Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheard, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vojtesek, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheard, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vojtesek, B.
[Cancer Research 63, 7176-7184, November 1, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Role of p53 in Regulating Constitutive and X-Radiation-Inducible CD95 Expression and Function in Carcinoma Cells1

Michael A. Sheard2, Stjepan Uldrijan and Borivoj Vojtesek

Laboratory of Apoptosis Research [M. A. S.] and Laboratory of Tumor Biology [S. U., B. V.], Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The p53 tumor suppressor protein is known to regulate the expression of the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death receptor in a small subset of normal cell types as well as in many cancer cell types. However, whether p53-dependent regulation of CD95 expression is consistently associated with increased susceptibility to CD95-mediated cell death is poorly understood. To address this issue, we examined constitutive and induced CD95 surface expression and function in wild-type p53-expressing carcinoma cells relative to their isogenic p53-inactivated counterparts. We compared HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells with their p53 biallelic knock-outs and control-transfected MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells with MCF-7 cells expressing a miniprotein inhibitor of p53 (p53DD). In both cell lines, the constitutive expression of surface CD95 was significantly reduced in p53-inactivated cells, as was the apoptotic response to agonistic anti-CD95 antibody. In both cell lines, only cells with wild-type p53 activity exhibited up-regulation of surface CD95 after ionizing irradiation. Interestingly, induction of CD95 expression substantially enhanced the apoptotic response to CD95 ligation only in MCF-7 cells but not in HCT116 cells. These findings provide direct evidence for a major role for wild-type p53 activity in regulating constitutive expression and function of CD95 in carcinoma cells; however, they also demonstrate that the functional effect of DNA damage-induced up-regulation of CD95 may be cell type specific.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Inadequate cell death underlies many diseases, including cancer. Apoptosis is an evolutionarily conserved program of cell death in which a cell specifically participates in its own dismantling. Apoptosis involves activation of members of the caspase family of cysteine proteases exhibiting specificity for aspartic acid residues. Caspases cleave multiple targets, including DNA and cytoskeletal proteins such as actin, lamin B, {alpha}-fodrin, and cytokeratins-18 and -19, thereby facilitating the preparatory dismantling of dying cells for efficient phagocytosis by neighboring cells or antigen-presenting cells in a process that circumvents physiologically unnecessary inflammation.

Both caspase-dependent and -independent pathways of cell death may be relevant for cancer research (reviewed in Ref. 1 ). Cell death induced by ionizing radiation is believed to occur through classical reproductive death (mitotic catastrophe) and/or apoptosis, depending on cell type. Reproductive cell death results from a failure of DNA-damaged cells to faithfully repair DNA lesions, eventually resulting in imbalances in biochemical reactions, and can occur as late as four to five cell divisions after treatment with ionizing radiation (reviewed in Refs. 2 , 3 ). Interestingly, reproductive cell death frequently culminates with secondary intrinsic apoptosis in many cell types (reviewed in Ref. 4 ).

Apoptosis can be induced through two main pathways: (a) release of apoptogenic molecules from mitochondria on recognition of intracellular stress (the intrinsic pathway), and (b) ligation of death receptors on the cell surface (the extrinsic pathway; reviewed in Ref. 5 ). In the intrinsic pathway, release of cytochrome c into the cytosol activates caspase-9 in a complex with the APAF-1 protein, subsequently inducing activation of downstream effector caspases. In one well-studied example of the extrinsic pathway, aggregation of the CD95 death receptor induces recruitment of the protein FADD and subsequent activation of caspase-8 in a death-inducing signaling complex (reviewed in Ref. 6 ). Active caspase-8 truncates and thereby activates the protein Bid, which then translocates to mitochondria and induces release of cytochrome c. In some cell types, caspase-8 can also directly activate a sufficient amount of caspase-3 in a more direct route to apoptosis induction. In addition, CD95 may mediate caspase-independent cell death through recruitment of the protein RIP (7) . Many tumor cell types are relatively resistant to signaling through CD95, although they express CD95 on their cell surface (8) . Treatment with IFN-{gamma} (9 , 10) , IL-123 (11 , 12) , IL-18 (13) , or agents that inhibit protein synthesis, such as cycloheximide and actinomycin D, can sensitize most resistant cell types, partially through CD95 up-regulation (in response to IFN-{gamma}, IL-12, and IL-18) but also through a poorly understood mechanism that is independent of CD95 expression levels. Through production of cytokines, CTLs can induce CD95 expression on target cells that can subsequently facilitate exocytosis-independent induction of apoptosis (14) . Increased surface expression of CD95 endows an enhanced "sentinel" function, allowing target cells to more readily receive apoptotic signals delivered during encounter with CTLs and natural killer cells expressing CD178, the natural ligand for CD95 (5) .

In a subset of normal tissues, cell death can be induced by activation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein (4) . Activation of p53 protein induces its function as a target-specific regulator of gene transcription, consequently modulating the expression of downstream proteins, many of which can promote apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, or DNA repair, depending on cell type and context. The p53 protein is strongly activated by DNA double-strand breaks. Double-strand breaks occur after treatment with ionizing radiation or genotoxic drugs as well as during DNA replication. Because neither cell cycle arrest nor apoptosis favors tumorigenesis, the p53 gene is mutated or lost in more than half of human tumors, and p53 protein activity may be inhibited in some of the tumors that retain exclusively wild-type alleles of the p53 gene (15 , 16) . In most tumor types, however, a lethal dose of ionizing radiation induces cell death regardless of p53 functional status (4 , 17) . Furthermore, ionizing radiation appears to induce a primary wave of apoptosis only in tumor types that originate from tissues that are susceptible to p53-dependent apoptosis, i.e., cells of the hematopoietic system, epithelium of the small intestine, hair follicles, and spermatogonia (4) . In addition to directly inducing cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, p53 may exert additional effects in cells that survive its activation, but these effects are not well characterized.

p53 (18) , as well as nuclear factor-{kappa}B (19 , 20) , is a transcriptional regulator of the cd95 gene. It has recently become clear that loss of p53 activity prevents DNA-damaged tumor cells from increasing their expression of CD95 (21, 22, 23) . To date, however, the functional relevance of this loss of regulation of CD95 expression has been examined almost exclusively through correlative data. Genotoxin-induced, p53-dependent up-regulation of CD95 in vitro has previously been reported to correlate with increased apoptosis in response to treatment with agonistic anti-CD95 antibody (24 , 25) . Additionally, we have recently reported that infection of cells with simian virus-40 results in loss of p53-dependent up-regulation of CD95 expression that correlates with loss of enhancement of anti-CD95 antibody-induced apoptosis after DNA damaging treatment (26) . However, correlative data are not definitive in these systems because at least one arm of the CD95 signaling pathway can be sensitized by p53-activating agents in a manner that may be independent of p53 (27 , 28) ; i.e., DNA damage-induced enhancement of responsiveness to signals through CD95 might be partially unrelated to p53 activity. Thus, although DNA-damaging drugs (22 , 27) and ionizing radiation (28, 29, 30) enhance the response of sensitive cells or presensitized cells to CD95-mediated cell death, the relative contribution of p53 activity is unclear, and direct evidence is needed to firmly establish a causative relationship between p53-dependent regulation of CD95 expression and increased function. To address these issues, we used two models of p53 inactivation to examine the role of wild-type p53 activity in regulating the constitutive level and the DNA damage-induced enhancement of CD95 expression and function.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Cultures and Irradiation.
MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells and derived clones were maintained in DMEM, and HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells (p53+/+ and -/-, kindly provided by Bert Vogelstein, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD) were maintained in McCoy’s medium; both media contained 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and antibiotics. Culturing was in 5% CO2 at 37°C. In experiments involving inhibition of caspase activity, cells were plated at ~40% confluency, and fresh medium was added every 3 days and 24 h before harvesting. In experiments examining dose-fractionated radiation-induced enhancement of CD95-mediated apoptosis, cells were plated at ~80% confluency, and fresh medium was added every 3 days and 8 h after the final irradiation. Cells were subjected to fractionated doses of X-radiation Tuesday through Friday of the first week and Monday through Thursday of the second week. Irradiation was administered with a Clinac 600C linear accelerator (Varian, Palo Alto, CA) at a dose rate of 2.4 Gy/min

Reagents.
IFN-{gamma}, cycloheximide, and anti-actin mAb clone AC-40 were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). mAb clone M30 (Roche/Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) was used to recognize a neo-epitope expressed on a cytokeratin-18 fragment generated specifically by caspase activity. Agonistic anti-CD95 IgM mAb (clone CH11), FITC-conjugated anti-CD95 mAb (clone UB2), and FITC-conjugated isotype-matched (IgG1) irrelevant antibody were purchased from Immunotech (Westbrook, ME). mAb DO-1 recognizes the epitope 20SDLWKL25 in the NH2-terminal region of human p53 (31 , 32) . mAb Bp53-10 is specific for the COOH-terminal region of p53 (33 , 34) . mAb 118 is specific for p21waf1/cip1 (35) . mAb PC-10 specifically binds PCNA (36) . Anti-caspase-8 mAb clone 12F5, linked/FLAG-tagged recombinant CD178 (SUPERFas-Ligand), and Z-VAD-fmk were from Alexis (San Diego, CA).

Quantitation of Cell Death.
Cells were harvested with 0.1% trypsin plus 0.25% EGTA in PBS (pH 7.4; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4 in distilled water). Analyses of sub-G1 DNA content were performed as described previously (28) after pooling of adherent and floating cells. Cell viability was calculated as the frequency of cells excluding the vital dye trypan blue as determined by counting of a minimum of 200 cells under a light microscope for each sample. Cell survival was determined according to clonogenic survival in standard colony-forming assays with crystal violet as the stain. Colonies with >50 cells were counted.

Cells containing fragments of intracellular cytokeratin-18 were detected as described previously (26) . The M30 antibody was diluted 1:250 in staining solution for MCF-7 cells and derived clones and 1:50 for HCT116 cells. Cells were quantitatively analyzed on an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) using the manufacturer’s analysis software. Subcellular debris was eliminated from analysis by appropriate gating of the forward- and side-scatter parameters.

Stable Transfection.
Clones of MCF-7 cells were derived by transfection with a plasmid coding for a truncated, dominant-negative mouse p53 protein including amino acid residues 1–14 and 302–390 under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter (pCMV-p53DD); expression of this miniprotein specifically inhibits p53 activity (37 , 38) . This miniprotein should not interact with p53 family members p63 and p73 because the COOH-terminal oligomerization domain of wild-type p53 does not bind these proteins (39) . As controls, Neo clones were derived by transfection of a bacterial gene for neomycin phosphotransferase under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter (pCMV-Neo). Stable transfectants were selected by use of 2 mg/ml G418 sulfate (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland). Independently isolated clones expressing high levels of p53DD miniprotein were examined to control for unexpected effects of DNA insertion sites.

Protein Detection.
Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were performed as described previously (26) . Immunocytochemistry was performed as described (23) .

Cell Cycle Analysis.
DNA content was quantitated as described previously (23 , 28) . The percentages of cells in each phase of the cell cycle were determined with use of MultiCycle-AV software (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Radiation-Induced Death of HCT116 and MCF-7 Cells Ends with Apoptosis.
We wanted to evaluate the role of p53 activity in regulation of both constitutive and DNA damage-induced expression and function of CD95. As a DNA-damaging agent, ionizing radiation was chosen because its effects are limited mainly to generation of free radicals and DNA strand breaks (4) . Before examining anti-CD95 antibody-induced death in cells that survive irradiation, we evaluated the type of cell death induced by radiation alone. HCT116 and MCF-7 cells expressing wild-type p53 were X-irradiated with 2 Gy for 4 or 8 consecutive weekdays in the continuous presence or absence of the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk and examined for dead cells bearing sub-G1 DNA. In the absence of Z-VAD, fractionated radiation induced a substantial level of sub-G1 events in HCT116 cells, measured 1 day after the end of the 4- or 8-day irradiation schedule as well as 8 days after the end of the 8-day schedule (Fig. 1A)Citation . Similar results were obtained for MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1A)Citation . A single large dose of 16 Gy induced delayed occurrence of sub-G1 events, which appeared by 4 days after irradiation in both cell lines (data not shown). Interestingly, continuous incubation with Z-VAD reduced the percentage of fractionated radiation-induced sub-G1 events by >50% (Fig. 1A)Citation . The fraction of irradiated cells that exhibited sub-G1 DNA content in the presence of Z-VAD may have died a caspase-independent death because DNA fragmentation is known to occur during late necrosis and so-called paraptosis and is therefore not completely specific to apoptosis (1) .



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Radiation-induced death of HCT116 and MCF-7 carcinoma cells ends with apoptosis. Fractionally irradiated cells were incubated both during and after irradiation in the continuous presence (or absence) of the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk (25 µM). A, DNA content analysis. Specified flasks were irradiated with 2 Gy for 4 (4x) or 8 consecutive weekdays (8x) and harvested 1 or 8 days after the final dose, as shown. Cells were permeabilized and stained with a hypotonic propidium iodide solution. In each histogram, the percentage of events with sub-G1 DNA content is given. In panels A–C, fresh medium (with or without Z-VAD) was added to cell cultures 24 h before harvest; results are representative of three independent experiments. B, cell viability as detected by trypan blue staining of nonpermeabilized cells after trypsinization. {blacksquare}, Z-VAD-fmk; {square}, no Z-VAD-fmk added. Data are presented as means of three independent experiments (bars, upper limits of SDs). C, cellular expression of fragments of cytokeratin-18 (CK18). Fixed and permeabilized cells were stained with a mAb that specifically recognized the epitope generated by caspase-dependent cleavage of cytokeratin-18. D, cell survival as determined in colony-forming assays. Continuous incubation with Z-VAD began 24 h after plating of irradiated cells. Colonies of HCT116 cells were counted 22 (±1) days after the final dose of X-radiation; colonies of MCF-7 cells were counted 27 (±2) days after the final dose. Colonies were visualized with crystal violet. Results are representative of four independent experiments. {diamondsuit}, no Z-VAD; {blacksquare}, Z-VAD added.

 
Inhibition of radiation-induced sub-G1 events by Z-VAD should not be interpreted as indicating that inhibition of apoptosis can reduce the overall level of radiation-induced cell death for the following reasons. In the trypan blue dye-exclusion assay, irradiated cells receiving Z-VAD appeared to lose viability in numbers approximately equal to those for cells not receiving Z-VAD (Fig. 1B)Citation . Furthermore, although Z-VAD inhibited fragmentation of cytokeratin-18 in irradiated cells, it did not inhibit the emergence of a large subset of cells exhibiting reduced side scattering of laser light (Fig. 1C)Citation . Finally, in clonogenic assays, Z-VAD did not rescue cells from radiation-induced reduction in long-term survival (Fig. 1D)Citation . Thus, inhibition of caspase activity altered the characteristics of radiation-induced death, but not the frequency (1 , 17) . These results imply that although apoptosis was dispensable for radiation-induced death, fractionated radiation-induced death of these carcinoma cells preferentially ended with apoptosis, consistent with the generally held belief that radiation-induced reproductive cell death ends with secondary apoptosis in many cell types (4) .

p53 Regulates Constitutive and DNA Damage-Inducible CD95 Expression in HCT116 Cells.
Because a small subset of cells survived radiation treatment (Fig. 1D)Citation , we examined a potentially complementary route for killing surviving cells. We evaluated whether p53 enhanced the response of surviving cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis. It has previously been reported that the response to CD95-mediated signals can be regulated at the level of surface expression (40) . However, after DNA damage, the relative contribution of p53-dependent up-regulation of CD95 surface expression to enhancement of CD95-mediated cell death is poorly defined because cells with mutant p53 might also become more responsive to CD95-mediated signals (27 , 28) . To address this question, we used as a model p53-deficient (-/-) HCT116 cells (41) . The status and function of p53 in these cells were confirmed by examining the expression and function of human p53 and p21waf1/cip1 proteins. p53+/+ HCT116 cells constitutively expressed a detectable level of human p53 that was elevated 2 h after X-irradiation (8 Gy), and this elevation was partially reduced after 8 h (Fig. 2A)Citation . As expected, p53-/- cells expressed no p53 protein, and no induction was observed after irradiation. Induction of wild-type p53 expression 2 h after irradiation of p53+/+ cells corresponded to a weak induction of the protein product of the p53-regulated gene p21waf1/cip1 and was followed by strong up-regulation 8 h after irradiation (Fig. 2A)Citation . On the other hand, p21 protein in p53-/- cells was virtually undetectable, and no induction was observed (Fig. 2A)Citation . Elevated expression of p21 in p53+/+ cells correlated with a modest arrest of the cell cycle in G1 phase relative to p53-/- cells (Fig. 2B)Citation , as shown previously (41) .



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Model of p53 deficiency. A, effect of p53 deficiency on regulation of p21waf1/cip1 expression after X-irradiation. p53+/+ and -/- HCT116 cells were X-irradiated with 8 Gy, and lysates were prepared 2 and 8 h later for immunoblotting. mAb DO-1 was used to recognize human p53. Unirr., unirradiated B, effect of p53 deficiency on cell cycle arrest. Cells were irradiated and harvested 24 h later for analysis of DNA content by flow cytometry. The percentages of cells in the G1, S, and G2-M phases of the cell cycle are given for each histogram.

 
A high constitutive level of CD95 was expressed on the surfaces of p53+/+ HCT116 cells and was up-regulated to an even higher level after a single X-radiation dose of 8 Gy (Fig. 3A)Citation . Interestingly, constitutive surface expression of CD95 was substantially reduced in p53-/- cells (Fig. 3A)Citation . Furthermore, X-irradiation of p53-/- cells did not induce a detectable increase in surface CD95 expression (Fig. 3A)Citation . This latter result is consistent with the reported requirement for p53 in DNA damage-induced up-regulation of CD95 expression (21 , 22 , 30) .



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of wild-type p53 activity on constitutive and X-radiation-induced enhancement of responsiveness to CD95-mediated signals in HCT116 cells. A, p53+/+ and -/- HCT116 cells were X-irradiated (8 Gy) and examined 24 h later for surface expression of CD95 by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry. Solid lines, anti-CD95 antibody clone UB2; dotted lines, isotype-matched irrelevant antibody. The ratio of mean fluorescence intensities is shown for each overlay. B, effect of agonistic anti-CD95 antibody alone (100 ng/ml) or combination with radiation plus anti-CD95 antibody on apoptosis. Twenty-four h after X-irradiation, all cultures were pretreated with the sensitizing agent cycloheximide (2 µg/ml), followed by addition of anti-CD95 antibody 4 h later. After an additional 44 h, cells were harvested and analyzed for expression of cytokeratin-18 (CK18) fragments. The means of triplicates plus the upper limits of the SD (bars) are shown. The percentage of cells with specific anti-CD95 antibody-induced cytokeratin-18 fragments was calculated as follows: (percentage of cells with cytokeratin-18 fragments after treatment with anti-CD95 antibody) - (percentage of control cells with cytokeratin-18 fragments without anti-CD95 antibody treatment). * and **, statistically significant difference (Student’s t test): *, P < 0.03; **, P < 0.02. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Unirr., unirradiated. C, cleavage of caspase-8. Twenty-four h after X-irradiation, all cultures received cycloheximide for 4 h, and then specified cultures were incubated with agonistic anti-CD95 antibody. After 14 h, lysates were prepared for detection of caspase-8 cleavage on immunoblots. Unirr., unirradiated; Ab, antibody.

 
The reduced level of constitutive CD95 expression observed in p53-/- cells was associated with a significantly reduced functional response to treatment with anti-CD95 antibody (P < 0.001, Student’s t test; Fig. 3BCitation ). Unexpectedly, however, loss of radiation-induced surface up-regulation (Fig. 3A)Citation had little or no functional consequence; after X-irradiation (8 Gy), there was a relatively small increase in anti-CD95 antibody-induced apoptosis in both p53+/+ and -/- cells (Fig. 3B)Citation . These findings indicate that radiation pretreatment modestly increased the amount of apoptosis induced by anti-CD95 antibody but do not support a major role for p53 in mediating this effect in HCT116 cells.

To further characterize the role of p53 in regulating the constitutive level and the radiation-induced enhancement of CD95-mediated apoptosis, we examined activation of downstream caspase-8. After treatment with anti-CD95 antibody, the decreases in the 54–55-kDa full-length inactive forms of caspase-8 were more pronounced in unirradiated p53+/+ cells than in -/- cells (Fig. 3C)Citation . Radiation enhanced this effect and induced a small but detectable increase in the active 41–43-kDa forms of caspase-8 in both groups of cells (Fig. 3C)Citation .

p53 Regulates Constitutive and Inducible CD95 Expression in MCF-7 Cells, with a Major Effect on Function.
We next used a model of stable transfection of MCF-7 cells with a truncated version of the mouse wild-type p53 gene. The inactive miniprotein product of this gene (p53DD) has been shown to specifically bind and stabilize wild-type human p53, prolonging its usually transient expression and inhibiting its function (37 , 38) . Two clones of MCF-7 cells expressing the miniprotein were established and named DDp53-9 and DDp53-12. Expression of the p53DD miniprotein was confirmed by detection of an ~19-kDa band by use of a COOH-terminal-specific anti-p53 antibody (Fig. 4A)Citation . We confirmed inactivation of wild-type p53 by the miniprotein by examining human p53 and p21waf1/cip1 protein expression and function after irradiation. Parental MCF-7 and vector-transfected control cells (clones Neo-3 and Neo-7) constitutively expressed a low level of human p53 protein that was transiently elevated 2 h after X-irradiation (8 Gy), and the elevation was decreased by 8 h (Fig. 4A)Citation , as reported previously (42) .



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Model of inhibition of wild-type p53 activity by stable transfection of MCF-7 cells with a truncated form of p53 (p53DD miniprotein). A, effect of p53DD miniprotein transfection on regulation of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 expression after X-irradiation. Parental MCF-7 cells, Neo control clones (Neo-3 and Neo-7), and p53DD-expressing clones (DDp53-9 and DDp53-12) were X-irradiated with 8 Gy, and lysates were prepared 2 and 8 h later for immunoblotting. mAb DO-1 was used to specifically recognize the NH2-terminal region of human p53 that is not contained in the truncated mouse miniprotein. Anti-p53 mAb Bp53-10 was used to detect the COOH-terminal region expressed by the p53DD miniprotein. B, cell cycle analysis. Cells were irradiated and harvested as described in the legend for Fig. 2Citation B. C, stabilization of human wild-type p53 in p53DD-expressing clones. Cells were fixed and stained for expression of p53 (DO-1 antibody) or, as a control, PCNA (PC-10 antibody) and assayed by immunocytochemistry. Unirr., unirradiated.

 
Miniprotein-transfected cells (clones DDp53-9 and DDp53-12) contained a high level of human p53 protein, and little or no induction of p53 expression was observed at either time point after irradiation. Induction of wild-type p53 expression 2 h after irradiation of parental MCF-7 cells and Neo clones corresponded to a weak induction of p21waf1/cip1 protein and was followed by substantial up-regulation 8 h after irradiation; on the other hand, the barely detectable level of p21 protein in miniprotein-expressing clones remained unchanged (Fig. 4A)Citation . Elevated expression of p21 protein in irradiated MCF-7 cells and Neo-transfected clones correlated with G1 arrest of the cell cycle, whereas miniprotein-expressing cells exhibited no detectable arrest of their cell cycle (Fig. 4B)Citation . Immunocytochemistry indicated that the miniprotein had stabilized human p53 expression in 100% of cells (Fig. 4C)Citation , indicative of the clonal origin of these cultures.

MCF-7 cells and Neo clones expressed a low constitutive level of CD95 on their cell surfaces and exhibited significant up-regulation of CD95 after a single dose of X-radiation (8 Gy; Fig. 5ACitation ). Constitutive expression of surface CD95 was substantially reduced in both miniprotein-expressing clones (Fig. 5A)Citation . X-irradiation of miniprotein-expressing clones did not induce a detectable increase in surface CD95 expression (Fig. 5A)Citation .



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of wild-type p53 activity on constitutive and X-radiation-induced enhancement of responsiveness to CD95-mediated signals in MCF-7 cells. A, immunofluorescent staining of surface CD95 expression. MCF-7 cells, Neo, and DDp53 clones were treated and analyzed as in the legend for Fig. 3Citation A. B, effect of anti-CD95 antibody alone or combination treatment with radiation plus anti-CD95 antibody on apoptosis. Cells were treated as described in the legend for Fig. 3Citation B. The means of three independent experiments are shown, performed as described in the legend for Fig. 3Citation B. *, P < 0.02; N.S., not significant. C, cleavage of caspase-8. Cells were prepared as in Fig. 3Citation C. Unirr., unirradiated; CK18, cytokeratin-18; Ab, antibody.

 
The reduction in constitutive CD95 expression observed in miniprotein-expressing clones was associated with a significantly reduced ability to induce CD95-mediated apoptosis. As assessed by staining for intracellular cytokeratin-18 fragments, >=25% of unirradiated MCF-7 cells and Neo clones specifically underwent apoptosis relative to untreated controls after aggregation of CD95 with agonistic antibody, whereas <10% of unirradiated p53DD-expressing clones underwent anti-CD95 antibody-induced apoptosis (P <= 0.05, Student’s t test; Fig. 5BCitation ). Thus, as in HCT116 cells, regulation of constitutive expression of CD95 by p53 had a measurable functional consequence in MCF-7 cells. Unlike HCT116 cells, however, loss of radiation-induced surface up-regulation had a substantial functional effect in MCF-7 cells. After X-irradiation (8 Gy), >50% of MCF-7 cells and Neo clones specifically underwent anti-CD95 antibody-induced cell death, an increase of 25–30% above the rate for unirradiated cells treated with anti-CD95 antibody. On the other hand, the percentage of specific CD95-mediated death in equivalently treated p53-expressing clones was >20%, representing an increase of only 5–10% above that of unirradiated cells treated with anti-CD95 antibody (Fig. 5B)Citation . These findings indicate that more than half of the single-dose radiation-induced enhancement of anti-CD95 antibody-induced apoptosis in MCF-7 cells is dependent on wild-type p53 activity.

Agonistic anti-CD95 antibody induced significant cleavage of the inactive 54–55-kDa full-length forms of caspase-8 to its 41–43-kDa forms in unirradiated MCF-7 cells and Neo clones, but not in DDp53 clones (Fig. 5C)Citation . Furthermore, CD95-mediated cleavage of caspase-8 was considerably more prominent in irradiated MCF-7 and Neo cultures than in unirradiated cultures. In contrast, cleavage was virtually undetectable in irradiated DDp53 clones.

To exclude the possibility that these findings might occur only under conditions that do not mimic the clinical situation, we used a dose-fractionated regimen because this is the type of treatment provided to human patients (4) . To further approximate in vivo conditions, IFN-{gamma} was used as a sensitizing agent instead of cycloheximide. Because up-regulation of CD95 expression is one of the mechanisms activated by IFN-{gamma} to sensitize cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis (9 , 10) , we began by examining CD95 surface expression 24 h after treatment with IFN-{gamma}, fractionated X-radiation, or both. In Neo cells, surface CD95 expression was up-regulated by either IFN-{gamma} or fractionated irradiation, and an additive effect was consistently observed when these agents were combined (Fig. 6A)Citation . A similar additive effect was seen when IFN-{gamma} was combined with etoposide or 5-fluorouracil (data not shown). In p53DD-expressing cells, IFN-{gamma}, but not fractionated radiation, substantially increased CD95 surface expression, and no additive effect was observed (Fig. 6A)Citation .



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Comparison of dose-fractionated X-radiation-induced enhancement of signals through CD95 triggered by either anti-CD95 agonistic antibody or recombinant CD178 protein. A, effect of IFN-{gamma} and fractionated X-radiation on surface expression of CD95 in DDp53 and Neo cells. Cells were irradiated as in Fig. 1Citation , and on the final day of irradiation, indicated cultures received IFN-{gamma} (40 pg/ml). Surface expression of CD95 was assessed 24 h later by flow cytometry. B, effect of IFN-{gamma} and fractionated X-radiation on cell death induced by anti-CD95 antibody (100 ng/ml) or recombinant CD178 (50 ng/ml) in DDp53 and Neo cells. Results in A and B are each representative of three independent experiments. C, colony-forming assay. Sequential treatment with fractionated X-radiation and recombinant CD178 differentially affected cell survival in DDp53 and Neo cells. One day after the end of the 8-day irradiation schedule, cells were seeded and subsequently given recombinant CD178 after another 4 h. No sensitizing pretreatment was used. Colonies were counted 27 (±1) days after seeding. In irradiated Neo-7 cultures, the difference observed between cells treated or not with recombinant CD178 was statistically significant for all seeding groups (P <= 0.004, Fisher’s exact test). Results are representative of four independent experiments. {diamondsuit}, no recombinant CD178; {blacksquare}, recombinant CD178 added. Unirr., unirradiated; Ab, antibody; rec., recombinant; CK18, cytokeratin-18.

 
Functional analyses indicated that wild-type p53 activity contributed substantially more than half of the fractionated radiation-induced enhancement of CD95-mediated apoptosis in IFN-{gamma}-sensitized cells, regardless of whether the CD95-aggregating modality was anti-CD95 antibody or recombinant CD178. In the experiment shown in Fig. 6BCitation , treatment of Neo cultures with IFN-{gamma} plus anti-CD95 antibody specifically induced 17% cell death in unirradiated cultures (26% - 9%) and 35% in fractionally irradiated cultures (68% - 33%) relative to cultures receiving only IFN-{gamma}. In p53DD-expressing cells, IFN-{gamma} plus anti-CD95 mAb specifically induced 12% cell death in unirradiated cultures and only 15% in fractionally irradiated cultures. IFN-{gamma} plus recombinant CD178 induced 20% specific cell death in unirradiated Neo cells and 43% in irradiated cells. In p53DD-expressing cultures, IFN-{gamma} plus recombinant CD178 induced 15% specific cell death in unirradiated cells and 19% in irradiated cells. These findings in DDp53 cells suggest that IFN-{gamma} can partially restore CD95 expression and function to tumor cells that have reductions in these characteristics caused by obstruction of normal p53 activity. In addition, these results indicate that most of the radiation-induced enhancement of the response to CD95-mediated signals in MCF-7 cells is dependent on wild-type p53 activity, in contrast to the situation in HCT116 cells.

A measurable difference might have been expected between the effects of anti-CD95 antibody and recombinant CD178 in the absence of sensitizing pretreatment, particularly in CD95-resistant cells such as MCF-7, because it is known that the amount of cell death induced by anti-CD95 agonistic antibodies does not necessarily correlate well with results obtained with CD178 protein (reviewed in Ref. 43 ). Indeed, in the absence of presensitization with IFN-{gamma} in Neo cells, anti-CD95 antibody had little detectable effect on viability, whereas recombinant CD178 induced ~12% specific cell death in unirradiated cells (18% - 6%) and ~27% in irradiated cells (54% - 27%; Fig. 6BCitation ). In contrast, in p53DD-expressing cells in the absence of IFN-{gamma} presensitization, neither recombinant CD178 nor anti-CD95 antibody had a significant effect on viability in either unirradiated or fractionally irradiated cultures, presumably because of the nearly negative level of constitutive CD95 surface expression in these clones (Fig. 6A)Citation . These results with recombinant CD178 support the conclusion that regulation of surface expression of CD95 by p53 can have significant functional consequences in resistant cells even in the absence of previous sensitization. Furthermore, these findings indicate that X-radiation can behave as a partial sensitizing agent (without IFN-{gamma} presensitization) for apoptosis induced by recombinant CD178 protein (but not by anti-CD95 agonistic antibody), at least for cell types exhibiting p53-dependent CD95 up-regulation.

To further explore the sensitizing potential of fractionated radiation for CD178-induced cell death, we performed clonogenic assays on fractionally irradiated cells incubated with recombinant CD178 in the absence of IFN-{gamma} pretreatment. In Neo cells, recombinant CD178 reproducibly exerted only a minor effect on colony formation in unirradiated cells, but importantly, it reduced the number of colonies surviving fractionated irradiation by at least 4-fold (Fig. 6CCitation , left panels). In p53DD-expressing cells, recombinant CD178 had no detectable effect on colony formation in either unirradiated or fractionally irradiated cultures (Fig. 6CCitation , right panels). Altogether, these findings provide direct evidence that p53-dependent regulation of CD95 surface expression plays a major role in X-radiation-induced enhancement of CD95-mediated death in MCF-7 cells, regardless of whether signaling through CD95 is achieved by (a) agonistic antibody in the presence of sensitizing pretreatment with either cycloheximide (Fig. 5B)Citation or IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 6B)Citation , or (b) recombinant CD178 in the absence or presence of sensitizing pretreatment (Fig. 6, B and C)Citation .


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of the role of p53 in regulating CD95 expression and function in different cellular contexts is an ongoing process. It has been reported that p53 and CD95 function in independent intracellular pathways of cell death in healthy, noncancerous thymocytes and hepatocytes (44) . In contrast, CD95 was recently reported to be involved in the p53-dependent apoptotic response to ionizing radiation in mouse testis (45) . However, it is notable that spermatogonia belong to the small subset of tissue types that is susceptible to p53-dependent apoptosis, whereas most epithelial tissues are not susceptible. In addition, mouse testis expresses CD178 constitutively, whereas human testis does not. Furthermore, many healthy tissues do not show up-regulated CD95 expression after DNA-damaging ionizing irradiation (21) . For these reasons, involvement of CD95 in rapid, p53-mediated death after genotoxic treatment appears to be the exception rather than the rule in most cell types (4 , 21 , 44) . Instead, the role of p53-dependent regulation of CD95 expression may be to influence susceptibility to subsequent interactions with immune effector cells.

The consequences of p53 activation might be more pronounced in untreated cancer cells than in healthy tissues. In cancer cells, it is possible that cancer-associated alterations, such as oncogene activation, directly enhance the expression or activities of factors that are required for p53 activation (reviewed in Ref. 16 ). This suggests the possibility that downstream events in the p53 pathway (such as CD95 up-regulation) might be more profound in tumor cells than in healthy cells, even in tumor cells that survive p53 activation. The results presented here demonstrate that p53 regulates the constitutive expression of CD95 in HCT116 and MCF-7 carcinoma cells derived from colon and breast tissues, whose cells are not susceptible to p53-dependent apoptosis. Similarly, it was recently reported that p53-dependent regulation of constitutive CD95 surface expression occurs in oncogene-transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts (30) . In these transformed fibroblasts (30) as well as in HCT116 and MCF-7 carcinoma cells, constitutive CD95 expression was decreased by the loss of p53 activity to a level that significantly inhibited transmission of death-inducing signals. This indicates that substantial reductions in constitutive CD95 expression and function caused by inhibition of p53 activity during tumorigenesis might be mechanisms that allow tumor cells to partially evade the CD178-dependent arm of CTL- and natural killer cell-mediated killing. Encouragingly however, carcinoma cells that have lost most of their constitutive surface expression of CD95 after loss of p53 activity can nonetheless be partially sensitized to CD178-induced apoptosis by IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 6B)Citation .

In addition to the emerging role of p53 in regulating constitutive CD95 expression and function described above, it is becoming clear that p53 regulates inducible CD95 expression and function after DNA damage, at least in reported tumor cell models. Bleomycin was reported to induce p53-dependent enhancement of CD95 expression and function in an artificial p53-expression system in Hep3B cells (22) . Furthermore, {gamma}-irradiation was shown to induce transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts expressing a low level of CD95 to be more responsive to CD95-mediated signals, in a p53-dependent manner (30) . However, we found that despite exhibiting a similar amount of radiation-induced up-regulation of CD95 expression, the cell lines used in our study differed qualitatively in the level of enhanced responsiveness to CD95 ligation. In HCT116 cells expressing a high constitutive level of CD95, radiation induced up-regulation of CD95 expression but had little or no effect on responsiveness to anti-CD95 antibody, whereas in MCF-7 cells expressing a low constitutive level of CD95, radiation induced both up-regulation of surface expression and significant enhancement of responsiveness. These results suggest that the level of constitutive surface expression may have affected, to some degree, the extent of the functional effect of surface up-regulation of CD95. Another, nonmutually exclusive possibility is that the effect of radiation-induced up-regulation of surface CD95 expression in HCT116 cells may have been limited by a prosurvival balance in the availability of downstream effector and inhibitor molecules. These findings in HCT116 and MCF-7 cells indicate that up-regulation of CD95 expression after p53 activation may substantially increase susceptibility to CD95-mediated signals in only a subset of tumor cell types.

It has been reported that wild-type p53 activity may hinder chemotherapy in some tumor types by inducing cell cycle arrest, thereby allowing time for tumor cells to recover from genotoxic treatment (46) . Although p53 does not contribute directly to tumor cell death in many cell types (4) , p53-dependent enhancement of CD95 expression and function might be detrimental to tumor cells in the presence of an activated antitumor immune response that involves effector cells producing IFN-{gamma} and expressing CD178.

Regulation of the level of CD95 expression and function by wild-type p53 in wild-type p53-expressing HCT116 and MCF-7 cells (Figs. 3Citation and 5)Citation , as well as fibroblasts (30) , suggests that the act of restoring wild-type p53 activity to cells lacking this activity might be sufficient—in many cell types—to enhance their susceptibility to death signaling through the CD95 receptor. On the basis of this rationale, future therapies aimed at restoring p53 activity might complement treatments that reactivate the stalled antitumor immune response.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank B. Vogelstein (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD) for the gift of p53+/+ and -/- HCT116 cells, L. Dubska for critically reading the manuscript, R. Bartlova for help with irradiation, and K. Jamborova for expert technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (Grants NC6402-3/2000, NC7133-3/2002, and NC7131-3/2002), and by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (301/03/0545). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Hematology-Oncology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027. Phone: (323) 669-5633; Fax: (323) 664-9455; E-mail: msheard{at}chla.usc.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PCNA, proliferating-cell nuclear antigen. Back

Received 9/27/02. Revised 6/19/03. Accepted 9/ 5/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mathiasen I. S., Jaattela M. Triggering caspase-independent cell death to combat cancer. Trends Mol. Med., 8: 212-220, 2002.[Medline]
  2. Muschel R. J., Soto D. E., McKenna W. G., Bernhard E. J. Radiosensitization and apoptosis. Oncogene, 17: 3359-3363, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Meyn R. E. Apoptosis and response to radiation: implications for radiation therapy. Oncology, 11: 349-356, 1997.[Medline]
  4. Gudkov A. V., Komarova E. A. The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 3: 117-129, 2003.[Medline]
  5. Green D. R., Evan G. I. A matter of life and death. Cancer Cell, 1: 19-30, 2002.[Medline]
  6. Walczak H., Krammer P. H. The CD95 (APO-1/Fas) and the TRAIL (APO-2L) apoptosis systems. Exp. Cell Res., 256: 58-66, 2000.[Medline]
  7. Holler N., Zaru R., Micheau O., Thome M., Attinger A., Valitutti S., Bodmer J. L., Schneider P., Seed B., Tschopp J. Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule. Nat. Immunol., 1: 489-495, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Owen-Schaub L. B., Radinsky R., Kruzel E., Berry K., Yonehara S. Anti-Fas on nonhematopoietic tumors: levels of Fas/APO-1 and bcl-2 are not predictive of biological responsiveness. Cancer Res., 54: 1580-1586, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yonehara S., Ishii A., Yonehara M. A cell-killing monoclonal antibody (anti-Fas) to a cell surface antigen co-downregulated with the receptor of tumor necrosis factor. J. Exp. Med., 169: 1747-1756, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. von Reyher U., Strater J., Kittstein W., Gschwendt M., Krammer P. H., Moller P. Colon carcinoma cells use different mechanisms to escape CD95-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Res., 58: 526-534, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wigginton J. M., Gruys E., Geiselhart L., Subleski J., Komschlies K. L., Park J. W., Wiltrout T. A., Nagashima K., Back T. C., Wiltrout R. H. IFN-{gamma} and Fas/FasL are required for the antitumor and antiangiogenic effects of IL-12/pulse IL-2 therapy. J. Clin. Investig., 108: 51-62, 2001.[Medline]
  12. Lafleur E. A., Jia S. F., Worth L. L., Zhou Z., Owen-Schaub L. B., Kleinerman E. S. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-12 gene transfer up-regulate Fas expression in human osteosarcoma and breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 61: 4066-4071, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hashimoto W., Osaki T., Okamura H., Robbins P. D., Kurimoto M., Nagata S., Lotze M. T., Tahara H. Differential antitumor effects of administration of recombinant IL-18 or recombinant IL-12 are mediated primarily by Fas-Fas ligand- and perforin-induced tumor apoptosis, respectively. J. Immunol., 163: 583-589, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Simon M. M., Waring P., Lobigs M., Nil A., Tran T., Hla R. T., Chin S., Mullbacher A. Cytotoxic T cells specifically induce Fas on target cells, thereby facilitating exocytosis-independent induction of apoptosis. J. Immunol., 165: 3663-3672, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vogelstein B., Lane D., Levine A. J. Surfing the p53 network. Nature (Lond.), 408: 307-310, 2000.[Medline]
  16. Vousden K. H., Lu X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2: 594-604, 2002.[Medline]
  17. Brown J. M., Wouters B. G. Apoptosis, p53, and tumor cell sensitivity to anticancer agents. Cancer Res., 59: 1391-1399, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Owen-Schaub L. B., Zhang W., Cusack J. C., Angelo L. S., Santee S. M., Fujiwara T., Roth J. A., Deisseroth A. B., Zhang W. W., Kruzel E., Radinsky R. Wild-type human p53 and a temperature-sensitive mutant induce Fas/APO-1 expression. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3032-3040, 1995.[Abstract]
  19. Chan H., Bartos D. P., Owen-Schaub L. B. Activation-dependent transcriptional regulation of the human Fas promoter requires NF-{kappa}B p50–p65 recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 2098-2108, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ouaaz F., Li M., Beg A. A. A critical role for the RelA subunit of nuclear factor {kappa}B in regulation of multiple immune-response genes and in Fas-induced cell death. J. Exp. Med., 189: 999-1004, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bouvard V., Zaitchouk T., Vacher M., Duthu A., Canivet M., Choisy-Rossi C., Nieruchalski M., May E. Tissue and cell-specific expression of the p53-target genes: bax, fas, mdm2 and waf1/p21, before and following ionising irradiation in mice. Oncogene, 19: 649-660, 2000.[Medline]
  22. Muller M., Wilder S., Bannasch D., Israeli D., Lehlbach K., Li-Weber M., Friedman S. L., Galle P. R., Stremmel W., Oren M., Krammer P. H. p53 activates the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) gene in response to DNA damage by anticancer drugs. J. Exp. Med., 188: 2033-2045, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sheard M. A., Vojtesek B., Janakova L., Kovarik J., Zaloudik J. Up-regulation of Fas (CD95) in human p53wild-type cancer cells treated with ionizing radiation. Int. J. Cancer, 73: 757-762, 1997.[Medline]
  24. Muller M., Strand S., Hug H., Heinemann E. M., Walczak H., Hofmann W. J., Stremmel W., Krammer P. H., Galle P. R. Drug-induced apoptosis in hepatoma cells is mediated by the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) receptor/ligand system and involves activation of wild-type p53. J. Clin. Investig., 99: 403-413, 1997.[Medline]
  25. Ruiz-Ruiz M. C., Lopez-Rivas A. p53-mediated up-regulation of CD95 is not involved in genotoxic drug-induced apoptosis of human breast tumor cells. Cell Death Differ., 6: 271-280, 1999.[Medline]
  26. Sheard M. A., Vojtesek B. Simian virus-40 infection inhibits DNA damage-induced enhancement of CD95 expression and function. Oncogene, 21: 190-197, 2002.[Medline]
  27. Micheau O., Solary E., Hammann A., Martin F., Dimanche-Boitrel M. T. Sensitization of cancer cells treated with cytotoxic drugs to fas-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 89: 783-789, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sheard M. A., Krammer P. H., Zaloudik J. Fractionated {gamma}-irradiation renders tumour cells more responsive to apoptotic signals through CD95. Br. J. Cancer, 80: 1689-1696, 1999.[Medline]
  29. Kimura K., Gelmann E. P. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and Fas activate complementary Fas-associated death domain-dependent pathways that enhance apoptosis induced by {gamma}-irradiation. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 8610-8617, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Maecker H. L., Koumenis C., Giaccia A. J. p53 promotes selection for Fas-mediated apoptotic resistance. Cancer Res., 60: 4638-4644, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Vojtesek B., Bartek J., Midgley C. A., Lane D. P. An immunochemical analysis of the human nuclear phosphoprotein p53. New monoclonal antibodies and epitope mapping using recombinant p53. J. Immunol. Methods, 151: 237-244, 1992.[Medline]
  32. Stephen C. W., Helminen P., Lane D. P. Characterisation of epitopes on human p53 using phage-displayed peptide libraries: insights into antibody-peptide interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 248: 58-78, 1995.[Medline]
  33. Bartek J., Bartkova J., Lukas J., Staskova Z., Vojtesek B., Lane D. P. Immunohistochemical analysis of the p53 oncoprotein on paraffin sections using a series of novel monoclonal antibodies. J. Pathol., 169: 27-34, 1993.[Medline]
  34. Pospisilova S., Brazda V., Amrichova J., Kamermeierova R., Palecek E., Vojtesek B. Precise characterisation of monoclonal antibodies to the C-terminal region of p53 protein using the PEPSCAN ELISA technique and a new non-radioactive gel shift assay. J. Immunol. Methods, 237: 51-64, 2000.[Medline]
  35. Fredersdorf S., Milne A. W., Hall P. A., Lu X. Characterization of a panel of novel anti-p21Waf1/Cip1 monoclonal antibodies and immunochemical analysis of p21Waf1/Cip1 expression in normal human tissues. Am. J. Pathol., 148: 825-835, 1996.[Abstract]
  36. Waseem N. H., Lane D. P. Monoclonal antibody analysis of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Structural conservation and the detection of a nucleolar form. J. Cell Sci., 96: 121-129, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Shaulian E., Zauberman A., Ginsberg D., Oren M. Identification of a minimal transforming domain of p53: negative dominance through abrogation of sequence-specific DNA binding. Mol. Cell. Biol., 12: 5581-5592, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gottlieb E., Haffner R., von Ruden T., Wagner E. F., Oren M. Down-regulation of wild-type p53 activity interferes with apoptosis of IL-3-dependent hematopoietic cells following IL-3 withdrawal. EMBO J., 13: 1368-1374, 1994.[Medline]
  39. Gaiddon C., Lokshin M., Ahn J., Zhang T., Prives C. A subset of tumor-derived mutant forms of p53 down-regulate p63 and p73 through a direct interaction with the p53 core domain. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21: 1874-1887, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lee J. K., Sayers T. J., Brooks A. D., Back T. C., Young H. A., Komschlies K. L., Wigginton J. M., Trout R. H. IFN-{gamma}-dependent delay of in vitro tumor progression by Fas overexpression on murine renal cancer cells. J. Immunol., 164: 231-239, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bunz F., Dutriaux A., Lengauer C., Waldman T., Zhou S., Brown J. P., Sedivy J. M., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science (Wash. DC), 282: 1497-1501, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lu X., Lane D. P. Differential induction of transcriptionally active p53 following UV or ionizing radiation: defects in chromosome instability syndromes?. Cell, 75: 765-778, 1993.[Medline]
  43. Roy S., Nicholson D. W. Cross-talk in cell death signaling. J. Exp. Med., 192: F21-F25, 2000.[Medline]
  44. O’Connor L., Harris A. W., Strasser A. CD95 (Fas/APO-1) and p53 signal apoptosis independently in diverse cell types. Cancer Res., 60: 1217-1220, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Embree-Ku M., Venturini D., Boekelheide K. Fas is involved in the p53-dependent apoptotic response to ionizing radiation in mouse testis. Biol. Reprod., 66: 1456-1461, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. te Poele R. H., Okorokov A. L., Jardine L., Cummings J., Joel S. P. DNA damage is able to induce senescence in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 62: 1876-1883, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Gelbard, C. T. Garnett, S. I. Abrams, V. Patel, J. S. Gutkind, C. Palena, K.-Y. Tsang, J. Schlom, and J. W. Hodge
Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation of Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Augments CTL-Mediated Lysis.
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1897 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. T. Garnett, C. Palena, M. Chakarborty, K.-Y. Tsang, J. Schlom, and J. W. Hodge
Sublethal Irradiation of Human Tumor Cells Modulates Phenotype Resulting in Enhanced Killing by Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7985 - 7994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheard, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vojtesek, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheard, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vojtesek, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online