| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Departments of Molecular and Cellular Oncology [C. J. B., F. L., M. M., Z. Y., R. K.] and Pathology [A. A. S.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In many eukaryotic cells, the Ras protein represents one of the major signaling components of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and cytoskeleton changes (5) . Signals from receptor tyrosine kinases such as HER2 activate Ras via guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which essentially convert the inactive GDP-bound form of Ras to the active GTP-bound Ras. Activation of Ras stimulates its downstream effectors, including the Raf/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase that are involved in growth and survival functions (6) . Naturally occurring mutations in Ras protein that are associated with the persistence of GTP-bound Ras lead to nonattenuation of growth signals in the absence of receptor-generated signals and eventually to oncogenic transformation (6) . Ras GAP inactivates Ras by promoting the conversion of the active GTP-bound Ras to the inactive GDP-bound Ras (7) . Therefore, GAP is thought to act as a physiological negative regulator of Ras signaling. In growth factor-stimulated cells, GAP is phosphorylated and interacts with cytoplasmic proteins and phosphorylated receptor tyrosine kinases. Furthermore, the SH3 domain of GAP has been shown to be essential for Ras signaling (8) . GAP also promotes stress fiber formation by stimulating Rho activity, and blockage of the SH3 domain of GAP by a monoclonal antibody inhibits growth factor-triggered Rho-dependent cytoskeleton changes and cell survival (9 , 10) . Thus GAP is a critical effector of Ras.
Recent studies have suggested a role of G3BP, the GAP SH3 domain-binding protein, in the Ras signal transduction pathway. G3BP can interact efficiently with GAP in exponentially growing cells with activated Ras (11) . G3BP is a ubiquitously expressed Mr 68,000 protein with several unusual motifs. The COOH-terminal region of G3BP contains two ribonucleoprotein motifs that are characteristic of RNA-binding proteins (12) and is thus implicated in RNA processing. Accordingly, G3BP also possesses phosphorylation-dependent RNase activity (11) and has been implicated in cleavage of the 3' untranslated region of c-myc mRNA stimulating c-myc mRNA turnover. The integrity of the RNA-binding domain of G3BP has been shown to be essential for its function to promote the S phase of the cell cycle (13) . In addition, G3BP has been shown to be identical to human DNA helicase VIII, an enzyme with a role in DNA replication, repair, and recombination (14) , that was cloned in a different context. Recently, G3BP has been found to be up-regulated in proliferating retinal pigment epithelial cells (15) and overexpressed in human tumor cell lines and tumors (13) . Together, current evidence suggests that G3BP may serve as an important downstream effector of Ras signaling and potentially influence RNA metabolism and DNA replication in a Ras-GTP-dependent manner. Very little is known, however, about potential growth factor regulation of G3BP in human malignancies. This report presents for the first time data that G3BP expression and phosphorylation, GAP interaction, and its nuclear functions are positively regulated by HRG, a growth factor with diverse functions in breast cancer cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differential Display Analysis.
SKBR3 cells were serum-starved for 24 h and then treated with 1 nM HRG for 8 h. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). Differential display was performed as described previously (18)
using the Delta Differential Display kit. Amplified DNA was separated on an agarose gel, and the bands were purified and cloned into a PCR2.1 vector using the TOPO cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Five to 10 independent clones were isolated, miniprepared, and sequenced at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Core facility. Sequences were compared with GenBank sequences using a BLAST search program.
Northern Blot Hybridization.
Total cytoplasmic RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent, and 20 µg of RNA were analyzed via Northern hybridization using a 1752-nuclotide cDNA of human G3BP cDNA sequence corresponding to nucleotides 231774. rRNA (28 S and 18 S) was used to assess the integrity of the RNA, and the blots were routinely reprobed with human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA for RNA loading and transfer control as described previously (18)
. In some experiments, cells were treated with 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (a translational inhibitor; Sigma Chemical Co.) or 10 µg/ml actinomycin D (a transcriptional inhibitor; Sigma Chemical Co.) in the presence or absence of HRG treatment (1 nM).
Cell Labeling, Cell Extracts, and Immunoprecipitation.
An equal number of cells was metabolically labeled for 48 h with 100 µCi/ml [32P]ATP in methionine-free medium containing 2% dialyzed fetal bovine serum in the presence or absence of the indicated treatments. Cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with 100 mM NaF, 200 mM NaVO5, and 1x protease mixture (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) on ice for 15 min. Cell lysates containing equal trichloroacetic acid-precipitated counts were immunoprecipitated with the desired antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (16)
.
Tissue Samples and Western Blotting.
Mouse tissue samples were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen as described previously (18)
. Human breast tissue samples were obtained from a tissue bank maintained by Dr. A. Sahin (The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Breast Cancer Core Pathology Laboratory). Tumor ER status for Fig. 2C
was determined by the Surgical Pathology Core Facility at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Specimens from patients who had undergone surgery for breast cancer were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C (19)
. Thawed tissue samples were homogenized in Triton X-100 lysis buffer [20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% deoxycholate (v/w), 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM NaVO5, and protease inhibitor mixture], and equal amounts of protein were analyzed by Western blotting. The protein vinculin was used routinely as a loading control.
|
Immunofluorescence and Confocal Imaging.
SKBR3 cells were plated on glass coverslips in 6-well culture plates. When the cells were approximately 50% confluent, they were serum-starved for 48 h. Separate wells were treated with 1 nM HRG for 0, 30, or 60 min, and then the cells were rinsed in PBS and fixed in cold 100% methanol for 10 min. After fixation, cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining of T7-G3BP and either GAP or acetylated histone H3, and then they were counterstained with ToPro3. Fluorescence labeling was visualized using a Zeiss LSM 510 microscope and a x40 objective.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-33P]dCTP and subjected to PCR. A total of 90 reactions were performed using nine 3' degenerate oligodeoxythymidylic acid primers and ten 5' random primers for each treatment. Analysis of PAGE gels showed amplification of a number of bands ranging from 100 nucleotides to 1800 nucleotides, and a majority of the bands were of equal intensity. Using these bands as internal controls, we analyzed for bands with differences in intensity in the HRG-treated lane. This analysis resulted in the identification of a 1752-bp differential band induced by HRG (Fig. 1A)
|
G3BP Expression in Murine Tissues and Human Breast Cancer.
To explore the significance of G3BP in human breast cancer progression, we examined G3BP protein expression levels in normal mouse tissues and in human breast tumors. Previous reports have indicated that G3BP is ubiquitously expressed (12)
. However, when a multiorgan murine tissue protein blot was probed for G3BP expression, high levels of G3BP protein were expressed in the liver, heart, lung, uterus, and testes, but extremely low levels of G3BP protein were expressed in several other organs (Fig. 2A)
. The significance of this tissue-specific expression remains to be investigated. Because G3BP expression was increased in HER2-overexpressing cells (Fig. 2B)
and was highly inducible in breast cancer cells (Fig. 1C)
, we investigated whether G3BP protein expression was altered in paired normal human breast epithelium and breast carcinoma biopsy samples (18
, 19)
. As shown in Fig. 2C
, G3BP expression was dramatically increased in eight of eight tumors as compared with the adjacent normal tissue, which showed little or no G3BP expression. These same tumor samples also had elevated levels of the HER2 receptor (Fig. 2C)
, opening the possibility of growth factor-mediated up-regulation of G3BP in these tumors. Blots were reprobed for vinculin as a loading control. Finally, we examined a possible relationship between tumor ER status and G3BP up-regulation (Fig. 2D)
. There was no apparent correlation in this sample set. Additional studies using a large number of clinical samples are needed to confirm these findings.
HRG-dependent Phosphorylation of G3BP.
G3BP RNase activity is phosphorylation dependent both in vitro and in vivo (11)
. To determine whether G3BP phosphorylation was altered by HRG, serum-starved SKBR3 cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphoric acid for 24 h and then stimulated with HRG for 1 h. Results indicate a large induction of G3BP phosphorylation after HRG treatment (Fig. 3A)
. This HRG effect was HER2 receptor dependent because pretreatment of cells with the HER2 blocking antibody HCT blocked the HRG-dependent increase in G3BP phosphorylation. Thus, G3BP expression and phosphorylation are increased by HRG. We next sought to determine whether HRG altered G3BP activity.
|
HRG Rapidly Redistributes G3BP in Breast Cancer Cells.
The known functions of G3BP, including GAP binding, catalysis of RNA degradation, and helicase activity, are dependent on specific localization of G3BP within subcellular compartments. We next sought to determine the influence of HRG on the subcellular distribution of transfected T7-G3BP. SKBR3 cells were treated with HRG for various lengths of time, and T7-tagged G3BP was localized using immunofluorescence labeling and confocal microscopy. In serum-starved control cells, T7-G3BP protein was spread diffusely in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4A)
. This result is in agreement with previous reports on the normal subcellular distribution of G3BP (12)
. After 30 min of HRG treatment, G3BP moved to distinct vesicle-like structures in the cell cytoplasm and to distinct bands at the periphery of the cell (Fig. 4B)
. At this time point, T7-G3BP was colocalized with GAP within these distinct cytoplasmic locations (Fig. 4C)
, consistent with the previously reported cell fractionation studies (11)
. However, by 60 min, T7-G3BP had again relocalized within the cell, becoming once more diffusely spread in the cytoplasm with some perinuclear and cell membrane accumulation. Importantly, T7-G3BP was also localized to distinct nuclear regions, where it colocalized with acetylated histone H3, a marker of active transcription (Fig. 4D)
. This nuclear localization was selective because G3BP did not colocalize with acetylated histone H4 (data not shown). A nuclear localization and function for G3BP has been implicated previously (14)
, but the current report is the first to localize G3BP to specific functional regions of the nucleus after growth factor treatment. Pretreatment with HCT effectively blocked both the colocalization of G3BP with GAP (Fig. 4E)
and the nuclear movement of G3BP (Fig. 4F)
, demonstrating that these changes were HER2 dependent. This distinct temporal movement of T7-G3BP within the cell after HRG treatment could imply a rapid activation and/or initiation of cytoplasmic activity of G3BP, followed closely by translocation and function in specific nuclear domains. Both changes could facilitate G3BP promotion of S-phase entry and cell cycle progression after growth factor stimulation (13)
.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by NIH Grants CA80066 and CA65746 and Cancer Center Core Grant CA16672 (to R. K.). ![]()
2 C. J. B. and F. L. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: rkumar{at}mdanderson.org ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; HRG, heregulin; HCT, Herceptin; ER, estrogen receptor. ![]()
Received 10/10/01. Accepted 1/18/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression by growth factors and anti-receptor blocking antibodies. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 5636-5642, 2001.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Langenau, M. D. Keefe, N. Y. Storer, J. R. Guyon, J. L. Kutok, X. Le, W. Goessling, D. S. Neuberg, L. M. Kunkel, and L. I. Zon Effects of RAS on the genesis of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma Genes & Dev., June 1, 2007; 21(11): 1382 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Lin, J. Friederichs, M. A. Black, J. Mages, R. Rosenberg, P. J. Guilford, V. Phillips, M. Thompson-Fawcett, N. Kasabov, T. Toro, et al. Multiple Gene Expression Classifiers from Different Array Platforms Predict Poor Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 498 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wang, M. D. David, and J. W. Schrader Absence of Caprin-1 Results in Defects in Cellular Proliferation J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4274 - 4282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Barnes, F. Li, A. H. Talukder, and R. Kumar Growth Factor Regulation of a 26S Proteasomal Subunit in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2868 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rahmouni, T. Vang, A. Alonso, S. Williams, M. van Stipdonk, C. Soncini, M. Moutschen, S. P. Schoenberger, and T. Mustelin Removal of C-Terminal Src Kinase from the Immune Synapse by a New Binding Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2227 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang and A. W. Hamburger Heregulin Regulates the Ability of the ErbB3-binding Protein Ebp1 to Bind E2F Promoter Elements and Repress E2F-mediated Transcription J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26126 - 26133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, C. J. Barnes, and R. Kumar Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status Modulates Subcellular Localization of and Interaction with Estrogen Receptor {alpha} in Breast Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3621 - 3628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, R. Bagheri-Yarmand, S. Balasenthil, G. Hortobagyi, A. A. Sahin, C. J. Barnes, and R. Kumar HER2 Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) Expression and Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to PPAR{gamma} Ligand Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 3198 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Kouvaraki, G. Z. Rassidakis, L. Tian, R. Kumar, C. Kittas, and F.-X. Claret Jun Activation Domain-binding Protein 1 Expression in Breast Cancer Inversely Correlates with the Cell Cycle Inhibitor p27Kip1 Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2977 - 2981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Talukder, S. K. Mishra, M. Mandal, S. Balasenthil, S. Mehta, A. A. Sahin, C. J. Barnes, and R. Kumar MTA1 Interacts with MAT1, a Cyclin-dependent Kinase-activating Kinase Complex Ring Finger Factor, and Regulates Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Functions J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 11676 - 11685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |