Cancer Research Audrey Hepburn  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wakabayashi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wakabayashi, T.
[Cancer Research 62, 6116-6123, November 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Sulfonamide Derivative, E7820, Is a Unique Angiogenesis Inhibitor Suppressing an Expression of Integrin {alpha}2 Subunit on Endothelium

Yasuhiro Funahashi1, Naoko Hata Sugi1, Taro Semba, Yuji Yamamoto, Shinichi Hamaoka, Naoko Tsukahara-Tamai, Yoichi Ozawa, Akihiko Tsuruoka, Kazumasa Nara, Keiko Takahashi, Tadashi Okabe, Junichi Kamata, Takashi Owa, Norihiro Ueda, Toru Haneda, Masahiro Yonaga, Kentaro Yoshimatsu and Toshiaki Wakabayashi2

Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan 300-2635


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the process of angiogenesis, endothelial adhesion molecules play a significant role in vascular morphogenesis, in coordination with angiogenic factor signaling. Here we report that a novel angiogenesis inhibitor, E7820 (an aromatic sulfonamide derivative), inhibited in vitro proliferation and tube formation of human umbilical vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC). E7820 decreased integrin {alpha}2, 3, 5, and ß1 in confluent culture of HUVEC, and integrin {alpha}2 was initially suppressed in mRNA level, followed by decrement of integrins {alpha}3, 5, and ß1. The inhibition of integrin {alpha}2 expression in HUVEC showed dose dependence but did not alter the level of CD31. Up-regulation of integrin {alpha}2 by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate abrogated the inhibitory effect of E7820 on tube formation within type I collagen gel, whereas addition of antibody against integrin {alpha}2 canceled the phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate effect. These results suggest that E7820 inhibited tube formation through the suppression of integrin {alpha}2. Oral administration of E7820 remarkably resulted in inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis in mouse dorsal air sac model, and tumor growth of human colorectal tumor cell lines (WiDr and LoVo) was inhibited in xenotransplanted model in mice. This is the first time that a small molecule has been shown to modulate integrins, and this finding may provide the basis for a new approach to antiangiogenic therapy through the suppression of integrin {alpha}2 on endothelium.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Angiogenesis, i.e., the formation of new blood vessels, is necessary for tumor growth beyond 1–2 mm in diameter (1) . The process involves complex orchestration of many processes, some overlapping, such as degradation of ECM, sprouting, migration, proliferation, TF, and maturation of endothelial cells. Two types of angiogenic factors regulate the angiogenesis process. One type consists of endothelium-specific growth factors, such as VEGF3 (2) and angiopoietins (3) . The other consists of pleiotropic growth factors, such as FGFs (4) and hepatocyte growth factor (5) . In addition to these factors, adhesion molecules such as CD31 (6) , vascular endothelial-cadherin (7) , Delta/Notch (Ref. 8 ; in cell-cell interaction), and integrins (Ref. 9 ; in cell-ECM interaction) are also important. Studies using blocking antibodies and null mutation in ES cells and mice have demonstrated that endothelial integrins play an important role in the process of blood vessel formation (10 , 11) . Some angiogenesis inhibitors related to integrin have been entered into clinical trails for cancer patients. An antagonist and a humanized antibody to integrin {alpha}vß3 induced endothelial cell apoptosis of newly formed vessels (12) . Angiostatin, a fragment of plasminogen, and endostatin, a COOH-terminal fragment of collagen XVIII, showed antitumor activity in preclinical studies (13 , 14) . In particular, endostatin caused tumor regression without inducing drug resistance in mouse models (15) . These two inhibitors appear to act on integrin {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}5, respectively (16 , 17) , although their action mechanisms remain unclear, and they are currently under clinical study.

Aromatic sulfonamide derivatives exhibit a range of bioactivities, including antimicrobial (18) , antidiabetic (19) , anti-inflammatory (20) , and anticancer (21 , 22 , 23) . We speculated that a novel angiogenesis inhibitor might be found among sulfonamide derivatives and used a TF model for screening assay. The results led to the discovery of a novel antiangiogenic sulfonamide derivative, E7820, which modulates the expression of integrin {alpha}2, 3, 5, and ß1 on HUVEC. In the present study, we examined the action of E7820 on integrin subunits in a TF model and found that suppression of integrin {alpha}2 by E7820 played a crucial role in inhibition of endothelium TF. Moreover, E7820 was confirmed to show inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis and tumor growth in a xenotransplanted model in mice.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Synthesis of E7820 and Other Chemicals.
The chemical name of E7820 is N-(3-Cyano-4-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl)-3-cyanobenzene-sulfonamide (CAS Registry Number 289483-69-8), and the structural formula is shown in Fig. 1aCitation . The chemical identity of E7820 was supported by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. The chemical identity of TNP-470, SU5416, and marimastat was supported by nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectroscopy data.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Inhibitory activity of E7820 in the sandwich TF model. HUVEC were seeded on the first collagen gel with SFM supplemented with angiogenic factor. Then, HUVEC were overlaid with the second gel and cultured with SFM in the presence of inhibitors. After 4 days, HUVEC were stained with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and examined by video processing under a microscope. a, chemical structure of E7820. b, bFGF-driven TF: E7820; 0.7 µg/ml, TNP-470; 2.5 µg/ml, marimastat; 10 µg/ml. c, VEGF-driven TF: E7820; 2.0 µg/ml, SU-5416; 1.0 µg/ml. d, dose dependency of inhibitory activity of E7820 in bFGF- and VEGF-driven TF. Data are expressed as means (n = 2) and confirmed by repeated experiments.

 
Cells.
WI-38 cells and WiDr cells from Dainippon Seiyaku (Osaka, Japan), and Lovo cells from American Type Culture Collection were maintained in RPMI 1640 containing 10% heat-inactive FBS, penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 µM), and sodium pyruvate (1 mM). HUVEC were isolated from human umbilical vein by the method described previously (24) .

Monoclonal Antibody.
P1B5 (human {alpha}3), JB1a (human ß1), LM609 (human {alpha}Vß3), and P1F6 (human {alpha}Vß5) were purchased from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA). 5E8D9 (human {alpha}1 subunit) and A2-IIE10 (human {alpha}2 subunit) were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). SG/73 (human {alpha}4 subunit) and KH/33 (human {alpha}5 subunit) were purchased from Seikagaku Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). JC/70A (human CD31) and FITC-conjugated F(ab)2 fragment of rabbit antimouse immunoglobulins were purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). K20 (human ß1 subunit) was purchased from Immunotech (Marseilles, France). 4F10 (human {alpha}6 subunit) was purchased from Serotec (Sapporo, Japan). Rat monoclonal antimouse CD31 antibody (clone MEC13.3) was purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA).

Sandwich TF Assay.
Four-hundred µl aliquots of collagen gel were added to 24-well plates and allowed to gel for at least 1 h at 37°C. After gelation, HUVEC were plated on the gel at a concentration of 1–1.2 x 105 cells in SFM (Human endothelial-SFM Basal Growth Medium; Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) with epidermal growth factor (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 10 ng/ml and either bFGF (Life Technologies, Inc.) or VEGF (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) at 20 ng/ml. After culture at 37°C overnight, HUVEC were covered with 400 µl of similar collagen gel and left for at least 3 h at 37°C. SFM (1.5 ml) supplemented with epidermal growth factor and either bFGF or VEGF was added after gelation, with or without inhibitors. In the case of addition of antibody, 96-well plates and one-fourth amounts of reagents and cells were used. Tube length of capillaries was quantified by tracing the center of each formed tube and calculating the pixel intensity of the outlined image using Mac SCOPE 2.56 (Mitani Corporation, Chiba, Japan). All of the experiments were done at least in duplicate and repeated three times.

Cell Growth Assay.
HUVEC were grown in EGM kit (Sanko Junyaku, Tokyo, Japan) containing 2% FBS and plated at 800 cells/well onto 96-well plates in 0.1 ml of EGM kit containing 10% FBS. After 24 h, inhibitors or vehicle were added to duplicate cultures of cells and at 3 days after addition of inhibitors, the ratios of surviving cells were measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. The serum-free assays were carried out at 20,000 cells/well onto 24-well plates in 1 ml of human endothelial-SFM basal growth medium containing bFGF (20 ng/ml) or VEGF (20 ng/ml). All of the experiments were done at least in duplicate and repeated three times.

Analysis by Flow Cytometry.
Cells were harvested and suspended at 2–5 x 105 cells in 100 µl of PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.05% NaN3, then incubated with 1 µg of primary antibodies for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS, then incubated in 100 µl of FITC-conjugated secondary antibody diluted 1:50 in PBS for 30 min at 4°C, washed with PBS three times and fixed with CellFix (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The control sample (for background) was incubated in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.05% NaN3 without primary antibody. Fluorescence signals from 2 x 104 cells were acquired using a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) to quantify staining intensity. The expression of each molecule was calculated using the mean fluorescence of each sample as determined by flow cytometry: relative expression (relative mean fluorescence intensity) = mean fluorescence intensity of sample/mean fluorescence intensity of background.

Mouse DAS Model.
The mouse DAS method was performed according to Sakamoto et al. (25) with a minor modification (26) . Briefly, a suspension of 1.5 x 107 cells in collagen gel was injected into a Millipore chamber consisting of a Millipore filter ring (PR0001401) and two Durapore filters (HVLP04700, 0.45 µm), which were attached to the ring with MF cement (XX7000000). This chamber was implanted into a DAS produced in C57BL/6 mice by injecting 10 ml of air through a 25-gauge needle.

Xenograft Model.
Six-week-old female nude mice (KSN mice) underwent s.c. transplantation of human tumors. Administration was started (day 1) at 3 days (WiDr cells) or 7 days (Lovo cells) after transplantation. E7820 was p.o. administered on a schedule of twice daily every day. The tumor volumes were followed during the experiment by direct measurement of the diameter of tumors with calipers, according to the formula: tumor volume = (a x b x b)/2, where a is the largest diameter and b is the diameter perpendicular to a. {Delta}T/C (% of control for {Delta}growth) were calculated from the formula; ({Delta}T/{Delta}C) x 100. {Delta}T and {Delta}C are changes in tumor volume ({Delta}growth) for each treated and vehicle control group. In the case of reduction of tumor volume, {Delta}T/C values were calculated following formula: {Delta}T/C (%) = (TVn - TV1)/TV1 x 100, where TVn is the tumor volume of treated mice on day n.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biological Activities of E7820.
The sandwich TF model in type I collagen gel consists of HUVEC alone and represents a single stage in the process of TF. The initial cobblestone structure of HUVEC on the first collagen gel changes to a network structure with lumina when the cells are overlaid with a second collagen gel. E7820 (Fig. 1a)Citation inhibited both bFGF- and VEGF-driven TF of HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1, b–d)Citation . The capillary network was broken up and changed to small islands. TNP-470, an inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation (27) , did not inhibit TF at 2.5 µg/ml (Fig. 1b)Citation , and SU-5416, an inhibitor of VEGF receptor kinase (28) , inhibited only VEGF-driven TF (Fig. 1cCitation ; Table 1Citation ). Marimastat, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (29) , induced a slight morphological change of the capillary-tube network, but the tube number was not decreased (Fig. 1b)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Antiangiogenic activity of E7820, TNP-470, SU-5416, and marimastat in vitro

 
Proliferation of HUVEC induced by either bFGF or VEGF in SFM was also inhibited by E7820 treatment (Table 1)Citation . The IC50 values were 0.10 and 0.081 µg/ml, respectively. E7820 showed similar inhibition of proliferation stimulated by bovine brain extract in medium containing 10% FBS. TNP-470 potently inhibited proliferation of HUVEC stimulated by bovine brain extract in medium containing 10% FBS, and SU-5416 inhibited proliferation of HUVEC stimulated by VEGF in SFM. Marimastat did not inhibit proliferation of HUVEC. However, all of the inhibitors (E7820, TNP-470, SU-5416, and marimastat) showed potent inhibitory activity in a rat aortic angiogenic model (30) , which involves several angiogenic processes such as degradation of ECM, migration, proliferation, and TF. The activity profile shown in Table 1Citation indicates that E7820 has a unique character compared with the other angiogenesis inhibitors.

Effect of E7820 on Expression Levels of Integrin Subunits on Endothelium.
In the TF model, E7820 inhibited TF after the second collagen gel had been overlaid, whereas E7820 did not decrease the number of HUVEC on the first collagen gel at confluence (data not shown), suggesting that E7820 inhibits the TF process. Because cell-cell and/or cell-ECM adhesion molecules play an important role in the TF process, we firstly studied adhesion molecules on HUVEC to clarify the action mechanism of E7820. Flow cytometry analysis of HUVEC revealed that integrin subunits {alpha}2, 5, 6, and ß1 were highly expressed on the cell surface, but integrin {alpha}1 and 4 were not. The expression levels of integrin {alpha}2, 5, and 6 subunits were significantly down-regulated in confluent culture compared with subconfluent culture (Fig. 2a)Citation .



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Inhibition of expression of integrin subunits by E7820. Flow cytometric analysis of expression levels of integrin subunits on HUVEC cell surface. a, expression patterns of integrin subunits on HUVEC in either subconfluent ({blacksquare}) or confluent culture ({square}). b and c, alteration of expression levels of integrin subunits on HUVEC with E7820 treatment for 48 h at 50 ng/ml in subconfluent and confluent culture, respectively. Expression level is presented as the relative value to nontreatment with E7820. Data are expressed as means of three to five experiments; bars, ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 
E7820 treatment at 0.05 µg/ml for 48 h altered the pattern of integrin expression on the cell surface of HUVEC under both subconfluent and confluent culture conditions. The expression level of integrin {alpha}2 was significantly decreased to ~50% of the control under both culture conditions (Fig. 2, b and c)Citation . Integrins {alpha}3 and 5 were also decreased, although to lesser extents than {alpha}2 subunit. The expression level of {alpha}6 subunit was significantly down-regulated to 60% of the control in subconfluent culture, but it remained at 90% of the control in confluent culture. E7820 treatment did not alter the expression of {alpha}v integrin or CD31 under these culture conditions. TNP-470 at 0.05 µg/ml did not affect the pattern of integrin expression under the confluent culture condition (data not shown).

To investigate the decrease of integrins {alpha}2, 3, 5, and ß1 in more detail, we analyzed the alteration of the mRNAs by a quantitative PCR method. After 12 h treatment of HUVEC with E7820 (0.05 µg/ml), integrin {alpha}2 mRNA was significantly decreased, whereas other integrin subunits including CD31 and VE-cadherin were not altered (Fig. 3a)Citation . E7820 suppressed integrin {alpha}2 mRNA after 6 h of treatment, indicating that E7820 acts initially on integrin {alpha}2 followed by integrins {alpha}3, 5, and ß1 (Fig. 3b)Citation . The inhibition of integrin {alpha}2 expression in HUVEC showed dose dependence, but E7820 did not alter the level of CD31 even at the concentration of 0.5 µg/ml (Fig. 4)Citation . Furthermore, because the activity of E7820 toward integrin {alpha}2 was not observed in a human fibroblast cell line (WI-38; data not shown), the inhibitory action of E7820 might be selective to certain cell types.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Inhibition of expression of integrin subunits by E7820. Taqman reverse transcription-PCR analysis of integrin subunit mRNAs. a, alteration of integrin subunit mRNAs on HUVEC on E7820 treatment for 12 h at 50 ng/ml in confluent culture. Amounts of mRNA are represented by relative values to GAP3DH mRNA. b, time course of integrin {alpha}2 mRNA after E7820 treatment at 50 ng/ml. Data are expressed as means of three experiments; bars, ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Dose-activity relationship of E7820 for down-regulation of integrin {alpha}2 subunits on HUVEC. Alteration of expression levels of integrin subunits on HUVEC with E7820 treatment for 48 h at 50 ng/ml in confluent culture; integrin {alpha}2 ({square}) and CD31 ({blacksquare}). Expression level is presented as the relative value to nontreatment with E7820. Data are expressed as means of four to seven experiments; bars, ± SD. **, P < 0.01.

 
Role of Integrin {alpha}2 in the TF Model and Effect of E7820.
To understand the role of integrin subunits in the TF model, we evaluated the effects of antibodies against integrin subunits. Anti-integrin {alpha}2 antibody inhibited bFGF-driven TF of HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5, a–c and e)Citation , but anti-{alpha}5 antibody had no effect at the concentration of 20 µg/ml (Fig. 5d)Citation . Because the anti-{alpha}2 antibody did not induce any change of HUVEC at confluent monolayer on the first collagen gel without overlaying the second gel, integrin {alpha}2 appears to play an important role in the TF process. Anti-integrin ß1 (a counterpart of integrin {alpha}2) antibody also inhibited TF of HUVEC. Similar results were obtained with anti-{alpha}2 and -ß1 antibodies in VEGF-driven TF (data not shown).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Inhibitory activity of anti-integrin {alpha}2 antibody in bFGF-driven TF model. a, without antibody. b, A2-IIE10 (human {alpha}2 subunit); 2.5 µg/ml. c, 20 µg/ml. d, P1D6 (human {alpha}5 subunit); 20 µg/ml. e, dose dependency of inhibitory activity through integrin {alpha}2 antibody ({blacksquare}). {square}, integrin {alpha}5 antibody.

 
It is reported that the expression of integrin {alpha}2 subunit is up-regulated through the activation of protein kinase C by PMA in some epithelial cells (31) . The expression level of integrin {alpha}2 subunit on HUVEC was remarkably increased by treatment with 2 nM PMA for 24 h. However, integrin {alpha}3 and CD31 showed no change, although expression of integrin {alpha}5 was slightly stimulated (Fig. 6a)Citation . We next investigated whether PMA affected the decrease of integrin {alpha}2 expression on HUVEC by E7820. When HUVEC was treated with E7820 at 0.5 µg/ml, the expression level of integrin {alpha}2 was decreased. However, in the presence of 2 nM PMA, the expression level of integrin {alpha}2 recovered to the control level (Fig. 6b)Citation . The inhibitory activity of E7820 in the VEGF-driven TF model was also reduced by PMA in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6c)Citation . Inhibitory activity was recovered by addition of antibody against integrin {alpha}2, indicating that the reversing effect of PMA on the inhibition by E7820 is indeed because of stimulation of integrin {alpha}2 expression (Fig. 6d)Citation . A similar effect of PMA on E7820-treated HUVEC was also observed in bFGF-driven TF (data not shown).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of PMA on the inhibitory activity of E7820. Flow cytometric analysis of alteration of expression levels of integrin subunits on HUVEC by PMA treatment (a and b). Effect of PMA treatment on the inhibitory activity of E7820 in VEGF-driven TF of HUVEC (c and d). a, expression pattern of integrin subunits on HUVEC without ({square}) or with PMA ({blacksquare}) for 24 h. b, recovery of an expression of {alpha}2 integrin by PMA on E7820-treated HUVEC for 24 h; solid trace, vehicle; broken trace, 0.5 µg/ml E7820; dotted trace, 0.5 µg/ml E7820 and 2 nM PMA. c, overcoming the inhibitory efficacy of E7820 with ({bullet}): 0, ({circ}): 0.06, ({blacktriangleup}):0.2, ({triangleup}):0.6, ({diamondsuit}): 2.0 nM PMA. d, integrin {alpha}2 dependency of PMA efficacy against E7820. E7820: 0.5 µg/ml, PMA: 2 nM, mAb (A2-IIE10, antihuman integrin {alpha}2 antibody): 20 µg/ml.

 
Antiangiogenic and Antitumor Efficacy of E7820 in Mice.
In the DAS model, angiogenesis is s.c. induced by angiogenic factors such as FGF, VEGF, and others, which are secreted from tumor cells packed in Millipore chambers (26) . Human colorectal tumor, WiDr cells, clearly induced angiogenesis in the mouse skin over the chamber. Oral administration of E7820, once daily for 4 days, at the doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg, potently inhibited WiDr-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 7a)Citation . Immunohistochemical analysis showed that newly formed vessels appeared beneath the muscle layer in the skin, whereas such a vessel-enriched layer was not found in mice given 400 mg/kg E7820 (Fig. 7b)Citation . Because WiDr cells are extremely less sensitive toward E7820 in cell growth assay (see below), the effect in DAS model strongly suggests an antiangiogenic potency of E7820. Moreover, E7820 (oral administration twice daily for 14 days) significantly delayed the growth of WiDr cells inoculated s.c. The antitumor effect was dose-dependent at 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, and the tumor growth rates after the beginning of E7820 treatment ({Delta}T/C value) were 52%, 46%, and 27%, respectively (Fig. 8a)Citation . E7820 also completely suppressed the growth of human colorectal tumor, LoVo cells, on the same administration schedule for 21 days at the doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg (Fig. 8b)Citation . Antiproliferative activity of E7820 in vitro against both WiDr and LoVo cells was very weak compared with that against HUVEC. The values of IC50 were 29 and 15 µg/ml, respectively, suggesting that the antitumor effects of E7820 resulted from antiangiogenic activity.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of E7820 in human colorectal tumor WiDr-induced in vivo angiogenesis using DAS assay. Vehicle and E7820 were administered by gavage once daily for 4 days after implanting chambers including tumor cells. c.c. regions attached to chambers were exposed. a, photograph on day 5. b, immunohistochemical analysis of the effect of E7820 on the newly formed layer of vasculature. Skins attached to chambers were removed in the same manner as in a. Then, the skins were embedded in OCT compound, frozen in dry ice-acetone, and stained with a rat monoclonal antimouse CD31 antibody (clone MEC13.3). A positive reaction was indicated by a reddish brown precipitate. Data shown is one representative of each group (n = 4), and confirmed by repeated experiments.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. Effect of E7820 on the growth of s.c. inoculated tumor in xenografts model. a, response of WiDr tumors to treatment with E7820. Vehicle and E7820 were administered by gavage twice daily for 14 days from 2 days after inoculation of the tumor cells, and the tumor volume was measured on day 17. b, growth inhibition of LoVo tumors by E7820 treatment. Administration of E7820 was started when the tumor volume reached 100 mm3 by gavage twice daily for 21 days. ({bullet}):vehicle, ({square}): 50 mg/kg, ({triangleup}):100 mg/kg, ({circ}):200 mg/kg. Data shown are means; bars, ± SD (n = 6).

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Present studies support E7820 as a unique and potent angiogenesis inhibitor. E7820 inhibited proliferation and TF in endothelial cells, and we confirmed action mechanism of E7820 in the TF model. We established that the suppression of integrin {alpha}2 was crucial for TF within type I collagen gel, although E7820 suppressed expression of integrins {alpha}2, {alpha}3, {alpha}5, and ß1 in confluent culture. Up-regulation of integrin {alpha}2 through the activation of PKC by PMA suppressed the effect of E7820 in the TF model, whereas addition of antibody against integrin {alpha}2 canceled the PMA effect, leading to inhibition of TF. These results suggest that PMA abrogates the inhibitory activity of E7820 on TF through increasing the expression of integrin {alpha}2. It is reported that the expression of both integrin {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 is regulated by VEGF in microvascular endothelial cells, and a combination of inhibitory antibodies against integrins {alpha}1 and 2 inhibited VEGF-driven angiogenesis in a Matrigel model in mice (32) . Recently, it was reported that an inhibitory antibody against integrin {alpha}2 also inhibited tumor angiogenesis in a mouse model (33) . Because the expression of integrin {alpha}1 was not detected in HUVEC, the suppression of integrin {alpha}2 seems to be sufficient for the inhibition of TF. Furthermore, Davis and Camarillo (34) reported that vacuole and lumen formation within collagen gel are dependent on integrin {alpha}2, supporting our results.

The effect of E7820 on the expression of integrin {alpha}2 in HUVEC was detected at the mRNA level at 6 h after treatment. Because no alteration of the expression of integrin mRNAs, except integrin {alpha}2 mRNA, was detected at 12 h, the decrement of integrin {alpha}3, {alpha}5, and ß1 on the cell surface might be a secondary effect arising from the decrement of integrin {alpha}2 subunit. Because it has been reported that transfection of antisense DNA to integrin {alpha}2 mRNA led to a decrease of integrin ß1 on the cell surface (35) , the alteration of integrin ß1 by E7820 may also result from the decrement of integrin {alpha}2 mRNA.

Inhibition rate of E7820 against integrin subunits was approximately up to 50% in HUVEC, whereas TF of HUVEC was clearly inhibited in collagen gel model. A similar phenomenon was reported by using antisense or DNAzyme to integrin ß1 and ß3 mRNA (36) . DNAzyme suppressed expression of integrin ß1 or ß3 mRNA by 40–50% in HUVEC; however, capillary TF in Matrigel completely inhibited, coinciding with our finding. These findings suggest that alternation of integrin expression on endothelial cells strongly affects capillary TF.

E7820 modulates integrin {alpha}2 mRNA in HUVEC, although its mechanism is unclear. Two possibilities can be considered. An analytical study of transcriptional regulation of integrin {alpha}2 was reported in megakaryotic cell lines, and it was speculated that the transcription of integrin {alpha}2 was regulated through the specific enhancer region of the {alpha}2 gene in platelets (37 , 38) . Because E7820 showed different activities on integrin {alpha}2 expression in endothelial cells and fibroblast cells (data not shown), E7820 may act on a regulating molecule on an enhancer region in endothelial cells. Another possibility relates to integrin {alpha}2 mRNA stability. It was reported that ECM and growth factor affected the stability of mRNAs of integrin subunits. The stability of integrin {alpha}v and ß3 mRNAs in endothelial cells was enhanced by fibrin compared with collagen (39) , and platelet-derived growth factor increased the stability of integrin {alpha}2 mRNA in fibroblast cells cultured in collagen gel, whereas on tissue culture plates, platelet-derived growth factor stabilized integrin {alpha}3 and {alpha}5 mRNAs but not {alpha}2 mRNA (40) . Although the mechanism of regulation of integrin {alpha}2 mRNA stability is not reported in endothelial cells, E7820 may act on this modulation system of integrin mRNAs. Our preliminary data suggests that E7820 destabilizes integrin {alpha}2 mRNA in HUVEC.

Integrin consists of heterodimers of 18 {alpha} subunits and 8 ß subunits. It was reported that antagonists to integrin {alpha}vß3 or {alpha}vß5 induced apoptosis of endothelium in newly formed vessels (41) , and inhibited in vivo angiogenesis and tumor growth, although E7820 did not affect the expression of {alpha}v. However, observations in integrin {alpha}v-, ß3-, and ß3/ß5-null mice seemed inconsistent with the above findings. All of the null mice exhibited angiogenesis, and furthermore, ß3/ß5-null mice showed enhanced-tumor growth (42 , 43) . These results suggest that antagonism and suppression of integrin expression result in different effects depending on the integrin subunits involved. Integrin ß1 was also thought to be necessary for tumor-induced angiogenesis. Although ES cells formed large teratomas, including microvessels differentiated from the ES cells, after inoculation into nude mice, integrin ß1 null cells grew only small tumors, which did not contain microvessels derived from ES cells. Furthermore, studies of knockout mice revealed that the integrin {alpha}3, 4, and 5 subunits are also related to vessel formation. Recently, it was reported that some angiogenesis inhibitors associate with integrin subunits. Endostatin associated with integrin {alpha}5 and {alpha}v subunits, and angiostatin, tamustatin, and arresten, carboxy peptides of collagen IV, associated with integrin {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}1ß1 (44 , 45) . These peptides showed significant antitumor effects in mouse models, although their mechanism of action is unclear. In regard to the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by growth factors, various integrin complexes are thought to function in an anchorage-dependent manner (46) . Because E7820 decreased the expression level of several integrin subunits such as {alpha}2, 3, 5, 6, and ß1 in subconfluent cells, it should be elucidated whether these changes are related to inhibition of proliferation of HUVEC. Recent findings strongly suggest that several integrin subunits and physiological inhibitors regulate the angiogenesis process. A study of the action mechanisms of the above inhibitors and E7820 should greatly improve our understanding of the role of integrins in angiogenesis.

E7820 showed significant efficacy against human colorectal cancer (WiDr cell line) -induced angiogenesis in the DAS model on oral administration and delayed in vivo growth of s.c. implanted WiDr cells in nude mice. We reported previously that angiogenesis induced by WiDr cells was dependent on VEGF (31) . E7820 also significantly inhibited the growth of LoVo cells, an effect which was strongly suppressed by antibody against VEGF (47) , suggesting that E7820 is effective against VEGF-dependent angiogenesis and tumor growth. Moreover, there was no effect on body weight change during E7820 treatment, and it was possible to continue administration at the maximal tolerated dose for 6 weeks (data not shown). Furthermore, oral administration of E7820 decreased the level of integrin {alpha}2 on platelets in mice, although the number of platelets showed no change. Study of integrin {alpha}2 level on tumor-induced neovasculature is also of interest for understanding action mechanism of E7820 and is under investigation. The effect of E7820 on integrin {alpha}2 in platelets might be useful as a marker of biological effects and could be helpful to determine an effective dose to achieve long-term survival of cancer patients.

Because angiogenesis involves multiple systems in vivo, the possibility that tolerance to an angiogenesis inhibitor might develop must be considered. Therefore, novel types of angiogenesis inhibitors might be useful to decrease the risk of resistance developing to other angiogenesis inhibitors. Because E7820 has a novel action mechanism, suppression of integrin {alpha}2 expression, it might be useful in combination therapy with antagonists against VEGF, which up-regulates integrin {alpha}2 (32) , for example. Antiangiogenic therapy based on regulation of integrin also might be more effective if combinations of integrin inhibitors were used according to the expression patterns of integrin on endothelium. Thus, the discovery of E7820 may provide the basis for a new strategy for antiangiogenic therapy, and clinical evaluation of E7820 seems warranted.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 These authors contributed equally to this study. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., 5-1-3 Tokodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. Phone: 81-298-47-5740; Fax: 81-298-47-2037; E-mail: t-wakabayashi{at}hhc.eisai.co.jp Back

3 The abbreviations used are: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; ES, embryonic stem; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; FBS, fetal bovine serum; TF, tube formation; SFM, serum-free medium; DAS, dorsal air sac. Back

