Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Debes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.
[Cancer Research 62, 5632-5636, October 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

p300 Mediates Androgen-independent Transactivation of the Androgen Receptor by Interleukin 61

Jose D. Debes, Lucy J. Schmidt, Haojie Huang and Donald J. Tindall2

Departments of Urology [J. D. D., L. J. S., H. H., D. J. T.], Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology [D. J. T.], Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Prostate cancer (PCa) begins as an androgen-dependent tumor that will eventually progress to an androgen-independent stage after androgen ablation. Although little is understood about this transition to androgen independence, the androgen receptor (AR) appears to be involved. The coactivator p300 has been shown to interact with the AR during its androgen-dependent transactivation. We show that p300 is involved downstream of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway during transactivation of the AR by interleukin-6 (IL-6). Furthermore, we demonstrate that sequestration of p300 with E1A inhibits the IL-6-dependent transactivation of the AR, and that increasing amounts of p300 reverse this inhibition. A mutant p300 that lacks histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity did not reverse E1A-mediated inhibition. By using small-interference RNA designed to target p300 transcripts, we demonstrate that, after silencing p300, there was no induction of AR activity by IL-6. These findings reveal a unique role for p300 and its HAT activity, indicating that it is necessary for the ligand-independent transactivation of the AR in androgen-independent PCa cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Initially, most advanced PCa3 is androgen dependent and can be treated effectively with androgen ablation therapy. However, most cases will eventually progress to an androgen-independent stage, at which point there is currently no effective therapy. Thus, progression from androgen dependence to androgen independence is a critical step in PCa development. Recently much attention has been drawn to the AR as a mediator involved in the progression of PCa (1) .

The AR is a member of the steroid nuclear receptor family and is expressed in nearly all PCa tissues, including androgen-refractory tumors and their metastases. The AR directs the assembly and stabilization of the basal transcription apparatus and androgen-dependent cofactors at target gene promoters, thus enhancing transcription (1) .

The coactivator p300 is a functional homologue of the CBP, both of which interact with the AR during its androgen-dependent transactivation (2) . The HAT activity of CBP/p300 is directed toward nucleosomes through interactions with histones. The acetylation of histones weakens their interaction with the DNA, thus facilitating nucleosome displacement and favoring the access of different transcription factors to the DNA template (3) .

One growth factor that has been implicated in androgen-refractory PCa is IL-6. IL-6 is a cytokine that was found initially to be involved in immune and inflammatory responses but now is known to also regulate the growth of many tumor cells. Overexpression of IL-6 has been implicated in the neoplastic transformation of PCa, and IL-6 receptor is expressed in most prostate carcinoma cell lines, including LNCaP (4) . Furthermore, IL-6 has been found to regulate PCa growth and to transactivate AR-dependent gene expression in the absence of androgens (5) . These findings indicate that IL-6 may be involved in the androgen-independent progression of PCa. The pathway by which IL-6 induces AR gene expression remains undefined. Here we show that p300 mediates androgen-independent transactivation of the AR by IL-6 and that the HAT activity of p300 is necessary for this event.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture.
LNCaP cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and maintained in RPMI 1640 (Celox, St. Paul, MN) containing 9% FBS (BioSource International, Rockville, MD).

Transfections and Luciferase Assays.
LNCaP cells (2.8 x 105 in 6-well plates) were plated and, 24 h later, transfected using the Gene Porter Transfection System (Gene Therapy Systems, Inc., San Diego, CA) with plasmids containing full-length p300 (pCI.p300) or its mutant acetyltransferase negative derivative (pCI.p300-HAT), both described previously (6) at quantities described in the figure legends. Plasmid pCMVE1A12S (7) was used at 10 ng/plate. Luciferase reporter (8) containing a PSA promoter (2 32 µg/plate) was used to measure AR transactivation activity in all of the transfections. Twenty-four h posttransfection, cells received fresh medium containing 9% CSS either with or without 50 ng/ml IL-6 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Dual Luciferase assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). Transfection efficiency was monitored by cotransfection with plasmid-containing green fluorescent protein (1 µg/plate; Promega) and visualized with a Zeiss fluorescent microscope at 488 nm. Routinely, transfection efficiencies of 45–50% were obtained.

MAPK Inhibition.
LNCaP cells (2.8 x 105) were plated in 6-well plates and transfected as described previously. Twenty-four h posttransfection, medium was changed to RPMI containing 9% CSS and either vehicle alone (ETOH) or 5 µM MAPK inhibitor PD98059 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). One h later cells received 50 ng/ml IL-6 for 10 min.

Western Blot Analysis.
After transfection, cells were washed once with PBS and lysed in cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA or EGTA], plus Complete Protease Inhibitor (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Western blotting was performed using antibodies to Phospho-p42/44 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204, 9101S;Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Immunodetection of ERK-1/2 (C-16; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used as loading control.

Transfections with siRNA and Immunocytochemistry.
LNCaP cells (1 x 104) were plated on coverslips in 6-well plates in RPMI 1640 containing 9% FBS. After 24 h cells were transfected with 10 µl of 0.2 mM p300 siRNA (5'-AAC CCC UCC UCU UCA GCA CCA-3'; Dharmacon Research, Inc., Lafayette, CO) per well using oligofectamine Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty eight h after transfection, immunocytochemistry was performed using primary antibodies to p300 (C-20) or AR (441; both Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by incubation with fluorescent secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Cells were counterstained with 2 µg/ml bis-benzimide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and images visualized with a LSM510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany).

Transfections with siRNA and IL-6 Stimulation.
LNCaP cells were plated and transfected as described above. Forty-eight h after transfection, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 with 9% CSS either with or without 50 ng/ml IL-6 for 15 h. Immunocytochemistry was performed, this time using primary antibodies against p300 and PSA (A67-B/E3, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Fluorescence was quantitated using the KS400 program image analysis program (Carl Zeiss, Inc.).


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Overexpression of p300 Overcomes the MAPK Pathway Inhibition in IL-6-mediated Transactivation of the AR.
IL-6 has been shown to transactivate the endogenous AR in LNCaP cells. To determine the optimal concentration of IL-6 for AR activation, a dose-response experiment was performed. LNCaP cells were transfected with a Luciferase reporter construct (PSA-LUC) containing an AR-responsive PSA promoter and later treated with increasing amounts of IL-6 resulting in transactivation of the AR in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was mediated in the absence of androgens because we used charcoal-stripped FBS. When cells were treated with the antiandrogen bicalutamide (Casodex) there was no induction of reporter activity by IL-6, which suggested that the increase in activity is attributable to the AR (data not shown). Because the culture medium contains phenol red, it was important to rule out any potential effects of this compound on the experimental results. Therefore, this experiment was repeated with phenol red-free medium. No differences were observed (data not shown).

One proposed mechanism by which IL-6 can activate the AR is through the MAPK pathway (5 , 9) . To determine whether the IL-6 induction of the AR activity involves the MAPK pathway, we used the MAP/ERK kinase (MEK)-1 inhibitor PD98059. Cells transfected with the PSA-LUC reporter were treated with or without PD98059 (Fig. 1ACitation , Lanes 2, 3, and 4) for 1 h. Cells were then treated with 50 ng/ml of IL-6 (Lanes 2, 3, and 4) or vehicle alone (Lane 1). Twelve h later a Dual Luciferase Assay was performed. As shown in Fig. 1ACitation , treatment of cells with PD98059 inhibited the transactivation of the AR by IL-6 (Lane 3), which suggested that the MAPK pathway is involved in the androgen-independent transactivation of AR by IL-6. Previous studies have demonstrated that p300 interacts with the AR and is involved in its androgen-dependent transactivation. Because p300 may be regulated by the MAPK pathway, we decided to assess the role of this cofactor on the IL-6 induced transactivation of the AR by transfecting p300 (1ug) into one group of cells (Lane 4). When cells were transfected with p300, the inhibitory effect of PD98059 was abrogated (Lane 4). To verify the effects of p300 related to the MAPK pathway, phospho-ERK-1/2 and total ERK-1/2 were assayed by Western blot (Fig. 1B)Citation . As expected, phosphorylation of ERK-1 was increased after IL-6 treatment, and this stimulation was abrogated by the MAPK inhibitor. However, phosphorylation of ERK-1 remained low in the presence of IL-6, PD98059, and p300, which suggested that the effects of p300 are downstream of the MAPK pathway. These results suggest that IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR occurs through the MAPK pathway and likely involves p300 as a target.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. IL-6 transactivates the AR through the MAPK pathway, involving p300. In A, LNCaP cells (2.8 x 105 cells/well, in 6-well plate) were transfected with PSA-LUC reporter (2 µg). Twenty-four h later, cells received fresh medium with CSS and were treated with increasing amounts of IL-6 (1 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml) or vehicle alone. Twelve h later, cells were lysed and Dual Luciferase Assay was performed. This figure shows the average of three experiments. In B, LNCaP cells were transfected with PSA-LUC (2 µg) and p300 (1 µg) or empty vector. Twenty-four h after transfection, cells received fresh medium containing CSS. Cells were treated with 5 µM PD98059 or vehicle alone. One h later, cells received IL-6 (50 ng/ml) or vehicle alone. Twelve h later, Dual Luciferase Assay was performed. A second group of cells was transfected as mentioned and treated with PD98059 or vehicle alone. One h later, cells were treated with IL-6 or vehicle alone for 15 min and lysed for Western blot analysis using antibody to phospho-p44/42 MAPK. Total ERK-1/2 was used as loading control. This figure represents the average of three experiments.

 
To determine whether the amount of AR protein or its phosphorylation were affected by IL-6, we performed Western blots of cells transfected with p300 or empty vector and treated with IL-6 or vehicle alone. The amount of AR protein expression remained constant in all of the groups, and no additional bands as might be expected with increased phosphorylation, were observed (Fig. 1B)Citation . Using immunocytochemistry we analyzed the localization of endogenous AR and p300 in the presence or absence of IL-6. As expected, AR and p300 remained colocalizing in the nucleus of cells both before and after IL-6 treatment (data not shown).

Inhibition of p300 and Its HAT Activity Abrogates IL-6-mediated Transactivation of the AR.
Next, we examined the direct role of p300 in the IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR. We used an expression vector E1A12S, to express E1A, an oncoprotein that sequesters p300, thereby inhibiting its HAT activity (10) . As shown in Fig. 2ACitation , IL-6 enhanced the activity of the reporter 5-fold (Lane 2). In contrast, IL-6-mediated transactivation was repressed by cotransfection with E1A (Lane 3). To assess if the repressing action of E1A was specifically due to an interaction with p300, cells were transfected with increasing amounts of p300 expression vector along with E1A and treated with IL-6. As shown in Lanes 4, 5, and 6 in Fig. 2ACitation , overexpression of p300 reversed the repression of E1A in a dose-dependent manner and, at high doses, even enhanced the transactivation of the AR above that achieved with IL-6 alone.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Inhibition of p300 and its HAT activity abrogates IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR. In A, LNCaP cells (2.8 x 105 cells/well, in 6-well plate) were transfected with PSA-LUC reporter (2 µg), E1A12S (10 ng), and increasing amounts of p300 (+, 0.25 µg; ++, 0.5 µg; +++, 1 µg). The total amount of transfected DNA was kept constant by using empty vector pcDNA3.1. Twenty-four h after transfection, cell received fresh medium with CSS containing either 50 ng/ml of IL-6, or empty vector. Cells were lysed 12 h later and Luciferase activity was measured. In B, cells were transfected and treated as described above, but using either 1 µg of p300 (Lane 5) or p300-HAT (Lane 4) as shown in the figure. These graphs represent an average of three experiments.

 
Next, we wanted to determine whether the role of p300 in this model was related to its HAT activity. For these studies, we used two expression constructs: one that contained the wild-type p300 (pCI.p300) and one that contained a mutant p300 that lacks acetyltransferase activity (pCI.p300-HAT, kindly provided by Dr. J. Boyes). As shown before, IL-6 enhanced AR transactivation (Fig. 2BCitation , Lane 2). This activation was repressed by E1A (Lane 3), and that repression was reversed by wild-type p300 (Lane 5). In contrast, cotransfection with the HAT-deficient vector p300-HAT did not reverse the inhibition of the AR activity by E1A (Lane 4). These results indicate that HAT activity is needed in order for p300 to interact with the AR. Importantly, transfection of p300 in the absence of IL-6 did not induce AR activity (data not shown), which suggested that p300 needs to interact with another factor or factors that are induced by IL-6 to induce AR transcriptional activity.

RNA Interference with p300-siRNA Blocks IL-6-dependent Induction of PSA in LNCaP Cells.
To further assess the role of p300 in the IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR, we used p300 siRNA to knock out the expression of p300. siRNAs are synthetic duplex RNAs (~20–25 nucleotides in length) that reconstitute siRNA-protein complexes (siRNPs) and guide specific recognition and targeted cleavage of the mRNA (11) . LNCaP cells were transfected with double-stranded siRNA oligonucleotides specific to p300 (p300-siRNA) and, thus, targeted to disrupt p300 transcripts. Forty-eight h after transfection, cells were immunostained with antibodies to p300 and AR (Fig. 3A)Citation . Cells transfected with p300-siRNA (Fig. 3ACitation , panels 5–7) showed an absence of p300 protein in the cell nuclei (Fig. 3ACitation , panel 7) when compared with control cells (Fig. 3ACitation , panel 3), whereas no change was seen in levels of AR protein or in the appearance of cell nuclei (Fig. 3ACitation , panels 1, 2, 5, and 6). This indicates that the down-regulation of p300 was a result of the decrease in p300 transcripts because of p300-siRNA transfection, and that there was no alteration of AR protein levels or changes in nuclear conformation. As a control, nucleotides containing nonsense sequences were used. In this case there was no alteration of p300 expression as detected by immunocytochemistry (data not shown).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. RNA interference of p300 reduces the increased expression of PSA by IL-6. In A, control LNCaP cells (panels 1–4) or LNCaP cells transfected with p300-siRNA (panels 5–8) were immunostained, 48 h after transfection, with antibodies to p300 (panels 3 and 7) or AR (panels 2 and 6). Panels 1 and 2, nuclear staining with bis-benzimide; panels 4 and 8, AR and p300 signal superimposed. In B, control LNCaP cells or cells transfected with p300-siRNA were treated with IL-6 or vehicle alone 48 h after transfection. Sixteen h later, cells were lysed, and Western blotting was performed using PSA antibody. Total ERK-2 antibody was used as loading control.

 
A known target of the AR gene is PSA. PSA production is dependent directly on AR transactivation activity. Thus, we assessed PSA expression by Western blots of protein extracts isolated from LNCaP cells transfected with p300-siRNA, with or without treatment with IL-6. As shown in Fig. 3BCitation , treatment of cells with IL-6 increased PSA expression, whereas IL-6 had no effect on PSA expression in the cells that were transfected with p300-siRNA, which indicated that p300 is directly involved in the transactivation of the AR by IL-6. Nonetheless, a low level of endogenous PSA was still observed, probably because the transfection efficiency was less than 100%.

We next determined the effect of p300 silencing on PSA expression in individual cells by immunostaining. As shown in Fig. 4Citation , in cells expressing p300 (A2 and B2), PSA expression was enhanced by treatment with IL-6 (B3). After transfection with p300-siRNA (C2 and D2), treatment with IL-6 did not result in an increase in expression of PSA protein (D3). To quantify these results, cells were chosen randomly from three separate experiments, and PSA immunofluorescence was measured. Fig. 4ECitation shows that a generalized block of IL-6-mediated PSA induction was evident after p300 RNA interference. These results confirm that p300 plays a direct role in IL-6 transactivation of the AR.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. RNA interference of p300 blocks IL-6-mediated induction of PSA. In A, control LNCaP cells (A and B, panels 1–4) or cells transfected with p300-siRNA (C and D, panels 1–4) were treated with IL-6 (B and D) or vehicle alone (A and C). Sixteen h later, cells were immunostained with antibodies against p300 (red) and PSA (green). A1–D1, nuclear staining with bis-benzimide; A–D, 2–3, p300 and PSA, respectively; A4–D4, the signal for both proteins superimposed. The figure is a representative of three different experiments. In E, cells were randomly chosen from the previous experiments and mean fluorescence intensity of PSA expression was measured in each of them; *, P = 0.039; bar graph, a general average of all of the chosen cells.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The role of p300 in the androgen-dependent transactivation of the AR has been described previously (2) . In the present work, we have demonstrated that p300 is also involved in the androgen-independent transactivation of the AR. Furthermore, we demonstrated that p300 plays a major role, because its inactivation by E1A is a limiting factor in IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR. It is known that E1A also binds to other proteins that could interact with the AR (12) . That possibility was ruled out by using p300 siRNA. We showed that the silencing of p300 blocked the IL-6-dependent transactivation of the AR without altering the AR per se. To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate that p300 can mediate the transactivation of the AR by an androgen-independent mechanism.

Several studies have suggested that p300, through its HAT activity, alters the positive charge of histones, thus destabilizing the nucleosomes and leaving the DNA-template susceptible to regulation by different transcription factors. Many studies have demonstrated that acetylation plays a major role in transactivation of different receptors (3 , 13) . We showed that a p300 mutant that lacked HAT activity failed to reverse the E1A-inhibition of the AR activity, which indicated that the HAT activity of p300 is necessary to interact with the AR in an IL-6-mediated mechanism.

A very recent publication has shown that the MAPK pathway is required for the activation of the AR by IL-6 (9) . In this study, we confirmed that the inhibition of the MAPK pathway limited IL-6-mediated transactivation of the AR. Furthermore, we showed that p300 could reverse this action, which suggests that IL-6 may directly or indirectly, through the MAPK pathway, induce p300 transcriptional activity. The fact that p300 alone did not induce AR transcriptional activity suggests that other mechanisms dependent on IL-6 are involved. In this regard, it must be taken into account that p300 is a cofactor. Thus, p300 is necessary, but not sufficient, to induce transcription under these conditions.

A recent study suggested that IL-6 increases AR expression (14) . That was not the case in our experiments, because we determined by both Western blot and immunostaining that AR protein levels did not change as a result of treatment with IL-6 or transfection with p300 under these experimental conditions. Furthermore, we found no evidence that the AR was being phosphorylated by p300 during treatment with IL-6. Both positive and negative effects of IL-6 on the proliferation of LNCaP cells have been observed (15) . Under our experimental conditions, IL-6 increased cell growth proliferation 50% after 24 h (data not shown). Thus, these results correlate the positive effect of IL-6 on AR transactivation activity with cell proliferation.

This study does not preclude the possibility that other histone acetylators may also regulate AR transcriptional activity (2) . This could be the case with CBP, which is known to be a histone acetylator. Moreover, CBP has been shown to interact with the AR. Additional possibilities include other nonhistone proteins like p53 (16) , erythroid Kruppel-like factor (17) , and GATA-1 (6) . However, these proteins have not been shown to be regulated by IL-6.

Taken together, our data provide evidence of a mechanism for transactivation of the AR by IL-6 through p300 and its histone acetylation properties. We think that p300 could be a crucial factor in the transactivation of the AR by growth factors in the absence of androgens. These studies may lead to a better understanding of the biology of androgen-independent PCa.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the following for their valuable contributions: James Tarara for assistance with confocal microscopy; Kenneth Peters for the preparation of figures; Drs. Manuel Llano, Martin Fernandez-Zapico, and Charles Young for critical reviews of the manuscript; Dr. Horacio Murillo for helpful discussions; Drs. Robert Kelm (Mayo Clinic/Foundation, Rochester, MN; E1A12S), Charles Young (Mayo Clinic/Foundation, Rochester, MN; PSA-LUC), and Joan Boyes (Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; p300 and p300-HAT) for providing plasmids.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grants CA91956 and DK60920, the T. J. Martell Foundation, and the Yamanouchi USA Foundation. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Departments of Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-8139; Fax: (507) 284-2384; E-mail: tindall.donald{at}mayo.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PCa, prostate cancer; IL-6, interleukin 6; AR, androgen receptor; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; siRNA, small-interference RNA; CBP, cAMP-response element-binding protein; FBS, fetal bovine serum; CSS, charcoal-stripped serum; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase. Back

Received 5/16/02. Accepted 8/28/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Grossmann M., Huang H., Tindall D. Androgen receptor signaling in androgen-refractory prostate cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 93: 1687-1697, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fu M., Wang C., Reutens A., Wang J., Angeletti R., Siconolfi-Baez L., Ogryzko V., Avantaggiati M., Pestell R. p300 and p300/cAMP-response element-binding protein-associated factor acetylate the androgen receptor at sites governing hormone-dependent transactivation. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 20853-20860, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Vo N., Goodman R. CREB-binding protein and p300 in transcriptional regulation. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 13505-13508, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  4. Chen T., Wang L., Farrar W. Interleukin 6 activates androgen receptor-mediated gene expression through a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-dependent pathway in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res., 60: 2132-2135, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hobisch A, Eder I, Putz T, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Klocker H, Culig Z. Interleukin-6 regulates prostate-specific Protein expression in prostate carcinoma cells by activation of the androgen receptor. Cancer Res., 58: 4640-4645, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Boyes J., Byfield P., Nakatani Y., Ogryzko V. Regulation of activity of the transcription factor GATA-1 by acetylation. Nature (Lond.), 396: 594-598, 1998.[Medline]
  7. Liu S., Rand A., Kelm R., Getz M. The retinoblastoma gene family members pRB and p107 coactivate the AP-1-dependent mouse tissue factor promoter in fibroblasts. Oncogene, 19: 3352-3362, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Zhu W., Smith A., Young C. A nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, flufenamic acid, inhibits the expression of the androgen receptor in LNCaP cells. Endocrinology, 140: 5451-5454, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ueda T., Bruchovsky N, Sadar M. Activation of the androgen receptor N-terminal domain by interleukin-6 via MAPK and STAT3 signal transduction pathways. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 7076-7085, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chakravarti D., LaMorte V., Nelson M., Nakajima T., Schulman I., Juguilon H., Montminy M., Evans R. Role of CBP/p300 in nuclear receptor signaling. Nature (Lond.), 383: 99-102, 1996.[Medline]
  11. Elbashir S., Harborth J., Lendeckel W., Yalcin A., Tuschl T. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature (Lond.), 411: 494-498, 2001.[Medline]
  12. Ait-Si-Ali S., Ramirez S., Barre F., Dkhissi F., Magnaghi-Jaulin L., Girault J., Robin P., Knibiehler M., Pritchard L., Ducommun B., Trouche D., Harel-Bellan A. Histone acetyltransferase activity of CBP is controlled by cycle-dependent kinases and oncoprotein E1A. Nature (Lond.), 396: 184-186, 1998.[Medline]
  13. Espinosa J., Emerson B. Transcriptional regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/chromatin binding and site-directed cofactor recruitment. Mol. Cell, 8: 57-59, 2001.[Medline]
  14. Lin D., Whitney M., Yao Z., Keller E. Interleukin-6 induces androgen responsiveness in prostate cancer cells through up-regulation of androgen receptor expression. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 1773-1781, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Smith P., Hobisch A., Lin D., Culig Z., Keller E. Interleukin-6 and prostate cancer progression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 12: 33-40, 2001.[Medline]
  16. Sakaguchi K., Herrera J., Saito S., Miki T., Bustin M., Vassilev A., Anderson C., Apella E. DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade. Genes Dev., 12: 2831-2871, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhang W., Bieker J. Acetylation and modulation of erythroid Kruppel-like factor (EKLF) activity by interaction with histone acetyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 9855-9860, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
N. K. Mukhopadhyay, B. Cinar, L. Mukhopadhyay, M. Lutchman, A. S. Ferdinand, J. Kim, L. W. K. Chung, R. M. Adam, S. K. Ray, A. B. Leiter, et al.
The Zinc Finger Protein Ras-Responsive Element Binding Protein-1 Is a Coregulator of the Androgen Receptor: Implications for the Role of the Ras Pathway in Enhancing Androgenic Signaling in Prostate Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2056 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C.-C. Yang, Y.-C. Wang, S. Wei, L.-F. Lin, C.-S. Chen, C.-C. Lee, C.-C. Lin, and C.-S. Chen
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Independent Suppression of Androgen Receptor Expression by Troglitazone Mechanism and Pharmacologic Exploitation
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3229 - 3238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. V. Heemers, T. J. Sebo, J. D. Debes, K. M. Regan, K. A. Raclaw, L. M. Murphy, A. Hobisch, Z. Culig, and D. J. Tindall
Androgen Deprivation Increases p300 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3422 - 3430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
R. Jasavala, H. Martinez, J. Thumar, A. Andaya, A.-C. Gingras, J. K. Eng, R. Aebersold, D. K. Han, and M. E. Wright
Identification of Putative Androgen Receptor Interaction Protein Modules: Cytoskeleton and Endosomes Modulate Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 252 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
I. Bellezza, H. Neuwirt, C. Nemes, I. T. Cavarretta, M. Puhr, H. Steiner, A. Minelli, G. Bartsch, F. Offner, A. Hobisch, et al.
Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-3 Antagonizes cAMP Effects on Proliferation and Apoptosis and Is Expressed in Human Prostate Cancer
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 169(6): 2199 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
P Singh, A Uzgare, I Litvinov, S R Denmeade, and J T Isaacs
Combinatorial androgen receptor targeted therapy for prostate cancer.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 653 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. R. Logan, L. Gaughan, S. R. C. McCracken, V. Sapountzi, H. Y. Leung, and C. N. Robson
Human PIRH2 Enhances Androgen Receptor Signaling through Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 1 and Is Overexpressed in Prostate Cancer.
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6502 - 6510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Hoffmann, T. Barz, and D. Spengler
Multitasking C2H2 Zinc Fingers Link Zac DNA Binding to Coordinated Regulation of p300-Histone Acetyltransferase Activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(14): 5544 - 5557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Wallner, J. Dai, J. Escara-Wilke, J. Zhang, Z. Yao, Y. Lu, M. Trikha, J. A. Nemeth, M. H. Zaki, and E. T. Keller
Inhibition of Interleukin-6 with CNTO328, an Anti-Interleukin-6 Monoclonal Antibody, Inhibits Conversion of Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer to an Androgen-Independent Phenotype in Orchiectomized Mice.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3087 - 3095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. D. Debes, B. Comuzzi, L. J. Schmidt, S. M. Dehm, Z. Culig, and D. J. Tindall
p300 Regulates Androgen Receptor-Independent Expression of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Cells Treated Chronically with Interleukin-6
Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5965 - 5973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
Z Culig, H Steiner, G Bartsch, and A Hobisch
Mechanisms of endocrine therapy-responsive and -unresponsive prostate tumours
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 229 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D.E. Clark, T.M. Errington, J.A. Smith, H.F. Frierson Jr., M.J. Weber, and D.A. Lannigan
The Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase, p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase, Is an Important Regulator of Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation
Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3108 - 3116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
J Kim, L Jia, M R Stallcup, and G A Coetzee
The role of protein kinase A pathway and cAMP responsive element-binding protein in androgen receptor-mediated transcription at the prostate-specific antigen locus
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. D. Debes, T. J. Sebo, H. V. Heemers, B. R. Kipp, D. A. L. Haugen, C. M. Lohse, and D. J. Tindall
p300 Modulates Nuclear Morphology in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 708 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
L. Pan, Y. Wang, C. A. Jones, S. T. Glenn, H. Baumann, and K. W. Gross
Enhancer-dependent inhibition of mouse renin transcription by inflammatory cytokines
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): F117 - F124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang
Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 276 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Jia, C. S-Y. Choong, C. Ricciardelli, J. Kim, W. D. Tilley, and G. A Coetzee
Androgen Receptor Signaling: Mechanism of Interleukin-6 Inhibition
Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2619 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Rahman, H. Miyamoto, and C. Chang
Androgen Receptor Coregulators in Prostate Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2208 - 2219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
K. M. Sakamoto, K. B. Kim, R. Verma, A. Ransick, B. Stein, C. M. Crews, and R. J. Deshaies
Development of Protacs to Target Cancer-promoting Proteins for Ubiquitination and Degradation
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2003; 2(12): 1350 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. D. Debes, T. J. Sebo, C. M. Lohse, L. M. Murphy, D. A. L. Haugen, and D. J. Tindall
p300 in Prostate Cancer Proliferation and Progression
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7638 - 7640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. E. Bakin, D. Gioeli, R. A. Sikes, E. A. Bissonette, and M. J. Weber
Constitutive Activation of the Ras/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway Promotes Androgen Hypersensitivity in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., April 15, 2003; 63(8): 1981 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
L. Jia, J. Kim, H. Shen, P. E. Clark, W. D. Tilley, and G. A. Coetzee
Androgen Receptor Activity at the Prostate Specific Antigen Locus: Steroidal and Non-Steroidal Mechanisms
Mol. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 1(5): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Debes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online