| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
College of Pharmacy [A. S. J., P. B. D.] and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine [C. M. E., A. P. D., G. S. R.], University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Herein we report on the preparation and in vitro characterization of fibrinogen-coated olive oil droplets loaded with docetaxel and on preliminary studies in which those droplets were used successfully to treat B16F10 melanomas growing in the abdominal cavities of C57BL/6 mice.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Formulations.
When included in an olive oil preparation, docetaxel was first dissolved in the oil to a final concentration of 1.0 mg·ml-1 by using intermittent sonication in an ultrasonic water bath over the course of an hour. As determined using a HPLC method described below, such sonication did not result in any discernable deterioration of the docetaxel.
Docetaxel-free and docetaxel-loaded olive oil droplets coated with either F68 alone or with F68 and fibrinogen were prepared for use in vitro using the method of high-pressure extrusion as the first step in the process (1) . To a clean, 12 x 75-mm glass tube were added 220 µl of either drug-loaded or drug-free olive oil, and 4.78 ml of an aqueous solution containing 0.01 M Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4 and 0.14 M NaCl (pH 7.40) and 1.0 mg·ml-1 F68 (PBS-F68). The oil/aqueous buffer mixture was first gently agitated and then extruded five times under high pressure (103.5 MPa) through the aperture of a homogenizer (EmulsiFlex-20,000-B3; Avestin, Ottawa, Canada). If the droplets were not to be coated with fibrinogen, then the resulting oil-in-water emulsion was used directly without further processing. If the droplets were to be coated with fibrinogen, however, then the resulting oil-in-water emulsion was added to 1.0 ml of PBS containing 4.0 mg·ml-1 fibrinogen. After sonicating them for 20 s using an ultrasonic water bath, oil droplets dispersed in fibrinogen-containing medium were floated using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min. Five ml of the resulting infranatant were removed, and the remaining 1.0 ml containing the fibrinogen-coated oil droplets was dispersed in 4.0 ml of PBS-F68. The droplets were then again floated using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min. After discarding 4.0 ml of the infranatant, the remaining droplet-rich 1.0 ml was dispersed in 4.0 ml of PBS-F68 for use. As necessary, the resulting dispersions were further diluted with PBS-F68. If not applied in oil droplets, then the docetaxel that was used in tissue culture experiments was added to culture in 5.0 µl of DMSO.
Dosage requirement and a limitation in administered volume precluded the use in vivo of drug-loaded oil droplets formulated as described above. For use in vivo, more oil-rich formulations were needed, and they were prepared as follows. To a clean, 12 x 75-mm glass tube were added 2.0 ml of either drug-loaded or drug-free olive oil, and 3.0 ml of PBS-F68. The oil/water mixture was gently agitated and then extruded five times through the aperture of the homogenizer. If the droplets were not to be coated with fibrinogen, then the resulting oil-in-water emulsion was used without further processing. If the droplets were to be coated with fibrinogen, however, then the resulting oil-in-water emulsion was added to 2.0 ml of PBS containing 4.0 mg·ml-1 fibrinogen. After sonicating them for 20 s using an ultrasonic water bath, the fibrinogen-coated oil droplets were floated using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min. Six ml of the resulting infranatant were removed, and the remaining 1.0 ml containing the cream layer was dispersed in 4.0 ml of PBS-F68. The droplets that had constituted the cream layer were then again floated using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min. After discarding 4.0 ml of the resulting infranatant, the oil droplets in the remaining 1.0 ml were dispersed in 4.0 ml of PBS-F68 for use.
The concentrations of docetaxel in the various stock emulsions were determined using HPLC as described below. On the basis of those determinations, stock emulsions were diluted as necessary to the final desired concentrations of the drug.
Taxotere was prepared to a final concentration of 400 µg docetaxel/ml inoculum according to the manufacturers instructions. Unless specified otherwise, PBS was used as diluent for the commercial formulation.
Sizing Oil Droplets.
Oil droplets were sized using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (LS 230; Coulter, Miami, FL). Docetaxel-loaded oil droplets were added directly to the water-filled sizing chamber of the analyzer. Refractive indices of 1.47 (triolein) and 1.33 (water) were used when fitting droplet data to the analyzers preprogrammed sizing algorithm.
Quantification and Coagulability of Fibrinogen on Oil Droplets.
The difference between the absorbance at 280 nm due to fibrinogen in the solution used to coat oil droplets and that due to fibrinogen in the post-coating, oil-free infranatant was used to determine the amount of fibrinogen associated with oil droplets. Thrombin-inducible agglutination of fibrinogen-coated olive oil droplets was monitored using a platelet aggregometer as described elsewhere (11)
.
Cell Culture.
Unless specified otherwise, MCF-7 and B16F10 cells were propagated as monolayer cultures in 25-cm2 rectangular plastic flasks (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA) containing RPMI 1640 supplemented with fetal bo-vine serum (10%, v/v), penicillin (100 units·ml-1), streptomycin (100 µg·ml-1), L-glutamine (2 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (2%, v/v), and potassium ferricyanide (20 µM). Before harvesting the cells, the medium above them was decanted, and they were then overlaid with trypsin-EDTA solution (Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature. Nb2-11 cells were maintained as suspension cultures in rectangular 25 cm2 cell culture flasks containing Fischers growth medium supplemented with horse serum (10%, v/v), fetal bovine serum (10%, v/v), penicillin (50 units·ml-1), streptomycin (50 µg·ml-1), and 2-mercaptoethanol (10 µM). All cells were harvested from cultures by using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 5 min.
Cell Proliferation Assay.
To assess cell proliferation, we monitored the incorporation of [3H]thymidine into Nb2-11 cells. For this purpose, a 185.0-µl aliquot of growth medium containing 40,000 cells was added to individual wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. The following treatments were then applied to triplicate samples of cells: (a) 5.0 µl of DMSO alone; (b) 5.0 µl of DMSO containing 0.8 ng of docetaxel; (c) 5.0 µl of docetaxel-free, fibrinogen-coated droplets of olive oil (i.e., 1:275 dilution of parent emulsion); (d) 5.0 µl of fibrinogen-free droplets of olive oil containing 0.8 ng of docetaxel (i.e., 1:275 dilution of parent emulsion); and (e) 5.0 µl of fibrinogen-coated droplets of olive oil containing 0.8 ng of docetaxel (i.e., 1:275 dilution of parent emulsion). All test preparations were formulated using sterile materials and techniques. The treated cells were incubated in standard fashion at 37°C for 20 h. After that time, [3H]thymidine, 0.5 µCi in 10.0 µl, was added to each of the wells containing cells. The cells were once again incubated at 37°C, for another 4 h. After that, the cells were harvested onto glass microfiber filters, and the radioactivity associated with them was determined. As stimulation index, we used the ratio of the mean ± SD radioactivity in a test sample to the mean ± SD radioactivity in the negative control.
Growth Inhibition Assay.
Growth inhibition assays involving either 1 x 105 B16F10 cells or 1 x 105 MCF-7 cells were performed as described elsewhere (12)
. Test and control materials were assessed in triplicate. We took as the result of a growth inhibition assay the number of adherent cells from a treated sample as a percentage of the number of adherent cells from the untreated control sample.
Clonogenic Assay.
The cytotoxicity of various test materials was also assessed using B16F10 melanoma cells in a clonogenic assay (12)
. Test and control materials were assessed in triplicate. The result of a clonogenic assay was recorded as the ratio of the mean ± SD of number of colonies in a treated sample to the mean ± SD of the number of colonies in an untreated control sample.
Extraction and Quantification of Docetaxel from Cultured Tumor Cells.
B16F10 cells (5.0 x 106) obtained from cultures in exponential growth phase were added in
10 ml of medium to rectangular 75 cm2 cell culture flasks (Corning Costar). After incubating the cells at 37°C for 24 h, the culture medium and any nonadherent cells were decanted from the flasks and replaced with fresh medium to which docetaxel had been added, either in oil droplets or solubilized in 5.0 µl of DMSO. The final concentration of drug in the extracellular medium was 10.0 µM. Cells were then incubated in the presence of docetaxel at 37°C for various lengths of time, after which the drug-containing medium was decanted, and the adherent cells were washed twice. After liberating the adherent cells from the surface of a flask by using a rubber cell scraper, the resulting cell suspension was collected, and the cells were sedimented using centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 5 min. All but 1.0 ml of the supernatant overlying the cell pellet was aspirated from the sample. The cells were then resuspended in that residual volume, which was transferred to a tissue grinder tube. After homogenizing the cells, the docetaxel was first extracted using a solid-phase method (13)
and then quantified using an established HPLC procedure (13)
The amount of docetaxel in a homogenate was referenced against the homogenates protein content. Protein content was determined using the method of Lowry et al. (14)
.
Tumor Model and Treatments.
Mice were each given i.p. 1.0 ml of PBS containing 1 x 106 B16F10 melanoma cells. Tumor-bearing mice were then assigned randomly to experimental groups, the members of which were each treated i.p. 1 and 8 days later with 1.0 ml of a test or control formulation. All formulations were administered within 2 h of preparation. Whether administered as Taxotere or in oil droplets, the amount of docetaxel per test injection was 400 µg, i.e.,
25 mg·kg-1 mouse body weight. Unless specified otherwise, there were nine mice in each group.
Analysis of Antitumor Efficacy Data.
The number of mice surviving in an experimental group was monitored as a function of time after tumor cell implantation. Results of survival studies were plotted as percentage of original animals remaining alive versus day after tumor implantation. For the purposes of intergroup comparison, the %ILS attributable to a treatment was defined as: [(median days of survival of treated group - median days of survival of PBS-F68-treated group)/median days of survival of PBS-F68-treated group] x 100%.
Statistical significances of differences in the survivals of the various treatment groups were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Animals that were still alive 220 days after tumor cell implantation were censored from analysis.
Demonstration of Fibrin(ogen) in Tumor Tissue.
Mice that had each received 1.0 x 106 B16F10 cells either i.p. or s.c. 710 days earlier were deeply anesthetized, and then sacrificed using cervical dislocation. Specimens of solid tumor were removed and then either embedded in Histo Prep (FisherDiagnostics, Fairlawn, NJ) and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, or formalin fixed and embedded in paraffin. Frozen specimens were cut into thin sections and immunostained for fibrin(ogen), and paraffin-embedded specimens were cut into thin sections and stained for fibrin using the traditional histochemical technique of Lendrum et al. (15)
.
In another experiment, two mice each received s.c. injection in the right flank with 0.3 ml of PBS containing 1 x 106 B16F10 cells. Fourteen days later, when the resulting tumors in the mice had each grown to
1 cm3, the animals were each given via a lateral tail vein a 0.3-ml inoculum of PBS containing 1.7 mg of 125I-fibrinogen of specific activity 2.4 x 106 cpm·mg-1. Six h later, the animals were euthanized, and the tumors were excised from the carcasses. As control tissues, full thickness blocks of normal skin (
1 cm2) were excised from the left flanks of the animals. After weighing the tumors and blocks of skin, the radioactivities associated with them were measured. Subsequently, the radioactivity in a tissue was normalized by dividing it by the weight of the corresponding tissue.
Extraction and Quantification of Docetaxel from Tumor Tissue.
Three mice that had each received 1.0 x 106 B16F10 melanoma cells 16 days earlier were each given an i.p. inoculum containing 400 µg of docetaxel. One animal received the drug as Taxotere, another received the drug within fibrinogen-free oil droplets, and the last received the drug within fibrinogen-coated oil droplets. Two h after having received the drug, the mice were sacrificed using cervical dislocation. Representative blocks of tumor from within the abdominal cavity of each animal were harvested, rinsed extensively using deionized water, weighed, and then homogenized in 2.0 ml of water. To 1.0 ml of homogenate were added 4.0 ml of ethyl acetate. The resulting mixture was vortexed for 5.0 min, after which the organic phase was decanted and placed in a clean glass tube. That tube was placed in a heating block, where the solvent was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. The nonvolatile material remaining in the tube was then dissolved in 200 µl of acetonitrile:water (50:50, v/v) for analysis using HPLC.
For analysis of docetaxel extracted from tissue homogenates, we used a HPLC procedure slightly different from that which was referenced above. One hundred µl of sample were applied to a C18 reverse-phase column (particle size, 10 µm) of dimensions 3.9 x 300 mm (µBondapack; Waters Corp.). Acetonitrile:water (50:50, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml·min-1 was used as eluent. Absorbance at 230 nm was used to detect docetaxel eluting from the column. Known amounts of docetaxel in 100-µl aliquots of acetonitrile:water (50:50, v/v) were used as external standards and to calibrate the assay. The area of the absorbance peak that was centered about a retention time of
13.23 min was linearly proportional to docetaxel content. Using this procedure, the interday coefficient of variation for the measurement of docetaxel over the range of 0.055.0 µM varied from 4% to 10%. After correcting for the total volumes of the various samples, data were recorded as the docetaxel content of a tissue, in picomoles, divided by the tissues wet weight, in milligrams.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1:22 (v/v). As we progressed to studies in vivo, however, we realized that much larger doses of drug in a relatively small volume of total inoculum would be needed. Thus, control and test oil droplets for use in vivo were prepared from mixtures in which the oil:water ratio was 2:3 (v/v).
Size distributions of fibrinogen-coated, docetaxel-loaded oil droplets are shown in Fig. 1
. The figure shows droplets prepared 2 and 24 h earlier using oil:water ratios of either 1:22 or 2:3. Although the distributions overlap, they are not superimposable. Droplets made from the oil-poor mixture are smaller, on average, than those made from the oil-rich mixture. From absorbance measurements, we determined that
70% of the fibrinogen binds to droplets of the oil-poor preparation, and
93% of the fibrinogen binds to droplets of the oil-rich preparation. During storage at 4°C for 24 h, the droplets form cream layers that can be redispersed by simple agitation. The distributions shift somewhat to the left after 24 h due, perhaps, to the dissociation of aggregates of droplets formed during the fibrinogen-coating process. In support of that proposal, the distribution of a preparation of fibrinogen-free, docetaxel-loaded oil droplets made using the oil-rich mixture 2 h before sizing was virtually the same as that of fibrinogen-coated droplets after 24 h (data not shown). Given the apparent mean diameters (24 h) of fibrinogen-coated droplets from the oil-poor (2.14 ± 1.16 µm) and oil-rich (11.99 ± 11.93 µm) preparations, we estimate that the packing density of the protein was about the same on droplets from either preparation,
55007500 Å2·molecule-1. Such a result is consistent with end-on binding of the elongate fibrinogen molecule (16)
.
|
|
Inhibition of the anchorage-dependent growth of cells was used as another indication of cytotoxicity in vitro. For this purpose, 1-day-old monolayer cultures of MCF-7 cells and B16F10 cells were treated with various materials for 48 h. We used only a single concentration of docetaxel, 5.0 nM, to assess the effect of the drug on the growth of MCF-7 cells. Whereas neither DMSO alone nor fibrinogen-coated oil droplets alone had any effect on cell growth, all docetaxel-containing formulations had a significant inhibitory effect. Once again, docetaxel administered in either fibrinogen-free or fibrinogen-coated oil droplets yielded significant, equivalent reductions in cell growth (30.4 ± 0.3% and 30.9 ± 0.5%, respectively). Those reductions, in turn, were significantly less than that yielded by DMSO-solubilized docetaxel (45.3 ± 0.7%). In the case of B16F10 cells, dose-response profiles relating to the various formulations were generated (Fig. 3)
. Whereas neither DMSO alone nor fibrinogen-coated oil droplets alone had any effect on tumor cell growth, docetaxel-containing formulations did inhibit cell growth in dose-dependent fashion. At all concentrations of docetaxel tested, the drug in olive oil droplets inhibited growth considerably. Once again, the presence of fibrinogen on the droplets made little or no difference to the observed cytotoxic effect. When fitting the data sets to various mathematic schemes, we found that each fit well an equation that relates, in double hyperbolic fashion, the observed adherent cells to docetaxel concentration, i.e., y =
/(1 + x/ß) + (100 -
)/(1 + x/
), where y is the observed adherent cells, x is the docetaxel concentration, and
, ß, and
are constants. Taken at face value, such fits suggest that two populations of adherent cells exist, one of which is more sensitive to docetaxel than the other.
|
), where y is the observed clonogenic response, x is the concentration of docetaxel, and
is a constant equivalent to the concentration of drug that inhibits the clonogenic response by 50%. The
s of these fits are relatively close to the ßs of the fits of the growth inhibition assay (see above and the legends for Figs. 3
|
Association of Docetaxel with Cultured Tumor Cells.
Fig. 5
shows the time dependencies of the association of docetaxel with cultured B16F10 cells after application of the drug in either DMSO or fibrinogen-coated oil droplets. After applying docetaxel in either of the two vehicles, there was an initial rapid rise in cell-associated drug, followed by a decay in drug level to an apparent equilibrium value. Although somewhat limited in number, the data points suggest that the approach to equilibrium may be slower for docetaxel applied in fibrinogen-coated oil droplets than for docetaxel applied in DMSO.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of our preliminary studies were most gratifying. We found, first, that incorporating docetaxel into micronized oil droplets did not limit in vitro the cytotoxicity of the drug. We showed, next, that melanoma-bearing mice treated with docetaxel-loaded, fibrinogen-coated oil droplets survived much longer (%ILS = 360) than melanoma-bearing mice treated similarly with docetaxel administered as Taxotere (%ILS = 40). We conclude that fibrinogen-coated oil droplets are a more effective means by which to deliver docetaxel to melanoma growing in the abdominal cavity of a mouse than is Taxotere.
Because docetaxel administered in fibrinogen-free olive oil droplets also significantly prolonged survival (%ILS = 230), we cannot, at this time, attribute the survival benefit of the oil formulations solely to the presence of droplet-bound fibrinogen. It is entirely possible that the surfactant-stabilized oil phase acts synergistically with the drug to confer anticancer activity. As one of many plausible explanations for such a synergism, the benefit of the "naked" oil droplets may derive from an ability to interfere with the efflux of docetaxel from tumor cells (13 , 19) . It might also be the consequence of a simple depot effect. We favor and are focusing on another explanation, however; one that still invokes a role for adsorbed fibrinogen. Our experience with micronized particles of hydrophobic phases in contact with various fibrinogen-containing body fluids (11 , 16 , 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) has taught us that the protein invariably adsorbs from those fluids to the particles. Thus, when introduced into a tumor-filled abdominal cavity, fibrinogen-free droplets of olive oil become coated with fibrinogen in situ.4 We are now using various means to test the hypothesis that such a coating is equivalent operationally to one that is applied to the droplets before they are administered parenterally. We are also modifying the formulations so as to make the droplets smaller and to optimize the fibrinogen packing density.
We are not the first to use fibrinogen as a component of a vehicle designed to deliver anticancer agents. Other investigators have covalently conjugated fibrinogen to methotrexate (25) or encapsulated various anticancer drugs within microspheres composed entirely of fibrinogen (26, 27, 28) . The aim of the latter investigators was not to target the drugs to tumors but to create a biodegradable, sustained-release reservoir that could be loaded with an otherwise toxic amount of drug. In fact, fibrinogen microspheres worked well as drug reservoirs. Their ability to target tumors specifically, however, was never addressed.
