| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH [S. J. V., N. J. C., B. W. D.], and KuDOS Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 4WG [C. J. R., G. C. M. S.], United Kingdom
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3-fold in the proficient cell lines. Furthermore, the inhibitor combination completely abolished PLDR. IR-induced DNA double strand break (DNA DSB) repair was inhibited by both NU7026 and AG14361, and use of the inhibitor combination prevented 90% of DNA DSB rejoining, even 24-h postirradiation. Thus, there was a correlation between the ability of the inhibitors to prevent IR-induced DNA DSB repair and their ability to potentiate cytotoxicity. Thus, individually, or in combination, the DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors act as potent radiosensitizers and show potential as tools for anticancer therapeutic intervention. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two DNA DSB repair pathways in eukaryotes are NHEJ and HRR (1)
. Important components in these repair pathways are the PI 3-K-related protein kinase family of enzymes. These DNA damage-activated serine/threonine protein kinases include DNA-PK, ATM, and ATR (2)
. The DNA-PK holoenzyme comprises a heterodimer of Mr
70,000 and
80,000 polypeptides, known as Ku, which binds to DNA strand breaks, recruiting and activating the Mr 470,000 catalytic subunit, termed DNA-PKcs (3)
. Numerous studies have shown that cells lacking either functional DNA-PKcs or Ku80 through mutation or gene knockout are hypersensitive to IR and cross-linking agents (3, 4, 5, 6)
. DNA-PK, together with the XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex and the recently identified cofactor Artemis, is specifically required for NHEJ (7
, 8)
, with
80% of DNA DSBs repaired by this pathway (9)
.
The first identified inhibitor of the PI 3-K-related protein kinase enzyme family was the fungal metabolite Wortmannin. Although primarily used as a PI 3-K inhibitor, it was also shown to potentiate IR-induced cytotoxicity and inhibit DNA DSB repair at concentrations that inhibit cellular DNA-PK (10, 11, 12, 13) . The recently synthesized molecule NU7026, 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-benzo[h]chomen-4-one, a novel and specific inhibitor of DNA-PK, has been evaluated in this study.
PARP-1 is a Mr 116,000 enzyme that is an important component of the BER complex required for DNA SSB repair (14, 15, 16) . Loss of PARP-1 function, using molecular genetic techniques or inhibition, causes radiosensitization and potentiates the cytotoxicity of monofunctional alkylating agents (17, 18, 19) . Thus, PARP-1 inhibitors are predicted to improve the efficacy of radio and certain types of chemo-therapy. It is generally assumed that the inhibition of BER is the cause of the enhanced cytotoxicity. However, we have recently reported that a PARP-1 inhibitor (NU1025) also inhibits DNA DSB repair in cells exposed to IR, and this may contribute to the cytotoxic mechanism (12) .
Convincing evidence for in vivo radiopotentiation with a PARP-1 inhibitor was obtained using PD128763 (20) . Using a murine tumor model, Leopold and Seebolt-Leopold demonstrated that PD128763+ IR caused a 1015-day increase in growth delay compared with irradiation alone. The clinical potential of this class of agents has led to the development of diverse classes of potent PARP-1 inhibitors (21, 22, 23) . The tricyclic benzamidizole 1-(4-dimethylaminomethyl-phenyl)-8,9-dihydro-7H-2,7,9a-benzo[cd]azulen-6-one) AG14361 has been used in this study (23) .
Radiosensitization by deficiency or inhibition of either DNA-PK or PARP-1 is not limited to proliferating cells. Nonproliferating cells exposed to IR are known to undergo PLDR leading to substantial increases in survival compared with proliferating cells or cells induced to start a proliferative cycle shortly after irradiation (24 , 25) . Several early reports, using either cell lines mutationally inactivated in DNA-PK or PARP-1 inhibitors, showed a reduction in PLDR in nonproliferating (quiescent) cells (26, 27, 28, 29, 30) . Local tumor conditions, such as cell and vascular density, as well as availability of oxygen and nutrients, frequently result in a high fraction of nonproliferating cells. PLDR after irradiation is considered to be an important determinant of radioresistance and has been demonstrated in tumor cell lines and in an experimental tumor model (31, 32, 33) . Thus, the potential of small molecule inhibitors of DNA-PK and PARP-1 to prevent PLDR is an important consideration in the assessment of their therapeutic application.
Here, we describe the biological effects of both AG14361 and NU7026 in cell culture models. We have investigated the ability of these inhibitors, used alone or in combination, to radiosensitize both proliferating and quiescent paired cell lines proficient or deficient in either DNA-PK or PARP-1. In addition, their effects on DNA DSB repair were investigated.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Lines and Culture.
Primary PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1-/- MEFs were a gift from Professor Gilbert de Murcia, École Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, France. Spontaneously immortalized cell lines were derived from the primary MEFs to enable clonogenic survival assays to be performed. It was noted that the immortalized PARP-1+/+ MEFs expressed very high basal levels of p53 protein compared with the PARP-1-/- MEFs, and therefore, the p53 gene was sequenced. It was found that the PARP-1-/- cells had a wt p53 sequence, but the PARP-1+/+ had an Asp to Glu substitution at codon 278 in p53, within a conserved region of the DNA binding domain. This rendered the p53 unable to act as a transcriptional transactivator.4
The significance of the difference in the functional status of p53, with respect to the results obtained, is explored in the "Discussion." The Chinese hamster cell lines V3 (mutated in DNA-PKcs) and V3YAC [V3 transfected with a YAC carrying the complementing human DNA-PKcs gene] were kindly provided by Dr. Penny Jeggo, University of Sussex (34)
.
All cell lines were cultured as monolayers in DMEM medium [supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin]. Glutamine was added at a final concentration of 2 mM. The V3YAC cell line was maintained under antibiotic selection with genticin (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, United Kingdom) at a final concentration of 500 µg/ml to ensure retention of the YAC.
Purified Enzyme Assays.
Mammalian DNA-PK (500 ng/µl) was isolated from HeLa cell nuclear extract after chromatography using Q-Sepharose, S-Sepharose, and Heparin agarose. DNA-PK (250 ng) activity was measured at 30°C, in a final volume of 40 µl, in buffer containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 12.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% v/v Glycerol, 0.1% w/v NP-40, and 1 mg of the substrate GST-p53N66 (the NH2-terminal 66 amino acid residues of human wild-type p53 fused to glutathione S-transferase) in polypropylene 96-well plates. To the assay mix, varying concentrations of inhibitor (in DMSO at a final concentration of 1% v/v) were added. After 10 min of incubation, ATP was added to give a final concentration of 50 µM, along with a 30-mer double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide (final concentration of 0.5 ng/ml), to initiate the reaction. After 1 h with shaking, 150 µl of PBS were added to the reaction, and 5 µl were then transferred to a 96-well opaque white plate containing 45 µl of PBS per well, where the GSTp53N66 substrate was allowed to bind to the wells for 1 h. To detect the phosphorylation event on the serine 15 residue of p53 elicited by DNA-PK, a p53 phosphoserine-15 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) was used in a basic ELISA procedure. An antirabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce) was then used in the ELISA before the addition of chemiluminescence reagent (Renaissance, New England Nuclear) to detect the signal as measured by chemiluminescent counting via a TopCount NXT (Packard).
The protocols used to detect ATM kinase and ATR kinase activities were performed essentially according to the methodologies described previously (35
, 36)
. ATM and ATR were immunoprecipitated using rabbit polyclonal antisera raised to the COOH-terminal 400 amino acids of ATM and antisera raised to amino acids 400480 of ATR, respectively. The PI 3-kinase assay was performed essentially as described previously (37)
, using baculoviral derived recombinant p110
and p85
(a kind gift from Prof. Mike Waterfield, Ludwig Institute, London, United Kingdom).
The IC50s for the compounds in all of the enzymes assays were derived from sigmoidal plots using the graphic package Prism, in which the enzyme activity in the varying concentration of compounds was plotted against the concentration of compound.
Cytotoxicity Assays.
Clonogenic assays were performed as described previously (12)
. Briefly, exponentially growing cells (± AG14361 and/or NU7026) were exposed to IR. Drug(s) were added 60 min before irradiation followed by a 16-h postincubation at 37°C before harvesting and reseeding for colony formation in the absence of drugs. Data were normalized to untreated controls (1% v/v DMSO). PF90 values were calculated from the ratio of the individual LD90 values, i.e., the LD90 divided by LD90 in the presence of inhibitor(s).
PLDR.
The effects of AG14361 and NU7026, alone or in combination, were investigated in growth arrested cells after approximately equitoxic doses of IR. Cells were grown to confluence to induce G1 arrest (G0 status) before irradiation and irradiated in conditioned medium obtained from plateau phase cells. Cell cycle distribution to confirm G1 arrest in plateau phase cells was assessed by flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). Drug(s) were added in conditioned medium 60 min before irradiation. After exposure to IR, cells were trypsinized and reseeded for colony formation in the absence of drugs, either immediately after exposure to IR or after a 24-h postincubation (± AG14361 and/or NU7026) at 37°C.
Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression.
Cell lysates were prepared from exponentially growing cells and loaded onto denaturing polyacrylamide gels using standard protocols. DNA-PKcs was resolved on 38% (w/v) Tris acetate gradient gels and all other proteins on 420% (w/v) Tris glycine gradient gels (Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, United Kingdom). After electrophoresis, proteins were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad, Herts, United Kingdom) and probed for PARP-1 (H-250 rabbit polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and DNA-PKcs (Ab-4 cocktail mouse monoclonal; Stratech Scientific, Cambs, United Kingdom). As a loading control, an antiactin antibody (mouse clone AC-40; Sigma, Dorset, United Kingdom) was used. This was followed by binding of peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse/rabbit antibody and detection of proteins by enhanced chemiluminescence (DAKO, Ely, United Kingdom).
Cell-based Enzyme Activity Assays.
For comparison of enzyme activities in the cell lines, the following techniques were used: DNA-PK was assayed in nuclear extracts. Briefly, DNA was removed from the extracts using high salt elution (fast flow DEAE Sepharose; Amersham Pharmacia, Bucks, United Kingdom). Fifty microgram aliquots were assayed for DNA-PK activity using the SIGNATECT DNA-PK assay system (Promega, Hants, United Kingdom). PARP-1 was assayed by measuring incorporation of radiolabel from [32P] NAD+ into acid precipitable counts in a permeabilized cell system (38)
. Cells were permeabilized using digitonin, and a 30-bp blunt-ended oligonucleotide was used in the assay to maximally activate PARP-1.
DNA Strand-Break Assays.
DNA DSB levels were measured by neutral filter elution (39)
. The radiolabelling, drug treatment, postincubation conditions, and sample preparation used in these experiments were exactly as described by Boulton et al. (11)
. In all experiments, cells were exposed to 75 Gy IR. Cell cultures were preincubated ± AG14361 and/or NU7026 for 60 min before exposure to IR, and the drugs remained in the culture medium during the postincubation periods. Regression analysis of each elution profile was performed to calculate the relative retention, i.e., the fraction of sample DNA retained on the filter when 50% of the internal standard has eluted (40)
. Values for cells treated with IR ± inhibitor(s) were expressed as a percentage of the values of unirradiated controls.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Characterization of Cell Lines.
Western blot analyses were carried out to assess PARP-1 and DNA-PK protein levels in the paired cell lines. As expected (Fig. 2A)
, the PARP-1+/+ cell line exhibited a band at Mr 116,000 (PARP-1), and this was completely absent in the PARP-1-/- cell line. However, both these cell lines showed bands for DNA-PKcs and Ku80 (results not shown). The V3 cell line lacked the Mr 470,000 DNA-PKcs band, but this was restored in the V3YAC cell line (Fig. 2A)
. Both these cell lines showed the Mr 116,000 PARP-1 band (results not shown). DNA-PK and PARP-1 assays were carried out to confirm that the lack of detectable protein in the V3 and PARP-1-/- cells correlated with an absence of the corresponding enzyme activities, to ensure that DNA-PK activity was present in both the PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1-/- cell lines and to ensure that PARP-1 activity was present in both the V3 and V3YAC cell lines (Fig. 2, B and C)
. DNA-PK activity was slightly higher in the V3YAC cell line (750 pmol ATP/mg protein) compared with the PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1-/- cell lines (500 pmol ATP/mg protein for both cell lines; Fig. 2B
). This may reflect overexpression of the human DNA-PKcs by the YAC. As expected, DNA-PK activity was undetectable in the V3 cells. PARP-1 activity was similar in all of the cell lines, apart from the PARP-1-/- cells, which retained 3.9 ± 0.5% residual activity compared with the PARP-1+/+ cells (Fig. 2C)
. This residual activity is likely to be attributable to PARP-2, which, together with PARP-1, has also been implicated in BER (16)
.
|
4-fold more sensitive to IR than their proficient counterparts (note the different IR dose ranges in Fig. 3, A versus B
|
40 µM) nor NU7026 (
50 µM), alone or in combination, reduced clonogenic survival (results not shown). The inhibitors were effective when added immediately before exposure to IR but for convenience were routinely added 1 h before irradiation. Both AG14361 and NU7026 potentiated IR in a concentration-dependent manner, and maximum potentiation was achieved at 10 µM NU7026 and 0.4 µM AG14361 (results not shown). Therefore, these concentrations were used in all subsequent experiments.
The inhibitors used alone, or in combination, potentiated the cytotoxicity of IR in the enzyme proficient exponentially growing V3YAC and PARP-1+/+ cells (Fig. 3, A and C)
. PF90 values were calculated to quantitate the potentiating effects of the inhibitors alone, and in combination, on IR-induced cytotoxicity, and the results are summarized in Table 2
. Approximately additive effects were obtained when the inhibitors were used together (Fig. 3, A and C)
, e.g., the PF90 values for AG14361 and NU7026 in the V3YAC cell line were 1.4 ± 0 and 1.51 ± 0.04, respectively; when used in combination, the PF90 value was 2.78 ± 0.04 (Table 2)
. Significant radiosensitization by AG14361 was observed in all of the cell lines with PARP-1 activity (Fig. 3, AC
; PF90 values 1.31.4) but not in the PARP-1-/- cells (Fig. 3D)
. Similarly, NU7026 caused significant radiosensitization in the DNA-PK proficient cells (Fig. 3, A, C, and D
; PF90 values 1.11.7) but not in the DNA-PK-deficient cell (Fig. 3B)
. These data support the hypothesis that NU7026 and AG14361 mediate potentiation specifically by inhibition of their target enzymes, DNA-PK and PARP-1, respectively.
|
5%. After a 24-h delay in replating, which allows quiescent (G0) cells to repair PLD, the surviving fraction of V3YAC and PARP-1+/+ cells was increased 78-fold (Fig. 4, A and C)
70% by inclusion of AG14361 during the recovery period, whereas NU7026 alone completely abolished PLDR, and the combination of NU7026 and AG14361 reduced survival even further (Fig. 4, A and C)
|
80% rejoined by 60 min (Fig. 5A)
50% DNA DSB rejoined (5, A and B).
|
90% (Fig. 6, A and C)
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ideally, paired cell lines should be isogenic, differing only in the gene of interest. However, this is rarely the case, and it was established during the course of this work that, in contrast to the PARP-1-/- MEFs, which had retained wild-type p53 after spontaneous immortalization, the PARP-1+/+ MEFs had acquired a p53 mutation in the DNA binding domain and did not induce mdm2 in response to IR.4 In consideration of the potential clinical use of DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors, it is pertinent to point out that both inhibitors were able to cause radiosensitization in this cell line, despite the lack of a functional p53. This ability to radiopotentiate cells, regardless of their p53 status, increases the range of tumors for which the use of the inhibitors may be effective.
The observation that both NU7026 and AG14361 not only radiosensitize proliferating cells but also prevent PLDR in quiescent cells is very important. PLDR is a significant factor in determining tumor responses to radiotherapy (reviewed in Ref. 41 ). Evidence for PLDR in the nonproliferating compartment of tumors is very sparse, but experimental and clinical observations suggest that the rapid repopulation after IR-induced killing of the proliferating compartment of tumors results from recruitment of surviving G0 cells into the proliferative cycle.
Both inhibitors used alone substantially prevented PLDR. More dramatically, when used in combination, AG14361 and NU7026 not only completely abolished PLDR but reduced survival significantly below that obtained in cells exposed to IR alone and replated immediately (i.e., no 24-h recovery period), e.g., when quiescent V3YAC cells were irradiated, survival was reduced to 0.38% if the cells were replated immediately. Survival was increased to 3.3% by a 24-h delay in replating, but the presence of AG14361 and NU7026 during the 24-h delay reduced survival to 0.064%, even lower than the cells which were replated immediately post-IR. This extremely potent radiosensitization (
50-fold) of nonproliferating cells by the combined use of the NU7026 and AG14361 is one of the major aims of radiobiologists and radiotherapists alike. Current interest in clinical rediosensitization has focused on hypoxic radiosensitizers and chemical radiosensitizers, such as the halogenated pyrimidine analogues (42, 43, 44)
, whereas the potential of PLDR inhibitors has largely been ignored. These data point to inhibition of PLDR as a tool for clinical radiosensitization that merits further investigation.
PARP-1 inhibition clearly results in higher levels of IR-induced DNA DSBs, but these data do not prove a direct role for PARP-1 in NHEJ. IR-induced clustered damage involves, e.g., near neighbor base oxidation and hydrolysis of the phosphodiester backbone on opposite DNA strands (45) . BER at these sites will generate DNA SSB intermediates. Absence or inhibition of PARP-1 by preventing BER-mediated strand rejoining by ligase IV (46 , 47) may result in the longer lived DNA SSBs converting to DNA DSBs, rather than by directly inhibiting NHEJ.
A number of lines of evidence indicate that although DNA-PKcs highly stimulates the NHEJ pathway, in its absence, a slower repair pathway still operates (9
, 48)
. The slower component of repair is probably mediated by DNA-PKcs-independent NHEJ but may also involve HRR, which requires a complex of DNA repair proteins, including RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, XRCC2, and ATM (1)
. Both the slow component of NHEJ and HRR are considered to act independently of DNA-PKcs and PARP-1. It was therefore a striking observation that even 24-h postirradiation, the use of the inhibitors resulted in a reduction in the percentage of DNA DSBs rejoined. In particular, a profound effect on DNA DSB repair was observed in the V3YAC cells with the combined use of the inhibitors at 24 h, where only
10% of DNA DSBs had rejoined, compared with >95% of the control (Fig. 6A)
. DNA DSBs are considered to be the most cytotoxic lesion that cells encounter, and this almost complete and long-term abrogation of DNA DSB repair by the combined use of the inhibitors would easily explain their potent radiosensitizing effects in both proliferating and growth arrested cells. These data also indicate that the combined inhibition of PARP-1 and DNA-PK has downstream effects on the slow component of DNA DSB repair. One possible mechanism, which is suggested by the data, is that the inhibited enzymes have more deleterious consequences for DNA DSB repair (and hence survival) than the lack of enzymes. DNA-PK and PARP-1 bind avidly to DNA DSBs, and automodification by phosphorylation and poly(ADP-ribosylation), respectively, is essential for dissociation of these enzymes from the DNA (49
, 50)
. Furthermore, Wortmannin has been demonstrated to block DNA-PK at DNA ends and prevents their processing by either DNA polymerization, degradation, or ligation (51)
. Similarly, NU7026 and AG14361, by inhibiting the automodification reactions of their target enzymes, are predicted to tether the enzymes irreversibly to the DNA ends. These protein-bound DNA termini could hinder assembly of the enzyme complexes required for the successful execution of NHEJ and HRR.
A number of publications demonstrate interaction and/or cooperation between DNA-PK and PARP-1. Both enzymes have been shown to have high affinities for binding to DNA DSBs (52) . Modulation of enzyme activity by poly(ADP-ribosylation) of DNA-PK by PARP-1 and phosphorylation of PARP-1 by DNA-PK has also been demonstrated, suggesting reciprocal regulation of enzyme activity (53 , 54) . Finally, an intimate association between PARP-1 and Ku has been demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation studies (55) . These observations point to an, as yet, poorly understood functional association of the two enzymes in response to DNA damage.
Increased DNA-PK activity has been widely demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo and correlates with the resistance of tumor cells to IR and bifunctional alkylating agents (56, 57, 58, 59) . Conversely, acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents has been shown to correlate with increased DNA-PK activity (60, 61, 62) . Therefore, increased DNA-PK activity has been proposed as a novel cellular and tumor resistance mechanism. Such tumor-specific alterations are likely to be important in terms of therapeutic exploitation. Where DNA-PK is overexpressed, the use of a selective inhibitor is predicted to allow treatment of these tumors which would otherwise be radio and chemoresistant. The effects of NU7026 in model systems with increased DNA-PK activity merits further investigation. Whether there will be a therapeutic gain associated with the use of DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors remains to be established, and an in vivo evaluation using human tumor xenografts in nude mice is planned.
In four recent reports, antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and a COOH-terminal peptide which targets Ku80 and prevents DNA-PKcs binding to Ku have been used to selectively deplete or inhibit DNA-PK function in human cell lines (63, 64, 65, 66) . Loss of DNA-PK activity correlated with radiosensitization, increased mutation, and inhibition of DNA damage repair. Our results, the first to use a selective small molecule inhibitor of DNA-PK, are consistent with these data which highlight the current high interest in this enzyme as a target for radio and chemotherapeutic modulation. A PARP-1 inhibitor is currently entering Phase I clinical trials under the auspices of Cancer Research United Kingdom, and the evidence presented here indicates that the combination of this inhibitor with a DNA-PK inhibitor could prove a powerful chemotherapeutic strategy.
In conclusion, the data presented here suggest that pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK and PARP-1, both alone and in conjunction, represents a promising strategy for tumor radiosensitization.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Cancer Research UK and Pfizer GRD (San Diego, CA). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Northern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 191 222 7133; Fax: 44 (0) 191 222 7556; E-mail: b.w.durkacz{at}newcastle.ac.uk ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: DSB, double strand break; ATM, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase; DNA-PKcs, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; LD90, dose of ionizing radiation that causes 90% cell kill; ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase; BER, base excision repair; DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; HRR, homologous recombination repair; IR, ionizing radiation; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1; PF90, potentiation factor at 90% cell kill; PI 3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PLDR, potentially lethal damage recovery; SSB, single-strand break; YAC, yeast artificial chomosome. ![]()
4 P. A. Jowsey, unpublished results. ![]()
Received 4/ 7/03. Revised 6/11/03. Accepted 7/ 9/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
intepe L., Durkacz B. W. Wortmannin is a potent inhibitor of DNA double strand break repair but not single strand break repair in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 2285-2290, 1996.
-rays and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Lett., 123: 227-232, 1998.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Bauerschmidt, C. Arrichiello, S. Burdak-Rothkamm, M. Woodcock, M. A. Hill, D. L. Stevens, and K. Rothkamm Cohesin promotes the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in replicated chromatin Nucleic Acids Res., November 11, 2009; (2009) gkp976v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Stephan, C. Concannon, E. Kremmer, M. P. Carty, and H.-P. Nasheuer Ionizing radiation-dependent and independent phosphorylation of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A during mitosis Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(18): 6028 - 6041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mukherjee, B. McEllin, C. V. Camacho, N. Tomimatsu, S. Sirasanagandala, S. Nannepaga, K. J. Hatanpaa, B. Mickey, C. Madden, E. Maher, et al. EGFRvIII and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: A Molecular Mechanism for Radioresistance in Glioblastoma Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 69(10): 4252 - 4259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sak, S. Grehl, M. Engelhard, A. Wierlemann, H.-P. Kaelberlah, P. Erichsen, C. Pottgen, M. Groneberg, and M. Stuschke Long-Term In vivo Effects of Cisplatin on {gamma}-H2AX Foci Signaling in Peripheral Lymphocytes of Tumor Patients After Irradiation Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 15(8): 2927 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Williams, R. Klingler, B. Ponnaiya, T. Hardt, E. Schrock, S. P. Lees-Miller, K. Meek, R. L. Ullrich, and S. M. Bailey Telomere Dysfunction and DNA-PKcs Deficiency: Characterization and Consequence Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 69(5): 2100 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Chanoux, B. Yin, K. A. Urtishak, A. Asare, C. H. Bassing, and E. J. Brown ATR and H2AX Cooperate in Maintaining Genome Stability under Replication Stress J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2009; 284(9): 5994 - 6003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quanz, N. Berthault, C. Roulin, M. Roy, A. Herbette, C. Agrario, C. Alberti, V. Josserand, J.-L. Coll, X. Sastre-Garau, et al. Small-Molecule Drugs Mimicking DNA Damage: A New Strategy for Sensitizing Tumors to Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1308 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Durkin, X. Guo, K. A. Fryrear, V. T. Mihaylova, S. K. Gupta, S. M. Belgnaoui, A. Haoudi, G. M. Kupfer, and O. J. Semmes HTLV-1 Tax Oncoprotein Subverts the Cellular DNA Damage Response via Binding to DNA-dependent Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2008; 283(52): 36311 - 36320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Medhurst, D. O. Warmerdam, I. Akerman, E. H. Verwayen, R. Kanaar, V. A. J. Smits, and N. D. Lakin ATR and Rad17 collaborate in modulating Rad9 localisation at sites of DNA damage J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2008; 121(23): 3933 - 3940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Blickwedehl, M. Agarwal, C. Seong, R. K. Pandita, T. Melendy, P. Sung, T. K. Pandita, and N. Bangia Role for proteasome activator PA200 and postglutamyl proteasome activity in genomic stability PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16165 - 16170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, Y. Shi, R. Guan, C. Donawho, Y. Luo, J. Palma, G.-d. Zhu, E. F. Johnson, L. E. Rodriguez, N. Ghoreishi-Haack, et al. Potentiation of Temozolomide Cytotoxicity by Poly(ADP)Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor ABT-888 Requires a Conversion of Single-Stranded DNA Damages to Double-Stranded DNA Breaks Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 6(10): 1621 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Burdak-Rothkamm, K. Rothkamm, and K. M. Prise ATM Acts Downstream of ATR in the DNA Damage Response Signaling of Bystander Cells Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7059 - 7065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Shank, J. B. Kelley, D. Gioeli, C.-S. Yang, A. Spencer, L. A. Allison, and B. M. Paschal Activation of the DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Stimulates Nuclear Export of the Androgen Receptor in Vitro J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10568 - 10580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J.H. Arlander, B. T. Greene, C. L. Innes, and R. S. Paules DNA Protein Kinase Dependent G2 Checkpoint Revealed following Knockdown of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 89 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-Y. Wu, P. Frit, L. Malivert, P. Revy, D. Biard, B. Salles, and P. Calsou Interplay between Cernunnos-XLF and Nonhomologous End-joining Proteins at DNA Ends in the Cell J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 31937 - 31943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. O. Fisher, H. Hochegger, S. Takeda, and K. W. Caldecott Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Accelerates Single-Strand Break Repair in Concert with Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(15): 5597 - 5605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Bentle, K. E. Reinicke, Y. Dong, E. A. Bey, and D. A. Boothman Nonhomologous End Joining Is Essential for Cellular Resistance to the Novel Antitumor Agent, {beta}-Lapachone Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6936 - 6945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hinz, P. B. Nham, S. S. Urbin, I. M. Jones, and L. H. Thompson Disparate contributions of the Fanconi anemia pathway and homologous recombination in preventing spontaneous mutagenesis Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3733 - 3740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Amrein, M. Loignon, A.-C. Goulet, M. Dunn, B. Jean-Claude, R. Aloyz, and L. Panasci Chlorambucil Cytotoxicity in Malignant B Lymphocytes Is Synergistically Increased by 2-(Morpholin-4-yl)-benzo[h]chomen-4-one (NU7026)-Mediated Inhibition of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair via Inhibition of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 848 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Albert, C. Cao, K. W. Kim, C. D. Willey, L. Geng, D. Xiao, H. Wang, A. Sandler, D. H. Johnson, A. D. Colevas, et al. Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Enhances Cell Death and Improves Tumor Growth Delay in Irradiated Lung Cancer Models Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 3033 - 3042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Donawho, Y. Luo, Y. Luo, T. D. Penning, J. L. Bauch, J. J. Bouska, V. D. Bontcheva-Diaz, B. F. Cox, T. L. DeWeese, L. E. Dillehay, et al. ABT-888, an Orally Active Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor that Potentiates DNA-Damaging Agents in Preclinical Tumor Models Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2007; 13(9): 2728 - 2737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ratnam and J. A. Low Current Development of Clinical Inhibitors of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Oncology Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1383 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Drouet, P. Frit, C. Delteil, J.-P. de Villartay, B. Salles, and P. Calsou Interplay between Ku, Artemis, and the DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit at DNA Ends J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27784 - 27793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhao, H. D. Thomas, M. A. Batey, I. G. Cowell, C. J. Richardson, R. J. Griffin, A. H. Calvert, D. R. Newell, G. C.M. Smith, and N. J. Curtin Preclinical Evaluation of a Potent Novel DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Inhibitor NU7441. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5354 - 5362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhu and N. J. Gooderham Mechanisms of Induction of Cell Cycle Arrest and Cell Death by Cryptolepine in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma A549 Cells Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2006; 91(1): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Noel, C. Godon, M. Fernet, N. Giocanti, F. Megnin-Chanet, and V. Favaudon Radiosensitization by the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide is specific of the S phase of the cell cycle and involves arrest of DNA synthesis. Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 564 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Smith, E. Willmore, C. A. Austin, and N. J. Curtin The Novel Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, AG14361, Sensitizes Cells to Topoisomerase I Poisons by Increasing the Persistence of DNA Strand Breaks Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8449 - 8457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Boo, H. H. Lin, V. Chung, B. Zhou, S. G. Louie, M. A. O'Reilly, Y. Yen, and D. K. Ann High Mobility Group A2 Potentiates Genotoxic Stress in Part through the Modulation of Basal and DNA Damage-Dependent Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Related Protein Kinase Activation Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6622 - 6630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Datta, R. D. Neumann, and T. A. Winters Characterization of complex apurinic/apyrimidinic-site clustering associated with an authentic site-specific radiation-induced DNA double-strand break PNAS, July 26, 2005; 102(30): 10569 - 10574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Hadjipanayis and N. A. DeLuca Inhibition of DNA Repair by a Herpes Simplex Virus Vector Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Human Glioblastoma Cells Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5310 - 5316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Deriano, O. Guipaud, H. Merle-Beral, J.-L. Binet, M. Ricoul, G. Potocki-Veronese, V. Favaudon, Z. Maciorowski, C. Muller, B. Salles, et al. Human chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells can escape DNA damage-induced apoptosis through the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway Blood, June 15, 2005; 105(12): 4776 - 4783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li and D. F. Stern Regulation of CHK2 by DNA-dependent Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 12041 - 12050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Audebert, B. Salles, and P. Calsou Involvement of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA Ligase III in an Alternative Route for DNA Double-strand Breaks Rejoining J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55117 - 55126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hickson, Y. Zhao, C. J. Richardson, S. J. Green, N. M. B. Martin, A. I. Orr, P. M. Reaper, S. P. Jackson, N. J. Curtin, and G. C. M. Smith Identification and Characterization of a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase ATM Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 9152 - 9159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Espejel, P. Klatt, J. M.-d. Murcia, J. Martin-Caballero, J. M. Flores, G. Taccioli, G. de Murcia, and M. A. Blasco Impact of telomerase ablation on organismal viability, aging, and tumorigenesis in mice lacking the DNA repair proteins PARP-1, Ku86, or DNA-PKcs J. Cell Biol., November 22, 2004; 167(4): 627 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Willmore, S. de Caux, N. J. Sunter, M. J. Tilby, G. H. Jackson, C. A. Austin, and B. W. Durkacz A novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, NU7026, potentiates the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase II poisons used in the treatment of leukemia Blood, June 15, 2004; 103(12): 4659 - 4665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Oliver, J.-C. Ame, S. M. Roe, V. Good, G. de Murcia, and L. H. Pearl Crystal structure of the catalytic fragment of murine poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 Nucleic Acids Res., January 22, 2004; 32(2): 456 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |