. H. B-H.]; Division of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235 [C. A.]; Department of Radiology, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [R. W.]; and Mt. Zion Cancer Research Institute, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0875 [R. J. A.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-irradiation using a dose rate of 24 cGy/min to total dose of 5 Gy. Dosimetry was determined using a Victoreen ionization chamber before each experiment. Estrus was staged using cytological characteristics of vaginal smears at the time of irradiation and confirmed postmortem by uterine wet weight. Animals from each group were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and cervical dislocation at the indicated times with institutional review and approval in accordance with American Association of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines.
Immunofluorescence.
Freshly dissected inguinal mammary glands and embryos were embedded in Tissue-Tek compound (Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Torrance, CA), immediately frozen in a dry ice/ethanol bath, and stored at -80°C. Cryosections (5 µm) were cut at -30°C onto gelatin-coated coverslips. Immunostaining to differentiate between active and latent TGF-ß1 was conducted as described previously (5)
. Sections were fixed using 2% buffered paraformaldehyde, followed by a 0.1 M glycine/PBS wash for the following antibodies: goat anti-LAP (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), chicken anti-TGF-ß1 antibodies (AF-101-NA, Lots # FS03 and # FS08; R&D Systems), Smad 2/3 (FL-425; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and PCNA fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). For PCNA, paraformaldehyde was followed by 10 min in methanol at 4°C. Phospho-specific antibodies to p53 Ser-18P (Cell Signaling Technologies, Beverly, MA) were used with sections fixed with 80% methanol for 10 min at -20C°, followed by 3-min fixation with 2% paraformaldehyde and quenching with 0.1 M glycine in PBS. After fixation, nonspecific sites were blocked before addition of primary antibodies were incubated with sections for 1 h at room temperature (p53 Ser-18P) or overnight at 4°C (LAP, TGF-ß1, and Smad 2/3) in a humidified chamber. Sections were washed in PBS containing 0.1% BSA, before incubating with appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h in a dark humidified chamber and washed. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).
Apoptotic Index.
ApopTag (Intergen, Purchase, NY) was used by following the manufacturers protocol with minor modifications. Briefly, fresh frozen sections were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, then in a precooled 2:1 ethanol:acetic acid mixture. Sections were blocked with the supernatant of 0.5% casein in PBS. The terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase stock solution was used at a working strength of 30% for 1 h at 37°C. The stop reaction and FITC anti-digoxigenin antibody steps were followed as written. Sections were counterstained with DAPI and mounted with Vectashield.
Image Acquisition and Analysis.
Images were obtained using a x40, 0.75 numerical aperture Zeiss Neofluar objective on a Zeiss Axiovert equipped with epifluorescence. A multiband pass dichroic mirror, barrier filter, and differential wavelength filter wheel combination was used to selectively excite fluorochromes in sequence. Images were captured using a scientific grade, 12-bit charged coupled device (KAF-1400, 1317 x 1035, 6.8 µm square pixels) digital camera (Xillix, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Images obtained from sections stained in parallel were captured with identical parameters and scaled using Scilimage (TNO Institute of Applied Physics, Delft, the Netherlands). False color images were compiled from gray-scale images of each fluorochrome.
The frequency of cells labeled with markers of apoptosis or proliferation were counted in at least four fields in duplicate sections from three mice or embryos. The number of epithelial nuclei in mammary epithelium or epidermis was counted in each image. Nuclear counts in embryonic liver were based on the total area of DAPI-stained nuclei divided by the mean area of 10 individually segmented nuclei. The percentage of positive cells was the marked/total x 100. Statistical significance of differences between genotypes was determined using the unpaired Students t test (GraphPad PRISM).
Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting.
Tissue extracts from the third and fifth mammary glands flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen were prepared, separated using reducing SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted, and proteins of interest were detected using antibodies localized on film with chemiluminescence using a Pierce SuperSignal system (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Antibodies CM1, CM5, or Pab122 were used to determine total p53, and blots were probed for ß-actin to assess loading. Exposed films were scanned and subjected to densitometric analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-radiation (Fig. 2A)
|
In rapidly proliferating tissues, IR can also induce a transient cell cycle block. Antibodies to PCNA were used to define the frequency of cells in cycle in embryonic tissues after IR (Fig. 2, D and E)
. Proliferation was reduced 23-fold after irradiation in liver and epidermis of both +/+ and +/- embryos. The frequency of proliferating cells was unaffected in irradiated -/- embryos. Together, these data demonstrate that TGF-ß1 abundance dictates cell fate decision in irradiated embryonic as well as adult epithelial tissues.
p53 Stress Response Is Activated in Irradiated Mammary Gland.
Apoptosis is p53 dependent in irradiated mammary gland and embryos (9, 10, 11)
. However, a recent report suggested that mammary gland lacks a classic p53 IR induction, as measured by nuclear immunoreactivity using the CM5 antibody (10)
. Because this antibody many be insensitive to p53 activation status determined by protein modifications, in the current study we used a phosphorylation state-specific antibody. Phosphorylation of Ser-18 (Ser-15 in human) is strongly associated with the cellular response to radiation damage (e.g., apoptosis and cell cycle block) and contributes to p53 protein stability (12)
. The phosphorylation of Ser-18 promotes dissociation of p53 from the MDM2 protein, which otherwise directs p53 proteolysis. Immunoblotting of total mammary gland protein extracts showed that Ser-18P was undetectable in extracts from sham-irradiated tissue. Within 1 h of IR exposure, Ser-18P was significantly elevated and remained detectable up to 24 h after IR (Fig. 3A)
. Total p53 levels, detected using antibodies PAb122 or CM1, which are insensitive to phosphorylation status, were increased at 24 h after IR but unchanged during the period from 1 to 15 h (data not shown).
|
Chronic or Transient TGF-ß1 Depletion Inhibits p53 Ser-18 Phosphorylation.
Immunoblots of p53 Ser-18P using total protein extracts from wild-type mice showed a massive induction of p53 phosphorylation 1 h after IR (Fig. 4A)
. Ser-18P detection was decreased at least 4-fold in Tgfb1 +/- compared with wild-type mice at both 1 and 6 h, although Ser-18P p53 levels decreased
10-fold between 1 and 6 h in wild-type mice. Total p53 in wild-type and heterozygote mammary extracts measured by CM1 or CM5 were similar (data not shown), suggesting that phosphorylation, rather than abundance, was severely and persistently compromised. The immunolocalization of p53 Ser-18P in irradiated Tgfß1 +/- mammary epithelium was also decreased compared with that of wild-type mice (Fig. 4B)
. Nuclear p53 Ser-18P immunofluorescence was significantly reduced at 1 h after irradiation in the Tgfß1 heterozygote compared with wild-type mammary epithelium. The difference between irradiated wild-type and Tgfß1 +/- mice was less pronounced at 6 h after irradiation but was still attenuated in Tgfß1 +/- mammary epithelial cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TGF-ß is an important tumor suppressor (1 , 3 , 13) . Likewise, the p53 response is an important mechanism of tumor suppression, as is underscored by the high frequency of cancer in Li-Fraumeni syndrome in which p53 malfunctions, by studies in p53 knockout mice, and by the high frequency of mutant p53 found in human tumors and cancer cells (14) . Activation of p53 in damaged cells may induce cell cycle progression delays expressed through either the production of G1-S or G2-M phase transition blocks that provide time for DNA repair (15) . Alternatively, certain cells undergo p53-mediated apoptosis (16) . The factors that influence which response occurs include the type of cell, the level of damage, and cell cycle status (17) .
In response to DNA damage, most studies have focused on intracellular p53 to understand individual cells, whereas tissue processes are coordinated by TGF-ß1. There are similarities between p53 and TGF-ß1 that equip each to participate in damage control. Both are abundant in latent forms that restrict activity until certain protein modifications occur, which includes redox sensitivity (18 , 19) , that endow them with the capability of being rapidly activated. Rapid activation of the p53 stress response is predominantly posttranslational. Covalent protein modifications that affect p53 stability and activity include phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, acetylation, and deacetylation (20) . These modifications can, in turn, affect the binding partners, localization, activity, and degradation of p53. The TGF-ß latent complex is abundant in bound and circulating forms, and its biological activity is controlled by extracellular processing that releases TGF-ß from LAP, which may be further modulated by binding to extracellular proteins. TGF-ß activation acts as the switch to initiate tissue response to damage in physiological processes including inflammation, wounding, and angiogenesis. These common properties enable both p53 and TGF-ß to perform rapidly in response to significant DNA damage.
We have shown that latent TGF-ß1 activation can occur via free radical generation by radiation and other sources, thus endowing TGF-ß1 with the ability to act as an extracellular sensor of oxidative stress (19) . In addition to IR (4) , other DNA-damaging agents induce TGF-ß1 activation, including PALA (21) , cisplatin (22) , and alkylating agents (23) . Studies using keratinocytes from Tgfß1 knockout mice also support a functional, rather than accessory, role for TGF-ß in damage response. PALA-induced gene amplification was elevated >100 times in Tgfß1 null keratinocytes compared with wild-type cells, whereas addition of exogenous TGF-ß1 to knockout cells reversed instability (21) . Similar to our observations in irradiated Tgfß1 -/- embryos, Tgfß1 -/- keratinocytes lack the typical PALA-induced, p53-dependent G1 arrest.
Our data suggest a previously unsuspected action of TGF-ß as an extracellular mediator of intracellular responses to DNA damage. A number of studies have reported that p53 status can affect responses to TGF-ß1 and vice versa (24) . Both are induced by a variety of cytotoxic agents, specifically IR, and both undergo autoregulatory translational and transcriptional control that moderate later events. The rapid induction of Smad 2/3 immunoreactivity that we observed in irradiated mammary tissue and the observation that TGF-ß1 enhances the stress response after UV irradiation (25) suggest that there may be a direct interaction between the TGF-ß signaling and damage response pathways.
Altered responsiveness to TGF-ß1 has been broadly implicated in breast cancer progression (3 , 26) . We and others have argued that conversion to TGF-ß1 growth resistance is a critical juncture in the evolution of malignant behavior (27) , which allows TGF-ß to stimulate tumor progression at later stages of carcinogenesis (13) . We have determined that TGF-ß1 availability affects cellular and p53 responses in irradiated tissues. These data suggest that TGF-ß1 should be considered as a key regulator of genomic integrity. Its early loss, by whatever means, could contribute to genome instability through reduced action of p53.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Funding was provided by NASA program Biomedical Research and Countermeasures Ground Research in Radiation Health, Grant T6275-W (to M. H. B. H.), NIH Grant R01 CA62212 (to C. L. A.), and Department of Defense DAMD17-01-0291 (to M. J. P.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Life Sciences Division, Building 74-174, 1 Cyclotron Road, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720. Phone: (510) 486-6371; Fax: (510) 486-6816; E-mail: MHBarcellos-Hoff{at}lbl.gov ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TGF, transforming growth factor; LAP, latency-associated peptide; IR, ionizing radiation; Ser-18P, p53 serine 18 phosphorylation; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; PALA, N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid. ![]()
Received 7/ 2/02. Accepted 9/ 4/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Maxwell, M. C. Fleisch, S. V. Costes, A. C. Erickson, A. Boissiere, R. Gupta, S. A. Ravani, B. Parvin, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff Targeted and Nontargeted Effects of Ionizing Radiation That Impact Genomic Instability Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8304 - 8311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hauri-Hohl, S. Zuklys, M. P. Keller, L. T. Jeker, T. Barthlott, A. M. Moon, J. Roes, and G. A. Hollander TGF-{beta} signaling in thymic epithelial cells regulates thymic involution and postirradiation reconstitution Blood, August 1, 2008; 112(3): 626 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Andarawewa, A. C. Erickson, W. S. Chou, S. V. Costes, P. Gascard, J. D. Mott, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff Ionizing Radiation Predisposes Nonmalignant Human Mammary Epithelial Cells to Undergo Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8662 - 8670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Wang, A. Narasanna, C. W. Whitell, F. Y. Wu, D. B. Friedman, and C. L. Arteaga Convergence of p53 and Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGFbeta) Signaling on Activating Expression of the Tumor Suppressor Gene maspin in Mammary Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5661 - 5669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kirshner, M. F. Jobling, M. J. Pajares, S. A. Ravani, A. B. Glick, M. J. Lavin, S. Koslov, Y. Shiloh, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Signaling Attenuates Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Activity in Response to Genotoxic Stress Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10861 - 10869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C Fleisch, C. A Maxwell, and M.-H. Barcellos-Hoff The pleiotropic roles of transforming growth factor beta in homeostasis and carcinogenesis of endocrine organs. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 379 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Chen, Y.-C. Chang, Y.-L. Lai, Y.-J. Chen, M.-J. Huang, Y.-S. Leu, Y.-K. Fu, L.-W. Wang, and J.-J. Hwang Change of Plasma Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Levels in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 35(8): 427 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tu, D. J. Jerry, B. Pazik, and S. Smith Schneider Sensitivity to DNA Damage Is a Common Component of Hormone-Based Strategies for Protection of the Mammary Gland Mol. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 3(8): 435 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Elliott and G. C. Blobe Role of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Human Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 2078 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Meineke The role of damage to the cutaneous system in radiation-induced multi-organ failure Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; Supplement_27(1): 95 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M H Barcellos-Hoff How tissues respond to damage at the cellular level: orchestration by transforming growth factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; Supplement_27(1): 123 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chen, W. Zeng, A. Miyazato, E. Billings, J. P. Maciejewski, S. Kajigaya, E. M. Sloand, and N. S. Young Distinctive gene expression profiles of CD34 cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome characterized by specific chromosomal abnormalities Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 4210 - 4218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Izzotti, C. Cartiglia, M. Longobardi, M. Bagnasco, A. Merello, M. You, R. A. Lubet, and S. De Flora Gene Expression in the Lung of p53 Mutant Mice Exposed to Cigarette Smoke Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 64(23): 8566 - 8572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Seidel, B. R. Sparrow, H.L. Kan, W. T. Stott, M. R. Schisler, V.A. Linscombe, and B.B. Gollapudi Profiles of gene expression changes in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate and sodium chloride Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Okazaki, A Sakai, A Ootsuyama, T Sakata, T Nakamura, and T Norimura Trabecular bone mass and bone formation are preserved after limb immobilisation in p53 null mice Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 453 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-G. Chen, C.-P. H. Yang, M. Cammer, and S. Band Horwitz Gene Expression and Mitotic Exit Induced by Microtubule-Stabilizing Drugs Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7891 - 7899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Park, R. L. Henshall-Powell, A. C. Erickson, R. Talhouk, B. Parvin, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff Ionizing radiation induces heritable disruption of epithelial cell interactions PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10728 - 10733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |