| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Tumor Biology |
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, DIBIT-San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy [F. C., G. A., A. S., L. F., A. C.], and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [W. A., R. P.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF) to tumor vasculature. Given that CD13 is not only expressed in the angiogenic endothelium but also in other cell types, the mechanism(s) for the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates remains elusive. We have examined the expression of CD13 in normal and neoplastic human tissues and cells by using two anti-CD13 monoclonal antibodies. The immunoreactivity patterns obtained with cultured cells and tissue sections from kidney, breast, and prostate carcinomas suggest that different CD13 forms are expressed in myeloid cells, epithelia, and tumor-associated blood vessels. Both, direct binding assays with a CNGRCG-TNF conjugate (NGR-TNF) and competitive inhibition experiments with anti-CD13 antibodies showed that a CD13 isoform expressed in tumor blood vessels could function as a vascular receptor for the NGR motif. In contrast, CD13 expressed in normal kidney and in myeloid cells failed to bind to NGR-TNF. Consistently with these results, neither murine125I-NGR-TNF nor 125I-TNF accumulated in normal organs containing CD13-expressing cells after administration to mice. These findings may explain the selectivity and the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates and may have important implications in the development of vascular-targeted therapies based on the NGR/CD13 system. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To analyze this specificity, we have investigated the expression of CD13 in various human tissues and tumors using two mAbs and studied the CD13/NGR-TNF interaction in tissues expressing high levels of CD13. In addition, we have studied the interaction of human NGR-TNF with normal and neoplastic tissues in vitro, as well as the biodistribution of radio-labeled murine NGR-TNF and TNF in a mouse model. Our findings suggest that different CD13 isoforms are expressed within tumor vessels, normal epithelia, and myeloid cells. Moreover, we show that NGR-TNF can bind to vessels within or close to tumor nodules but not to vessels in normal tissues and to epithelial cells of CD13-rich organs. On the basis of these observations, we propose that the mechanism involved in the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates relies on recognition of a CD13 isoform selectively expressed within tumor associated vessels.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human recombinant TNF and NGR-TNF (consisting of human TNF1157 fused with the COOH terminus of CNGRCG) were prepared by recombinant DNA technology and purified from Escherichia coli cell extracts, as described (5) . The protein concentration was measured with a commercial protein quantification assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The in vitro cytolytic activity of NGR-TNF, estimated from a standard cytolytic assay with L-M mouse fibroblasts (25) , was (4.6 x 107) ± 0.4 units/mg, whereas that of purified human TNF was (5.45 x 107) ± 3.1 units/mg. The hydrodynamic volume of NGR-TNF was similar to that of TNF, a homotrimeric protein (26) , in gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex 75 HR column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The molecular mass of NGR-TNF subunits was 17938.0 ± 1.9 kDa (expected for NGR-TNF, 17939.4 kDa) by electrospray mass spectrometry (27) .
Complexes of human NGR-TNF and anti-TNF mAb 78 (termed NGR-TNF/78) were prepared by incubating a mixture of 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF and 1 µg/ml mAb 78, both in PBS containing 2% BSA for 20 min (20°C). A mixture of TNF and mAb 78 (termed TNF/78) was prepared in the same way using human TNF instead of NGR-TNF.
Recombinant murine IFN
fused with CNGRCG (NGR-IFN
) was prepared by recombinant DNA technology, essentially as described for NGR-TNF, and purified by immunoaffinity chromatography using an antimouse IFN
. Reducing and nonreducing SDS-PAGE of the final product showed a single band of 16 kDa. The synthetic peptide CgA (6068), corresponding to the chromogranin A fragment 6068, was prepared as described previously (28)
.
Immunohistochemical Studies.
Surgical specimens of human tissues were obtained from the Department of Histopathology, San Raffaele H Scientific Institute. Sections (56 µm thick) of Bouin-fixed (46 h), paraffin-embedded specimens were prepared and adsorbed on polylysine-coated slides. Antigens were detected using the avidin-biotin complex method as follows: tissue sections were rehydrated using xylenes and a graded alcohol series, according to standard procedures. Tissue sections were placed in a vessel containing 1 mM EDTA and boiled for 7 min using a microwave oven (1000 W). The vessel was then refilled with 1 mM EDTA and boiled again for 5 min. The tissue sections were left to cool and incubated in PBS containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min to quench endogenous peroxidase. The samples were then rinsed with PBS and incubated with 100200 µl of PBS containing 2% BSA (PBS-BSA; 1 h at room temperature), followed by the primary antibody or NGR-TNF/78 complex in PBS-BSA (overnight at 4°C). The slides were then washed three times (3 min each) with PBS and incubated with PBS-BSA containing 2% normal horse serum (PBS-BSA-normal horse serum; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 5 min. The solution was then replaced with 3 µg/ml biotinylated horse antimouse IgG (H+L; Vector Laboratories) in PBS-BSA-normal horse serum and further incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed again and incubated for 30 min with Vectastain Elite Reagent (Vector Laboratories) diluted 1:100 in PBS. A tablet of 3,3'-diamino-benzidine-tetrahydrochloride (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was then dissolved in 10 ml of deionized water containing 0.03% hydrogen peroxide, filtered through a 0.2-µm membrane, and overlaid on tissue sections for 510 min. The slides were washed as above and counterstained with Harris hematoxylin.
FACS Analysis.
Expression of CD13- and NGR-TNF-binding sites by cultured human macrophages (stimulated with 1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide for 16 h), THP-1, MOLT-4, and CD13/MOLT-4 cells was measured by FACS. Before analysis, the cells were preincubated with Dulbeccos PBS (BioWhittaker) containing 30% human serum and 2% fetal bovine serum for 5 min, followed by 1 µg/ml WM15, 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78, or mAb 13C03 (diluted 1:2) in the same buffer (14 min, 4°C). After washing, the cells were incubated with a goat antimouse-FITC secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) diluted in the same buffer (14 min, 4°C) and fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS.
In Vivo Biodistribution Studies.
Murine 125I-NGR-TNF (1.41 µCi/µg) and 125I-TNF (1.8 µCi/µg) were prepared using Iodo-Gen precoated tubes (Pierce) according to the manufacturers instructions. 125I-NGR-TNF or 125I-TNF was injected i.p. into C57BL/6 mice weighing 1920 grams (Charles River Laboratories, Calco, Italy; 1 µg in 125 µl of 0.9% sodium chloride containing 0.1 mg/ml endotoxin-free human serum albumin). After 6 or 24 h, the animals were sacrificed and surgically dissected. The radioactivity in tissues was quantified by
-scintillation counting of 125I.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
conjugate (data not shown). These and the above results suggest that the NGR receptor and WM15 antigen colocalize in tumor-associated vessels.
To establish that the CD13 isoform recognized by the WM15 antibody is the one that is recognized by the NGR peptide, we performed competitive binding assays. Various reagents were used in these experiments. The binding of WM15 to tumor-associated vessels was inhibited by NGR-TNF, NGR-IFN
, and CNGRC, but not by other control reagents lacking the NGR motif (Table 1)
. In contrast, the binding of 13C03 to the brush border of renal proximal tubule epithelial cells was not competed by NGR-TNF.
|
CD13 Expression in Breast and Prostate Cancer Metastasis and in Normal Tissues.
To test whether other tumors express the CD13 isoform recognized by NGR-TNF and mAb WM15, we analyzed human breast cancer tissue sections. In this case, an anti-CD34 mAb was used to identify vessels around tumor nodules (Fig. 2A)
and in normal adipose tissue in the same tissue section (Fig. 2B)
. NGR-TNF/78 recognized an antigen on the endothelial lining of vessels close to tumor nodules but did not stain normal vessels present in adipose tissue distant from the tumor (Fig. 2, C and D)
. Cytoplasmic staining of tumor cells with NGR-TNF/78 but not with TNF/78 or mAb 78 alone was also observed (Fig. 2, EG)
. Binding to vessels and tumor cells was competed with NGR-IFN
(Fig. 2H)
, suggesting that in both cases, binding depended on the NGR domain.
|
|
|
In conclusion, the results suggest that human NGR-TNF can bind to a receptor expressed in vessels within or close to human primary and metastatic tumors but not to normal tissues.
Characterization of CD13 in Myeloid and Lymphoid Cells.
To further characterize the CD13 isoform recognized by 13C03, WM15, and NGR-TNF/78, we investigated the binding of these reagents to myeloid and lymphoid cells. FACS analysis showed that WM15 recognizes THP-1 cells (acute monocytic leukemia) and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human macrophages but not Molt-4 cells (acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Fig. 5
). In contrast, neither 13C03 nor NGR-TNF/78 immunoreacted with these cell lines. Notably, these reagents failed to react with Molt-4 cells transfected with the human CD13 cDNA. In addition, NGR-TNF (50 µg/ml) did not inhibit the binding of WM15 to THP-1 cells (data not shown). The lack of detectable binding of NGR-TNF/78 to CD13/Molt-4 cells apparently contrasts with the results of previous studies showing that these cells bind phages expressing the CNGRC peptide on their surface (7)
. An explanation for this discrepancy is that these cells could express a very low fraction of CD13 molecules able to bind both NGR-phages and NGR-TNF/78. Whereas bound phage particles could be easily detected, even when present in low numbers, the binding of low amounts of NGR-TNF is undetectable by FACS. In addition, we have found that immunodetection of phage particles is at least two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than colony counting in bacterial infection assay.4
Thus, although a number of phages can be detected as binders compared with controls, the amount of NGR-binding CD13 isoform is quite low. In any case, the high level of CD13 expression and the lack of detectable binding of NGR-TNF strongly suggest that most CD13 molecules on these cells are unable to bind NGR-TNF.
|
Biodistribution of 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF in Mice.
To rule out the possibility that CD13 isoforms expressed by epithelial cells in kidney or other CD13-rich organs bind NGR-TNF in vivo, we examined the biodistribution of radiolabeled murine NGR-TNF and TNF in a mouse model. 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF (1 µg each) were administered to C57BL/6 mice. The kidney:blood ratios of 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF 6 or 24 h after administration were similar, suggesting that NGR-TNF does not accumulate in the kidney (Fig. 6)
. This finding agrees with the results of the above in vitro studies showing a lack of binding of NGR-TNF to CD13 isoforms expressed in normal kidney. Similarly, the tissue:blood ratios of other organs, including small intestine, liver, bone, lung, heart, muscle, and spleen, were similar, indicating that NGR-TNF does not accumulate in these organs.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The binding of WM15 to tissues but not 13C03 was competed with NGR-TNF or CNGRC peptide. This suggests that the NGR binding site sterically overlaps, at least partially, with the WM15 epitope on human CD13. The steric overlapping and the similar staining pattern observed with WM15 and NGR-TNF in tissue sections do not necessarily indicate that the structural determinants of WM15 epitope and NGR binding site are identical or have the same accessibility in all tissues. Indeed, we found that NGR-TNF does not recognize WM15-positive myeloid cells, by FACS analysis, suggesting that the structures of NGR binding site and WM15 epitope are different or differentially accessible in these cells. Thus, the CD13 isoform that binds NGR-TNF is likely a subpopulation of WM15-antigenic forms.
The selectivity of NGR-TNF for tumor-associated endothelial cells was not absolute. Other cells present in the tumor stroma and peri-nodular connective tissue, likely fibroblasts and mastocytes, were also stained. In addition, we observed a weak reactivity of NGR-TNF with breast and prostate cancer cells. Because it is known that breast cancer cells usually express CD13 (14) , it is possible that the staining of tumor cells was related to expression of CD13. We do not know whether these cells are accessible to systemically administered NGR-TNF. If they are, they may represent an additional homing site for targeted delivery of NGR-drug conjugates to tumors. In any case, expression of CD13 by tumor cells is not a prerequisite for tumor targeting, because we have shown previously that even the growth of CD13-negative tumor cells in vivo is efficiently inhibited by NGR-TNF when the tumors are well established and vascularized (5) .
It is not known what the structural determinants responsible for differential binding of anti-CD13 mAbs and NGR-TNF to CD13 isoforms are. CD13 is synthesized as a 130-kDa intracellular precursor of 967 amino acids and post-translationally modified in the Golgi to produce a 150240 kDa mature cell surface molecule (13 , 29 , 30) . In the mature protein, 2530% of the molecular weight is carbohydrate. Previous investigations have shown that differential or incomplete utilization of O-glycosylation sites results in at least five isoforms that are differentially recognized by antibodies, likely attributable to variable masking of protein epitopes (31) . We have found that enzymatic deglycosylation of soluble CD13, isolated from human placenta, with O-glycanase and neuraminidase does not increase the binding of NGR-TNF in various ELISA and ligand blotting assays (data not shown). Moreover, treatment of normal kidney tissue sections with these enzymes did not increase to binding of NGR-TNF to the brush border of the epithelial cells (data not shown). These results argue against the hypothesis that carbohydrates mask the NGR binding site in nonfunctional CD13 isoforms. As alternative hypotheses, it is possible that the differential reactivity of NGR-TNF with different cells is related to different conformations of CD13, e.g., previous studies showed that the binding of CD13 to natural peptide substrates or antibodies induces conformational changes and exposure of cryptic epitopes (32) . Alternatively, association with other proteins or elements present in the tumor microenvironment or in tissues can cause differential reactivity or availability to NGR-TNF. Additional work is necessary to clarify this point.
It has been reported that the biological function of CD13 varies depending on tissue microenvironment. CD13 exists as a membrane bound or a soluble form, both of which catalyze the removal of NH2-terminal residues, preferentially neutral, from small peptides (9) . It has been suggested that CD13 plays a role in antigen processing (33) , in neuropeptide and cytokine degradation (34 , 35) , in cell cycle control and differentiation (13 , 36 , 37) , and in tumor invasion and extracellular matrix degradation (38 , 39) . Two recent reports showed that CD13 is also important in angiogenesis and is activated by angiogenic signals (7 , 40) . The presence of the NGR binding site in tumor vessels could be required for the selective interaction of this site with other compounds potentially mimicked by NGR during angiogenesis and tumor invasion. NGR-TNF could be a valuable tool for the identification of this CD13 isoform, as well as for the characterization of its biological function.
The observation that human NGR-TNF can bind vessels in human neoplastic tissue section could also have important clinical implications. Previously, we showed that systemically administered murine NGR-TNF is 1030 times more efficient than murine TNF in decreasing the tumor burden of animals bearing well-established lymphomas, but both TNF and NGR-TNF were equally effective in animals with freshly implanted, and hence avascular, tumors (5) . Coadministration of murine NGR-TNF with an antimurine CD13 antibody or a CNGRC peptide markedly decreased its antitumor effects, suggesting that the NGR domain of NGR-TNF can interact with murine CD13. The results of the present work suggest that NGR-TNF can also bind human CD13. Human NGR-TNF might have, therefore, more potent antitumor properties than human TNF in patients with vascularized tumors, as observed previously with murine TNF in mice. Indeed, several lines of evidence suggest that the antitumor activity of TNF largely depends on selective obstruction and damage to tumor-associated vessels (41, 42, 43, 44, 45) . Because the clinical use of TNF as an anticancer drug is limited to locoregional treatments attributable to dose-limiting systemic toxicity, it is possible that targeted delivery of TNF to vessels via the NGR domain may allow systemic and/or locoregional treatment of patients with lower toxicity and stronger antitumor effects.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro and Ministero della Sanità of Italy (Ricerca Finalizzata). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, DIBIT-San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39-02-26-43-48-02; Fax: 39-02-26-43-47-86; E-mail: corti.angelo{at}hsr.it ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TNF, tumor necrosis factor
; mAb, monoclonal antibody; NGR-TNF, CNGRCG-tumor necrosis factor; FACS, fluorescent-activated cell sorter. ![]()
4 R. Pasqualini and W. Arap, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received 7/18/01. Accepted 11/30/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v Integrins as receptors for tumor targeting by circulating ligands. Nat. Biotechnol., 15: 542-546, 1997.[Medline]
antitumor immunotherapeutic properties by targeted delivery to aminopeptidase N (CD13). Nat. Biotechnol., 18: 1185-1190, 2000.[Medline]
. Cancer Res., 57: 1922-1928, 1997.
and a monoclonal antibody expressing a recurrent idiotype. Hybridoma, 12: 1-13, 1993.[Medline]
quantification by ELISA and bioassay: effects of TNF
-soluble TNF receptor (p55) complex dissociation during assay incubations. J. Immunol. Methods, 177: 191-198, 1994.[Medline]
: structure-activity relationships and mechanism of action on avidin pretargeted tumor cells. Cancer Res., 58: 3866-3872, 1998.
in mouse models. Cancer Res., 59: 2917-2923, 1999.
in combination with interferon-
and melphalan for nonresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 2653-2665, 1996.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Bieker, T. Kessler, C. Schwoppe, T. Padro, T. Persigehl, C. Bremer, J. Dreischaluck, A. Kolkmeyer, W. Heindel, R. M. Mesters, et al. Infarction of tumor vessels by NGR-peptide-directed targeting of tissue factor: experimental results and first-in-man experience Blood, May 14, 2009; 113(20): 5019 - 5027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gasparri, E. Jachetti, B. Colombo, A. Sacchi, F. Curnis, G.-P. Rizzardi, C. Traversari, M. Bellone, and A. Corti Critical role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in tumor resistance to repeated treatments with targeted IFN{gamma} Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2008; 7(12): 3859 - 3866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pastorino, D. Di Paolo, F. Piccardi, B. Nico, D. Ribatti, A. Daga, G. Baio, C. E. Neumaier, C. Brignole, M. Loi, et al. Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy of Clinical-Grade Vasculature-Targeted Liposomal Doxorubicin Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7320 - 7329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Corti, F. Curnis, W. Arap, and R. Pasqualini The neovasculature homing motif NGR: more than meets the eye Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2628 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oostendorp, K. Douma, T. M. Hackeng, A. Dirksen, M. J. Post, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, and W. H. Backes Quantitative Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis Using cNGR-Labeled Paramagnetic Quantum Dots Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7676 - 7683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Curnis, A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, R. Longhi, A. Bachi, C. Doglioni, C. Bordignon, C. Traversari, G.-P. Rizzardi, and A. Corti Isoaspartate-Glycine-Arginine: A New Tumor Vasculature-Targeting Motif Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7073 - 7082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mina-Osorio, B. Winnicka, C. O'Conor, C. L. Grant, L. K. Vogel, D. Rodriguez-Pinto, K. V. Holmes, E. Ortega, and L. H. Shapiro CD13 is a novel mediator of monocytic/endothelial cell adhesion J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2008; 84(2): 448 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Spitaleri, S. Mari, F. Curnis, C. Traversari, R. Longhi, C. Bordignon, A. Corti, G.-P. Rizzardi, and G. Musco Structural Basis for the Interaction of isoDGR with the RGD-binding Site of {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19757 - 19768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nishimura, S. Takahashi, H. Kamikatahira, Y. Kuroki, D. E. Jaalouk, S. O'Brien, E. Koivunen, W. Arap, R. Pasqualini, H. Nakayama, et al. Combinatorial Targeting of the Macropinocytotic Pathway in Leukemia and Lymphoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11752 - 11762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rangel, Y. Sun, L. Guzman-Rojas, M. G. Ozawa, J. Sun, R. J. Giordano, C. S. Van Pelt, P. T. Tinkey, R. R. Behringer, R. L. Sidman, et al. Impaired angiogenesis in aminopeptidase N-null mice PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4588 - 4593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Buehler, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, B. J. Stelt, T. M. Hackeng, B. H.G.J. Schrans-Stassen, A. Bennaghmouch, L. Hofstra, J. P.M. Cleutjens, A. Duijvestijn, M. B. Smeets, et al. cNGR: A Novel Homing Sequence for CD13/APN Targeted Molecular Imaging of Murine Cardiac Angiogenesis In Vivo Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2681 - 2687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meng, N. Ma, Z. Yan, W. Han, and Y. Zhang NGR Enhanced the Anti-Angiogenic Activity of tum-5 J. Biochem., August 1, 2006; 140(2): 299 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, C. Gallo-Stampino, S. Toma, F. Curnis, and A. Corti Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine with Tumor Vasculature-Targeted Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tan and X. Jiang The P Domain of Norovirus Capsid Protein Forms a Subviral Particle That Binds to Histo-Blood Group Antigen Receptors J. Virol., November 15, 2005; 79(22): 14017 - 14030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Fortin, L. Gera, J. Bouthillier, J. M. Stewart, A. Adam, and F. Marceau Endogenous Aminopeptidase N Decreases the Potency of Peptide Agonists and Antagonists of the Kinin B1 Receptors in the Rabbit Aorta J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1169 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Curnis, A. Gasparri, A. Sacchi, A. Cattaneo, F. Magni, and A. Corti Targeted Delivery of IFN{gamma} to Tumor Vessels Uncouples Antitumor from Counterregulatory Mechanisms Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 65(7): 2906 - 2913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Curnis, A. Gasparri, A. Sacchi, R. Longhi, and A. Corti Coupling Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} with {alpha}V Integrin Ligands Improves Its Antineoplastic Activity Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kehlen, U. Lendeckel, H. Dralle, J. Langner, and C. Hoang-Vu Biological Significance of Aminopeptidase N/CD13 in Thyroid Carcinomas Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8500 - 8506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pastorino, C. Brignole, D. Marimpietri, M. Cilli, C. Gambini, D. Ribatti, R. Longhi, T. M. Allen, A. Corti, and M. Ponzoni Vascular Damage and Anti-angiogenic Effects of Tumor Vessel-Targeted Liposomal Chemotherapy Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7400 - 7409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Colombo, F. Curnis, G. M. S. De Mori, A. Gasparri, C. Longoni, A. Sacchi, R. Longhi, and A. Corti Structure-Activity Relationships of Linear and Cyclic Peptides Containing the NGR Tumor-homing Motif J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47891 - 47897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Kolonin, R. Pasqualini, and W. Arap Teratogenicity induced by targeting a placental immunoglobulin transporter PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13055 - 13060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. McDonald and P. Baluk Significance of Blood Vessel Leakiness in Cancer Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5381 - 5385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |