| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Departments of Pathology [D. E. H., A. R., A. M.], Surgery [C. J. Y.], and Oncology [C. J. Y.], The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and the Institute of Cell Biology and Bonner Forum Biomedizin, University of Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany [S. W., V. H.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-secretase-dependent proteolytic processing on the cell surface to release sAPP, Aß or p3 peptide, and CTFs (Fig. 1A
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture, Antibody Incubation, and BrdUrd Labeling.
Pancreatic cancer cell lines PancI, HS766T, and BxPC3 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection cell line bank (Manassas, VA). HPDE cells represent an immortal cell line from normal pancreatic duct epithelium (HPDE) transfected by the E6 and E7 gene of human papillomavirus 16 (8)
. Cells were grown on 10-cm Falcon dishes (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in DMEM (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corp., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO). Twenty-four h before antibody or sAPP addition, the cell culture medium was replaced with DMEM/0.5% fetal bovine serum. Antibody incubation was performed with the appropriate dilution of mouse control IgG1 (Cymbus Technology, Chandlers Ford, United Kingdom) or monoclonal APP A4/22C11 (NH2-terminal antibody; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) for 24 h. Cells were subsequently labeled for 6 h using the BrdUrd Labeling Kit I (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and stained per protocol. sAPP was added to cell culture medium at the start of the 6-h BrdUrd incubation period. Medium collection was performed over a 24-h period in DMEM, and media were centrifuged to remove particulate matter and concentrated 10x using a Savant DNA Speed Vac (GMI, Albertville, MN).
Immunocytochemistry.
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, rinsed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.075% Triton X-100, blocked for 20 min in 2 mg/ml BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in PBS (BSA/PBS), and incubated primary antibody diluted in 2 mg/ml BSA/PBS for 2 h at room temperature. Antibodies used for study include COOH-terminal APP antibodies [1:500 (Chemicon International) and 1:500 (Sigma)] and an NH2-terminal APP antibody (1:500; Chemicon International). Cells were then rinsed and incubated for 1 h in donkey antirabbit FabCy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA). Phalloidin colabeling was performed with a 1:1000 dilution of FITC-labeled reagent (Sigma). Coverslipping was performed using Vectashield mounting media with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). For peptide blocking experiments, a final dilution of 1:500 COOH-terminal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) and 100 µg/ml peptide was performed for 1 h in PBS before immunolabeling.
Microscopy.
Slides were imaged with a Zeiss Axioskop epifluorescence microscope equipped with short-arc mercury lamp illumination (Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) and a x100/1.4 NA oil immersion Neofluar lens. Fluorescent images were captured with a cooled charge-coupled device camera (Micro MAX digital camera; Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ).
Cell Extracts and Western Blotting.
Confluent cells were extracted into 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM DTT, and 0.01% w/v bromphenol blue; sonicated for three 10-s intervals; and boiled for 5 min. Proteins were fractionated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 12% acrylamide/0.4% bis-acrylamide and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 200 mM glycine, and 20% methanol for 2 h at 100 mA. Blots were blocked with 5% skim milk diluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl containing 0.05% Tween 20, incubated in a 1:1000 dilution of a COOH-terminal APP antibody (Chemicon) or a 1:1000 dilution of NH2-terminal antibody (22C11; Chemicon), and rinsed. Blots were then incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey antirabbit or antimouse IgG antibody (1:5000; Amersham Corp.) and visualized using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Kit (Amersham Corp.). Exposure times ranged from 30 s to 2 min.
Patient Material.
Permission for this study was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Joint Committee for Clinical Investigation. Paraffin-embedded material from a series of 10 pancreatectomies containing pancreatic cancer resected at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD) between 1996 and 2001 was used for this study.
Immunohistochemistry.
Sections (34 µm) from paraffin-embedded tissue were used for immunohistochemistry. Slides were deparaffinized in fresh xylenes and rehydrated through sequential graded ethanol steps. Antigen retrieval was performed by citrate buffer incubation [18 mM citric acid/8 mM sodium citrate (pH 6)] using a household vegetable steamer (Black and Decker) for 60 min. Slides were incubated for 5 min with 3% hydrogen peroxide; washed in 20 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 (pH 7.6); and incubated in appropriate antibody dilution for APP (1:100; COOH-terminal domain; Cell Signaling Technology) for 60 min at room temperature. The avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark) was used to visualize antibody binding, and slides were subsequently counterstained with hematoxylin.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-secretase-dependent cleavage of APP (9)
. HPDE cells demonstrated the presence of most components of the APP processing and signaling pathway, except PS-1 (Fig. 1B)
APP Localization in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.
APP is synthesized at ribosomal sites, inserted into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum, and posttranslationally modified in the Golgi network (10)
. We performed immunofluorescent localization of APP in BxPC3 and PancI cells using antibodies directed against the NH2 and COOH termini. Immunolabeling of BxPC3 and PancI cells with two antibodies directed against different COOH-terminal epitopes revealed a similar perinuclear distribution pattern of APP (Fig. 2, A and B)
, which has been previously described to colocalize with markers of the Golgi complex, such as mannosidase II (5)
. Immunolabeling with an NH2-terminal APP antibody revealed a diffuse pattern in BxPC3 cells but an intense, perinuclear localization in PancI cells (Fig. 2, C and D)
. The diffuse pattern identified on the surface of BxPC3 cells is reminiscent of that identified with labeled sAPP in multiple cell types (11)
. HPDE cells demonstrated perinuclear distribution of APP in only scattered cells (<5%; data not shown).
|
APP Undergoes Variable Levels of Proteolytic Processing in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines.
The APP protein exists as multiple isoforms produced through alternative splicing of APP mRNA (1)
. Although much of APP remains as full-length protein (Mr 105,000160,000) at cellular membranes, APP can undergo proteolytic processing to release a soluble Mr
100,000 extracellular NH2-terminal fragment (sAPP), a soluble Mr 3,000 (p3) or Mr 4,500 (Aß) extracellular fragment, and Mr 10,00012000 CTFs.
We examined APP protein products in HPDE and the pancreatic cancer cell lines HS766T, PancI, BxPC3, and CFPC1 using a COOH-terminal-directed antibody. Variable levels of proteolytic processing of APP were apparent in each cell line, with full-length APP present in HS766T, PancI, and CFPC1 cells (Fig. 3A
, FL) and in BxPC3 cells on prolonged exposure. BxPC3 cells, however, demonstrated high levels of CTF products, indicating that virtually all APP produced in this cell line undergoes complete proteolytic processing (Fig. 3A
, CTF). In contrast, CFPC1 cells demonstrated only full-length APP and no identifiable CTFs. Blots were reprobed with an actin antibody to ensure equal protein levels.
|
Incubation of BxPC3 Cells with Blocking Antibody Toward sAPP Reduces BxPC3 Cell Number and Proliferative Index.
The monoclonal antibody A4/22C11 directed against sAPP has previously been demonstrated to bind to sAPP and reduce sAPP695-induced neural stem cell proliferation (11
, 13)
. We therefore performed BrdUrd labeling of BxPC3 cells in the presence of control IgG1 antibody or 22C11 at various dilutions to determine a potential role for sAPP in pancreatic cancer cell growth.
BxPC3 cells grow in clusters (see Fig. 2A
), and incubation of these cells with a 1:100 dilution of control antibody did not significantly alter cellular morphology (Fig. 3D)
. An identical dilution of A4/22C11, however, decreased the total number of cells (Fig. 3E)
, as well as the number of cell clusters present (Fig. 3, E and F)
. A 6-h BrdUrd pulse in the presence of a 1:100 dilution of 22C11 antibody significantly reduced proliferation to approximately 6070% of control (Fig. 3G)
. A 1:250 dilution also significantly reduced BrdUrd labeling, albeit to a lesser extent. These findings suggest that sAPP may function in these cells to mediate cell number through effects on proliferative activity.
Addition of Exogenous sAPP Increases BXPC3 Proliferation.
We next incubated cells with exogenous, purified sAPP to determine whether addition of this peptide would increase cell proliferation over baseline levels. Addition of 8 nM sAPP increased proliferation of BxPC3 cells 15% over baseline (P = 0.16436), and addition of 16 nM sAPP significantly increased proliferation by 38% over baseline (P = 0.04485; Fig. 3H
). The concentration of sAPP used in these experiments is similar to that used previously to identify an increase in cell proliferation in basal cells of the epidermis (4)
, suggesting a physiological role for sAPP in both normal and disease states.
APP Is Expressed in Human Pancreatic Cancer Specimens.
To determine the expression of APP in human pancreas and pancreatic cancer specimens, we performed immunohistochemical labeling using an antibody directed against the COOH-terminal of APP on 10 resected pancreatic cancer specimens and surrounding normal pancreas. Normal adult human pancreas expressed signal in the majority of pancreatic cells, including acinar and islet cells (Fig. 4)
. Small and large ductal epithelium, however, demonstrated no immunoreactivity for APP (Fig. 4
A, arrowhead). Pancreatic cancer specimens demonstrated robust immunolabeling for APP (Fig. 4, B and C)
, confirming in vitro findings of increased expression in pancreatic cancer cells as compared with normal ductal epithelium. Incubation of antibody with blocking peptide eliminated all staining (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
APP expression in the normal adult pancreas appears to be localized to acinar and islet cells, but not ductal epithelium cells. Because ductal epithelium has been proposed to give rise to pancreatic adenocarcinoma through a series of genetic alterations, the lack of detectable expression in these cells suggests an up-regulation of APP expression in pancreatic carcinogenesis. The expression of APP in both pancreatic cancer specimens by immunohistochemistry and in pancreatic cancer cell lines by immunocytochemistry confirms this finding.
To further explore up-regulation of APP transcripts in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we examined online SAGE libraries of pancreatic cancer and normal ductal epithelium (HX and H126). SAGE profiling indicates tags for APP in the pancreatic cancer cell line CAPAN1 (26 tags/million), but not normal ductal epithelium cells. Furthermore, a large increase in SAGE tag number for PS-1, a necessary component of the
-secretase complex that cleaves APP, is also evident in pancreatic cancer cells and may explain the high levels of proteolytic processing of APP in these cells. Up-regulation of APP promoter activity and increased APP expression have been described secondary to cytokine and growth factor addition in physiological systems (14
, 15)
, and similar effects may occur within a cancerous milieu.
sAPP can be cleaved close to the transmembrane domain of APP through the actions of
-secretase under normal conditions or ß-secretase under pathological conditions such as Alzheimers disease. sAPP has been demonstrated to bind to the cell membrane of thryocytes and fibroblasts (16)
. In studies using radiolabeled peptide, sAPP competitively bound to localized patches on FRTL-5 and PC-12 cell membranes, indicating the presence of a specific receptor for sAPP (11)
. Furthermore, preferential binding of sAPP occurs at undifferentiated cell membranes, suggesting a putative role for this peptide fragment in cell growth or differentiation (11)
.
In our studies, the APP NH2-terminal appeared to be fully cleaved and solubilized in BxPC3 cells. Immunolabeling for sAPP demonstrated a fine punctate membranous pattern in these cells that was not evident in Panc1 cells and may reflect surface-associated sAPP in BxPC3 cells.
Incubation of fibroblasts and thyrocytes with sAPP results in an up-regulation of cell proliferation, and sAPP has been shown to mediate this growth-promoting effect through MAP kinase phosphorylation in FRTL-5 thyroid epithelium cells (16) . In addition to effects on the cell cycle, sAPP has also been demonstrated to alter cell morphology by inducing the extension of neurite processes in neuroblastoma cells (17) . Blockade of sAPP signaling in BxPC3 cells demonstrates a reduction in the overall number of cancer cell clusters and an increase in the number of individually identifiable cells. Furthermore, incubation of these cells with exogenous sAPP demonstrates a significant increase in cancer cell proliferation. This proproliferative effect of sAPP may result from activation of MAP kinase, similar to that described in FRTL-5 cells (14) , or by additional mechanisms such as protein kinase C activation (18) , Akt phosphorylation (19) , or activation or potentiation of growth factor signaling pathways (20 , 21) .
The ability of APP to induce growth-promoting effects and morphological alterations occurs not only through effects of the soluble NH2-terminal fragment of APP but may also occur through effects of the cytosolic domain of APP, whether cleaved or intact. We have identified the presence of multiple cytosolic interactors of APP, including JIP1b, Fe65, ShcA, and APPBP1, many of which may function in a neoplastic system to induce cell proliferation and migration (12 , 22 , 23) .
JIP1b serves as a scaffold protein that regulates the activity of c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase, a member of the MAP kinase signaling family that couples to microtubules via kinesin (22 , 24) . Fe65 has recently been shown to colocalize with APP, actin, and Mena at sites of dynamic actin rearrangement (focal complexes), rather than at static cell-cell adhesion sites (focal adhesions), and overexpression of APP and Fe65 can induce an increase in Madin-Darby canine kidney cell migration (12) . APPBP1 can mediate the cell cycle by promoting S to M transition (23) . Interaction of Shc/Grb2/SOS has been associated with Ras activation, although in the vast majority of pancreatic cancers, mutations in RAS2 induce constitutive activation of the K-ras gene product (25) , which may reduce the relevance of the Shc/Grb2/SOS pathway in this cancer type.
In conclusion, we have identified an increased expression of APP in pancreatic cancer cells, and these cells appear to undergo, in certain instances, virtually complete processing of APP to yield soluble intra- and extracellular peptides. sAPP signaling appears to increase the level of cellular proliferation in BxPC3 cells, similar to that reported in other noncancerous cell types. We propose that sAPP may serve a proproliferative role in certain pancreatic cancer cell subtypes. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the role of the COOH-terminal region of APP and its cytosolic interactors in pancreatic cancer intracellular signaling pathways.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross 632, Baltimore, MD 21205. Phone: (410) 955-3511; Fax: (410) 614-0671; E-mail: dhansel{at}jhmi.edu ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid precursor protein; sAPP, soluble APP (NH2-terminal of APP); CTF, COOH-terminal fragment; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; APPBP1, APP-binding protein 1; PS-1, presenilin-1; SAGE, serial analysis of gene expression; MAP, mitogen-activated protein. ![]()
Received 3/21/03. Revised 7/15/03. Accepted 8/26/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 in cultured embryonic rat neocortical cells. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 53: 24-32, 1998.[Medline]
-amyloid precursor protein. J. Neurosci. Res., 63: 410-420, 2001.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K.-i. Takayama, S. Tsutsumi, T. Suzuki, K. Horie-Inoue, K. Ikeda, K. Kaneshiro, T. Fujimura, J. Kumagai, T. Urano, Y. Sakaki, et al. Amyloid Precursor Protein Is a Primary Androgen Target Gene That Promotes Prostate Cancer Growth Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 69(1): 137 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Krause, S. Karger, S.-Y. Sheu, T. Aigner, R. Kursawe, O. Gimm, K.-W. Schmid, H. Dralle, and D. Fuhrer Evidence for a role of the amyloid precursor protein in thyroid carcinogenesis J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 198(2): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Arvidsson, E. Andersson, A. Bergstrom, M. K Andersson, G. Altiparmak, A.-C. Illerskog, H. Ahlman, D. Lamazhapova, and O. Nilsson Amyloid precursor-like protein 1 is differentially upregulated in neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2008; 15(2): 569 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gronborg, T. Z. Kristiansen, A. Iwahori, R. Chang, R. Reddy, N. Sato, H. Molina, O. N. Jensen, R. H. Hruban, M. G. Goggins, et al. Biomarker Discovery from Pancreatic Cancer Secretome Using a Differential Proteomic Approach Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2006; 5(1): 157 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Baldus, S. Liyanarachchi, K. Mrozek, H. Auer, S. M. Tanner, M. Guimond, A. S. Ruppert, N. Mohamed, R. V. Davuluri, M. A. Caligiuri, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotypes and abnormal chromosome 21: Amplification discloses overexpression of APP, ETS2, and ERG genes PNAS, March 16, 2004; 101(11): 3915 - 3920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |