| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Units of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors [C. Casa., P. Da., L. R., P. De., F. R., G. P., C. Cast.], Colorectal Surgery [G. G., F. B., E. L.], Molecular Therapy [D. M.], and Determinants of Response to Prognosis and Treatment [A. C.], and Department of Pathology [S. A.], Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CRC has been considered poorly immunogenic and, therefore, refractory to immune-based interventions. However, with the discovery of the molecular nature of TAAs as well as the development of the reverse-immunology approaches, it became clear that CRC cells do express proteins able to induce a T cell-mediated response (2, 3, 4, 5) . Systemic antitumor T-cell response may occur in CRC patients with advanced metastatic disease (2) . Moreover, it has been demonstrated that TILs within cancer/cell nest do have a prognostic value (6) . These findings support the conclusion that CRC could be immunogenic in vivo and imply that strategies aimed at potentiating immune-responses may lead to a clinical benefit when administered in an adjuvant setting (7 , 8) .
Most of the immunological interventions in CRC patients were aimed at stimulating the immune system against a specific TAAs defined by reverse-immunology approaches (3 , 9 , 10) . Attention has been focused on mucins, carcinoembryogenic antigen and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (11, 12, 13) . Although present also in normal colonic mucosa, these proteins are overexpressed in CRC, and immunotherapy approaches exploiting these antigens have led to the in vivo expansion of a systemic antigen-specific immunity, although only occasionally associated with objective clinical responses (14, 15, 16, 17) .
Thus, identification of new TAAs remains one of the major goals for designing a more effective immunological treatment of CRC. Ideal targets for immunotherapy are gene products silenced in normal tissues, overexpressed in cancer cells, and directly involved in tumor survival and progression. Boosting the immune response against this type of proteins can be a strategy that, avoiding or at least limiting the in vivo generation of antigen-loss variants, could be more efficient in the control of in vivo tumor growth and in affecting the disease prognosis.
IAPs constitute a family of proteins that potentially fulfills the features described above, because their main function is to block apoptosis, thus preventing cells from physiological death and, therefore, extending cell survival (18 , 19) . Survivin, a recently described member of IAPs (20) , shows unique features if compared with other apoptosis regulators. First, it is practically undetectable in normal differentiated tissues but overexpressed in most human cancers (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) , including CRC (27, 28, 29) . Second, survivin is endowed with dual functions and, in addition to suppress apoptosis, it is also involved in regulating cell division (30 , 31) . In proliferating cells, survivin reaches maximal levels in G2/M phase and becomes down-regulated in G1 phase. Because of its cell-cycle-regulated expression and tumor specificity, survivin is thought to directly confer a selective growth advantage to tumor cells, allowing their progression through mitosis and leading to resistance to proapoptotic drugs (31 , 32) . In agreement with these functions, survivin overexpression correlates with tumor progression and appears to be a bad prognostic factor for a variety of solid tumors including CRC (22 , 24, 25, 26, 27) . Therefore, survivin may be operationally considered a potential TAA, provided that such protein encompasses peptide epitopes recognized by T cells of cancer patients.
In the present study, we aimed at assessing such a hypothesis in CRC patients. Therefore, HLA-A2-positive CRC patients at different disease stages have been selected and their T cell-mediated response to survivin evaluated by a reverse-immunology approach. Taking advantage of a HLA-A2 survivin-derived peptide, shown previously to be a CD8+ T-cell epitope (33, 34, 35) , and using the recombinant protein, our data indicate that CRC patients may develop systemic class I and class II HLA-restricted T-cell responses against survivin; this specific immunity could be detected also in subjects with primary tumor and no metastatic disease. The simultaneous detection of survivin-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell immunity, together with the evidence that CRC cells process and present survivin-derived peptides, support an immunological role of this protein in CRC patients and make survivin an appealing candidate for an immune-based therapy.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MHC Stabilization Assay.
Evaluation of HLA-A2 binding affinity was performed by flow cytometric assay based on the use of the HLA-A*0201 TAP-deficient T2 lymphoma cell line as described previously (36)
. Briefly, 5 x 105 T2 cells/well were seeded in a 48-well plate and incubated overnight at 27°C in 500 µl of RPMI 1640 (Bio-Whittaker Europe, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 10% FCS (Bio-Whittaker Europe) and 2.5 µg/ml of ß2-microglobulin (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). Peptides were added to each well at concentrations ranging from 10 µM to 0.01 µM. After incubation, cells were washed to remove unbounded peptide and the surface expression of HLA-A2 molecules was evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence using, as primary antibody, the anti-HLA-A2 BB7.2 mAb (37)
and a FITC-conjugated goat antimouse immunoglobulin-specific antibody (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA). Fluorescence intensity was evaluated using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Data are reported as percentage of increase (over control) of BB7.2 mean fluorescence channel number reactivity. Controls are T2 cells cultured with 2.5 µg/ml of ß2-microglobulin but without peptide.
To determine the stability of the peptide/HLA-A2 complex, 2 x 106 T2 cells were incubated overnight at 27°C in 2 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and 2.5 µg/ml of ß2-microglobulin. Peptides were added at a concentration of 10 µM. Cells were then washed to remove the unbounded peptide and incubated at 37°C for 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 h. Cell surface expression of HLA-A2 at each time of incubation was evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence using the anti-HLA-A2 BB7.2 mAb. Results are expressed as percentage (over control) of the remaining BB7.2 mean fluorescence channel number reactivity. Controls are the BB7.2 mean fluorescence channel number of T2 cells at the onset of incubation at 37°C.
Patient PBMCs.
Upon informed consent, blood samples were collected from HLA-2-positive patients with CRC, who underwent curative resection at the Unit of Colorectal Surgery of our Institute. PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation of heparinized blood. Erythrocytes were lysed using ACK hypotonic solution, and then mononuclear cells were washed twice with PBS (Bio-Whittaker Europe), resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 30% heat-inactivated human serum and 10% DMSO (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. One ml of fresh blood samples treated previously with ACK [100 µM EDTA, 10 mM KHCO3, and 155 mM NH4Cl (pH 7.2)] hypotonic solution was used for the analysis of HLA-A2 expression. Cells were stained with the mAb BB7.2 and then with a FITC-conjugated goat antimouse IgG (BioSource International). Fluorescence intensity was analyzed by a FACScan flow cytometer and CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). This preliminary screening allowed us to select HLA-A2 patients additionally confirmed to be HLA-A*0201 by genotyping. The clinical features of the selected patients are reported in Table 1
.
|
-irradiated (3000 rad). Free peptide was washed out and APCs added at a stimulator:responder ratio of 5:1.
Patient PBMCs were also cultured in vitro for 1 week in the presence of 5 µg/ml of the survivin recombinant protein, and IL-2 was added 2 days later, at a final concentration of 60 IU/ml. Restimulation was performed every week, by adding autologous,
-irradiated (3000 rad) PBMCs pulsed for 2 h with 5 µg/ml of the recombinant protein. Pulsed APCs were added at stimulator:responder ratio of 5:1. Cells were maintained in culture in the presence of 60 IU/ml of IL-2. Functional characterization of T-cell lines was performed by ELISPOT assay 7 days after the last restimulation. Cell-surface phenotype was also monitored in the growing T cells by analyzing the expression of T cell-specific markers CD3, CD4, and CD8.
Stable Transfection of C1R Cell Line.
The C1R cell line is a human plasmacytoid leukemia cell line that does not express endogenous HLA-A or -B. C1R expressing HLA-A2 allele available in our laboratory (C1R-A2) were electroporated with pcDNA3/SVV plasmid, encoding the full-length cDNA of survivin gene. Briefly, 5 x 106 cells in 500 µl of RPMI 1640 without serum were transfected with 10 µg of plasmid DNA at 250 V/950 µF and then cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and subjected to selection with 0.7 mg/ml of G418 (Sigma-Aldrich). After a selection period of 1 month, survivin expression in transfected cells was tested by reverse transcription-PCR and by Western blot analysis. The parental C1R-A2 cell line showed a basal level of survivin expression that was strongly increased in the survivin-transfected C1R-A2 cells (C1R-A2/SVV) as detected by both reverse transcription-PCR (data not shown) and Western blot (Fig. 1
, Lanes 1 and 2).
|
Normal ovarian cells were obtained by scraping the surface of normal ovaries obtained at surgery for benign or malignant gynecological diseases other then ovarian carcinoma (38) , and normal renal epithelial cells were obtained by enzymatic digestion of nephrectomy specimens (39) . Human normal cells were maintained in culture for three to five passages in 199-MCDB105 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) or in DMEM (Bio-Whittaker Europe) supplemented with 15% FCS.
Primary cultures of ovarian and renal epithelial cells were obtained selecting adherent cells after enzymatic digestion of normal tissue specimens. The expression of HLA-A2 allele in the engineered CG-758 (CG-758/A2) as well as in all of the other tumor cell lines was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis using the anti-HLA-A2 BB7.2 mAb. All of the cell lines showed >95% of HLA-A2+ cells with a mean fluorescence intensity ranging from 102 to 103 (data not shown). Ovarian and renal epithelial cells were HLA-A2 negative (data not shown).
Although with different level of intensity, all of the tumor cell lines tested were positive for survivin expression as evaluated by Western blot (Fig. 1)
. PBMCs, and renal and ovarian epithelial normal cells did not show any survivin-specific band at 16 kDa (Fig. 1)
.
T-Cell Stimulation Assay.
For experiments aimed at evaluating the presence of a CD8+-specific T-cell response, tumor cells, survivin-transfected C1R-A2, autologous PBMCs, and C1R-A2 pulsed for 2 h at 37°C with 2 µg/ml of SVV-1 peptide were used as targets. Inhibition experiments were performed by adding, during the last 30 min of the pulsing period, 1 µg/well of anticlass I HLA W6/32 mAb. Stimulation assays were performed in 96-well plates in a final volume of 150 µl and using an E:T ratio of 1:1. After overnight incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, supernatant were collected and the content of cytokines determined with specific ELISA.
For experiments evaluating the presence of a CD4+-specific T-cell response, 5 x 104 autologous LCLs pulsed overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2 with 2 µg/ml of the recombinant protein (survivin or TT as a control) or with total lysates obtained by four cycles of freezing and thawing of 5 x 104 cells were used as target. Inhibition experiments were performed by adding, during the last 2 h of the pulsing period, 1 µg/well of anti-HLA-DR L243 mAb. T cells were then added and incubation continued for 24 h. Stimulation assays were performed in 96-well plates in a final volume of 200 µl. Culture supernatants were collected, and IFN-
released was determined by ELISA using a commercial kit (Endogen, Woburn, MA).
ELISPOT Assay.
Nitrocellulose plates (96-well; MAIPS 450; Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated overnight with 50 µl/well of 15 µg/ml antihuman IFN-
mAb (Mabtech, Nacka, Sweden), washed, and blocked with PBS (BioWhittaker). Peptide-sensitized T cells (5 x 104 or 2 x 104 as indicated in the figures) were then seeded in 100 µl of medium. After incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 30 min, 100 µl of medium containing 2 x 104 target cells, prepared as described above, were added to each well. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, ELISPOT was then developed according to manufactory instructions. Briefly, plates were washed six times with PBS. Wells were incubated for 2 h at 37°C with 50 µl/well of biotinylated mouse antihuman IFN-
mAb (Mabtech) at a concentration of 2.5 µg/ml. After washing with PBS, 100 µl of streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase diluted 1:1000 was added for 1 h at room temperature. After another washing step with PBS, 100 µl/well of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium substrate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was added to each well for 1020 min. Color development was stopped by washing under running tap water. After drying at room temperature, IFN-
-secreting T cells were counted using the automated image analysis system ELISPOT Reader (AID, Strassberg, Germany). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
ELISA for IL-2.
Evaluation of IL-2 release by stimulated lymphocytes was performed using precoated wells (IL-2 ELISA kit; Diaclone Research, Besançon, France). Target cells and lymphocytes were incubated in 96-well plates at stimulator:responder ratio of 1:1 in 96-well plates, at a concentration of 2 x 104 cells/well for each population. Coculture was performed overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Then supernatants were collected and added to the precoated plates.
CTLL-2 Proliferation Assay.
Target cells and lymphocytes were incubated in 96-well plates at stimulator:responder ratio of 1:1 in 96-well plates, at a concentration of 2 x 104 cells/well for each population. Coculture was performed overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Supernatants were removed after 24 h for estimation of IL-2 secretion by culturing with the IL-2-dependent T-cell line CTLL-2. Briefly, CTLL-2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5000 cells/well, in the presence of 53 µM ß-mercaptoethanol; supernatants were added to each well, and culture was performed for 18 h. Proliferation was determined by pulsing with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) for the final 18 h of culture.
Tetramer Staining.
To stain survivin-specific CD8+ T cells, soluble tetrameric complexes of HLA-A2/peptide were produced using the SVV-1 decamer. Tetramers were prepared by the tetramer facility at DIBIT (San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy). 5 x 105 stimulated T cells were incubated for 45 min at 4°C with 1 µl of SVV-1/HLA-A*0201 tetramer (PE-conjugated) and washed three times with PBS 1x. Then cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb for 30 min at 4°C and washed. Fluorescence intensity was evaluated using a FACScan flow cytometer and analyzed using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). The percentage of peptide-specific T cells was evaluated after gating the CD8+ T cells inside the T-cell population. As a negative control, survivin-specific T cells were also stained with Flu5866/HLA-A*0201 tetramer (ProImmune, Oxford, United Kingdom). As positive control of Flu5866/HLA-A*0201 tetramer, this same tetramer was used to stain PBMCs from a HLA-A*0201 healthy donor, cultured for 3 weeks in the presence of Flu5866 peptide.
Western Blot Analysis.
Cells were pelleted, washed in PBS, and lysed using a buffer containing 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris HCl and 150 mM NaCl plus 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. After protein quantification performed by using the DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad), 20 µg of proteins were loaded on each lane and subjected to SDS-PAGE on 15% acrylamide gel. Proteins were then transferred overnight onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Membranes were saturated for 1 h using 5% dry milk in 1x Tris-buffered saline 0.2% Tween and incubated for 2 h with 1 µg/ml antisurvivin antibody (ab7170; AbCam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) or with antiactin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:1000 in the same solution. The membranes were then incubated for 1 h with a mouse antihuman IgG antibody conjugated to peroxidase (BD Transduction Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany). The detection followed with the ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Blots were washed, and bands were visualized by ECL plus (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and autoradiography.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ELISPOT assays were performed. Autologous PBMCs loaded with SVV-1 peptide (Fig. 3, AC
|
increased when peptide-loaded C1R-A2 cells were used as targets (Fig. 3, AC
inducer suggesting that the in vitro peptide-stimulated T cells efficiently recognized SVV-1 peptide when endogenously processed and presented (Fig. 3, AC
T cells specifically recognizing the naturally processed and presented survivin peptide were earlier detectable in 2 additional patients (Fig. 3, E and F)
. T cells activated in vitro by peptide stimulation for 1 or 2 weeks were able to release IFN-
in response to C1R-A2 cell line overexpressing survivin protein. Conversely, no specific reactivity was found in PBMCs of 2 additional patients (patients #2 and #4, see Table 1
) and in 2 HLA-A2+ healthy donors tested (data not shown).
SVV-1-specific CD8+ T Cells Are Detected by Tetramer Staining.
T cells at week 3 of culture obtained from PBMCs of patients #1, #7, and #8 were enough in number to allow additional in vitro studies. To additionally confirm their survivin-specificity and their CD8+ phenotype, immunofluorescence staining was performed using SVV-1 specific PE-conjugated tetramer (Fig. 4)
. Compared with a nonstimulated control (Fig. 4
; patient 1, fresh PBMCs), a significant percentage of tetramer-positive T cells was observed in the CD8+ T-cell population for all of the 3 patients tested, with the highest frequency detected in T cells of patient #1 (Fig. 4)
. Conversely, no SVV-specific tetramer staining was detected in SVV-1-stimulated PBMCs from a healthy donor (donor 3R) that did not developed any survivin-specific reactivity as analyzed by ELISPOT (data not shown). Altogether, these results are, thus, consistent with those obtained by ELISPOT assays.
|
|
by patient T cells that, however, was not inhibited by the anticlass I HLA mAb W6/32. Again, as shown in Fig. 2
IFN-
is one of the cytokines released by stimulated T cells. However, optimal T-cell activation also leads to the induction of other cytokines that include IL-2, and, indeed, absence of induction of IL-2 release has been often associated with T-cell anergy (41)
. T cells of patients #1 and #7 were also evaluated for their capacity to release IL-2 in response to tumor stimulation (Fig. 6, A and B
, respectively). The CG-758/A2 colon cancer cells, but not the HLA-A2-negative parental cell line, specifically induced IL-2 release in a MHC-class I-dependent fashion, as detected by ELISA.
|
Altogether these data support the conclusion that survivin-specific T cells retain all their effector functions in response to tumor stimulation and imply that MHC/peptide complexes expressed at the tumor cell surface can lead to a full T-cell triggering.
Survivin-specific Immunogenicity in CRC Patients Includes Class II HLA-restricted T Cells.
Taking advantage of the availability of the survivin recombinant protein, the presence of class II HLA-restricted T cell-mediated response against survivin was evaluated in patients #1, #2, and #8 (Fig. 7, A, B, and C
, respectively). Patients #1 and #8 showed also a T cell-specific response to SVV-1 peptide (Fig. 3)
. Patient PBMCs were stimulated in vitro with the recombinant protein, and the reactivity of T cells obtained after two rounds of stimulations was evaluated by IFN-
ELISA. All of the 3 patients showed a class II-restricted recognition of autologous LCLs loaded with survivin protein, whereas no reactivity was detected when autologous LCLs were loaded with tetanus toxoid, used as negative control (Fig. 7, AC)
. The extent of the response varied between patients, with the best reactivity detected in the T-cell population of patient #8 (Fig. 7C)
.
|
(Fig. 7, AC)
production was HLA-DR-dependent, because the amount of cytokine was strongly reduced when T cells were stimulated in the presence of the anti-HLA-DR mAb L243. On the contrary, no activation occurred when normal epithelial cells that did not express survivin protein (see Fig. 1
Altogether these findings indicate the presence of survivin-specific, class-II HLA-restricted T cells in the peripheral blood of CRC patients. These T cells are endowed with the capacity to specifically release IFN-
in response to cell-derived survivin protein, providing its processing and presentation by autologous APCs.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date very few molecules have been found to be antigenic in CRC patients, the majority of such molecules being expressed by normal mucosal cells (3 , 9, 10, 11, 12 , 44) . The finding that T-cell epitopes for CD8+ and CD4+ T cells are present in survivin protein that is down-regulated in normal tissues, but overexpressed in most common cancer types (20 , 27) and has a crucial role in tumor progression (29) , makes this protein a relevant antigenic candidate also for an immune-based anticancer therapy (45) .
The SVV-1 (ELTLGEFLKL) peptide used to asses the immunogenic role of survivin in a class-I HLA restriction has been shown previously to be a T-cell epitope (33) eliciting specific CTLs in melanoma, CLL, and breast cancer patients (34 , 35) . Here we extend these findings, showing that the majority of CRC patients tested, 6 of 8, do have in their peripheral blood or in their tumor-associated lymphocytes survivin-specific T-cell precursors that, once sensitized in vitro, can recognize not only peptide-pulsed target cells, but also endogenously processed proteins expressed by appropriate APCs or by tumor cells. This same protocol of in vitro sensitization did not lead to any specific response in healthy donors, indicating that T cells of CRC patients have already recognized these TAAs upon encountering the tumor cells in vivo. Notably, the presence of a survivin-specific response was independent from the disease stage, because specific immunity could be detected even in a patient with a Dukes A tumor.
In the absence of the autologous tumor cells, the reactivity of survivin-specific T lymphocytes was tested using a panel of colon cancer cell lines. Our data showed that CRC cells do process and present sufficient HLA/survivin-peptide complexes to elicit a full T-cell response. In fact, tumor cells are efficiently recognized by T cells and, in addition to release IFN-
when stimulated by colon cancer cells, survivin-specific CD8+ T cells also released a detectable amount of IL-2. This cytokine is a key factor for CD8+ T cells, and impaired IL-2 release is often associated with T-cell anergy (41)
. Moreover, it has been shown that tumor cells often lead to a suboptimal activation of T-lymphocyte clones that does not include the induction of IL-2 (46)
. The mechanisms accounting for the full activation achieved by survivin-specific T cells, when stimulated by CRC cells, may include the high TCR avidity/affinity of the specific T cells in conjunction with the high level of survivin expression in tumor cells.
Increasing attention has been focused recently on the role of CD4+ T cells in antitumor immunity (47, 48, 49) . Stimulation of CD4+ T-cell functions was proved to be crucial for successful tumor eradication, and vaccination with tumor-specific helper epitope was a required step for the induction of a protective immune response (50) . Here we show that survivin-specific immunogenicity in CRC patients includes also class-II HLA-restricted T-cell responses, and survivin-specific HLA-DR-restricted T cells were detectable in 3 of 4 patients. Two patients with a survivin-specific CD4+ T cell-mediated response (patients #1 and #8) also developed a specific reactivity to HLA class I-restricted SVV-1 peptide, thus indicating that a complete activation of the different components of the adaptive immune response could occur in a single patient. Survivin-specific CD4+ T cells recognized the protein expressed by tumor cells suggesting a reprocessing of the protein and presentation of its epitopes by autologous APCs. These data suggest a role for these CD4+ T cells in cross-priming events occurring in vivo. However, we were unable to detect specific release of IL-2 with our in vitro activated T cells in response to recombinant or tumor-derived survivin (data not shown).
Studies aimed at identifying the immunogenic epitope eliciting HLA class-II restricted response are currently in progress. However, comparing the HLA-DR typing of the responding patients, it is likely that different T-cell epitopes might be present in the survivin protein, because no HLA-DR allele sharing was evident among the patients who showed a CD4+ T-cell response to survivin.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the simultaneous presence of T-cell response against survivin protein and survivin-derived class-I HLA-restricted epitope in CRC patients. We additionally showed that CRC cells could be recognized by survivin-specific T cells, whereas autologous PBMCs or normal epithelial cells did not.
Therefore, our results indicate that survivin could be considered an immunogenic TAA for CRC for which few molecularly characterized TAAs are currently available. Its immunological features, together with its pattern of expression, make this IAP protein a suitable target for designing immunotherapy approaches in CRC patients.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by a grant of European Community (QLK3-1999-00064) and by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (Milan). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39-02-2390-3230; Fax: 39-02-2390-2630; ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: CRC, colorectal cancer; APC, antigen-presenting cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; IAP, inhibitor of apoptosis protein; PE, phycoerythrin; IL, interleukin; LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; TAA, tumor-associated antigen; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot. ![]()
Received 10/ 7/02. Accepted 5/23/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ansen, M. O. Butler, A. Berezovskaya, A. P. Murray, K. Stevenson, L. M. Nadler, and N. Hirano Dissociation of Its Opposing Immunologic Effects Is Critical for the Optimization of Antitumor CD8+ T-Cell Responses Induced by Interleukin 21 Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 6125 - 6136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schaue, B. Comin-Anduix, A. Ribas, L. Zhang, L. Goodglick, J. W. Sayre, A. Debucquoy, K. Haustermans, and W. H. McBride T-Cell Responses to Survivin in Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4883 - 4890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-F. Wang, J. Kerzerho, O. Adotevi, H. Nuyttens, C. Badoual, G. Munier, S. Oudard, S. Tu, E. Tartour, and B. Maillere Comprehensive Analysis of HLA-DR- and HLA-DP4-Restricted CD4+ T Cell Response Specific for the Tumor-Shared Antigen Survivin in Healthy Donors and Cancer Patients J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 431 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Andersen, I. M. Svane, J. C. Becker, and P. t. Straten The Universal Character of the Tumor-Associated Antigen Survivin Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 5991 - 5994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Parmiani, V. Russo, A. Marrari, G. Cutolo, C. Casati, L. Pilla, C. Maccalli, L. Rivoltini, and C. Castelli Universal and Stemness-Related Tumor Antigens: Potential Use in Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5675 - 5679. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Siegel, A. Wagner, B. Friedrichs, A. Wendeler, L. Wendel, D. Kabelitz, J. Steinmann, A. Barsoum, J. Coggin, J. Rohrer, et al. Identification of HLA-A*0201-Presented T Cell Epitopes Derived from the Oncofetal Antigen-Immature Laminin Receptor Protein in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6935 - 6944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Casati, C. Camisaschi, F. Rini, F. Arienti, L. Rivoltini, F. Triebel, G. Parmiani, and C. Castelli Soluble Human LAG-3 Molecule Amplifies the In vitro Generation of Type 1 Tumor-Specific Immunity. Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 66(8): 4450 - 4460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Altieri Targeted therapy by disabling crossroad signaling networks: the survivin paradigm. Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 478 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fassnacht, J. Lee, C. Milazzo, D. Boczkowski, Z. Su, S. Nair, and E. Gilboa Induction of CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses to the Human Stromal Antigen, Fibroblast Activation Protein: Implication for Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5566 - 5571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Xiang, N. Mizutani, Y. Luo, C. Chiodoni, H. Zhou, M. Mizutani, Y. Ba, J. C. Becker, and R. A. Reisfeld A DNA Vaccine Targeting Survivin Combines Apoptosis with Suppression of Angiogenesis in Lung Tumor Eradication Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 65(2): 553 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Andersen, I. M. Svane, P. Kvistborg, O. J. Nielsen, E. Balslev, S. Reker, J. C. Becker, and P. t. Straten Immunogenicity of Bcl-2 in patients with cancer Blood, January 15, 2005; 105(2): 728 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pisarev, B. Yu, R. Salup, S. Sherman, D. C. Altieri, and D. I. Gabrilovich Full-Length Dominant-Negative Survivin for Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 9(17): 6523 - 6533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |