Cancer Research Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaRochelle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichenstein, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaRochelle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichenstein, H. S.
[Cancer Research 62, 2468-2473, May 1, 2002]
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research

Advances in Brief

Platelet-derived Growth Factor D

Tumorigenicity in Mice and Dysregulated Expression in Human Cancer

William J. LaRochelle1, Michael Jeffers, Jose R. F. Corvalan, Xiao-Chi Jia, Xiao Feng, Sandra Vanegas, Justin D. Vickroy, Xiao-Dong Yang, Francine Chen, Gadi Gazit, Jane Mayotte, Jennifer Macaluso, Beth Rittman, Frank Wu, Mohan Dhanabal, John Herrmann and Henri S. Lichenstein

CuraGen Corp., Branford, Connecticut 06405 [W. J. L., M. J., J. May., J. Mac., B. R., F. W., M. D., J. H., H. S. L.] and Abgenix Inc., Fremont, California 94555 [J. R. F. C., X-C. J., X. F., S. V., J. D. V., X-D. Y., F. C., G. G.]


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) has been directly implicated in developmental and physiological processes, as well as in human cancer and other proliferative disorders. We have recently isolated and characterized a novel protease-activated member of the PDGF family, PDGF D. PDGF D has been shown to be proliferative for cells of mesenchymal origin, signaling through PDGF receptors. Comprehensive and systematic PDGF D transcript analysis revealed expression in many cell lines derived from ovarian, renal, and lung cancers, as well as from astrocytomas and medulloblastomas. ß PDGF receptor profiling further suggested autocrine signaling in several brain tumor cell lines. PDGF D transforming ability and tumor formation in SCID mice was further demonstrated. Exploiting a sensitive PDGF D sandwich ELISA using fully human monoclonal antibodies, PDGF D was detected at elevated levels in the sera of ovarian, renal, lung, and brain cancer patients. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed PDGF D localization to ovarian and lung tumor tissues. Together, these data demonstrate that PDGF D plays a role in certain human cancers.


   Introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
To identify pharmaceutical targets for development of protein therapeutic drugs, mAb, and small molecule antagonists, we are searching human databases that contain coding regions for virtually all expressed genes in a specific tissue, including rarely expressed and novel transcripts. As part of the process of functionally annotating genes that are relevant to human disease, we identified the protease-activated PDGF2 D (1 , 2) .

Although PDGFs play an important role in normal development, accumulating evidence suggests that their abnormal expression also contributes to a variety of diseases. This is emphasized by the fact that PDGFs and their receptors are currently under investigation as targets in numerous proliferative disorders, including cancer and cardiovascular and fibrotic diseases (3 , 4) . The PDGF family currently consists of at least four distinct genes, PDGF A, PDGF B, PDGF C, and PDGF D, whose gene products selectively signal through two distinct PDGFRs to regulate cellular functions. PDGF A and B transforming ability and tumor formation in mouse xenograft models have been thoroughly characterized (3, 4, 5, 6) . Recently, however, database mining has resulted in the discovery of PDGF C (7 , 8) and PDGF D (1 , 2) . PDGF A and PDGF C were reported to selectively activate {alpha} PDGFR (7 , 9) . In a subsequent report, PDGF C was shown to require an {alpha} PDGFR-related mechanism to activate the ß PDGFR (10) . PDGF B and PDGF D have been shown to activate both {alpha} and ß PDGFRs (1 , 2 , 9) .

Here, we investigate the role of PDGF D in neoplasia. We first demonstrate that many cancer cell lines express PDGF D mRNA and that some of these cell lines also express ß PDGFR, suggesting autocrine signaling events. Consistent with its previously described growth stimulatory properties, we show that PDGF D induces ß PDGFR autophosphorylation, transforms NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, and promotes tumor formation in vivo. Furthermore, PDGF D is detected in many human cancer sera and tumor tissues. Collectively, these observations suggest that PDGF D plays a role in some human malignancies.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cells.
Mammalian tumor-derived cell lines (American Type Culture Collection), 293-EBNA cells (Invitrogen), and endothelial cells (Clonetics) were obtained from commercial sources. Human PDGF A and PDGF B were purchased from R&D Systems.

RTQ-PCR Expression Analysis.
RNA samples derived from normal human tissues were obtained commercially (Clontech; Invitrogen; Research Genetics). Cell lines were grown according to specifications. RNAs were harvested, and PCR was performed as described previously (1) using TaqMan reagents (PE Applied Biosystems). RNAs were normalized using human ß-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase TaqMan probes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal quantities of normalized RNA were used as templates in PCR reactions with PDGF D-specific reagents to obtain CT values. For graphic representation, CT numbers were converted to percentage expression, relative to the sample exhibiting the highest level of expression. Primers used for PDGF D analysis were: forward primer (5'-CGCTTGGCATCATCATTGAG-3'); reverse primer (5'-CGGTATCGAGGCAGGTCATAC-3'); TaqMan probe (5'-FAM-TCCAGGTCAACTTTTGACTTCCGGTCA-TAMRA-3'). Primers used for PDGF B analysis were: forward primer (5'-AAGATCGAGATTGTGCGGAAGA-3'); reverse primer (5'-ACTTGCATGCCAGGTGGTCT-3'); TaqMan probe (5'-FAM-CCAGCGTCACCGTGGCCTTCTTAA-TAMRA-3').

ß PDGFR Phosphotyrosine Analysis.
Cell lysates were prepared from 3 x 106 T98G or SK-N-AS cells, as well as 1 x 106 NIH 3T3-PDGF D transfectants starved 24 h and immunoprecipitated with control or ß PDGFR antibody as described previously (1) . Filters were probed with anti-PY20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or ß PDGFR antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).

NIH 3T3 Transformation and SCID Mouse Tumor Assay.
NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with pMT (11) -PDGF D using Lipofectamine-Plus according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Life Technologies, Inc., Bethesda, MD). pMT-PDGF D was engineered to express the proteolytically processed and thus activated PDGF D p35 as described previously (1) . NIH 3T3 cells were supplemented with 10% CS (Life Technologies, Inc.) 5 h post-transfection. Two days after transfection, PDGF D-transfected cells were split into DMEM/10% CS supplemented with 600 µg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.). To generate control cells, NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with control pMT vector and selected as described above. After 2 weeks of culture, pools of transfected cells were trypsinized, neutralized with DMEM/10% CS, washed with PBS, and counted. Transfected cells in PBS (2 x 106) were injected into the lateral subcutis of female SCID mice. Tumors were measured with calipers every 3–4 days.

Generation of Fully Human PDGF D Monoclonal Antibodies.
Fully human PDGF D mAbs were generated as described previously (12) with the following modifications. Briefly, the human IgG2-bearing XenoMouse strain (8–10 weeks old) was immunized twice weekly by footpad injection with 10 µg of V5-tagged soluble PDGF D (1) in complete Freund’s adjuvant (12) . Hybridomas were generated using electro-cell fusion. mAbs did not recognize PDGF A, PDGF B, or PDGF C by ELISA or immunoprecipitation.

PDGF D ELISA.
A sandwich ELISA was developed to quantify PDGF D levels in human serum. The two fully human mAbs (1.6 and 1.17) used in the sandwich ELISA recognized different epitopes on the PDGF D molecule (data not shown). The ELISA was performed as follows: 50 µl of capture antibody (mAb 1.6) in coating buffer [0.1 M NaHCO3 (pH 9.6)] at a concentration of 2 µg/ml was coated on ELISA plates (Fisher). After incubation at 4°C overnight, the plates were treated with 200 µl of blocking buffer (0.5% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.01% Thimerosal in PBS) for 1 h at 25°C. The plates were washed (three times) using 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS (washing buffer). Normal or patient sera (Clinomics; Bioreclamation; Cooperative Human Tissue Network) were diluted in blocking buffer containing 50% human serum. The plates were incubated with serum samples overnight at 4°C, washed with washing buffer, and then incubated with 100 µl/well biotinylated detection mAb 1.17 for 1 h at 25°C. After washing, the plates were incubated with HRP-streptavidin for 15 min, washed as before, and then treated with 100 µl/well O-phenylenediamine in H2O2 (Sigma developing solution) for color generation. The reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4 and analyzed using an ELISA plate reader at 492 nm. The concentration of PDGF D in serum samples was calculated by comparison to a PDGF D standard curve using a four parameter curve fitting program.

PDGF D Immunohistochemistry.
PDGF D immunohistochemistry was performed with biotinylated fully human mAb 6.4, and streptavidin-HRP was used for detection. Briefly, tissues were deparaffinized using conventional techniques and treated with trypsin (0.15%) for 10 min at 37°C. Sections were incubated with 10% normal goat serum for 10 min. Normal goat serum solution was drained, and excess solution was removed. Sections were incubated with the biotinylated anti-PDGF D mAb at 5 µg/ml for 30 min at 25°C and washed thoroughly with PBS. After incubation with streptavidin-HRP conjugate for 10 min, a solution of diaminobenzidine was applied onto the sections to visualize the immunoreactivity. For the isotype control, sections were incubated with biotinylated isotype-matched negative control mAb at 5 µg/ml for 30 min at 25°C instead of biotinylated PDGF D mAb.


   Results and Discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
REFERENCES
 
PDGF D Transcript Expression and Signaling in Human Cancer Cell Lines.
We examined the mRNA expression profile of PDGF D in cell lines derived from cancers of multiple origins using RTQ-PCR. The primer/probe set used was designed to be PDGF D specific and, as such, did not detect other known PDGF family members. In a representative experiment (Fig. 1A)Citation , PDGF D was most highly expressed in the lung cancer cell lines, such as NCI-H596, SW900, HOP62, and A549. Moderate levels of PDGF D were found in ovarian cancer cell lines, such as IGROV-1 and OVCAR-8. Several CNS-derived astrocytoma/glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cell lines, such as U251, SNB-19, SNB-75, SK-N-AS, and SW1783, also showed moderate expression. PDGF D was also expressed to a lesser extent in most melanoma cell lines tested. In a separate set of experiments (Fig. 1B)Citation , PDGF D was highly expressed in the lung cancer cell line NCI-UMC-11, as well as the astrocytoma-derived SF-295 and neuroblastoma-derived T98G. An ovarian (RL95-2), renal (Caki-2), lung (NCI-H146), and astrocytoma (SK-N-SH) cell line showed moderate expression. Of note, PDGF D was detected in only 2 of 17 colon cancer cell lines tested. These data demonstrate that PDGF D transcript is expressed in many ovarian, lung, renal, and brain cancer-derived cell lines.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Analysis of PDGF D transcript expression and ß PDGFR tyrosine phosphorylation. RTQ-PCR analysis was performed on cancer cell lines (A and B) using PDGF D-specific TaqMan reagents on normalized RNA derived from the indicated samples. Expression is graphed as a percentage of the sample exhibiting the highest expression. A and B, normalized to CT values of 27.4 and 29, respectively, except T98G, which had a CT = 27.5. C, expression analysis of PDGF D, PDGF B, and PDGFRs in CNS-derived tumor cell lines. CT values of 25–25.9, 26–27.9, 28–29.9, 30–35, and >35 are depicted by the colors red, orange, tan, blue, and dark blue, respectively. CT values of >35 (dark blue) are considered negative expression. D, ß PDGFR tyrosine phosphorylation. T98G (Lanes 1 and 2), SK-N-AS (Lane 3), and NIH 3T3-PDGF D transfectants (Lane 4) were starved for 24 h. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with control (Lane 1) or ß PDGFR (Lanes 2–4) antibody followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-PY20 mAb (top panel) or ß PDGFR antibody (bottom panel). Bound primary antibody was detected as indicated in "Materials and Methods."

 
To gain further insight into PDGF D function (1) , we examined mRNA expression of PDGF B, PDGF D, and the {alpha} and ß PDGFRs through which they signal. The expression analysis was performed using RNA derived from a set of CNS-derived tumor cell lines. Data summarized in Fig. 1CCitation demonstrated that PDGF D and PDGF B transcript were expressed in 10 and 7 of the 17 cell lines, respectively. Five cell lines expressed mRNA for both PDGF D and PDGF B. Five cell lines had only PDGF D mRNA and 2 expressed only that of PDGF B, whereas 5 cell lines contained neither transcript.

Autocrine signaling was suggested for 6 of 11 astrocytoma/glioblastoma cell lines and 2 of 4 medulloblastoma/neuroblastoma cell lines based on coexpression of PDGF D mRNA with the {alpha} and ß PDGFR transcripts (Fig. 1C)Citation . PDGF D was coexpressed with the ß PDGFR alone in 2 medulloblastoma/neuroblastoma cell lines. PDGF B was expressed with the ß PDGFR in all 7 PDGF B-positive lines. PDGF D and PDGF B were coexpressed in 5 of these lines. We further found that PDGF D was not coexpressed with the ß PDGFR in the vast majority of other cancer cell lines tested with the exception of OVCAR-8, G401, and HOP62 (data not shown).

To test if PDGF D could participate in a functional autocrine loop, we examined ß PDGFR autophosphorylation in T98G and SK-N-AS cells that possess little or no PDGF B transcript expression. As shown in Fig. 1DCitation , ß PDGFR tyrosine phosphorylation was detected in antiphosphotyrosine immunoblots of T98G cell lysates first immunoprecipitated with a ß PDGFR-specific antibody. ß PDGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, albeit to a lesser extent, was also observed in SK-N-AS immunoprecipitates. Furthermore, potent ß PDGFR tyrosine phosphorylation was detected in NIH 3T3-PDGF D transfectants (Fig. 1D)Citation . Tyrosine phosphorylated ß PDGFR was not detected using control antibody (Fig. 1D)Citation or control NIH 3T3 transfectant immunoprecipitates (data not shown). These results show that although PDGF D is expressed as a paracrine factor by many cancer cell lines, an autocrine signaling component exists in some astrocytoma and medulloblastoma cell lines.

PDGF D Induces Morphological Transformation In Vitro and Tumor Formation In Vivo.
To determine whether ectopic PDGF D expression induced cell transformation, NIH 3T3 transfectants were generated. The resulting NIH 3T3 PDGF D transfectants exhibited foci of morphologically transformed cells characterized by a dense, disorganized pattern of growth, comprised of individual cells found to be spindly in shape with increased refractivity. NIH 3T3 cells transfected with control vector retained a normal morphology (Fig. 2, A and B)Citation . In separate experiments, NIH 3T3 cells treated in culture with purified PDGF D for 2 days also became morphologically transformed in appearance, whereas mock-treated cells remained unchanged (data not shown).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Transformation and tumor formation in SCID mice. NIH 3T3 cells, transfected with pMT-PDGF D (A) or control pMT vector alone (B), were injected into the subcutis of SCID mice and examined for tumor formation over 25 days (C). Tumor volume was obtained by measuring the tumors with calipers and using the following formula: length x width x depth. A minimum of four animals was used for each data point. All animals injected with PDGF D-transfected cells developed rapidly growing tumors after 2 weeks. No animals injected with control NIH 3T3 transfectants developed significant tumors by 25 days.

 
To assess the ability of PDGF D to induce tumor formation in vivo, PDGF D and control vector transfectants were injected s.c. into SCID mice. By 18 days, all of the animals injected with PDGF D-transfected cells possessed rapidly growing tumors, whereas none of the animals injected with control cells had tumors (Fig. 2C)Citation . After 25 days, the tumorigenicity of PDGF D was evident with a mean tumor size approaching 2500 mm3 . Examination of lung and other tissues detected no metastases. All of the data clearly demonstrate that PDGF D has potent growth-stimulating potential in vitro and oncogenic potential in vivo.

PDGF D Serum Levels in Patients with Cancer.
As an additional step in determining whether PDGF D might be involved in human cancer, we surveyed serum levels from patients with various types of malignancy. Serum PDGF D concentrations were assessed using a quantitative sandwich ELISA with two fully human mAbs raised against PDGF D. The ELISA was specific for PDGF D and had a sensitivity of 4 ng/ml. As shown in Fig. 3Citation , PDGF D was expressed at concentrations > 10 ng/ml in 28% of sera from patients with cancer (n = 245), compared with 6% of normal sera (n = 50). The mean PDGF D serum concentration was significantly elevated in sera from patients with medulloblastoma (P = 0.004) and astrocytoma (P = 0.019), as well as ovarian (P = 0.001), lung (P = 0.004), bladder (P = 0.001), renal (P = 0.002) and breast (P = 0.002) cancers. In some ovarian cancer and medulloblastoma patients, concentrations > 40 ng/ml were detected. The growth factor was below detection levels in sera from patients with lymphoma and myeloma. The mean serum levels of PDGF D in cancer patients ranged from ~4 to 15 ng/ml, compared with a concentration of <4 ng/ml in normal individuals. These data demonstrate that PDGF D is elevated in the sera of patients with certain malignancies.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Detection of PDGF D in human normal and cancer sera. PDGF D in human serum was quantified using a sandwich ELISA as described in "Materials and Methods." The sandwich ELISA did not recognize PDGF A, PDGF B, or PDGF C. {bullet}, the PDGF D concentration for an individual clinical serum sample. PDGF D serum concentrations are grouped according to the patient disease indication. The number (n) of patients for a given clinical indication is provided, along with the mean PDGF D concentration in ng/ml.

 
Immunohistochemical Analysis of PDGF D in Cancer.
The elevated level of PDGF D in certain cancer cell lines and sera suggested that PDGF D might be expressed in human tumor tissue. Therefore, the expression of PDGF D was examined in human cancers by immunohistochemical analysis. The PDGF D mAb used in this study specifically recognized PDGF D and not PDGF A, B, or C based on either ELISA or Western blot analysis (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4BCitation , normal lung tissue did not stain for PDGF D. However, immunohistochemical analysis of PDGF D in lung tumor tissue detected PDGF D staining (Fig. 4D)Citation . The PDGF D mAb showed uniform staining of normal ovary (Fig. 4F)Citation . Staining of ovarian tumor tissue revealed increased PDGF D staining of tumor cells and surrounding stroma (Fig. 4H)Citation . Ovary and lung tissues, both normal and tumor, were uniformly negative when stained with the control mAb. In situ hybridization experiments will be necessary to determine the precise cellular origin of the detected PDGF D. All of these data suggest that PDGF D is aberrantly localized in some specific tumor tissues and may play a role in tumorigenesis.



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. Immunohistochemical analysis of PDGF D in human cancer tissues. Localization of PDGF D in normal lung (B) and lung cancer (D) was determined immunohistochemically using a mAb specific for PDFG D. Control mAb showed no staining of these tissues (A and C). Localization of PDGF D in human ovary (F) or ovarian cancer (H) was determined in a similar manner. Control mAb staining of normal ovary (E) and ovarian cancer is shown (G). PDGF D immunohistochemistry was performed with biotinylated mAb and detected with streptavidin-HRP as described in "Materials and Methods" (magnification x40).

 
The role of autocrine PDGF A and PDGF B signaling in cancer has been well documented (3, 4, 5, 6) . Here we found that the PDGF D transcript is expressed in an autocrine signaling loop with the ß PDGFR in several astrocytoma/glioblastoma and medulloblastoma/neuroblastoma cell lines. Interestingly, the astrocytoma cell lines all expressed PDGF A (except SK-N-AS), PDGF C, and {alpha} PDGFR transcript.3 PDGF B mRNA was expressed in some of the astrocytoma and medulloblastoma cell lines as well. Therefore, in cell lines that contain both PDGFRs, PDGF B, PDGF C, and PDGF D would be expected to complete autocrine signaling events through {alpha} and ß PDGFRs. Although the breadth of PDGF and PDGFR expression underscores a role for autocrine PDGF signaling in brain tumor formation, the contribution of each PDGF and PDGFR to these events will be the subject of future investigations.

We reported previously that PDGF D proliferative activity depends on the proteolytic removal of its CUB domain and that the p84 uncleaved ligand did not interact with PDGFRs (1) . Consistent with these observations, we found that only the p35 active form of PDGF D caused transformation of NIH 3T3 cells and tumor formation in mice (Fig. 2)Citation .4 Thus, PDGF D transformation and tumorigenesis also depended on the proteolytic removal of the CUB domain. Because CUB domains have also been shown to specify protein-protein interactions (13) , it is tempting to speculate that the PDGF D CUB domain may play the dual role of specifying protease interaction, as well as blocking receptor interaction. Although the PDGF D-activating protease(s) have yet to be identified, enzymes such as stromelysin and MMP-3, are induced after PDGFR activation and also in many cancers (14) . The role of these proteases in PDGF D activation and human cancer progression is currently under investigation.

PDGF D maps to a human chromosomal locus (11q23-24) of recognized genomic instability (15) . Coincidentally, this region also encodes matrix metalloproteinases (16) and shows gene copy number variations in some diseases, e.g., Jacobsen’s syndrome is marked by craniofacial, heart, and glandular abnormalities, as well as lack of brain development (17) . These disease manifestations might be explained in part by aberrant growth factor expression. Of particular interest is the amplification about this locus in glioblastoma multiforme (18) and childhood medulloblastoma (19) . Amplifications or deletions in the region of chromosome 11q23-24 have also been implicated in lung cancer (20) , ovarian cancer (21) , and primary sarcomas (22) . Of note, lung A549 cells that show elevated PDGF D transcript also possess 11q23-24 amplification (20) . Considering the role that PDGFs play in malignancy (3) , it is possible that inappropriate expression of PDGF D, whether paracrine or autocrine, may contribute to cancers associated with chromosome 11q23-24 abnormalities. The elevated PDGF D expression that we observe in human cell lines, sera, and cancer tissues supports such a hypothesis.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Greg Landes, Bruce Keyt, Mary K. Shean, Rick Shimkets, Mehdi Mesri, Donna Murray, Gary Starling, Cyndi Green, and Alan Cheeks for helpful comments and discussions.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at 22 East Main Street, Branford, CT 06405. Phone: (203) 871-4288; Fax: (203) 315-3301; E-mail: wlarochelle{at}curagen.com Back

2 The abbreviations used are: PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; RTQ, real-time quantitative; CT, threshold cycle; CS, calf serum; mAb, monoclonal antibody; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; NCI, National Cancer Institute; CNS, central nervous system. Back

3 W. J. LaRochelle, unpublished observations. Back

4 M. Jeffers and W. J. LaRochelle, unpublished observations. Back

Received 1/18/02. Accepted 3/19/02.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. LaRochelle W. J., Jeffers M., McDonald W. F., Chillakuru R. A., Giese N. A., Lokker N. A., Sullivan C., Boldog F. L., Yang M., Vernet C., Burgess C. E., Fernandes E., Deegler L. L., Rittman B., Shimkets J., Shimkets R. A., Rothberg J. M., Lichenstein H. S. PDGF D, a new protease-activated growth factor. Nat. Cell Biol., 3: 517-521, 2001.[Medline]
  2. Bergsten E., Uutela M., Li X., Pietras K., Ostman A., Heldin C., Alitalo K., Eriksson U. PDGF-D is a specific, protease-activated ligand for the PDGF ß-receptor. Nat. Cell Biol., 3: 512-516, 2001.[Medline]
  3. Heldin C., Westermark B. Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol. Rev., 79: 1283-1316, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Fleming T., Matsui T., Heidaran M., Molloy C., Artrip J., Aaronson S. Demonstration of an activated platelet-derived growth factor autocrine pathway and its role in human tumor cell proliferation in vitro. Oncogene, 7: 1355-1359, 1992.[Medline]
  5. Nister M., Heldin C., Wasteson A., Westermark B. A glioma-derived analog to platelet-derived growth factor: demonstration of receptor competing activity and immunological crossreactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81: 926-930, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Robbins K., Devare S., Reddy E., Aaronson S. In vivo identification of the transforming gene product of simian sarcoma virus. Science, 218: 1131-1133, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Li X., Ponten A., Aase K., Karlsson L., Abramsson A. PDGF-C is a new protease-activated ligand for the PDGF {alpha} receptor. Nat. Cell Biol., 2: 302-309, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Hamada T., Ui-Tei K., Miyata Y. A novel gene derived from developing spinal cords. SCDGF, is a unique member of the PDGF/VEGF family. FEBS Lett., 475: 97-102, 2000.[Medline]
  9. Matsui T., Heidaran M., Miki T., Popescu N., La Rochelle W., Kraus M., Pierce J., Aaronson S. A. Isolation of a novel receptor cDNA establishes the existence of two PDGF receptor genes. Science, 243: 800-804, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gilbertson D., Duff M., West J., Kelly J., Sheppard P., Hofstrand P., Gao Z., Shoemaker K., Bukowski T., Moore M., Feldhaus A., Humes J., Palmer T., Hart C. Platelet-derived growth factor C (PDGF-C), a novel growth factor that binds to PDGF {alpha} and ß receptor. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 27406-27414, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Palmiter R., Sandgren E., Koeller D., Brinster R. Distal regulatory elements from the mouse metallothionein locus stimulate gene expression in transgenic mice. Mol. Cell. Biol., 13: 5266-5275, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yang X., Corvalan J., Wang P., Roy C., Davis C. Fully human anti-interleukin-8 monoclonal antibodies: potential therapeutics for the treatment of inflammatory disease states. J. Leukoc. Biol., 66: 401-410, 1999.[Abstract]
  13. Bersch B., Hernandez J., Marion D., Arlaud G. Solution structure of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like module of human complement protease C1r, an atypical member of the EGF family. Biochemistry, 37: 1204-1214, 1998.[Medline]
  14. Johansson N., Ahonen M., Kahari V. E. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 57: 5-15, 2000.[Medline]
  15. Kurahashi H., Shaikh T., Hu P., Roe B., Emanuel B., Budarf M. Regions of genomic instability on 22q11 and 11q23 as the etiology for the recurrent constitutional t(11;22). Hum. Mol. Genet., 9: 1665-1670, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pendas A., Matilla T., Estivill X., Lopez-Otin C. The human collagenase-3 (CLG3) gene is located on chromosome 11q22.3 clustered to other members of the matrix metalloproteinase gene family. Genomics, 26: 615-618, 1995.[Medline]
  17. Pivnick E., Velagaleti G., Wilroy R., Smith M., Rose S., Tipton R., Tharapel A. Jacobsen syndrome: report of a patient with severe eye anomalies, growth hormone deficiency, and hypothyroidism associated with deletion 11 (q23q25) and review of 52 cases. J. Med. Genet., 33: 772-778, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Weber R., Sommer C., Albert F., Kiessling M., Cremer T. Clinically distinct subgroups of glioblastoma multiforme studied by comparative genomic hybridization. Lab. Investig., 74: 108-119, 1996.[Medline]
  19. Reardon D., Michalkiewicz E., Boyett J., Sublett J., Entrekin R., Ragsdale S., Valentine M., Behm F., Li H., Heideman R., Kun L., Shapiro D., Look A. Extensive genomic abnormalities in childhood medulloblastoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res., 57: 4042-4047, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Struski S., Doco-Fenzy M., Trussard A., Masson L., Gruson N., Ulrich E., Proult M., Jardillier J., Potron G., Cornillet-Lefebvre P. Identification of chromosomal loci associated with non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance to topoisomerase II inhibitor in lung adenocarcinoma cell line by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 30: 136-142, 2001.[Medline]
  21. Foulkes W., Campbell I., Stamp G., Trowsdale J. Loss of heterozygosity and amplification on chromosome 11q in human ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 67: 268-273, 1993.[Medline]
  22. Tarkkanen M., Huuhtanen R., Virolainen M., Wiklund T., Asko-Seljavaara S., Tukiainen E., Lepantalo M., Elomaa I., Knutila S. Comparison of genetic changes in primary sarcomas and their pulmonary metastases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 25: 323-331, 1999.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Wang, D. Kong, S. Banerjee, Y. Li, N. V. Adsay, J. Abbruzzese, and F. H. Sarkar
Down-regulation of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-D Inhibits Cell Growth and Angiogenesis through Inactivation of Notch-1 and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Signaling
Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11377 - 11385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
M. Y. Liu, M. Eyries, C. Zhang, F. S. Santiago, and L. M. Khachigian
Inducible platelet-derived growth factor D-chain expression by angiotensin II and hydrogen peroxide involves transcriptional regulation by Ets-1 and Sp1
Blood, March 15, 2006; 107(6): 2322 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. V. Ustach and H.-R. C. Kim
Platelet-Derived Growth Factor D Is Activated by Urokinase Plasminogen Activator in Prostate Carcinoma Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2005; 25(14): 6279 - 6288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L. Xu, R. Tong, D. M. Cochran, and R. K. Jain
Blocking Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-D/Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor {beta} Signaling Inhibits Human Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression in an Orthotopic Mouse Model
Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5711 - 5719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
M. Uutela, M. Wirzenius, K. Paavonen, I. Rajantie, Y. He, T. Karpanen, M. Lohela, H. Wiig, P. Salven, K. Pajusola, et al.
PDGF-D induces macrophage recruitment, increased interstitial pressure, and blood vessel maturation during angiogenesis
Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3198 - 3204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C. V. Ustach, M. E. Taube, N. J. Hurst Jr., S. Bhagat, R. D. Bonfil, M. L. Cher, L. Schuger, and H.-R. C. Kim
A Potential Oncogenic Activity of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor D in Prostate Cancer Progression
Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 64(5): 1722 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. Ostendorf, C. R.C. van Roeyen, J. D. Peterson, U. Kunter, F. Eitner, A. J. Hamad, G. Chan, X.-C. Jia, J. Macaluso, G. Gazit-Bornstein, et al.
A Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody (CR002) Identifies PDGF-D as a Novel Mediator of Mesangioproliferative Glomerulonephritis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2003; 14(9): 2237 - 2247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaRochelle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichenstein, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaRochelle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichenstein, H. S.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online