| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
B Signaling
Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B was constitutively active in all of the cell lines and was inhibited by 17-AAG. Down-regulation of NF-
B transactivation by pharmacological inhibitors enhanced oxaliplatin cytotoxicity. These data support an interaction between 17-AAG and components of the NF-
B pathway in the modulation of oxaliplatin sensitivity in colon cancer cells. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous work (3)
, we have shown cell line-dependent interactions between cisplatin and the benzoquinone ansamycins geldanamycin and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) in colon cancer cells. The ansamycins act by blocking the binding of ATP to the chaperone protein Hsp90 (Mr 90,000 heat shock protein), an action that results in destabilization of the Hsp90-client protein complexes and subsequent proteasomal degradation of the client proteins ErbB2, Raf, Akt, and others (reviewed in Refs. 4
and 5
). The inhibitory effects of geldanamycin on transcriptional activation through activator protein 1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor (NF)-
B have also been shown (6
, 7)
. Previously, we demonstrated the role of p53/Fas/caspase 8/caspase 3 pathways in cisplatin-induced apoptosis in the HCT116 cell line (3)
. In an extension of this work, we found that the differential effects of the combination of 17-AAG and cisplatin among cell lines depend on quantitative inhibition of signaling through c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) by 17-AAG.1
In this study, we demonstrated that the combination of oxaliplatin and 17-AAG is at least additive in colon cancer cell lines, and that the effect of oxaliplatin is independent of the JNK pathway activation, whereas signaling through p38 appeared to be an important mediator of cytotoxicity. Finally, we report that in the human colon cancer cell lines, 17-AAG inhibits the activity of transcription factor NF-
B through the abrogation of upstream components of the NF-
B pathway, and that this phenomenon shifts the balance from cell survival to cell death in response to oxaliplatin treatment.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, caffeic acid phenethyl ester and helenalin (BioSource International, Inc., Camarillo, CA), were dissolved as recommended by the manufacturers, aliquoted, and stored at -20°C.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Assay and Isobologram Analysis.
MTT assays and isobologram analysis were carried out as described in Ref. 3
. Cells were plated in 96-well plates and treated with various concentrations of oxaliplatin and 17-AAG alone and in combination or with oxaliplatin in the presence of chemical inhibitors. Cytotoxicity was measured using a standard MTT assay after drug exposure for 72 h. Data were derived from at least three independent experiments (in triplicate) for the oxaliplatin/17-AAG combination and from two independent experiments for oxaliplatin with signaling inhibitors. IC50 values for oxaliplatin, 17-AAG, or oxaliplatin in the presence of chemical inhibitors were determined as described by Tsai et al. (8)
. The cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and 17-AAG in combination was quantified according to the method of Chou et al. (9)
.
Colony Forming Assay.
For clonogenic assays, cells were plated in 6-well plates at a density of 250 cells/well, and after 24 h, oxaliplatin and 17-AAG or chemical inhibitors, alone or in combination, were added for 72 h. Oxaliplatin and 17-AAG were used at the concentrations corresponding to IC25 values for each drug, derived from the clonogenic assays. After addition of fresh media, cells were cultivated for 710 days; colonies (>50 cells) were then fixed in 75% ethanol, stained with Coomassie Blue (Sigma), and counted manually. The combination index for the clonogenic assay was determined as the ratio of the cumulative percentage of cells killed by each drug or signaling inhibitor alone to the percentage of cells killed by the combination. All experiments were performed in duplicate at least three times.
Drug and Inhibitor Concentrations.
Oxaliplatin, 17-AAG, and signaling inhibitors were used at concentrations established in preliminary experiments: they were sufficient to cause detectable responses in signaling and apoptotic pathways after 24 h of treatment (oxaliplatin and 17-AAG) or sufficient inhibitory activity in the absence of significant cytotoxicity after 72 h of incubation (inhibitors). By these criteria, all of the chemical inhibitors were used at a concentration of 3 µM (except helenalin, which was used at 0.3 µM) and added 1 h before oxaliplatin. For Western blot analysis and caspase assays, cells were plated 24 h before the addition of drugs and cultured for another 24 h. Oxaliplatin was used at concentrations equivalent to 25x IC50 derived from MTT assay: 15 µM for HT29, SW480, and HCT116 cell lines and 50 µM for DLD1cell line. 17-AAG was used at 200 nM for HT29 cells and 500 nM for the rest of the panel (equivalent to 20x IC50 and 10x IC50, respectively). 0.01% DMSO was used as a control. For analysis of DNA fragmentation, a 24-h exposure to both drugs at concentrations of 2.5x IC50 was carried out: oxaliplatin was used at 1.5 µM for HT29, SW480, and HCT116 cell lines and 5 µM for DLD1cell line; 17-AAG was used at 30 nM for HT29 cells and 150 nM for the rest of the panel.
Quantitative Analysis of the DNA Fragmentation.
A photometric two-step ELISA (Cell Death Detection ELISA; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) that detects cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments was used according to the manufacturers instructions. Aliquots of cytoplasmic lysates, corresponding to 4000 cells/reaction, were analyzed. Color development was quantified using a Universal Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.) at 405 nm. Comparison of the absorbance of the treated sample with an untreated control determined the extent of DNA fragmentation. All experiments were performed three times in duplicate.
Caspase Assay.
ApoTarget caspase colorimetric protease assay kits were purchased from BioSource International, Inc. Assays were carried out according to the manufacturers recommendations, as described previously (3)
. All experiments were performed at least three times in duplicate.
Protein Extract Preparation and Western Blotting.
Protein extracts were prepared as described previously (6)
. Western blotting was carried out according to a standard procedure using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and the ECL+Plus detection system (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Immunoblotting with ß-actin antibodies was performed to confirm equal protein loading. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal antibodies against phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phospho-c-Jun; rabbit polyclonal antibodies against ERK, JNK, and p38; and goat polyclonal antibodies against ß-actin (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against AKT and I
B kinases (IKKs) and against phosphorylated forms of JNK, p38, AKT, IKKs, activating transcription factor 2, and p65/Rel (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against mitogen-activated extracellular protein kinase kinase kinase (MEKK3) and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 were purchased from PharMingen (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA).
Transfection and Luciferase Reporter Assay.
All reporter plasmids were purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Cells were transfected using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche) with AP-1-Luc reporter or NF-
B-Luc reporter, in combination with pRL-CMV vector purchased from Promega. Twenty-four h after transfection, cells were treated with drugs as described above, lysed, and subjected to luciferase assays using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega), according to the manufacturers protocol, on the TD20/20 tube luminometer (Turner Design, Sunnyvale, CA). The relative light units were calculated as ratio of Firefly luciferase luminescence to Renilla luciferase luminescence. Nonspecific luciferase activation determined in parallel experiments with pCIS-CK (control vector) was deducted. Comparison of the relative light units of the treated samples with the relative light units of untreated controls reflected the degree of induction of transcriptional activity. All experiments were performed three times in duplicate.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of combining oxaliplatin and 17-AAG were analyzed using two approaches: MTT assays, followed by isobologram analysis (isobolograms not shown); and clonogenic assays. Combination indices were calculated based on the results of both. The MTT assays demonstrated additivity in HCT116, SW480, and DLD1 but antagonism in HT29 (Table 1)
. By contrast, analysis of the clonogenic assay data showed additivity in three cell lines and, by conventional definition, synergy in HCT116. The latter assay is thought to afford a more accurate assessment of cell survival because this methodology eliminates the contribution of cells that have been growth arrested or have committed to cell death before actual apoptosis.
|
|
It should also be considered that necrosis as a means of cell death may be playing a role with oxaliplatin. In the previously alluded to study (10) of the irinotecan/oxaliplatin combination in HT29 cells, a larger proportion of necrotic than apoptotic cell death occurred in response to oxaliplatin (5 µM over 24 h). This observation is consistent with an unexpected dissonance in the levels of caspase 3 activation induced by cisplatin and oxaliplatin in these four colon cancer cell lines. As shown previously (3) ,1 cisplatin (although less toxic against these cell lines, based on higher IC50 values), when used at 10x IC50 concentration, induced the same or higher relative levels of caspase 3 activation than oxaliplatin at 25x IC50. Therefore, whereas with cisplatin, an apoptotic mechanism of cell death appears to predominate, both apoptotic and necrotic mechanisms have a role in oxaliplatin cytotoxicity.
Oxaliplatin-Induced JNK and p38 Activation Exerts Different Effects on Colon Cancer Cell Lines: p38 Activation Causes Cell Death.
To further investigate the mechanism of the additive interaction between 17-AAG and oxaliplatin, we used two approaches: first, we used high concentrations of both drugs to allow detection of the effects of 17-AAG on signal transduction pathways related to apoptosis; and second, we investigated the roles of three major kinase cascades relevant to oxaliplatin cytotoxicity by using selective pharmacological inhibitors of these pathways.
Among the cellular responses to treatment with platinum compounds is activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades (reviewed in Ref. 12
), especially JNK and p38 (3)
. The conflicting reports regarding the role of these pathways in mediating cytotoxicity have been a source of controversy (reviewed in Ref. 13
). As shown in Fig. 2A
, in all four colon cancer cell lines, oxaliplatin induced phosphorylation of both JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, with consequent phosphorylation of two major components of the AP-1 transcription factor, c-Jun and activating transcription factor 2. A functional assay using a luciferase reporter confirms the activation of AP-1 signaling by oxaliplatin (Fig. 2B)
. 17-AAG demonstrated selective effects on oxaliplatin-induced signaling through these pathways: phospho-JNK, c-Jun and activating transcription factor 2 were completely depleted; and AP-1 transactivation was inhibited, whereas p38 phosphorylation was not affected (Fig. 2, A and B)
. The total protein level of JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase was unchanged. These observations indicate that in our cellular model, activation of the JNK rather than p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase induces the activation of AP-1 transcriptional factor. The same finding was reported recently for breast carcinoma cells (14)
.
|
To explore the role of individual strands of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in oxaliplatin-induced cell death we used selective inhibitors and examined their effects on cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin. As shown in Table 2
, in all cell lines, inhibition of JNK by the selective inhibitor SP600125 (15)
demonstrated additivity (MTT assay) or very slight antagonism (clonogenic assays). Inhibition of p38 kinase by SB203580, on the other hand, markedly increased cellular resistance to oxaliplatin. This observation strongly suggests that p38 kinase activation is one of the major factors in oxaliplatin-induced cell death in colon cancer cell lines, when the JNK activation might play a role in the both apoptotic and antiapoptotic cellular responses.
|
We tested the effects of pharmacological inhibition of both ERK and AKT pathways on oxaliplatin-induced cell death, using either LY294002, specific inhibitor of PI3K, or UO126, selective mitogen-activated extracellular protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor. As shown in Table 2
, despite an additive effect of both inhibitors in the MTT assay, the clonogenic assay showed that inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway was associated with resistance to oxaliplatin rather than with cell sensitization. As has been described, AKT transmits survival signals through phosphorylation-dependent suppression of intracellular proapoptotic factors mostly related to mitochondrial apoptosis (reviewed in Ref. 17
). As noted above, in the colon cancer cell lines, we did not detect the activation of caspase 9 after oxaliplatin treatment. This suggests a relatively insignificant role for the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in oxaliplatin-induced cell death. We believe that this might explain why down-regulation of the PI3K pathway does not increase the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in this model of colon cancer.
17-AAG Inhibits the Transcriptional Activity of NF-
B in Colon Cancer Cell Lines and Consequently Increases Oxaliplatin-Induced Cytotoxicity.
One of the major prosurvival cellular responses is the activation of NF-
B (18)
. Inhibition of this pathway has already been shown to provide a molecular target for anticancer therapy (reviewed in Refs. 19
and 20
). Signaling to NF-
B occurs through the activation of IKKs, which phosphorylate I
B, leading to the release and nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-
B; alternatively, NF-
B itself is subject to an I
B-independent regulation through phosphorylation by different kinases that increases NF-
B-induced gene expression (reviewed in Ref. 21
). Geldanamycin (7)
, of which 17 AAG is an analogue, inhibits tumor necrosis factor-induced NF-
B activation through proteasomal degradation of receptor-interacting protein; the role of this tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-interacting protein in DNA damage-induced IKK activation was reported recently (22)
. We have found that high basal activation of NF-
B in HT29 and HCT116 cell lines is linked to MEKK3 expression.2
All of these findings led us to investigate the effects of oxaliplatin and 17-AAG on NF-
B activation in colon carcinomas and to evaluate the impact of NF-
B down-regulation on oxaliplatin-induced cytotoxicity. As shown in Fig. 3A
, all of the colon cancer cell lines demonstrated constitutive activity of signaling to NF-
B, including active expression of MEKK3 and phosphorylation of IKK subunits. To determine the relevance of these observations for the subsequent activation of NF-
B, we assessed the phosphorylation status of the Rel A/p65 NF-
B subunit, which has been suggested to reflect NF-
B transactivation ability (21)
, and the expression of a known NF-
B transcriptional target, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (23)
. We also used a luciferase reporter assay for a definitive confirmation of NF-
B activation status. As shown in Fig. 3B
, NF-
B activation strongly correlated with the levels of IKK and p65 phosphorylation, as well as with cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 expression. No significant NF-
B induction after oxaliplatin treatment was detected in three of the four colon cancer cell lines. However, in HCT116, oxaliplatin was an inducer of NF-
B activation, as evident from the reporter assay and immunoblots demonstrating upstream activation of MEKK3, IKK
, and IKKß and phosphorylation of p65 (Fig. 3, A and B)
. HCT116 is different from the three other cell lines in its p53 status, and only in this cell line was a high level of cisplatin-induced Fas activation demonstrated (3)
. We detected a similar activation of Fas when these cells were treated with oxaliplatin (data not shown). As was found recently for colon cancer cells, activated Fas can function not only as an inducer of apoptosis but also as an activator of NF-
B by a mechanism that appears to be distinct from that used by tumor necrosis factor
(24)
. This suggested that Fas might activate competing cell death and survival pathways in HCT116. In all of the colon cancer cell lines, 17-AAG-dependent abrogation of MEKK3 expression correlated with strong inhibition of IKKs and of p65 phosphorylation, as well as with down-regulation of NF-
B transactivation and of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 expression, whereas protein levels of IKK
and IKKß were affected to a lesser degree (Fig. 3, A and B)
. Protein level of receptor-interacting protein was also significantly decreased (data not shown).
|
B activation in a cellular model of colon cancer. To determine the importance of this action of 17-AAG for oxaliplatin-induced cytotoxicity, we used two known NF-
B inhibitors, caffeic acid phenethyl ester and helenalin. As shown in Table 2
B signaling cascade followed by down-regulation of NF-
B transcriptional activity is a major factor determining the positive interaction between oxaliplatin and 17-AAG in combination. One might predict that 17-AAG may be of value in other settings in which NF-
B signaling is a determinant of sensitivity.
NF-
B is constitutively expressed in a wide range of tumor cells, where it commonly promotes cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis induced by genotoxic agents (19
, 20)
. Therefore, a reasonable strategy for cancer treatment may be to combine chemotherapy with compounds active against NF-
B. Clinical trials of such interventions are in progress in several tumor types (20)
. We noted above that the cytotoxic effects of oxaliplatin are enhanced when it is administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil (1
, 2)
. The ability of 5-fluorouracil to suppress the activation of NF-
B has been reported recently (25)
. These findings support an effort to increase the activity of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer by such targeted interventions.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Peter J. ODwyer, University of Pennsylvania, 1020 BRB II/III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104. Phone: (215) 662-8632; Fax: (215) 243-3269; E-mail: peter.odwyer{at}uphs.upenn.edu
1 I. A. Vasilevskaya, T. V. Rakitina, and P. J. ODwyer. Quantitative effects on JNK signaling determine synergistic interaction of cisplatin and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in colon cancer cell lines, Mol. Pharmacol., in press, 2004. ![]()
2 C. W. Nho, and P. J. ODwyer. NF-
B activation by the chemopreventive dithiolethione oltipraz is exerted through stimulation of MEKK3 signaling, submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 7/22/03. Revised 10/ 2/03. Accepted 10/15/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 10519-10526, 2000.
B and I
B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 14: 649-683, 1996.[Medline]
B as a target for cancer drug development. Leukemia (Baltimore), 16: 1053-1068, 2002.
B as a therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Mol. Med., 8: 385-389, 2002.[Medline]
B puzzle. Cell, 109: S81-S96, 2002.
B activation. Genes Dev., 17: 873-882, 2003.
B antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science (Wash. DC), 281: 1680-1683, 1998.
B is mediated by the inhibition of I
B kinase activity in human salivary gland cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 282: 292-296, 2001.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. A. Vasilevskaya, M. Selvakumaran, and P. J. O'Dwyer Disruption of Signaling through SEK1 and MKK7 Yields Differential Responses in Hypoxic Colon Cancer Cells Treated with Oxaliplatin Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2008; 74(1): 246 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moser, S. A. Lang, S. Kainz, A. Gaumann, S. Fichtner-Feigl, G. E. Koehl, H. J. Schlitt, E. K. Geissler, and O. Stoeltzing Blocking heat shock protein-90 inhibits the invasive properties and hepatic growth of human colon cancer cells and improves the efficacy of oxaliplatin in p53-deficient colon cancer tumors in vivo Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2007; 6(11): 2868 - 2878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Scartozzi, I. Bearzi, C. Pierantoni, A. Mandolesi, F. Loupakis, A. Zaniboni, V. Catalano, A. Quadri, F. Zorzi, R. Berardi, et al. Nuclear Factor-kB Tumor Expression Predicts Response and Survival in Irinotecan-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab-Irinotecan Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3930 - 3935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. O'Dwyer, S. G. Eckhardt, D. G. Haller, J. Tepper, D. Ahnen, S. Hamilton, A. B. Benson III, M. Rothenberg, N. Petrelli, H.-J. Lenz, et al. Priorities in Colorectal Cancer Research: Recommendations From the Gastrointestinal Scientific Leadership Council of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2313 - 2321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, W. Ju, J. Renouard, J. Aden, S. A. Belinsky, and Y. Lin 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin Synergistically Potentiates Tumor Necrosis Factor-Induced Lung Cancer Cell Death by Blocking the Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1089 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |