Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Camp, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Camp, R. L.
[Cancer Research 63, 1101-1105, March 1, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Tissue Microarray Analysis of Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Met Pathway Components Reveals a Role for Met, Matriptase, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator Inhibitor 1 in the Progression of Node-negative Breast Cancer1

Jung Y. Kang, Marisa Dolled-Filhart, Idris Tolgay Ocal, Baljit Singh, Chen-Yong Lin, Robert B. Dickson, David L. Rimm and Robert L. Camp2

Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 [J. Y. K., M. D-F., I. T. O., D. L. R., R. L. C.], and Lombardi Cancer Center, Departments of Oncology and Pathology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007 [B. S., C-Y. L., R. B. D.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Numerous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of Met, the hepatocyte growth factor(HGF) receptor, plays an important role in tumorigenesis. Met activation can either occur through ligand-independent or -dependent mechanisms, both of which are mediated by a series of proteases and modulators. We studied the protein expression of several components of the HGF/Met pathway on a cohort of 330 node-negative breast carcinomas using a tissue microarray annotated with 30-year, disease-specific patient follow-up data. We examined HGF, matriptase (an activator of HGF expressed on mammary epithelial cell surfaces), HAI-I (the cognate inhibitor of matriptase), and the Met receptor itself. Our studies demonstrate tight correlation between the expression of HGF, matriptase, and Met in breast carcinoma. High-level expression of Met, matriptase, and HAI-I were associated with poor patient outcome. Met and HAI-I showed independent prognostic value when compared with traditional breast markers in a multivariate analysis. Intriguingly, antibodies against the intracellular but not the extracellular domain of Met were prognostic, suggesting that overexpression of the cytoplasmic-tail of Met, perhaps through cleavage or truncating mutation, may play an important role in breast cancer progression.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Many studies have demonstrated the importance of the HGF3 pathway in carcinogenesis (1) . HGF is produced both by tumor cells as well as by surrounding stromal elements, and can act in either a paracrine or autocrine fashion (2, 3, 4, 5) . HGF is secreted as an inactive propeptide, which must be cleaved to become biologically active. One enzyme responsible for this cleavage is matriptase, an epithelial-localized transmembrane serine protease (6, 7, 8) . Matriptase is, in turn, regulated by a naturally occurring inhibitor, HAI-1 (9 , 10) . When cleaved, HGF can bind to its receptor, Met, thereby stimulating multiple downstream pathways, leading to mitogenesis, motogenesis, and morphogenesis (11) .

Several studies have analyzed individual components of the HGF pathway for their association with tumor aggression and/or patient survival. Early biochemical studies demonstrated that overall levels of HGF in breast cancers correlated with worse patient outcome (2 , 3 , 5) . Whether HGF production by tumors and/or surrounding stroma is an important prognostic feature is unclear; although tumor cells themselves are a major producer of HGF (4 , 5 , 12) . The use of matriptase and HAI-1 as prognostic markers in breast cancer has not been reported previously. However, recently, one study demonstrated that high matriptase and low HAI-1 levels were associated with advanced-stage ovarian tumors (13) . Another report demonstrated that the glycosylation of matriptase stabilized and enhanced its proteolytic activity, and promoted tumor aggression (14) .

The expression of Met has been more extensively studied. Met overexpression associates with poor prognosis in a variety of tumors (1) . Whether such expression is ligand- (HGF) dependent or independent is unclear; however, the constitutive activation of Met, via several ligand-independent mechanisms, is established. These mechanisms include activating point mutations (15, 16, 17, 18, 19) , chromosomal translocations (20 , 21) , and truncations of the cytoplasmic domain (22 , 23) . In addition, dysregulation of Met-associated phosphatases may also lead to Met activation (24) .

We have now studied several elements of the HGF pathway including HGF, matriptase, HAI-1, and Met in a single cohort of node-negative breast cancer patients with 30-year follow-up, correlating the expression of each element and determining their prognostic value. This study was facilitated by the use of tissue microarrays: arrays of hundreds of patient histological samples on a single glass slide. Our study demonstrates a significant correlation between members of the HGF pathway and shows that several members have independent prognostic value in determining patient outcome.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cohort Design and Tissue Microarray Construction.
Tissue microarrays were constructed, as described previously, and reviewed recently (25 , 26) . Three hundred and thirty cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, node-negative breast carcinoma were obtained from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Yale University. Cases were taken sequentially, as available, from 1962 to 1980, with a median survival time of 15.6 years. Complete treatment history is not available from this cohort, but the vast majority of patients in this era were not treated with chemotherapy. Representative tumor regions were selected for coring by a pathologist (R. L. C.). Because prior studies have demonstrated that a single core adequately represents the staining pattern of an entire slide, all of the studies were performed using a single sample of each tumor (27 , 28) . Our previous study has also demonstrated the durability of antigens from archival specimens as old as 70 years (27) . In the present study, all of the tumors demonstrated some degree of staining with one or more of the antibodies tested, demonstrating that no cases were antigenically "dead" because of fixation artifacts or tissue age.

Immunohistochemistry.
Briefly, 5-µm tissue microarray slides were deparaffinized with xylene and ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) pressure-cooking (29) . Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C, with the exception of antibodies to ERs, PRs, and Her2, which were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Monoclonal anti-matriptase and anti-HAI-1 antibodies were prepared as described previously (9 , 30) . Commercially acquired antibodies included: polyclonal (goat) anti-HGF antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); monoclonal antibody to the extracellular domain of Met (DO-24; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY); and monoclonal antibody to the intracellular domain of Met (3D4; Zymed, South San Francisco, CA). The specificities of all of the antibodies used were verified using immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Antibodies to ER, PR, and HER-2/neu were obtained from DAKO (Carpinteria, CA) and used according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Antibodies were either detected using a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for anti-HAI-1 or the DAKO Envision TM + System (DAKO) for the others. Signal from the HGF antibody was amplified using biotin-tyramide signal amplification followed by a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (TSA kit; Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA). Staining was visualized using diaminobenzidine and counterstained with acidified hematoxylin. Slides were also stained in the absence of primary antibody to evaluate nonspecific secondary antibody reactions.

Evaluation of Immunostaining.
Immunostaining was scored on a scale of 0 to 3+ (negative/weak/moderate/intense staining). Distinctions between membrane and cytoplasmic staining were impractical given the diffuse staining of the antigens (visualized using the chromogenic substrate, diaminobenzidine). Therefore, scores represent the combined staining intensity of membranous and cytoplasmic staining. Histospots with <10% of their area covered by tumor were excluded from analysis. Scoring was performed by two independent observers (J. Y. K. and M. D-F.), and histocores with discrepant scores were re-examined by both observers to achieve a consensus score. Cases with scores of 2+ or 3+ were designated as "high," whereas cases with scores of 0 or 1+ were designated as "low."

Statistical Analysis.
All of the analyses were completed using Statview 5.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Correlations between markers were performed using a {chi}2 test. Prognostic significance was assessed using both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with 30-year survival as an end point. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with significance evaluated using the Manel-Cox log rank test.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We analyzed the expression of several components of the Met pathway including HGF, matriptase, HAI-1, and Met itself (using both intracellular- and extracellular-specific antibodies; Fig. 1Citation ). The number of tumors expressing high levels of these antigens ranged from 18 to 46% (Table 1)Citation . Although tissue microarrays have been shown to adequately represent tumor antigen expression (27) , they most likely do not fully represent the expression of stromal markers. Therefore, we limited our analysis to the expression of markers by tumor cells and not stroma. In the case of HGF, this resulted in our selective study of autocrine (tumor) expression.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Immunohistochemical staining of breast cancer tissue microarrays for four members of the HGF/Met pathway. Each histospot shows a representative positive case (3+) for matriptase (A), HAI-1 (B), HGF (C), and Met (D), at low (x40) and high (x200, insets) magnification. Matriptase, HAI-1, and Met show a membrano-cytoplasmic localization, whereas HGF is predominantly cytoplasmic. The cellular localization of Met using antibodies to the intracellular and extracellular domains was comparable (D, left and right insets, respectively). Representative histospots stained using an antibody to the intracellular domain of Met and scored as 0, 1, 2, or 3+ are shown in E–H, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Marker expressiona

 
To elucidate potential associations between these markers, we performed {chi}2 analyses, which revealed highly significant associations between the expression of Met, HGF, and matriptase (P < 0.0002; Table 2Citation ). HAI-1 expression was independent of these markers, although it trended toward coexpression with matriptase (P = 0.0597). Interestingly, the expression of antibodies to the intracellular and extracellular domains of Met were highly correlated (P < 0.0001; Table 2Citation ), but not coincident; 38 cases were scored as entirely Met-extracellular negative (score of 0) and Met-intracellular high (12.2%), whereas only 1 case was judged as entirely Met-intracellular negative and Met-extracellular high (0.3%). This result suggests that relative overexpression of the intracellular domain of Met is far more common than relative overexpression of the extracellular domain.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Met pathway associations: {chi}2 analysisa

 
To determine the predictive power of the Met pathway, we initially performed a univariate analysis of individual Met pathway components and compared them with traditional breast cancer markers (Table 3)Citation . Because breast carcinoma can recur and kill patients decades after its initial diagnosis, we studied 30-year disease-related survival. Using univariate analysis, only the cytoplasmic tail of Met, not the extracellular portion, showed prognostic power (P = 0.0029; Table 3Citation ). Sixty-one percent of patients overexpressing the cytoplasmic domain of Met died of breast cancer within 30 years compared with 41% with lower levels. High-level matriptase expression was also predictive of poor outcome (51% dead of disease versus 40%; P = 0.0279; Table 3Citation ), as were elevated levels of HAI-1 (59% versus 40% survival; P = 0.0110; Table 3Citation ). Of the traditional markers of tumor aggression, only tumor size was predictive of outcome (P = 0.0001; Table 3Citation ). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that these markers were prognostic over the entire 30-year follow-up period (Fig. 2)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Univariate analysisa

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-related survival demonstrates that Met (intracellular domain), matriptase, and HAI-1 show long-term prognostic benefit. Statistical significance was assessed using the log rank test.

 
Previous studies have suggested that the ratio of HAI-1 and matriptase may play an important role in promoting tumor aggression (13) . Therefore, we compared the survival of patients with tumors expressing high and/or low levels of each. Among tumors expressing high levels of matriptase, HAI-1 coexpression predicted a worse outcome (relative risk = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.05–3.36; P = 0.0335). Comparison of tumors expressing both markers to those expressing neither demonstrated that patients with double-positive tumors have an increase relative risk of 2.43 (95% CI, 1.36–4.34; P = 0.0026). Addition of Met (cytoplasmic domain) to this analysis showed that patients with Met, matriptase, and HAI-1-positive tumors exhibit an increased relative risk of 3.25 (95% CI, 1.24–8.50; P = 0.0165).

We then determined the independent predictive power of the Met pathway. First, we limited our analysis solely to the Met pathway components. Using multivariate analysis, both the cytoplasmic tail of Met and HAI-1 retained independent predictive power (Table 4)Citation . When we included these two markers with traditional breast cancer markers, they retained their independence. Tumor size was the only other independent predictor of poor outcome (Table 5)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Multivariate analysis: Met pathwaya

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Multivariate analysis: traditional markersa

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The relative importance of ligand-dependent and ligand-independent Met activation in carcinogenesis is a matter of continued debate (1) . Our studies demonstrate that members of the HGF pathway, namely HGF, Met, and matriptase, are often coexpressed on breast cancers, and that high-level expression of two of these members, Met and matriptase, associates with more aggressive tumors. Such observations would be expected if HGF-mediated Met stimulation played a role in tumorigenesis. Although tumoral HGF levels were not found to be predictive of outcome, the expression of matriptase was prognostic in a univariate analysis, suggesting that as an activator of HGF, it plays a rate-dependent ("gate-keeping") role in the ligand-dependent stimulation of Met.

In addition to their role in the activation of HGF, matriptase and its cognate inhibitor, HAI-1, also play a role in the plasminogen activator cascade (6 , 31 , 32) . This cascade culminates in the activation of plasmin and the coactivation of matrix metalloproteinases, both of which degrade extracellular matrix components and potentiate tumor cell invasion, extravasation, and metastasis (33) . Matriptase promotes this pathway by activating latent uPA, which, in turn, activates plasmin (6 , 34) . Like matriptase, uPA can also cleave pro-HGF, providing another level of interaction between the Met/HGF pathway and plasmin cascade (35) . Given the multiple functions of matriptase, it is not surprising that aggressive breast tumors produce higher levels of this enzyme.

Likewise, HAI-1, as an inhibitor of matriptase, may help modulate both the Met/HGF and plasmin pathways. Interestingly, the expression of HAI-I was independent of the other members of the Met pathway indicating that its expression is regulated differently. Previous reports have suggested that HAI-I is down-regulated in colon carcinoma and high-grade ovarian carcinomas (13 , 36) . In contrast, our study demonstrates that HAI-1 expression is associated with aggressive breast carcinomas, being an independent predictor of poor outcome (Table 5)Citation . Although this may be puzzling in light of the role of HAI-1 in inhibiting HGF-dependent Met activation, the coordinated expression of both matriptase and HAI-1 may be far more important in promoting tumor aggression than the unopposed production of active matriptase in the absence of its inhibitor. Coordinated regulation of another inhibitor of the uPA/plasmin cascade, PAI-1, is crucial for inducing tumor invasion (37) . Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of the uPA/PAI-1 system in breast cancer demonstrated conclusively that overexpression of both uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 were associated with poor outcome in breast cancer (32) . In our study, the importance of matriptase and HAI-1 coexpression is demonstrated in the elevated relative risk of patients with tumor expressing both markers.

Because of lot-to-lot inconsistencies in polyclonal Met-antibodies,4 we analyzed two different monoclonal antibodies, one to the extracellular and one to the intracellular domain. Comparison of Met expression as assessed by these two antibodies showed some interesting results. First, the expression of the intra- and extracellular domains of Met, although highly associated, was not coincident. Second, of cases with mixed expression of intra- and extracellular Met, overexpression of the intracellular domain was far more common, with 12.2% of all of the cases expressing solely the intracellular domain. Third, high levels of the cytoplasmic tail of Met were predictive of poor outcome, whereas expression of the extracellular portion was not. Although this result could be explained by differences in the affinity of the antibodies for Met in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, both antibodies gave strong staining and similar results across a range of titrations (data not shown). A more likely explanation is that the cytoplasmic tail of Met is either cleaved (e.g., after activation) or that mutations in Met lead to an overexpression of the cytoplasmic tail in some tumors. Indeed, recent studies have suggested that the cleavage of the cytoplasmic tail of Met may be important in signal transduction (1 , 22 , 23) . Whether overexpression of the Met intracellular domain relative to the extracellular domain is a ligand-independent or -dependent phenomenon is unclear. Interestingly, expression of the Met extracellular domain correlates with HGF levels but not matriptase levels, whereas the Met intracellular domain correlates with both. This observation would be expected if the binding of matriptase-potentiated HGF to Met induced a subsequent cleavage of the Met intracellular domain.

In summary, we have made use of tissue microarray technology to analyze various components of the Met-signaling pathway. Our studies provide evidence that the expression of the stimulatory members of this pathway (Met, HGF, and matriptase) is tightly correlated. High-level HAI-1 expression is an independent predictor of outcome. Furthermore, studies using antibodies to different domains of the Met receptor suggest that overexpression of the cytoplasmic domain is a strong independent predictor of outcome.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Thomas D’Aquila and Lori Charette for their help in this effort.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by grants from the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Foundation for Medical Research, The Connecticut Breast Cancer Alliance, and grants from the NIH, including National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant K0-8 ES11571 (to R. L. C.), National Cancer Institute Grant RO-1 GM57604 (to D. L. R.), United States Army Grant DAMD 01-000436, and NIH Breast Cancer Specialized Programs of Research Excellence 2P50CA72460. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, Yale University, School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, BML 122, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: robert.camp{at}yale.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; HAI, hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; CI, confidence interval; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator; PAI, plasminogen activator inhibitor. Back

4 Unpublished observations. Back

Received 8/28/02. Accepted 1/ 3/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Danilkovitch-Miagkova A., Zbar B. Dysregulation of Met receptor tyrosine kinase activity in invasive tumors. J. Clin. Investig., 109: 863-867, 2002.[Medline]
  2. Yao Y., Jin L., Fuchs A., Joseph A., Hastings H. M., Goldberg I. D., Rosen E. M. Scatter factor protein levels in human breast cancers: clinicopathological and biological correlations.. Am. J. Pathol., 149: 1707-1717, 1996.[Abstract]
  3. Jin L., Fuchs A., Schnitt S. J., Yao Y., Joseph A., Lamszus K., Park M., Goldberg I. D., Rosen E. M. Expression of scatter factor and c-met receptor in benign and malignant breast tissue. Cancer (Phila.), 79: 749-760, 1997.[Medline]
  4. Tsao M. S., Yang Y., Marcus A., Liu N., Mou L. Hepatocyte growth factor is predominantly expressed by the carcinoma cells in non-small-cell lung cancer. Hum. Pathol., 32: 57-65, 2001.[Medline]
  5. Wang Y., Selden A. C., Morgan N., Stamp G. W., Hodgson H. J. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor expression in human mammary epithelium. Am. J. Pathol., 144: 675-682, 1994.[Abstract]
  6. Lee S. L., Dickson R. B., Lin C. Y. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor and urokinase/plasminogen activator by matriptase, an epithelial membrane serine protease. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 36720-36725, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tanimoto H., Underwood L. J., Wang Y., Shigemasa K., Parmley T. H., O’Brien T. J. Ovarian tumor cells express a transmembrane serine protease: a potential candidate for early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Tumor Biol., 22: 104-114, 2001.
  8. Oberst M., Anders J., Xie B., Singh B., Ossandon M., Johnson M., Dickson R. B., Lin C. Y. Matriptase and HAI-1 are expressed by normal and malignant epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Pathol., 158: 1301-1311, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lin C. Y., Anders J., Johnson M., Dickson R. B. Purification and characterization of a complex containing matriptase and a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from human milk. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 18237-18242, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shimomura T., Denda K., Kitamura A., Kawaguchi T., Kito M., Kondo J., Kagaya S., Qin L., Takata H., Miyazawa K., Kitamura N. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor, a novel Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 6370-6376, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Boccaccio C., Ando M., Tamagnone L., Bardelli A., Michieli P., Battistini C., Comoglio P. M. Induction of epithelial tubules by growth factor HGF depends on the STAT pathway. Nature (Lond.), 391: 285-288, 1998.[Medline]
  12. Edakuni G., Sasatomi E., Satoh T., Tokunaga O., Miyazaki K. Expression of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met pathway is increased at the cancer front in breast carcinoma. Pathol. Int., 51: 172-178, 2001.[Medline]
  13. Oberst M. D., Johnson M. D., Dickson R. B., Lin C. Y., Singh B., Stewart M., Williams A., al-Nafussi A., Smyth J. F., Gabra H., Sellar G. C. Expression of the serine protease matriptase and its inhibitor HAI-1 in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical outcome and tumor clinicopathological parameters.. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 1101-1107, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ihara S., Miyoshi E., Ko J. H., Murata K., Nakahara S., Honke K., Dickson R. B., Lin C. Y., Taniguchi N. Prometastatic effect of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V is due to modification and stabilization of active matriptase by adding ß 1–6 GlcNAc branching. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 16960-16967, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Park W. S., Dong S. M., Kim S. Y., Na E. Y., Shin M. S., Pi J. H., Kim B. J., Bae J. H., Hong Y. K., Lee K. S., Lee S. H., Yoo N. J., Jang J. J., Pack S., Zhuang Z., Schmidt L., Zbar B., Lee J. Y. Somatic mutations in the kinase domain of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor gene in childhood hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Res., 59: 307-310, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Di Renzo M. F., Olivero M., Martone T., Maffe A., Maggiora P., Stefani A. D., Valente G., Giordano S., Cortesina G., Comoglio P. M. Somatic mutations of the MET oncogene are selected during metastatic spread of human HNSC carcinomas. Oncogene, 19: 1547-1555, 2000.[Medline]
  17. Moon Y. W., Weil R. J., Pack S. D., Park W. S., Pak E., Pham T., Karkera J. D., Kim H. K., Vortmeyer A. O., Fuller B. G., Zhuang Z. Missense mutation of the MET gene detected in human glioma. Mod. Pathol., 13: 973-977, 2000.[Medline]
  18. Schmidt L., Duh F. M., Chen F., Kishida T., Glenn G., Choyke P., Scherer S. W., Zhuang Z., Lubensky I., Dean M., Allikmets R., Chidambaram A., Bergerheim U. R., Feltis J. T., Casadevall C., Zamarron A., Bernues M., Richard S., Lips C. J., Walther M. M., Tsui L. C., Geil L., Orcutt M. L., Stackhouse T., Zbar B., et al Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat. Genet., 16: 68-73, 1997.[Medline]
  19. Lee J. H., Han S. U., Cho H., Jennings B., Gerrard B., Dean M., Schmidt L., Zbar B., Vande Woude G. F. A novel germ line juxtamembrane Met mutation in human gastric cancer. Oncogene, 19: 4947-4953, 2000.[Medline]
  20. Cooper C. S., Park M., Blair D. G., Tainsky M. A., Huebner K., Croce C. M., Vande Woude G. F. Molecular cloning of a new transforming gene from a chemically transformed human cell line. Nature (Lond.), 311: 29-33, 1984.[Medline]
  21. Rodrigues G. A., Park M. Dimerization mediated through a leucine zipper activates the oncogenic potential of the met receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol., 13: 6711-6722, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Zhen Z., Giordano S., Longati P., Medico E., Campiglio M., Comoglio P. M. Structural and functional domains critical for constitutive activation of the HGF-receptor (Met). Oncogene, 9: 1691-1697, 1994.[Medline]
  23. Wallenius V., Hisaoka M., Helou K., Levan G., Mandahl N., Meis-Kindblom J. M., Kindblom L. G., Jansson J. O. Overexpression of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor (Met) and presence of a truncated and activated intracellular HGF receptor fragment in locally aggressive/malignant human musculoskeletal tumors. Am. J. Pathol., 156: 821-829, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rusciano D., Lorenzoni P., Burger M. M. Constitutive activation of c-Met in liver metastatic B16 melanoma cells depends on both substrate adhesion and cell density and is regulated by a cytosolic tyrosine phosphatase activity. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 20763-20769, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rimm D. L., Camp R. L., Charette L. A., Olsen D. A., Provost E. Amplification of tissue by construction of tissue microarrays. Exp. Mol. Pathol., 70: 255-264, 2001.[Medline]
  26. Kononen J., Bubendorf L., Kallioniemi A., Barlund M., Schraml P., Leighton S., Torhorst J., Mihatsch M. J., Sauter G., Kallioniemi O. P. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat. Med., 4: 844-847, 1998.[Medline]
  27. Camp R. L., Charette L. A., Rimm D. L. Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma. Lab. Investig., 80: 1943-1949, 2000.[Medline]
  28. Torhorst J., Bucher C., Kononen J., Haas P., Zuber M., Kochli O. R., Mross F., Dieterich H., Moch H., Mihatsch M., Kallioniemi O. P., Sauter G. Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints. Am. J. Pathol., 159: 2249-2256, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Norton A. J., Jordan S., Yeomans P. Brief, high-temperature heat denaturation (pressure cooking): a simple and effective method of antigen retrieval for routinely processed tissues.. J. Pathol., 173: 371-379, 1994.[Medline]
  30. Lin C. Y., Wang J. K., Torri J., Dou L., Sang Q. A., Dickson R. B. Characterization of a novel, membrane-bound, 80-kDa matrix-degrading protease from human breast cancer cells. Monoclonal antibody production, isolation, and localization. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 9147-9152, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Oberst M., Lin C. Y., Dickson R. B., Johnson M. Role of Proteases in Breast Cancer. J. Women Cancer, 2: 201-216, 2002.
  32. Look M. P., van Putten W. L., Duffy M. J., Harbeck N., Christensen I. J., Thomssen C., Kates R., Spyratos F., Ferno M., Eppenberger-Castori S., Sweep C. G., Ulm K., Peyrat J. P., Martin P. M., Magdelenat H., Brunner N., Duggan C., Lisboa B. W., Bendahl P. O., Quillien V., Daver A., Ricolleau G., Meijer-van Gelder M. E., Manders P., Fiets W. E., Blankenstein M. A., Broet P., Romain S., Daxenbichler G., Windbichler G., Cufer T., Borstnar S., Kueng W., Beex L. V., Klijn J. G., O’Higgins N., Eppenberger U., Janicke F., Schmitt M., Foekens J. A. Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 94: 116-128, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Andreasen P. A., Kjoller L., Christensen L., Duffy M. J. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in cancer metastasis: a review.. Int. J. Cancer, 72: 1-22, 1997.[Medline]
  34. Takeuchi T., Harris J. L., Huang W., Yan K. W., Coughlin S. R., Craik C. S. Cellular localization of membrane-type serine protease 1 and identification of protease-activated receptor-2 and single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator as substrates. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 26333-26342, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mars W. M., Zarnegar R., Michalopoulos G. K. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor by the plasminogen activators uPA and tPA. Am. J. Pathol., 143: 949-958, 1993.[Abstract]
  36. Kataoka H., Hamasuna R., Itoh H., Kitamura N., Koono M. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res., 60: 6148-6159, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Bajou K., Noel A., Gerard R. D., Masson V., Brunner N., Holst-Hansen C., Skobe M., Fusenig N. E., Carmeliet P., Collen D., Foidart J. M. Absence of host plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 prevents cancer invasion and vascularization. Nat. Med., 4: 923-928, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. Matteucci, P. Bendinelli, and M. A. Desiderio
Nuclear localization of active HGF receptor Met in aggressive MDA-MB231 breast carcinoma cells
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2009; 30(6): 937 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
K. NAKAMURA, A. HONGO, J. KODAMA, F. ABARZUA, Y. NASU, H. KUMON, and Y. HIRAMATSU
Expression of Matriptase and Clinical Outcome of Human Endometrial Cancer
Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1685 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. Bonuccelli, M. C. Casimiro, F. Sotgia, C. Wang, M. Liu, S. Katiyar, J. Zhou, E. Dew, F. Capozza, K. M. Daumer, et al.
Caveolin-1 (P132L), a Common Breast Cancer Mutation, Confers Mammary Cell Invasiveness and Defines a Novel Stem Cell/Metastasis-Associated Gene Signature
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2009; 174(5): 1650 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Fan, Q. Meng, J. J. Laterra, and E. M. Rosen
Role of Src Signal Transduction Pathways in Scatter Factor-mediated Cellular Protection
J. Biol. Chem., March 20, 2009; 284(12): 7561 - 7577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Ginty, S. Adak, A. Can, M. Gerdes, M. Larsen, H. Cline, R. Filkins, Z. Pang, Q. Li, and M. C. Montalto
The Relative Distribution of Membranous and Cytoplasmic Met Is a Prognostic Indicator in Stage I and II Colon Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3814 - 3822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Desilets, F. Beliveau, G. Vandal, F.-O. McDuff, P. Lavigne, and R. Leduc
Mutation G827R in Matriptase Causing Autosomal Recessive Ichthyosis with Hypotrichosis Yields an Inactive Protease
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10535 - 10542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. L. Shattuck, J. K. Miller, K. L. Carraway III, and C. Sweeney
Met Receptor Contributes to Trastuzumab Resistance of Her2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1471 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Milstein, C. K. Mooser, H. Hu, M. Fejzo, D. Slamon, L. Goodglick, S. Dry, and J. Colicelli
RIN1 Is a Breast Tumor Suppressor Gene
Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11510 - 11516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M.-S. Lee, I-C. Tseng, Y. Wang, K.-i. Kiyomiya, M. D. Johnson, R. B. Dickson, and C.-Y. Lin
Autoactivation of matriptase in vitro: requirement for biomembrane and LDL receptor domain
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): C95 - C105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Parr, A. J. Sanders, G. Davies, T. Martin, J. Lane, M. D. Mason, R. E. Mansel, and W. G. Jiang
Matriptase-2 Inhibits Breast Tumor Growth and Invasion and Correlates with Favorable Prognosis for Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3568 - 3576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. L. Welm, J. B. Sneddon, C. Taylor, D. S. A. Nuyten, M. J. van de Vijver, B. H. Hasegawa, and J. M. Bishop
The macrophage-stimulating protein pathway promotes metastasis in a mouse model for breast cancer and predicts poor prognosis in humans
PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7570 - 7575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. S. Bhatt, A. Welm, C. J. Farady, M. Vasquez, K. Wilson, and C. S. Craik
Coordinate expression and functional profiling identify an extracellular proteolytic signaling pathway
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5771 - 5776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. L. Shattuck, J. K. Miller, M. Laederich, M. Funes, H. Petersen, K. L. Carraway III, and C. Sweeney
LRIG1 Is a Novel Negative Regulator of the Met Receptor and Opposes Met and Her2 Synergy
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(5): 1934 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Sawada, A. R. Radjabi, N. Shinomiya, E. Kistner, H. Kenny, A. R. Becker, M. A. Turkyilmaz, R. Salgia, S. D. Yamada, G. F. Vande Woude, et al.
c-Met Overexpression Is a Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Cancer and an Effective Target for Inhibition of Peritoneal Dissemination and Invasion
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1670 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Generali, S. B. Fox, A. Berruti, J. W. Moore, M. P. Brizzi, N. Patel, G. Allevi, S. Bonardi, S. Aguggini, A. Bersiga, et al.
Regulation of Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator Inhibitor 2 by Hypoxia in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 550 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Netzel-Arnett, B. M. Currie, R. Szabo, C.-Y. Lin, L.-M. Chen, K. X. Chai, T. M. Antalis, T. H. Bugge, and K. List
Evidence for a Matriptase-Prostasin Proteolytic Cascade Regulating Terminal Epidermal Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 32941 - 32945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Pozner-Moulis, D. J. Pappas, and D. L. Rimm
Met, the Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor, Localizes to the Nucleus in Cells at Low Density
Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 7976 - 7982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
K.-i. Kiyomiya, M.-S. Lee, I-C. Tseng, H. Zuo, R. J. Barndt, M. D. Johnson, R. B. Dickson, and C.-Y. Lin
Matriptase activation and shedding with HAI-1 is induced by steroid sex hormones in human prostate cancer cells, but not in breast cancer cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): C40 - C49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Dolled-Filhart, A. McCabe, J. Giltnane, M. Cregger, R. L. Camp, and D. L. Rimm
Quantitative In situ Analysis of {beta}-Catenin Expression in Breast Cancer Shows Decreased Expression Is Associated with Poor Outcome.
Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5487 - 5494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
K. List, R. Szabo, A. Molinolo, B. S. Nielsen, and T. H. Bugge
Delineation of Matriptase Protein Expression by Enzymatic Gene Trapping Suggests Diverging Roles in Barrier Function, Hair Formation, and Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 168(5): 1513 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. A. Smolen, B. Muir, G. Mohapatra, A. Barmettler, W. J. Kim, M. N. Rivera, S. M. Haserlat, R. A. Okimoto, E. Kwak, S. Dahiya, et al.
Frequent met oncogene amplification in a brca1/trp53 mouse model of mammary tumorigenesis.
Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3452 - 3455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Ge, H. Hu, K. Ding, L. Sun, and S. Zheng
Protein Interaction Analysis of ST14 Domains and Their Point and Deletion Mutants
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7406 - 7412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. S. Kim, C. Heinlein, R. C. Hackman, and P. S. Nelson
Phenotypic Analysis of Mice Lacking the Tmprss2-Encoded Protease
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(3): 965 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Saleem, V. M. Adhami, W. Zhong, B. J. Longley, C.-Y. Lin, R. B. Dickson, S. Reagan-Shaw, D. F. Jarrard, and H. Mukhtar
A novel biomarker for staging human prostate adenocarcinoma: overexpression of matriptase with concomitant loss of its inhibitor, hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 217 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. McCabe, M. Dolled-Filhart, R. L. Camp, and D. L. Rimm
Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQUA) of In Situ Protein Expression, Antibody Concentration, and Prognosis
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 21, 2005; 97(24): 1808 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. F. Siddiqui, J. Pawelek, T. Handerson, C.-Y. Lin, R. B. Dickson, D. L. Rimm, and R. L. Camp
Coexpression of {beta}1,6-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V Glycoprotein Substrates Defines Aggressive Breast Cancers with Poor Outcome
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2517 - 2523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
K. List, R. Szabo, A. Molinolo, V. Sriuranpong, V. Redeye, T. Murdock, B. Burke, B. S. Nielsen, J. S. Gutkind, and T. H. Bugge
Deregulated matriptase causes ras-independent multistage carcinogenesis and promotes ras-mediated malignant transformation
Genes & Dev., August 15, 2005; 19(16): 1934 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B. S. Knudsen, J. M. Lucas, L. Fazli, S. Hawley, S. Falcon, I. M. Coleman, D. B. Martin, C. Xu, L. D. True, M. E. Gleave, et al.
Regulation of Hepatocyte Activator Inhibitor-1 Expression by Androgen and Oncogenic Transformation in the Prostate
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2005; 167(1): 255 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Handerson, R. Camp, M. Harigopal, D. Rimm, and J. Pawelek
{beta}1,6-Branched Oligosaccharides Are Increased in Lymph Node Metastases and Predict Poor Outcome in Breast Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2969 - 2973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M.-S. Lee, K.-i. Kiyomiya, C. Benaud, R. B. Dickson, and C.-Y. Lin
Simultaneous activation and hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor 1-mediated inhibition of matriptase induced at activation foci in human mammary epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): C932 - C941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Khoury, M. A. Naujokas, D. Zuo, V. Sangwan, M. M. Frigault, S. Petkiewicz, D. L. Dankort, W. J. Muller, and M. Park
HGF Converts ErbB2/Neu Epithelial Morphogenesis to Cell Invasion
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 550 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Noel, C Maillard, N Rocks, M Jost, V Chabottaux, N E Sounni, E Maquoi, D Cataldo, and J M Foidart
Membrane associated proteases and their inhibitors in tumour angiogenesis
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2004; 57(6): 577 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R.-J. Hung, I.-W. J. Hsu, J. L. Dreiling, M.-J. Lee, C. A. Williams, M. D. Oberst, R. B. Dickson, and C.-Y. Lin
Assembly of adherens junctions is required for sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced matriptase accumulation and activation at mammary epithelial cell-cell contacts
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): C1159 - C1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
S. Ihara, E. Miyoshi, S. Nakahara, H. Sakiyama, H. Ihara, A. Akinaga, K. Honke, R. B. Dickson, C.-Y. Lin, and N. Taniguchi
Addition of {beta}1-6 GlcNAc branching to the oligosaccharide attached to Asn 772 in the serine protease domain of matriptase plays a pivotal role in its stability and resistance against trypsin
Glycobiology, February 1, 2004; 14(2): 139 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Walter-Yohrling, X. Cao, M. Callahan, W. Weber, S. Morgenbesser, S. L. Madden, C. Wang, and B. A. Teicher
Identification of Genes Expressed in Malignant Cells That Promote Invasion
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8939 - 8947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Davol, R. Bagdasaryan, G. J. Elfenbein, A. L. Maizel, and A. R. Frackelton Jr.
Shc Proteins Are Strong, Independent Prognostic Markers for Both Node-Negative and Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6772 - 6783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Kirchhofer, M. Peek, W. Li, J. Stamos, C. Eigenbrot, S. Kadkhodayan, J. M. Elliott, R. T. Corpuz, R. A. Lazarus, and P. Moran
Tissue Expression, Protease Specificity, and Kunitz Domain Functions of Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator Inhibitor-1B (HAI-1B), a New Splice Variant of HAI-1
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36341 - 36349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. D. Oberst, C. A. Williams, R. B. Dickson, M. D. Johnson, and C.-Y. Lin
The Activation of Matriptase Requires Its Noncatalytic Domains, Serine Protease Domain, and Its Cognate Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26773 - 26779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Camp, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Camp, R. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online