| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Division of Human Gene Therapy, Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Surgery [G. J. B., J. T. L., A. K., K. S., D. M. N., I. D., V. K., R. D. A., D. T. C., A. H.] and Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology [M. N. B., R. D. A.], University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3300; VectorLogics, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama 35233 [V. K., G. V. M.]; Duesseldorf University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich-Heine University, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany [P. D.]; and Gene Therapy Unit, Institut Catala d’Oncologia, 08907 Barcelona, Spain [R. A.]
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top ABSTRACT IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
24RGD is an adenovirus that is selectively replication competent in cells defective in the Rb/p16 pathway, such as ovarian cancer cells. The fiber of Ad5-24RGD contains an integrin binding RGD-4C motif, allowing Coxsackie adenovirus receptor-independent infection of cancer cells. Oncolysis of cell lines was similar to that of a wild-type control, and replication in primary tumor material was shown using a novel three-dimensional spheroid model. Finally, an orthotopic murine model of peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer was used to test i.p. administration to tumor-bearing animals. Injection of the agent resulted in eradication of i.p. disease, whereas control animals expired (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that Ad5-24RGD could be useful for treatment of ovarian cancer in humans. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
24RGD), which has a 24-bp deletion in the CR2 of the E1A gene (7)
. This domain of the E1A protein is responsible for binding the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor/cell cycle regulator protein, Rb, which allows Ad to induce S-phase entry. Therefore, viruses with this type of deletion are reduced in their ability to overcome the G1-S checkpoint and replicate efficiently only in cells where this interaction is not necessary, e.g. in tumor cells defective in the Rb/p16 pathway (8
, 9)
. This pathway is inactive in almost all human tumors (10)
, including ovarian cancers (11
, 12)
. To circumvent the CAR deficiency of primary human ovarian cancers, the fiber of Ad5-24RGD was modified by incorporating an integrin binding RGD-4C motif into the HI loop. This infectivity enhancement has been shown to dramatically increase transduction of ovarian cancer cells (13)
. Because most ovarian cancer patients present with ascites, it is important to note that the RGD-4C modification allows partial escape from neutralizing antibodies regularly present in the ascites (13)
. |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
Viruses.
Ad5-24RGD (Fig. 1)
was created using a shuttle vector containing a 24-bp deletion in the CR2 region of E1A (7)
. The shuttle was cotransfected into Escherichia coli cells for homologous recombination with pVK503, an E3-containing rescue plasmid with the RGD-4C modification of the fiber. The virus was propagated on A549 cells. Ad5wtRGD was created by digesting pVK503 with PacI, followed by transfection into 293 cells, resulting in an otherwise wt Ad with the RGD-4C modification in the fiber. Ad5wtRGD and Ad5lucRGD (nonreplicating, luc-expressing, RGD-4C-modified virus) were propagated on 293 cells. All viruses were purified with double CsCl gradients using standard methods and titered with standard spectrophotometry and plaque assay. The presence of the E3 region and the RGD-4C modification was confirmed with PCR (primers: E3L2, 5'-CCTGAAACACCTGGTCCACT-3'; E3R2, 5'-GCCACAGTTAGGGCTTCTGA-3'; FiberUp, 5'-CAAACGCTGTTGGATTTATG-3'; and FiberDown, 5'-GTGTAAGAGGATGTGGCAAAT-3'). The presence of the 24-bp deletion in E1A and the absence of wt E1A were confirmed with PCR (primers: D24L1, 5'-GTCCGGTTTCTATGCCAAAC-3'; and D24R1, 5'-TCACCCTCTTCATCCTCGTC-3') followed by sequencing.
|
Quantitative PCR.
Ovarian adenocarcinoma primary cells were purified from malignant ascites samples as described previously (14)
. Analysis and creation of spheroids from primary ovarian carcinoma cells are detailed elsewhere (15)
. Briefly, purified unpassaged cells were incubated overnight in a 3% agar-coated flask on a rocker to form spheroids, i.e. three-dimensional clusters of cells. The spheroids were resuspended and infected with 1000 VP/cell Ad5-24RGD. The next day, the spheroids were divided into five equal aliquots of 1 x 105 cells, which were collected daily. DNA was extracted with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA), and quantitative PCR for the E1 gene was performed with Lightcycler methodology as described previously (13)
. To display the negative control, readings below the detection limit of the assay were set as 1, and other results are displayed relative to this control.
Therapeutic Ovarian Carcinoma Model.
CB17 SCID mice (n = 11 mice/group) were injected with 1 x 107 SKOV3.ip1 cells i.p. on day 0. On days 4, 5, and 6, mice were injected i.p. with 1 x 1010 or 5 x 108 VP of Ad5-24RGD, Ad5lucRGD (nonreplicative control), or no virus. The virus was diluted with Opti-MEM into 1 ml in each case. Mice were inspected daily, and euthanasia was performed in case of discomfort or distress. Survival data were plotted into a Kaplan-Meier curve, and, using the LIFETEST procedure in SAS v.8.2, the Ad5-24RGD group was compared with the other groups with the log-rank test. The distribution of the data best fit the Weibull model, which was used for individual comparisons between the Ad5-24RGD groups and controls, using the 
2 test of SAS v.8.2 LIFEREG procedure.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
24RGD Replicates in and Kills Ovarian Carcinoma Cells.24RGD and Ad5wtRGD, followed by oncolytic death of cells (Fig. 2A)
. In the adenocarcinoma lines (Hey, SKOV3.ip1, and Ov-4), the CRAD replicated to a similar degree as the virus containing the wt early genes (Ad5wtRGD). For PA-1, a teratocarcinoma line, the oncolytic effect of Ad5wtRGD was slightly stronger than that of Ad5-24RGD. Ad5lucRGD did not cause oncolysis. The crystal violet findings were confirmed with a quantitative assay based on protein concentration, which reflects the amount of cells left after replication and oncolysis (Fig. 2B)
. When Ad5-24RGD (10 VP/cell) was used for infection of Hey, SKOV3.ip1, PA-1, and OV-4 cells, 11.2% (P < 0.0001), 46.2% (P < 0.0001), 73.0% (P = 0.0908), and 46.7% (P = 0.0028) of cells remained alive (as compared with uninfected wells). For Ad5wtRGD, the positive control, the results were similar [13.7% (P < 0.0001), 22.7% (P < 0.0001), 28.0% (P = 0.0325), and 51.9% (P = 0.0295)]. Therefore, Ad5-24RGD has similar oncolytic potential to an E1 wt virus.
|
24RGD in Ovarian Cancer Primary Cell Spheroids.
. One day after infection, 1.13 copies/well were detected, and the number grew exponentially to 1,036, 19,336, 402,000, and 4,296,000 copies on days 2, 3, 4, and 5. Thus, Ad5-24RGD infects and replicates in primary unpassaged ovarian cancer cells.
|
24RGD in an i.p. Model of Ovarian Cancer.
. Median survival was 64, 45, and 36 days, respectively, and the mean survival times for Ad5lucRGD and no virus were 45.7 and 37.6 days, respectively. Statistical analysis with the log-rank and 2 tests indicated that survival was significantly better in animals treated with Ad5-24RGD (P < 0.0001). A smaller dose of the viruses (5 x 108 VP/day) was also investigated (Fig. 4b)
. The median survival was not reached for Ad5-24RGD. For Ad5lucRGD and no virus, the median survival was 40 and 36 days, and the means were 41.9 and 37.6 days, respectively. All mice in the control groups expired before day 60. All mice treated with 5 x 108 VP of Ad5-24RGD survived until at least day 61. The log-rank and 2 tests confirmed that survival was significantly better in animals treated with Ad5-24RGD (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, none of the mice treated with Ad5-24RGD showed evidence of i.p. disease after treatment. Instead, many developed s.c. tumors at the site where tumor cell injection had been performed, which eventually necessitated sacrifice of the animals. All animals in the control groups expired or were sacrificed due to i.p. tumor growth.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
vß group of integrins and allows dramatically increased transduction of primary ovarian cancer cells (13)
. All ovarian cancer gene therapy trials published thus far have relied on i.p. inoculation of the agent. This is due to the fact that the disease usually presents at an advanced stage, typically with peritoneal metastasis, which has the worst prognosis. The i.p. administration and readministration can be conveniently achieved with a catheter, and the peritoneal cavity allows a degree of compartmentalization, which may have contributed to the excellent safety profile observed in Phase I studies (5) . The peritoneal cavity could also allow effective dissemination of a CRAD, resulting in good transduction of i.p. tumor masses. However, these patients usually have malignant ascites, which contain anti-Ad neutralizing antibodies. It is important to note that the RGD-4C modification of the fiber allows Ad to partially escape preexisting anti-Ad antibodies, which could improve transduction of tumor tissue (13) .
The replicative selectivity of Ad5-24RGD (Fig. 1)
is based on incapability of binding Rb, and therefore replication is expected to occur preferentially in cells where S-phase induction is not required, such as cells defective in the Rb/p16 pathway. This pathway may be faulty in all human cancers (10)
, including ovarian adenocarcinomas (11
, 12)
. Previously, it has been shown that replication of CR2-deleted viruses is attenuated in nonproliferating normal cells (8
, 9)
. Interestingly, abrogation of replication was also demonstrated when Rb was reintroduced into otherwise permissive cells (8)
.
In this study, we show replication of Ad5-24RGD in ovarian cancer cell lines (Fig. 2)
. The assays used here measure both replication and subsequent oncolysis because the readout corresponds with the remaining amount of live cells. The variable numbers of live cells at termination of the assays reflect the opposite effects of viral oncolysis on one hand and cell replication on the other. In vivo, cell turnover is likely to be slower, and viral dispersion dynamics are likely to be different due to the three-dimensional nature of solid tumors. Therefore, it is difficult to draw definite conclusions from the differences seen in the antitumor effect between the cell lines. Instead, the main finding is that replication and oncolysis were seen in each cell line. Impressively, the potency of Ad5-24RGD was very similar to that of Ad5wtRGD, which is wt except for the fiber modification. This virus was chosen as the positive control to avoid bias due to differences in infectivity (and subsequent oncolytic potency) caused by nonidentical fibers. These findings are in accord with those of other investigators who have studied the effect of the CR2 deletion on replicativity and oncolytic potency (9)
. In cancer cell lines, a CR2-deleted virus demonstrated similar superior replicativity when compared with wt Ad (9)
. Also, the CR2-deleted virus was compared with the E1B55K-deleted dl1520 virus, which has been used extensively for treatment of patients. Although there are some promising results in combination with chemotherapy (6)
, the evidence showing replication of dl1520 in tumor tissue has been anecdotal, and the single agent clinical efficacy has been marginal, possibly due to the low replicativity of the agent. In contrast, the CR2 deletion does not seem to affect replicativity to a significant degree, and it will be interesting to see if this leads to higher therapeutic efficacy.
Previous studies with Ads have suggested that there is a disconnect between transduction efficacy in preclinical versus human studies. An important reason for this may be the highly variable expression of CAR in primary tissue. Therefore, unpassaged and purified primary tumor material has been used as the most stringent template for testing novel approaches. A problem with primary cells is that they tend not to stay alive very long in vitro, and thus analysis of replication and oncolysis is difficult. We have developed an ovarian primary cell spheroid model that allows purified cancer cells to stay alive for at least a month (15)
. Also, the three-dimensional structure of spheroids may resemble in vivo tumors better than two-dimensional cell line cultures. Here, we tested the replication of Ad5-24RGD on spheroids and observed an exponential increase in VP as a function of time (Fig. 3)
. This suggests that Ad5-24RGD can infect and replicate in primary ovarian cancer cells.
The ultimate preclinical test of an experimental therapeutic is an orthotopic animal model. Here, we used a murine model of peritoneally metastatic ovarian cancer, and we performed i.p. injections of the virus, as would be offered in a human trial (Fig. 4)
. Mice treated with Ad5-24RGD displayed healing of i.p. disease. However, some mice relapsed with s.c. tumors. This could have been caused by a small number of tumor cells contaminating the needle tract during the injection of cells. The virus probably had little access to the s.c. tissue and therefore could not eradicate these cells. It should be noted that no cures or long-term survival has previously been reported for this aggressive model of ovarian cancer.
With the lowest viral dose used, we saw 100% survival for up to 61 days, when all animals in the control groups had expired (Fig. 4)
. The only other CRAD that has been used for treatment of an ovarian cancer animal model is dl1520 (16)
. Two days after i.p. inoculation of A2780 tumors, 1 x 109 plaque-forming units (2 x 1010 VP) were injected daily for 5 days, resulting in 40% of mice showing no evidence of i.p. disease. Five doses of 4 x 108 VP of dl1520 i.p. into mice bearing OvCAR3 tumor resulted in resolving of i.p. tumors in four of four cases, but the follow-up period was only 42 days. Although direct comparison is difficult due to different experimental design, the in vivo efficacy of Ad5-24RGD could compare favorably with that of dl1520.
The dose used here was 5 x 108 VP daily for 3 days, which would equal approximately 1 x 1012 VP for a 60-kg human (w/w). dl1520 has been administered to humans i.p. with doses ranging from a daily dose of 1 x 1011 to 1 x 1013 VP for 5 consecutive days (17)
. Although the final data are currently unavailable, the preliminary results suggest that patients with bulky tumors (>2 cm) experienced dose-limiting side effects at 1 x 1012 VP x 5, whereas patients with nonbulky tumors tolerated 1 x 1013 VP x 5 without toxicity. Although comparisons between mouse and human data should be avoided because human Ads do not replicate in murine tissues to any significant degree, these figures suggest that the oncolytic potency of Ad5-24RGD is sufficient to merit a human trial.
Recently, it has been demonstrated that gene therapy is a feasible way of achieving clinical benefits in patients (18, 19, 20) . Interestingly, these findings have come from the seemingly unrelated fields of genetic disease on one hand and acquired vascular diseases on the other. What these success stories have in common is the rational approach investigators have had in developing the gene delivery tools. Thus, the clinical breakthroughs were based on advances in vector development. The approach described in this study combines two promising fields, replication-competent viruses and infectivity enhancement. Together, these powerful means to increase tumor transduction could help achieve similar breakthroughs in the field of cancer gene therapy.
In conclusion, we have used a novel replication-competent agent, Ad5-24RGD, for treatment of ovarian cancer models. The infectivity of the virus has been enhanced for CAR-independent infection of tumor cells. We observed replication and oncolytic potency similar to those of a wt control virus (both viruses were fiber modified). Using a highly novel three-dimensional spheroid model, we detected an exponential increase in the amount of Ad5-24RGD gene copies, suggesting efficient replication. Finally, we used a stringent orthotopic murine model of peritoneally metastatic ovarian cancer and saw significant improvement in survival of the animals. In fact, all animals displayed complete eradication of i.p. disease. These results suggest that Ad5-24RGD could be an effective agent for treatment of ovarian cancer and that the toxicity should be evaluated in a Phase I trial. Also, considering that Rb/p16 pathway abnormalities in tumors seem to be ubiquitous (10)
, the agent could prove useful for other types of tumors as well.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants BA2076/1-1 (to G. J. B.) and NE832/1 (to D. M. N.), the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Cancer Research Fund, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Maud Kuistila Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, United States Army Department of Defense Grant PC991018, The Lustgarten Foundation Grant LF043, NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Grant P50 CA83591, and NIH Grant R01 CA83821. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Human Gene Therapy, Gene Therapy Center, WTI #602, 1824 6th Avenue S., University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300. Phone: (205) 975-2896; Fax: (205) 975-8565; E-mail: akseli{at}uab.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: CRAD, conditionally replicating adenovirus; Ad, adenovirus; CAR, Coxsackie adenovirus receptor; luc, luciferase; VP, viral particle(s); wt, wild-type; CR2, constant region 2.
Received 11/ 5/01. Accepted 1/16/02.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. J. Bauerschmitz, T. Ranki, L. Kangasniemi, C. Ribacka, M. Eriksson, M. Porten, I. Herrmann, A. Ristimaki, P. Virkkunen, M. Tarkkanen, et al. Tissue-Specific Promoters Active in CD44+CD24-/low Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5533 - 5539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Monfared, A. Winkeler, M. Klein, H. Li, A. Klose, M. Hoesel, Y. Waerzeggers, S. Korsching, and A. H. Jacobs Noninvasive Assessment of E2F-1-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation In vivo Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5932 - 5940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L.M. Lamfers, S. Idema, L. Bosscher, S. Heukelom, S. Moeniralm, I. H. van der Meulen-Muileman, R. M. Overmeer, P. van der Valk, V. W. van Beusechem, W. R. Gerritsen, et al. Differential Effects of Combined Ad5-{Delta}24RGD and Radiation Therapy in In vitro versus In vivo Models of Malignant Glioma Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7451 - 7458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Guse, T. Ranki, M. Ala-Opas, P. Bono, M. Sarkioja, M. Rajecki, A. Kanerva, T. Hakkarainen, and A. Hemminki Treatment of metastatic renal cancer with capsid-modified oncolytic adenoviruses Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2007; 6(10): 2728 - 2736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Y. Logunov, O. V. Zubkova, A. S. Karyagina-Zhulina, E. A. Shuvalova, A. P. Karpov, M. M. Shmarov, I. L. Tutykhina, Y. S. Alyapkina, N. M. Grezina, N. A. Zinovieva, et al. Identification of HI-Like Loop in CELO Adenovirus Fiber for Incorporation of Receptor Binding Motifs J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 9641 - 9652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wakayama, M. Abei, R. Kawashima, E. Seo, K. Fukuda, H. Ugai, T. Murata, N. Tanaka, I. Hyodo, H. Hamada, et al. E1A, E1B Double-Restricted Adenovirus with RGD-Fiber Modification Exhibits Enhanced Oncolysis for CAR-Deficient Biliary Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 3043 - 3050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Kangasniemi, T. Kiviluoto, A. Kanerva, M. Raki, T. Ranki, M. Sarkioja, H. Wu, F. Marini, K. Hockerstedt, H. Isoniemi, et al. Infectivity-Enhanced Adenoviruses Deliver Efficacy in Clinical Samples and Orthotopic Models of Disseminated Gastric Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 12(10): 3137 - 3144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Komarova, Y. Kawakami, M. A. Stoff-Khalili, D. T. Curiel, and L. Pereboeva Mesenchymal progenitor cells as cellular vehicles for delivery of oncolytic adenoviruses. Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 755 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lockley, M. Fernandez, Y. Wang, N. F. Li, S. Conroy, N. Lemoine, and I. McNeish Activity of the Adenoviral E1A Deletion Mutant dl922-947 in Ovarian Cancer: Comparison with E1A Wild-type Viruses, Bioluminescence Monitoring, and Intraperitoneal Delivery in Icodextrin Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 989 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. T. Rein, M. Breidenbach, T. O. Kirby, T. Han, G. P. Siegal, G. J. Bauerschmitz, M. Wang, D. M. Nettelbeck, Y. Tsuruta, M. Yamamoto, et al. A Fiber-Modified, Secretory Leukoprotease Inhibitor Promoter-Based Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1327 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Wang, S. Thorne, J. Hannock, J. Francis, T. Au, T. Reid, N. Lemoine, D. Kirn, and G. Hallden A Novel Assay to Assess Primary Human Cancer Infectibility by Replication-Selective Oncolytic Adenoviruses Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 351 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. O. Kirby, A. Rivera, D. Rein, M. Wang, I. Ulasov, M. Breidenbach, M. Kataram, J. L. Contreras, C. Krumdieck, M. Yamamoto, et al. A Novel Ex vivo Model System for Evaluation of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses Therapeutic Efficacy and Toxicity Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8697 - 8703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. I. Abou El Hassan, I. van der Meulen-Muileman, S. Abbas, and F. A. E. Kruyt Conditionally Replicating Adenoviruses Kill Tumor Cells via a Basic Apoptotic Machinery-Independent Mechanism That Resembles Necrosis-Like Programmed Cell Death J. Virol., November 15, 2004; 78(22): 12243 - 12251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 1 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Jakubczak, P. Ryan, M. Gorziglia, L. Clarke, L. K. Hawkins, C. Hay, Y. Huang, M. Kaloss, A. Marinov, S. Phipps, et al. An Oncolytic Adenovirus Selective for Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein Pathway-defective Tumors: Dependence on E1A, the E2F-1 Promoter, and Viral Replication for Selectivity and Efficacy Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 63(7): 1490 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. M. Lamfers, J. Grill, C. M. F. Dirven, V. W. van Beusechem, B. Geoerger, J. van den Berg, R. Alemany, J. Fueyo, D. T. Curiel, G. Vassal, et al. Potential of the Conditionally Replicative Adenovirus Ad5-{Delta}24RGD in the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas and Its Enhanced Effect with Radiotherapy Cancer Res., October 15, 2002; 62(20): 5736 - 5742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Russell Adenovirus Gene Therapy for Ovarian Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, May 15, 2002; 94(10): 706 - 707. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
