| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology and Genetics |
Institute of Pathology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epigenetic inactivation is well established in invasive breast cancer (2) and already detectable in preinvasive intraductal carcinomas (3 , 4) . But thus far very little is known about the association of hypermethylation in breast cancer with particular clinical or histopathological features.
DAP3
kinase is a positive mediator of IFN-
-induced programmed cell death (5)
. It suppresses tumor growth and metastasis by increasing the occurrence of apoptosis in vivo (6)
. Recently we identified and characterized epigenetic alterations contributing to the development and progression of breast cancer (4)
. Extending this study to apoptosis regulating genes, we analyzed whether the DAP kinase gene is also methylated in mammary carcinoma. The hypermethylation of this important apoptosis regulating gene was demonstrated previously in a variety of B-cell lymphomas and epithelial tumors (Refs. 7
, 8
and references therein), but not yet in breast cancer, one of the most frequent malignant neoplasias in women.
Therefore we, firstly, determined which cytosine residues in the DAP kinase gene are methylated in breast tumor biopsies. Secondly, based on these results, we developed a quantitative real-time PCR based assay for the rapid and sensitive quantitative detection of DAP kinase gene hypermethylation in a large series of histologically defined invasive breast cancer specimens, as well as in laser-microdissected premalignant and malignant preinvasive specimens. Thirdly, we analyzed the functional consequences of hypermethylation by measuring the DAP kinasemRNA transcript levels in primary tumor specimens using real-time PCR technology.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For use as control, blood was collected after informed consent from 10 healthy volunteers.
Cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and cultivated according to the suppliers instructions.
DNA Extraction and Laser Microdissection.
Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh-frozen biopsies, the peripheral blood mononuclear cell fraction, and from tissue culture cells using proteinase K digestion and organic extractions according to standard procedures. Laser-microdissection of stained histological sections was used for the study of in situ lesions. Subsequent isolation of DNA was performed essentially as described (9)
.
Bisulfite Sequencing and Methylation-specific PCR.
Bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA was performed as described (10)
. Approximately 20 ng of converted DNA were amplified using the methylation-independent primer pairs 1I5'/3' and 2I5'/3' as described (10)
. All of the primers and probes used in this study are available at our website.4
For sequencing of individual clones the PCR products were inserted into an appropriate plasmid vector using the Topo cloning kit (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), sequenced using the CycleReader Auto DNA sequencing kit from Fermentas (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Roth, Germany), and analyzed on a LI-COR 4200 automatic sequencer (LICOR. Inc., Lincoln, NE).
Quantitative Methylation Analysis.
Quantitative methylation analysis was performed essentially as described (4)
.
RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR.
Extraction of RNA from fresh-frozen biopsies and quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed essentially as described (11)
.
Immunohistochemistry.
The immunohistochemical stainings were performed after our routine diagnostic procedure using tyramine amplification (12)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After methylation-independent amplification and subsequent subcloning of PCR fragments, we used genomic bisulfite sequencing to determine the cytosine residues methylated in breast tumor cell lines and primary breast tumor biopsies (see Fig. 1
). The DAP kinasemRNA-negative cell line MCF-7 shows nearly complete methylation of the 5' region of the DAP kinase gene, whereas the DAP kinase mRNA-positive cell line MDA-MB-361 contains nearly no methylated cytosine residues in this region of the DAP kinase gene (Fig. 1B)
. In contrast to other genes described in the literature (e.g., p15INK4b; Ref. 13
), the DAP kinase gene is quite homogeneously methylated in tumor biopsies (Fig. 1C)
, which facilitates the design of appropriate primers and hybridization probes for quantitative methylation analysis.
|
|
Altogether 12 normal breast tissue specimens were tested for DAP kinase gene methylation. In one case a low level of methylation (
1%) could be detected (see Fig. 2C
). This is in very good agreement with the results of Kang et al. (7)
who also analyzed 13 specimens of normal breast tissue during their study of DAP kinase methylation in gastric carcinoma.
Frequent DAP Kinase Gene Methylation in Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.
A large series of invasive breast cancer specimens (n = 106) was analyzed for DAP kinase hypermethylation using the new quantitative real-time PCR assay. The overall frequency of hypermethylation was 16% (17 of 106). Fig. 2C
demonstrates the clear distinction between samples with no or very low level methylation and clear-cut methylation. Varying the threshold between 5 and 20% does not change the results. Therefore, 10% was chosen as a threshold for classifying a sample as "hypermethylated."
All of the cases underwent a morphological reassessment of the tumor specimens in a blinded fashion. Comparing methylation data with histopathological classification revealed a statistically highly significant association between DAP kinase gene methylation and the lobular subtype of invasive breast cancer: 53% hypermethylation in lobular invasive cancer versus 9% in ductal invasive cancer (Fig. 3A
;
2 test, P < 0.001).
|
|
To define whether DAP kinase gene methylation occurs already in premalignant proliferations of the ductal epithelium, laser-microdissected intraductal Paps (n = 6) and epithelial Hyps (n = 8) were analyzed for DAP kinase hypermethylation. No DAP kinase hypermethylation could be found in these premalignant lesions (Fig. 3A
, bars 5 and 6). The methylation status of the cyclinD2 gene and the RASSF1A genes has been already assessed in a previous study (Ref. 4
; Fig. 3B
, bar 5 and 6; Fig. 3C
, bar 5 and 6).
Expression of DNMTs.
Because conflicting reports exist concerning the relationship between gene hypermethylation in tumor cells and mRNA expression of DNMTs (Ref. 14
and references therein), we determined in a subset of samples the expression of DNMT 1, DNMT 3A, and DNMT 3B using a real-time RT-PCR assay. No significant correlation between DNMTmRNA expression and DAP kinase gene hypermethylation could be shown (data not shown).
Correlation of DAP Kinase Hypermethylation and Clinical Parameters.
No correlation between DAP kinase gene methylation and tumor size, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade could be found. For several genes an age-related increase in methylation levels has been described (15)
. Therefore, we analyzed the age-distribution of the whole patient group and the subset of samples displaying hypermethylation. No significant differences could be found (mean age 59 and 60 years, respectively; median age: 59 and 58 years, respectively). But we found that epigenetic inactivation of the DAP kinase gene and p53 overexpression as determined by immunohistochemistry are mutually exclusive (
2 test with Yates-correction, P < 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation exists between estrogen receptor positivity and DAP kinase gene methylation (
2 test, P < 0.01; data not shown).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting an epigenetic alteration associated specifically with this histological subtype of breast cancer. Droufakou et al. (16) described in detail epigenetic inactivation of the E-cadherin gene in lobular breast cancer, but this event is not specific for this histological subtype (17) .
To date only a few studies addressed the question whether different histological subtypes of cancer originating in the same organ differ in the epigenetic inactivation of crucial genes. Kim et al. (18)
demonstrated for p16INK4a gene hypermethylation a significant correlation with the squamous cell type of lung cancer. Osada et al. (19)
discovered a strong association between small lung cell cancer and 143-3
hypermethylation, which was rarely found in non-small cell lung cancer. Graff et al. (20)
found different methylation frequencies for the E-cadherin gene in different subtypes of thyroid carcinoma.
The finding that low-level methylation can be detected in normal breast tissue highlights the requirement for quantitative assessment of promoter hypermethylation in tumor specimens.
During the preparation of this manuscript Simpson et al. (21) reported also a good correlation between DAP kinase gene hypermethylation and loss of expression for pituitary tumors, which parallels our findings in breast tissue. By contrast, however, we found no indication for DAP kinase deletion in breast cancer. This may reflect tumor-specific inactivation mechanisms. Small or interstitial deletions or deletions affecting only a very small subfraction of tumor cells cannot be excluded.
The results described in the literature concerning the quantification of DNMTmRNA are not directly comparable because of different methodologies used. The data presented in this study support a model invoking post-transcriptional up-regulation or activation of these enzymes, as well as altered protein-protein interactions (14) .
A morphological hallmark of invasive lobular carcinoma is a striking loss of cell-cell interaction not seen in most other cohesively growing epithelial malignancies. The functional loss of the DAP kinase gene may contribute to a resistance of the invasive tumor cells against apoptosis because of altered cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions.
The hypermethylation of the DAP kinase gene appears to be specific for malignant transformed cells, because the premalignant lesions ductal Hyp and intraductal Pap are completely devoid of promoter hypermethylation (Fig. 3A
, bar 5 and 6). The comparison with the cyclinD2 and the RASSF1A genes clearly shows that epigenetic inactivation in breast tissue is a gene and histological-type-specific phenomenon. In contrast to the age-related hypermethylation of several genes reported in the literature (see Ref. 15
and references therein), we did not find any correlation between DAP kinase gene methylation and the age of the patients, indicating also that the age-related increase in methylation seems to be a gene-specific phenomenon. That fact that the epigenetic inactivation of the DAP kinase gene and the overexpression of the p53 gene are mutually exclusive events in our series of primary breast cancer specimens supports results obtained previously with embryonic fibroblasts. Raveh et al. (22)
could show that DAP kinase and p53are acting in the same proapoptotic pathway counteracting oncogene-induced transformation.
The analysis of morphologically defined intraductal tumor cells after laser-assisted microdissection enabled the identification of DAP kinase hypermethylation as a rather late event in the clonal evolution of lobular breast cancer. Therefore, it may serve as a new progression marker in this histological subtype of mammary carcinoma.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe, Grant 101842-Le I and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant DFG Fe 516/1-2 ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: Lehmann.Ulrich{at}MH-Hannover.de ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: DAP, death-associated protein; CT-value, threshold of detection; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; Hyp, hyperplasia; LCIS, lobular carcinoma in situ; Pap, papilloma; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR. ![]()
4 Internet address: http://www.mh-hannover.de/institute/pathologie/DAP_K_CAN.htm. ![]()
Received 5/24/02. Accepted 9/12/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Timmerbeul, C. M. Garrett-Engele, U. Kossatz, X. Chen, E. Firpo, V. Grunwald, K. Kamino, L. Wilkens, U. Lehmann, J. Buer, et al. Testing the importance of p27 degradation by the SCFskp2 pathway in murine models of lung and colon cancer PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 14009 - 14014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ai, W.-J. Kim, T.-Y. Kim, C. R. Fields, N. A. Massoll, K. D. Robertson, and K. D. Brown Epigenetic Silencing of the Tumor Suppressor Cystatin M Occurs during Breast Cancer Progression Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 7899 - 7909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Melnikov, R. B. Gartenhaus, A. S. Levenson, N. A. Motchoulskaia, and V. V. Levenson (Chernokhvostov) MSRE-PCR for analysis of gene-specific DNA methylation Nucleic Acids Res., June 8, 2005; 33(10): e93 - e93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lehmann, I. Berg-Ribbe, L. U. Wingen, K. Brakensiek, T. Becker, J. Klempnauer, B. Schlegelberger, H. Kreipe, and P. Flemming Distinct Methylation Patterns of Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors Revealed by Quantitative Methylation Profiling Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3654 - 3660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dulaimi, J. Hillinck, I. I. de Caceres, T. Al-Saleem, and P. Cairns Tumor Suppressor Gene Promoter Hypermethylation in Serum of Breast Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6189 - 6193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Brakensiek, F. Langer, H. Kreipe, U. Lehmann, M. T. Voso, A. Scardocci, L. Valentini, F. Guidi, S. Hohaus, and G. Leone Low level of DAP-kinase DNA methylation in myelodysplastic syndrome Blood, September 1, 2004; 104(5): 1586 - 1588. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levy, G. Plu-Bureau, Y. Decroix, D. Hugol, W. Rostene, A. Kimchi, and A. Gompel Death-Associated Protein Kinase Loss of Expression Is a New Marker for Breast Cancer Prognosis Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 10(9): 3124 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-S. Wong, D. L.-W. Kwong, J. S.-T. Sham, W. I. Wei, Y.-L. Kwong, and A. P.-W. Yuen Quantitative Plasma Hypermethylated DNA Markers of Undifferentiated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2401 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-M. Chen, H.-L. Chen, T. H.-C. Hsiau, A. H.-A. Hsiau, H. Shi, G. J. R. Brock, S. H. Wei, C. W. Caldwell, P. S. Yan, and T. H.-M. Huang Methylation Target Array for Rapid Analysis of CpG Island Hypermethylation in Multiple Tissue Genomes Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2003; 163(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |