Cancer Research Targets  Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaturvedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, B.-B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaturvedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, B.-B. S.
[Cancer Research 62, 1797-1801, March 15, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Chfr Regulates a Mitotic Stress Pathway through its RING-Finger Domain with Ubiquitin Ligase Activity1

Priya Chaturvedi, Valery Sudakin, Matthew L. Bobiak, Paul W. Fisher, Michael R. Mattern, Sandra A. Jablonski, Mark R. Hurle, Yuan Zhu, Tim J. Yen and Bin-Bing S. Zhou2

Departments of Oncology Research [P. C., M. L. B., P. W. F., M. R. M., B-B. S. Z.], Bioinformatics [M. R. H.], and Molecular Biology [Y. Z.], GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, and Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [V. S., S. A. J., T. J. Y.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Resistance to chemotherapy targeting microtubules could be partially because of the delay in chromosome condensation and segregation during mitosis. The Chfr pathway has been defined recently, and its activation causes a delay in chromosome condensation in response to mitotic stress. Because Chfr contains a RING-finger domain, we tested whether Chfr inhibits chromosome condensation through an ubiquitin (ubiquitin)-dependent pathway. In the presence of purified E1, Ubc4, or Ubc5, and ubiquitin, Chfr catalyzes its own ubiquitination in vitro, an activity requiring the RING domain. In vivo, overexpressed Chfr but not a RING domain mutant is spontaneously ubiquitinated. Our studies with DLD1 cells stably expressing wild-type Chfr and Chfr lacking the RING domain indicated that the RING-finger deletion mutant was defective in inhibiting chromosome condensation after Taxol treatment. In addition, Chfr expression increases the survival rate after Taxol treatment, an activity requiring the RING domain. Preliminary studies indicate that Chfr expression is cell cycle regulated and is dependent on its ubiquitin ligase activity. It is very likely that the Chfr-mediated ubiquitin-dependent pathway is a critical component of the response to mitotic stress.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The segregation of chromosomes at mitosis involves a series of steps, including condensation of chromosomes and separation of the centrosomes in prophase, chromosomal alignment on the spindle in metaphase, and sister-chromatid separation in anaphase (1, 2, 3, 4) . The surveillance mechanisms activated at various stages of mitosis monitor the fidelity of these processes. Two mitotic checkpoints responding to mitotic stress have been reported. One, the spindle-assembly checkpoint, ensures that each pair of chromosomes is correctly attached to a bipolar spindle before anaphase (5) . A second checkpoint, identified in yeast, depends on the BIM1/EB1 gene (6) ; this checkpoint delays the exit from mitosis when the spindle is oriented abnormally. An additional stress response pathway, involving Chfr, has been defined recently in mammals. Chfr activation causes a delay in chromosome condensation in response to mitotic stress, and its expression increased the cellular ability to survive the stress (7) .

How does Chfr delay cell entry into mitosis? Initiation of early mitotic events, including nuclear membrane breakdown and chromosome condensation, requires the activation of mitotic kinases such as cyclin B/cdc2 (8) . Because cyclin B/cdc2 activity remains high during the Chfr-dependent delay, its activity might not be the target of the Chfr-dependent pathway (7) . Alternatively, Chfr may be involved in controlling cyclin B/cdc2 substrates that regulate chromosome condensation and nuclear membrane breakdown. Chfr contains a FHA3 domain, which could bind phosphorylated peptides (9 , 10) ; thus, protein kinases might act upstream of Chfr and regulate its activity. Chfr also contains a RING-finger domain, which is found in several ubiquitin ligases (11) . In addition to ubiquitin ligase (E3), protein ubiquitination also involves the action of a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) and a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2; Ref. 12 ). The spindle assembly checkpoint is associated with a ubiquitin-dependent pathway and is regulated by the ubiquitin ligase activity of the APC/C (13) . Recently, a subunit of APC/C, which contains a RING-finger domain, APC11, was shown to be the ubiquitin ligase in the APC/C (14 , 15) . Because Chfr has a RING-finger domain, it was of interest to see whether it had a role to play in the ubiquitination process as an E3 and whether this activity of Chfr mediates its function in the mitotic stress response.

We report here that Chfr has ubiquitin ligase activity, which may be required for its role in delaying chromosome condensation in cells stressed by tubulin poisons such as Taxol. Chfr expression increases cellular survival after Taxol treatment, consistent with a role for Chfr in surviving mitotic stress.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Constructs, Recombinant Protein Expression, and Purification.
The full-length chfr cDNA were subcloned into baculoviral expression vector, pAcG2T. The deletion of the RING-finger domain of chfr (Chfr{Delta}R) was created by a restriction digestion approach. The pACcG2T vector containing full-length chfr was digested with BamHI and EcoRI to delete the following amino acids constituting the RING domain: CIICQDLLHDCVSLQPCMHTFCAACYSGWMERSSLCPTCRCPVE. The RING-fingerless domain fragment was then religated in frame. Both Chfr and Chfr{Delta}R were also subcloned into mammalian expression vector pWSgfp (16) for transfection experiments.

Chfr or Chfr{Delta}R construct in pACcG2T vector was transfected into Sf-9 cells, and the virus from the transfection was harvested for amplification. The high titer viral stocks were additionally optimized for expression and scaleup. The harvested cells were lysed, and the protein was purified by sequential chromatography steps including glutathione Sepharose and Superdex G75 columns at 4°C.

Cell Lines.
Human SW480 was cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS, human SAOS2 was maintained in McCoys 5A medium containing 15% FBS, HeLa, and DLD1 cell lines were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS (complete medium). For creating stable cell lines, DLD1 cells were transfected with pWSgfp-Chfr or pWSgfp-Chfr{Delta}R using the LipofectAMINE method (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Clones were selected in G418 and confirmed both by expression of the GFP-Chfr protein using a fluorescent microscope and by Western blotting with anti-GFP and anti-Chfr antibody. The stable cell lines including DLD1/Chfr and DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R were maintained in complete medium containing 400 µg/ml of G418. For synchronization, the cells were treated with 2 mM thymidine for 18 h, released for 6 h, then treated with 5 µg/ml of aphidicolin for 20 h. To induce mitotic stress, cells were treated with 300 nM Taxol for 18–20 h.

Antibodies.
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Chfr were generated against a NH2-terminal peptide of human Chfr: MERPEEGKQSPPPQPWGRLLRC-COOH and affinity purified. Antibodies against GFP and HA tag were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).

Western Blotting and Immunoprecipitation.
Nuclear lysates were prepared using an extraction kit from Pierce (Rockford, IL). The protein in the lysates was estimated and an equal amount of protein (150 µg) was immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibody at 4°C for 2 h followed by incubation with protein A-Sepharose for 1 h at 4°C. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The gel was then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was first blocked in 3% milk followed by addition of primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature in milk and the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (NEN, Boston, MA).

Mitotic Index.
Overnight, 2 x 104 cells/well in 24-well plates were grown in 37°C, 5% CO2. Taxol (300 nM) dissolved in culture medium was applied to cells, and cells were incubated for 20 h. Medium was aspirated, and cells were washed and fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 5 min. Permeabilization was accomplished using 5% Triton X-100 for 5 min. DNA was stained with 100 ng/ml Hoechst dye for 5 min after which the cells were washed and fresh PBS applied. Condensed chromosome and total cell counts were done manually using a fluorescent microscope. Mitotic index was calculated based on the percentage of cells with condensed chromosomes.

In Vitro Ubiquitination Assay.
Ubiquitin ligase activity was determined as described previously (17) . Reaction mixture contained the following in a volume of 10 µl: 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM phospho-creatine, 50 mg/ml creatine phosphokinase, 50 mM ubiquitin, 1 mM ubiquitin aldehyde, 1 pmol of E1, and 1.4 mg/ml wild-type Chfr or the Chfr mutants. The E2 enzymes were then added. After incubation at 30°C for 30 min, samples were subjected to electrophoresis on a 7.5% polyacrylamide-SDS gel. After transfer the membrane was probed with anti-Chfr and anti-ubiquitin antibodies. Purified recombinant UbcH5 was purchased from BostonBiochem (Boston, MA); purified recombinant UbcH4 was a generous gift of Dr. Hongtao Yu.

In Vivo Ubiquitination Assay.
HeLa cells (2 x 106) in Petri dishes were transiently cotransfected with 10 µg GFP-tagged Chfr or Chfr{Delta}R and HA-tagged ubiquitin constructs. HA-tagged ubiquitin construct was a generous gift of Dr. Dale Haines. Total cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody and immunoblotted with anti-Chfr antibody.

Transient Transfection for Immunofluorescence.
Dishes of DLD-1 cells (35 mm) containing coverslips were transfected with 2 µg of pWSgfp-Chfr or pWSgfp-Chfr{Delta}R using Fugene6 according to manufacturer’s directions (Roche Molecular, Indianapolis, IN). Coverslips were harvested for staining 20–24 h after transfection. Cells were first fixed in 3.5% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde for 7 min and then solubilized in KB + 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min, followed by a 5-min rinse in KB buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% BSA]. Cells were incubated with CENP-F antibody for 30 min at 37°C in a humidified chamber, rinsed in KB, followed by incubation with Alexa-Fluor 594 goat antirabbit IgG (2 µg/ml; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 min at 37°C in a humidified chamber. Cells were subsequently incubated with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (Molecular Probes; 0.25 µg/ml) for 15 min at room temperature, and mounted onto slides. Coverslips were scanned using a Nikon Microphot.

XTT Assay.
Inhibition of growth of various cell lines by Taxol in a 72-h incubation was assayed by a standard XTT protocol (18) . Viability was calculated from the ratio of the absorbance at 450 nm for the test sample divided by the absorbance at 450 nm for the standard (untreated control) sample, measured on a microplate reader (Dynatech, Lorton, VA). Triplicate determinations were performed, with standard deviation less than 15%.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of a Gene Containing Both FHA and RING-Finger Domain.
In an effort to find a novel gene containing the FHA domain, we searched the expressed sequence tag database for cDNAs with FHA motifs. Two overlapping expressed sequence tags, AA223499 and AA223601, were found, sequenced, and shown to encode a 664 amino acid protein with COOH-terminal FHA and RING-finger domain within its amino terminus. We initially named the gene FHAR1 (FHA-RING protein 1); during the course of this work, the same gene was published as Chfr (checkpoint containing FHA and RING-finger domain) by Scolnick and Halazonetis (7) , and the latter nomenclature is used in the present work.

Chfr Is a Ubiquitin Ligase Dependent on Its RING-Finger Domain.
The spindle assembly checkpoint involves a ubiquitindependent pathway, but it is unclear whether the Chfr-dependent mitotic stress response is mediated by ubiquitination. Chfr contains a RING finger at its COOH terminus. As demonstrated previously (reviewed in Ref. 11 ), most RING finger-containing proteins have the potential for ubiquitin protein ligase activity, so we examined whether Chfr has intrinsic ubiquitin protein ligase activity dependent on its RING-finger domain. For these experiments, GST fusion proteins with full-length Chfr and RING-finger domain deletion mutant (Chfr{Delta}R) were expressed and purified from baculovirus. GST-Chfr and GST-Chfr{Delta}R were assayed for self-ubiquitination in the presence of purified recombinant E1, E2, and ubiquitin. Four different human E2 subfamily members, Ubc10, Ubc2, Ubc4, and Ubc5, were tested in the assay. As a control, a blank reaction without Chfr was included. As shown in Fig. 1ACitation , in the presence of two different E2s namely Ubc4 or Ubc5, high molecular Chfr conjugates were formed (Fig. 1ACitation , Lane 4 and 5). On the other hand, no Chfr conjugates were found with two other E2s, Ubc10 and Ubc2, or in the control reaction (Fig. 1ACitation , Lane 1–3). To confirm that the Chfr conjugates are polyubiquitinated, the same reaction mixtures were probed with antiubiquitin antibody (Fig. 1B)Citation . These results show that Chfr is a ubiquitin ligase capable of catalyzing its own ubiquitination, and it prefers the Ubc4/5 family as its E2. In addition, because no conjugates were formed in the reactions where Chfr{Delta}R was used (Fig. 1, ACitation and B, Lanes 6–10), Chfr requires an intact RING-finger domain for its ubiquitin ligase activity.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Chfr has ubiquitin ligase activity dependent on its RING-finger domain. The ubiquitination reaction was performed in vitro using purified E1, various E2: Ubc10 (Lanes 2 and 7), Ubc2 (Lanes 3 and 8), Ubc4 (Lanes 4 and 9), or Ubc5 (Lanes 5 and 10) and Chfr (Lanes 1-5), or Chrf{Delta}R (Lanes 6-10) and ubiquitin at 30°C for 30 min, analyzed on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-Chfr antibody (A) or with anti-ubiquitin antibody (B).

 
In Vivo Ubiquitination Activity of Chfr.
To validate our findings regarding ubiquitination and Chfr, the ability of Chfr to catalyze its own ubiquitination in vivo was evaluated using HeLa cells transiently cotransfected with a HA-ubiquitin and a GFP-tagged Chfr (pSWgfp-Chfr) or Chfr{Delta}R (pSWgfp-Chfr{Delta}R) construct. Negative controls were the GFP vector (pSWgfp) with ubiquitin construct, GFP-Chfr, or GFP-Chfr{Delta}R alone. Lysates from transfected cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody and blotted with anti-Chfr antibody. GFP-Chfr was conjugated with the HA-ubiquitin to produce a ladder of ubiquitinated products (Fig. 2Citation , Lane 4). No conjugates were detected when HA-ubiquitin was omitted from the transfection (Fig. 2Citation , Lane 3). In lysates prepared from GFP-Chfr{Delta}R and HA-ubiquitin cotransfections, no significant high molecular weight laddering was seen (Fig. 2Citation , Lane 2). Lysates from GFP-Chfr and GFP-Chfr{Delta}R transfections without HA-ubiquitin or the HA-ubiquitin transfection alone did not show any dark staining of ubiquitinated products (Fig. 2Citation , Lanes 1, 3, and 5). These results suggest that Chfr exhibits RING domain-dependent auto-ubiquitination activity in vivo.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. In vivo ubiquitination activity of Chfr. HeLa cells were transiently cotransfected with 10 µg of GFP-tagged Chfr (Lane 4) or Chf{Delta}R (Lane 2) DNA construct and 1 µg of HA-ubiquitin construct. As negative controls, Chfr{Delta}R construct alone (Lane 1), Chfr construct alone (Lane 3), and HA-ubiquitin with the GFP vector alone (Lane 5) were transfected into HeLa cells. Total cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody, analyzed on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and Western blotted with anti-Chfr antibody.

 
RING-Finger Domain Is Essential for the Mitotic Stress Response Function of Chfr.
To determine the importance of the ubiquitin ligase activity of Chfr in prolonging a G2 delay on mitotic stress, the mitotic index (chromosome condensation) was measured in various cells treated with Taxol. For this experiment, three types of cells were used: (a) those that express wild-type Chfr, including colon carcinoma cell line SW480 and osteosarcoma cell line SAOS-2 (7) ; (b) those that are deficient in Chfr including a colon carcinoma cell line, DLD1; and (c) a stably transfected clone of DLD1 expressing Chfr tagged with GFP (DLD1/Chfr), RING-finger deletion mutant of Chfr tagged with GFP (DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R), or vector alone (DLD1/Vector). The cells were treated with 300 nM Taxol for 20 h, fixed in paraformaldehyde, permeabilized, stained with Hoechst dye, and observed microscopically. The cells that looked clearly rounded (mitotic) also had condensed chromosomes, whereas the cells that were attached firmly had diffused nuclei. After Taxol treatment, various cells showed increased mitotic indices as a result of spindle checkpoint arrest at metaphase. As expected, DLD1 cells with vector alone had high mitotic index (52%) after Taxol treatment, whereas DLD1 expressing wild-type Chfr, SW480, and SAOS-2 cells have somewhat lower mitotic indices (Fig. 3)Citation consistent with a cell cycle delay or arrest before mitosis. On the other hand, DLD1 cells stably expressing Chfr{Delta}R had a high mitotic index similar to the parental chfr-deficient DLD1 cells (Fig. 3)Citation . These results indicate that in the presence of Chfr the stressed cells are delayed in mitotic progression and that the RING-finger domain is required for this function.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Chfr-dependent mitotic delay requires its RING-finger domain. DLD1 cells alone or those expressing Chfr (DLD1/Chfr), the RING finger-deletion mutant (DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R), SW480, and SAOS2 were treated with 300 nM Taxol for 20 h. The cells were then fixed and DNA stained with Hoechst dye, and observed under the microscope. The mitotic index before ({square}) and after Taxol treatment () were calculated based on the percentage of cells with condensed chromosomes.

 
Chfr Is Critical for Cell Survival in the Presence of Mitotic Stress but not for Topotecan-induced DNA Damage Response.
To study the functional consequences of the Chfr-dependent pathway, we examined the effect of Chfr on cell growth in the presence of Taxol, comparing Chfr-proficient cells including DLD1/Chfr, SW480, and Chfr-deficient cells including DLD1 and DLD1/vector cells. In addition, DLD1 cells expressing RING domain-deleted Chfr (DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R) were included in the experiments to determine the role of the RING-finger domain in this mitotic stress response function of Chfr. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Taxol, and their viabilities were assayed at 72 h. As shown in Fig. 4ACitation , our results indicate that at as low as 10 nM Taxol, the DLD1/Chfr and SW480 cells were >60% viable compared with the cells expressing the RING-finger deletion mutant (Chfr{Delta}R) or the vector alone (DLD1/vector), or the DLD1 cells, which were at about 20–30% viability (Fig. 4A)Citation . Three different DLD1/Chfr clones gave very similar results (data not shown). These findings confirm that the sensitivity of DLD1 cells to Taxol is correlated with their defects in Chfr-dependent mitotic delay, an activity also requiring RING domain. Also to confirm that Chfr has a role to play specifically in response to mitotic stress, we repeated the same XTT experiment with cells treated with increasing concentrations of Topotecan, an anticancer drug that transforms topoisomerase I-DNA-transient intermediates into lethal DNA lesions and has been suggested to activate a DNA-damage checkpoint (19, 20, 21) . The presence or absence of Chfr made no difference to the response of cells to DNA damage, indicating that Chfr has a role limited to mitotic stress response pathway (Fig. 4B)Citation .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Role of Chfr in cell survival in the presence of mitotic stress or DNA damage. DLD1 cells and those expressing either wild type (DLD1/Chfr), the RING finger-deletion mutant (DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R), GFP vector alone (DLD1/vector), and SW480 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of either Taxol (A) or topotecan (B), and their viabilities were assessed after 72 h by XTT assay as described in "Materials and Methods." One of three independent experiments is shown in each case; results were qualitatively similar in all experiments.

 
Cell Cycle-dependent Chfr Expression.
To study cell cycle- dependent Chfr expression, DLD1/Chfr and DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R cells were synchronized at the G1-S boundary by a double block with thymidine and aphidicolin, and released for various times. As indicated in Fig. 5BCitation , FACS analysis was performed to ascertain the phase of the cell cycle at various times. Because Chfr is a nuclear protein and the antibody used only recognizes Chfr specifically in the nuclear fraction, nuclear extracts were used to study protein expression. The Western blot results indicate that cells in G1 express low levels of Chfr (Fig. 5ACitation , Lanes 2 and 3) as compared with asynchronous cells (Fig. 5ACitation , Lane 1) and that the protein levels are markedly increased during late S phase (Fig. 5ACitation , Lanes 4-6). Because Chfr is believed to function in prophase, this expression pattern is consistent with its role in the mitotic stress response. Because Chfr has autoubiquitin ligase activity, we tested whether the RING-finger domain had any role to play in this cell cycle-dependent expression pattern and whether ubiquitin ligase activity was required for this process. The same experiment was repeated with DLD1 cells stably expressing Chfr{Delta}R cells; in the absence of the RING-finger domain, Chfr expression remained unchanged throughout the cell cycle (Fig. 5C)Citation . Consistent with the observation that the Chfr level is low in G1 and high before mitosis in DLD1 cells stably expressing Chfr, thymidine-treated SW480 cells with endogenous wild-type Chfr have a lower Chfr level, whereas Taxol-treated cells have a higher Chfr level in comparison with that of untreated controls (data not shown).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Chfr is expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner. A, DLD1/Chfr cells were synchronized at the G1-S boundary by a double block with thymidine and aphidicolin (Lane 2) and released for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 h (Lanes 3–7). Asynchronous cells were included as control (Lane 1). Nuclear extracts were prepared, resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-Chfr antibody. B, cell cycle stage for each sample depicted in A was determined by FACS analysis. G1, {blacksquare}; S, ; G2-M, {square}. C, Western blot with anti-Chfr was performed on nuclear lysates prepared from DLD1/Chfr{Delta}R cells synchronized as described in A. D, cell cycle stage for each sample depicted in C was determined by FACS analysis. G1, {blacksquare}; S, ; G2-M, {square}. E, DLD1 cells were transiently transfected with GFP-Chfr or GFP-Chfr{Delta}R construct and counterstained with anti CENP-F antibody. No mitotic cells were observed among GFP-Chfr transfected cells, whereas several mitotic cells were observed among GFP-Chfr{Delta}R-transfected cells.

 
To validate the results obtained with Western blotting, cell cycle-dependent expression of Chfr was also measured by fluorescence imaging. Because the Chfr antibody is not suitable for immunostaining, DLD1 cells were transiently transfected with a GFP-tagged construct of Chfr. Transfected cells on coverslips were counterstained with anti-CENP-F antibody, which was used as a G2-M marker (22) . Consistent with the finding of optimal Chfr expression in S phase, the fluorescence imaging showed that protein levels were negligible in mitotic cells expressing GFP-Chfr (Fig. 5E)Citation . Examination of cells transfected with the GFP-Chfr{Delta}R showed that it was expressed in mitotic cells and G1 or S cells that were also CENP-F negative (Fig. 5E)Citation . Thus, the loss of GFP-Chfr in mitotic cells correlates with the Western blot expression pattern. This loss is likely dependent on ubiquitination activity, because the RING domain mutant is stable in mitosis and G1 phase.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chfr has been characterized in the present work as a ubiquitin ligase capable of catalyzing its own ubiquitination and dependent on an intact RING-finger domain for activity. The expression of Chfr appears cell cycle dependent. Because in cells expressing RING-finger-deleted Chfr, protein expression remains constant throughout the cell cycle, it is possible that the degradation of Chfr at mitosis is mediated by its ubiquitination activity. However, it cannot be ruled out that truncation prevents recognition of the protein by an unidentified ubiquitin ligase. The significance of Chfr degradation is unclear, and we did not observe obvious differences in cell cycle progression in cells expressing RING-less Chfr. Nevertheless, Chfr does resemble many mitotic regulators in that it is expressed in a cyclic fashion.

An important role of a checkpoint protein is to coordinate cell cycle events and regulate mechanisms that enforce proper order when the cell perceives stress. When cells are subjected to mitotic stress, Chfr delays entry into metaphase (7) . In cells expressing Chfr, the mitotic index was lower than that of either cells lacking Chfr or those expressing the RING-finger deletion mutant (Fig. 3)Citation . In cells with intact Chfr, viability was much greater in the presence of Taxol than in cells in which Chfr was either absent or presented as a RING-finger deletion mutant (Fig. 4)Citation , whereas no such difference in viability was observed in cells treated with Topotecan. These results suggest that Chfr has a role to play specifically on mitotic stress and that the ubiquitin ligase function is required to enable Chfr to delay mitotic progression in mitotic stress conditions. However, the RING domain itself is not sufficient for the function of Chfr, because a FHA domain deletion with intact RING domain is also functionally defective (7) . Chfr may ultimately resemble another RING domain protein c-Cbl, of which the RING domain alone has no affinity for platelet-derived growth factor ß-receptor but rather requires a SH2 domain to interact with its substrate (23) . In the case of Chfr, substrate binding could depend on the FHA domain, a phospho-amino acid motif (9 , 10) . Such a substrate for Chfr has not yet been identified. It is very likely that Chfr-mediated ubiquitin-dependent degradation of yet unidentified proteins contributes to its role in the mitotic stress pathway.

Many cancers show resistance to the current antimitotic drugs including Taxol and Vinca alkaloids. Thus far very little is known about the mechanisms which lead to the multidrug resistance-independent resistance in cancer cells. Whereas multidrug resistance accounts for much of the clinical resistance to taxanes and Vinca alkaloids, other mechanisms are likely important. The present results suggest an additional basis for drug resistance in cancer cells, because the loss of Chfr results in increased sensitivity to mitotic poisons. Chfr function was found to be absent, either because of mutation or loss of expression, in four of the eight human cancer cell lines examined (7) . Thus, it would seem useful to conduct a thorough examination of the status of Chfr in various tumors, as well as the role of Chfr in the sensitivity of human cancers to antimicrotubule agents. Abrogation of the Chfr-dependent pathway could make current cancer therapy more effective.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Leo Faucette for his help in setting up the mitotic index assay, Dale Haines for providing HA-tagged ubiquitin construct and advice on the in vivo ubiquitination assay, and Hongtao Yu for his-tagged human Ubc4. We also thank Jim Winkler and Randall Johnson for their generous support during the course of this work.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from a National Cancer Institute Grant CA-50771 (to P. C.), by a fellowship from Human Frontiers Science Program (to V. S.), a NIH core grant (CA06927), and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (to T. J. Y.). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Oncology Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406. Phone: (610) 270-6638; Fax: (610) 270-5005; Email: Bin-Bing_S_Zhou{at}gsk.com Back

3 The abbreviations used are: FHA, fork head-associated; APC/C, anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome; GST, glutathione S-transferase; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; GFP, green fluorescence protein; ubiquitin, ubiquitin; FBS, fetal bovine serum; XTT, 2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt; HA-ubiquitin, HA-tagged construct of ubiquitin. Back

Received 10/11/01. Accepted 1/18/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. McIntosh J. R., Koonce M. P. Mitosis. Science (Wash. DC), 246: 622-628, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jordan M. A., Wilson L. Microtubules and actin filaments: dynamic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10: 123-130, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Pines J., Rieder C. L. Re-staging mitosis: a contemporary view of mitotic progression. Nat. Cell. Biol., 3: E3-E6, 2001.[Medline]
  4. Mitchison T. J., Salmon E. D. Mitosis: a history of division. Nat. Cell. Biol., 3: E17-E21, 2001.[Medline]
  5. Amon A. The spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 9: 69-75, 1999.[Medline]
  6. Muhua L., Adames N. R., Murphy M. D., Shields C. R., Cooper J. A. A cytokinesis checkpoint requiring the yeast homologue of an APC-binding protein. Nature (Lond.), 393: 487-491, 1998.[Medline]
  7. Scolnick D. M., Halazonetis T. D. Chfr defines a mitotic stress checkpoint that delays entry into metaphase. Nature (Lond.), 406: 430-435, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Murray A. W., Kirschner M. W. Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle. Science (Wash. DC), 246: 614-621, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Durocher D., Henckel J., Fersht A. R., Jackson S. P. The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell, 4: 387-394, 1999.[Medline]
  10. Liao H., Byeon I. J., Tsai M. D. Structure and function of a new phosphopeptide-binding domain containing the FHA2 of Rad53. J. Mol. Biol., 294: 1041-1049, 1999.[Medline]
  11. Freemont P. S. RING for destruction?. Curr. Biol., 10: R84-R87, 2000.[Medline]
  12. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67: 425-479, 1998.[Medline]
  13. King R. W., Deshaies R. J., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science (Wash. DC), 274: 1652-1659, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Leverson J. D., Joazeiro C. A., Page A. M., Huang H. k., Hieter P., Hunter T. The APC11 RING-H2 finger mediates E2-dependent ubiquitination. Mol. Biol. Cell, 11: 2315-2325, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gmachl M., Gieffers C., Podtelejnikov A. V., Mann M., Peters J. M. The RING-H2 finger protein APC11 and the E2 enzyme UBC4 are sufficient to ubiquitinate substrates of the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 8973-8978, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chan G. K., Schaar B. T., Yen T. J. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol., 143: 49-63, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sudakin V., Ganoth D., Dahan A., Heller H., Hershko J., Luca F. C., Ruderman J. V., Hershko A. The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell, 6: 185-197, 1995.[Abstract]
  18. Scudiero D. A., Shoemaker R. H., Paull K. D., Monks A., Tierney S., Nofziger T. H., Currens M. J., Seniff D., Boyd M. R. Evaluation of a soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth and drug sensitivity in culture using human and other tumor cell lines. Cancer Res., 48: 4827-4834, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ryan A. J., Squires S., Strutt H. L., Evans A., Johnson R. T. Different fates of camptothecin-induced replication fork-associated double-strand DNA breaks in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 823-828, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kingsbury W. D., Boehm J. C., Jakas D. R., Holden K. G., Hecht S. M., Gallagher G., Caranfa M. J., McCabe F. L., Faucette L. F., Johnson R. K., Hertzberg R. P. Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogues: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity. J. Med. Chem., 34: 98-107, 1991.[Medline]
  21. Chaturvedi P., Eng W-K., Zhu Y., Mattern M. R., Mishra R., Hurle M. R., Zhang X., Annan R. S., Lu Q., Faucette L. F., Scott G. F., Li X., Carr S. A., Johnson R. K., Winkler J. D., Zhou B. B. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Oncogene, 18: 404-454, 1999.
  22. Liao H., Winkfein R. J., Mack G., Rattner J. B., Yen T. J. CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis. J. Cell Biol., 130: 507-518, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Joazeiro C. A., Wing S. S., Huang H., Leverson J. D., Hunter T., Liu Y. C. The tyrosine kinase negative regulator c-Cbl as a RING-type, E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase. Science (Wash. DC), 286: 309-312, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Maddika, S. M.-H. Sy, and J. Chen
Functional Interaction between Chfr and Kif22 Controls Genomic Stability
J. Biol. Chem., May 8, 2009; 284(19): 12998 - 13003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-P. Gagne, M. Isabelle, K. S. Lo, S. Bourassa, M. J. Hendzel, V. L. Dawson, T. M. Dawson, and G. G. Poirier
Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribose) binding proteins and poly(ADP-ribose)-associated protein complexes
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2008; 36(22): 6959 - 6976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. M. Privette, M. E. Gonzalez, L. Ding, C. G. Kleer, and E. M. Petty
Altered Expression of the Early Mitotic Checkpoint Protein, CHFR, in Breast Cancers: Implications for Tumor Suppression
Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6064 - 6074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. Perez de Castro, G. de Carcer, and M. Malumbres
A census of mitotic cancer genes: new insights into tumor cell biology and cancer therapy
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 899 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. C. Brandes, M. van Engeland, K. A.D. Wouters, M. P. Weijenberg, and J. G. Herman
CHFR promoter hypermethylation in colon cancer correlates with the microsatellite instability phenotype
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1152 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Bieganowski, K. Shilinski, P. N. Tsichlis, and C. Brenner
Cdc123 and Checkpoint Forkhead Associated with RING Proteins Control the Cell Cycle by Controlling eIF2{gamma} Abundance
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44656 - 44666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Mikhailov, M. Shinohara, and C. L. Rieder
Topoisomerase II and histone deacetylase inhibitors delay the G2/M transition by triggering the p38 MAPK checkpoint pathway
J. Cell Biol., August 16, 2004; 166(4): 517 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Satoh, M. Toyota, F. Itoh, Y. Sasaki, H. Suzuki, K. Ogi, T. Kikuchi, H. Mita, T. Yamashita, T. Kojima, et al.
Epigenetic Inactivation of CHFR and Sensitivity to Microtubule Inhibitors in Gastric Cancer
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8606 - 8613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
V. Simanis
Events at the end of mitosis in the budding and fission yeasts
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2003; 116(21): 4263 - 4275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Toyota, Y. Sasaki, A. Satoh, K. Ogi, T. Kikuchi, H. Suzuki, H. Mita, N. Tanaka, F. Itoh, J.-P. J. Issa, et al.
Epigenetic inactivation of CHFR in human tumors
PNAS, June 24, 2003; 100(13): 7818 - 7823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. G. Corn, M. K. Summers, F. Fogt, A. K. Virmani, A. F. Gazdar, T. D. Halazonetis, and W. S. El-Deiry
Frequent hypermethylation of the 5' CpG island of the mitotic stress checkpoint gene Chfr in colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2003; 24(1): 47 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaturvedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, B.-B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaturvedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, B.-B. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online