This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brose, M. S. Articles by Weber, B. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brose, M. S. Articles by Weber, B. L.

BRAF and RAS Mutations in Human Lung Cancer and Melanoma¹

Department of Medicine [M. S. B., R. G., S. M. A., B. L. W.], Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute [M. S. B., P. V., M. K., I. R., R. G., B. L. W.], University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center; Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [M. F.]; Department of Pathology, VA Medical Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 [E. E., M. H.]; The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, CD10 1SA United Kingdom [H. D., C. C., G. B., P. S., P. A. F., R. W., M. R. S.]; The Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, the Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390 [J. M.]; Royal Brompton Hospital, London, SW3 GNP United Kingdom [A. N.]; and Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [J. A. R.]

	ABSTRACT

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
BRAF encodes a RAS-regulated kinase that mediates cell growth and malignant transformation kinase pathway activation. Recently, we have identified activating BRAF mutations in 66% of melanomas and a smaller percentage of many other human cancers. To determine whether BRAF mutations account for the MAP kinase pathway activation common in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) and to extend the initial findings in melanoma, we screened DNA from 179 NSCLCs and 35 melanomas for BRAF mutations (exons 11 and 15). We identified BRAF mutations in 5 NSCLCs (3%; one V599 and four non-V599) and 22 melanomas (63%; 21 V599 and 1 non-V599). Three BRAF mutations identified in this study are novel, altering residues important in AKT-mediated BRAF phosphorylation and suggesting that disruption of AKT-induced BRAF inhibition can play a role in malignant transformation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of mutations documenting this interaction in human cancers. Although >90% of BRAF mutations in melanoma involve codon 599 (57 of 60), 8 of 9 BRAF mutations reported to date in NSCLC are non-V599 (89%; P < 10^-7), strongly suggesting that BRAF mutations in NSCLC are qualitatively different from those in melanoma; thus, there may be therapeutic differences between lung cancer and melanoma in response to RAF inhibitors. Although uncommon, BRAF mutations in human lung cancers may identify a subset of tumors sensitive to targeted therapy.

	INTRODUCTION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Identification of gene mutations in human cancers can lead to the development of effective targeted therapies (1) . We reported recently that activating BRAF mutations are present in 66% of melanomas and a small percentage of NSCLC³ cell lines (2) . In melanoma, most BRAF mutations involved codon 599 in the activation segment of the kinase domain (exon 15; Fig. 1 ); however, four of four BRAF mutations found in NSCLCs were non-V599 (exons 11 and 15). Interestingly, none of the 3 of 43 cancer cell lines with both BRAF and RAS mutations had a codon 599 BRAF mutation [one each in NSCLC (NRAS and Q61K), colorectal (KRAS and G13D), and ovarian cancer lines (KRAS and G13D; Ref. 2 )]. This (2) and a subsequent report (3) provide evidence that BRAF kinase mutations are present in 10% of colon cancers overall and in 31% of mismatch repair-deficient tumors (P < 10^-6; Ref. 3 ). In the latter series of colon cancers, KRAS and BRAF mutations were mutually exclusive (P < 10^-6); our current and previous series have inadequate power to evaluate this interaction.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of BRAF showing the location of the G-loop (exon 11) and activation segment (exon 15) of the kinase domain. Additionally shown are the invariant glycine residues that make up the backbone of the glycine loop (G463, G465, and G468) and phosphorylation sites in the activation segment (T598 and T601). AKT-phosphorylated residues are as shown (S364, S428, and T439). Codon 599 and the Thr439 AKT phosphorylation site are highlighted in red.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
DNA Isolation.
DNA was obtained from 35 early passage melanoma cell lines, 2 snap-frozen metastatic melanomas, and 139 snap-frozen lung tumors (>40% tumor) using the Wizard Genomic Purification Kit (Promega). DNA from 165 paraffin-embedded lung tumor specimens was prepared from 10 x 30-µm sections after macrodissection, resulting in selection of 90% tumor cells. DNA was isolated after xylene extraction and proteinase K digestion as described previously (6) .

Mutation Screening and Confirmation.
Genomic DNA was screened for mutations using conformation-sensitive capillary electrophoresis as described previously (2) . The following intron-based PCR primers were designed to amplify the exons of interest and the associated splice junctions:

KRAS exon2:F-GTGTGACATGTTCTAATATAGTCA.

KRAS exon2:R-GAATGGTCCTGCACCAGTAA.

NRAS exon3:F-GGTGAAACCTGTTTGTTGGA.

NRAS exon3:R-AACCTAAAACCAACTCTTCCCA.

BRAF exon11:F-TCCCTCTCAGGCATAAGGTAA.

BRAF exon11:R-CGAACAGTGAATATTTCCTTTGAT.

BRAF exon15:F-TCATAATGCTTGCTCTGATAGGA.

BRAF exon15:R-GGCCAAAAATTTAATCAGTGGA.

The template consisted of 120 ng of genomic DNA. PCR reactions were performed using standard PCR conditions [95°C x 15 min; 95°C x 45 s, 56°C (RAS) or 58°C (BRAF) x 45 s, 72°C x 45 s, for 40 cycles; then 72°C x 10 min, 50-µl reactions] with fluorescence-labeled primers. We combined 3 µl of tumor PCR product and 3 µl of wild-type PCR product in a total volume of 30 µl of 1 x PCR buffer to ensure heteroduplex formation in the event of allele loss in a tumor. Heteroduplex formation was performed as follows: 96°C for 10 min, 72 cycles of 96°C for 20 s decreasing temperature by 0.5°C/cycle, followed by incubation at 60°C for 30 min, and then cooling to room temperature. The samples were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3100 automated capillary sequencer under semidenaturing conditions using polymer provided by ABI and optimized run conditions (2) . Data were captured using GeneScan to identify samples with a shift in peak migration relative to a wild-type control, indicating the presence of a putative sequence variation. PCR products selected by the presence of a heteroduplex shift were gel purified and sequenced on the ABI 3100 to confirm the presence of a mutation.

DNA was prepared from 292 NSCLCs, 12 neuroendocrine lung cancers, and 35 melanomas. Amplicons of all four exons (BRAF exons 11 and 15, KRAS exon 2, and NRAS exon 3) were obtained from 158 NSCLCs, 10 neuroendocrine lung cancers, and 33 melanomas (Table 1) . Data on both BRAF exons were available for 179 NSCLCs, 11 neuroendocrine lung cancers, and 35 melanomas (Table 1) . Mutation frequencies did not vary significantly when tumors lacking data on one BRAF exon were included in the analysis ("All results" versus "Complete Sets;" Fig. 2 ). Tumor DNA from failed reactions was repurified, and a minimum of three attempts was made to amplify the exon. Success rates using DNA from frozen tissue and cell lines were almost 100%, but amplification of DNA from archival material was inconsistent. Of the 165 paraffin-embedded lung tumors, 30 failed to yield any amplifiable DNA, and 54 yielded DNA that could not be amplified using at least one primer pair. In only three paraffin-embedded lung cancers, neither BRAF exon, but both RAS exons, amplified, suggesting that frequent large genomic deletions involving BRAF are an unlikely explanation for these results. PCR failures were not consistently attributed to a specific primer pair, suggesting they are a result of random cross-linking during fixation that interferes with primer annealing.

View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Frequency of BRAF mutations. Highlighted mutation frequencies are discussed in the Results and Discussion section.

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

In this series, we identified five NSCLCs with mutations in BRAF, only one of which involves V599. Taken together with data from the previous study (2) , we have identified nine BRAF mutations in NSCLCs, eight of which are non-V599 (P < 10^-7). These data provide a high level of statistical support to the hypothesis that BRAF-related tumorigenesis in NSCLC is qualitatively different from that in melanomas with codon 599 mutations, raising the possibility that therapeutic response to RAF inhibitors may be different in these two tumors types, despite the presence of activating BRAF mutations in both.

Of the 104 adenocarcinomas evaluable for both BRAF exons, two had novel mutations in exon 11. V458L is five codons upstream of the first glycine in the G-loop (Fig. 1) . It is possible that this leucine residue changes the conformation of the adjacent G-loop (2) , resulting in activation; however, this remains speculative. The second mutation, K438T, alters the basic residue next to a threonine phosphorylated by AKT (Fig. 1) . BRAF has three AKT phosphorylation sites: (a) Thr439 is one of two unique to BRAF; (b) the other being Ser428; and (c) Ser364 is conserved in RAF1 (Ref. 7 ; Fig. 1 ). In vitro alanine substitution at Thr439 leads to BRAF activation through loss of AKT-induced inhibition (7) , with progressively increased BRAF activity as the additional two sites are mutated. The inhibitory effect of AKT-induced phosphorylation on RAF1 also has been demonstrated (8) . Thus, K438T, as well as K438Q found in a melanoma as described below, is likely to inhibit AKT-dependent phosphorylation of the adjacent Thr439, as adjacent basic residues are commonly required in AKT Ser/Thr phosphorylation consensus sequences (9) . These data suggest that transformation-related BRAF activation may occur through multiple mechanisms and that mutations of Thr439, as well as the two additional AKT consensus sites (Ser364 and Ser428; Fig. 1 ; Ref. 10 ), could play a role in tumorigenesis. Although AKT-BRAF cross-talk has been documented in vitro, to our knowledge, this is the first report of mutations involving this interaction in human cancers.

Fourteen of 147 lung adenocarcinomas had KRAS mutations (Fig. 2) , all but one in codon 12, the exception being A18T, the significance of which is unknown. Constitutional DNA was not available from this patient; thus, a germ-line polymorphism cannot be excluded. The overall KRAS mutation frequency in this series of lung adenocarcinomas is 10%, lower than the 17% detected in NSCLCs in the previous series (2) and lower than the frequently cited rate of 30% (11 , 12) . Multiple studies suggest that the frequency of KRAS mutations in nonsmokers (and dogs) is in the range of 10% (11 , 13, 14, 15) . We have no information on the smoking status of the patients whose tumors were evaluated in our studies, but a bias toward young nonsmokers might occur because of various factors related to selectivity of referrals to a tertiary care hospital.

In the 117 SCC, we identified one novel mutation in exon 11 (T439P) and two mutations in exon 15 (L596V and V599E). As expected based on the existing literature, we did not identify RAS mutations in SCCs. The exon 15 BRAF mutations are both in the activation segment and cause BRAF activation (2) . However, the exon 11 mutation is novel. This mutation alters Thr439, an AKT phosphorylation site (described above), further supporting the suggestion that transformation-related BRAF activation may occur through multiple mechanisms.

No BRAF or KRAS mutations were identified in the 12 neuroendocrine lung cancers, but two had codon 65 NRAS mutations (20%). Analysis of this mutation in a melanoma (described below) suggests this mutation may not be transforming. There are few data in the literature on the prevalence of NRAS mutations in neuroendocrine lung cancers, and our series is small as well, but additional investigation may be warranted.

Data from the 35 early passage primary melanoma cell lines confirm our previous report that the majority of melanomas have BRAF mutations (63% in this series), predominantly V599 (20 of 22, 91%; Fig. 2 and Table 2 ; Ref. 2 ). One of the two non-V599 mutations is in exon 15 and is in the adjacent residue (K600E). The other non-V599 mutation is in exon 11 (K438Q), similar to the novel K438T mutation identified in a lung adenocarcinoma. This mutation results in substitution of Lys438, likely required for AKT phosphorylation of the adjacent Thr439, thus likely to be an activating mutation (7 , 8 , 10) .

No KRAS mutations and one NRAS mutation of unknown significance (S65C) were identified in the 35 melanomas. Specifically, no NRAS codon 61 mutations, reported in 15% of melanoma cell lines (16) , were identified. The codon 65 NRAS mutation was further investigated in three additional melanoma cell lines from the same individual, all derived from axillary lymph node metastases. This mutation (S65C) is not present in the primary tumor nor in a metastatic deposit sampled in June 1983 and is present in only one of two cell lines established from lymph node biopsies performed 2 months later. These data provide evidence that this mutation is not a germ-line polymorphism, nor did it contribute to malignant transformation in this tumor; whether it is important in disease progression is unknown.

In summary, we have confirmed the high prevalence of BRAF mutations in melanoma, shown that BRAF exon 11 and 15 mutations are not a common cause of the MAP kinase pathway activation in NSCLC, and identified four novel BRAF mutations. These mutations provide the first in vivo evidence that activation of BRAF through loss of AKT-induced inhibitory phosphorylation is associated with tumorigenesis, and studies to understand this relationship may uncover additional therapeutic targets. We provide strong statistical evidence that BRAF mutations in NSCLCs are qualitatively different that those in melanoma, with possible therapeutic implications when considering BRAF inhibitors. These results define the frequency of BRAF mutations in NSCLC (2–3%) and in melanomas (>60%). In both cases, future studies will determine whether these BRAF mutations represent promising new therapeutic drug targets for these chemoresistant tumors. Even if the BRAF mutations are rare, as in lung cancer, they may identify a tumor sensitive to targeted therapy, resulting in significantly improved outcomes for the patients that harbor them.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ Supported by funding from the Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute (to B. L. W.) and Lung Cancer SPORE P50 CA70907 (to J. M.). M. Brose is a General Motors Cancer Research Scholar.

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, BRB II/II, Room 514, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: (215) 898-0247; E-mail: weberb{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

³ The abbreviations used are: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Received 10/ 3/02. Accepted 10/15/02.

	REFERENCES

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Adjei A. A. Blocking oncogenic Ras signaling for cancer therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 93: 1062-1074, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Davies H., Bignell G. R., Cox C., Stephens P., Edkins S., Clegg S., Teague J., Woffendin H., Garnett M. J., Bottomley W., Davis N., Dicks E., Ewing R., Floyd Y., Gray K., Hall S., Hawes R., Hughes J., Kosmidou V., Menzies A., Mould C., Parker A., Stevens C., Watt S., Hooper S., Wilson R., Jayatilake H., Gusterson B. A., Cooper C., Shipley J., Hargrave D., Pritchard-Jones K., Maitland N., Chenevix-Trench G., Riggins G. J., Bigner D. D., Palmieri G., Cossu A., Flanagan A., Nicholson A., Ho J. W., Leung S. Y., Yuen S. T., Weber B. L., Seigler H. F., Darrow T. L., Paterson H., Marais R., Marshall C. J., Wooster R., Stratton M. R., Futreal P. A. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature, 417: 949-954, 2002.[Medline]
3. Rajagpalan H., Bardelli A., Lengauer C., Kinzler K., Vogelstein B., Velculescue V. RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature, 418: 934 2002.[Medline]
4. Muneer S. eds. . MAP Kinase and PP2A in Cancer Pathogenesis, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX 2002.
5. Satyamoorthy, K., Li, G., Gerrero, M. R., Brose, M. S., Weber, B. L., van Belle, P., Elder, D. E., and Herlyn, M. Constitutive MAP kinase activation in melanoma is mediated by BRAF mutations and autocrine growth factor stimulation, submitted for publication, 2002.
6. Chamberlain J. S., Boehnke M., Frank T. S., Kiousis S., Xu J., Guo S. W., Hauser E. R., Norum R. A., Helmbold E. A., Markel D. S., et al BRCA1 maps proximal to D17S579 on chromosome 17q21 by genetic analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 52: 792-798, 1993.[Medline]
7. Guan K. L., Figueroa C., Brtva T. R., Zhu T., Taylor J., Barber T. D., Vojtek A. B. Negative regulation of the serine/threonine kinase B-Raf by Akt. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 27354-27359, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Zimmermann S., Moelling K. Phosphorylation and regulation of Raf by Akt (protein kinase B). Science, 286: 1741-1744, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Obata T., Yaffe M. B., Leparc G. G., Piro E. T., Maegawa H., Kashiwagi A., Kikkawa R., Cantley L. C. Peptide and protein library screening defines optimal substrate motifs for AKT/PKB. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 36108-36115, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Chong H., Lee J., Guan K. L. Positive and negative regulation of Raf kinase activity and function by phosphorylation. EMBO J., 20: 3716-3727, 2001.[Medline]
11. Rodenhuis S., Slebos R. J., Boot A. J., Evers S. G., Mooi W. J., Wagenaar S. S., van Bodegom P. C., Bos J. L. Incidence and possible clinical significance of K-ras oncogene activation in adenocarcinoma of the human lung. Cancer Res., 48: 5738-5741, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ferretti G., Curigliano G., Pastorino U., Cittadini A., Flamini G., Calabro M. G., De Pas T., Orlando L., Mandala M., Colleoni M., Spaggiari L., Granone P. L., Pagliari G., de Braud F., Fazio N., Goldhirsch A. Detection by denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis of tumor-specific mutations in biopsies and relative bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 2393-2400, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Vahakangas K. H., Bennett W. P., Castren K., Welsh J. A., Khan M. A., Blomeke B., Alavanja M. C., Harris C. C. p53 and K-ras mutations in lung cancers from former and never-smoking women. Cancer Res., 61: 4350-4356, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Slebos R. J., Hruban R. H., Dalesio O., Mooi W. J., Offerhaus G. J., Rodenhuis S. Relationship between K-ras oncogene activation and smoking in adenocarcinoma of the human lung. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 83: 1024-1027, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Griffey S. M., Kraegel S. A., Madewell B. R. Rapid detection of K-ras gene mutations in canine lung cancer using single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis. Carcinogenesis, 19: 959-963, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Tsao H., Zhang X., Fowlkes K., Haluska F. G. Relative reciprocity of NRAS and PTEN/MMAC1 alterations in cutaneous melanoma cell lines. Cancer Res., 60: 1800-1804, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Tran, C. D. Smith, M. Kester, and G. P. Robertson Combining Nanoliposomal Ceramide with Sorafenib Synergistically Inhibits Melanoma and Breast Cancer Cell Survival to Decrease Tumor Development Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3571 - 3581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cheung, A. Sharma, S. V. Madhunapantula, and G. P. Robertson Akt3 and Mutant V600EB-Raf Cooperate to Promote Early Melanoma Development Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3429 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B. Friday and A. A. Adjei Advances in Targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade with MEK Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 342 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Maat, E. Kilic, G. P. M. Luyten, A. de Klein, M. J. Jager, N. A. Gruis, and P. A. Van der Velden Pyrophosphorolysis Detects B-RAF Mutations in Primary Uveal Melanoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sabatino, Y. Zhao, S. Voiculescu, A. Monaco, P. Robbins, L. Karai, B. J. Nickoloff, M. Maio, S. Selleri, F. M. Marincola, et al. Conservation of Genetic Alterations in Recurrent Melanoma Supports the Melanoma Stem Cell Hypothesis Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 122 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Haass, K. Sproesser, T. K. Nguyen, R. Contractor, C. A. Medina, K. L. Nathanson, M. Herlyn, and K. S.M. Smalley The Mitogen-Activated Protein/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase Inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) Induces Growth Arrest in Melanoma Cells and Tumor Regression When Combined with Docetaxel Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 230 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-E. Legrier, C.-P. H. Yang, H.-G. Yan, L. Lopez-Barcons, S. M. Keller, R. Perez-Soler, S. B. Horwitz, and H. M. McDaid Targeting Protein Translation in Human Non Small Cell Lung Cancer via Combined MEK and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Suppression Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11300 - 11308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Solit, E. Santos, C. A. Pratilas, J. Lobo, M. Moroz, S. Cai, R. Blasberg, J. Sebolt-Leopold, S. Larson, and N. Rosen 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography Is a Sensitive Method for Imaging the Response of BRAF-Dependent Tumors to MEK Inhibition Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11463 - 11469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Henriquez, C. Janssen, E. G. Kemp, and F. Roberts The T1799A BRAF Mutation Is Present in Iris Melanoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 4897 - 4900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. C. Henderson, M. J. Fredrick, and G. L. Clayman Differential Responses of Human Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cell Lines Carrying the RET/PTC1 Rearrangement or a BRAF Mutation to MEK1/2 Inhibitors Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2007; 133(8): 810 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Davies, A. Logie, J. S. McKay, P. Martin, S. Steele, R. Jenkins, M. Cockerill, S. Cartlidge, and P. D. Smith AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2209 - 2219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Liang, A. Sharma, H.-H. Peng, G. Robertson, and C. Dong Targeting Mutant (V600E) B-Raf in Melanoma Interrupts Immunoediting of Leukocyte Functions and Melanoma Extravasation Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5814 - 5820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Fecher, S. D. Cummings, M. J. Keefe, and R. M. Alani Toward a Molecular Classification of Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2007; 25(12): 1606 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yancovitz, J. Yoon, M. Mikhail, W. Gai, R. L. Shapiro, R. S. Berman, A. C. Pavlick, P. B. Chapman, I. Osman, and D. Polsky Detection of Mutant BRAF Alleles in the Plasma of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma J. Mol. Diagn., April 1, 2007; 9(2): 178 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Strumberg, J. W. Clark, A. Awada, M. J. Moore, H. Richly, A. Hendlisz, H. W. Hirte, J. P. Eder, H.-J. Lenz, and B. Schwartz Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Sorafenib: A Review of Four Phase I Trials in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors Oncologist, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 426 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Haigis, I. I. Wistuba, and J. M. Kurie Lung premalignancy induced by mutant B-Raf, what is thy fate? To senesce or not to senesce, that is the question Genes & Dev., February 15, 2007; 21(4): 361 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Mhaidat, X. D. Zhang, C. C. Jiang, and P. Hersey Docetaxel-Induced Apoptosis of Human Melanoma Is Mediated by Activation of c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase and Inhibited by the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Pathway Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 13(4): 1308 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dankort, E. Filenova, M. Collado, M. Serrano, K. Jones, and M. McMahon A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors Genes & Dev., February 15, 2007; 21(4): 379 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Riely, K. A. Politi, V. A. Miller, and W. Pao Update on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7232 - 7241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Murphy, S. Makonnen, W. Lassoued, M. D. Feldman, C. Carter, and W. M.F. Lee Inhibition of Tumor Endothelial ERK Activation, Angiogenesis, and Tumor Growth by Sorafenib (BAY43-9006) Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 169(5): 1875 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Matsukuma, M. Yoshihara, F. Kasai, A. Kato, A. Yoshida, M. Akaike, O. Kobayashi, H. Nakayama, Y. Sakuma, T. Yoshida, et al. Rapid and Simple Detection of Hot Spot Point Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, BRAF, and NRAS in Cancers Using the Loop-Hybrid Mobility Shift Assay J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2006; 8(4): 504 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Karbowniczek, G. P. Robertson, and E. P. Henske Rheb Inhibits C-Raf Activity and B-Raf/C-Raf Heterodimerization J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25447 - 25456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. James, T. Dumeni, M. S. Stark, D. L. Duffy, G. W. Montgomery, N. G. Martin, and N. K. Hayward Rapid Screening of 4000 Individuals for Germ-line Variations in the BRAF Gene Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1675 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sharma, M. A. Tran, S. Liang, A. K. Sharma, S. Amin, C. D. Smith, C. Dong, and G. P. Robertson Targeting Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase in the Mutant (V600E) B-Raf Signaling Cascade Effectively Inhibits Melanoma Lung Metastases Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 8200 - 8209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Durant, K. S. Paffett, M. Shrivastav, G. S. Timmins, W. F. Morgan, and J. A. Nickoloff UV Radiation Induces Delayed Hyperrecombination Associated with Hypermutation in Human Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(16): 6047 - 6055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Thomas, B. Weir, and M. Meyerson Genomic approaches to lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4384s - 4391s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Johnson Targeted therapies in combination with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4451s - 4457s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Jackson, I. Lea, A. Rashid, S. D. Peddada, and J. K. Dunnick Genetic Alterations in Cancer Knowledge System: Analysis of Gene Mutations in Mouse and Human Liver and Lung Tumors Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 400 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Somasundaram, R. Swoboda, L. Caputo, L. Otvos, B. Weber, P. Volpe, P. van Belle, S. Hotz, D. E. Elder, F. M. Marincola, et al. Human Leukocyte Antigen-A2-Restricted CTL Responses to Mutated BRAF Peptides in Melanoma Patients. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3287 - 3293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Canchola, P. L. Horn-Ross, and D. M. Purdie Risk of Second Primary Malignancies in Women with Papillary Thyroid Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2006; 163(6): 521 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Sapio, D. Posca, G. Troncone, G. Pettinato, L. Palombini, G. Rossi, G. Fenzi, and M. Vitale Detection of BRAF mutation in thyroid papillary carcinomas by mutant allele-specific PCR amplification (MASA) Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 154(2): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Toyooka, M. Tokumo, H. Shigematsu, K. Matsuo, H. Asano, K. Tomii, S. Ichihara, M. Suzuki, M. Aoe, H. Date, et al. Mutational and Epigenetic Evidence for Independent Pathways for Lung Adenocarcinomas Arising in Smokers and Never Smokers Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1371 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. M. Grbovic, A. D. Basso, A. Sawai, Q. Ye, P. Friedlander, D. Solit, and N. Rosen V600E B-Raf requires the Hsp90 chaperone for stability and is degraded in response to Hsp90 inhibitors PNAS, January 3, 2006; 103(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Moore, H. W. Hirte, L. Siu, A. Oza, S. J. Hotte, O. Petrenciuc, F. Cihon, C. Lathia, and B. Schwartz Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel Raf kinase and VEGFR inhibitor BAY 43-9006, administered for 28 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1688 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Beeram, A. Patnaik, and E. K. Rowinsky Raf: A Strategic Target for Therapeutic Development Against Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2005; 23(27): 6771 - 6790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Davies, C. Hunter, R. Smith, P. Stephens, C. Greenman, G. Bignell, J. Teague, A. Butler, S. Edkins, C. Stevens, et al. Somatic Mutations of the Protein Kinase Gene Family in Human Lung Cancer Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7591 - 7595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Y.-Z. Feng, T. Shiozawa, T. Miyamoto, H. Kashima, M. Kurai, A. Su