We believe the docetaxel formulation described in this report will, in many circumstances, have greater therapeutic efficacy against fibrin(ogen)-rich tumors than does the existing commercial formulation, i.e., Taxotere. Furthermore, because the new formulation favors sites of fibrin(ogen) deposition, less total drug and/or less frequent drug dosing may be required for tumor treatment. This last possibility might limit drug-related side effects. We are now using other dosing regimens and various tumor models to address these issues.
Much remains to be determined regarding the general applicability of the new formulation to the treatment of solid tumors. The dependence of the preparations antitumor efficacy on its route of administration is not yet known. The cancer model described by us here was one in which the tumor was confined, at least macroscopically, to the abdominal cavity. Such confinement was conducive to i.p. administration of the droplets. Indeed, other fibrin(ogen)-rich, docetaxel-sensitive tumors, when confined to the abdominal or other cavity, e.g., the pleural cavity, may also respond favorably to local application. When given i.v., however, fibrinogen-coated droplets of olive oil are retained not only at a site of fibrin(ogen) deposition but also within organs of the reticuloendothelial system (1) . Thus, delivery of drug-loaded droplets via an i.v. route to tumors in some anatomical locations may be less than optimal. On the other hand, i.v. delivery of droplets to tumors in the lungs, liver, spleen, and lymph nodes may be especially good. Finally, if a tumor is relatively large, intralesional application of the coated oil droplets may represent another route of administration, regardless of the tumors anatomical location.
We have not yet determined what, if any, side effects are associated with the new formulation. One potential side effect may be the development of humoral and/or cellular immune responses directed against fibrinogen, a protein critical to coagulation. In the experiments reported here, we used human fibrinogen to coat the droplets. The use of human fibrinogen was driven by a financial consideration: murine fibrinogen from commercial source was prohibitively expensive. Although we noted no overt manifestation of a change in the coagulation status of treated animals, the potential for such a change still exists. For that reason, it will be necessary to determine whether fibrinogen-coated olive oil droplets elicit antifibrinogen antibodies and/or cell-mediated immune responses in recipient animals and, if so, whether any such responses are associated with changes in the coagulation status of the recipients and/or contribute to therapeutic efficacy. We are also exploring the influences of solution-phase fibrinogen and both procoagulants and anticoagulants on the response to the drug-loaded droplets.
In closing, we have demonstrated the anticancer activity of docetaxel-loaded, fibrinogen-coated droplets of olive oil. We are confident other liquid hydrophobic phases and/or lipophilic agents can be used to formulate fibrinogen-coated microparticles that are equally, or even more, efficacious in the treatment of tumors and/or other lesions associated with fibrin(ogen) deposition. We are particularly excited by the prospect that this formulation could be used to target a mixture of mechanistically dissimilar chemotherapeutic agents to fibrin(ogen)-rich sites. We hope in the near future to develop several such formulations and assess their therapeutic utility using various model systems.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by grants to P. B. D. and G. S. R. from Aventis and the Ruth Lyons Cancer Fund and by a grant to G. S. R. from the Komen Foundation for Breast Cancer Research. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at College of Pharmacy, 3223 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0004. Phone: (513) 558-3870; Fax: (513) 558-0978; ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; %ILS, percentage increase in life span. ![]()
4 C. M. Einhaus et al. Fibrinogen-coated droplets of olive oil for delivery of docetaxel to a fibrin(ogen)-rich ascites form a murine mammary tumor, submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 3/ 7/03. Revised 8/25/03. Accepted 8/26/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ski J., Opolski A., Wietrzyk J., Górski A., Radzikowski C. Cytotoxic and antitumor effect of fibrinogen-methotrexate conjugate. Cancer Lett., 148: 189-195, 2000.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Einhaus, A. C. Retzinger, A. O. Perrotta, M. D. Dentler, A. S. Jakate, P. B. Desai, and G. S. Retzinger Fibrinogen-Coated Droplets of Olive Oil for Delivery of Docetaxel to a Fibrin(ogen)-Rich Ascites Form of a Murine Mammary Tumor Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 7001 - 7010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |