Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tong, W.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.-Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tong, W.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.-Q.
[Cancer Research 62, 6990-6996, December 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Synergistic Role of Ku80 and Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase in Suppressing Chromosomal Aberrations and Liver Cancer Formation1

Wei-Min Tong, Ulrich Cortes, M. Prakash Hande, Hiroko Ohgaki, Luciane R. Cavalli, Peter M. Lansdorp, Bassem R. Haddad and Zhao-Qi Wang2

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 69008 Lyon, France [W-M. T., U. C., H. O., Z-Q. W.]; Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 [M. P. H.]; Institute for Molecular and Human Genetics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC 20007 [L. R. C., B. R. H.]; and Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada [P. M. L.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Liver cancer is one of the major human tumors in the world. Basic and epidemiological studies have proposed that the major risk factors for liver cancer include alcohol and diet as well as infection with hepatitis B and C viruses. However, the mechanistic clues for the development of this type of cancer is largely unknown. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) and a component of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) machinery, Ku80, are two major DNA end-binding molecules that play a multifunctional role in DNA damage signaling and repair, recombination as well as the maintenance of genomic stability. Here we show that the interaction of PARP-1 and Ku80 is essential for development because PARP-1/Ku80 double null mice died at embryonic day (E) 9.5. Interestingly, haplo-insufficiency of Ku80 in PARP-1-/- mice promotes the development of hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These tumors exhibited a multistage tumor progression associated with the loss of E-cadherin expression and the mutation of ß-catenin. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that Ku80 heterozygosity elevated chromosomal instability in PARP-1-/- cells and that these liver tumors harbored a high degree of chromosomal aberrations including fragmentations, end-to-end fusions, and recurrent nonreciprocal translocations (NRT). These features are reminiscent of human HCC. Taken together, these data implicate a synergistic function of Ku80 and PARP-1 in minimized chromosome aberrations and cancer development and suggest that defects in DNA end-processing molecules may be etiological factors in human HCC formation.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Genomic integrity and an intact DNA repair process are essential for normal development and for tumor suppression (1, 2, 3) . PARP-13 is a nuclear enzyme that catalyzes the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of target proteins in response to DNA damage and has been proposed to play a role in DNA repair/recombination and cell death and proliferation, as well as in stabilization of the genome (4 , 5) . Although mice lacking PARP-1 develop normally (6, 7, 8) , and exhibit normal DNA excision repair and unaltered V(D)J recombination as well as immunoglobulin class switching, PARP-1 null mice are hypersensitive to high doses of {gamma}-irradiation (Refs. 7 , 9 , 10 ; see also Ref. 11 ). PARP-1 null cells exhibit an increased degree of chromosomal instability characterized by an increased frequency of spontaneous SCE and DNA damage-induced micronuclei formation (7 , 9) . Moreover, PARP-1 mutant mice and cells show shortened telomeres and chromosome aberrations, including chromosome fusions and fragmentation as well as chromosome loss and gain (12, 13, 14) . These data suggest that PARP-1 plays an important role in stabilizing the genome, most likely via shuttling on and off DNA strand breaks. Previous studies have shown that, although PARP-1-/- mice rarely develop spontaneous tumors (summarized in Ref. 11 ), in a p53-deficient background, these mice show increased tumor incidence and develop a wide spectrum of tumors including a high frequency of epithelial malignancy and brain tumors, in addition to sarcomas and lymphomas. This is most likely attributable to a combined effect of p53-mediated checkpoint failure, together with a high degree of chromosomal aberrations and impaired telomere function (14) .

PARP-1 is proposed to be an anti-recombinogenic factor because it temporarily occupies DNA breaks to prevent accidental recombination between homologous DNA available in a local environment (4) . Its inactivation, thus, results in a hyper-recombination activity as judged by spontaneously high levels of SCE (7 , 9) . Genetic studies, using PARP-1-deficient SCID mice in which DNA-PKcs is mutated, have further tested this elevated recombination activity. Although a large proportion (~75%) of PARP-1/SCID double mutant mice die soon after birth, PARP-1 deficiency partially rescues T-cell development in the survivors because of improved V(D)J recombination in these cells (15) . However, these mice succumbed to T-cell lymphoma, most likely because of increased anomalous V(D)J recombination (15) .

Ku80 is a DNA-binding subunit of the DNA-PK complex that is a major component of NHEJ machinery and is involved in DNA double-strand break repair and antigen receptor V(D)J recombination (16) . Mice lacking Ku80 are growth retarded and show deficiency in V(D)J recombination (17 , 18) and hypersensitivity to {gamma}-irradiation. Ku80-/- cells exhibit significant DNA repair defects (19 , 20) , telomere shortening, and chromosome instability (21, 22, 23) . Although Ku80-/- mice rarely develop spontaneous tumors (16) , these mice in a p53-deficient background exhibit a high penetrance of pro-B-cell lymphoma caused by the specific translocation of c-myc and IgH locus (22 , 24) . Although the increased cytogenetic aberrations have been detected in Ku80 heterozygous mutant cells (23) , its relevance to cancer has not been reported.

Given the high affinity of PARP-1 and Ku80 for DNA strand breaks and their colocalization at telomeres (4 , 12 , 16 , 23) , it is speculated that an interaction of these two molecules at DNA ends may be important for genomic stability and for other chromatin functions. Biochemical studies have shown that on DNA damage, PARP-1 and Ku80 are rapidly activated and compete in DNA end binding (25) , and that a complex of PARP-1 and Ku proteins can be coimmunoprecipitated (26) , suggesting that these two DNA-break-sensing molecules interact in response to DNA strand breaks in vitro. However, the role of this interaction in vivo is largely unknown.

In the present study, we investigated the biological significance of the interaction between PARP-1 and Ku80, and questioned whether the hyper-recombination induced by PARP-1 deficiency would facilitate aberrant joining of chromosome ends stalled by NHEJ deficiency, which would lead to cancer by characterizing PARP-1 and Ku80 double mutant mice. We demonstrate that Ku80 heterozygosity potentiates liver tumor formation in PARP-1-deficient mice; these tumors are associated with chromosome translocations, fusions, and fragmentations. These data indicate that PARP-1 interacts with NHEJ machinery to minimize aberrant rejoining of chromosome ends and, thereby, prevent tumor development.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Genotyping.
PARP-1-/- mice (7) were maintained in a pure 129/Sv background for more than four generations before breeding to Ku80+/- mice (Ref. 17 ; 129/Ev-C57BL/6-albino). To introduce a null PARP-1 allele into Ku80 knockout mice, PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- mice were intercrossed. Genotyping for PARP-1 was carried out by PCR as described previously (14) . Genotyping for Ku80 was carried out by PCR as described by Vogel et al. (27) .

Histopathological Analyses.
Animals were killed by ether anesthesia on decline in health (i.e., weight loss, paralysis, ruffling of fur, or inactivity). A full necropsy was performed and organs were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde, followed by dehydration and paraffin embedding. Histopathological analysis was carried out on a 3-µm-thick section stained with H&E. Immunostaining was essentially as described previously (14) . Antibodies were monoclonal antimouse E-cadherin (ECCD-2; Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) and monoclonal antimouse ß-catenin (Clone 14; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).

Southern Blotting, SSCP Analysis, and Direct DNA Sequencing.
For SSCP analysis, HCC samples from four PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- and seven PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- male mice at age 15–24 months were screened for mutations in exon 3 of the ß-catenin gene (28) . DNA was extracted from tumor cells microdissected from paraffin sections, and samples that showed mobility shift in SSCP analysis were further analyzed by direct DNA sequencing.

Cytogenetic Analyses and SKY.
Primary MEFs were isolated from embryos derived from intercrosses of PARP-1+/-Ku80+/-, or of PARP-1-/-Ku80+/-, according to protocols described previously (7) . For the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), metaphase spreads were prepared following standard procedures and were stained with DAPI. Telomere staining was performed using Cy-3-labeled (CCCTAA)3 peptide nucleic acid (14) . SKY of the primary HCC cells was performed as described previously (29) . For the SKY hybridization, whole-chromosome mouse probes were used (Applied Spectral Imaging, Inc.). At least 10 metaphases were analyzed for each of the HCC cases. Structural aberrations were determined to be clonal if found in two or more metaphases.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Null Mutation of Both PARP-1 and Ku80 Results in Lethality during Mid-Gestation.
Although PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- and PARP-1+/-Ku80-/- mice were born from intercrosses of PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- mice, after analyzing 746 newborns, we did not observe double null offspring (PARP-1-/-Ku80-/-), which suggests that the homozygous disruption of both the PARP-1 and Ku80 genes causes embryonic lethality. To define embryonic stages of gestation at which double null embryos die, embryos, at various stages, derived from intercrosses of PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- or of PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice were genotyped by PCR analysis. At embryonic day (E) 13.5, among 71 embryos genotyped, no PARP-1-/-Ku80-/- fetuses were found (Fig. 1A)Citation . However, 8 PARP-1-/-Ku80-/- embryos were readily identified at E9.5 after 44 embryos were analyzed (Fig. 1A)Citation . These fetuses were distinguishable from their littermates by being smaller in size, having 15–18 somites (versus 28–32 in normal embryos), and not having turned completely (Fig. 1B)Citation , indicative of growth retardation. To further define the stage when the growth retardation starts, we genotyped 74 embryos at E8.5 and 63 at E7.5. Whereas no obvious morphology alterations were found with E7.5 embryos, the smaller size of PARP-1-/-Ku80-/- embryos could be detected at E8.5 (Fig. 1A)Citation . Together, PARP-1-/-Ku80-/- embryos became growth retarded as early as E8.5 and died shortly after E9.5.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Growth retardation and early death of PARP-1/Ku80 double null embryos. A, genotypes of pups derived from intercrosses of PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- mice. DNA isolated from mice or embryos was analyzed by PCR. *, these embryos are growth retarded. In B, double null mutant embryos from embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) exhibit severe retardation in growth and development.

 
PARP-1 and Ku80 Synergistically Minimize Chromosomal Instability.
To investigate the impact of PARP-1 and Ku80 on chromosome integrity, we performed cytogenetic analysis on chromosomal structures from MEFs derived from PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- intercrossing. Whereas 10% of PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ MEFs were aneuploid and these cells contained various chromosome aberrations, 33% of PARP-1+/+Ku80-/- mutant cells were aneuploid and showed more complex cytogenetic changes (Table 1)Citation . Strikingly, 52% of metaphases that were derived from PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- MEFs displayed numerous chromosomal aberrations, including Robertsonian translocation, dicentrics, and chromosomal fragments/breaks compared with those in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ or PARP-1+/+Ku80+/- cells (Table 1)Citation , indicating that Ku80 heterozygosity enhanced chromosomal abnormalities of PARP-1-/- cells. Furthermore, PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- MEFs exhibited intermediate increase of end-to-end fusions (27%) and fragmentations (21%; Table 1Citation ). These data suggest that that PARP-1 and Ku80 play a synergistic role in minimizing the aberrant joining of chromosome ends as well as chromosomal fragmentations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Impact of PARP-1 and Ku80 deficiency on chromosomal integrity

Primary MEFs (the number of passages, <3) of given genotypes were used to prepare metaphases. Chromosome numbers and aberrations were scored in 16–102 metaphase spreads of each genotype after DAPI and FISH staining.

 
PARP-1/Ku80-deficient Mice Develop a High Frequency of Liver Tumors.
PARP-1 deficiency-induced telomere dysfunction and chromosomal instability facilitate tumor development in a p53 mutant background (14) and Ku80 null mutant cells suffer severe genomic instability and telomere dysfunction (21 , 23) . Interestingly, Ku80+/- cells exhibited a strong haplo-insufficiency phenotype in terms of the effect of Ku80 knockout in telomere length as well as genomic stability (23) . To test whether Ku80 heterozygosity might affect survival and tumor development in PARP-1-deficient mice, a large cohort of mice of various genotypes was monitored for a period of 12–24 months. Systematic macroscopic and microscopic analyses revealed a high frequency of tumor development in PARP-1/Ku80 double mutant mice (Table 2)Citation . Specifically, 40 (63%) of 64 PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- and 72 (79%) of 91 PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice developed tumors after 24 months of age with mainly epithelial tumors, whereas 6 (10%) of 58 control mice (wild-type, PARP-1+/+Ku80+/- and PARP-1+/-Ku80+/+) developed tumors in 24 months (Table 2)Citation . Notably, frequent hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas (HCC) were observed in aged (12~24 months) PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- (28%) and PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice (60%; Table 2Citation ; Fig. 2, A and BCitation ). These liver tumors were predominantly associated with male PARP-1-deficient Ku80+/- mice (75% of liver tumor-bearing mice). Histological analysis revealed that numerous foci of adenoma were presented in various lobes of liver (Fig. 2C)Citation ; and in those, HCC tumor cells were arranged often as trabecular or pseudoglandular structures (Fig. 2D)Citation , characteristic of the multistage progression. It was also noted that 10 (28%) of 36 PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ mice developed liver tumor, i.e., 7 with hepatocellular adenomas and 3 with HCC (Table 2)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Spectrum of spontaneous tumorsa

Different genotypes of mice derived from intercrosses of PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- mice were monitored for tumor development in a period of 12–24 months. A full histological examination was performed on all of the mice. Tumor spectra and the number of tumor-bearing mice are shown.

 


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Histological and genetic analyses of liver tumors in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice. Macroscopic view of a normal liver (A), and a massive liver tumor (B). Bar, 1 cm. C, a hepatocellular adenoma. D, a HCC exhibiting a distinct trabecular pattern with some areas of glandular structures. E–H, immunohistochemical staining of adjacent sections from hepatocellular adenoma (a; E and G) or carcinoma (F and H) with antibodies against E-cadherin (E and F) or ß-catenin (G and H). There is a lack of E-cadherin expression in the nontumoral part of the liver (n). Focal loss of E-cadherin in the carcinoma (F, left) is shown. ß-cadherin expression is primarily on the cell membrane of normal hepatocytes (not shown) and in hepatocellular adenoma (G) and in nuclei in carcinoma (H). I, sequencing analysis of tumor DNA showing specific mutations in the ß-catenin gene in HCC tumors. C–H, x40.

 
Loss of E-Cadherin Expression and Mutation of ß-Catenin are Associated with Development of Hepatocellular Adenoma and Carcinoma.
To further characterize the tumor progression, we examined the status of E-cadherin and ß-catenin at the different stages of these liver tumors in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice. Immunohistological analysis showed that E-cadherin was expressed at low levels at the cell membrane of normal hepatocytes but increased in hepatocellular adenomas (Fig. 2E)Citation . Strikingly, E-cadherin expression was largely undetectable in HCC (Fig. 2F)Citation , reminiscent of human HCC. Moreover, the progression changes of E-cadherin expression were evident in a subset of liver tumors containing mixed areas of adenoma and carcinoma, in which expression of E-cadherin was focally lost only in the HCC areas (data not shown). These data are consistent with the notion that down-regulation or loss of E-cadherin is involved in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma (30) .

We next analyzed expression of ß-catenin in these mice and found no difference in ß-catenin expression pattern between normal hepatocytes and adenoma cells, namely localization on the hepatocyte membrane (Fig. 2G)Citation . During the progression of adenoma to HCC, ß-catenin expression accumulated in the cytoplasm, and then in the nucleus (Fig. 2H)Citation . This transition of expression pattern was evident in 55% of the tumors analyzed. The nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin correlated well with the proliferation of tumor cells as evidenced by positive staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (data not shown). The alteration of E-cadherin and ß-catenin expression has also been seen in the tumor sections derived from PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ and PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- mice (data not shown).

Because the relocation of ß-catenin to cell nuclei in tumors is often caused by mutations in this molecule (31 , 32) , mutation of the ß-catenin gene was analyzed by SSCP and subsequent sequencing. Microdissection of tumor areas from histological sections was performed and tumor DNA was subject to PCR amplification. SSCP analysis revealed band shifts of ß-catenin in 4 of the 11 HCC tumors analyzed (data not shown). Subsequent sequencing of PCR products from these tumor cells showed four GAC->GCC mutations in codon 17 and one ACC->GCC mutation in codon 40 of the ß-catenin gene (Fig. 2I)Citation , indicating frequent ß-catenin mutations associated with HCC development in PARP-1-deficient Ku80+/- mice.

High Rate of Chromosomal Abnormalities in HCCs Derived from PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- Mice.
To understand the genetic basis of enhanced tumor development, we performed cytogenetic analysis on chromosomal structures from primary HCC cells derived from PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice. SKY analysis of metaphases prepared from primary HCC cells revealed both structural and numerical changes of chromosomes in tumor cells (Fig. 3)Citation . In tumor N1104, 42% of the cells analyzed were near-tetraploid, whereas the rest of the cells were near-diploid (40–42 chromosomes); all of the cells analyzed in tumor N1029 had a near-diploid karyotype (40–43 chromosomes). In N1029 tumor cells, we detected a consistent NRT between chromosomes 11 and 19 in every cell, t(11;19) (Fig. 3, A and B)Citation , suggesting clonal chromosomal aberrations. We confirmed the t(11;19) finding using standard FISH analysis with chromosomes 11- and 19-specific painting probes (Fig. 3C)Citation . On the basis of the appearance of this chromosome in an inverted DAPI image and the FISH and SKY results, this derivative chromosome [t(11;19)] is consistent with a pseudodicentric chromosome composed of the proximal regions of chromosomes 11 and 19 (Fig. 3B)Citation . In addition, all of the metaphases had a Robertsonian translocation either involving the two chromosome 1 homologues, rob(1;1) (Fig. 3, A and B)Citation or between chromosomes 1 and 2, rob(1;2), (Fig. 3, D and E)Citation . Small acentromeric markers (fragmentations) originating from different chromosomes including 9 and 14 were detected in 33% of the metaphases (Fig. 3, D and E)Citation . In tumor N1104, we detected a Robertsonian translocation involving chromosomes 2 and 18, rob(2;18), in over 90% of the cells with near-diploid complement and in about 10% of the near-tetraploid cells (Fig. 3, D and E)Citation . These cytogenetic data indicated both clonal and nonclonal NRTs in these HCCs.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. SKY analysis of primary HCC cells. In A, chromosome spreads were prepared from HCC cells (N1029 and N1104) derived from PARP-/-Ku80+/- mice. A representative metaphase showing the NRT between chromosomes 11 and 19 [t(11;19)] and the Robertsonian translocation involving the two chromosome 1 homologues, [rob(1;1)]. B, the translocation chromosomes in the metaphase shown in A, visualized in display colors (middle row), inverted DAPI (left row), and after spectra-based classification in pseudocolors (right row). C, confirmation of the chromosomal origin of the t(11;19) using chromosomes 11- (green) and 19- (red) specific painting probes. D, chromosomal aberrations detected in other metaphases from tumors N1104 [rob(2;18)], and N1029 [rob(1;2)], and a small acentromeric marker originating from chromosome 14. E, summary of chromosomal translocations and aberrations in primary HCC cells, N1029 and N1104. Ploidy of the tumor cells was determined by scoring at least 50 chromosome spreads.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although PARP-1 and Ku80 mutant mice are viable, PARP-1/Ku80 double null mutation causes early embryonic lethality, suggesting a synergistic role between PARP-1 and Ku80 in developmentally essential processes, most likely in DNA damage-mediated cellular responses such as DNA damage signaling and repair. The absence of both molecules leads to the accumulation of unrepaired chromosome breaks, which renders the embryonic cells susceptible to apoptosis. In this regard, it is interesting to note that PARP-1 null mutation in mice lacking ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) causes early embryonic lethality most likely caused by increased apoptosis (33) . In addition, it is also possible that the accumulation of chromosome damage in cells deficient in both PARP-1 and DNA-PK pathways may compromise cell proliferation. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that PARP-1+/-Ku80-/- mice exhibited severe growth retardation compared with PARP-1+/+Ku80-/- mice, and the majority of these mice died shortly after birth or before weaning.4 The survivors at weaning were ~40% of the bodyweight of their wild-type, and ~65% the bodyweight of their PARP-1+/+Ku80-/- littermates, throughout their life, reminiscent of small body sizes of PARP-1-/- SCID mice (15) . These observations indicate that functional synergy between DNA damage-signaling molecules is essential for embryonic development.

Although PARP-1 mutant mice did not show development of spontaneous tumors in previous studies (6, 7, 8) , PARP-1 null mice showed an enhanced tumor susceptibility in the SCID background (15) . In addition, it has recently been shown that there is an increase in the formation of sarcomas and adenomas when PARP-1 mutant mice are treated with nitrosamine (34) . PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ mice in the present study exhibited a relatively high frequency (28%) of liver lesions, suggesting that after sequential intercrossing of PARP-1-/- mice, presumably having eliminated the potential interference by genetic background, the colony becomes predisposed to liver malignancy. Although we cannot formally rule out the possibility that a modifier locus linked to the PARP-1 knockout allele contributes to HCC development, several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that PARP-1 may be a limiting factor for hepatocyte transformation. For example, the susceptibility of PARP-1 null mice to liver lesions has also been observed in a 129/Sv background after multiple intercrosses of the PARP-1-/- genotype.4 In addition, the inhibition of PARP-1 activity by 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) enhances liver carcinogenesis in rats induced by diethylnitrosamine (35) or phenobarbital (36) . This notion is also supported by the observation that male rats fed with a niacin-deficient diet, resulting in low PARP-1 activity, are susceptible to HCC (37) . Our preliminary data have also shown that PARP-1-/- mice are susceptible to diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumors.4 Finally, because the liver is the major detoxification organ that is constantly exposed to genotoxic agents and metabolites, it is plausible that a proficient DNA repair machinery would be critical to prevent accumulation of genetic mutations in tumor suppressors and oncogenes.

Strikingly, PARP-1-/- mice, carrying a heterozygous mutation of Ku80, exhibit enhanced HCC formation as reflected by the 60% incidence in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- mice compared with 28% in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+ genotype. This is apparently consistent with the observation that haplo-insufficiency of another NHEJ molecule Lig4 induces soft tissue sarcomas in Ink4a/arf-/- mice (38) . These findings are in agreement with the notion that the compromised NHEJ activity induces tumor development in murine models as well as in humans (reviewed in 39 , 40 ). Although mutations of components of the NHEJ pathway cause lymphoid malignancy (Ku80 in Ref. 22 , 24 ; DNA-PKcs in Ref. 15 , 41 , 42 ; Lig4, in Ref. 43 ; and XRCC4 in Ref. 44 ) and soft tissue sarcomas (Lig4 in Ref. 38 ), Ku80 heterozygosity promotes the malignant transformation of hepatocytes. All of these data point to NHEJ activity as possibly playing an important role in suppressing the malignancy of various cell origins.

One of the hallmarks of malignant transformation is genomic instability caused by mutations in genome caretaker genes, which promotes a wide range of genetic mutations, chromosome deletion and translocations, gene amplification, and aneuploidy (1, 2, 3) . Because PARP-1 and Ku80 function in DNA repair and recombination and telomere regulation as well as in chromosome stabilization (9 , 12 , 13 , 21, 22, 23) , both molecules can synergistically maintain telomere function (see Ref. 14 ) and minimize aberrant chromosome end-joining, and, thereby, suppress tumorigenesis. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that an increased frequency of chromosome end-to-end fusions and fragmentations/breaks was found in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/- MEFs, when compared with that observed in PARP-1-/-Ku80+/+, PARP-1+/+Ku80+/- and PARP-1+/-Ku80+/- cells (see Table 1Citation ). Moreover, our SKY analysis has shown that primary HCC cells derived from PARP-1/Ku80 double mutant mice exhibit frequent end-to-end fusions, NRTs, and Robertsonian-like configurations, as well as a high degree of fragmentation. A plausible explanation for these cytogenetic alterations is that the persistence and aberrant repair of double-strand breaks caused by reduced Ku80 activity and PARP-1 mutation provide substrates for the end-joining of chromosomes, the quality of which is otherwise monitored by the NHEJ machinery (2) . On the other hand, because PARP-1 is proposed to be an anti-recombinogenic factor (4) and PARP-1-/- cells exhibit a high degree of SCE (7 , 9) , this elevated recombinogenic activity induced by PARP-1 deficiency may facilitate aberrant joining of chromosome ends stalled by Ku80 deficiency leading to chromosomal translocations and fusions.

Although the functional alterations and phenotypical consequences of genes at break/fusion points remain to be investigated, we were able to show a high frequency of E-cadherin and ß-catenin alterations in HCCs of these double mutant mice. The activation of oncogenes or loss of inhibitory effect mediated by adhesion molecules has been proposed in neoplastic transformation and tumor progression (30) . In this regard, we found frequent down-regulation or loss of E-cadherin expression in these HCCs (see Fig. 2Citation ). These data are consistent with the notion that down-regulation or loss of E-cadherin is involved in tumor progression in animal models and human samples (30) . Moreover, specific gene mutations, such as those in ß-catenin, render hepatocytes susceptible to a selective growth advantage leading to cancer (32) .

These HCCs, prevalent in males and exhibiting a typical multistage progression characterized by the gradual loss of E-cadherin and the nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin, as well as chromosome translocations and fragmentations, are reminiscent of human HCC (31 , 32 , 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50) . Cytogenetic studies of human HCC have revealed frequent abnormalities in chromosome 1q, such as translocation, trisomy, or amplification (45 , 47 , 51) and, also, loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 1q42–43 and 2q35–37 in human HCC (52 , 53) . These studies imply that HCC-susceptible genes may localize at chromosome 1q and/or 2q. It is interesting to note that PARP-1 and Ku80 are located at human chromosome 1q41–42 (54) and 2q33–34 (55) , respectively. However, further investigation is required on whether the imbalance or loss of chromosome 1q may alter human PARP-1 gene expression or its ADP-ribosylation activity, and whether loss of heterozygosity of 2q35–37 in humans may lead to Ku80 deficiency, together with PARP-1 dysfunction, contributing to HCC formation.

HCC is one of the most common human malignant tumors in the world. Although infections by hepatitis B and C viruses, excessive alcohol intake, and exposure to aflatoxin B1 are major etiological factors for liver cancer, the molecular changes leading to hepatocyte transformation and cancer development remain largely unknown, partly because of the limited animal models available. The present study has demonstrated the interaction of PARP-1 and Ku80 as genome caretakers in suppressing liver tumorigenesis and the role that the NHEJ pathway plays in suppressing tumorigenesis. The high incidence of liver tumors (60%) in PARP-1-deficient Ku80+/- mice is associated with the molecular and genetic alterations that often occur in human HCC; therefore, these mice represent a potential model for human HCC, which would allow the exploration of the molecular and genetic mechanism of HCC and of the possible applications in developing therapeutic strategies.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. David Roth, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and Paul Hasty, Lexicon Genetics Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, for providing Ku80 knockout mice. We are also grateful to Dominique Galendo, Christelle Granier, Nicole Lyandrat, and Anne-Marie Camus-Randon for the maintenance of the animal colonies and technical assistance. Further thanks are due to Dr. Lucien Frappart for histopathological examination and Dr. Cristina Montagna, Bethesda, Maryland, for providing the chromosome-specific probes. We also thank Drs. Alain Barbin, Zdenko Herceg, and Ciaran Morrison for their critical comments, and Eve El-Akroud for editing the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This research and Z-Q. W.’s laboratory are supported by the Association for International Cancer Research, United Kingdom, and by the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, France. The work by M. P. H. and P. M. L. for this study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Terry Fox Run. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert-Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France. Phone: 33-4-72-73-8510; Fax: 33-4-72-73-8329; E-mail: zqwang{at}iarc.fr Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; SCE, sister chromatid exchange; SCID, severe combined immunodeficient; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; DNA-PKcs, catalytic subunit of DNA-PK; SSCP, single-strand conformational polymorphism; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; SKY, spectral karyotyping; NRT, nonreciprocal translocation; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization. Back

4 W-M. Tong and Z-Q. Wang, unpublished observations. Back

Received 5/29/02. Accepted 10/ 4/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lengauer C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature (Lond.), 396: 643-649, 1998.[Medline]
  2. Khanna K. K., Jackson S. P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet., 27: 247-254, 2001.[Medline]
  3. Loeb L. A. A mutator phenotype in cancer. Cancer Res., 61: 3230-3239, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lindahl T., Satoh M. S., Poirier G. G., Klungland A. Post-translational modification of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase induced by DNA strand breaks. Trends Biochem. Sci., 20: 405-411, 1995.[Medline]
  5. Herceg Z., Wang Z-Q. Functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) in DNA repair, genomic integrity and cell death. Mutat. Res., 477: 97-110, 2001.[Medline]
  6. Wang Z-Q., Auer B., Stingl L., Berghammer H., Haidacher D., Schweiger M., Wagner E. F. Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease. Genes Dev., 9: 509-520, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ménissier-de Murcia J., Niedergang C., Trucco C., Ricoul M., Dutrillaux B., Mark M., Oliver F. J., Masson M., Dierich A., LeMeur M., Walztinger C., Chambon P., de Murcia G. Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 7303-7307, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Masutani M., Suzuki H., Kamada N., Watanabe M., Ueda O., Nozaki T., Jishage K., Watanabe T., Sugimoto T., Nakagama H., Ochiya T., Sugimura T. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene disruption conferred mice resistant to streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 2301-2304, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wang Z-Q., Stingl L., Morrison C., Jantsch M., Los M., Schulze-Osthoff K., Wagner E. F. PARP is important for genomic stability but dispensable in apoptosis. Genes Dev., 11: 2347-2358, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tong W. M., Galendo D., Wang Z-Q. Role of DNA break-sensing molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in cellular function and radiation toxicity. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 65: 583-591, 2000.[Medline]
  11. Tong W. M., Cortes U., Wang Z-Q. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: a guardian angel protecting genome and suppressing tumorigenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Rev. Cancer, 1552: 27-37, 2001.[Medline]
  12. d’Adda di Fagagna F., Hande M. P., Tong W. M., Lansdorp P. M., Wang Z-Q., Jackson S. P. Functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in controlling telomere length and chromosomal stability. Nat. Genet., 23: 76-80, 1999.[Medline]
  13. Simbulan-Rosenthal C. M., Haddad B. R., Rosenthal D. S., Weaver Z., Coleman A., Luo R., Young H. M., Wang Z-Q., Ried T., Smulson M. E. Chromosomal aberrations in PARP(-/-) mice: genome stabilization in immortalized cells by reintroduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 13191-13196, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tong W. M., Hande M. P., Lansdorp P. M., Wang Z-Q. DNA strand break-sensing molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cooperates with p53 in telomere function, chromosome stability, and tumor suppression. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21: 4046-4054, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Morrison C., Smith G. C., Stingl L., Jackson S. P., Wagner E. F., Wang Z-Q. Genetic interaction between PARP-1 and DNA-PK in V(D)J recombination and tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet., 17: 479-482, 1997.[Medline]
  16. Smith G. C. M., Jackson S. P. The DNA-dependent protein kinase. Genes Dev., 13: 916-934, 1999.[Free Full Text]
  17. Zhu C., Bogue M. A., Lim D. S., Hasty P., Roth D. B. Ku86-deficeint mice exhibit severe combined immunodeficiency and defective processing of V(D)J recombination intermediates. Cell, 86: 379-389, 1996.[Medline]
  18. Nussenzweig A., Chen C., da Costa Soares V., Sanchez M., Sokol K., Nussenzweig M. C., Li G. C. Requirement for Ku80 in growth and immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination. Nature (Lond.), 382: 551-555, 1996.[Medline]
  19. Nussenzweig A., Sokol K., Burgman P., Li L., Li G. C. Hypersensitivity of Ku80-deficient cell lines and mice to DNA damage: the effects of ionizing radiation on growth, survival, and development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 13588-13593, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wachsberger P. R., Li W. H., Guo M., Chen D., Cheong N., Ling C. C., Li G., Iliakis G. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in Ku80-deficient mouse fibroblasts. Radiat. Res., 151: 398-407, 1999.[Medline]
  21. Bailey S. M., Meyne J., Chen D. J., Kurimasa A., Li G. C., Lehnert B. E., Goodwin E. H. DNA double-strand break repair proteins are required to cap the ends of mammalian chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 14899-14904, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Difilippantonio M. J., Zhu J., Chen H. T., Meffre E., Nussenzweig M. C., Max E. E., Ried T., Nussenzweig A. DNA repair protein Ku80 suppresses chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation. Nature (Lond.), 404: 510-514, 2000.[Medline]
  23. d’Adda di Fagagna F., Hande M. P., Tong W. M., Roth D., Lansdorp P. M., Wang Z-Q., Jackson S. P. Effects of DNA non-homologous end-joining factors on telomere length and chromosomal stability in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol., 11: 1192-1196, 2001.[Medline]
  24. Lim D. S., Vogel H., Willerford D. M., Sands A. T., Platt K. A., Hasty P. Analysis of Ku80-mutant mice and cells with deficient levels of p53. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 3772-3780, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. D’Silva I., Pelletier J. D., Lagueux J., D’Amours D., Claudhry M. A., Weinfeld M., Lee-Miller S. P., Poirier G. G. Relative affinities of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and DNA-dependent protein kinase for DNA stand interruptions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1430: 119-126, 1999.[Medline]
  26. Ariumi Y., Masutani M., Coplend T. D., Mimori T., Sugimura T., Shimotohno K., Ueda K., Hatanaka M., Noda M. Suppression of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity by DNA-dependent protein kinase in vitro. Oncogene, 18: 4616-4625, 1999.[Medline]
  27. Vogel H., Lim D. S., Karsenty G., Finegold M., Hasty P. Deletion of Ku86 cause early onset of senescence in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 10770-10775, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Huang H., Mahler-Araujo B. M., Sankila A., Chimelli L., Yonekawa Y., Kleihues P., Ohgaki H. APC mutations in sporadic medulloblastomas. Am. J. Pathol., 156: 433-437, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Haddad B. R., Schröck E., Meck J., Cowan J., Young H., Ferguson-Smith M. A., du Manoir S., Ried T. dentification of de novo chromosomal markers and derivatives by spectral karyotyping (SKY). Hum. Genet., 103: 619-625, 1998.[Medline]
  30. Christofori G., Semb H. The role of the cell-adhesion molecule E-cadherin as a tumour-suppressor gene. Trends Biochem. Sci., 24: 73-76, 1999.[Medline]
  31. Terris B., Pineau P., Bregeaud L., Valla D., Belghiti J., Tiollais P., Degott C., Dejean A. Close correlation between ß-catenin gene alterations and nuclear accumulation of the protein in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene, 18: 6583-6588, 1999.[Medline]
  32. Nhieu J. T., Renard C. A., Wei Y., Cherqui D., Zafrani E. S., Buendia M. A. Nuclear accumulation of mutated ß-catenin in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with increased cell proliferation. Am. J. Pathol., 155: 703-710, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ménissier-de Murcia J., Mark M., Wendling O., Wynshaw-Boris A., de Murcia G. Early embryonic lethality in PARP-1 Atm double-mutant mice suggests a functional synergy in cell proliferation during development. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21: 1828-1832, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Tsutsumi M., Masutani M., Nozaki T., Kusuoka O., Tsujiuchi T., Nakagama H., Suzuki H., Konishi Y., Sugimura T. Increased susceptibility of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 knockout mice to nitrosamine carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 22: 1-3, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Takahashi S., Nakae D., Yokose Y., Emi Y., Denda A., Mikami S., Ohnishi T., Konishi Y. Enhancement of DEN initiation of liver carcinogenesis by inhibitors of NAD+ ADP ribosyl transferase in rats. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 5: 901-906, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tsujiuchi T., Tsutsumi M., Denda A., Kondoh S., Nakae D., Maruyama H., Konishi Y. Possible involvement of poly ADP-ribosylation in phenobarbital promotion of rat hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 11: 1783-1787, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Henning S. M., Swendseid M. E., Coulson W. F. Male rats fed methyl- and folate-deficient diets with or without niacin develop hepatic carcinomas associated with decreased tissue NAD concentrations and altered poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. J. Nutr., 127: 30-36, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sharpless N. E., Ferguson D. O., O’Hagan R. C., Castrillon D. H., Lee C., Farazi P. A., Alson S., Fleming J., Morton C. C., Frank K., Chin L., Alt F. W., DePinho R. A. Impaired nonhomologous end-joining provokes soft tissue sarcomas harboring chromosomal translocations, amplifications, and deletions. Mol. Cell, 8: 1187-1196, 2001.[Medline]
  39. Ferguson D. O., Alt F. W. DNA double strand break repair and chromosomal translocation: lessons from animal models. Oncogene, 20: 5572-5579, 2001.[Medline]
  40. Pierce A. J., Stark J. M., Araujo F. D., Moynahan M. E., Berwick M., Jasin M. Double-strand breaks and tumorigenesis. Trends Cell Biol., 11: S52-S59, 2001.[Medline]
  41. Guidos C. J., Williams C. J., Grandal I., Knowles G., Huang M. T., Danska J. S. V(D)J recombination activates a p53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in scid lymphocyte precursors. Genes Dev., 10: 2038-2054, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Nacht M., Strasser A., Chan Y. R., Harris A. W., Schlissel M., Bronson R. T., Jacks T. Mutations in the p53 and SCID genes cooperate in tumorigenesis. Genes Dev., 10: 2055-2066, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Frank K. M., Sharpless N. E., Gao Y., Sekiguchi J. M., Ferguson D. O., Zhu C., Manis J. P., Horner J., DePinho R. A., Alt F. W. DNA ligase IV deficiency in mice leads to defective neurogenesis and embryonic lethality via the p53 pathway. Mol. Cell, 5: 993-1002, 2000.[Medline]
  44. Gao Y., Ferguson D. O., Xie W., Manis J. P., Sekiguchi J., Frank K. M., Chaudhuri J., Horner J., DePinho R. A., Alt F. W. Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature (Lond.), 404: 897-900, 2000.[Medline]
  45. Marchio A., Meddeb M., Pineau P., Danglot G., Tiollais P., Bernheim A., Dejean A. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 18: 59-65, 1997.[Medline]
  46. Chan J. Y. H., Lo K-W., Li H-M., Liew C. T. Molecular aspects Leong A. S. Y. Liew C. T. Lau J. W. Y. Johnson P. J. eds. . Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Contemporary Diagnosis, Investigation and Management, 131-146, Arnold Press London 1999.
  47. Wong N., Lai P., Pang E., Leung T. W., Lau J. W., Johnson P. J. A comprehensive karyotypic study on human hepatocellular carcinoma by spectral karyotyping. Hepatology, 32: 1060-1068, 2000.[Medline]
  48. de La Coste A., Romagnolo B., Billuart P., Renard C. A., Buendia M. A., Soubrane O., Fabre M., Chelly J., Beldjord C., Kahn A., Perret C. Somatic mutations of the ß-catenin gene are frequent in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 8847-8851, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Polakis P. The oncogenic activation of ß-catenin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 9: 15-21, 1999.[Medline]
  50. Matsumura T., Makino R., Mitamura K. Frequent down-regulation of E-cadherin by genetic and epigenetic changes in the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 594-599, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Piao Z., Park C., Park J. H., Kim H. Allelotype analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer, 75: 29-33, 1998.[Medline]
  52. Werner M., Nolte M., Georgii A., Klempnauer J. Chromosome 1 abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 66: 130 1993.[Medline]
  53. Nagai H., Pineau P., Tiollais P., Buendia M. A., Dejean A. Comprehensive allelotyping of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene, 14: 2927-2933, 1997.[Medline]
  54. Chernet B. W., McBride O. W., Chen D., Alkhatib H., Bhatia K. G., Hensley P., Smulson M. E. cDNA sequence, protein structure, and chromosomal location of human gene for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 8370-8374, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Blunt T., Taccioli G. E., Priestley A., Hafezparast M., McMillan T., Liu J., Cole C. C., White J., Alt F. W., Jackson S. P., Schurr E., Lehmann A. R., Jeggo P. A. A YAC contig encompassing the XRCC5 (Ku80) DNA repair gene and complementation defective cells by YAC protoplast fusion. Genomics, 30: 320-328, 1995.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, and J. M. Kaminski
The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 13 - 22.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Tanori, M. Mancuso, E. Pasquali, S. Leonardi, S. Rebessi, V. Di Majo, M.-N. Guilly, F. Giangaspero, V. Covelli, S. Pazzaglia, et al.
PARP-1 cooperates with Ptc1 to suppress medulloblastoma and basal cell carcinoma
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2008; 29(10): 1911 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Decottignies
Microhomology-Mediated End Joining in Fission Yeast Is Repressed by Pku70 and Relies on Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1403 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Ratnam and J. A. Low
Current Development of Clinical Inhibitors of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Oncology
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1383 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Wang, W. Wu, W. Wu, B. Rosidi, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and G. Iliakis
PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways
Nucleic Acids Res., December 4, 2006; 34(21): 6170 - 6182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
D. Harris, Z. Zhang, B. Chaubey, and V. N. Pandey
Identification of Cellular Factors Associated with the 3'-Nontranslated Region of the Hepatitis C Virus Genome
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1006 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Audebert, B. Salles, and P. Calsou
Involvement of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA Ligase III in an Alternative Route for DNA Double-strand Breaks Rejoining
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55117 - 55126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Ohsaki, K. Ueda, S. Sakakibara, E. Do, K. Yada, and K. Yamanishi
Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Binds to Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) Terminal Repeat Sequence and Modulates KSHV Replication in Latency
J. Virol., September 15, 2004; 78(18): 9936 - 9946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Susse, C.-J. Scholz, A. Burkle, and L. Wiesmuller
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) and p53 independently function in regulating double-strand break repair in primate cells
Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2004; 32(2): 669 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Dumon-Jones, P.-O. Frappart, W.-M. Tong, G. Sajithlal, W. Hulla, G. Schmid, Z. Herceg, M. Digweed, and Z.-Q. Wang
Nbn Heterozygosity Renders Mice Susceptible to Tumor Formation and Ionizing Radiation-Induced Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7263 - 7269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
P. Bertolino, W.-M. Tong, D. Galendo, Z.-Q. Wang, and C.-X. Zhang
Heterozygous Men1 Mutant Mice Develop a Range of Endocrine Tumors Mimicking Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2003; 17(9): 1880 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Bertolino, W.-M. Tong, P. L. Herrera, H. Casse, C. X. Zhang, and Z.-Q. Wang
Pancreatic {beta}-Cell-specific Ablation of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) Gene Causes Full Penetrance of Insulinoma Development in Mice
Cancer Res., August 15, 2003; 63(16): 4836 - 4841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tong, W.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.-Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tong, W.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.-Q.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online