Cancer Research Donn Young  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, K.
[Cancer Research 62, 7018-7024, December 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

CNN-Gd3+ Enables Cell Nucleus Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer Cells: The Last 600 nm

Stefan Heckl1, Jürgen Debus, Jürgen Jenne, Rüdiger Pipkorn, Waldemar Waldeck, Herbert Spring, Ralf Rastert, Claus W. von der Lieth and Klaus Braun

Department of Oncological Diagnostics and Therapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [S. H.]; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [J. D., J. J., R. R., K. B.]; Central Section for Peptide Synthesis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [R. P.]; Division Organisation of Complex Genomes, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [H. S.]; Division Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [W. W.]; and Central Section for Spectroscopy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany [C. W. v. d. L.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Molecular imaging is defined as the characterization and measurement of biological processes at the cellular and molecular level. Molecular imaging, therefore, necessitates a sufficient amount of contrast agent within the cell. Consequently, we realized that the intracellular uptake and cell compartment specificity of the commonly used interstitial contrast agent gadolinium (Gd3+) with a cell-nucleus directed peptide module could be helpful. This modular molecule is characterized by a Gd3+-complex module that is bound to a transmembrane transport unit (TPU) of human origin and further to a nucleus-directed address module (nuclear localization sequence) resulting in a specific cell nucleus-directed nuclear localization sequence-conjugated Gd3+-complex (CNN-Gd3+-complex). By use of magnetic resonance imaging, Gd3+ was detected within DU-145 prostate cancer cells after only 10 min. The nuclear localization was confirmed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. The resulting MRI signal enhancement only slightly decreased over the next 48 h compared with an absolute loss of signal enhancement after only 8 h when a random target sequence was used. Therefore, our method seems promising for in vivo application in molecular imaging.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Molecular imaging is defined as the characterization and measurement of biological processes at the cellular and molecular level (1) and thus necessitates an accumulation of contrast agent within the cells. Until now, the use of gadolinium (Gd3+) contrast agents was limited to the extracellular space. We demonstrate a method with which a delivery of contrast agent into the cytoplasm and finally into the cell nucleus is possible. There have been numerous proposals as to how this could be achieved; functional peptides such as HIV-1 tat provide a solution for the transport of Gd3+ across the cell membranes. The HIV-1 tat peptide has been detected within the cell nucleus (2 , 3) . There are several signs indicating that HIV-1 tat peptide possesses transactivating properties (4) and can induce apoptosis in hippocampal neurons (5) . We realized the potential of the transmembrane transport of Gd3+ using an amphiphilic transport peptide of human origin (Table 1)Citation , which contains a similar peptide sequence to that of the homeodomain of Antennapedia (6) . This similar peptide sequence was chosen to minimize the risk of immunizing reactions and is the subject of further in vivo investigations (6) . Our modularly constructed CNN-Gd3+-complex consists of the above described transport peptide which is cleavably covalently linked to the nuclear localization sequence of SV40T-antigen (7) via a disulfide bond. The NLS is in turn linked to the Gd3+-complex (Fig. 1)Citation . The nuclear transport is mediated by soluble cytoplasmic receptors (importins) and uses an active Ran-GDP-system (8) . This principle enables the rapid nuclear accumulation (9) of Gd3+-complex by a CNN2 -conjugated Gd3+-complex (CNN-Gd3+-complex).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Biochemical design of the functional modules used in the MRI and CLSM studya

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Left, spatial representation of one possible configuration of the Bioshuttle conjugate molecule with attached Gd3+-complex. The methods used to derive this model are described in detail in "Materials and Methods." The TPU (light brown) and the address peptide (light blue) are given as ribbon representation of the peptide backbone. The heavy atoms of the Cys-Cys bridge between the two peptide units and the two Lys residues connecting the Gd3+-complex to the NLS are displayed in a ball and stick representation using an atom color code (carbon, green; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue). The van der Waals spheres of the Gd ion are shown in magenta. Additionally, the hydrogen atoms (white) of the two H2O molecules in complex with the Gd3+ are displayed. Right, a hydrophobicity color code has been mapped onto the water-accessible surface of the conjugate molecule (blue for hydrophilic areas; red for lipophilic areas). Both representations were generated using the InsightII software package. Because no hydrophobicity parameters for the Gd3+ complex are available, the surface of this part of the conjugate molecule has been set to white.

 

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of TPU Structures by Sequence Retrieval System Biocomputing
A FASTA search was carried out in the HUSAR Sequence Retrieval System. We searched for peptides of human origin containing sequence homologies to the sequence of the Antennapedia peptide fragment RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK. Among several domains, we detected a Smith-Waterman score of: 1B72:A HOMEOBOX PROTEIN HOX-B1: 86.667% identity (86.667% ungapped) in a 15-amino acid overlap.

To find the optimal sequence and structural homologues, we selected the amino acid sequence with the above described score of 1B72:A, which was further used as the TPU. In the alignment, identical amino acids were displayed with ":", and the similarities were displayed with ".". This sequence was chosen with a view to future in vivo experiments with its promise of a lesser risk of immunizing reactions (6) .

Synthesis of the CNN-Gd3+-Complex and the CNRN-Gd3+-Complex
To perform solid phase synthesis of peptide modules we used the N-(9-fluoenyl)methoxycarbonyl strategy in a fully automated synthesizer Syro II (MultiSyn Tech, Germany) described by Merriefield (10) . The syntheses of TPU transmembrane peptide (Table 1Citation , #3723), the NLS (part of the CNN-Gd3+-complex) (Table 1Citation , #1552/a), and the random NLS (part of the CNRN-Gd3+-complex) (Table 1Citation , #1552/b) were performed with an identical procedure. Stochiometric amounts of NLS-K2-DTPH-peptide and Gd3+ (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were solved in an aqueous NaCl solution (0.9%). After 12 h, the complexation process was stopped. The complex formation of the Random-K2-DTPH-peptide and Gd3+ was performed with an identical procedure.

Both the modular ALEXACNNFITC-Gd3+-Complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/af) and the ALEXACNRNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/bf) were composed of an ALEXA 546 Fluor-tagged cellular membrane transport peptide (TPU) and a FITC-tagged Gd3+-complex covalently linked to a NLS (NLS [SV40-T]). A cysteine-mediated disulfide bond enables the cleavable connection between the TPU and the NLS.

All products were precipitated in ether and purified by preparative HPLC (Shimadzu LC-8A, Japan) on a YMC ODS-A 7A S-7 µm reverse phase column (20 x 250 mm) using of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water (A) and 60% acetonitrile in water (B) as eluent. Peptides were eluted with a successive linear gradient increasing from 25 to 60% B-eluent in 49 min at a flow rate of 10 ml x min-1. The fractions corresponding to the purified conjugate were lyophilized. Sequences of single modules as well as the complete bimodular construct are characterized with analytical HPLC (Shimadzu LC-10, Japan) using a YMC-Pack Pro C18 (150 x 4.6-mm inside diameter) S-5 µm, 120A-column with 0.1% trifluoracetic acid in water (A) and 20% acetonitrile in water (B) as eluent. The analytical gradient ranged from 5% (B) to 80% (B) in 35 min (Fig. 2)Citation . Further characterization was performed with laser desorption mass spectrometry (Finnigan, Vision 2000; Fig. 3Citation ). Cysteine groups of the human transmembrane peptide TPU [H2N-TQVKIWFQNRRMKQKK-(Cys-CO-NH2)-(SH)-CONH2] (Table 1Citation , #3723) and the NLS peptide module Gd3+-compound {Gd3+-[DTPH]4-K2-[PKKKRKV]-(Cys-CO-NH2)-(SH)-CONH2, (NLSSV40T)} (Table 1Citation , #1552a) were oxidized at the range of 2 mg x ml-1 in a 20% DMSO water solution. Five h later, the reaction was completed. The random sequence peptide (Table 1Citation , #1552b) was linked under identical conditions. The progress of oxidation was monitored by analytical C18 reverse-phase HPLC.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. HPLC of CNN-Gd3+ and CNRN-Gd3+. Details of the process are described in "Materials and Methods." A, CNN-Gd3+. Substance purity, 94.9% according to the HPLC; retention time, 11.9 min. B, CNRN-Gd3+. Substance purity, 94.9% according to the HPLC; retention time, 13.2 min.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Example of a mass spectrum for a CNN-Gd3+ sample.

 
Cell Culture.
Cell culturing of DU-145 prostate cancer cells was performed as described previously (9) .

Localization of the NLS-Gd3+-Complex by CLSM.
To perform fluorescence microscopic studies, DU-145 cells and lymphocytes (5 x 105) were incubated for 24 h in Quadriperm plus (Heraeus, Germany) containing sterile glass coverslips. After two wash cycles with MEM, the cells were incubated with ALEXACNNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/af) and ALEXACNRNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/bf; 100 pM) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 30 min. The culture medium was removed to enable later microscopic studies. The cells were washed twice and were finally embedded in Moviol. The verification of the intracellular distribution of the ALEXA 546 Fluor and FITC bilabeled ALEXACNNFITC-Gd3+-complex and ALEXACNRNFITC-Gd3+-complex in living DU-145 cells and lymphocytes was conducted by a Zeiss laser confocal microscope (LSM 510 UV). For excitation of the FITC, a filter set with 488- and 522-nm emission filters was used. In the case of ALEXA 546 Fluor, excitation was achieved by a 543-nm filter with subsequent filtering of the emission by a 580-nm filter. The optical slice thickness was 700 nm. The excitation line of an argon/krypton laser was used to detect a fluorescence signal from ALEXACNNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/af) and ALEXACNRNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/bf). To increase the contrast of optical sections, 12–20 single exposures were averaged. Parameters of the image acquisition were adapted to show signal intensities in accordance with the visual microscopic image.


    Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+ Concentration Using ICP-MS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The nuclear uptake of CNN-Gd3+ was examined by a mass spectrometry method. Gd3+ concentration measurements were carried out by a high resolution element mass spectrometer (Finnigan MAT ELEMENT2, Bremen, Germany) with ICP (ICP-MS) at a resolution ({Delta}m x m-1) of 4000. The instrument was equipped with a self-aspirating 100 µl x min-1 PFA-Nebulizer and spray chamber, standard injector, and torch. Instrument and operation parameters were as follows: plasma power, 1100 W; cool gas flow, 15.5 liters x min-1; auxiliary gas flow, 1 liter x min-1; sample gas flow, 1 liter x min-1; mass window, 850%; search window, 800%; integration window, 80%; samples/peak, 30; no. of scans, 3 (10) . Internal standard correction and drift correction were active for 103Rh (for ICP, E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, diluted to 5 ng x ml-1). Before measurement, the instrument was tuned and calibrated using 1 ng x ml-1 multi-element standard solution (Merck).

Sample Preparation.
All preparations of samples and standards were carried out at clean flow box benches. For dilutions, purified and background measured water was used (>17.5 M{Omega} x cm-1).

A closed, pressurized microwave digestion unit (Mars5; CEM GmbH, Germany) equipped with a rotor for 14 vessels, each containing three Teflon vessels with a volume of 3 ml was used for digestion of samples containing cellular components. Aliquots of 200-µl sample (cells and supernatant) and 200 µl of HNO3 60% (grade, Ultra pur; Merck) were digested as follows: ramp of 15 min, 300 W, 100%, 0.5 bar, 150°C, holding for 10 min; and ramp of 15 min, 300 W, 100%, 0 bar to cool to room temperature, holding for another 5 min. The samples were diluted by an additional 600 µl of HNO3. Before measurement, 200 µl of the samples were diluted by 700 µl H2O and 100 µl of 103RhCl3 standard solution (Merck) was added. Two hundred µl of cell-free suspensions were diluted with 600 µl of H2O and 100 µl of HNO3, and 100 µl of 103RhCl3 standard solution were added. In accordance with the above-mentioned pretreatment, the samples (supernatant and cell pellet) were each measured separately. With the resulting data, a standard curve was formulated from several differing Gd3+ concentrations. This standard curve along with a second control curve (only clear water with no chemical ingredients) served for a comparable evaluation (ICP-MS).

Cell Viability.
Cell viability was assessed by dye exclusion assay. DU-145 cells were incubated with both conjugates (CNN-Gd3+-complex and CNRN-Gd3+-complex; 0.5 mM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Nontreated cells served as controls for the same time periods. Five min after trypan blue staining (0.4%), viable and nonviable cells were microscopically quantified. Cell counts for each experimental series were repeated twice.


    Molecular Modeling
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Because no experimental data for these modules were available, spatial models were generated based on homologous data. The objective of the following spatial model is a representation of the relative magnitudes of the component units and an approximation of their respective structures for the purposes of visualization and is, as such, not exactly representative of the molecular structure. The spatial model of the bioconjugate was formed by manual connection of the molecular modules (TPU, NLS, and DPTH). The FASTA search option of the PDB (11) was used to identify sequences that show high similarity with the TPU (KMTRQTWWHRIKHKC) and the NLS (PKKKRKV). In the case of TPU, the crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase, XerD (PDB entry, 1A0P: 217–231: QMTRQTFWHRIKHYA) was taken as a template for which an 85% identity in a 13-amino acid overlap was shown. For NLS, a part of the crystal structure of the tissue transglutaminase (PDB entry, 1KV3: 598–605: PKQKRKLV) was taken, which in turn showed a 71% identity in a 7-amino acid overlap. Although the sequences are too short to provide highly reliable spatial structures, this approach seems to be justified to generate models for the purpose of visualization. The biopolymer option of the INSIGHTII module was applied to mutate the required amino acids. A minimization using the AMBER-Force field was followed by a short molecular dynamics simulation in aqueous solution to relax the constructed model. The Gd3+-complex was taken from the Cambridge Structural Database (entry, heqbua; Ref. 12 ). The aforementioned molecular modules were connected using INSIGHTII software (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). INSIGHTII was also used to produce the graphical representations of the bioconjugates.


    MRI
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DU-145 Cell Uptake of the CNN-Gd3+-Complex and CNRN-Gd3+-Complex Compared with That of Magnevist.
DU-145 cells were harvested and divided into tubes (Falcon; Becton Dickinson; number of cells, 40 x 106 cells/tube). The CNN-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/a), the CNRN-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/b), and the Magnevist were each dissolved in MEM in a concentration of 0.5 mM and were then incubated for 10, 20, and 30 min up to 3 h. After centrifugation of the tubes (800 rpm x 10 min), the incubation medium (supernatant) was removed, and the cells (pellet) were washed twice with MEM without conjugates to remove all unbound Gd3+-DTPH (Magnevist), CNN-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/a), and CNRN-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/b).

MRI used a 1.5-T whole body Siemens Magnetom Vision Plus with a standard circular polarized head coil. The test tubes were firmly positioned parallel to each other totally submerged in a water bath. The imaging protocol consisted of an axial T1-weighted spin echo sequence (TR, 600 ms; TE, 15 ms; scan time, 45 s). The field of view was 200 mm x 200 mm, using a 256 x 256 imaging matrix and two acquisitions. Slice thickness was 2 mm, resulting in a pixel size of 0.79 x 0.78 mm. T1 and T2 relaxation times within the pellets of the three tubes (CNN-Gd3+, CNRN-Gd3+, and Magnevist) were measured to evaluate the intracellular relaxivity of the respective contrast agents (R = 1/T1). The T1 relaxation time was measured by an inversion recovery sequence (TR, 5000 ms; TE, 76 ms; TI, 25–4000 ms; 17 different TI values; scan time, 15 x 25 s. field of view, 160 mm x 160 mm; matrix, 132 x 256; slice thickness, 7 mm; pixel size, 1.21 x 0.63 mm). T2 relaxation time was measured by a multi echo sequence (TR, 5000 ms; 16 TE values; 30–245 ms; field of view, 250 mm x 250 mm; matrix, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 5 mm; pixel size, 0.98 x 0.98 mm; scan time, 21 min 21 s). Signal intensity measurements were obtained from DU-145 carcinoma cells and background. A tube with DU-145 cells, incubated in MEM without contrast agent, was used as a control. In this way, the DU-145 cells were tested for uptake of the Gd3+-complex-transporter when bound to either a NLS sequence (#1552/a) or a random sequence (#1552/b). As a control, the same procedure was performed in nontumor cells (lymphocytes). Because of a signal intensity maximum in prostate cancer cells and lymphocytes after 3 h incubation, efflux measurements were begun after this time period. For this, both cell types were washed with conjugate-free MEM to remove all Gd3+-complexes. This procedure was repeated hourly until no signal increase compared with the control tube (DU-145 prostate cancer cells or lymphocytes in MEM without contrast agent) could be detected in T1-weighted sequences.

All experimental sequences were performed three times.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our predominant aim was to deliver the Gd3+-complex into the cell nucleus. This had been achieved previously using the plasma membrane translocation peptide, HIV-1 tat (2) . This viral protein possesses nuclear import characteristics (13) . We were also able to confirm the good uptake characteristics of the HIV-1 tat peptide. However, the HIV-1 tat peptide possesses not only a transactivating effect on the long terminal repeat promoter but also can induce apoptosis in hippocampal neurons (5 , 14 , 15) . As a consequence of these transactivating effects of HIV-1 tat peptide, we chose a different method and examined human TPUs, which show a comparable transport efficiency (Table 1Citation , #1552).

In parallel, we used molecular modeling to obtain the most appropriate spatial visualization of the conjugate (Fig. 1)Citation . Although it is clear that the presented spatial structures of the bioconjugate are one approximate configuration of the many which flexible molecules such as peptides may exhibit, they represent to some extent a realistic spatial model; an all-atom model of the complete molecules is presented, the shapes of the component modules are as have been reported for homologous structures, the relative sizes of the modules are correct, and the physicochemical characteristics of the surface are represented.

In MRI, an increased intracellular signal intensity in DU-145 cells could be detected after only 10 min incubation with our nuclear Gd3+-delivery system CNN-Gd3+-complex (Fig. 4Citation ; Table 1Citation , #1552/a; whole body 1.5 T Siemens Magnetom, standard circular polarized head coil). Because of the inability of MRI to recognize different cellular compartments, CLSM was further used to confirm the nuclear localization of the Gd3+-complex. Because of the higher sensitivity of CLSM compared with MRI, lower concentrations of the CNNFITC-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/af) could be used in CLSM (CLSM, 100 pM; MRI, 0.5 mM). In CLSM, a nuclear fluorescence signal was detected that would suggest that the CNN-Gd3+-complex accumulated mainly at this site (Table 1Citation , #1552/a; Fig. 5aCitation ). If, by way of comparison, Magnevist alone was used as a contrast agent in MRI, there was no signal change above that of the DU-145 cells that had been incubated solely in MEM. The measured relaxivity (R) within the DU-145 cell pellets changed by more than a factor of 5 after incubation with our Gd3+-complex transporter (R = 0.00354) as compared with that after incubation solely with Magnevist (R = 0.00069). The mass spectrometrically measured higher concentration of Gd3+ within the nucleus compared with that in the cytoplasm (factorial difference, 40.000) could be explained by the interaction with Ran-GDP and importins. To show the nuclear specificity of the CNN-Gd3+-complex, a CNRN-Gd3+-complex (random NLS; Table 1Citation , #1552/b) was used resulting in a slightly higher MRI signal enhancement after 3 h compared with that after using the specific NLS.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Upper part, graph of MR signal intensity versus time after incubation with the Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-K-K-NLS-C-S{cap}S-C-TPU (CNN-Gd3+; red dashed circles) and the Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-K-K-Random-C-S{cap}S-C-TPU (CNRN-Gd3+; blue dashed squares) for DU-145 human prostate cancer cells. Data represent three independent experiments. Lower part, axial T1-weighted MR images of the cell pellets consisting of 40 x 106 cells. MEM was used as cell culture medium.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. a, CLSM optical section of living DU-145 prostate cancer cells incubated for 30 min with the modular transport peptide Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-NLS-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA conjugate consisting of the human TPU and a Gd3+-[DTPH]4-NLS conjugated with a cleavable disulfide linker (100 pM). The green fluorescence signal reveals a distinct nuclear localization of the peptide. b, a Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-Random-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA conjugate consisting of the human transmembrane carrier TPU covalently attached to a FITC-labeled peptide random sequence was added to the culture medium 30 min before CLSM analysis of living DU-145 cells at a concentration of 100 pM. Fluorescence signals were detected exclusively within the cytoplasm, whereas the nuclei remained unstained.

 
After the signal intensity had reached its maximum after 3 h, only a slight decrease was then observed over the next 45 h when the CNN-Gd3+-complex was used (Fig. 4)Citation . A possible explanation could be the lack of efflux of the CNN-Gd3+-complex out of the nucleus (Table 1Citation , #1552/a). In contrast, the CNRN-Gd3+-complex (Table 1Citation , #1552/b) could not enter the nuclear space and remained in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5b)Citation . The random sequence did not represent a suitable substrate for karyophilic proteins (importins). Therefore, efflux was possible, and a complete reduction of signal enhancement could be observed after only 8 h (Fig. 4)Citation . In CLSM, dual staining of both the ALEXACNRNFITC- Gd3+-complex {Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-Random-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA} and ALEXACNNFITC-Gd3+-complex {Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-NLS-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA} was performed to determine whether ALEXA 546 Fluor and FITC fluorescence signals were localized in the cytoplasm in the case of the random sequence or in the nucleus after using the specific NLS sequence (Table 1)Citation . By this method, the exact cytoplasmic localization of the Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-Random-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA (Table 1Citation , #1552/bf) could be confirmed (Fig. 5b)Citation , revealing the real source of the MRI signal enhancement. This could be explained by the fact that Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-Random-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA harboring the scrambled NLS (random) as well as the ALEXA 546 Fluor-labeled TPU (Table 1Citation , #1552/bf) could not enter the cell nucleus and remained outside within the cytoplasm, resulting in a mixed fluorescence signal (ALEXA 546 Fluor, red; FITC, green; Fig. 5bCitation ).

In contrast, the Gd3+-[DTPH]4-HN-KFITC-K-NLS-C-S{cap}S-C-TPUALEXA (Table 1Citation , #1552/af) was proven to be located within the nucleus (Fig. 5a)Citation . Some cells in Fig. 5aCitation can be seen not to have taken gadolinium up into the nucleus, which could be explained as follows. The transport of CNN-Gd3+ into the nucleus is an active Ran-GDP-dependent process and will not take place in cells functionally damaged during preparation but still apparently morphologically intact. However, the transport from the extracellular space into the cytoplasm is a passive process and would continue to take place even in functionally damaged cells. Additionally, some asynchronicity between cells with respect to the rates of nuclear uptake can be assumed. A slightly mixed fluorescence signal was also detected in the cytoplasm, whereas additionally a distinct sole green fluorescence signal (FITC) was observed within the nucleus (Fig. 5a)Citation . The cytoplasmic cleavage of the disulfide bond between the two modules ALEXA 546 Fluor-tagged TPU and the FITC-tagged NLS-Gd3+-complex is followed by the effective nuclear import of the NLS-Gd3+-complexFITC (Table 1Citation , #1552/af; Fig. 5aCitation ). No evidence of cytotoxicity was observed after incubation with CNN- or CNRN-Gd3+-complexes for 72 h.

Our results suggest a promising specific and noninvasive method for the visualization of the cell nucleus in MRI. The basic Gd3+-complex (Magnevist) cannot enter the cell in concentrations sufficient for an MRI signal enhancement. However, after using high Gd3+-complex concentrations without a specific delivery system in combination with a long incubation period (100 h), intracellular Gd3+-complex was measured in amounts sufficient for Gd3+-NCT (16) . These time and dose requirements seem barely conceivable with respect to future NCT in humans. However, the use of Gd3+ in NCT would be advantageous because of the large neutron capture cross-section of 157Gd3+, which leads to irreparable DNA damage after neutron irradiation (17) . Therefore, the CNN-Gd3+-complex would make a suitable target for neutrons in NCT to the greatest effect when situated in the cell nucleus. Additionally, the potential to trace the CNN-Gd3+-complex directly by MRI would be useful for evaluating possible effects of Gd3+-NCT.

It is also conceivable that the CNN-Gd3+-complex could simultaneously take on a diagnostic as well as a therapeutic role. To perform a highly efficient chemo- and radiotherapy, it is indispensable to know the DNA repair enzyme activity in tumors (18) . Determining such enzyme activity levels in MRI before further treatment was commenced would be helpful in the decision-making process.

A contrast agent called EgadMe (19) was applied by microinjection into the cell nucleus to measure galactosidase activity. Water access to the first coordination sphere of Gd3+ was blocked with a substrate that could be removed by enzymatic cleavage. After cleavage, Gd3+ can interact directly with water protons to increase the MR signal. Galactopyranose was used as a blocking group, which in turn enabled the measurement of the activity of galactosidase. A similar method could potentially be used to visualize alkyltransferase, decisive for the outcome of chemotherapy (19) , in the nucleus by first preventing water access to the first coordination sphere of a Gd3+-complex with a suitable substrate, which when enzymatically cleaved would lead to water access and a resulting increase in signal intensity in MRI.

In conclusion, the CNN-Gd3+complex is an example of a nonviral and microinjection-free method for delivery of Gd3+ into the cell nucleus.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Oncological Diagnostics and Therapy, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 0049-6221-42-2492; E-mail: s.heckl{at}dkfz-heidelberg.de Back

2 The abbreviations used are: CNN, cell nucleus-directed nuclear localization sequence; TPU, transport peptide unit; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; PDB, Protein Data Bank; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NCT, neutron capture therapy. Back

Received 4/17/02. Accepted 9/ 4/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Measurement of Nuclear Gd3+...
 Molecular Modeling
 MRI
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Weissleder R., Mahmood U. Molecular imaging.. Radiology, 219: 316-333, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bhorade R., Weissleder R., Nakakoshi T., Moore A., Tung C. H. Macrocyclic chelators with paramagnetic cations are internalized into mammalian cells via a HIV-Tat derived membrane translocation peptide.. Bioconjug. Chem., 11: 301-305, 2000.[Medline]
  3. Efthymiadis A., Briggs L. J., Jans D. A. The HIV-1 tat nuclear localization sequence confers novel nuclear import properties.. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 1623-1628, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Liu Y., Jones M., Hingtgen C. M., Bu G., Laribee N., Tanzi R. E., Moir R. D. Uptake of HIV-1 Tat protein mediated by low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein disrupts the neuronal metabolic balance of the receptor ligands.. Nat. Med., 6: 1380-1387, 2000.[Medline]
  5. Meucci O., Fatatis A., Simen A. A., Bushell T. J., Gray P. W., Miller R. J. Chemokines regulate hippocampal neuronal signaling and gp120 neurotoxicity.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 14500-14505, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Derossi D., Joliot A. H., Chassaing G., Prochiantz A. The third helix of the Antennapedia homeodomain translocates through biological membranes.. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 10444-10450, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location.. Cell, 39: 499-509, 1984.[Medline]
  8. Gorlich D., Mattaj I. W. Nucleocytoplasmic transport.. Science (Wash. DC), 271: 1513-1518, 1996.[Abstract]
  9. Braun K., Peschke P., Pipkorn R., Lampel S., Wachsmuth M., Waldeck W., Debus J. A biological transporter for the delivery of peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) to the nuclear compartment of living cells.. J. Mol. Biol., 318: 237-243, 2002.[Medline]
  10. Merriefield R. B. Solid phase synthesis.. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85: 2149-2154, 1963.
  11. Berman H. M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T. N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I. N., Bourne P. E. The Protein Data Bank.. Nucleic Acids Res., 2: 235-242, 2000.
  12. Allen F. H, and Kennard, O.. 3D Search and Research using the Cambridge Structural Database. Chemical Design Automation News, 8: 31-37, 1993.
  13. Vivès E., Brodin P., Lebleu B. A truncated HIV-1 tat protein basic domain rapidly translocates through the plasma membrane and accumulates in the cell nucleus.. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 16010-16017, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Anderson D. C., Nichols E., Manger R., Woodle D., Barry M., Fritzberg A. R. Tumor cell retention of antibody FAB fragments is enhanced by an attached HIV TAT protein-derived peptide.. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 30: 876-884, 1993.
  15. Schwarze S., Hruska K. A., Dowdy S. F. Protein transduction: unrestricted delivery into all cells?.. Trends Cell Biol., 10: 290-295, 2000.[Medline]
  16. De Stasio G., Casalbore P., Pallini R., Gilbert B., Sanita F., Ciotti M. T., Rosi G., Festinesi A., Larocca L. M., Rinelli A., Perret D., Mogk D. W., Perfetti P., Mehta M. P., Mercanti D. Gadolinium in human glioblastoma cells for gadolinium neutron capture therapy.. Cancer Res., 61: 4272-4277, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hofmann B., Fischer C. O., Lavaczeck R., Platzek J., Semmler W. Gadolinium neutron capture therapy (GdNCT) of melanoma cells and solid tumors with the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent Gadobutrol.. Investig. Radiol., 34: 126-133, 1999.[Medline]
  18. Friedman H. S., McLendon R. E., Kerby T., Dugan M., Bigner S. H., Henry A. J., Ashley D. M. DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to Temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma.. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3851-3857, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Louie A. Y., Huber M. M., Ahrens E. T., Rothbacher U., Moats R., Jacobs R. E., Fraser S. E., Meade T. J. In vivo visualization of gene expression using magnetic resonance imaging.. Nat. Biotech., 18: 321-325, 2000.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Heckl and U. Vogel
Nuclear Trafficking of a Gadolinium Conjugate in Nude Mice Xenografted with Human LN-229 Glioma
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 657 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online