| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology and Genetics |
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [T. A., N. M. R., G. W.], and Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [A. A.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. These findings provide important insights into the modulation of apoptosis by TRAIL and IL-8 in ovarian cancer. The data suggest a potentially important role of IL-8 in protecting ovarian cancer cells from TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and signify a new potential chemotherapeutic target to augment TRAIL therapy. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The TRAIL3 or Apo2 ligand is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily of cell death-inducing ligands (7) . One of the most remarkable features of TRAIL is its ability to induce programmed cell death or apoptosis in a variety of tumor cell lines but not typically in normal or nontransformed cells (8) . Also, animal studies have demonstrated that TRAIL can induce regression of cancer xenografts without detrimental effects to normal cells (9) . These features make TRAIL a desirable therapeutic agent to fight cancer. TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells by interacting with the DRs DR4 and DR5. These receptors induce the apoptotic signal through interaction of their intracellular death domains with adaptor proteins. This event leads to the proteolytic activation of caspases and initiation of a proteolytic cascade that ultimately results in the demise of the cell (10) . Two other cell surface TRAIL receptors, DcR1 and DcR2, lack a functional death domain and compete with DR4 and DR5 for cell surface TRAIL binding and cannot transmit the apoptotic signal, therefore they are commonly known as the DcRs (11) . Activation of the DR pathways is thought to be a possible new method of treatment for cancer. It has been reported that the combination of chemotherapy and TRAIL could induce apoptosis in some chemoresistant and TRAIL-resistant ovarian cancer cells (12) .
Patients with ovarian cancer produce large amounts of ascitic fluid. The ascites fluid contains many growth factors (13 , 14) and provides an excellent environment conducive to the growth of ovarian cancer cells (15, 16, 17) . The concentrations of various cytokines have been examined in the ascites from patients with ovarian cancer. Compared with patients with benign gynecological disorders, ascites of patients with ovarian cancer showed significantly higher levels of IL-8 (18) . IL-8, a member of the C-X-C chemokine family, has been identified as a potent chemoattractant for T cells, neutrophils, and basophils (19, 20, 21) . Studies have demonstrated that IL-8 is a potent proangiogenic and proinflammatory factor implicated in tumor growth and metastasis (22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) .
Because the biological function of IL-8 in ovarian tumors is not yet entirely evident, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of IL-8 on TRAIL-induced apoptosis of the surface epithelium ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR3. The rationale for using OVCAR3 cells was that it has previously been determined that this cell line is sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (12) . We therefore sought to determine the viability of these cells after treatment with IL-8 and TRAIL over time. Several reports have proposed that differential expression of TRAIL receptors may establish a cells sensitivity to TRAIL (28) . We hypothesized that decreased expression of the TRAIL DRs may contribute to prolonged survival of OVCAR3 cells after IL-8 pretreatment. To test this, we evaluated the regulation of TRAIL receptor protein and mRNA expression in OVCAR3 cells after IL-8 treatment. We provide evidence here that IL-8 is capable of blocking TRAIL-mediated apoptosis through the regulation of TRAIL receptor expression.
We also provide evidence for possible regulation of other apoptotic mechanisms due to IL-8 and TRAIL treatments of this system. With the goal of identifying some of the molecular mechanisms that may be involved in TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and the role of IL-8 in blocking this apoptosis, we performed an array analysis. We discovered that a member of the MAPK superfamily, p38
, was among the genes regulated in this system by TRAIL and IL-8. There are five isoforms of the p38 group of MAPKs that have been identified to date: p38
; p38ß1; p38ß2; p38
; and p38
(29, 30, 31, 32, 33)
. Many of the cellular controls are regulated by a complex system of interactive networks or signal transduction pathways, such as the MAPKs. Two other important members of the human MAPK superfamily, other than p38, are the ERK and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (34)
. Diverse extracellular stimuli such as physiological stress, lipopolysaccharide, osmotic stress, UV exposure, and proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor
have been shown to trigger the stress-regulated protein kinase cascade, p38 MAPK pathway (35, 36, 37, 38, 39)
. The importance of this information led us to also study whether there was any significant evidence for regulation of the p38 MAPK member after IL-8 treatment.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Vitro Viability and TUNEL Assay.
OVCAR3 cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml and allowed to adhere to the plate overnight. The cells were incubated with either TRAIL (1 µg/ml; Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) or IL-8 (10 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 16 h or pretreated with IL-8 for 16 h before the addition of the TRAIL. All of the experiments performed throughout this paper used the same concentrations of IL-8 and TRAIL stated above. Each treatment was conducted at 37°C for 6, 24, or 48 h. The cells were trypsinized and washed with 1x PBS, and 5 x 105 cells were mounted on the slides using a Cytospin centrifuge. Cells were fixed with 4.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized for 2 min at 0°C with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate. The slides were incubated with the TUNEL reagent (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) for 1 h at 37°C and counterstained with 0.05 mg/ml propidium iodide in PBS. The cells were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
All viability data for each time point are based on the evaluation of 200 cells/slide in triplicate for each experimental condition. Results of multiple experiments are given as the mean ± SE.
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting.
Total protein was extracted by lysing the cells in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM sodium vanadate, and 0.1% NP40. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 8000 x g for 5 min, and protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay. The cellular proteins (50 µg/lane) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C in 10% NFDM/PBS/0.1% Tween 20 and incubated for 1 h with either primary monoclonal AB or primary polyclonal AB diluted in 5% NFDM/PBS/0.1% Tween 20. The membranes were then incubated for 1 h with either antimouse or antirabbit AB (diluted 1:2500 in 5% NFDM/PBS/0.1% Tween 20). Proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence. Equal protein loading was confirmed by tubulin detection. The primary ABs used were caspase-8 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology), and p38
(Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY).
Semiquantitative RT-PCR Assays.
RNA was isolated from whole cell extracts of OVCAR3 cells after treatments using the procedure of the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA.). One-step RT-PCR was performed on 3 µg of RNA using the Clontech Titanium One-Step RT-PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) protocol. Samples were amplified simultaneously for GAPDH and DR4, DR5, DcR1, DcR2, or ERK6/p38
/SAPK3 with the following primers: F-GAPDH, 5'-CCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGCA-3'; R-GAPDH, 5'-TCTAGACGGCAGGTCAGGTCCACC-3'; F-DR4, 5'-TGCAACCATCAAACTTCA-3'; R-DR4, 5'-GATGTTTGCAAACTTGTC-3'; F-DR5, 5'-TGAGTCTGCTGCTCTGATCAC-3'; R-DR5, 5'-CAAGTCTGCAAAGTCATC-3'; F-DcR1, 5'-ATGCAAGGGGTGAAGG-3'; R-DcR1, 5'-GAGGTAATGAGAAGAGGC-3'; F-DcR2, 5'-GAAGGACATGAACGCCGCCGAAAAG-3'; R-DcR2, 5'-CACTACCTTATCATCATAGTGGTTTT-3'; F-ERK6/p38
/SAPK3, 5'-ATGAGCTCTCCGCCGCCCACCCGCAGT-3'; and R-ERK6/p38
/SAPK3, 5'-CCCAGTCATCACACTGACTGCCTGCCTGCC-3'. The cycling conditions for PCR consisted of the following: 94°C for 1 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and extension at 72°C for 2 min. Ten percent of the PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide (0.1 µg/ml). The fold induction for each of the TRAIL receptors after treatment was determined using the Kodak 1D Image Analysis Software (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), and levels were normalized for GAPDH expression.
Northern Blot Analyses.
RNA was isolated from whole cell extracts of OVCAR3 cells after treatments using the procedure of the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Our procedure for Northern analysis has been described elsewhere (40)
. Blots were probed with cDNA probes prepared using the TRAIL receptor primers and GAPDH primers listed above, labeled by the random primer method.
Analysis of Surface TRAIL Receptors by Flow Cytometry.
Clones were analyzed for the surface expression of TRAIL receptors DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2 by indirect staining with primary mouse antihuman TRAIL-R1 (DR4), TRAIL-R2 (DR5), TRAIL-R3 (DcR1), and TRAIL-R4 (DcR2) IgG (all obtained from Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) followed by phycoerythrin-conjugated rabbit antigoat IgG secondary AB (Sigma). OVCAR3 cells were treated with IL-8, TRAIL, or IL-8 + TRAIL for 24 or 48 h. The cells were then harvested after treatments, and staining for cell surface receptors was performed on 1 x 106 cells. Cells were resuspended in 10 µg of primary AB prediluted in 5% human plasma. After incubation with the primary AB, cells were washed with 0.1% gelatin/PBS and incubated with a secondary AB. Cells were then fixed in 10% buffered formalin and analyzed in 1% buffered formalin. The experiments were performed in duplicates, and mean values were calculated. Analysis was performed on a Beckman Coulter XL Analyzer.
Expression Analysis of Gene Regulation in OVCAR3 Cells.
The Atlas cDNA Apoptosis Expression Array (Clontech) was performed following the manufacturers protocol. A brief overview of the procedures used is as follows. The cells were incubated with either TRAIL or IL-8 for 16 h or pretreated with IL-8 for 16 h before the addition of the TRAIL. After 16 h of treatment, cells were harvested, and RNA was collected from each group. Probe mixtures were then synthesized by reverse transcribing each RNA population using the CDS Primer Mix specific for the Atlas Apoptosis Array and labeling with
-32P. Each of the radioactively labeled probe mixes prepared was then hybridized to a separate Atlas Array. The hybridization pattern after autoradiography was analyzed to determine changes in gene expression levels using Atlas Image 2.1 software (Clontech). Only differences of
5 in total intensity and fold change of intensity of
1.5 between two of the membranes were considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
55% cell death within 48 h (Fig. 1A)
9% cell death within 48 h of the treatment, similar to the control and the IL-8 alone treatments (6% and 8%, respectively; Fig. 1A
|
Regulation of TRAIL Receptors DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2 by TRAIL and IL-8 Treatments.
We hypothesized that regulation of TRAIL receptor expression may be involved in the ability of IL-8 to make the previously TRAIL-sensitive cells resistant. OVCAR3 cells were treated with TRAIL, IL-8, or IL-8 + TRAIL, as specified in "Materials and Methods," for a period of 6, 24, or 48 h. The cells were harvested after the treatments, and RNA was prepared from the whole cell lysates and analyzed by RT-PCR for the TRAIL receptors. When the OVCAR3 cells were treated for 6 h, we saw no differences in DR4 expression. However, we observed that after IL-8 treatment for 24 h, expression levels of DR4 were reduced (
6.5 fold) compared with cells that were not treated with IL-8, even in the presence of TRAIL (Fig. 2A)
. Similar results (DR4 reduced
7-fold) were observed for these cells when they were treated over 48 h with IL-8. DR5 expression increased upon 6 h of TRAIL treatment (1.2-fold) and TRAIL + IL-8 treatment (1.6-fold). For 24-h treatment, there was no observed change in DR5 expression. When the OVCAR3 cells were treated for 48 h, DR5 expression increased 2.0-fold upon treatment with TRAIL alone, 2.5-fold upon treatment with TRAIL + IL-8, and 2.2-fold upon treatment with IL-8 alone.
|
5-fold. There were minimal changes in DcR2 expression over 24 h of treatment. However, after 48 h of treatment with IL-8, even in the presence of TRAIL, we observed
2-fold decrease in expression.
We went on further to confirm the RT-PCR results through the use of Northern blot analyses (Fig. 2B)
. The OVCAR3 cells were treated as described previously for 24 and 48 h. Northern blot analyses were performed on the TRAIL receptors and GAPDH as described in "Materials and Methods." The results were able to confirm the effects of IL-8 on TRAIL receptor expression in OVCAR3 cells. These results suggest that the TRAIL receptors may play a significant role in the ability of IL-8 to block TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Surface TRAIL Receptors after IL-8 and TRAIL Treatments.
To further substantiate the role of TRAIL receptor regulation by IL-8, we examined the receptor profile on the cell surface by flow cytometry. The ovarian cancer cells were treated for 48 h with TRAIL, IL-8, or IL-8 + TRAIL to determine the surface protein expression levels of the specific TRAIL receptors (Fig. 3)
. Surface expression of DR4 was decreased by approximately 60% when cells were stimulated with IL-8 for 24 and 48 h of treatment, even when TRAIL was included in the treatment with IL-8 (Fig. 3, A and B)
. IL-8 also reduced surface expression of DcR1 approximately 50% and 32% after 24 and 48 h of treatment, respectively, and reduced surface expression of DcR2 approximately 20% and 72% at 24 and 48 h of treatment, respectively (Fig. 3, A and B)
. There was only an approximately 5% decrease in DR5 surface expression when cells were stimulated with IL-8 (Fig. 3, A and B)
. These data confirm that the receptor protein expression, as well as the RNA levels, was modulated by IL-8 treatments of these cells. These data further confirm that regulation of the TRAIL receptor expression may be involved in the ability of IL-8 to make the previously TRAIL-sensitive cells resistant.
|
|
Expression.
. RT-PCR was performed on the RNA isolated from the 16-h treatments using primers for p38
and GAPDH as a loading control (Fig. 5A)
expression was decreased with IL-8 pretreatment and that it was slightly increased with TRAIL treatment. Western blot was also performed on p38
to identify whether the results from the message were translated to protein; actin was used as the loading control (Fig. 5B)
protein levels were decreased when OVCAR3 cells were pretreated with IL-8 (Fig. 5B)
or other isoforms.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To further determine the molecular mechanisms that may be involved in the ability of IL-8 to block TRAIL-induced apoptosis in this system, we performed the array analysis. The results of the array suggested that p38
expression in OVCAR3 cells is modulated by treatment with cytokines. We determined from the array that p38
expression in OVCAR3 cells could be down-regulated by treatment with IL-8. We were able to confirm that p38
expression was down-regulated by IL-8 treatment using RT-PCR. We were also able to further confirm that protein expression of p38
is down-regulated by treatment of cells with IL-8 through use of Western blot analysis. At this point, we have been able to demonstrate that one of the five p38 MAPK isoforms, p38
, is regulated in OVCAR3 cells by TRAIL and IL-8 treatments. Studies have shown that certain cellular stresses, such as hypoxia, can specifically activate p38
(44)
. It has also been shown that p38
is activated by
irradiation and that it is necessary for G2 arrest after DNA damage due to the irradiation (45)
. Lee et al. (46)
have found, in human adenocarcinoma HeLa cells, that after TRAIL treatment there was an accumulation of reactive oxygen species, which in turn activated p38, which subsequently activated caspases. Our results suggest that p38
may be involved in TRAIL-induced apoptosis in these cells and that the ability of IL-8 to overcome this apoptosis may be dependent on regulation of p38
. Additional studies are necessary to clarify the role of p38
in TRAIL-induced apoptosis of OVCAR3 cells as well as the ability of IL-8 to inhibit this apoptosis.
In summary, this work demonstrates that pretreatment with IL-8 can desensitize OVCAR3 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. TRAIL has been proposed as therapy against some cancers due to its ability to effectively kill the malignant cells effectively, without known detrimental effects to normal cells (47) . Given that IL-8 has been shown to be involved in tumor progression and to be present at high levels in ascites of ovarian cancer patients, these malignancies might be further resistant to the use of TRAIL as a therapeutic. Consequently, inhibition of the antiapoptotic role of IL-8, combined with the proapoptotic properties of TRAIL, may provide an effective regimen for inducing apoptosis and eventual use as treatment for ovarian carcinomas. Although TRAIL has been suggested as a prospective therapeutic agent for many malignant tumors, our results suggest that the role that IL-8 may play in blocking the therapeutic capabilities of TRAIL may pose a serious problem for the use of TRAIL to treat ovarian carcinomas. Therefore, it is of considerable interest to identify and characterize the mechanisms that are regulated in response to IL-8 and TRAIL in ovarian cancer. Additional studies to define mechanisms underlying these processes will be crucial in our understanding of these events in carcinogenesis.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grant 2T32 and NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Grant 5 RO1. A preliminary report of this work has been published previously (Abdollahi, T., Robertson, N. M., Abdollahi, A., and Litwack, G. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 43: 701, 2002). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Jefferson Medical College, Bluemle Life Science Building, Suite 550, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Phone: (215) 503-4629; Fax: (215) 503-5393; E-mail: gerry.Litwack{at}mail.tju.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; IL, interleukin; DcR, decoy receptor; DR, death receptor; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling; NFDM, nonfat dry milk; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; AB, antibody. ![]()
Received 5/28/02. Accepted 6/ 2/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B transcription factors protect against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis by up-regulating the TRAIL decoy receptor DcR1. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 27322-27328, 2001.
mitogen-activated protein kinase, a developmentally regulated protein kinase that is activated by stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 7095-7102, 1999.
mitogen-activated protein kinase in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated neutrophils. J. Clin. Investig., 103: 851-858, 1999.[Medline]
: a new member of p38 group of MAP kinases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 228: 334-340, 1996.[Medline]
and p38
by hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 23570-23576, 1999.
cascade in
-radiation-induced cell cycle arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 4543-4552, 2000.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. E. Perez, N. Parquet, K. Shain, R. Nimmanapalli, M. Alsina, C. Anasetti, and W. Dalton Bone Marrow Stroma Confers Resistance to Apo2 Ligand/TRAIL in Multiple Myeloma in Part by Regulating c-FLIP J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1545 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Warke, K. J. Martin, K. Giaya, S. K. Shaw, A. L. Rothman, and I. Bosch TRAIL Is a Novel Antiviral Protein against Dengue Virus J. Virol., January 1, 2008; 82(1): 555 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Qi, J. Tang, M. Loesch, N. Pohl, S. Alkan, and G. Chen p38{gamma} Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Integrates Signaling Crosstalk between Ras and Estrogen Receptor to Increase Breast Cancer Invasion. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7540 - 7547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Gilli, F Marnetto, M Caldano, A Sala, S Malucchi, M Capobianco, and A Bertolotto Biological markers of interferon-beta therapy: comparison among interferon-stimulated genes MxA, TRAIL and XAF-1 Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 47 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscova, D. J. Marsh, and R. C. Baxter Protein Chip Discovery of Secreted Proteins Regulated by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1376 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tang, X. Qi, D. Mercola, J. Han, and G. Chen Essential Role of p38{gamma} in K-Ras Transformation Independent of Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23910 - 23917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Horak, D. Pils, G. Haller, I. Pribill, M. Roessler, S. Tomek, R. Horvat, R. Zeillinger, C. Zielinski, and M. Krainer Contribution of Epigenetic Silencing of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand Receptor 1 (DR4) to TRAIL Resistance and Ovarian Cancer Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 3(6): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Sweeney, S. Mehrotra, M. R. Sadaria, S. Kumar, N. H. Shortle, Y. Roman, C. Sheridan, R. A. Campbell, D. J. Murry, S. Badve, et al. The sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide in combination with docetaxel reduces metastasis and improves survival in a xenograft model of breast cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2005; 4(6): 1004 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Hui, W. Zhang, W. Chen, D. Xi, B. Purow, G. C. Friedman, and H. A. Fine Agents with Selective Estrogen Receptor (ER) Modulator Activity Induce Apoptosis In vitro and In vivo in ER-Negative Glioma Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 9115 - 9123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |