Cancer Research 2010 AACR Elections  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curnis, F.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curnis, F.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
[Cancer Research 62, 867-874, February 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Differential Binding of Drugs Containing the NGR Motif to CD13 Isoforms in Tumor Vessels, Epithelia, and Myeloid Cells1

Flavio Curnis, Gianluigi Arrigoni, Angelina Sacchi, Lucia Fischetti, Wadih Arap, Renata Pasqualini and Angelo Corti2

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, DIBIT-San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy [F. C., G. A., A. S., L. F., A. C.], and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [W. A., R. P.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The NGR peptide motif is an aminopeptidase N (CD13) ligand that targets angiogenic blood vessels. NGR-containing peptides have proven useful for delivering cytotoxic drugs, proapoptotic peptides, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF) to tumor vasculature. Given that CD13 is not only expressed in the angiogenic endothelium but also in other cell types, the mechanism(s) for the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates remains elusive. We have examined the expression of CD13 in normal and neoplastic human tissues and cells by using two anti-CD13 monoclonal antibodies. The immunoreactivity patterns obtained with cultured cells and tissue sections from kidney, breast, and prostate carcinomas suggest that different CD13 forms are expressed in myeloid cells, epithelia, and tumor-associated blood vessels. Both, direct binding assays with a CNGRCG-TNF conjugate (NGR-TNF) and competitive inhibition experiments with anti-CD13 antibodies showed that a CD13 isoform expressed in tumor blood vessels could function as a vascular receptor for the NGR motif. In contrast, CD13 expressed in normal kidney and in myeloid cells failed to bind to NGR-TNF. Consistently with these results, neither murine125I-NGR-TNF nor 125I-TNF accumulated in normal organs containing CD13-expressing cells after administration to mice. These findings may explain the selectivity and the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates and may have important implications in the development of vascular-targeted therapies based on the NGR/CD13 system.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In vivo screening of peptide-phage libraries has proven to be a powerful tool for the discovery of ligands that selectively home to tumor vessels (1, 2, 3) . Among the targeting probes identified thus far, a peptide containing the NGR motif has been coupled to different anticancer compounds, such as doxorubicin, proapoptotic peptides, and TNF,3 and shown to enable targeted delivery of these drugs to tumor vessels (4, 5, 6) , e.g., the antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in animal models is 10–30 times stronger than that of TNF, whereas its toxicity is similar (5) . Evidence suggests that aminopeptidase N (CD13) is an important receptor targeted by NGR-containing conjugates (5 , 7) . However, in addition to endothelial cells of angiogenic vessels, most cells of myeloid origin, including monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, and their hematopoietic precursors, express CD13 (8, 9, 10) . This peptidase is also abundantly expressed in the brush border of epithelial cells from renal proximal tubules and small intestine, in prostatic epithelial cells, in bile duct canaliculi, in mast cells, and, in some cases, in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells (9 , 11, 12, 13, 14) . In most of these cells, CD13 immunoreactivity localizes to the cell membrane or in the apical part of epithelial cells (15) . However, cytoplasmic staining (15, 16, 17) and detection of soluble CD13 in human plasma have also been reported (18 , 19) . In addition, stromal fibrillar components of certain connective tissues contain CD13 immunoreactivity (20) . Given the widespread distribution of CD13 throughout the body, the mechanisms involved in the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates still remain unclear.

To analyze this specificity, we have investigated the expression of CD13 in various human tissues and tumors using two mAbs and studied the CD13/NGR-TNF interaction in tissues expressing high levels of CD13. In addition, we have studied the interaction of human NGR-TNF with normal and neoplastic tissues in vitro, as well as the biodistribution of radio-labeled murine NGR-TNF and TNF in a mouse model. Our findings suggest that different CD13 isoforms are expressed within tumor vessels, normal epithelia, and myeloid cells. Moreover, we show that NGR-TNF can bind to vessels within or close to tumor nodules but not to vessels in normal tissues and to epithelial cells of CD13-rich organs. On the basis of these observations, we propose that the mechanism involved in the tumor-homing properties of NGR-drug conjugates relies on recognition of a CD13 isoform selectively expressed within tumor associated vessels.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines and Reagents.
Mouse RMA-T lymphoma cells of C57BL/6 origin (21) were prepared and cultured as described previously (22) . Molt-4 cells (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) transfected with the human CD13 cDNA (CD13/Molt-4) were prepared as described (7 , 23) . THP-1 (acute monocytic leukemia) cells were obtained from Dr. F. Blasi (San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, Milan Italy). Human macrophages were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by standard techniques. mAb 13C03 (antihuman CD13, IgG1) was from Neomarkers, LabVision Corp. (Fremont, CA); mAb WM15 (antihuman CD13, IgG1) was from PharMingen (San Diego, CA); mAb JC/70A (antihuman CD31, IgG1) was from DAKO (Copenhagen, Denmark); mAb QBEND10 (antihuman CD34, IgG1) was from Serotec (Oxford, United Kingdom); mAb 78 (IgG1) was kindly supplied by Dr. E. Barbanti (Pharmacia-Upjohn, Milan, Italy). mAb 78 is an antihuman TNF antibody able to form stable complexes with soluble TNF (Kd: 3.2 x 10-10 M) and neutralize its interaction with membrane receptors (24) .

Human recombinant TNF and NGR-TNF (consisting of human TNF1–157 fused with the COOH terminus of CNGRCG) were prepared by recombinant DNA technology and purified from Escherichia coli cell extracts, as described (5) . The protein concentration was measured with a commercial protein quantification assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The in vitro cytolytic activity of NGR-TNF, estimated from a standard cytolytic assay with L-M mouse fibroblasts (25) , was (4.6 x 107) ± 0.4 units/mg, whereas that of purified human TNF was (5.45 x 107) ± 3.1 units/mg. The hydrodynamic volume of NGR-TNF was similar to that of TNF, a homotrimeric protein (26) , in gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex 75 HR column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The molecular mass of NGR-TNF subunits was 17938.0 ± 1.9 kDa (expected for NGR-TNF, 17939.4 kDa) by electrospray mass spectrometry (27) .

Complexes of human NGR-TNF and anti-TNF mAb 78 (termed NGR-TNF/78) were prepared by incubating a mixture of 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF and 1 µg/ml mAb 78, both in PBS containing 2% BSA for 20 min (20°C). A mixture of TNF and mAb 78 (termed TNF/78) was prepared in the same way using human TNF instead of NGR-TNF.

Recombinant murine IFN{gamma} fused with CNGRCG (NGR-IFN{gamma}) was prepared by recombinant DNA technology, essentially as described for NGR-TNF, and purified by immunoaffinity chromatography using an antimouse IFN{gamma}. Reducing and nonreducing SDS-PAGE of the final product showed a single band of 16 kDa. The synthetic peptide CgA (60–68), corresponding to the chromogranin A fragment 60–68, was prepared as described previously (28) .

Immunohistochemical Studies.
Surgical specimens of human tissues were obtained from the Department of Histopathology, San Raffaele H Scientific Institute. Sections (5–6 µm thick) of Bouin-fixed (4–6 h), paraffin-embedded specimens were prepared and adsorbed on polylysine-coated slides. Antigens were detected using the avidin-biotin complex method as follows: tissue sections were rehydrated using xylenes and a graded alcohol series, according to standard procedures. Tissue sections were placed in a vessel containing 1 mM EDTA and boiled for 7 min using a microwave oven (1000 W). The vessel was then refilled with 1 mM EDTA and boiled again for 5 min. The tissue sections were left to cool and incubated in PBS containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min to quench endogenous peroxidase. The samples were then rinsed with PBS and incubated with 100–200 µl of PBS containing 2% BSA (PBS-BSA; 1 h at room temperature), followed by the primary antibody or NGR-TNF/78 complex in PBS-BSA (overnight at 4°C). The slides were then washed three times (3 min each) with PBS and incubated with PBS-BSA containing 2% normal horse serum (PBS-BSA-normal horse serum; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 5 min. The solution was then replaced with 3 µg/ml biotinylated horse antimouse IgG (H+L; Vector Laboratories) in PBS-BSA-normal horse serum and further incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed again and incubated for 30 min with Vectastain Elite Reagent (Vector Laboratories) diluted 1:100 in PBS. A tablet of 3,3'-diamino-benzidine-tetrahydrochloride (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was then dissolved in 10 ml of deionized water containing 0.03% hydrogen peroxide, filtered through a 0.2-µm membrane, and overlaid on tissue sections for 5–10 min. The slides were washed as above and counterstained with Harris’ hematoxylin.

FACS Analysis.
Expression of CD13- and NGR-TNF-binding sites by cultured human macrophages (stimulated with 1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide for 16 h), THP-1, MOLT-4, and CD13/MOLT-4 cells was measured by FACS. Before analysis, the cells were preincubated with Dulbecco’s PBS (BioWhittaker) containing 30% human serum and 2% fetal bovine serum for 5 min, followed by 1 µg/ml WM15, 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78, or mAb 13C03 (diluted 1:2) in the same buffer (14 min, 4°C). After washing, the cells were incubated with a goat antimouse-FITC secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) diluted in the same buffer (14 min, 4°C) and fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS.

In Vivo Biodistribution Studies.
Murine 125I-NGR-TNF (1.41 µCi/µg) and 125I-TNF (1.8 µCi/µg) were prepared using Iodo-Gen precoated tubes (Pierce) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 125I-NGR-TNF or 125I-TNF was injected i.p. into C57BL/6 mice weighing 19–20 grams (Charles River Laboratories, Calco, Italy; 1 µg in 125 µl of 0.9% sodium chloride containing 0.1 mg/ml endotoxin-free human serum albumin). After 6 or 24 h, the animals were sacrificed and surgically dissected. The radioactivity in tissues was quantified by {gamma}-scintillation counting of 125I.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Different CD13 Forms Are Expressed within Tumor Vessels and Epithelia.
The expression of CD13 in normal and neoplastic tissues was evaluated by indirect immunohistochemistry using two anti-CD13 mAbs (13C03 and WM15). The immunoreactivity of these mAbs with a renal cell carcinoma and non-neoplastic kidney was first investigated. The 13C03 epitope, but not the WM15 epitope, was expressed in the brush border of the renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (Fig. 1, A and C)Citation . The weak cytoplasmic staining of kidney tubules by WM15 is not likely to be specific, as it was observed also when the antibody was omitted (data not shown). Although none of these epitopes were expressed by neoplastic cells (Fig. 1, B and D)Citation , both epitopes were expressed by stromal cells within and around the neoplastic lesion. The majority of stained cells in tumor stroma corresponds to endothelial cells, as suggested by similar staining patterns obtained with an anti-CD31 mAb, a well-known marker of endothelial cells (Fig. 1F)Citation . Of note, both epitopes were either not expressed or expressed very weakly in vessels of normal kidney, either within renal glomeruli or in connective tissue (Fig. 1, A and C)Citation . These results suggest that: (a) different antigenic forms of CD13 are expressed within normal epithelial cells and endothelial cells of tumor-associated vessels; (b) the 13C03 epitope is expressed on both isoforms; and (c) the WM15 epitope is differentially expressed on these isoforms.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Expression of CD13-, CD31-, and NGR-TNF-binding sites in normal (left panels) and neoplastic (right panels) renal tissues. Representative photomicrograph of tissues immunostained with mAb 13C03 (anti-CD13, diluted 1:2; A and B), 0.5 µg/ml WM15 (anti-CD13; C and D), JC/70A (anti-CD31, diluted 1:50; E and F), 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78 (G and H), 1 µg/ml TNF/78, (I and L), and 1 µg/ml mAb 78 (anti-TNF; M and N). g, kidney glomeruli; t, tumor cells; arrowheads, vessels. A–N, x400.

 
A CD13 Isoform Associated with Tumor Vessels Is a Receptor for NGR-TNF in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Next, we compared the expression of CD13 with that of NGR-binding sites by immunohistochemistry. Sections of normal kidney and renal cell carcinoma were incubated with human NGR-TNF precomplexed with the antihuman TNF mAb 78 (NGR-TNF/78). Controls with TNF/78 complexes or mAb 78 alone were also included. These complexes offer the advantage that they can be used as a single reagent in parallel with other antibodies. The staining patterns obtained with NGR-TNF/78 were very similar to those of WM15 and distinct from those of 13C03. Like WM15, NGR-TNF/78 interacted with tumor-associated vessels but not with the brush border of renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (Fig. 1, G and H)Citation . No binding was observed with controls, such as TNF/78 or mAb 78 alone (Fig. 1, I–N)Citation . These results indicate that: (a) the binding of mAb 78 to endogenous TNF is negligible; (b) the binding of TNF/78 to TNF receptors is undetectable; and (c) the binding of NGR-TNF/78 depends on the interaction of the NGR domain with an NGR receptor. Accordingly, the binding of NGR-TNF/78 was totally competed by coincubation with an NGR-IFN{gamma} conjugate (data not shown). These and the above results suggest that the NGR receptor and WM15 antigen colocalize in tumor-associated vessels.

To establish that the CD13 isoform recognized by the WM15 antibody is the one that is recognized by the NGR peptide, we performed competitive binding assays. Various reagents were used in these experiments. The binding of WM15 to tumor-associated vessels was inhibited by NGR-TNF, NGR-IFN{gamma}, and CNGRC, but not by other control reagents lacking the NGR motif (Table 1)Citation . In contrast, the binding of 13C03 to the brush border of renal proximal tubule epithelial cells was not competed by NGR-TNF.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Binding of antibodies to renal cell carcinoma vessels (mAb WM15) and proximal tubules of normal kidney (mAb 13C03), by immunohistochemistry, in the presence of various competitors

 
In summary, NGR-TNF interacts with a receptor expressed in renal cell carcinoma-associated vessels that corresponds to a CD13 isoform recognized by mAb WM15.

CD13 Expression in Breast and Prostate Cancer Metastasis and in Normal Tissues.
To test whether other tumors express the CD13 isoform recognized by NGR-TNF and mAb WM15, we analyzed human breast cancer tissue sections. In this case, an anti-CD34 mAb was used to identify vessels around tumor nodules (Fig. 2A)Citation and in normal adipose tissue in the same tissue section (Fig. 2B)Citation . NGR-TNF/78 recognized an antigen on the endothelial lining of vessels close to tumor nodules but did not stain normal vessels present in adipose tissue distant from the tumor (Fig. 2, C and D)Citation . Cytoplasmic staining of tumor cells with NGR-TNF/78 but not with TNF/78 or mAb 78 alone was also observed (Fig. 2, E–G)Citation . Binding to vessels and tumor cells was competed with NGR-IFN{gamma} (Fig. 2H)Citation , suggesting that in both cases, binding depended on the NGR domain.



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Expression of CD34- and NGR-TNF-binding sites in breast neoplastic tissues (left panels) and normal adipose tissue around the neoplastic nodules (right panels). Representative photomicrograph of tissues immunostained with QBEND10 (anti-CD34, diluted 1:100; A and B), 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78 (C and D), 1 µg/ml TNF/78 (E and F), mAb 78 (G), and a mixture of 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78 plus 50 µg/ml NGR-IFN{gamma} (H). t, tumor nodules; arrowheads, vessels. A, B, and D–H, x400; C, x630.

 
To investigate whether NGR-TNF can also bind to vessels associated with metastatic tumors, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of bone metastasis of human breast and prostate cancer. Analysis of breast cancer bone metastasis showed staining of vessels in a manner reminiscent of that of anti-CD13 mAbs (Fig. 3)Citation . The staining was not limited to endothelial cells, as other cells around large vessels, presumably pericytes and smooth muscle cells, were positive. Of note, staining of fibrillar components of fibrotic tissues occurred with both 13C03 and WM15, possibly related to a shed form of the membrane antigen. Interestingly, NGR-TNF/78 bound very weakly or not at all to these forms.



View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Expression of CD13- and NGR-TNF-binding sites in bone metastasis of breast cancer. Representative photomicrograph of tissues immunostained with 1 µg/ml mAb 78 (B), 1 µg/ml TNF/78 (C), 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78 (D), 13C03 (diluted 1:2) (E), and 1 µg/ml WM15 (F). Negative control without primary antibody (A). Arrows, vessels. A–C, E, and F, x400; D, x600.

 
Analysis of prostate cancer bone metastasis showed vessel staining after incubation with NGR-TNF/78 within and around the tumor nodules (Fig. 4)Citation . Additionally in this case, staining was not limited to the endothelial cells, as weak staining of neoplastic and stromal cells occurred with both NGR-TNF/78 and WM15.



View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Expression of CD34- and NGR-TNF-binding sites in bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Representative photomicrograph of tissues immunostained with 1 µg/ml mAb 78 (A), QBEND10 (diluted 1:100; B and C), 1 µg/ml WM15 (D), 1 µg/ml TNF/78 (E), and 1 µg/ml NGR-TNF/78 (F). t, tumor cells; arrowheads, vessels. A and B, x200; C–F, x400.

 
Normal vessels in kidney, liver, small intestine, and placenta tissue sections were not stained by NGR-TNF/78 (data not shown).

In conclusion, the results suggest that human NGR-TNF can bind to a receptor expressed in vessels within or close to human primary and metastatic tumors but not to normal tissues.

Characterization of CD13 in Myeloid and Lymphoid Cells.
To further characterize the CD13 isoform recognized by 13C03, WM15, and NGR-TNF/78, we investigated the binding of these reagents to myeloid and lymphoid cells. FACS analysis showed that WM15 recognizes THP-1 cells (acute monocytic leukemia) and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human macrophages but not Molt-4 cells (acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Fig. 5Citation ). In contrast, neither 13C03 nor NGR-TNF/78 immunoreacted with these cell lines. Notably, these reagents failed to react with Molt-4 cells transfected with the human CD13 cDNA. In addition, NGR-TNF (50 µg/ml) did not inhibit the binding of WM15 to THP-1 cells (data not shown). The lack of detectable binding of NGR-TNF/78 to CD13/Molt-4 cells apparently contrasts with the results of previous studies showing that these cells bind phages expressing the CNGRC peptide on their surface (7) . An explanation for this discrepancy is that these cells could express a very low fraction of CD13 molecules able to bind both NGR-phages and NGR-TNF/78. Whereas bound phage particles could be easily detected, even when present in low numbers, the binding of low amounts of NGR-TNF is undetectable by FACS. In addition, we have found that immunodetection of phage particles is at least two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than colony counting in bacterial infection assay.4 Thus, although a number of phages can be detected as binders compared with controls, the amount of NGR-binding CD13 isoform is quite low. In any case, the high level of CD13 expression and the lack of detectable binding of NGR-TNF strongly suggest that most CD13 molecules on these cells are unable to bind NGR-TNF.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Expression of CD13- and NGR-TNF-binding sites by cultured human macrophages (stimulated with 1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide for 16 h), THP-1, MOLT-4, and CD13/MOLT-4 cells, as measured by FACS.

 
Granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes present in the vessel lumen of kidney, breast, and prostate tissue sections, as well as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, were not stained by NGR-TNF/78 in immunohistochemistry assays. Of note, NGR-TNF/78 and WM15 but not TNF/78 immunoreacted with scattered granular cells, presumably mastocytes, within the neoplastic tissues (data not shown).

Biodistribution of 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF in Mice.
To rule out the possibility that CD13 isoforms expressed by epithelial cells in kidney or other CD13-rich organs bind NGR-TNF in vivo, we examined the biodistribution of radiolabeled murine NGR-TNF and TNF in a mouse model. 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF (1 µg each) were administered to C57BL/6 mice. The kidney:blood ratios of 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF 6 or 24 h after administration were similar, suggesting that NGR-TNF does not accumulate in the kidney (Fig. 6)Citation . This finding agrees with the results of the above in vitro studies showing a lack of binding of NGR-TNF to CD13 isoforms expressed in normal kidney. Similarly, the tissue:blood ratios of other organs, including small intestine, liver, bone, lung, heart, muscle, and spleen, were similar, indicating that NGR-TNF does not accumulate in these organs.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Biodistribution of murine 125I-NGR-TNF and 125I-TNF in C57BL/6 mice. Shown is the amount of radioactivity in various organs 6 h after the injection of 1 µg of protein/animal (5 mice/group in two separate experiments; A and B) and 24 h after injection (12 mice/group; C).

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
NGR-containing peptides, identified by in vivo screening of phage libraries, have proven useful for preparing anticancer drugs that target tumor vessels. Previous studies showed that aminopeptidase N (CD13) is an important receptor for NGR-containing conjugates (7) . This protein is an abundant myeloid differentiation antigen that is also expressed by many nonhematopoietic cell types. For example, in the intestinal brush border, aminopeptidase N constitutes 6–8% of the total proteins and is thought to play an important role in protein digestion (9) . Other studies have shown a strong expression of CD13 in the brush border of renal proximal tubules (14) . Accordingly, using mAb 13C03, we observed marked expression of CD13 antigen in the apical part of epithelial cells of proximal tubules in normal kidney. Nevertheless, the results of immunohistochemical and biodistribution studies indicate that NGR-TNF does not bind to these cells in vitro and does not accumulate in the kidneys or other CD13-rich organs in vivo. These data suggest that NGR-drug conjugates bind receptors with a more restricted expression pattern than CD13. Immunohistochemical analysis of normal and neoplastic tissues with anti-CD13 antibodies that recognize different epitopes (13C03 and WM15) showed that different CD13 isoforms are expressed in normal epithelial cells, tumor-associated vessels, and myeloid cells. Moreover, the results of direct and competitive binding experiments with NGR-TNF and anti-CD13 mAbs suggest that a tumor vessel-related CD13 isoform but not those associated with epithelial and myeloid cells functions as an NGR receptor.

The binding of WM15 to tissues but not 13C03 was competed with NGR-TNF or CNGRC peptide. This suggests that the NGR binding site sterically overlaps, at least partially, with the WM15 epitope on human CD13. The steric overlapping and the similar staining pattern observed with WM15 and NGR-TNF in tissue sections do not necessarily indicate that the structural determinants of WM15 epitope and NGR binding site are identical or have the same accessibility in all tissues. Indeed, we found that NGR-TNF does not recognize WM15-positive myeloid cells, by FACS analysis, suggesting that the structures of NGR binding site and WM15 epitope are different or differentially accessible in these cells. Thus, the CD13 isoform that binds NGR-TNF is likely a subpopulation of WM15-antigenic forms.

The selectivity of NGR-TNF for tumor-associated endothelial cells was not absolute. Other cells present in the tumor stroma and peri-nodular connective tissue, likely fibroblasts and mastocytes, were also stained. In addition, we observed a weak reactivity of NGR-TNF with breast and prostate cancer cells. Because it is known that breast cancer cells usually express CD13 (14) , it is possible that the staining of tumor cells was related to expression of CD13. We do not know whether these cells are accessible to systemically administered NGR-TNF. If they are, they may represent an additional homing site for targeted delivery of NGR-drug conjugates to tumors. In any case, expression of CD13 by tumor cells is not a prerequisite for tumor targeting, because we have shown previously that even the growth of CD13-negative tumor cells in vivo is efficiently inhibited by NGR-TNF when the tumors are well established and vascularized (5) .

It is not known what the structural determinants responsible for differential binding of anti-CD13 mAbs and NGR-TNF to CD13 isoforms are. CD13 is synthesized as a 130-kDa intracellular precursor of 967 amino acids and post-translationally modified in the Golgi to produce a 150–240 kDa mature cell surface molecule (13 , 29 , 30) . In the mature protein, 25–30% of the molecular weight is carbohydrate. Previous investigations have shown that differential or incomplete utilization of O-glycosylation sites results in at least five isoforms that are differentially recognized by antibodies, likely attributable to variable masking of protein epitopes (31) . We have found that enzymatic deglycosylation of soluble CD13, isolated from human placenta, with O-glycanase and neuraminidase does not increase the binding of NGR-TNF in various ELISA and ligand blotting assays (data not shown). Moreover, treatment of normal kidney tissue sections with these enzymes did not increase to binding of NGR-TNF to the brush border of the epithelial cells (data not shown). These results argue against the hypothesis that carbohydrates mask the NGR binding site in nonfunctional CD13 isoforms. As alternative hypotheses, it is possible that the differential reactivity of NGR-TNF with different cells is related to different conformations of CD13, e.g., previous studies showed that the binding of CD13 to natural peptide substrates or antibodies induces conformational changes and exposure of cryptic epitopes (32) . Alternatively, association with other proteins or elements present in the tumor microenvironment or in tissues can cause differential reactivity or availability to NGR-TNF. Additional work is necessary to clarify this point.

It has been reported that the biological function of CD13 varies depending on tissue microenvironment. CD13 exists as a membrane bound or a soluble form, both of which catalyze the removal of NH2-terminal residues, preferentially neutral, from small peptides (9) . It has been suggested that CD13 plays a role in antigen processing (33) , in neuropeptide and cytokine degradation (34 , 35) , in cell cycle control and differentiation (13 , 36 , 37) , and in tumor invasion and extracellular matrix degradation (38 , 39) . Two recent reports showed that CD13 is also important in angiogenesis and is activated by angiogenic signals (7 , 40) . The presence of the NGR binding site in tumor vessels could be required for the selective interaction of this site with other compounds potentially mimicked by NGR during angiogenesis and tumor invasion. NGR-TNF could be a valuable tool for the identification of this CD13 isoform, as well as for the characterization of its biological function.

The observation that human NGR-TNF can bind vessels in human neoplastic tissue section could also have important clinical implications. Previously, we showed that systemically administered murine NGR-TNF is 10–30 times more efficient than murine TNF in decreasing the tumor burden of animals bearing well-established lymphomas, but both TNF and NGR-TNF were equally effective in animals with freshly implanted, and hence avascular, tumors (5) . Coadministration of murine NGR-TNF with an antimurine CD13 antibody or a CNGRC peptide markedly decreased its antitumor effects, suggesting that the NGR domain of NGR-TNF can interact with murine CD13. The results of the present work suggest that NGR-TNF can also bind human CD13. Human NGR-TNF might have, therefore, more potent antitumor properties than human TNF in patients with vascularized tumors, as observed previously with murine TNF in mice. Indeed, several lines of evidence suggest that the antitumor activity of TNF largely depends on selective obstruction and damage to tumor-associated vessels (41, 42, 43, 44, 45) . Because the clinical use of TNF as an anticancer drug is limited to locoregional treatments attributable to dose-limiting systemic toxicity, it is possible that targeted delivery of TNF to vessels via the NGR domain may allow systemic and/or locoregional treatment of patients with lower toxicity and stronger antitumor effects.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Antonella Monno and Corazon Bucana for excellent technical advice and Maurilio Ponzoni for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro and Ministero della Sanità of Italy (Ricerca Finalizzata). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, DIBIT-San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39-02-26-43-48-02; Fax: 39-02-26-43-47-86; E-mail: corti.angelo{at}hsr.it Back

3 The abbreviations used are: TNF, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}; mAb, monoclonal antibody; NGR-TNF, CNGRCG-tumor necrosis factor; FACS, fluorescent-activated cell sorter. Back

4 R. Pasqualini and W. Arap, unpublished observations. Back

Received 7/18/01. Accepted 11/30/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Pasqualini R., Koivunen E., Ruoslahti E. {alpha}v Integrins as receptors for tumor targeting by circulating ligands. Nat. Biotechnol., 15: 542-546, 1997.[Medline]
  2. Koivunen E., Arap W., Rajotte D., Lahdenranta J., Pasqualini R. Identification of receptor ligands with phage display peptide libraries. J. Nucl. Med., 40: 883-888, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Koivunen E., Arap W., Valtanen H., Rainisalo A., Medina O. P., Heikkila P., Kantor C., Gahmberg C. G., Salo T., Konttinen Y. T., Sorsa T., Ruoslahti E., Pasqualini R. Tumor targeting with a selective gelatinase inhibitor. Nat. Biotechnol., 17: 768-774, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Arap W., Pasqualini R., Ruoslahti E. Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science (Wash. DC), 279: 377-380, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Curnis F., Sacchi A., Borgna L., Magni F., Gasparri A., Corti A. Enhancement of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} antitumor immunotherapeutic properties by targeted delivery to aminopeptidase N (CD13). Nat. Biotechnol., 18: 1185-1190, 2000.[Medline]
  6. Ellerby H. M., Arap W., Ellerby L. M., Kain R., Andrusiak R., Rio G. D., Krajewski S., Lombardo C. R., Rao R., Ruoslahti E., Bredesen D. E., Pasqualini R. Anticancer activity of targeted pro-apoptotic peptides. Nat. Med., 5: 1032-1038, 1999.[Medline]
  7. Pasqualini R., Koivunen E., Kain R., Lahdenranta J., Sakamoto M., Stryhn A., Ashmun R. A., Shapiro L. H., Arap W., Ruoslahti E. Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res., 60: 722-727, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chen H., Kinzer C. A., Paul W. E. p161, a murine membrane protein expressed on mast cells and some macrophages, is mouse CD13/aminopeptidase N. J. Immunol., 157: 2593-2600, 1996.[Abstract]
  9. Riemann D., Kehlen A., Langner J. CD13: not just a marker in leukemia typing. Immunol. Today, 20: 83-88, 1999.[Medline]
  10. Drexler H. G. Classification of acute myeloid leukemias: a comparison of FAB and immunophenotyping. Leukemia, 1: 697-705, 1987.[Medline]
  11. Taylor A. Aminopeptidases: structure and function. FASEB J., 7: 290-298, 1993.[Abstract]
  12. Shipp M. A., Look A. T. Hematopoietic differentiation antigens that are membrane-associated enzymes: cutting is the key. Blood, 82: 1052-1070, 1993.[Free Full Text]
  13. Razak K., Newland A. C. The significance of aminopeptidases and haematopoietic cell differentiation. Blood Rev., 6: 243-250, 1992.[Medline]
  14. Dixon J., Kaklamanis L., Turley H., Hickson I. D., Leek R. D., Harris A. L., Gatter K. C. Expression of aminopeptidase-n (CD 13) in normal tissues and malignant neoplasms of epithelial and lymphoid origin. J. Clin. Pathol. (Lond.), 47: 43-47, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Atherton A. J., Monaghan P., Warburton M. J., Gusterson B. A. Immunocytochemical localization of the ectoenzyme aminopeptidase N in the human breast. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 40: 705-710, 1992.[Abstract]
  16. Mechtersheimer G., Moller P. Expression of aminopeptidase N (CD13) in mesenchymal tumors. Am. J. Pathol., 137: 1215-1222, 1990.[Abstract]
  17. Bogenrieder T., Finstad C. L., Freeman R. H., Papandreou C. N., Scher H. I., Albino A. P., Reuter V. E., Nanus D. M. Expression and localization of aminopeptidase A, aminopeptidase N, and dipeptidyl peptidase IV in benign and malignant human prostate tissue. Prostate, 33: 225-232, 1997.[Medline]
  18. Tokioka-Terao M., Hiwada K., Kokubu T. Purification and characterization of aminopeptidase N from human plasma. Enzyme (Basel), 32: 65-75, 1984.[Medline]
  19. Favaloro E. J., Browning T., Facey D. CD13 (GP150; aminopeptidase-N): predominant functional activity in blood is localized to plasma and is not cell-surface associated. Exp. Hematol. (Charlottesville, Va), 21: 1695-1701, 1993.[Medline]
  20. Bordessoule D., Jones M., Gatter K. C., Mason D. Y. Immunohistological patterns of myeloid antigens: tissue distribution of CD13, CD14, CD16, CD31, CD36, CD65, CD66, and CD67. Br. J. Haematol., 83: 370-383, 1993.[Medline]
  21. Ljunggren H. G., Karre K. Host resistance directed selectively against H-2-deficient lymphoma variants. Analysis of the mechanism. J. Exp. Med., 162: 1745-1759, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Moro M., Pelagi M., Fulci G., Paganelli G., Dellabona P., Casorati G., Siccardi A. G., Corti A. Tumor cell targeting with antibody-avidin complexes and biotinylated tumor necrosis factor {alpha}. Cancer Res., 57: 1922-1928, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ashmun R. A., Look A. T. Metalloprotease activity of CD13/aminopeptidase N on the surface of human myeloid cells. Blood, 75: 462-469, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Barbanti E., Corti A., Ghislieri M., Casero D., Rifaldi B., Portello C., Breme U., Trizio D., Marcucci F. Mode of interaction between tumor necrosis factor {alpha} and a monoclonal antibody expressing a recurrent idiotype. Hybridoma, 12: 1-13, 1993.[Medline]
  25. Corti A., Poiesi C., Merli S., Cassani G. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) {alpha} quantification by ELISA and bioassay: effects of TNF {alpha}-soluble TNF receptor (p55) complex dissociation during assay incubations. J. Immunol. Methods, 177: 191-198, 1994.[Medline]
  26. Smith R. A., Baglioni C. The active form of tumor necrosis factor is a trimer. J. Biol. Chem., 262: 6951-6954, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Corti A., Gasparri A., Sacchi A., Curnis F., Sangregorio R., Colombo B., Siccardi A. G., Magni F. Tumor targeting with biotinylated tumor necrosis factor {alpha}: structure-activity relationships and mechanism of action on avidin pretargeted tumor cells. Cancer Res., 58: 3866-3872, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ratti S., Curnis F., Longhi R., Colombo B., Gasparri A., Magni F., Manera E., Metz-Boutigue M. H., Corti A. Structure-activity relationships of chromogranin A in cell adhesion. Identification and characterization of an adhesion site for fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 29257-29263, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Look A. T., Ashmun R. A., Shapiro L. H., Peiper S. C. Human myeloid plasma membrane glycoprotein CD13 (gp150) is identical to aminopeptidase N. J. Clin. Investig., 83: 1299-1307, 1989.
  30. Look A. T., Peiper S. C., Rebentisch M. B., Ashmun R. A., Roussel M. F., Rettenmier C. W., Sherr C. J. Transfer and expression of the gene encoding a human myeloid membrane antigen (gp150). J. Clin. Investig., 75: 569-579, 1985.
  31. O’Connell P. J., Gerkis V., d’Apice A. J. Variable O-glycosylation of CD13 (aminopeptidase N). J. Biol. Chem., 266: 4593-4597, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Xu Y., Wellner D., Scheinberg D. A. Cryptic and regulatory epitopes in CD13/aminopeptidase N. Exp. Hematol. (Charlottesville, Va), 25: 521-529, 1997.[Medline]
  33. Stryhn-Hansen A., Noren O., Sjostrom H., Werdelin O. A mouse aminopeptidase N is a marker for antigen-presenting cells and appears to be co-expressed with major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Eur. J. Immunol., 23: 2358-2364, 1993.[Medline]
  34. Matsas R., Stephenson S. L., Hryszko J., Kenny A. J., Turner A. J. The metabolism of neuropeptides. Phase separation of synaptic membrane preparations with Triton X-114 reveals the presence of aminopeptidase N. Biochem. J., 231: 445-449, 1985.[Medline]
  35. Hoffmann T., Faust J., Neubert K., Ansorge S. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD 26) and aminopeptidase N (CD 13) catalyzed hydrolysis of cytokines and peptides with N-terminal cytokine sequences. FEBS Lett., 336: 61-64, 1993.[Medline]
  36. Kenny A. J., O’Hare M. J., Gusterson B. A. Cell-surface peptidases as modulators of growth and differentiation. Lancet, 2: 785-787, 1989.[Medline]
  37. Lendeckel U., Arndt M., Frank K., Wex T., Ansorge S. Role of alanyl aminopeptidase in growth and function of human T cells (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med., 4: 17-27, 1999.[Medline]
  38. Saiki I., Fujii H., Yoneda J., Abe F., Nakajima M., Tsuruo T., Azuma I. Role of aminopeptidase N (CD13) in tumor-cell invasion and extracellular matrix degradation. Int. J. Cancer, 54: 137-143, 1993.[Medline]
  39. Menrad A., Speicher D., Wacker J., Herlyn M. Biochemical and functional characterization of aminopeptidase N expressed by human melanoma cells. Cancer Res., 53: 1450-1455, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bhagwat S. V., Lahdenranta J., Giordano R., Arap W., Pasqualini R., Shapiro L. H. CD13/APN is activated by angiogenic signals and is essential for capillary tube formation. Blood, 97: 652-659, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Corti A., Marcucci F. Tumour necrosis factor: strategies for improving the therapeutic index. J. Drug Target., 5: 403-413, 1998.[Medline]
  42. Gasparri A., Moro M., Curnis F., Sacchi A., Pagano S., Veglia F., Casorati G., Siccardi A. G., Dellabona P., Corti A. Tumor pretargeting with avidin improves the therapeutic index of biotinylated tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in mouse models. Cancer Res., 59: 2917-2923, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Nawroth P. P., Stern D. M. Modulation of endothelial cell hemostatic properties by tumor necrosis factor. J. Exp. Med., 163: 740-745, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Nawroth P., Handley D., Matsueda G., De Waal R., Gerlach H., Blohm D., Stern D. Tumor necrosis factor/cachectin-induced intravascular fibrin formation in meth A fibrosarcomas. J. Exp. Med., 168: 637-647, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Eggermont A. M., Schraffordt-Koops H., Lienard D., Kroon B. B., van Geel A. N., Hoekstra H. J., Lejeune F. J. Isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in combination with interferon-{gamma} and melphalan for nonresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 2653-2665, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Bieker, T. Kessler, C. Schwoppe, T. Padro, T. Persigehl, C. Bremer, J. Dreischaluck, A. Kolkmeyer, W. Heindel, R. M. Mesters, et al.
Infarction of tumor vessels by NGR-peptide-directed targeting of tissue factor: experimental results and first-in-man experience
Blood, May 14, 2009; 113(20): 5019 - 5027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. M. Gasparri, E. Jachetti, B. Colombo, A. Sacchi, F. Curnis, G.-P. Rizzardi, C. Traversari, M. Bellone, and A. Corti
Critical role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in tumor resistance to repeated treatments with targeted IFN{gamma}
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2008; 7(12): 3859 - 3866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Pastorino, D. Di Paolo, F. Piccardi, B. Nico, D. Ribatti, A. Daga, G. Baio, C. E. Neumaier, C. Brignole, M. Loi, et al.
Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy of Clinical-Grade Vasculature-Targeted Liposomal Doxorubicin
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7320 - 7329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Corti, F. Curnis, W. Arap, and R. Pasqualini
The neovasculature homing motif NGR: more than meets the eye
Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2628 - 2635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Oostendorp, K. Douma, T. M. Hackeng, A. Dirksen, M. J. Post, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, and W. H. Backes
Quantitative Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis Using cNGR-Labeled Paramagnetic Quantum Dots
Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7676 - 7683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Curnis, A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, R. Longhi, A. Bachi, C. Doglioni, C. Bordignon, C. Traversari, G.-P. Rizzardi, and A. Corti
Isoaspartate-Glycine-Arginine: A New Tumor Vasculature-Targeting Motif
Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7073 - 7082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
P. Mina-Osorio, B. Winnicka, C. O'Conor, C. L. Grant, L. K. Vogel, D. Rodriguez-Pinto, K. V. Holmes, E. Ortega, and L. H. Shapiro
CD13 is a novel mediator of monocytic/endothelial cell adhesion
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2008; 84(2): 448 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Spitaleri, S. Mari, F. Curnis, C. Traversari, R. Longhi, C. Bordignon, A. Corti, G.-P. Rizzardi, and G. Musco
Structural Basis for the Interaction of isoDGR with the RGD-binding Site of {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19757 - 19768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Nishimura, S. Takahashi, H. Kamikatahira, Y. Kuroki, D. E. Jaalouk, S. O'Brien, E. Koivunen, W. Arap, R. Pasqualini, H. Nakayama, et al.
Combinatorial Targeting of the Macropinocytotic Pathway in Leukemia and Lymphoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11752 - 11762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Rangel, Y. Sun, L. Guzman-Rojas, M. G. Ozawa, J. Sun, R. J. Giordano, C. S. Van Pelt, P. T. Tinkey, R. R. Behringer, R. L. Sidman, et al.
Impaired angiogenesis in aminopeptidase N-null mice
PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4588 - 4593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Buehler, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, B. J. Stelt, T. M. Hackeng, B. H.G.J. Schrans-Stassen, A. Bennaghmouch, L. Hofstra, J. P.M. Cleutjens, A. Duijvestijn, M. B. Smeets, et al.
cNGR: A Novel Homing Sequence for CD13/APN Targeted Molecular Imaging of Murine Cardiac Angiogenesis In Vivo
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2681 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
J. Meng, N. Ma, Z. Yan, W. Han, and Y. Zhang
NGR Enhanced the Anti-Angiogenic Activity of tum-5
J. Biochem., August 1, 2006; 140(2): 299 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, C. Gallo-Stampino, S. Toma, F. Curnis, and A. Corti
Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine with Tumor Vasculature-Targeted Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 175 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Tan and X. Jiang
The P Domain of Norovirus Capsid Protein Forms a Subviral Particle That Binds to Histo-Blood Group Antigen Receptors
J. Virol., November 15, 2005; 79(22): 14017 - 14030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J.-P. Fortin, L. Gera, J. Bouthillier, J. M. Stewart, A. Adam, and F. Marceau
Endogenous Aminopeptidase N Decreases the Potency of Peptide Agonists and Antagonists of the Kinin B1 Receptors in the Rabbit Aorta
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1169 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Curnis, A. Gasparri, A. Sacchi, A. Cattaneo, F. Magni, and A. Corti
Targeted Delivery of IFN{gamma} to Tumor Vessels Uncouples Antitumor from Counterregulatory Mechanisms
Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 65(7): 2906 - 2913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Curnis, A. Gasparri, A. Sacchi, R. Longhi, and A. Corti
Coupling Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} with {alpha}V Integrin Ligands Improves Its Antineoplastic Activity
Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 565 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Kehlen, U. Lendeckel, H. Dralle, J. Langner, and C. Hoang-Vu
Biological Significance of Aminopeptidase N/CD13 in Thyroid Carcinomas
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8500 - 8506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Pastorino, C. Brignole, D. Marimpietri, M. Cilli, C. Gambini, D. Ribatti, R. Longhi, T. M. Allen, A. Corti, and M. Ponzoni
Vascular Damage and Anti-angiogenic Effects of Tumor Vessel-Targeted Liposomal Chemotherapy
Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7400 - 7409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Colombo, F. Curnis, G. M. S. De Mori, A. Gasparri, C. Longoni, A. Sacchi, R. Longhi, and A. Corti
Structure-Activity Relationships of Linear and Cyclic Peptides Containing the NGR Tumor-homing Motif
J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47891 - 47897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. G. Kolonin, R. Pasqualini, and W. Arap
Teratogenicity induced by targeting a placental immunoglobulin transporter
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13055 - 13060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. M. McDonald and P. Baluk
Significance of Blood Vessel Leakiness in Cancer
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5381 - 5385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curnis, F.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curnis, F.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online