Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, J. C.
[Cancer Research 63, 2610-2615, May 15, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

A Transforming Growth Factorß1 Signal Peptide Variant Increases Secretion in Vitro and Is Associated with Increased Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer1

Alison M. Dunning2,3, Peter D. Ellis3, Simon McBride, Heidi L Kirschenlohr, Catherine S. Healey, Paul R. Kemp, Robert N. Luben, Jenny Chang-Claude, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Douglas F. Easton, Bruce A. J. Ponder and James C. Metcalfe

Cancer Research United Kingdom Department of Oncology [A. M. D., S. M., C. S. H., P. D. P.P., B. A. J. P.] and Genetic Epidemiology Group [P. D. P. P., D. F. E.] and European Prospective Investigation of Cancer [R. N. L.], University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom [P. D. E., H. L. K., P. R. K., J. C. M.]; Abteilung Epidemiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany [J. C-C.]; and Departments of Pathology [A. M.] and Oncology [V. K.], Kuopio University and University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is evidence that transforming growth factor (TGF)ß acts as a suppressor of tumor initiation but also as a promoter of tumor progression when the antiproliferative effect of the TGFß signaling pathway has been overridden by other oncogenic mutations. Several somatic mutations that disrupt the TGFß-SMAD signaling pathway have been reported in human breast tumors. We have examined the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TGFß1 gene and the incidence of invasive breast cancer in three case-control series, with a maximum of 3987 patients and 3867 controls, median age ~50 years, and range 22–92 years. The promoter SNP, C-509T, and the T +29C signal-peptide SNP (encoding Leu10Pro) are in strong linkage disequilibrium. They are both significantly associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer in a recessive manner [odds ratios: (TT versus C-carrier), 1.25; 95% confidence intervals 1.06–1.48; P = 0.009 and (ProPro versus Leu-carrier), 1.21; 95% confidence intervals 1.05–1.37; P = 0.01]. The G-800A SNP was not significantly associated with incidence of breast cancer. The C-509T SNP is not contained within a known consensus sequence for a promoter regulatory element and therefore unlikely to affect TGFß1 expression, whereas the Leu10Pro signal peptide substitution potentially affects TGFß1 secretion. Transfections of HeLa cells with constructs encoding either the Pro or Leu forms of TGFß1 and driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter indicate that the signal peptide with Pro at residue 10 causes a 2.8-fold increase in secretion compared with the Leu form. These data indicate that the allele encoding Pro10 is associated with increased rates of TGFß1 secretion and with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer for the population samples described. It is estimated that 3% of all breast cancer cases may be attributable to Pro10 homozygosity.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
First-degree relatives of breast cancer patients have an ~2-fold increased risk over the general population of developing the disease, but <25% of this excess risk is explained by inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (1) , which are associated with substantially increased risk of breast cancer. Data from the large multiple case families suggest that other high penetrance genes will be rare. It is therefore plausible that there are multiple common low risk (low penetrance) genetic variants, which are associated with relatively small effects on risk of breast cancer in the individual but contribute substantially to the overall risk in the population (2) .

In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that TGFß4 is a critical regulator of normal and transformed epithelial cell phenotypes, functioning as both a tumor suppressor and promoter of tumor progression and invasion. For most normal cell types, TGFß acts in vitro as a potent inhibitor of proliferation and migration and promotes apoptosis, properties associated with tumor suppression (3 , 4) . However, in cells in which these suppressor functions of the TGFß signaling pathway are overridden, TGFß may induce cellular changes associated with malignant progression (5) , invasion (6) , and angiogenesis (7 , 8) . Both tumor suppressor and tumor-promoting activities of TGFß have been clearly demonstrated in a variety of genetically modified mouse lines in which the TGFß signaling pathway is ablated or modified (9) . These studies support a model in which TGFß inhibits the development of early, benign lesions but promotes invasion and metastasis when the tumor suppressor activity is overridden by oncogenic mutations in other pathways (10) . In this model, the increased levels of TGFß that are frequently detected in human tumors may contribute either to tumor suppression or progression.

Several studies have shown that somatic mutations in components of the signaling pathway of TGFß are associated with the development of human tumors of epithelial origin (11, 12, 13) , e.g., it has been estimated that >80% of colorectal tumors have inhibitory mutations in the TGFß pathway (14) . There are few reports of somatic mutations in the TGFß signaling pathway in human breast carcinomas. We have recently described four novel inhibitory mutations in the TGFßR2 gene in recurrent breast tumors (15) ; in addition, an inactivating mutation in the TGFßR1 gene has been identified in metastatic breast cancer (16) , and the absence of SMAD2-P, the activated form of SMAD2, has been shown to define a small but particularly aggressive subset of breast tumors (17) .

On the basis of these data, we have hypothesized that polymorphisms affecting the function of genes in the TGFß signaling pathway might also play a significant role in the development of breast cancer. We have therefore examined the incidence of breast cancer associated with SNPs in the TGFß1 gene that we and others (18 , 19) have described. We have analyzed three polymorphisms (C-509T, G-800A, and T +29C [Leu10Pro]) in DNA samples from three series of European patients with invasive breast cancer and controls. The T +29C transition, which generates a Leu10Pro substitution in the signal peptide of the TGFß1 precursor, was associated with altered risk of breast cancer. Because a change in the signal peptide sequence may affect protein secretion, in vitro transfection experiments have been performed to determine whether the leucine/proline substitution alters TGFß1 secretion.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Population Samples.
Numerical data for the population samples from which the cases and controls were drawn are given in Table 1Citation (the numbers of samples analyzed are given in Table 3Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Data for the female population samples from which the cases and controls were drawn

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Genotype distributions and ORs in each case-control series

 
East Anglian, British (United Kingdom).
Cases with invasive breast cancer were drawn from the ABC study. This is an ongoing population-based study of breast cancer cases ascertained through the East Anglian Cancer Registry (20) . All study participants completed an epidemiological questionnaire and provided a blood sample for DNA extraction. Controls were randomly selected from the EPIC-Norfolk component of the EPIC (21) , a prospective study of diet and cancer being carried out in the same geographical region as the ABC Study.

Heidelberg, German (HDB).
Cases were drawn from a population-based study of breast cancer, conducted across the State of Baden-Württemberg in southern Germany, and matched with controls by age and area of residence (Ref. 22 ; Table 1Citation ). The present study was confined to the subset of cases and controls from the city of Heidelberg with at least one parent of German nationality (Table 3)Citation .

Kuopio, Finnish (FINN).
Cases were drawn from the Kuopio Breast Cancer Project, a population-based study of breast cancer (23) . The controls were randomly selected and individually matched to patients by age (within 5 years) and area-of-residence using the National Population Register.

Ethical Approval.
Ethical approvals were obtained from the Anglia and Oxford Multicentre Research Committee in the United Kingdom, Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg, and Joint Ethics Committees of Kuopio University and the Kuopio University Hospital. Informed, written consent was obtained from each patient.

Genotyping.
Genotyping was carried out using Taqman according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primers and probes used for each polymorphism analyzed are shown in Table 2Citation . All reactions were carried out at 62°C. All assays were carried out in 96-well arrays. Each plate contained 24 controls: 8 negatives with no DNA template and 8 positive controls for each SNP allele, in addition to 72 DNA test samples. These controls enabled semiautomated genotyping to be carried out using a 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosytems, Warrington, United Kingdom). DNA samples that did not give a clear genotype result at the first attempt were not repeated because this is a high-throughput process, and, therefore, there are variations in the proportions of results obtained for each polymorphism as defined in Table 3Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Sequences of primers and probes used for genotyping

 
Statistical Analysis of the Association Study.
Deviations of the genotype frequencies in the controls from those expected under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were assessed by {chi}2 tests. The expected proportions of common homozygotes, heterozygotes, and rare homozygotes were p2, 2pq, and q2, respectively, where p is the population frequency of the common allele and q is that of the rare allele. The genotype frequencies in the control groups of each series did not differ significantly from Hardy-Weinberg for any of the SNPs tested. Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared by 2df {chi}2 tests. Genotype-specific risks were estimated as ORs by unconditional logistic regression (24) . CIs for the ORs were derived using the floating absolute risk method (25) . This approach yields floated standard errors and floated CIs. The method does not alter the relative risk estimates but reduces the variances attributed to the ORs that are not defined as 1 and reduces unwanted covariance between them. Results are presented for each case-control study separately and as a joint analysis. In the joint analysis, each series was treated as a separate stratum in the logistic regression model. We tested for heterogeneity between strata by comparing logistic regression models with and without a genotype-stratum interaction term using likelihood ratio tests. To test which of the two SNPs on the disease-associated haplotypes was more likely to have a functional effect, we compared three different logistic regression models (each SNP alone and both together) using likelihood ratio tests. All logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows Version 9.0 (SPSS United Kingdom Ltd.). The population attributable risk for the Pro10 allele, under a recessive model, was estimated using the formula: [q2(r - 1)]/{[q2(r - 1)] + 1}, where r is the estimated relative risk for the Pro10 homozygotes as compared with other genotypes. The excess familial relative risk to siblings of breast cancer patients attributable to Pro10Leu was estimated using the formula {lambda}s = {0.25[q2r (2) (1 - q2)] + 0.5[q(qr + p) (2) + p)] - 0.75}/{[q2r + (1 - q2)] (2) }. This was expressed as a percentage of the overall familial relative risk of breast cancer, which is ~1.8 (26) .

Transfection Vectors for TGFß1 Secretion Assays.
TGFß1 cDNAs were generated by PCR in two stages using DNA polymerase (Expand High Fidelity; Roche) and a cloned human TGFß1 cDNA (generously provided by Dr. P. ten Dijke, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) as the DNA template. cDNAs encoding the LAP portion of TGFß1 (also provided by Dr. P. ten Dijke) were amplified using a downstream oligonucleotide (5'-GCGGTGCCGGGAGCTCTGCAGATG-3') and either Leu-UP (5'-CATGCCGCCCTCCGGGCTGCGGCTGCTGCTGCTG-3') or Pro-UP (5'-CATGCCGCCCTCCGGGCTGCGGCTGCTGCCGCTG-3'), with a single base change shown underlined. PCR products were cloned into pGEMT-Easy (Promega, Madison, WI) to generate pGEM-LeuLAP and pGEM-ProLAP, respectively. cDNA encoding the active portion of TGFß1 was amplified using mUP (5'-CAGCATCTGCAGAGCTCCCGG-3') and mDOWN (5'-ACCTCAGCTGCACTTGCAGGA-3') and cloned into pGEMT-Easy to generate pGEM-active. The underlined sequence incorporates a silent mutation (CTGCAA->CTGCAG) to generate the restriction endonuclease site, PstI. TGFß1 cDNA from pGEM-active was cloned into pGEM-LeuLAP and pGEM-ProLAP as a PstI fragment to generate pGEM-L and pGEM-P, respectively. TGFß1 cDNAs from pGEM-L and pGEM-P were cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) as EcoRI fragments to generate CMV-L and CMV-P, respectively. CMV-ß-gal was generated by cloning a KpnI-ApaI DNA fragment from CMVSportß-gal (Invitrogen) into pcDNA3. All plasmid DNA was prepared using Qiagen plasmid midi-prep kits and quantified using a fluorescence-based assay (PicoGreen; Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid cDNA inserts were sequenced in both orientations using an automated DNA sequencer.

Cell Culture and Transfection.
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (v/v), penicillin (100 IU/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) in a humidified air/CO2 (95%/5%) incubator at 37°C. Cells were seeded (4 x 105 cells/well) in six-well plates in culture medium and transfected after 24 h with CMV-P, CMV-L, CMV-empty, and CMV-ß-gal as indicated. Two separate DNA preparations were used for eight separate transfection experiments performed on triplicate cell samples. Cells were transfected, as indicated, with 2 µg of total DNA with 2 µg of lipofectin per well in 1 ml of serum-free medium according to the manufacturer’s instructions. At 6 h post-transfection, the cells were aspirated and washed once with DMEM, and 2 ml of DMEM containing FCS and antibiotics were added per well. After 24 h, the cells were washed three times with DMEM and incubated in 2 ml of DMEM for periods of <=18 h. The medium was collected, centrifuged to remove any cells, and either analyzed immediately or frozen in 0.5-ml aliquots at -80°C. The cells were washed twice with PBS and assayed for ß-galactosidase activity.

TGFß1 Assays.
Before heat activation of secreted TGFß1 in conditioned medium, the TGFß1 was stabilized by adding 1/40 v/v of 1% fatty acid free-BSA in DMEM, and the pH was stabilized by adding 1/10 v/v of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.0). The TGFß1 samples were activated by heating at 80°C for 15 min and then cooled to room temperature. The concentration of heat-activated TGFß1 was assayed using the R&D (Oxford, United Kingdom) assay kit specific for TGFß1 according to instructions for cell culture supernatants. The heat-activated samples (100 µl) were diluted 1:4 in DMEM containing 100 mM TRIS-HCl (pH 7.0) and 0.02% fatty acid free-BSA to bring the TGFß1 concentrations in the linear range of the TGFß1 standard curve (0.03–2 ng/ml). TGFß levels are expressed in nanograms per milliliter ± SE, and Ps were calculated by Student’s t test.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Breast Cancer Association Studies.
Initially, the United Kingdom population series was genotyped for the two promoter SNPs: G-800A and C-509T. The rarer G-800A polymorphism was not significantly associated with any differences in incidence of breast cancer (Table 3)Citation . The TT homozygotes of the C–509T polymorphism showed an association with breast cancer incidence that was not quite formally significant [OR (TT versus CC), 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03–1.55; P = 0.08 (2df); Table 3Citation ]. These data were extended using two additional breast cancer case-control series: HDB and FINN. The ORs for the HDB series were also close to significant [OR (TT versus CC), 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02–2.27; P = 0.08 (2df); Table 3Citation ]. The FINN series did not achieve statistical significance, although the OR (TT versus CC) was marginally increased (Table 3)Citation . A joint analysis of all three series was significant [OR (TT versus CC), 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08–1.51; P = 0.02 (2df)]. There was no significant evidence of heterogeneity between the results of the three series (P = 0.9; 2df). They are all compatible with a model that T-509 is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer in a recessive manner [OR (TT versus C-carrier), 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.48; P = 0.009 (1df); Table 3Citation ].

To determine whether this observed association was attributable to the C–509T polymorphism or to another TGFß1 polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium with it, we considered the other known TGFß1 SNPs. The five common, potentially functional SNPs generate six haplotypes (18) , and the simplest sequential pathway for their derivation from the ancestral haplotype is shown in Fig. 1Citation . The frequencies shown in Fig. 1Citation are those estimated from the United Kingdom controls or data in Syrris et al. (18) . There is little evidence for intermarker recombination; these common haplotypes together constitute 96% of all of the observed haplotypes. Only the Pro10-encoding allele is both sufficiently frequent (13.5% homozygosity; Table 3Citation ) and carried on haplotypes with the T-509 allele to be a potential cause of the observed association between T-509 homozygosity (8.2%; Table 3Citation ) and the incidence of breast cancer. The Pro10-encoding allele occurs on haplotypes with both T-509 and C-509, but the converse (T-509 with Leu10) is very rarely observed. The Ile263- and Pro25-encoding alleles define very rare subsets of the T–509- and C-509-carrying haplotypes, respectively (Fig. 1)Citation , and these are too rare to explain the observed association. We therefore investigated the association of the Pro10Leu polymorphism with breast cancer risk and found that the Pro10 allele was also associated with increased risk of breast cancer in the United Kingdom [OR: (ProPro versus LeuLeu), 1.24; 95% CI 1.04–1.48; P = 0.06 (2df); Table 3Citation ]. Again, similar results were obtained in HDB [OR: (ProPro versus LeuLeu), 1.4; 95% CI 0.99–1.99; P = 0.06 (2df); Table 3Citation ]. As with the C-509T polymorphism, no strong association was seen in the FINN sample, but the joint analysis of all three series was significant: [OR (ProPro versus LeuLeu), 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06–1.44; P = 0.03; Table 3Citation ]. No significant differences in the magnitude of the ORs were observed when the cases were stratified by patient age, tumor stage, or grade at diagnosis, where recorded (data not shown). Although the HDB series provide some evidence for a codominant mode of inheritance, overall, these data fit a recessive model: [OR (ProPro versus Leu-carrier), 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05–1.37; P = 0.01 (1df); Table 3Citation ]. We conclude that rare allele homozygosities at both the C-509T and Leu10Pro loci, which are in very strong linkage disequilibrium, are associated with a moderately increased incidence of invasive breast cancer.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Relationship between the TGFß1 haplotypes examined. A diagram showing the most parsimonious order of common mutational events in the human TGFß1 gene. The ancestral haplotype (top left) was determined from comparisons between species (18) . The frequencies shown are those estimated from the United Kingdom controls. A majority (96%) of all haplotypes observed does not require a recombination event to explain their existence. The haplotypes directly examined in the present study are each shown (left). Other known haplotypes, forming subgroups of the ones studies here (18) , are also shown (right). Promoter base changes and amino acid positions are numbered. Single letter amino acid codes are used.

 
As a consequence of the strong linkage disequilibrium between the C-509T and Leu10Pro SNPs, it is not easy to determine which is more likely to be the cause of the observed association. In an attempt to resolve this, we fitted logistic regression models in which we allowed for the effects of homozygosity at both C-509T and Leu10Pro, both individually and jointly. The model incorporating both SNPs did not fit significantly better than the model with Pro10Leu alone (P = 0.3), but there was weak evidence that the model with C-509T alone fitted less well than the joint model (P = 0.07).

TGFß1 Secretion.
The C-509T promoter polymorphism does not lie within a known regulatory sequence, and its role in transcription is therefore unclear. Furthermore, the above analysis suggested that that this polymorphism alone was unlikely to account for the observed associations. However, the Pro10Leu substitution in the signal peptide potentially affects secretion of the TGFß1 protein, and this was assayed in HeLa cells. The amounts of TGFß1 secreted in response to transfection with the CMV-P and CMV-L vectors as a function of time after transfection are shown in Fig. 2aCitation . The amount of TGFß1 secreted from CMV-P-transfected cells was consistently greater than from CMV-L-transfected cells, and for both forms, secretion was maximal by 12 h and constant to 18 h. The mean ratio of TGFß1 secreted when driven by the two constructs (CMV-P:CMV-L) was 2.4 ± 0.1 (range 2.1–2.7), and this ratio did not vary significantly over the 18-h time course. The decrease in rate of TGFß1 accumulation with time probably reflects the quiescent state of the cells induced by incubation for prolonged periods in DMEM after transfection.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Secretion of TGFß1 from HeLa cells transfected with CMV-P and CMV-L. In a, serum-free DMEM medium containing secreted TGFß1 was collected at the times indicated from HeLa cells that had been transfected with either the CMV-P ({bullet}) or CMV-L ({circ}) construct (no ß-gal) and was assayed for TGFß1 after activation, as described in "Materials and Methods." Data from a representative time course experiment (n = 3) are shown as the means ± SE for triplicate determinations of TGFß1, and the ratio for the amounts of TGFß1 secreted for the transfected constructs ({blacksquare}) is also shown. In b, serum-free medium was collected after 18 h and assayed for TGFß1 as in a from HeLa cells that had been transfected with CMV-P ± CMV-ß-gal, CMV-L ± CMV-ß-gal, CMV-P ± CMV-E, CMV-L ± CMV-E, or CMV-ß-gal + CMV-E. Data are means ± SE from triplicate determinations of TGFß1 in three separate experiments.

 
A series of experiments similar to those in Fig. 2aCitation was performed to compare amounts of TGFß1 secreted at 18 h after transfection with the CMV-P and CMV-L vectors and to determine whether cotransfections with CMV-E or CMV-ß-gal affected TGFß1 secretion. The data in Fig. 2bCitation show that in three separate experiments, neither CMV-E nor CMV-ß-gal significantly affected the amount of TGFß1 secreted in response to CMV-P or CMV-L. Furthermore, no significant differences in amounts of TGFß1 secreted in response to CMV-P or CMV-L (or in the ratios of secreted TGFß1) were observed using two separate preparations of the CMV-P and CMV-L vectors (data not shown). The addition of BSA (0.02%) to the incubation medium during transfection or to the incubation medium after transfection made no significant difference to the amounts of TGFß1 secreted. The absolute amounts of TGFß1 secreted varied significantly between independent transfection experiments, reflecting the efficiency of the transfections, but transfection efficiencies within experiments determined by ß-galacosidase assays did not vary significantly. The ratio of secreted Leu and Pro forms of TGFß1 for all experiments (n = 8) was 2.8 ± 0.2.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Breast Cancer Risks.
The moderately increased risk of breast cancer (1.2–1.3-fold) associated with TGFß1 T-509 or Pro10 homozygosity is comparable in magnitude to other recognized breast cancer risk factors, e.g., current use of oral contraceptives (1.24; 95% CI 1.15–1.33; Ref. 27 ) or hormone replacement therapy for >5 years (1.35; 95% CI 1.21–1.49; Ref. 28 ). In this study, the effect of the polymorphisms appears to be recessive, although the HDB series gives heterozygote ORs of similar magnitude to the rare homozygote risk (Table 3)Citation . As a recessive allele, Pro10 would contribute only 0.2% to the excess sibling risk of breast cancer, which is 1.8-fold in the population (see "Materials and Methods"). However, we estimate that 3% of all breast cancer cases may be attributable to Pro10 homozygosity, calculated as defined in "Materials and Methods."

Because Pro10 homozygotes only comprise 13% of the population, very large sample sizes are required to detect the modest risk associated with this genotype. Thus, the combined data from three series (a maximum of 3987 patients and 3867 controls) had >95% power to detect a relative risk of 1.5 at P < 0.001 but only ~50% power to detect a relative risk of 1.2 at P < 0.01. These estimates clearly illustrate the need for large sample sizes to identify moderate risk genotypes.

Ziv et al. (29) have recently evaluated the T +29C (Leu10Pro) polymorphism in a nested case-control study, based on 146 breast cancer cases from a cohort of 3075 women aged >65. In marked contrast to our study, Pro10 homozygosity was associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer (risk ratio 0.36; 95% CI 0.17–0.75). Our much larger study clearly excludes a reduced risk of this magnitude for the cases and controls studied (median age ~50 years; range 22–92 years). Comparing the two studies, we note that the cases in the cohort of Ziv et al. had, on average, a later age at diagnosis (median age: 70 years) and included 13% noninvasive cancers, which were specifically excluded from our study.

The data for association of the Leu10Pro polymorphism in TGFß1 with invasive breast cancer can be compared with the associations reported for several other diseases, e.g., Pro10 homozygosity is associated with a decrease in the rate of loss of bone density and a therapeutic response to vitamin D in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis, but is a risk factor for spinal osteophytosis (30) . Pro10 alleles are also associated with reduced incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (31) but with increased risk of systemic sclerosis (32) , asthma (33) , pulmonary dysfunction with cystic fibrosis (34) , and progression of liver fibrosis with chronic hepatitis virus C (35) . Pro10 homozygosity is associated with myocardial infarction in Japanese men (36) and Western patients with end stage dilated cardiomyopathy (37) but not with coronary artery disease (18) . Graft vascular disease after heart transplant is associated with Pro10 homozygosity (38) , whereas renal insufficiency after transplantation is reduced (39) . Reported associations of Pro10 alleles with higher systolic blood pressure depended on ethnicity and sex (40 , 41) .

Effect of the Variants on TGFß1 Secretion.
The Pro/Leu substitution in the signal peptide of TGFß1 has a substantial effect on protein secretion driven by the CMV promoter in the absence of any component of the TGFß1 promoter. These data therefore demonstrate that Pro10Leu alone has a functional effect in vitro independent of any effect of the C-509T promoter polymorphism. A significant effect of the Leu10Pro polymorphism on the amount of TGFß1 secreted in vivo may provide an explanation for its reported associations with a variety of diseases. We have reported previously that the amount of TGFß in serum is higher for Pro10 homozygotes than Leu10 homozygotes (42) , and other studies are consistent with this observation (36) . It is therefore plausible that local secretion of TGFß by breast tumors and/or local stromal cells is also higher for Pro10 homozygotes. As noted earlier, current theories for the effects of TGFß on tumor development are that increased amounts of TGFß1 activity may suppress the early stages of tumor formation but promote the invasiveness, metastasis, and angiogenesis of tumors. In the present study, cases with noninvasive breast cancer have been excluded, and therefore, we can conclude only that the Pro10 homozygotes have an increased incidence of invasive disease. Any effects of Pro10 homozygosity on the initiation of breast cancer remain to be determined.

It is of note that the antiestrogen tamoxifen is reported to cause increased TGFß accumulation in breast tumors (43 , 44) . The data presented therefore raise the clinically significant question of what effect the TGFß produced in response to tamoxifen may have on the invasive stages of breast tumor development.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank K. Redman, J. Gregory, and J. Lipscombe for case sample management and the EPIC management team (N. E. Day, K-T. Khaw, S. Oakes, S. Bingham, R. Luben, and J. Russell) for access to control DNA in the United Kingdom series.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by the Cancer Research United Kingdom and Kuopio University Hospital Eritgis Valtion Osuus Grant 5115. Strangeways Research Laboratory has received a United Kingdom National Lottery Award (MC004121). P. R. K. is a British Heart Foundation Basic Sciences Lecturer; B. A. J. P. is a Gibb Fellow of Cancer Research United Kingdom. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Cancer Research United Kingdom, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom. Back

3 A. M. D. and P. D. E. contributed equally to this work. Back

4 The abbreviations used are: TGF, transforming growth factor; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; ABC, Anglian Breast Cancer; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer; df, degrees of freedom; LAP, latency associated peptide; v/v, volume for volume; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Back

Received 8/12/02. Accepted 3/12/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Antoniou A. C., Pharoah P. D., McMullan G., Day N. E., Ponder B. A., Easton D. Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study. Genet. Epidemiol., 21: 1-18, 2001.[Medline]
  2. Antoniou A. C., Pharoah P. D., McMullan G., Day N. E., Stratton M. R., Peto J., Ponder B. J., Easton D. F. A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes. Br. J. Cancer, 86: 76-83, 2002.[Medline]
  3. Rosfjord E. C., Dickson R. B. Growth factors, apoptosis, and survival of mammary epithelial cells. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 4: 229-237, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Janda E., Lehmann K., Killisch I., Jechlinger M., Herzig M., Downward J., Beug H., Grunert S. Ras and TGFß cooperatively regulate epithelial cell plasticity and metastasis: dissection of Ras signaling pathways. J. Cell Biol., 156: 299-313, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lehmann K., Janda E., Pierreux C. E., Rytomaa M., Schulze A., McMahon M., Hill C. S., Beug H., Downward J. Raf induces TGFß production while blocking its apoptotic but not invasive responses: a mechanism leading to increased malignancy in epithelial cells. Genes Dev., 14: 2610-2622, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Oft M., Akhurst R. J., Balmain A. Metastasis is driven by sequential elevation of H-ras and Smad2 levels. Nat. Cell Biol., 4: 487-494, 2002.[Medline]
  7. Schulze A., Lehmann K., Jefferies H. B., McMahon M., Downward J. Analysis of the transcriptional program induced by Raf in epithelial cells. Genes Dev., 15: 981-994, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Goumans M. J., Valdimarsdottir G., Itoh S., Rosendahl A., Sideras P., ten Dijke P. Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors. EMBO J., 21: 1743-1753, 2002.[Medline]
  9. Wakefield L. M., Yang Y. A., Dukhanina O. Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer: lessons learned from genetically altered mouse models. Breast Cancer Res., 2: 100-106, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Derynck R., Akhurst R. J., Balmain A. TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nat. Genet., 29: 117-129, 2001.[Medline]
  11. Bartsch D., Hahn S. A., Danichevski K. D., Ramaswamy A., Bastian D., Galehdari H., Barth P., Schmiegel W., Simon B., Rothmund M. Mutations of the DPC4/Smad4 gene in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Oncogene, 18: 2367-2371, 1999.[Medline]
  12. Kleeff J., Ishiwata T., Maruyama H., Friess H., Truong P., Buchler M. W., Falb D., Korc M. The TGF-beta signaling inhibitor Smad7 enhances tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene, 18: 5363-5372, 1999.[Medline]
  13. Markowitz S. TGF-beta receptors and DNA repair genes, coupled targets in a pathway of human colon carcinogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1470: M13-M20, 2000.[Medline]
  14. Grady W. M., Myeroff L. L., Swinler S. E., Rajput A., Thiagalingam S., Lutterbaugh J. D., Neumann A., Brattain M. G., Chang J., Kim S. J., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., Willson J. K., Markowitz S. Mutational inactivation of transforming growth factor beta receptor type II in microsatellite stable colon cancers. Cancer Res., 59: 320-324, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lucke C. D., Philpott A., Metcalfe J. C., Thompson A. M., Hughes-Davies L., Kemp P. R., Hesketh R. Inhibiting mutations in the transforming growth factor beta type 2 receptor in recurrent human breast cancer. Cancer Res., 61: 482-485, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chen T., Carter D., Garrigue-Antar L., Reiss M. Transforming growth factor beta type I receptor kinase mutant associated with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 4805-4810, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Xie W., Mertens J. C., Reiss D. J., Rimm D. L., Camp R. L., Haffty B. G., Reiss M. Alterations of Smad signaling in human breast carcinoma are associated with poor outcome: a tissue microarray study. Cancer Res., 62: 497-505, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Syrris P., Carter N. D., Metcalfe J. C., Kemp P. R., Grainger D. J., Kaski J. C., Crossman D. C., Francis S. E., Gunn J., Jeffery S., Heathcote K. Transforming growth factor-beta1 gene polymorphisms and coronary artery disease. Clin. Sci. (Colch.), 95: 659-667, 1998.[Medline]
  19. Cambien F., Ricard S., Troesch A., Mallet C., Generenaz L., Evans A., Arveiler D., Luc G., Ruidavets J. B., Poirier O. Polymorphisms of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene in relation to myocardial infarction and blood pressure. The Etude Cas-Temoin de l’Infarctus du Myocarde (ECTIM) Study. Hypertension, 28: 881-887, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Br. J. Cancer, 83: 10301-10308, 2000.
  21. Day N., Oakes S., Luben R., Khaw K. T., Bingham S., Welch A., Wareham N. EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 80 (Suppl. 1): 95-103, 1999.
  22. Chang-Claude J., Eby N., Kiechle M., Bastert G., Becher H. Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk by age 50 among women in Germany. Cancer Causes Control, 11: 687-695, 2000.[Medline]
  23. Mitrunen K., Jourenkova N., Kataja V., Eskelinen M., Kosma V. M., Benhamou S., Kang D., Vainio H., Uusitupa M., Hirvonen A. Polymorphic catechol-O-methyltransferase gene and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 10: 635-640, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Breslow N. E., Day N. E. . Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. II, IARC Lyon, France 1980.
  25. Easton D. F., Peto J., Babiker A. G. Floating absolute risk: an alternative to relative risk in survival and case-control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group. Stat. Med., 10: 1025-1035, 1991.[Medline]
  26. Pharoah P. D., Day N. E., Duffy S., Easton D. F., Ponder B. A. Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer, 71: 800-809, 1997.[Medline]
  27. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet, 347: 1713-1727, 1996.[Medline]
  28. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet, 350: 1047-1059, 1997.[Medline]
  29. Ziv E., Cauley J., Morin P. A., Saiz R., Browner W. S. Association between the T29C polymorphism in the transforming growth factor beta1 gene and breast cancer among elderly white women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. JAMA, 285: 2859-2863, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yamada Y. Association of a Leu(10)–>Pro polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 with genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis and spinal osteoarthritis. Mech. Ageing Dev., 116: 113-123, 2000.[Medline]
  31. Sugiura Y., Niimi T., Sato S., Yoshinouchi T., Banno S., Naniwa T., Maeda H., Shimizu S., Ueda R. Transforming growth factor beta1 gene polymorphism in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 61: 826-828, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Crilly A., Hamilton J., Clark C. J., Jardine A., Madhok R. Analysis of transforming growth factor beta1 gene polymorphisms in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 61: 678-681, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pulleyn L. J., Newton R., Adcock I. M., Barnes P. J. TGFbeta1 allele association with asthma severity. Hum. Genet., 109: 623-627, 2001.[Medline]
  34. Arkwright P. D., Laurie S., Super M., Pravica V., Schwarz M. J., Webb A. K., Hutchinson I. V. TGF-beta(1) genotype and accelerated decline in lung function of patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax, 55: 459-462, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gewaltig J., Mangasser-Stephan K., Gartung C., Biesterfeld S., Gressner A. M. Association of polymorphisms of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with the rate of progression of HCV-induced liver fibrosis. Clin. Chim. Acta, 316: 83-94, 2002.[Medline]
  36. Yokota M., Ichihara S., Lin T. L., Nakashima N., Yamada Y. Association of a T29–>C polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction in Japanese. Circulation, 101: 2783-2787, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Holweg C. T., Baan C. C., Niesters H. G., Vantrimpont P. J., Mulder P. G., Maat A. P., Weimar W., Balk A. H. TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms in patients with end-stage heart failure. J. Heart Lung Transplant., 20: 979-984, 2001.[Medline]
  38. Holweg C. T., Baan C. C., Balk A. H., Niesters H. G., Maat A. P., Mulder P. M., Weimar W. The transforming growth factor-beta1 codon 10 gene polymorphism and accelerated graft vascular disease after clinical heart transplantation. Transplantation, 71: 1463-1467, 2001.[Medline]
  39. Lacha J., Hubacek J. A., Potmesil P., Viklicky O., Malek I., Vitko S. TGF-beta 1 gene polymorphism in heart transplant recipients–effect on renal function. Ann. Transplant., 6: 39-43, 2001.[Medline]
  40. Yamada Y., Fujisawa M., Ando F., Niino N., Tanaka M., Shimokata H. Association of a polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with blood pressure in Japanese individuals. J. Hum. Genet., 47: 243-248, 2002.[Medline]
  41. Rivera M. A., Echegaray M., Rankinen T., Perusse L., Rice T., Gagnon J., Leon A. S., Skinner J. S., Wilmore J. H., Rao D. C., Bouchard C. TGF-beta(1) gene-race interactions for resting and exercise blood pressure in the HERITAGE Family Study. J. Appl. Physiol., 91: 1808-1813, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Grainger D. J., Heathcote K., Chiano M., Snieder H., Kemp P. R., Metcalfe J. C., Carter N. D., Spector T. D. Genetic control of the circulating concentration of transforming growth factor type beta1. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 93-97, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. MacCallum J., Keen J. C., Bartlett J. M., Thompson A. M., Dixon J. M., Miller W. R. Changes in expression of transforming growth factor beta mRNA isoforms in patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 474-478, 1996.[Medline]
  44. Butta A., MacLennan K., Flanders K. C., Sacks N. P., Smith I., McKinna A., Dowsett M., Wakefield L. M., Sporn M. B., Baum M., et al Induction of transforming growth factor ß 1 in human breast cancer in vivo following tamoxifen treatment. Cancer Res., 52: 4261-4264, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
X. Yuan, Z. Liao, Z. Liu, L.-E Wang, S. L. Tucker, L. Mao, X. S. Wang, M. Martel, R. Komaki, J. D. Cox, et al.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism at rs1982073:T869C of the TGF{beta}1 Gene Is Associated With the Risk of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2009; 27(20): 3370 - 3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
J. Healy, M.-H. Roy-Gagnon, and D. Sinnett
No evidence for association between TGFB1 promoter SNPs and the risk of childhood pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia among French Canadians
Haematologica, July 1, 2009; 94(7): 1034 - 1035.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Sharma, B. A. Raby, G. M. Hunninghake, M. Soto-Quiros, L. Avila, A. J. Murphy, J. Lasky-Su, B. J. Klanderman, J. S. Sylvia, S. T. Weiss, et al.
Variants in TGFB1, Dust Mite Exposure, and Disease Severity in Children with Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2009; 179(5): 356 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
L. A. Bremer, S. M. Blackman, L. L. Vanscoy, K. E. McDougal, A. Bowers, K. M. Naughton, D. J. Cutler, and G. R. Cutting
Interaction between a novel TGFB1 haplotype and CFTR genotype is associated with improved lung function in cystic fibrosis
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 15, 2008; 17(14): 2228 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. S. Saltzman, J. F. Yamamoto, R. Decker, L. Yokochi, A. G. Theriault, T. M. Vogt, and L. Le Marchand
Association of Genetic Variation in the Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-1 Gene with Serum Levels and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia
Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 1236 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Thys, I. Schrauwen, K. Vanderstraeten, K. Janssens, N. Dieltjens, K. Van Den Bogaert, E. Fransen, W. Chen, M. Ealy, M. Claustres, et al.
The coding polymorphism T263I in TGF-{beta}1 is associated with otosclerosis in two independent populations
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2007; 16(17): 2021 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. I. Berndt, W.-Y. Huang, N. Chatterjee, M. Yeager, R. Welch, S. J. Chanock, J. L. Weissfeld, R. E. Schoen, and R. B. Hayes
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) gene polymorphisms and risk of advanced colorectal adenoma
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1965 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Kang, K.-M. Lee, S. K. Park, S. I. Berndt, D. Reding, N. Chatterjee, R. Welch, S. Chanock, W.-Y. Huang, and R. B. Hayes
Lack of Association of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Polymorphisms and Haplotypes with Prostate Cancer Risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1303 - 1305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. P. Purdue, Q. Lan, A. Kricker, A. E. Grulich, C. M. Vajdic, J. Turner, D. Whitby, S. Chanock, N. Rothman, and B. K. Armstrong
Polymorphisms in immune function genes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: findings from the New South Wales non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 704 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. P. Boyle
Strategies for Identifying Modifier Genes in Cystic Fibrosis
Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2007; 4(1): 52 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. M. Howell and M. J. Rose-Zerilli
Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms, Cancer Susceptibility, and Prognosis
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 194S - 199S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Sternlicht, A. M. Dunning, D. H. Moore, P. D.P. Pharoah, D. G. Ginzinger, K. Chin, J. W. Gray, F. M. Waldman, B. A.J. Ponder, and Z. Werb
Prognostic Value of PAI1 in Invasive Breast Cancer: Evidence That Tumor-Specific Factors Are More Important Than Genetic Variation in Regulating PAI1 Expression.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2107 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Kim and C. Lee
The Gene Encoding Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Confers Risk of Ischemic Stroke and Vascular Dementia
Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2843 - 2845.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
The Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 4, 2006; 98(19): 1382 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. S. Feigelson, A. V. Patel, W. R. Diver, V. L. Stevens, M. J. Thun, and E. E. Calle
Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Receptor Type I and Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Polymorphisms Are Not Associated with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1236 - 1237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-H. Mao, E. F. Saunier, J. P. de Koning, M. M. McKinnon, M. N. Higgins, K. Nicklas, H.-T. Yang, A. Balmain, and R. J. Akhurst
Genetic variants of Tgfb1 act as context-dependent modifiers of mouse skin tumor susceptibility
PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8125 - 8130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. M. Poole, J. Bigler, J. Whitton, J. G. Sibert, J. D. Potter, and C. M. Ulrich
Prostacyclin synthase and arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase polymorphisms and risk of colorectal polyps.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. A. Kay, I. R. Ellis, S. J. Jones, S. Perrier, M. M. Florence, A. M. Schor, and S. L. Schor
The Expression of Migration Stimulating Factor, a Potent Oncofetal Cytokine, Is Uniquely Controlled by 3'-Untranslated Region-Dependent Nuclear Sequestration of Its Precursor Messenger RNA
Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 65(23): 10742 - 10749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. L. Drumm, M. W. Konstan, M. D. Schluchter, A. Handler, R. Pace, F. Zou, M. Zariwala, D. Fargo, A. Xu, J. M. Dunn, et al.
Genetic Modifiers of Lung Disease in Cystic Fibrosis
N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 2005; 353(14): 1443 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
K. Janssens, P. ten Dijke, S. Janssens, and W. Van Hul
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 to the Bone
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 743 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D L Mattey, N Nixon, P T Dawes, and J Kerr
Association of polymorphism in the transforming growth factor {beta}1 gene with disease outcome and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2005; 64(8): 1190 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Shin, X.-O. Shu, Q. Cai, Y.-T. Gao, and W. Zheng
Genetic Polymorphisms of the Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Gene and Breast Cancer Risk: A Possible Dual Role at Different Cancer Stages
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1567 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
T Hamaguchi, S Okino, N Sodeyama, Y Itoh, A Takahashi, E Otomo, M Matsushita, H Mizusawa, and M Yamada
Association of a polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-{beta}1 gene with cerebral amyloid angiopathy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 76(5): 696 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. G. Kaklamani, L. Baddi, J. Liu, D. Rosman, S. Phukan, C. Bradley, C. Hegarty, B. McDaniel, A. Rademaker, C. Oddoux, et al.
Combined Genetic Assessment of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling Pathway Variants May Predict Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3454 - 3461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. Sparks, J. Bigler, J. G Sibert, J. D Potter, Y. Yasui, and C. M Ulrich
TGF{beta}1 polymorphism (L10P) and risk of colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Ewart-Toland, J. M. Chan, J. Yuan, A. Balmain, and J. Ma
A Gain of Function TGFB1 Polymorphism May Be Associated With Late Stage Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 759 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. L. Marchand, C. A. Haiman, D. van den Berg, L. R. Wilkens, L. N. Kolonel, and B. E. Henderson
T29C Polymorphism in the Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Gene and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 412 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
X.-O. Shu, Y.-T. Gao, Q. Cai, L. Pierce, H. Cai, Z.-X. Ruan, G. Yang, F. Jin, and W. Zheng
Genetic Polymorphisms in the TGF-{beta}1 Gene and Breast Cancer Survival: A Report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study
Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 64(3): 836 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Z. Li, T. Habuchi, N. Tsuchiya, K. Mitsumori, L. Wang, C. Ohyama, K. Sato, T. Kamoto, O. Ogawa, and T. Kato
Increased risk of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene polymorphism at codon10
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2004; 25(2): 237 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online