Received 4/23/02. Accepted 8/29/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Folkman J., Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 10931-10934, 1992.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ferrara N. Molecular and biological properties of vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Mol. Med., 77: 527-543, 1999.[Medline]
  3. Suri C., McClain J., Thurston G., McDonald D. M., Zhou H., Oldmixon E. H., Sato T. N., Yancopoulos G. D. Increased vascularization in mice overexpressing angiopoietin-1. Science (Wash. DC), 282: 468-471, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Klagsbrun M., D’Amore P. A. Regulators of angiogenesis. Ann. Rev. Physiol., 53: 217-239, 1991.[Medline]
  5. Grant S. D., Kleinman H. K., Goldberg I. D., Bhargava M. M., Nickoloff B. J., Kinsella J. L., Polverini P., Rosen E. M. Scatter factor induces blood vessel formation in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 1937-1941, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. DeLisser H. M., Christofidou-Solomidou M., Strieter R. M., Burdick M. D., Robinson C. S., Wexler R. S., Kerr J. S., Garlanda C., Merwin J. R., Madri J. A., Albelda S. M. Involvement of endothelial PECAM-1/CD31 in angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol., 151: 671-677, 1997.[Abstract]
  7. Bach T. L., Barsigian C., Chalupowicz D. G., Busler D., Yaen C. H., Grant D. S., Martinez J. VE-Cadherin mediates endothelial cell capillary tube formation in fibrin and collagen gels. Exp. Cell Res., 238: 324-334, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Lawson N. D., Scheer N., Pham V. N., Kim C. H., Chitnis A. B., Campos-Ortega J. A., Weinstein B. M. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development, 128: 3675-3683, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Eliceiri B. P., Cheresh D. A. Adhesion events in angiogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 5: 563-568, 2001.
  10. Bloch W., Forsberg E., Lentini S., Brakebusch C., Martin K., Krell H. W., Weidle U. H., Addicks K., Fassler R. ß 1 integrin is essential for teratoma growth and angiogenesis. J. Cell Biol., 139: 265-278, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bazzoni G., Dejana E., Lampugnani M. G. Endothelial adhesion molecules in the development of the vascular tree: the garden of forking paths. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 11: 573-581, 1999.[Medline]
  12. Brooks P. C., Clark R. A., Cheresh D. A. Requirement of vascular integrin {alpha}vß3 for angiogenesis. Science (Wash. DC), 264: 569-571, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. O’Reilly M. S., Holmgren L., Shing Y., Chen C., Rosenthal R. A., Moses M., Lane W. S., Cao Y., Sage E. H., Folkman J. Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell, 79: 315-328, 1994.[Medline]
  14. O’Reilly M. S., Boehm T., Shing Y., Fukai N., Vasios G., Lane W. S., Flynn E., Birkhead J. R., Olsen B. R., Folkman J. Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell, 88: 277-285, 1997.[Medline]
  15. Boehm T., Folkman J., Browder T., O’Reilly M. S. Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance. Nature (Lond.), 390: 404-407, 1997.[Medline]
  16. Tarui T., Miles L. A., Takada Y. Specific interaction of angiostatin with integrin {alpha}(v)ß(3) in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 39562-39568, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Rehn M., Veikkola T., Kukk-Valdre E., Nakamura H., Iimonen M., Lombardo C., Pihlajaniemi T., Alitalo K., Vuori K. Interaction of endostatin with integrins implicated in angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 1024-1029, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Maren T. H., Sanyal G. The activity of sulfonamides and anions against the carbonic anhydrases of animals, plants, and bacteria. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 23: 439-459, 1983.[Medline]
  19. Mallinson C. N., Chlouverakis K., Hardwick C., Mistry S. J., Butterfield W. H. A clinical trial of glymidine (Gondafon). Guys. Hosp. Rep., 117: 267-274, 1968.[Medline]
  20. Famaey J. P. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological evidence of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by nimesulide: an overview. Inflamm. Res., 46: 437-446, 1997.[Medline]
  21. Yoshino H., Ueda N., Niijima J., Sugumi H., Kotake Y., Koyanagi N., Yoshimatsu K., Asada M., Watanabe T., Nagasu T., Kitoh K. Novel sulfonamides as potential, systemically active antitumor agents. J. Med. Chem., 35: 2496-2507, 1992.[Medline]
  22. Owa T., Yoshino H., Okauchi T., Yoshimatsu K., Ozawa Y., Sugi N. H., Nagasu T., Koyanagi N., Kitoh K. Discovery of novel antitumor sulfonamides targeting G1 phase of the cell cycle. J. Med. Chem., 42: 3789-3799, 1999.[Medline]
  23. Ozawa Y., Sugi N. H., Nagasu T., Owa T., Watanabe T., Koyanagi N., Yoshino H., Kitoh K., Yoshimatsu K. E7070, a novel sulphonamide agent with potent antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Cancer, 17: 2275-2282, 2001.
  24. Jaffe E. A., Nachman R. L., Becker C. G., Minick C. R. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J. Clin. Investig., 52: 2745-2756, 1973.
  25. Sakamoto N., Tanaka N. G., Togho A., Ogawa H. Heparin plus cortisone acetate inhibit tumor growth by blocking endothelial cell proliferation. Cancer J., 1: 55-58, 1986.
  26. Funahashi Y., Wakabayashi T., Semba T., Sonoda J., Kitoh K., Yoshimatsu K. Establishment of a quantitative mouse dorsal air sac model and its application to evaluate a new angiogenesis inhibitor. Oncol. Res., 11: 319-329, 1999.[Medline]
  27. Ingber D., Fujita T., Kishimoto S., Sudo K., Kanamaru T., Brem H., Folkman J. Synthetic analogues of fumagillin that inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumour growth. Nature (Lond.), 348: 555-557, 1990.[Medline]
  28. Fong T. A. T., Shawver L. K., Sun L., Tang C., App H., Powell T. J., Kim Y. H., Schreck R., Wang X., Risau W., Ullrich A., Hirth K. P., McMahon G. SU5416 is a potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (Flk-1/KDR) that inhibits tyrosine kinase catalysis, tumor vascularization, and growth of multiple tumor types. Cancer Res., 59: 99-106, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rasmussen H. S., McCann P. P. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition as a novel anticancer strategy: a review with special focus on batimastat and marimastat. Pharmacol. Ther., 75: 69-75, 1997.[Medline]
  30. Hata-Sugi N., Kawase-Kageyama R., Wakabayashi T. Characterization of rat aortic fragment within collagen gel as an angiogenesis model; capillary morphology may reflect the action mechanisms of angiogenesis inhibitors. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 25: (2002)446-451, [Medline]
  31. Rosfjord E. C., Maemura M., Johnson M. D., Torri J. A., Akiyama S. K., Woods V. L., Jr., Dickson R. B. Activation of protein kinase C by phorbol esters modulates {alpha}2ß1 integrin on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res., 248: 260-271, 1999.[Medline]
  32. Senger D. R., Claffey K. P., Benes J. E., Perruzzi C. A., Sergiou A. P., Detmar M. Angiogenesis promoted by vascular endothelial growth factor: regulation through {alpha}1ß1 and {alpha}2ß1 integrins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 13612-13617, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Senger D. R., Perruzzi C. A., Streit M., Koteliansky V. E., Fougerolles A. R., Detmar M. The a1b1 and a2b1 integrins provide critical support for vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, endothelial cell migration, and tumor angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol., 160: 195-204, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Davis G. E., Camarillo C. W. An {alpha}2ß1 integrin-dependent pinocytic mechanism involving intracellular vacule formation and coalescence regulates capillary lumen and tube formation in three-dimensional collagen matrix. Exp. Cell Res., 224: 39-51, 1996.[Medline]
  35. Keely P. J., Fong A. M., Zutter M. M., Santoro S. A. Alternation of collagen-dependent adhesion, motility, and morphogenesis by the expression of antisense {alpha}2 integrin mRNA in mammary cells. J. Cell Sci., 108: 595-607, 1995.[Abstract]
  36. Cieslak M., Niewiarowska J., Nawrot M., Koziolkiewicz M., Stec W. J., Cierniewski C. S. DNAzymes to ß 1 and ß 3 mRNA down-regulate expression of the targeted integrins and inhibit endothelial cell capillary tube formation in fibrin and matrigel. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 6779-6787, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Zutter M. M., Santoro S. A., Painter A. S., Tsung Y. L., Gafford A. The human {alpha} 2 integrin gene promoter. Identification of positive and negative regulatory elements important for cell-type and developmentally restricted gene expression. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 463-469, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zutter M. M., Painter A. D., Yang X. The megakaryocyte/platelet-specific enhancer of the {alpha}2ß1 integrin gene: two tandem AP1 sites and the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade. Blood, 93: 1600-1611, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Feng X., Clark R. A., Galanakis D., Tonnesen M. G. Fibrin and collagen differentially regulate human dermal microvascular endothelial cell integrins: stabilization of {alpha}v/ß3 mRNA by fibrin. J. Investig. Dermatol., 113: 913-919, 1999.[Medline]
  40. Xu J., Clark R. A. Extracellular matrix alters PDGF regulation of fibroblast integrins. J. Cell Biol., 132: 239-249, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Stromblad S., Becker J. C., Yebra M., Brooks P. C., Cheresh D. A. Suppression of p53 activity and p21WAF1/CIP1 expression by vascular cell integrin {alpha}Vß3 during angiogenesis. J. Clin. Investig., 98: 426-433, 1996.[Medline]
  42. Bader B. L., Rayburn H., Crowley D., Hynes R. O. Extensive vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and organogenesis precede lethality in mice lacking all av integrins. Cell, 95: 507-519, 1998.[Medline]
  43. Reynolds L. E., Wyder L., Lively J. C., Taverna D., Robinson S. D., Huang X., Sheppard D., Hynes R. O., Hodivala-Dilke K. M. Enhanced pathological angiogenesis in mice lacking ß3 integrin or ß3 and ß5 integrins. Nat. Med., 8: 27-34, 2002.[Medline]
  44. Maeshima Y., Colorado P. C., Torre A., Holthaus K. A., Grunkemeyer J. A., Ericksen M. B., Hopfer H., Xiao Y., Stillman I. E., Kalluri R. Distinct antitumor properties of a type IV collagen domain derived from basement membrane. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 21340-21348, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Colorado P. C., Torre A., Kamphaus G., Maeshima Y., Hopfer H., Takahashi K., Volk R., Zamborsky E. D., Herman S., Sarkar P. K., Ericksen M. B., Dhanabal M., Simons M., Post M., Kufe D. W., Weichselbaum R. R., Sukhatme V. P., Kalluri R. Anti-angiogenic cues from vascular basement membrane collagen. Cancer Res., 60: 2520-2526, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Aplin A. E., Short S. M., Juliano R. L. Anchorage-dependent regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by growth factors is supported by a variety of integrin {alpha} chains. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 31223-31228, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Asano M., Yukita A., Suzuki H. Wide spectrum of antitumor activity of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody to human vascular endothelial growth factor. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 90: 93-100, 1999.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. Silva, G. D'Amico, K. M. Hodivala-Dilke, and L. E. Reynolds
Integrins: The Keys to Unlocking Angiogenesis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2008; 28(10): 1703 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. P. Woodall, A. Nystrom, R. A. Iozzo, J. A. Eble, S. Niland, T. Krieg, B. Eckes, A. Pozzi, and R. V. Iozzo
Integrin {alpha}2 1 Is the Required Receptor for Endorepellin Angiostatic Activity
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2335 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. K. Trousdale, S. V. Pollak, J. Klein, L. Lobel, Y. Funahashi, N. Feirt, and J. W. Lustbader
Single-Chain Bifunctional Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)-C-Terminal Peptide (CTP) Is Superior to the Combination Therapy of Recombinant VEGF plus FSH-CTP in Stimulating Angiogenesis during Ovarian Folliculogenesis
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1296 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. Matsuura, Y. Miyamae, K. Yamane, Y. Nagao, Y. Hamada, N. Kawaguchi, T. Katsuki, K. Hirata, S.-I. Sumi, and H. Ishikawa
Aged Garlic Extract Inhibits Angiogenesis and Proliferation of Colorectal Carcinoma Cells
J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 842S - 846S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C.-H. Chung, W.-B. Wu, and T.-F. Huang
Aggretin, a snake venom-derived endothelial integrin {alpha}2{beta}1 agonist, induces angiogenesis via expression of vascular endothelial growth factor
Blood, March 15, 2004; 103(6): 2105 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Semba, Y. Funahashi, N. Ono, Y. Yamamoto, N. H. Sugi, M. Asada, K. Yoshimatsu, and T. Wakabayashi
An Angiogenesis Inhibitor E7820 Shows Broad-Spectrum Tumor Growth Inhibition in a Xenograft Model: Possible Value of Integrin {alpha}2 on Platelets as a Biological Marker
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1430 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Sweeney, G. DiLullo, S. J. Slater, J. Martinez, R. V. Iozzo, J. L. Lauer-Fields, G. B. Fields, and J. D. S. Antonio
Angiogenesis in Collagen I Requires {alpha}2{beta}1 Ligation of a GFP*GER Sequence and Possibly p38 MAPK Activation and Focal Adhesion Disassembly
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30516 - 30524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wakabayashi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wakabayashi, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online