
[Cancer Research 63, 6763-6771, October 15, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research
Constitutive Activation of Stat5b Contributes to Carcinogenesis in Vivo
Sichuan Xi,
Qing Zhang,
William E. Gooding,
Thomas E. Smithgall and
Jennifer Rubin Grandis1
Departments of Otolaryngology [S. X., J. R. G.], Pharmacology [Q. Z., J. R. G.], and Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry [T. E. S.], University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute [W. E. G.], Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The development of more effective prevention and treatment strategies for solid tumors is limited by an incomplete understanding of the critical growth pathways that are activated in carcinogenesis. Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) proteins have been linked to transformation and tumor progression. Studies to date have not elucidated clear and distinct roles for Stat5genes (Stat5a and Stat5b) in human epithelial cancers. We analyzed the role of Stat5a/b isoforms in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck using expression and activation studies in human tissues and in a xenograft model after selective targeting. In a xenograft model, blockade of Stat5b, but not Stat5a, using antisense oligonucleotides resulted in tumor growth inhibition and abrogation of Stat5 target genes in vivo. Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor resulted in partial abrogation of Stat5 activation, thus linking epidermal growth factor receptor to Stat5 in vivo. In tissues from 33 individuals with head and neck cancer, Stat5 activation levels were correlated with progression to a malignant phenotype, where increased expression and phosphorylation of Stat5b were detected consistently in tumors compared with their epithelial counterparts. Thus, constitutive activation of Stat5b contributes to squamous cell tumorigenesis and may serve as a therapeutic target.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Cumulative evidence supports a role for activation of STATs2
in oncogenesis as reflected by elevated STAT-DNA binding activity in a variety of primary tumor specimens and cell lines (1
, 2) . Several potential mechanisms of STAT activation have been implicated in human cancer cells including activation of upstream receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the EGFR, as well as nonreceptor kinases. Autocrine stimulation of EGFR results in receptor dimerization, phosphorylation, and recruitment of STATs to tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain. Interaction between STAT protein src-homology 2 domains and the activated EGFR leads to STAT phosphorylation, dimerization, and nuclear translocation. In the nucleus, STAT dimers bind to target gene promoters and regulate gene expression (3, 4, 5, 6)
. Seven STAT genes have been identified: Stat1, -2, -3, -4, -5a, -5b, and -6. Constitutive activation of STATs 1, 3, and 5 has been demonstrated in a variety of diverse human tumor cell lines. In general, STATs 3 and 5 are involved in the development and progression of cancers, whereas Stat1 demonstrates a tumor suppressor function (2)
.
To date, Stat5 activation has been demonstrated primarily in hematopoietic malignancies where Stat5 activation is associated with specific genetic abnormalities, such as the Bcr-Ablfusion protein in chronic myelogenous leukemia (7)
. A variety of cytokines and growth factors have been reported to stimulate Stat5 activation, including EGF. Like Stat3, Stat5 has been shown to regulate proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis in cancer cells. A constitutively active Stat5 mutant induced properties characteristic of transformed cells (8)
. However, previous studies have generally not distinguished Stat5a and Stat5b in carcinogenesis, and there are no reports of Stat5 activation in epithelial tumor specimens. Stat5a and Stat5b are derived from distinct, yet closely linked genes on chromosome 11 and exhibit 93% identity at the amino acid level. Stat5a/b demonstrate similar patterns of expression, and are activated by the same cytokines and growth factors. The association of Stat5 with transformation and tumor progression suggests that Stat5 may play a role in human carcinogenesis.
Early genetic changes that contribute to carcinogenesis can be detected in the histologically normal mucosa in SCCHN patients. This "condemned mucosa" is subjected to field cancerization by carcinogenic agents (e.g., tobacco and alcohol), predisposing SCCHN patients to the development of multiple primary tumors (9
, 10)
. Overexpression of the EGFR and its autocrine ligand, TGF-
, has been detected in transformed squamous epithelium, adjacent histologically normal epithelium from SCCHN patients, as well as in premalignant dysplastic lesions, compared with levels in control mucosa from patients without cancer, suggesting that this pathway is activated early in SCCHN carcinogenesis (11, 12, 13)
. Dysregulation of TGF-
/EGFR appears to be primarily a result of transcriptional activation and not gene amplication or prolongation of mRNA half-life (14)
. The detection of increased expression of EGFR and activation of Stat3 in this "at risk" mucosa from head and neck cancer patients implicates EGFR-mediated STAT activation as an early event in SCCHN carcinogenesis (15)
.
The vast majority of cancers that arise in the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract (>90%) are squamous cell carcinomas. The development of SCCHN has been linked to carcinogen exposure, generally tobacco and alcohol, as well as to genetic alterations in the affected tissues. Early genetic changes that contribute to SCCHN carcinogenesis can be detected in the histologically normal-appearing mucosa in the area of "field cancerization." Such a broad mucosal diathesis in these patients is supported by the high frequency of multiple primary tumors. Patients who survive the initial SCCHN tumor will most likely succumb to a second primary tumor of the aerodigestive tract. Identification of the critical signaling pathways will facilitate the design of novel prevention and treatment strategies. The present study was undertaken to determine the role of Stat5 activation in SCCHN tumorigenesis and test the hypothesis that Stat5 isoforms could serve as therapeutic targets.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Tissues and Cells.
Samples of squamous cell carcinoma and normal mucosa distant from the tumor (generally, several centimeters away) were obtained from 33 subjects undergoing primary surgical resection for head and neck cancer at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 1998 to 2001 (Table 1)
. Samples of normal oropharyngeal mucosa were obtained from ten gender and age-matched (±5 years) control subjects without cancer undergoing nononcological surgical procedures, such as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Tissues were collected under the auspices of an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol with informed consent obtained from all of the subjects. For the xenograft studies, we used the cell lines OSC-19 (16)
or 1483 (17)
, which are well-characterized SCCHN cell lines that can form tumors in athymic nude mice. In culture, they were maintained in supplemented DMEM as described previously (16)
. Sf-9 cells (Invitrogen) and Sf-9 cells transfected with Stat5a or Stat5b were cultured in Graces complete insect cell medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 50 µg/ml gentamicin as described previously (18)
.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of 33 head and neck cancer patients evaluated prospectively for Stat5 activation/expression
|
|
EMSA and Quantitation.
Nuclear extracts were prepared and EMSAs were performed on 4% native polyacrylamide gels as described (19
, 20)
. Complementary duplex oligonucleotides were synthesized based on the published sequences of STAT DNA-binding elements with the addition of GGGG at the 5' termini to allow radiolabeling as described previously (ß-casein promoter: 5'-AGATTTCTAGGAATTCAAATC-3'; 21
). For supershift experiments, extracts were preincubated with Stat5a polyclonal antibody (L-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or Stat5b polyclonal antibody (N-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Stat5 activation levels were determined by running a positive control SCCHN cell line on each gel. Gel shift bands were quantitated by densitometry and the Molecular Analyst software (AlphaDigidoc 1000; Alpho-Innotech) with normalization of each valve to the positive control on that gel as described by us previously for Stat3 activation determinations (15)
.
Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation.
Whole cell extracts were mixed with 2x SDS sample buffer [125 mmol/liter Tris-HCL (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 10% 2 mercaptoethanol] at 1:1 ratio and were heated for 5 min at 100°C. Proteins (50 µg/lane) were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (MSI, Westboro, MA). Prestained molecular weight markers (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) were included in each gel. Membranes were blocked for 30 min in TBST and 5% BSA. After blocking, membranes were incubated with a primary antibody, rabbit antihuman Stat5a or Stat5b polyclonal antibodies (Transduction Labs, Lexington, KY), or rabbit antihuman Cyclin D1 polyclonal antibody or mouse antihuman Bcl-xL monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), in TBST and 1% BSA. After washing the membranes three times with TBST (5 min each), they were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in TBST and 1% BSA for 30 min. Subsequently, membranes were washed three times with TBST and developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Life Sciences Inc., Arlington Heights, IL). Stat5 activation was determined by immunoblotting with a phosphospecific antibody that cannot distinguish Stat5a from Stat5b (Upstate Biotechnology). Stat5a or Stat5b phosphorylation was determined by immunoprecipitation with antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (PY20; Transduction Laboratories, Inc.), followed by immunoblotting with anti- Stat5a or Stat5b (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY). Interaction of Stat5a or Stat5b with EGFR was determined by immunoprecipitation with anti-EGFR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Stat5a or Stat5b antibodies, followed by immunoblotting with anti-Stat5a or Stat5b antisera.
Animal Studies.
Female athymic nude mice
/
(46 weeks old; 20 ± 2 g; Harlan-Sprague Dawley) were implanted with 1 x 106 cells (OSC-19 or 1483) into the right and left flank with a 26-gauge needle/1-ml tuberculin syringe. Ten days later, when the tumor nodules were established (
2 x 2 mm in diameter), the tumor implanted on one flank was treated with Stat5b antisense oligonucleotides, and the tumor on the contralateral flank was treated with Stat5b sense oligonucleotides, Stat5a antisense oligonucleotides, or no treatment. Antisense oligonucleotides were injected on days 1115, 1822, and 2529. There were 57 mice in each treatment group. For the EGFR antisense gene therapy studies, the tumor on one flank was treated with intratumoral injection of EGFR antisense DNA (25 µg three times a week). The tumor on the contralateral flank was treated with the same dose of EGFR sense DNA as described previously. Phosphorothioated 21-mer oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized on an Applied Biosystem 394 synthesizer by ß-cyanothylphysphoramidite chemistry to minimize degradation of the oligonucleotides by endogenous nucleases. The antisense oligonucleotides were directed against the translation start site (AUG codon) and surrounding nucleotides of the human Stat5a or Stat5b genes. The Stat5a antisense oligonucleotide sequence was 5' TGA ACG GCC ATG GCG GGC TGG 3' and the corresponding sense oligonucleotide sequence was 5' CCA GCC CGC CAT GGC GCT TCA 3'. The Stat5b antisense oligonucleotide sequence was 5' CCA CAC AGC CAT GTT TAC CCG 3' and the corresponding sense oligonucleotide sequence was 5' CGG GTA AAC ATG GCT GTG TGG 3'. Intratumoral injection of antisense oligonucleotides (7.92 nM or 50 µg) in a volume of 50 µl was delivered five times per week for a total of 15 treatments. Tumor volumes were measured in conjunction with each treatment and calculated as length x (width)2/2. Mice were sacrificed after the last treatment, and tumors were harvested for analysis. Experiments were repeated twice to ensure reproducibility. Animal care was in strict compliance with institutional guidelines established by the University of Pittsburgh, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [National Academy of Sciences (1996)], and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.
Statistics.
Comparisons of Stat5 expression, phosphorylation, and activation levels among tissue types were conducted using a two-sample t test. Tumor growth experiments compared the tumor volume in one flank to the paired tumor volume in the opposite flank with the signed rank test.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Increased Stat5 Activation in SCCHN Carcinogenesis.
We reported previously that Stat3 is activated in both tumor and corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with levels in control mucosa from individuals without cancer (15)
. To determine Stat5 activation in SCCHN and control tissues, nuclear extracts were prepared from 33 SCCHN and control tissues and analyzed for Stat5 activation by EMSA using the ß-casein response element (see Table 1
for patient characteristics). Repeat EMSA analysis was performed on a subset of samples, and the variability was found to be <10% (data not shown). DNA binding of Stat5 was found to be 3-fold higher in tumors and 1.8-fold higher in normal mucosa from cancer subjects (harvested several centimeters away from the tumor) compared with normal mucosa from noncancer subjects (P = 0.000523 and P = 0.017, respectively). In addition, the level of Stat5 activation in the tumors was 1.7-fold higher in the SCCHN tumors compared with levels in the corresponding normal mucosa from the same SCCHN patients (P = 0.000135). Because it is not possible to distinguish Stat5a from Stat5b activation on gel shift assay, we performed supershift analysis to confirm that the constitutive Stat5 complexes contained both Stat5a and Stat5b isoforms. Immunoblotting with a phosphospecific Stat5 antibody was performed to confirm the increased Stat5 activation levels in SCCHN tissues detected by gel shift (Fig. 1)
.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Constitutive Stat5 activation in normal mucosa and tumors from SCCHN patients. A, nuclear extracts (20 µg) were prepared from representative tumors (T13) and normal mucosa samples (N13) from SCCHN patients, as well as normal mucosa biopsies from patients without cancer (C13). EMSA was performed with radiolabeled ß-casein duplex oligonucleotide (5'-AGATTTCTAGGAATTCAAATC-3'). Immunoblotting was performed with phosphospecific Stat5 antisera or Stat5 antisera followed by actin as control for loading. B, cumulative results of Stat5 activation levels in 10 control and 33 pairs of SCCHN tissues showing increased constitutive Stat5 activation in tumors compared with normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (P = 0.000135). In addition, Stat5 activation is elevated in tumors compared with normal mucosa from control patients (P = 0.000523) and in normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with normal mucosa from patients without cancer (P = 0.017). C, EMSA was performed using extracts of a representative SCCHN tumor and corresponding normal mucosa compared with control mucosa from a patient without cancer. Extracts were preincubated with antibody to Stat5a or Stat5b or no antibody as indicated. The supershift complexes are indicated on the right.
|
|
Elevated Expression and Phosphorylation of Stat5b, but not Stat5a, in SCCHN Carcinogenesis.
To determine the relative contribution of Stat5a and Stat5b to SCCHN carcinogenesis, we performed immunoblotting studies using antisera specific for each Stat5 isoform. These experiments demonstrated a 2.4-fold increase in Stat5b expression in both SCCHN tumors compared with control mucosa from individuals without cancer (P = 0.000357), as well as a 1.6-fold increase of Stat5b expression levels in normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with control mucosa from unaffected individuals (P = 0.013). In addition, Stat5b expression was elevated 1.5-fold in SCCHN tumors compared with levels in normal mucosa from the same subjects (P = 0.000446). Because phosphospecific antisera that distinguish Stat5a from Stat5b are not available, to determine Stat5a/b phosphorylation levels, coimmunoprecipitation was performed on a subset of samples where there was sufficient clinical material for analysis. As shown in Fig. 2
, Stat5b phosphorylation was only detected in SCCHN tumors and was not found in the corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients or control mucosa from subjects without cancer. In contrast, expression levels of Stat5a and phosphorylated Stat5a in SCCHN tumors was comparable with the levels detected in normal mucosa from SCCHN subjects, as well as in normal mucosa from patients without cancer (Fig. 3)
.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Stat5b expression and activation in SCCHN and control tissues. A, immunoblotting for total Stat5b protein using extracts (50 µg) from representative SCCHN tumors (T13), corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (N13), and control mucosa from patients without cancer (C13). B, cumulative results of Stat5b expression in tissues from 33 SCCHN patients and 10 control patients without cancer. Stat5b expression is elevated in the tumors compared with levels in corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (P = 0.000446). In addition, Stat5b expression is elevated in tumors compared with levels in normal mucosa from patients without cancer (P = 0.000357), and in normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with levels in normal mucosa from noncancer patients (P = 0.013). C, representative coimmunoprecipitation showing phosphorylated Stat5b expression levels in representative tumors (T13), normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (N13), and control mucosa from patients without cancer (C13). D, cumulative results of expression of phosphorylated Stat5b in these tissues. Extracts were precipitated with antiphosphotyrosine PY20 and immunoblotted with anti-Stat5b antisera
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Stat5a expression and activation in SCCHN and control tissues. A, immunoblotting for total Stat5a protein using extracts (50 µg) from representative SCCHN tumors (T13), corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (N13), and control mucosa from patients without cancer (C13). B, cumulative results of Stat5a expression in tissues from 33 SCCHN patients and 10 control patients without cancer. Stat5a expression is similar in the tumors compared with levels in corresponding normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (P = 0.6215). In addition, Stat5a expression is similar in tumors compared with levels in normal mucosa from patients without cancer (P = 0.7457), and in normal mucosa from SCCHN patients compared with levels in normal mucosa from noncancer patients (P = 0.4032). C, representative coimmunoprecipitation showing phosphorylated Stat5a expression levels in representative tumors (T13), normal mucosa from SCCHN patients (N13), and control mucosa from patients without cancer (C13). D, cumulative results of expression of phosphorylated Stat5a in these samples. Extracts were precipitated with antiphosphotyrosine PY20 and immunoblotted with anti-Stat5a antisera.
|
|
Stat5 Activation Is Linked to EGFR Stimulation in Vivo.
SCCHN cell lines and tissues are characterized by overexpression of EGFR where EGFR levels correlate with survival (11
, 22)
. Stat5b activation by EGF was reported to require overexpression of EGFR (23)
. To determine the link between EGFR and Stat5 in vivo, xenografts were established in nude mice using a well-characterized SCCHN cell line, as described previously (24)
. In this model, the EGFR antisense (or control sense) construct was generated by cloning a relatively short sequence (40 bp) corresponding with the ATG start site of the human EGFR gene, into a U6 expression construct. Ten days later, when the tumor nodules were established (
2 x 2 mm in diameter), the tumor implanted on one flank was treated with EGFR antisense DNA and the tumor on the contralateral flank with EGFR sense DNA. Tumors were harvested after the last treatment, and Stat5 activation levels were determined by EMSA. As shown in Fig. 4
A, tumors treated with EGFR antisense DNA demonstrated decreased Stat5 activation levels (as determined by EMSA or immunoblotting) compared with tumors treated with EGFR sense DNA, thus linking Stat5 activation, in part, to EGFR stimulation in vivo.
EGFR has been reported to associate with STATs in cultured epithelial cells (25
, 26)
. In such a model, direct interaction between STAT protein SH2 domains and the activated receptor leads to STAT phosphorylation followed by dimerization of the STAT protein and translocation to the nucleus. In the nucleus, STATs bind to DNA-response elements in promoters, thus regulating growth factor/cytokine-dependent gene expression. To determine whether EGFR formed a complex with Stat5a/b in SCCHN cells, we performed coimmunoprecipitation assays and found that EGFR can interact with either Stat5a or Stat5b (Fig. 4B)
. Therefore, EGFR-mediated Stat5 activation may occur, in part, via direct interaction between the tyrosine kinase domain of the receptor and SH2 domain of Stat5a/b.
Targeting Stat5b, but not Stat5a, Inhibits Tumor Growth and Target Gene Expression in Vivo.
We reported recently that blocking Stat5b, but not Stat5a, using either dominant-negative or antisense strategies inhibited the growth of SCCHN cells in vitro (27)
. The detection of elevated Stat5b phosphorylation exclusively in SCCHN tumor specimens suggests that Stat5b may play a critical role in the progression of head and neck cancer. To determine the consequences of down-modulating Stat5b in vivo, we treated established SCCHN xenografts with antisense oligonucleotides targeting the translation start site of Stat5b as described previously (27)
. Controls included Stat5b oligonucleotides in the sense orientation, antisense oligonucleotides targeting the translation start site of Stat5a, or no treatment. Three groups of mice were randomly selected to receive 25 µg of Stat5b antisense oligonucleotides injected into each established tumor five times a week. Injections were administered on days 1115, 1822, and 2529 after tumor implantation. As shown in Fig. 5
, tumor volumes were consistently lower in the tumors that received Stat5b antisense oligonucleotides compared with tumors treated with corresponding Stat5b sense oligonucleotides or Stat5a antisense oligonucleotides. Similar results were obtained using two other SCCHN xenograft models (data not shown). After the last treatment, mice were sacrificed and tumors harvested for analysis. Western blotting of tumor lysates revealed decreased expression of Stat5a or Stat5b in the respective antisense-treated tumors demonstrating down-modulation of the specific Stat5 isoform being targeted (Fig. 6A)
. The specificity of the treatments was additionally demonstrated by immunoblotting, which showed that Stat5b antisense treatment did not decrease Stat5a expression, nor did Stat5a antisense treatment block expression of Stat5b protein. STATs, including Stat5, have been shown to exert their effects by modulation of gene expression. Stat5 response elements have been identified in several genes, including bcl-xL and cyclin D1 (28)
. Analysis of the tumor lysates demonstrated that expression of both Bcl-xL and Cyclin D1 were decreased in Stat5b antisense-treated tumors compared with levels in tumors treated with Stat5b sense DNA. In contrast, treatment with Stat5a antisense oligonucleotides did not abrogate Cyclin D1 or BcL-xL expression (Fig. 6B)
. To investigate the mechanism of tumor growth in inhibition after Stat5b targeting, xenografts were stained for DNA fragmentation and proliferation indicies. Targeting Stat5b, but not Stat5a, resulted in decreased tumor cell proliferation as determined by staining and blotting for PCNA (Fig. 7
; data not shown). In contrast, there was no evidence of apoptosis modulation after targeting of either Stat5 isoform (data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Expression of Stat5a/b and target genes in treated tumors. A, Stat5a or Stat5b immunoblotting demonstrating down-modulation of Stat5a or Stat5b protein expression levels in the SCCHN xenografts after treatment with the respective antisense (versus sense) oligonucleotides. In contrast, treatment with Stat5a antisense oligonucleotides did not abrogate Stat5b expression, and treatment with Stat5b antisense oligonucleotides did not decrease Stat5a expression. B, Bcl-xL and Cyclin D1 immunoblotting of SCCHN xenografts treated with Stat5b antisense (or sense) oligonucleotides demonstrating decreased target gene expression. ß-Actin expression was performed as a control for loading. In contrast, treatment with Stat5a antisense oligonucleotides did not decrease protein expression levels of Cyclin D1 or Bcl-xL. The experiment was repeated with similar results obtained.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Antisense targeting of Stat5b inhibits SCCHN proliferation in vivo. SCCHN xenografts (OSC-19) were treated with Stat5b antisense (or sense) oligonucleotides or Stat5a antisense (or sense) oligonucleotides followed by immunoblotting. A, PCNA immunostaining or immunoblotting demonstrating decreased proliferation in Stat5b antisense (or sense) treated tumors. B, analysis of Stat5a antisense (or sense) treated tumors demonstrated no modulation of PCNA expression.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Our previous studies provide compelling evidence that increased expression of EGFR in SCCHN tumors is associated with decreased survival, where antitumor effects are demonstrated with EGFR targeting strategies in preclinical models (22
, 24)
. However, in the clinical setting, only modest antitumor effects have generally been observed, and only when EGFR targeting agents are combined with standard cytotoxic approaches such as chemotherapy or radiation. We reported recently that constitutive STAT activation is accompanied by resistance to stimulation or blockade of the EGFR axis in SCCHN cells (22)
. Therefore, targeting a downstream signaling pathway that regulates growth may prove efficacious, alone, or in combination with EGFR blockade.
We demonstrate here that expression and activation of Stat5b, downstream of EGFR, contribute to SCCHN carcinogenesis in vivo and may serve as a therapeutic target in cancers that demonstrate constitutive Stat5 activation. Many reports have not distinguished activation of Stat5a from Stat5b, and such a failure to determine the role of each Stat5 gene may obscure key differences. Studies of knockout mice have contributed to our understanding of the physiological roles of these closely linked STAT proteins. Stat5a-deficient mice exhibited defective mammary gland development and lactogenesis (29)
. In contrast, studies of Stat5b-deficient mice indicated that Stat5b mediates an essential function in growth hormone actions (30)
. Although previous reports have suggested potentially distinct roles for Stat5 isoforms, this study provides clear evidence that Stat5b, but not Stat5a, contributes to tumor progression in a human epithelial cancer. Whereas levels of Stat5a expression and phosphorylation were similar in tumor tissue and paired normal mucosa from head and neck cancer subjects, as well as control mucosa from subjects without cancer, Stat5b expression and phosphorylation was elevated consistently in SCCHN tumors but not in their epithelial counterparts. Additional investigation demonstrated that specific targeting of Stat5b using an antisense oligonucleotide approach abrogated tumor progression and target gene expression in vivo, whereas targeting Stat5a had no effect on tumor growth or gene expression.
In hematopoietic malignancies, Stat5 activation has been linked to transformation mediated by fusion genes including NPM/ALK, TEL/JAK2, and TEL/ABL (31
, 32)
. However, the role of Stat5 activation in epithelial tumor formation and progression has been largely unexplored. Nonspecific epithelial cell defects in the prostates of Stat5a-deficient mice have been described (33)
. Using a murine breast cancer model, it was reported recently that loss of Stat5a by genetic manipulation delayed mammary cancer progression (34)
. Stat5 has been implicated in the estrogen-regulated control of T47D cells (35)
. Unlike Stat3, which has been shown to transform mammalian fibroblasts when constitutively activated (36)
, Stat5 activation alone has not been reported to be an essential event in malignant transformation. Src kinase has been shown to phosphorylate and activate either Stat5a or Stat5b, although only Stat5b was translocated to the nucleus after phosphorylation (37)
. Using NIH-3T3 cells, Stat5b also accelerated v-Src-induced tumorigenicity, cell motility, and cell growth (38)
. These studies suggest that Stat5b activation may potentiate the malignant phenotype, which is primarily induced by other transforming events.
The mechanism of increased Stat5 activation in human cancers has not been completely defined, and may depend on the specific cell type and activating stimuli in the tumor microenvironment. Src has been shown to contribute to Stat5 activation in a vulvar squamous cell carcinoma cell line (25)
. We report here EGFR-Stat5 interactions in SCCHN cells, and we have detected Src-Stat5 complexes (either Stat5a or Stat5b) in SCCHN cell lines (data not shown). Activation of Stat5b by EGF has been reported to require EGFR overexpression (23)
.
Increased expression of EGFR is characteristic of most epithelial malignancies, including SCCHN, where autocrine or paracrine activation of EGFR is thought to contribute to tumor progression (reviewed in Ref. 39
). In the present study, we have demonstrated that targeting EGFR in a SCCHN xenograft model, using an antisense gene therapy approach, abrogated constitutive Stat5 activation, thus linking EGFR to Stat5 in vivo. Additional investigation showed that increased expression and phosphorylation of Stat5b was associated with SCCHN tumorigenesis where targeting Stat5b decreased tumor progression in vivo. The antitumor effects of Stat5b blockade can be explained, in part, by down-regulation of target genes that control growth and apoptosis. Specifically, antisense targeting of Stat5b resulted in decreased expression of Cyclin D1 and Bcl-xL. Previous studies have demonstrated that the antiapoptotic gene encoding Bcl-xL is a downstream target of both Stat3 and Stat5 (40
, 41)
. Similarly, Cyclin D1/D2 are critical cell cycle control genes that have been reported to be a target of Stat5 (42)
. The present study suggests that blockade of Stat5b in vivo leads to tumor growth inhibition primarily as a result of decreased proliferation, and not increased apoptosis. Because both STATs 3 and 5 are activated in SCCHN, and appear to contribute to growth regulation, additional studies to elucidate mechanisms of STAT activation are required. These cumulative results implicate decreased Stat5 activation as a potential antitumor mechanism of EGFR blocking approaches, and suggest that specific abrogation of Stat5b may play a role in molecular targeting strategies for cancer therapy.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Eye and Ear Institute, Suite 500, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Phone: (412) 647-5280; Fax: (412) 647-0108; E-mail: jgrandis{at}pitt.edu 
2 The abbreviations used are: STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; TGF, transforming growth factor; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TBST, Tris-buffered saline [10 mmol/liter Tris-HCL (pH 7.5) and 150 mmol/liter NaCl] with 0.5% Tween 20; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen. 
Received 5/29/03.
Revised 7/17/03.
Accepted 7/23/03.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Ihle J. N., Kerr I. M. Jaks and Stats in signaling by the cytokine receptor superfamily. Trends Genet., 11: 69-74, 1995.[Medline]
- Bromberg J., Darnell J. E., Jr. The role of STATs in transcriptional control and their impact on cellular function. Oncogene, 19: 2468-2473, 2000.[Medline]
- Zhong Z., Wen Z., Darnell J. E., Jr. Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science (Wash. DC), 264: 95-98, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Darnell J. E., Jr. Reflections on STAT3, STAT5, and STAT6 as fat STATs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 6221-6224, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ihle J. N. STATs and MAPKs: obligate or opportunistic partners in signaling. Bioessays, 18: 95-98, 1996.[Medline]
- Darnell J. E., Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science (Wash. DC), 277: 1630-1635, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Coffer P. J., Koenderman L., de Groot R. P. The role of STATs in myeloid differentiation and leukemia. Oncogene, 19: 2511-2522, 2000.[Medline]
- Onishi M., Nosaka T., Misawa K., Mui A. L., Gorman D., McMahon M., Miyajima A., Kitamura T. Identification and characterization of a constitutively active STAT5 mutant that promotes cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 3871-3879, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Slaughter D., HW S., W S. "Field cancerization" in oral stratified squamous epithelium: clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer (Phila.), 6: 963-968, 1953.
- Schwatz L. H., Oasahin M., Zhang G. N., Touboul E., De Vataire F., Andolenko P., Lacau-Saint-Guily J., Laugier A., Schlienger M. Synchronous and metachronous head and neck carcinomas. Cancer (Phila.), 74: 1933-1938, 1994.
- Rubin Grandis J., Tweardy D. J. Elevated levels of transforming growth factor
and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 3579-3584, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rubin Grandis J., Melhem M. F., Barnes E. L., Tweardy D. J. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-
and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer (Phila.), 78: 1284-1292, 1996.
- Rubin Grandis J., Tweardy D. J., Melhem M. F. Asynchronous modulation of transforming growth factor
and epidermal growth factor receptor protein expression in progression of premalignant lesions to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 13-20, 1998.[Abstract]
- Rubin Grandis J., Zeng Q., Tweardy D. J. Retinoic acid normalizes the increased gene transcription rate of TGF-
and EGFR in head and neck cancer cell lines. Nat. Med., 2: 237-240, 1996.[Medline]
- Grandis J. R., Drenning S. D., Zeng Q., Watkins S. C., Melhem M. F., Endo S., Johnson D. E., Huang L., He Y., Kim J. D. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 4227-4232, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yokoi T., Yamaguchi T., Odajima J., Furukawa K. Establishment and characterization of a human cell line derived from a squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Tumor Res., 23: 43-57, 1988.
- Sacks P. G., Parnes S. M., Gallick G. E., Mansouri Z., Lichtner R., Satya-Prakash K. L., et al Establishment and characterization of two new squamous cell carcinoma cell lines derived from tumors of the head and neck. Cancer Res., 48: 2858-2866, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schreiner, S. J., Schiavone, A. P., and Smithgall, T. E. Activation of Stat3 by the Src Family Kinase Hck Requires a Functional SH3 Domain. J. Biol. Chem., in press, 2002.
- Sadowski H. B., Shuai K., Darnell J. E., Jr., Gilman M. Z. A common nuclear signal transduction pathway activated by growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science (Wash. DC), 261: 1739-1744, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wong P., Severns C. W., Guyer N. B., Wright T. M. A unique palindromic element mediates
interferon induction of mig gene expression. Mol. Cell Biol., 14: 914-922, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sattler M., Durstin M. A., Frank D. A., Okuda K., Kaushansky K., Salgia R., Griffin J. D. The thrombopoietin receptor c-MPL activates JAK2 and TYK2 tyrosine kinases. Exp. Hematol., 23: 1040-1048, 1995.[Medline]
- Rubin Grandis J., Melhem M. F., Gooding W. E., Day R., Holst V. A., Wagener M. M., Drenning S. D., Tweardy D. Levels of TGF-
and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 824-832, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kloth M. T., Catling A. D., Silva C. M. Novel activation of STAT5b in response to epidermal growth factor. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 8693-8701, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- He Y., Zeng Q., Drenning S. D., Melhem M. F., Tweardy D. J., Huang L., Grandis J. R. Inhibition of human squamous cell carcinoma growth in vivo by epidermal growth factor receptor antisense RNA transcribed from the U6 promoter. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 1080-1087, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Olayioye M. A., Beuvink I., Horsch K., Daly J. M., Hynes N. E. ErbB receptor-induced activation of stat transcription factors is mediated by Src tyrosine kinases. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 17209-17218, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Runge D. M., Runge D., Foth H., Strom S. C., Michalopoulos G. K. STAT 1
/1ß, STAT 3 and STAT 5: expression and association with c-MET and EGF-receptor in long-term cultures of human hepatocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 265: 376-381, 1999.[Medline]
- Leong P. L., Xi S., Drenning S. D., Dyer K. F., Wentzel A. L., Lerner E. C., Smithgall T. E., Grandis J. R. Differential function of STAT5 isoforms in head and neck cancer growth control. Oncogene, 21: 2846-2853, 2002.[Medline]
- de Groot R. P., Raaijmakers J. A., Lammers J. W., Koenderman L. STAT5-dependent CyclinD1 and Bcl-xL expression in Bcr-Abl-transformed cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. Res. Commun., 3: 299-305, 2000.[Medline]
- Wakao H., Gouilleux F., Groner B. Mammary gland factor (MGF) is a novel member of the cytokine regulated transcription factor gene family and confers the prolactin response. EMBO J., 13: 2182-2191, 1994.[Medline]
- Udy G. B., Towers R. P., Snell R. G., Wilkins R. J., Park S. H., Ram P. A., Waxman D. J., Davey H. W. Requirement of STAT5b for sexual dimorphism of body growth rates and liver gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 7239-7244, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nieborowska-Skorska M., Slupianek A., Xue L., Zhang Q., Raghunath P. N., Hoser G., Wasik M. A., Morris S. W., Skorski T. Role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 in nucleophosmin/ anaplastic lymphoma kinase-mediated malignant transformation of lymphoid cells. Cancer Res., 61: 6517-6523, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Spiekermann K., Pau M., Schwab R., Schmieja K., Franzrahe S., Hiddemann W. Constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5 is induced by leukemic fusion proteins with protein tyrosine kinase activity and is sufficient for transformation of hematopoietic precursor cells. Exp. Hematol., 30: 262-271, 2002.[Medline]
- Nevalainen M. T., Ahonen T. J., Yamashita H., Chandrashekar V., Bartke A., Grimley P. M., Robinson G. W., Henninghausen L., Rui H. Epithelial defect in prostates of Stat5a-null mice. Lab. Investig., 80: 993-1006, 2000.[Medline]
- Ren S., Cai H. R., Li M., Furth P. A. Loss of Stat5a delays mammary cancer progression in a mouse model. Oncogene, 21: 4335-4339, 2002.[Medline]
- Yamashita H., Iwase H., Toyama T., Fujii Y. Naturally occurring dominant-negative Stat5 suppresses transcriptional activity of estrogen receptors and induces apoptosis in T47D breast cancer cells. Oncogene, 22: 1638-1652, 2003.[Medline]
- Bromberg J. F., Wrzeszczynska M. H., Devgan G., Zhao Y., Pestell R. G., Albanese C., Darnell J. E., Jr. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell, 98: 295-303, (Published erratum appears in Cell, 99: 239, 1999). 1999.[Medline]
- Kazansky A. V., Kabotyanski E. B., Wyszomierski S. L., Mancini M. A., Rosen J. M. Differential effects of prolactin and src/abl kinases on the nuclear translocation of STAT5B and STAT5A. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 22484-22492, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kazansky A. V., Rosen J. M. Signal transducers and activators of transcription 5B potentiates v-Src-mediated transformation of NIH-3T3 cells. Cell Growth Differ., 12: 1-7, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lui V., Rubin Grandis J. EGFR mediated cell cycle regulation. Anticancer Res., 22: 1-12, 2002.[Medline]
- Catlett-Falcone R., Landowski T. H., Oshiro M. M., Turkson J., Levitzki A., Savino R., Ciliberto G., Moscinski L., Fernandez-Luna J. L., Nunez G., Dalton W. S., Jove R. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling confers resistance to apoptosis in human U266 myeloma cells. Immunity, 10: 105-115, 1999.[Medline]
- Socolovsky M., Fallon A. E., Wang S., Brugnara C., Lodish H. F. Fetal anemia and apoptosis of red cell progenitors in Stat5a-/-5b-/- mice: a direct role for Stat5 in Bcl-X(L) induction. Cell, 98: 181-191, 1999.[Medline]
- Martino A., Holmes J. H. t., Lord J. D., Moon J. J., Nelson B. H. Stat5 and Sp1 regulate transcription of the cyclin D2 gene in response to IL-2. J. Immunol., 166: 1723-1729, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Fox, T. M. Bernaciak, J. Wen, A. M. Weaver, M. A. Shupnik, and C. M. Silva
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b, c-Src, and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Play Integral Roles in Estrogen-Stimulated Proliferation of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
1781 - 1796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Basham, M. Sathe, J. Grein, T. McClanahan, A. D'Andrea, E. Lees, and A. Rascle
In vivo identification of novel STAT5 target genes
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 1, 2008;
36(11):
3802 - 3818.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Mohankumar, J. K. Perry, N. Kannan, K. Kohno, P. D. Gluckman, B. S. Emerald, and P. E. Lobie
Transcriptional Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 3 and STAT5B Partially Mediate Homeobox A1-Stimulated Oncogenic Transformation of the Immortalized Human Mammary Epithelial Cell
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2008;
149(5):
2219 - 2229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Mallette, M.-F. Gaumont-Leclerc, G. Huot, and G. Ferbeyre
Myc Down-regulation as a Mechanism to Activate the Rb Pathway in STAT5A-induced Senescence
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 30, 2007;
282(48):
34938 - 34944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Grandis, J. Califano, I. Smith, and S. Mithani
Response: Re: Decreased STAT1 Expression by Promoter Methylation in Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
September 5, 2007;
99(17):
1344 - 1344.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lahusen, M. Fereshteh, A. Oh, A. Wellstein, and A. T. Riegel
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Signaling Controlled by a Nuclear Receptor Coactivator, Amplified in Breast Cancer 1
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2007;
67(15):
7256 - 7265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. K.S. Ku, D. C. Nguyen, M. Karaman, P. Gill, J. G. Hacia, and D. L. Crowe
Loss of p53 Expression Correlates with Metastatic Phenotype and Transcriptional Profile in a New Mouse Model of Head and Neck Cancer
Mol. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2007;
5(4):
351 - 362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shen, C. Behrens, I. I. Wistuba, L. Feng, J. J. Lee, W. K. Hong, and R. Lotan
Identification and Validation of Differences in Protein Levels in Normal, Premalignant, and Malignant Lung Cells and Tissues Using High-Throughput Western Array and Immunohistochemistry
Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2006;
66(23):
11194 - 11206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. K. Lee, K. Man, R. T.P. Poon, C. M. Lo, A. P. Yuen, I. O. Ng, K. T. Ng, W. Leonard, and S. T. Fan
Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 5b Activation Enhances Hepatocellular Carcinoma Aggressiveness through Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2006;
66(20):
9948 - 9956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Weaver and C. M. Silva
Modulation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b Activity in Breast Cancer Cells by Mutation of Tyrosines within the Transactivation Domain
Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2006;
20(10):
2392 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kalyankrishna and J. R. Grandis
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Biology in Head and Neck Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 10, 2006;
24(17):
2666 - 2672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lee and H. Yu
Methylation of Stat1 Promoter Can Contribute to Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
February 1, 2006;
98(3):
154 - 155.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Xi, K. F. Dyer, M. Kimak, Q. Zhang, W. E. Gooding, J. R. Chaillet, R. L. Chai, R. E. Ferrell, B. Zamboni, J. Hunt, et al.
Decreased STAT1 Expression by Promoter Methylation in Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
February 1, 2006;
98(3):
181 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shi, J. C. Cooper, and C.-L. Yu
A Constitutively Active Lck Kinase Promotes Cell Proliferation and Resistance to Apoptosis through Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b Activation
Mol. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2006;
4(1):
39 - 45.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Phung-Koskas, A. Pilon, C. Pous, C. Betzina, M. Sturm, M.-L. Bourguet-Kondracki, G. Durand, and A. Drechou
STAT5B-mediated Growth Hormone Signaling Is Organized by Highly Dynamic Microtubules in Hepatic Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 14, 2005;
280(2):
1123 - 1131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gonsky, R. L. Deem, J. Bream, H. A. Young, and S. R. Targan
Enhancer Role of STAT5 in CD2 Activation of IFN-{gamma} Gene Expression
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 2004;
173(10):
6241 - 6247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|