Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dirmeier, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dirmeier, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, W.
[Cancer Research 63, 2982-2989, June 1, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Latent Membrane Protein 1 Is Critical for Efficient Growth Transformation of Human B Cells by Epstein-Barr Virus1

Ulrike Dirmeier, Bernhard Neuhierl, Ellen Kilger, Gilbert Reisbach, Mark L. Sandberg and Wolfgang Hammerschmidt2

GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Department of Gene Vectors, D-81377 Munich, Germany [U. D., B. N., E. K., G. R., W. H.], and McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 [M. L. S.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is an integral membrane protein that acts like a constitutively activated receptor. LMP1 interacts with members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family, as well as with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated death domain, resulting in induction of nuclear factor-{kappa}B, the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, and the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activator protein 1-signaling cascade. The binding of Janus kinase 3 results in activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription. The domain structure of LMP1 has been mapped extensively, but the quantitative contribution of distinct LMP1 domains to the efficiency of B-cell proliferation by EBV has not been determined. On the basis of the maxi-EBV system, which allows us to introduce and study mutations in the context of the complete EBV genome, a panel of 10 EBV mutants with alterations in the LMP1 gene locus was established. The mutant EBVs were tested for their efficiency to induce and maintain proliferation of clonal B-cell lines in vitro. Surprisingly and with reduced frequency, EBV mutants which deleted LMP1’s COOH terminus, transmembrane domains, or the entire open reading frame were able to generate proliferating B-cell clones that were dependent on the presence of human fibroblast feeder cells. A B-cell clone carrying the LMP1-null mutant EBV genome was also analyzed for oncogenicity in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Our results demonstrate that LMP1 is critical but not mandatory for the generation of proliferating B cells in vitro. LMP1 functions greatly contribute to EBV’s transformation potential and appear essential for its oncogenicity in severe combined immunodeficiency mice.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
EBV is a human herpes virus identified as the first human tumor virus (1) . It is associated with human malignancies, including Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, among others. In vitro EBV predominantly infects resting primary human B-lymphocytes, which can acquire the characteristic of unlimited cell proliferation, giving rise to LCLs.3 This process partly reflects the pathogenetic mechanisms of tumor development. In growth-transformed B cells, only 11 of the 80 viral genes are expressed. Among them, 5 genes, the nuclear antigens EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA 3a and c, and the LMP1, are considered to be essential for cellular transformation (see Ref. 2 for a recent review). LMP1 is the only protein that is transforming in nonlymphoid cells, such as rodent fibroblasts (3, 4, 5) , and transgenic mice indicate that LMP1 is likely to be a main factor in EBV-associated lymphomas (6 , 7) . In B cells, LMP1 mimics the phenotypic effects of an activated CD40 receptor, which include sustained cell proliferation, expression of adhesion molecules, and secretion of antibodies (8, 9, 10) . In CD40 knockout mice, however, LMP1 only partially substitutes for CD40’s functions (10) .

LMP1 is an integral membrane protein composed of a short cytoplasmic NH2 terminus of 24 aa, six transmembrane spanning domains of 162 aa, and a cytoplasmic COOH terminus of 200 aa. It has been shown that LMP1 acts as a constitutively active pseudo receptor (11) . For LMP1’s ligand-independent activity, the six transmembrane domains are critical in mediating the spontaneous aggregation of the molecule in the plasma membrane (11, 12, 13) . The cytoplasmic NH2 terminus of LMP1 seems to be essential for the correct insertion of LMP1 in the plasma membrane, interacts with the cytoskeleton (14, 15, 16) , and helps to localize LMP1 in microdomains or rafts (Refs. 12 , 17 , and references therein), which are known to be hot spots for signal-transducing molecules. LMP1’s cytoplasmic COOH terminus interacts with TRADD (18 , 19) , as well as with members of the TRAF family (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) , indicating its role in signaling. Apart from NF-{kappa}B (26 , 27) , LMP1 induces the p38 MAPK (28 , 29) and JNK1/AP1 (19 , 30) pathways. Two subdomains of LMP1, called CTARs 1 and 2, are responsible for signal induction for both NF-{kappa}B and MAPK pathways and have been proposed to be critical for cellular transformation (4 , 18 , 26 , 31) . A third domain, CTAR3, located between CTAR 1 and CTAR 2, triggers the JAK3/STAT signaling cascade (32) . The role for CTAR3 is controversial (33 , 34) .

In the context of EBV, LMP1 is thought to be essential to induce and maintain cellular transformation of B cells in vitro based on genetic analyses, but it is still not obvious which domains of LMP1 are really critical, because most of the examined LMP1 mutants did not take LMP1’s fine structure into account (14 , 31 , 34, 35, 36, 37) . On the basis of the maxi-EBV system (38) , it is now feasible to assess the contributions of the different domains to the process of B-cell proliferation quantitatively. Toward this aim, a panel of EBV mutants with alterations within the LMP1 gene was established, and their effect on the in vitro frequency of B-cell growth transformation was measured clonally. To our surprise, even a mutant EBV lacking the entire LMP1 gene was capable of fostering proliferation of B-cell clones, although at dramatically reduced frequency and only in the presence of irradiated fibroblast feeder cells. This particular mutant was also analyzed for its oncogenicity in the SCID mouse model (Ref. 39 for a review). Our data indicate that LMP1’s functions contribute markedly to B-cell proliferation and are essential for EBV’s oncogenic potential in SCID mice.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cells.
The 293 cell line is a human embryonic epithelial kidney cell line; Raji is an EBV-positive human Burkitt’s cell line. B95.8 is an EBV-positive lymphoblastoid marmoset B-cell line. 721 is a human B-cell line immortalized with the B95.8 strain of EBV. WI38 are primary human fibroblasts obtained from American Type Culture Collection. The cell lines are described as well as the purification of primary B lymphocytes from adenoids or umbilical cord blood (40 , 41) .

Recombinant Maxi-EBV Plasmids.
LMP1 mutations (Table 1)Citation were introduced into the plasmid p2167.1 (Fig. 1A)Citation . This plasmid also carries the selection marker for kanamycin phosphotransferase in between the BALF1 gene and the promoter of LMP2A. Derivatives of p2167.1 with the different LMP1 mutant alleles served as shuttle constructs to introduce the mutations into the context of the maxi-EBV plasmid p2089. In p2167.1, all LMP1 mutants are under the control of the LMP1 wild-type promoter. Detailed cloning strategies and information about intermediate plasmids are available on request. All LMP1 mutant plasmids were carefully checked for composition, and relevant sections were sequenced.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 LMP1 mutants

Overview of the LMP1 mutants in different maxi-EBVs, details of the individual mutations, and their expected phenotype deduced from published data and number of "green Raji units" needed to establish a single proliferating B cell clone.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Construction of mutant LMP1 alleles. In A, plasmid map of the shuttle plasmid p2167.1 encompasses B95.8 sequences as indicated. Immediately downstream of BALF1, a pCP15 fragment carrying the gene for kanamycin resistance was introduced. The complete LMP2A promoter was reconstructed by insertion of a fragment downstream of the pCP15 insert. Additionally shown are the genes for BARF1 and BALF2, exons of LMP2A or B, the terminal repeats (TR), and the promoters for LMP1, EDL1A (lytic LMP1 promoter), and LMP2A. In B, the diagram shows the E. coli strain DH10B carrying a chloramphenicol-resistant maxi-EBV plasmid and the ampicillin-resistant plasmid p2650 with a temperature-sensitive replication origin (ts) encoding RecA and the exonucleaseV inhibitor Red{gamma} to facilitate homologous recombination and transformation with linear DNA fragments. The DNA fragment representing a linearized derivative of p2167.1 contains the LMP1 mutation flanked by two homologous regions A and B and the marker kanamycin resistance (kana). After transformation of this fragment into competent E. coli cells and homologous recombination, colonies were selected in the presence of chloramphenicol and kanamycin at 42°C.

 
Generation of Mutant Maxi-EBV Plasmids.
The linearized fragments obtained from the p2167.1 derivatives were transformed into Escherichia coli DH10B, as illustrated in Fig. 1BCitation . For double selection of recombinant plasmids, 30 µg/ml chloramphenicol and 30 µg/ml kanamycin were used. Mutant maxi-EBV plasmids were used to establish virus-producing 293 cell lines as described (42) .

Production of Infectious Particles.
293 cell clones carrying different maxi-EBV plasmids were transfected with expression plasmids for BZLF1 (43) , BALF4 (42) , and histone acetyl transferase p300 to induce the lytic cycle. At 72-h postinfection, supernatants were harvested and filtered through 1.2-µm pore size filters.

Quantitation of Virus Titers and Infection of Primary B Cells.
The different virus stocks were quantitated via GFP expression of Raji cells infected with defined amounts of the virus stocks to be analyzed. Raji cells (3 x 105) were incubated at 37°C in 24-well cluster plates and cultivated for 3 days to allow expression of GFP. Infected Raji cells remain latently infected and do not express lytic genes, such as gp350/220 (42) , indicating that no progeny virus is released under these conditions.4 After 3 days, the percentage of GFP-positive cells was determined by UV microscopy. On the basis of these data, "green Raji units" per ml were calculated as a measure of the concentration of infectious maxi-EBV particles in different virus stocks. Primary human B lymphocytes, purified from adenoids or umbilical cord blood (41) , were infected with different dilutions of the adjusted virus stocks. In combination with {gamma}-irradiated WI38 fibroblasts as feeder layer, 1 x 105 B cells were plated in a volume of 100 µl/well in a 96-well cluster plate and fed once a week. After 4–6 weeks, the percentage of proliferating cell clones was determined, and several clones were expanded in suspension. As an alternative method, B cells were cultivated in soft agar after infection with the adjusted virus stocks as described (44) .

Western Blot Analysis and Immunostaining.
Proteins were extracted and analyzed as described (22) . Antibodies directed against LMP1’s COOH terminus (CS1–4; DAKO), LMP1’s NH2 terminus (OT22CN), and EBNA2 were used for detection. Immunoblots were developed using peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (Promega) and ECL reagent (Amersham-Pharmacia). Immunostainings with a monoclonal antibody directed against gp350 was done as described previously (40) .

Mice.
Eight-week-old SCID mice (Fox Chase) were injected i.p. with 3 x 106, 3 x 107, or 1 x 108 cells for each LCL. Mice were sacrificed when clinical signs of illness were observed.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Generation of Recombinant EBVs.
The complete genome of the B95.8 strain of EBV was cloned onto a mini F plasmid that also carries expression cassettes for GFP and hygromycin phosphotransferase as phenotypic markers for eukaryotic cells and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase for selection in E. coli (38) . This plasmid called maxi-EBV plasmid or p2089 (virion particles derived from p2089 are termed 2089) allows the introduction of any mutation in E. coli by a procedure outlined in detail in Fig. 1Citation .

We generated 10 LMP1 mutant alleles in the context of the maxi-EBV plasmid p2089. Conventionally engineered derivatives of the shuttle plasmid p2167.1 (Fig. 1A)Citation were constructed, each carrying a specific LMP1 mutant (Table 1)Citation under the control of LMP1’s own promoter. Linear fragments of the p2167.1 derivatives were introduced into the wild-type p2089 maxi-EBV plasmid via homologous recombination in E. coli (Fig. 1)Citation . After recombination, the resulting maxi-EBV plasmid DNA was isolated and checked by restriction analyses, Southern blot hybridizations, and partial DNA sequencing. Virus production of maxi-EBVs is based on 293 cells that stably carry the mutant maxi-EBV genome. To this end, the maxi-EBV plasmid DNAs were prepared from E. coli and transfected into 293 cells, and hygromycin-resistant and GFP-positive single cell clones were selected and expanded as described (38 , 40 , 42 , 45) . To confirm the identity and correct genotype of the maxi-EBV-carrying cell lines, total cellular DNA was analyzed by Southern blot hybridizations with appropriate probes (data not shown). For each maxi-EBV mutant, several single cell clones were tested for their ability to support the lytic cycle of EBV. The cell clones were transiently transfected with expression plasmids encoding the genes and transactivators BZLF1, BALF4, and p300. Although BZLF1 acts as the molecular switch to promote the onset of EBV’s lytic cycle (Ref. 2 for a review), p300 improves the inducibility of the lytic mode,5 and concomitant BALF4 expression markedly augments virus production (45) . Three days after transfection, the supernatants were used for infection of the human B-cell line Raji to determine the number of infectious viral particles. Because these cells become only latently infected and have not been observed to release progeny virus on superinfection with maxi-EBVs (data not shown), GFP-positive Raji cells allow direct assessment of the concentration of infectious EBVs. This information was used to adjust the virus stocks such that identical numbers of infectious maxi-EBV particles could be used for subsequent infection of primary human B cells.

LMP1 Mutant Alleles Promote Proliferation of Primary Human B Cells.
To identify domains of LMP1 critical for EBV’s growth transforming potential, 10 EBV mutants in LMP1 were established (Table 1)Citation . The mutations or deletions in the COOH terminus of LMP1 were expected to affect the induction of the NF-{kappa}B, MAPK/ATF, p38, JNK/AP1, and JAK3/STAT signaling pathways, and the complete deletion of the COOH terminus should result in LMP1’s failure to signal. Two NH2-terminal LMP1 mutants were included to determine the contribution of a number of proline residues within a potential SH3 motif in this domain of LMP1. Because LMP1 and CD40 are known to share analogous functions, we were curious to learn if a constitutive CD40 signal could replace LMP1’s contribution to cellular proliferation; this possibility was assessed by the LMP1:CD40 chimeric molecule (11) . During the early phase of EBV infection, an additional, truncated form of LMP1 (aa 129–386) is expressed, termed "lytic" LMP1, that might compete with signaling of full-length LMP1 as proposed (46) . To evaluate the role of lytic LMP1, the promoter of the lytic LMP1 was deleted. A drastic alteration of LMP1 is the deletion of its entire transmembrane domain, resulting in a cytoplasmic location of the truncated LMP1 gene product (47) . This {Delta}TM-LMP1 mutant should be nonfunctional because LMP1’s localization and oligomerization in the membrane is expected to be essential for the activity of the molecule (11 , 12) . Finally, a complete deletion of the entire coding region of LMP1 was introduced, resulting in the maxi-EBV {Delta}LMP1.

Infection of primary B lymphocytes with EBV results in so-called growth-transformed B-cell lines. This process has been shown to follow one-hit kinetics (44) , indicating that one biologically active EBV particle is sufficient to yield a single growth-transformed B-cell clone 4–6 weeks after infection of resting primary B lymphocytes (44 , 48) . Infection of primary B cells does not yield infectious progeny virus but results in a robust and latent viral infection in the growth-transformed cells (Ref. 2 and references therein), whereas uninfected primary B lymphocytes die within days in cell culture. Therefore, the efficiency of growth transformation of primary B cells is not perturbed by progeny virus multiplying and spreading in the assay, giving rise to multiple rounds of infection.

Dilutions of the adjusted virus stocks of wild-type 2089 and mutant maxi-EBVs were used for infection of primary human B cells in 96-well plates on irradiated human fibroblast feeder cell layers as described (48 , 49) . Fibroblast feeder cells were used to improve the clonal expansion of EBV-infected B cells as described (Ref. 44 and references therein). Potential virus production in primary B lymphocytes infected with the different virus stocks was analyzed by immunostaining for gp350/220 several days after infection. Expression of the glycoprotein gp350/220, a structural component of the EBV particle, would be indicative of the completion of the lytic productive phase of EBV’s life cycle (2 , 42) . No gp350/220 protein could be detected as expected (data not shown).

Infection of primary B lymphocytes with wild-type EBV results in the outgrowth of proliferating B cells. After 6 weeks, the ratio between the number of wells containing proliferating B-cell clones and wells without proliferating cells was determined with virus dilutions, which met the statistical requirements of one-hit kinetics (50) . In addition, similar experiments were performed in which infected B cells were cultivated in soft agarose with feeder cell layers (44 , 48) . The results were calculated as the number of virus particles needed to establish a single proliferating B-cell clone 6 weeks after B-cell infection expressed as "green Raji units" per cell clone (Table 1)Citation . Alternatively, the number of green Raji units required for the wild-type maxi-EBV 2089 was set to 100%, and the ratio of a particular mutant to yield a proliferating B-cell clone in relation to wild-type 2089 EBV was expressed as "efficiency percentage of growth transformation in the presence of feeder cells" (Fig. 2)Citation . To exclude any background problems, only experiments were included in this study in which mock-infected B-cell preparations were free of contaminating EBV field strains after 6 weeks of cultivation.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Transformation efficiency of LMP1 mutant alleles. The efficiencies of inducing long-term B-cell proliferation in the presence of human WI38 fibroblast feeder cells of the 10 different maxi-EBVs based on the number of "green Raji units" (Table 1)Citation were normalized to the wild-type maxi-EBV 2089, which was set to 100%. The data correspond to the mean values of at least three independent experiments and provide SD as indicated. For experiments with the mutant {Delta}LMP1 and {Delta}TM-LMP1 maxi-EBVs, the SD was ±0.37 and ±0.16, respectively. Mock-infected B cells (w/o EBV) did not yield any growth-transformed cells.

 
Unexpectedly, all LMP1 mutant EBVs gave rise to proliferating B-cell clones 6 weeks after infection, although with very different frequencies (Fig. 2)Citation . The first group of mutants showed an efficiency comparable with maxi-EBV 2089 encoding wild-type LMP1. To this group belonged one of the NH2-terminal mutants (P12-15-16-19-20A-LMP1), the deletion of the lytic LMP1 gene ({Delta}lytic LMP1), and the 33-bp repeat deleted LMP1 ({Delta}JAK3-LMP1). The second NH2-terminal mutant (P9-10-15A-LMP1) and LMP1:CD40 chimera were slightly compromised in comparison with 2089 wild-type stocks and showed ~50% reduction. The two COOH-terminal mutants {Delta}PxQxT-LMP1 and Y384G-LMP1 were more affected and showed a reduced efficiency of 13.9 and 9.7%, respectively. The mutant virus {Delta}C-LMP1, the mutant lacking the entire transmembrane region of the LMP1 gene ({Delta}TM-LMP1), and the complete LMP1 knockout ({Delta}LMP1) were severely affected. They showed an impaired efficiency of cellular transformation between 4.1 and 0.55% in contrast to 2089 maxi-EBV, e.g., <=100-fold more maxi-EBV particles were needed to yield a single proliferating B-cell clone with the maxi-EBV {Delta}LMP1. The {Delta}TM-LMP1 maxi-EBV mutant was affected the most because its growth transformation potential was consistently lower than maxi-EBV {Delta}LMP1.

LMP1 Mutant B-cell Lines.
About 20 proliferating B-cell clones of each of the 10 mutant EBVs obtained from infections of primary B cells were expanded and cultivated further for detailed analysis. According to the conditions of end point dilution, the majority of these proliferating B-cell cultures was monoclonal. All proliferating clones could be expanded in the absence of irradiated fibroblast feeder cells with the exception of B cells infected with EBV mutants {Delta}C-LMP1, {Delta}LMP1, and {Delta}T-LMP1, which could only be expanded successfully in the presence of fibroblast feeders cells. Under those conditions, even these B-cell lines could be cultivated for <=8 months postinfection equal to ~40–60 population doublings. They could be frozen viably, thawed, and cultivated further without any noticeable problems.

To characterize all expanded B-cell lines, the clonal identity of the proliferating B cells and integrity of the maxi-EBV DNA were carefully assessed. Cellular DNAs of all these B-cell clones of each mutant EBV were analyzed by Southern blot analysis, and the mutated LMP1 loci were PCR amplified and investigated via restriction analysis and DNA sequencing (data not shown). The expression of mutant LMP1 proteins in the expanded B-cell clones was analyzed by Western blot detection with various antibodies (examples are depicted in Fig. 3Citation ). All mutant LMP1 proteins that could be easily detected by antibodies directed against LMP1’s COOH terminus showed the expected migration pattern, and their expression levels are in the range of wild-type LMP1 (Fig. 3A)Citation . The {Delta}C-LMP1 protein could be detected via its His-tag (data not shown) or a LMP1 antibody directed against LMP1’s NH2 terminus; its expression appeared to be heavily up-regulated (Fig. 3B)Citation . The LMP1 mutant protein in proliferating B-cell clones obtained with {Delta}JAK3-LMP1 or the LMP1:CD40 maxi-EBVs could not be detected by the NH2 terminus-specific antibody, nor was it possible to visualize the proteins with antibodies directed against the COOH terminus of LMP1 or CD40. In those cases, Southern blot analysis of cellular DNAs and sequencing of the LMP1 loci in the B-cell cultures were compatible with the correct expression of the LMP1 mutant proteins. As expected, we failed to detect any LMP1 protein in B-cell clones infected with maxi-EBV {Delta}LMP1 lacking the complete LMP1 gene. All B-cell lines obtained with this particular maxi-EBV were EBV positive by Southern blot analysis (data not shown) and expressed EBNA2, excluding a putative contamination with LCLs expressing wild-type LMP1 (Fig. 3C)Citation . These results suggested that even a mutant EBV lacking LMP1 entirely is capable to induce B-cell proliferation in the presence of fibroblast feeder cells, although with reduced efficiency.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Detection of mutant LMP1 proteins in EBV-infected and proliferating B cells. By Western blot immunostaining, expression levels and migration patterns of different LMP1 mutants in individual proliferating B-cell clones were analyzed. In A, the expression of mutant LMP1 proteins was detected by a mixture of monoclonal antibodies directed against LMP1’s COOH terminus ({alpha}LMP1 CS1–4) and as an internal control with an EBNA2-specific antibody. The LCL-labeled "wtLMP1 (2089)" was obtained with the maxi-EBV 2089, whereas the immortalized B-cell line 721 resulted from infection with B95.8 virus. Both cell lines express wild-type LMP1 at the same level, indicating that 2089 maxi-EBV adequately reflects the situation of B95.8-immortalized B cells. In B, because {Delta}C-LMP1 cannot be recognized by the COOH-terminal LMP1 antibody, this mutant was detected via the antibody OT22CN directed against LMP1’s NH2 terminus. Because the {Delta}C-LMP1 protein in proliferating B cells infected with the {Delta}C-LMP1 maxi-EBV seems to be expressed at a very high level, it could be easily detected by the NH2-terminal antibody. In C, five B-cell clones obtained after infection with the {Delta}LMP1 maxi EBV were analyzed for expression of EBNA2 and LMP1 by Western blot. As expected, no LMP1 could be detected in these five cell lines, but EBNA2 was readily present.

 
The phenotypes of many different B-cell clones containing wild-type or mutant LMP1 maxi EBVs were analyzed further by FACS analyses for different surface markers, such as IgG, IgM, intercellular adhesion molecule, CD11a, CD69, CD80, CD83, and others. Unexpectedly, single cell clones differed remarkably in their expression levels when infected with wild-type maxi-EBV 2089 (data not shown), even when obtained from one donor. A similar range of heterogeneity was observed with cell clones infected with LMP1 mutant EBVs, which was therefore not informative. The growth-transformed B cells infected with wild-type or mutant maxi-EBVs adhered tightly to fibroblast feeder cells and, in general, showed an appreciable self-aggregation when cultivated on plastic, only. B cells infected with LMP1 mutant EBVs, which were hardly affected in terms of their growth-transforming potentials as shown in Fig. 2Citation , had a tendency to form bigger clumps similar to B cells infected with wild-type EBV 2089. The doubling time was much prolonged <=4 days with the EBV mutants {Delta}C-LMP1, {Delta}TM-LMP1, and {Delta}LMP1, in contrast to cells infected with wild-type EBV, which showed an estimated doubling time of ~24–30 h in general (data not shown).

The Oncogenic Potential of {Delta}LMP1 EBV-infected B Cells in Vivo.
Human B cells infected with EBV cause lymphoproliferative malignancies in SCID mice (39) . Because LMP1 is known as one of the most important mediators of B-cell transformation, it was quite surprising that we obtained proliferating B cells lacking LMP1 in our in vitro experiments. To investigate the oncogenic potential of these cell lines in vivo, experiments in SCID mice were done. Two groups of mice were injected i.p. with proliferating B cells derived from the same human donor, one group with B cells obtained with 2089, the second group with proliferating B cells obtained with {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV. Up to 1 x 108 cells were injected i.p. per animal (Fig. 4)Citation . With only one exception, all mice injected with B cells with 2089 wild-type EBV developed malignancies during the first 28 days (Fig. 4)Citation . Animal survival correlated with the number of injected cells as expected. Up to 50% of blood cells could be identified as of human origin in some of the mice injected with 2089-infected human B cells, and it was also possible to reestablish the injected B cells from tumors present primarily in liver, kidney, and spleen. The second group of mice injected with <=1 x 108 B cells obtained with {Delta}LMP1 EBV stayed healthy for 100 days, and no tumors were detectable (Fig. 4)Citation . This result impressively demonstrated the importance of LMP1 for in vivo oncogenesis by EBV-positive, growth-transformed B-cell lines.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Survival of SCID mice after injection of 2089 maxi-EBV and {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV growth-transformed B cells. Two B-cell lines, one obtained after infection with 2089 maxi-EBV, the other with {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV from the same donor, were analyzed. With one exception, all nine animals injected i.p. with 2089 maxi-EBV LCL (groups A–C) developed malignancies within a month. There was a strong dependency between time of death and number of cells received. One mouse in group A, which had received 3 x 106 cells, survived. In contrast, all animals injected with {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV B-cell clone (groups D–F) remained healthy without any detectable tumor within the observation period of 100 days. Each group consisted of three mice and received different numbers of cells as indicated. One animal in group A had to be sacrificed because of a spontaneous thymoma.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LMP1 was proposed to be essential for cellular transformation of human B cells in vitro (35) . Our experiments unexpectedly indicate that LMP1 is critical but not mandatory for the process of B-cell proliferation under certain circumstances, such as high virus titers and cocultivation in the presence of human fibroblast feeder cells. We established a panel of EBV mutants in LMP1 based on the maxi-EBV system. With this system in hand, it is possible to generate genetically defined, pure EBV virion stocks with concentrations between 5 x 104 and 1 x 105 infectious particles/ml. For the first time, this approach made it possible to investigate the contribution quantitatively of different LMP1 regions to the process of B-cell proliferation in vitro.

Our experiments indicate the existence of different stages of growth-transformed B cells. To clarify these different stages, we would like to introduce a new terminology. Infection of human primary B cells with EBV results in ~3–10% of the cells proliferating as so-called LCLs (51 , 52) . In general, such proliferating B cells have been considered to have an indefinite life span (for a review, see Ref. 2 ). We propose to use the term "phenotype 1" to characterize such cell lines capable of indefinite proliferation in standard growth medium. However, recent data suggest that within a range of 30–150 population doublings, LCLs derived from normal human donor B cells cease to proliferate and die (53) . We propose to introduce the term "phenotype 2" to characterize those cells which can be cultivated on plastic in standard growth medium with a finite life span in vitro. Only one of four LCLs become immortal after proliferative crisis and continue to proliferate indefinitely to yield phenotype 1 cell lines, a phenomenon which seems to correlate with telomerase expression (53 , 54) . We now observe a third phenotype of growth-transformed B cells, which is consistent with sustained B-cell proliferation in the presence of human fibroblast feeder cells, only. This remarkable "phenotype 3" clearly differs from growth-transformed phenotype 2 B cells and primary human B cells that are infected with, e.g., an EBV strain lacking EBNA2. The {Delta}EBNA2 mutant EBV is incapable to induce or maintain B-cell proliferation even when the infected cells were plated on human fibroblast feeder layers under identical conditions (55) . This phenotype is not surprising because {Delta}EBNA2 EBV is essentially null for other critical transforming genes, including EBNA-LP, EBNA3A, EBNA3C, and LMP1, because these are EBNA2 transactivated genes. However, EBV mutants singly deficient for either EBNA3A (48 , 56) , EBNA3C (Ref. 56 ) (data to be published), or EBNA-LP (data to be published) are equally impaired. It is interesting to note that previous studies have also shown characteristics of phenotype 3-transformed B cells. Primary B cells infected with an EBV mutant lacking the two Y1 and Y2 exons of EBNA-LP (55) and a particular LMP1 mutant EBV (36) at low multiplicity of infection (37) are similarly dependent on human fibroblast feeder cells for continued proliferation in vitro, supporting the characteristics of phenotype 3 growth-transformed B cells by EBV.

Infection of primary human B lymphocytes with EBV in the presence of {gamma}-irradiated human embryo fibroblasts as feeder cells is used as a standard procedure by us et al. (36 , 37 , 44 , 48 , 49 , 55) and does considerably increase the efficiency of clonal outgrowth of proliferating B cells (Ref. 44 and references therein). The effect of this feeder monolayer is mostly mediated by unidentified soluble factors; a direct cell-to-cell contact is not essential to mediate this effect (Ref. 44 and data not shown). Once established, the majority of the proliferating B cells that were generated with the different maxi-EBVs during this study was capable of proliferating in the absence of feeder cells for months. There were three exceptions, however, which turned out to be absolutely dependent on the presence of feeder cells (or conditioned medium; data not shown) for their continued proliferation in vitro. B cells derived from maxi-EBV stocks with the mutants {Delta}C-LMP1, {Delta}LMP1, and {Delta}TM-LMP1 required feeder cells for sustained proliferation. Those three EBV mutants also showed a very reduced efficiency of B-cell transformation of 4.1, 1.2, and 0.55%, compared with proliferating B cells established with wild-type maxi-EBV 2089 (Fig. 2)Citation . In the presence of irradiated fibroblast feeder cells, B cells infected with these mutant EBVs could be expanded for ~40–60 population doublings and maintained routinely for months, indicative of phenotype 3 growth-transformed B cells. To assess the oncogenic potential of a B-cell clone infected with {Delta}-LMP1 EBV in SCID mice, >109 cells were needed for the injections (Fig. 4)Citation . In the absence of feeder cells, these B-cell clones arrested in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle and slowly died off after a resting period of 2 weeks (data to be published). This observation indicated that LMP1 directly or indirectly by paracrine effects contributes to cellular proliferation. Obviously, this requirement can be trans-complemented by external stimuli, such as feeder cells or conditioned medium. It thus appears that the microenvironment even under in vitro cell culture conditions affects proliferation. Feeder cells in an in vitro situation might be functionally reminiscent of the stroma of germinal centers or play a similar role as lymph node stroma may do for the initiation of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

The fact that some of our EBV mutants support proliferation of B cells is in apparent conflict with previous observations (14 , 31 , 35) . However, we now know that high titer virus stocks are crucial to study EBV mutants that are severely crippled functionally. The efficiency of B-cell transformation is very much reduced with maxi-EBV mutants, such as {Delta}C-LMP1, {Delta}TM-LMP1, and {Delta}LMP1, and <=100-fold more viral particles were required to establish a proliferating single cell B-cell clone compared with wild-type EBV. It is likely that those conditions could not be met in previous studies. It is interesting to note that proliferating B-cell lines that needed <=100 times more infectious units than wild-type EBV to induce and maintain B-cell proliferation neither retained high copy numbers of EBV genomic DNA (data not shown) nor expressed high levels of viral genes, such as EBNA2 (Fig. 3C)Citation or other genes (data not shown). We favor the explanation that the multiple mutant virions bring information required early in infection to promote the initiation of proliferation because high levels of viral gene expression are not found in those cells that do proliferate after infection with the mutant viruses. Other interpretations of this intriguing finding are possible, too. Very obviously, the clonal transformation of B cells by EBV is affected by mutations within LMP1. Such mutations appear to affect EBV’s ability to contribute to the induction and maintenance of cellular proliferation. These events are a necessary prelude to the infected cells ever yielding immortalized progeny.

A number of publications deal with alterations in LMP1’s short NH2 terminus. Such mutations alter the half-life of the LMP1 protein among other effects, such as reduced NF-{kappa}B activation, membrane localization (15 , 26 , 27 , 57 , 58) , transformation (35 , 47 , 59) , and cytostatic effects (60) . We found that two mutations in this part of LMP1 that alter the putative SH3 domain (61) do not (P12–15-16–19-20A-LMP1) or only marginally (P9–10-15A-LMP1) affect EBV-mediated B-cell growth transformation. Several reports focus on the role of LMP1’s COOH-terminal domains in terms of signaling and B-cell transformation. The first 45 aa of the COOH terminus (aa 187–231) known as CTAR1 contains the consensus TRAF-binding motif PxQxT. This region of LMP1 accounts for ~25% of LMP1’s NF-{kappa}B activity (23 , 26 , 27 , 62) and was proposed to be essential and sufficient for B-cell proliferation when a COOH-terminally truncated LMP1 was investigated (36 , 37) . A deletion of the CTAR1 motif within the context of full-length LMP1 caused a loss of the immortalizing phenotype (31) in contrast to the discrete mutation of the PxQxT motif in this study, which reduced the efficiency of B-cell transformation to ~14%. LCLs established with the maxi-EBV {Delta}PxQxT-LMP1 could be grown in culture over months in the absence of feeder cells without any noticeable problems.

The proposed JAK3-binding domain in CTAR3 (32) seemed to play no role in the generation of proliferating B-cell clones (18 , 63) , which was confirmed by our experiments with the maxi-EBV deletion mutant {Delta}JAK3-LMP1. This finding could mean that the JAK3 interaction domain mapped previously within LMP1’s COOH terminus consists of nonconsecutive motifs (Refs. 33 and 34 and data not shown), which might explain the lack of a phenotype of this particular maxi-EBV. Very similar to our findings, JAK3 signaling does not appear to be critical in CD40-mediated B-cell proliferation and other well-known CD40-induced phenotypes (64) . The LMP1:CD40 maxi-EBV showed a slightly reduced transformation efficiency, indicating an adequate complementation of LMP1 functions. This phenotypic finding is very much in line with previous reports, suggesting LMP1’s mimicry of an activated CD40 molecule (9, 10, 11) .

Within LMP1’s COOH terminus, the region between aa 374 and 384 accounts for ~75% of the NF-{kappa}B activity induced by LMP1 (13 , 26) . This region was shown to bind TRADD (18 , 19) , which, together with TRAF2 and TRAF6, mediates induction of NF-{kappa}B and the p38 MAPK pathways (18 , 19 , 22 , 28) . JNK1/AP1 is also induced via this region, but the signal mediators are less clear (19 , 30 , 65) . In this study, a single point mutation in Y384G-LMP1 maxi-EBV reduced the efficiency of cellular transformation to ~10%. We were able to cultivate several cell clones derived from maxi-EBV Y384G-LMP1 stocks from dilutions that met conditions of single-hit kinetics. Although initial conditions in micro-titer plates always included a fibroblast feeder, Y384G-LCL-clones could be easily expanded 6 weeks after infection of the primary cells and cultivated for months without feeder cells in contrast to earlier publications (31 , 36 , 37) .

The {Delta}TM-LMP1 maxi-EBV disclosed a cellular transformation frequency that was consistently lower than the complete knockout in {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV, suggesting a dominant negative function. Immunoblots demonstrated a steady-state level of the mutated LMP1 protein that was comparable with wild-type LMP1 (Fig. 3A)Citation . In contrast, a dramatic overexpression of the {Delta}C-LMP1 mutant was noticed (Fig. 3BCitation and data not shown). This effect might stem from the deletion of the complete COOH terminus, causing a drastic alteration of the whole molecule (12 , 60) .

The fact that even a mutant EBV lacking the entire LMP1 gene could induce and maintain proliferating B-cell clones in vitro was quite unexpected. Proliferating B-cell clones derived from infection with the {Delta}LMP1 maxi-EBV mutant were compared with LCLs derived from the same donor established with wild-type maxi-EBV 2089 in the SCID mouse model. Our results indicated, and are in line with data obtained in transgenic mice (6 , 7 , 10) , that LMP1 functions not only improve the efficiency of B-cell proliferation but are also essential for EBV’s oncogenicity in SCID mice.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank A. Kieser and B. Sugden for their comments on this manuscript. We also thank J. Middeldorp for the monoclonal antibody OT22CN and E. Kremmer for her gift of other monoclonal antibodies, W. Wackernagel for the plasmid pCP15, and O. Gires for the supply with adenoid samples.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB455, additional grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Public Health Service Grants CA70723 and CA22443, and by institutional grants. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Phone: 49-89-7099-506; Fax: 49-89-7099-225. E-mail: hammerschmidt{at}gsf.de Back

3 The abbreviations used are: LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line; LMP1, latent membrane protein 1; NF-{kappa}B, nuclear factor-{kappa}B; TRADD, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated death domain; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; JAK, Janus kinase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; CTAR, COOH-terminal activator region; AP, activator protein; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; ATF, activating transcription factor; TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; aa, amino acid; SH3, Src homology 3. Back

4 U. Dirmeier, B. Neuhierl, E. Kilger, G. Reisbach, M. L. Sandberg, and W. Hammerschmidt, unpublished data. Back

5 U. Dirmeier, B. Neuhierl, E. Kilger, G. Reisbach, M. L. Sandberg, and W. Hammerschmidt, unpublished data. Back

Received 7/ 9/02. Accepted 3/31/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Anonymous. Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8, Vol. 70. Lyon: IARC, 1997.
  2. Kieff E., Rickinson A. B. Epstein-Barr virus and its replication Ed. 4 Knipe D. M. Howley P. M. Griffin D. E. Martin M. A. Lamb R. A. Roizman B. Straus S. E. eds. . Fields’ Virology, 2: 2511-2573, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 2001.
  3. Baichwal V. R., Sugden B. Transformation of Balb 3T3 cells by the BNLF-1 gene of Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene, 2: 461-467, 1988.[Medline]
  4. Moorthy R. K., Thorley-Lawson D. A. All three domains of the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein LMP-1 are required for transformation of rat-1 fibroblasts. J. Virol., 67: 1638-1646, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wang D., Liebowitz D., Kieff E. An EBV membrane protein expressed in immortalized lymphocytes transforms established rodent cells. Cell, 43: 831-840, 1985.[Medline]
  6. Wilson J. B., Weinberg W., Johnson R., Yuspa S., Levine A. J. Expression of the BNLF-1 oncogene of Epstein-Barr virus in the skin of transgenic mice induces hyperplasia and aberrant expression of keratin 6. Cell, 61: 1315-1327, 1990.[Medline]
  7. Kulwichit W., Edwards R. H., Davenport E. M., Baskar J. F., Godfrey V., Raab-Traub N. Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces B cell lymphoma in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 11963-11968, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kilger E., Kieser A., Baumann M., Hammerschmidt W. Epstein-Barr virus-mediated B-cell proliferation is dependent upon latent membrane protein 1, which simulates an activated CD40 receptor. EMBO J., 17: 1700-1709, 1998.[Medline]
  9. Zimber-Strobl U., Kempkes B., Marschall G., Zeidler R., Van Kooten C., Banchereau J., Bornkamm G. W., Hammerschmidt W. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP1) is not sufficient to maintain proliferation of B cells but both it and activated CD40 can prolong their survival. EMBO J., 15: 7070-7078, 1996.[Medline]
  10. Uchida J., Yasui T., Takaoka-Shichijo Y., Muraoka M., Kulwichit W., Raab-Traub N., Kikutani H. Mimicry of CD40 signals by Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 in B lymphocyte responses. Science (Wash. DC), 286: 300-303, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gires O., Zimber-Strobl U., Gonnella R., Ueffing M., Marschall G., Zeidler R., Pich D., Hammerschmidt W. Latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus mimics a constitutively active receptor molecule. EMBO J., 16: 6131-6140, 1997.[Medline]
  12. Kaykas A., Worringer K., Sugden B. CD40 and LMP-1 both signal from lipid rafts but LMP-1 assembles a distinct, more efficient signaling complex. EMBO J., 20: 2641-2654, 2001.[Medline]
  13. Floettmann J. E., Rowe M. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) C-terminus activation region 2 (CTAR2) maps to the far C-terminus and requires oligomerisation for NF-{kappa}B activation. Oncogene, 15: 1851-1858, 1997.[Medline]
  14. Izumi K. M., Kaye K. M., Kieff E. D. Epstein-Barr virus recombinant molecular genetic analysis of the LMP1 amino-terminal cytoplasmic domain reveals a probable structural role, with no component essential for primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation. J. Virol., 68: 4369-4376, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Coffin I. W., Erickson K. D., Hoedt-Miller M., Martin J. M. The cytoplasmic amino-terminus of the latent membrane protein-1 of Epstein-Barr virus: relationship between transmembrane orientation and effector functions of the carboxy-terminus and transmembrane domain. Oncogene, 20: 5313-5330, 2001.[Medline]
  16. Puls A., Eliopoulos A. G., Nobes C. D., Bridges T., Young L. S., Hall A. Activation of the small GTPase cdc42 by the inflammatory cytokines TNF{alpha} and IL-1, and by the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1. J. Cell Sci., 112: 2983-2992, 1999.[Abstract]
  17. Higuchi M., Izumi K. M., Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus latent-infection membrane proteins are palmitoylated and raft-associated: protein 1 binds to the cytoskeleton through TNF receptor cytoplasmic factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 4675-4680, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Izumi K. M., Kieff E. D. The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product latent membrane protein 1 engages the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated death domain protein to mediate B lymphocyte growth transformation and activate NF-{kappa}B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 12592-12597, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kieser A., Kaiser C., Hammerschmidt W. LMP1 signal transduction differs substantially from TNF receptor 1 signaling in the molecular functions of TRADD and TRAF2. EMBO J., 18: 2511-2521, 1999.[Medline]
  20. Sandberg M., Hammerschmidt W., Sugden B. Characterization of LMP-1’s association with TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3. J. Virol., 71: 4649-4656, 1997.[Abstract]
  21. Mosialos G., Birkenbach M., Yalamanchili R., VanArsdale T., Ware C., Kieff E. The Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 engages signaling proteins for the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. Cell, 80: 389-399, 1995.[Medline]
  22. Schultheiss U., Puschner S., Kremmer E., Mak T. W., Engelmann H., Hammerschmidt W., Kieser A. TRAF6 is a critical mediator of signal transduction by the viral oncogene latent membrane protein 1. EMBO J., 20: 5678-5691, 2001.[Medline]
  23. Devergne O., Hatzivassiliou E., Izumi K. M., Kaye K. M., Kleijnen M. F., Kieff E., Mosialos G. Association of TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 with an Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 domain important for B-lymphocyte transformation: role in NF-{kappa}B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 7098-7108, 1996.[Abstract]
  24. Brodeur S. R., Cheng G., Baltimore D., Thorley-Lawson D. A. Localization of the major NF-{kappa}B-activating site and the sole TRAF3 binding site of LMP-1 defines two distinct signaling motifs. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 19777-19784, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Devergne O., Cahir McFarland E. D., Mosialos G., Izumi K. M., Ware C. F., Kieff E. Role of the TRAF binding site and NF-{kappa}B activation in Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1-induced cell gene expression. J. Virol., 72: 7900-7908, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Huen D. S., Henderson S. A., Croom-Carter D., Rowe M. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) mediates activation of NF-{kappa}B and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Oncogene, 10: 549-560, 1995.[Medline]
  27. Mitchell T., Sugden B. Stimulation of NF-{kappa}B-mediated transcription by mutant derivatives of the latent membrane protein of Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol., 69: 2968-2976, 1995.[Abstract]
  28. Eliopoulos A. G., Gallagher N. J., Blake S. M., Dawson C. W., Young L. S. Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 coregulates interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 production. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 16085-16096, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Vockerodt M., Haier B., Buttgereit P., Tesch H., Kube D. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces interleukin-10 in Burkitt’s lymphoma cells but not in Hodgkin’s cells involving the p38/SAPK2 pathway. Virology, 280: 183-198, 2001.[Medline]
  30. Kieser A., Kilger E., Gires O., Ueffing M., Kolch W., Hammerschmidt W. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 triggers AP-1 activity via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase cascade. EMBO J., 16: 6478-6485, 1997.[Medline]
  31. Izumi K. M., Kaye K. M., Kieff E. D. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 amino acid sequence that engages tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factors is critical for primary B lymphocyte growth transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 1447-1452, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gires O., Kohlhuber F., Kilger E., Baumann M., Kieser A., Kaiser C., Zeidler R., Scheffer B., Ueffing M., Hammerschmidt W. Latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus interacts with JAK3 and activates STAT proteins. EMBO J., 18: 3064-3073, 1999.[Medline]
  33. Brennan P., Floettmann J. E., Mehl A., Jones M., Rowe M. Mechanism of action of a novel latent membrane protein-1 dominant negative. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 1195-1203, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Higuchi M., Kieff E., Izumi K. M. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 putative Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) binding domain does not mediate JAK3 association or activation in B-lymphoma or lymphoblastoid cell lines. J. Virol., 76: 455-459, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kaye K. M., Izumi K. M., Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 9150-9154, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Kaye K. M., Izumi K. M., Mosialos G., Kieff E. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 cytoplasmic carboxy terminus is essential for B-lymphocyte transformation; fibroblast cocultivation complements a critical function within the terminal 155 residues. J. Virol., 69: 675-683, 1995.[Abstract]
  37. Kaye K. M., Izumi K. M., Li H., Johannsen E., Davidson D., Longnecker R., Kieff E. An Epstein-Barr virus that expresses only the first 231 LMP1 amino acids efficiently initiates primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation. J. Virol., 73: 10525-10530, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Delecluse H. J., Hilsendegen T., Pich D., Zeidler R., Hammerschmidt W. Propagation and recovery of intact, infectious Epstein-Barr virus from prokaryotic to human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 8245-8250, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Johannessen I., Crawford D. H. In vivo models for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disease (BLPD). Rev. Med. Virol., 9: 263-277, 1999.[Medline]
  40. Feederle R., Kost M., Baumann M., Janz A., Drouet E., Hammerschmidt W., Delecluse H. J. The Epstein-Barr virus lytic program is controlled by the cooperative functions of two transactivators. EMBO J., 19: 3080-3089, 2000.[Medline]
  41. Zeidler R., Meissner P., Eissner G., Lazis S., Hammerschmidt W. Rapid proliferation of B cells from adenoids in response to Epstein-Barr virus infection. Cancer Res., 56: 5610-5614, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Janz A., Oezel M., Kurzeder C., Mautner J., Pich D., Kost M., Hammerschmidt W., Delecluse H. J. Infectious Epstein-Barr virus lacking major glycoprotein BLLF1 (gp350/220) demonstrates the existence of additional viral ligands. J. Virol., 74: 10142-10152, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Hammerschmidt W., Sugden B. Identification and characterization of oriLyt, a lytic origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus. Cell, 55: 427-433, 1988.[Medline]
  44. Sugden B., Mark W. Clonal transformation of adult human leukocytes by Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol., 23: 503-508, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Neuhierl B., Feederle R., Hammerschmidt W., Delecluse H. J. Glycoprotein gp110 of Epstein-Barr virus determines viral tropism and efficiency of infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 15036-15041, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Erickson K. D., Martin J. M. The late lytic LMP-1 protein of Epstein-Barr virus can negatively regulate LMP-1 signaling. J. Virol., 74: 1057-1060, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hammerschmidt W., Sugden B., Baichwal V. R. The transforming domain alone of the latent membrane protein of Epstein-Barr virus is toxic to cells when expressed at high levels. J. Virol., 63: 2469-2475, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kempkes B., Pich D., Zeidler R., Sugden B., Hammerschmidt W. Immortalization of human B lymphocytes by a plasmid containing 71 kilobase pairs of Epstein-Barr virus DNA. J. Virol., 69: 231-238, 1995.[Abstract]
  49. Kempkes B., Pich D., Zeidler R., Hammerschmidt W. Immortalization of human primary B lymphocytes in vitro with DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 5875-5879, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Frisan T., Levitsky V., Masucci M. Limiting dilution assay. Methods Mol. Biol., 174: 213-216, 2001.[Medline]
  51. Pope J. H., Horne M. K., Scott W. Transformation of foetal human keukocytes in vitro by filtrates of a human leukaemic cell line containing herpes-like virus. Int. J. Cancer, 3: 857-866, 1968.[Medline]
  52. Henle W., Diehl V., Kohn G., Zur Hausen H., Henle G. Herpes-type virus and chromosome marker in normal leukocytes after growth with irradiated Burkitt cells. Science (Wash. DC), 157: 1064-1065, 1967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Tahara H., Tokutake Y., Maeda S., Kataoka H., Watanabe T., Satoh M., Matsumoto T., Sugawara M., Ide T., Goto M., Furuichi Y., Sugimoto M. Abnormal telomere dynamics of B-lymphoblastoid cell strains from Werner’s syndrome patients transformed by Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene, 15: 1911-1920, 1997.[Medline]
  54. Counter C. M., Botelho F. M., Wang P., Harley C. B., Bacchetti S. Stabilization of short telomeres and telomerase activity accompany immortalization of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human B lymphocytes. J. Virol., 68: 3410-3414, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Hammerschmidt W., Sugden B. Genetic analysis of immortalizing functions of Epstein-Barr virus in human B lymphocytes. Nature (Lond.), 340: 393-397, 1989.[Medline]
  56. Tomkinson B., Robertson E., Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear proteins EBNA-3A and EBNA-3C are essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation. J. Virol., 67: 2014-2025, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Aviel S., Winberg G., Massucci M., Ciechanover A. Degradation of the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 23491-23499, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Moorthy R. K., Thorley-Lawson D. A. Biochemical, genetic, and functional analyses of the phosphorylation sites on the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded oncogenic latent membrane protein LMP-1. J. Virol., 67: 2637-2645, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Baichwal V. R., Sugden B. The multiple membrane-spanning segments of the BNLF-1 oncogene from Epstein-Barr virus are required for transformation. Oncogene, 4: 67-74, 1989.[Medline]
  60. Kaykas A., Sugden B. The amino-terminus and membrane-spanning domains of LMP-1 inhibit cell proliferation. Oncogene, 19: 1400-1410, 2000.[Medline]
  61. Bloss T., Kaykas A., Sugden B. Dissociation of patching by latent membrane protein-1 of Epstein-Barr virus from its stimulation of NF-{kappa}B activity. J Gen Virol, 80: 3227-3232, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Kaye K. M., Devergne O., Harada J. N., Izumi K. M., Yalamanchili R., Kieff E., Mosialos G. Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 2 is a mediator of NF-{kappa}B activation by latent infection membrane protein 1, the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 11085-11090, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Izumi K. M., McFarland E. C., Riley E. A., Rizzo D., Chen Y., Kieff E. The residues between the two transformation effector sites of Epstein-Barr Virus latent membrane protein 1 are not critical for B-lymphocyte growth transformation. J. Virol., 73: 9908-9916, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Jabara H. H., Buckley R. H., Roberts J. L., Lefranc G., Loiselet J., Khalil G., Geha R. S. Role of JAK3 in CD40-mediated signaling. Blood, 92: 2435-2440, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Eliopoulos A. G., Young L. S. Activation of the cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway by the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). Oncogene, 16: 1731-1742, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Shannon-Lowe, E. Adland, A. I. Bell, H.-J. Delecluse, A. B. Rickinson, and M. Rowe
Features Distinguishing Epstein-Barr Virus Infections of Epithelial Cells and B Cells: Viral Genome Expression, Genome Maintenance, and Genome Amplification
J. Virol., August 1, 2009; 83(15): 7749 - 7760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. F. Schulz and S. Cordes
Is the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA-1 protein an oncogen?
PNAS, February 17, 2009; 106(7): 2091 - 2092.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Carbone, E. Cesarman, M. Spina, A. Gloghini, and T. F. Schulz
HIV-associated lymphomas and gamma-herpesviruses
Blood, February 5, 2009; 113(6): 1213 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Y.-R. Chen, M.-T. Liu, Y.-T. Chang, C.-C. Wu, C.-Y. Hu, and J.-Y. Chen
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Represses DNA Repair through the PI3K/Akt/FOXO3a Pathway in Human Epithelial Cells
J. Virol., August 15, 2008; 82(16): 8124 - 8137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Y. Lee and B. Sugden
The LMP1 oncogene of EBV activates PERK and the unfolded protein response to drive its own synthesis
Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2280 - 2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. L. Lambert and O. M. Martinez
Latent Membrane Protein 1 of EBV Activates Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase to Induce Production of IL-10
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8225 - 8234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
Y.-F. Chiu, C.-P. Tung, Y.-H. Lee, W.-H. Wang, C. Li, J.-Y. Hung, C.-Y. Wang, Y. Kawaguchi, and S.-T. Liu
A comprehensive library of mutations of Epstein Barr virus
J. Gen. Virol., September 1, 2007; 88(9): 2463 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. Lee and B. Sugden
A Membrane Leucine Heptad Contributes to Trafficking, Signaling, and Transformation by Latent Membrane Protein 1
J. Virol., September 1, 2007; 81(17): 9121 - 9130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
V. Soni, T. Yasui, E. Cahir-McFarland, and E. Kieff
LMP1 Transmembrane Domain 1 and 2 (TM1-2) FWLY Mediates Intermolecular Interactions with TM3-6 To Activate NF-{kappa}B
J. Virol., November 1, 2006; 80(21): 10787 - 10793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Altmann, D. Pich, R. Ruiss, J. Wang, B. Sugden, and W. Hammerschmidt
Transcriptional activation by EBV nuclear antigen 1 is essential for the expression of EBV's transforming genes
PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 14188 - 14193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. M. Brinkmann and T. F. Schulz
Regulation of intracellular signalling by the terminal membrane proteins of members of the Gammaherpesvirinae.
J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2006; 87(Pt 5): 1047 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Suarez, O. Lortholary, O. Hermine, and M. Lecuit
Infection-associated lymphomas derived from marginal zone B cells: a model of antigen-driven lymphoproliferation
Blood, April 15, 2006; 107(8): 3034 - 3044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. K. Hong, M. L. Gulley, W.-H. Feng, H.-J. Delecluse, E. Holley-Guthrie, and S. C. Kenney
Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Infection Contributes to Lymphoproliferative Disease in a SCID Mouse Model
J. Virol., November 15, 2005; 79(22): 13993 - 14003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. T. Lu, R. L. Dryer, C. Song, and L. R. Covey
Maintenance of the CD40-related immunodeficient response in hyper-IgM B cells immortalized with a LMP1-regulated mini-EBV
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 78(3): 620 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. L. Kelly, A. E. Milner, R. J. Tierney, D. S. G. Croom-Carter, M. Altmann, W. Hammerschmidt, A. I. Bell, and A. B. Rickinson
Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 2 (EBNA2) Gene Deletion Is Consistently Linked with EBNA3A, -3B, and -3C Expression in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells and with Increased Resistance to Apoptosis
J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10709 - 10717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. Peng, S. C. Moses, J. Tan, E. Kremmer, and P. D. Ling
The Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-LP Protein Preferentially Coactivates EBNA2-Mediated Stimulation of Latent Membrane Proteins Expressed from the Viral Divergent Promoter
J. Virol., April 1, 2005; 79(7): 4492 - 4505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. N. Everly Jr., B. A. Mainou, and N. Raab-Traub
Induction of Id1 and Id3 by Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus and Regulation of p27/Kip and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 in Rodent Fibroblast Transformation
J. Virol., December 15, 2004; 78(24): 13470 - 13478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. V. Gordadze, C. W. Onunwor, R. Peng, D. Poston, E. Kremmer, and P. D. Ling
EBNA2 Amino Acids 3 to 30 Are Required for Induction of LMP-1 and Immortalization Maintenance
J. Virol., April 15, 2004; 78(8): 3919 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. Lam, M. L. Sandberg, and B. Sugden
High Physiological Levels of LMP1 Result in Phosphorylation of eIF2{alpha} in Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected Cells
J. Virol., February 15, 2004; 78(4): 1657 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. N. D'Souza, L. C. Edelstein, P. M. Pegman, S. M. Smith, S. T. Loughran, A. Clarke, A. Mehl, M. Rowe, C. Gelinas, and D. Walls
Nuclear Factor {kappa}B-Dependent Activation of the Antiapoptotic bfl-1 Gene by the Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 and Activated CD40 Receptor
J. Virol., February 15, 2004; 78(4): 1800 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Humme, G. Reisbach, R. Feederle, H.-J. Delecluse, K. Bousset, W. Hammerschmidt, and A. Schepers
The EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) enhances B cell immortalization several thousandfold
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10989 - 10994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dirmeier, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dirmeier, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online