Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micheletti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giavazzi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micheletti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giavazzi, R.
[Cancer Research 63, 1534-1537, April 1, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Vascular-targeting Activity of ZD6126, a Novel Tubulin-binding Agent1

Gianluca Micheletti, Maura Poli, Patrizia Borsotti, Michele Martinelli, Barbara Imberti, Giulia Taraboletti and Raffaella Giavazzi2

Laboratory of Biology and Therapy of Metastasis, Department of Oncology, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, 24125 Bergamo, Italy


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The tubulin-binding agent ZD6126 is a novel vascular-targeting agent in clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. In vivo, ZD6126 is rapidly converted into N-acetylcolchinol (ZD6126 phenol). In this study, we have explored the antivascular property of N-acetylcolchinol in vitro and ZD6126 in vivo. In cell culture, N-acetylcolchinol induced rapid changes in the morphology of human umbilical vein and lung microvessel endothelial cells. Within 40 min, the compound induced endothelial cell contraction, destabilization of the tubulin cytoskeleton, induction of actin stress fibers, and membrane blebbing. These effects occurred at noncytotoxic concentrations and were rapidly reversed on removal of the drug. Nonconfluent endothelial cells were more sensitive than confluent, quiescent cells. Among different cell types, endothelial cells were the most sensitive to the induction of morphological changes, whereas smooth muscle cells were not affected. In vitro, N-acetylcolchinol rapidly disrupted a network of newly formed cords. In vivo, ZD6126 caused shut down of newly formed vessels in the Matrigel plug assay, shortly after injection. This study indicates that rapid alteration of endothelial cell morphology may be responsible for the loss of tumor blood vessel integrity, vessel shut down, and extensive tumor necrosis induced by ZD6126 in experimental tumor models.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The interest in vascular-targeted anticancer therapy arises from the dependence of tumor cells on a functional blood vessel system for survival, proliferation, and metastatic dissemination. Hence, the possibility to indirectly inhibit tumor growth and survival by impairing neovessel formation or function (1, 2, 3) .

Unlike antiangiogenic agents, aimed at preventing vessel formation, the vascular-targeting agents aim to compromise the integrity and functionality of already existing tumor vessels, leading to shutdown of the tumor vascular system and consequent tumor cell death (4) . Vascular targeting is made possible by the structural, phenotypic, and functional differences between vessels in tumor and normal tissues (5, 6, 7) . Endothelial cells in tumors are exposed to a peculiar environment (low oxygen tension, low pH, presence of cytokines, and growth factors) and are undergoing angiogenesis. Hence, they differ from quiescent endothelial cells in terms of functional status and gene expression, including the expression of antigenic determinants. It is possible to exploit these changes for therapeutic purposes in two distinct vascular-targeting approaches by: (a) directing therapeutic agents to endothelial cells within tumors or (b) using agents that selectively affect tumor endothelial cells (i.e., tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, flavone acetic acid and its analogue dimethylxanthenone acetic acid, and tubulin-binding agents; Refs. 4 and 8, 9, 10 ).

Microtubules are an interesting target for vascular-targeting agents. Compounds that affect microtubule dynamics act as antiangiogenic agents, because they affect endothelial cell functions crucial for this process (motility, invasion, attachment, alignment, and proliferation; Refs. 11, 12, 13 ). Microtubule depolymerizating agents, including colchicine, podophyllotoxin, and Vinca alkaloids, cause damage to the existing vasculature of tumors (4) . However, the narrow therapeutic window of these agents (vascular-targeting activity is achieved only at doses approaching or exceeding their maximum tolerated dose) has prevented their development as vascular-targeting agents. Recently, microtubule-destabilizing agents such as combretastatin A-4 (14) have been described, which have activity against tumor vasculature at doses significantly lower than the maximum tolerated dose, and, therefore, these agents have the potential to exploit this effect therapeutically.

The colchicine derivative ZD6126 is a novel water-soluble phosphate pro-drug. It is converted in vivo into N-acetylcolchinol (ZD6126 phenol), which binds to the colchicine-binding site on tubulin, and causes disruption of microtubules. In animal models, ZD6126 selectively induces tumor vascular damage and massive tumor necrosis at well-tolerated doses (15) . ZD6126 is currently in early phase clinical trial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of this vascular-targeting antitumor agent on endothelial cells in vitro and on neo-formed vessels in vivo.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Compounds.
ZD6126 (MW 437) is a water-soluble phosphate pro-drug rapidly converted, in vivo, into the active compound N-acetylcolchinol (MW 357). Both molecules were from AstraZeneca (Alderley Park, Macclesfiled, United Kingdom). For the in vitro experiments, they were dissolved in DMSO (0.1 M stock solution) and freshly diluted in test medium before use.

Cells.
HUVECs,3 isolated and cultured as described (12) , were used between the third and fifth passages. HMVEC-Ls from Clonetics (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) were cultured in Endothelial Basal Medium. NIH-3T3 (murine fibroblasts) and MDA-MB-435 (human breast carcinoma cells) were cultured in DMEM 10% fetal bovine serum. SKOV-3 (human ovarian carcinoma cells) and A-10 (rat smooth muscle cells) were cultured in RPMI 1640 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 2 mM sodium pyruvate.

Analysis of Cell Morphology.
Nontissue culture 96-well plates (Microtest; Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) were coated with 5 µg/ml (625 ng/cm2) fibronectin (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), collagen I (Becton Dickinson), and collagen IV (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in PBS or with gelatin 1% (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland) for 2 h at 37°C. After washing in PBS, nonspecific sites were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS (30 min at 37°C). Cells (2.5 x 104 cells/well, unless indicated) in DMEM 0.1% BSA were added and let adhere for 4 h at 37°C. Adherent cells were then exposed to ZD6126, N-acetylcolchinol, or vehicle for 40 min (three to six wells for each condition). Wells were washed with DMEM 0.1% BSA to remove detached cells, stained with crystal violet (0.5% in 20% methanol), rinsed with water, and air dried. Cells were analyzed by inverted light microscopy (IX70; Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) and computer image analysis (Image Pro-Plus 4.5; Media Cybernetics, LP). The degree of cell spreading was evaluated as the cell area (area of the plate covered by the cells, normalized to the number of adherent cells). To evaluate the number of adhered cells, the stain was eluted with a 1:1 solution of ethanol; 0.1 M sodium citrate and absorbance at 540 nm was read.

Proliferation Assay.
Cells (4 x 103 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates in complete medium. After 24 h, N-acetylcolchinol was added (0.001–100 µM). After 1 h, cells were washed and incubated for an additional 3 days. Alternatively, the cells were incubated with the compound for 72 h. Cells were stained with crystal violet, and absorbance was measured as for the adhesion assay. Data are the percentage of control proliferation and the IC50, the drug concentration that causes 50% inhibition of cell proliferation.

Immunofluorescence Analysis of the Cytoskeleton.
HUVECs were grown on 1% gelatin-coated glass coverslips for 3–5 days, incubated for 40 min with N-acetylcolchinol or vehicle in DMEM 0.1% BSA, and fixed and permeated with cold absolute ethanol for 10 min at -20°C. Fixed cells were washed and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with antibodies against ß-tubulin (T4026; Sigma), 1:200. After washings, cells were incubated with 1:200 FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) together with the F-actin-binding rhodamine-phalloidin (25 IU/ml; Biomolecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands). Coverslips were then washed and mounted with N-propyl gallate in 50% (volume for volume) glycerol and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8). Samples were analyzed at fluorescence microscopy (IX70; Olympus) with U-HNIBA filter for ß-tubulin and U-HWIG2 for F-actin.

Cord Disruption Assay.
HUVECs (2 x 104 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates on a thick layer of Matrigel (Becton Dickinson; 10 mg/ml, 60 µl/well) and let align for 24 h. N-acetylcolchinol or vehicle was added to the formed cords and left for 24 h. Pictures were taken at the indicated times (0.5–24 h) after compound addition.

In Vivo Angiogenesis Assay.
The Matrigel plug assay was used (12) . Briefly, basic FGF (500 ng/pellet) was embedded in Matrigel (12.5 mg/ml, 0.5 ml) and injected s.c. in C57BL/6N mice (Charles River, Calco, Italy). ZD6126 (200 mg/kg, i.p., single injection) or vehicle (PBS + 5% NaCO3) was given to mice 1, 5, or 22 h before necropsy (day 7 after Matrigel injection, n = 6). One h before necropsy, mice were injected i.v. with 100 µl of FITC-conjugated Griffonia Simplicifolia Isolectin-B4 (0.25 mg/ml; Vector, Burlingame, CA). The Matrigel plug was removed and frozen. Perfused, FITC-positive vessels were analyzed with a laser confocal microscope (InSight Plus; Meridian Instruments, Inc., Okemos, MI) with Argon 488 nm emission source.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
N-acetylcolchinol and ZD6126 Affect Endothelial Cell Morphology.
The effects of the pro-drug ZD6126 and the active compound N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell morphology were investigated. In preliminary experiments, we observed that N-acetylcolchinol was >=10 times more potent than the pro-drug ZD6126 (data not shown), suggesting a limited conversion of the pro-drug in our experimental conditions in the absence of serum. The subsequent in vitro experiments were performed only with N-acetylcolchinol.

HUVECs were left to adhere to different extracellular matrix components for 4 h and then exposed for 40 min to N-acetylcolchinol. Treated cells retracted and assumed a rounded morphology, indicated by the reduced cell area (Fig. 1, A and B)Citation . Similar effects were observed when cells were plated on fibronectin, gelatin, type I collagen, and type IV collagen (IC50 ranged from 0.51 to 0.83 µM; Fig. 1Citation ). The change in cell shape was only partially associated with detachment of the cells from the substratum, because N-acetylcolchinol caused only <=20% cell detachment (data not shown). When added to endothelial cells while they were adhering to the substrata, the compound only marginally impaired attachment (data not shown), excluding an effect on cell–substrate recognition/binding.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effects of N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeletal organization. HUVECs adherent to fibronectin (diamonds), type I collagen (triangles), type IV collagen (squares), or gelatin (crosses) were exposed to the indicated concentrations of N-acetylcolchinol for 40 min, washed, and stained with crystal violet. The degree of cell spreading was evaluated as the cell area and expressed as the percentage of control (vehicle). Data are from one experiment representative of two. A and B, representative images of cells, adherent onto fibronectin, after 40-min incubation with vehicle (A) or 1 µM N-acetylcolchinol (B, x100). C–H, analysis of the tubulin and actin cytoskeleton in HUVECs exposed to vehicle (C and D) or to 1 µM N-acetylcolchinol (E–H) for 40 min and stained with antitubulin antibody (C, E, and G) and rhodamine-phalloidin (D, F, and H). The concomitant depolymerization of microtubules (E and G) and induction of actin stress fibers (F and H) are evident in treated cells. Retracted cells, showing a blebbing morphology, are indicated by arrows (E and F) and in the inset in H (x400).

 
Endothelial cell retraction was associated with alterations in the organization of both the tubulin and actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 1C–H)Citation . N-acetylcolchinol (1 µM) caused complete depolymerization of microtubules in 40 min and induced the formation of actin stress fibers across the cell body (Fig. 1)Citation . Many cells retracted and exhibited blebbing of the plasma membrane (Fig. 1)Citation . The effect of N-acetylcolchinol of endothelial cell morphology was more prominent on scattered, nonconfluent cells (in three experiments, mean IC50 was 0.07 ± 0.01 µM), whereas confluent, quiescent cells were less sensitive (IC50 = 0.62 ± 0.2 µM).

Alteration of cell morphology occurred at concentrations of N-acetylcolchinol that did not impair endothelial cell proliferation. When HUVECs were exposed for 1 h to N-acetylcolchinol, inhibition of cell proliferation was observed only at concentrations much higher (100–1000-fold) than those required to alter cell shape (Table 1)Citation . Only at longer exposure times (72 h) was an antiproliferative effect observed (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Effect of N-acetylcolchinol on morphology and proliferation of different cell typesa

 
N-acetylcolchinol also affected the morphology of endothelial cells isolated from microvessels, HMVEC-Ls, causing their retraction at concentrations that did not affect their proliferation (Table 1)Citation . Nonendothelial cells were generally less sensitive to the compound in terms of cell shape changes compared with endothelial cells (Table 1)Citation . N-acetylcolchinol caused marginal changes in the morphology of smooth muscle cells A-10, which were also less sensitive to the antiproliferative activity of the compound (Table 1)Citation . NIH-3T3 fibroblasts showed an intermediate behavior between HUVEC and A10 (Table 1)Citation . The morphology of the two tumor cell lines tested (SKOV-3 and MDA-MB-435) was only partially affected by N-acetylcolchinol (41 and 37% reduction in cell area, respectively), although the compound had an antiproliferative activity comparable with endothelial cells (Table 1)Citation .

The modifications induced by N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell morphology (both HUVECs and HMVEC-Ls) were reversible, and cells reverted to the original shape by 3 h after removal of the compound. Recovery of cell shape was faster (1 h) when cells were treated with low concentrations of the compound (0.1–1 µM), but even after treatment with higher concentrations, no significant permanent modification of the cell shape was apparent (Fig. 2)Citation . Colchicine, a related tubulin-targeting agent, induced similar changes in endothelial cell morphology, although in this case, changes were not reversible (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Reversibility of the effect of N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell shape. After a 40-min incubation with the compound (0.1–100 µM), cells were washed and incubated with fresh medium. Images were taken at 1 and 3 h after drug washout. Cell spreading, evaluated as the cell area, is expressed as the percentage of control. Data are from one experiment representative of two.

 
N-acetylcolchinol and ZD6126 Affect Newly Formed Blood Vessels.
We next evaluated whether the compounds had activity against newly formed vessels, in in vitro and in vivo models. In vitro, HUVECs, seeded on a permissive thick layer of the reconstituted basement membrane Matrigel, rapidly align and form a network of cords, reminiscent of newly formed vessels. The addition of >=1 µM N-acetylcolchinol to formed cords rapidly disrupted the integrity of the network (Fig. 3, A and B)Citation . The effect was reversible because, 24 h later, cells appeared to have re-established the original structures (Fig. 3, C and D)Citation .



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of N-acetylcolchinol and ZD6126 on newly formed vessels. A–D, in vitro, N-acetylcolchinol (1 µM; B and D) or vehicle (A and C) was added to cords formed by endothelial cells on Matrigel, 24 h after HUVEC seeding. Images were taken 1 h (A and B) and 24 h (C and D) after addition of the compound (x40). E–H, in vivo effect of ZD6126 on neo-formed vessels. Confocal microscopy images (x250) showing FITC-isolectin B4 staining of the vasculature within the Matrigel plug in control mice (E) or 1 h (F), 5 h (G), or 22 h (H) after treatment with ZD6126 (200 mg/kg, i.p.).

 
In vivo, we evaluated the effect of ZD6126 on newly formed capillaries induced by basic FGF in a pellet of Matrigel. Seven days after injection, FGF-containing Matrigel in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 3E)Citation presented a strong angiogenic response, with numerous functional, perfused neo-vessels, particularly abundant and presenting a larger caliber at the periphery of the pellet. Treatment of mice with ZD6126 (200 mg/kg i.p.) caused an almost complete shutdown of the vessels, which, 1 h after treatment, were no longer perfused by FITC-isolectin B4 (Fig. 3F)Citation . H&E staining and immunostaining for the endothelial cell-specific antigen CD31 showed that vascular structures were still present in parallel pellets (data not shown). Similar to our observations on in vitro cords, also in this in vivo model, the effect was reversible, and 22 h after treatment, vessels in Matrigel were again perfused (Fig. 3H)Citation . The phenomenon of reperfusion appeared primarily at the periphery of the pellet.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study shows that the vascular-targeting agent ZD6126, through its active metabolite N-acetylcolchinol, affects endothelial cell morphology, destabilizes the tubulin cytoskeleton, and disrupts newly formed vessels.

In vitro, N-acetylcolchinol causes retraction of endothelial cells, disrupting the tubulin cytoskeleton and inducing actin stress fibers and membrane blebbing. Cooperation between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton is crucial in the control of cell shape, adhesion, contraction, and motility (16) . Microtubules directly control actin filament organization by locally modulating the activity of the small GTPases of the Rho family. In particular, microtubule-disrupting agents induce guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1-mediated activation of Rho, which triggers stress fiber formation (17) . Combretastatin A4 causes Rho-mediated endothelial cell retraction, membrane blebbing, and assembly of stress fibers (18) . Therefore, it is possible that morphological changes and cytoskeletal modifications caused by N-acetylcolchinol might involve GEF-H1/Rho activation.

The ability of tubulin-binding agents to cause rapid endothelial cell retraction is thought to underlie their vascular-targeting activity. In vivo, in a tumor setting, endothelial cell retraction may lead to the increased permeability, exposure of the basement membrane, platelet activation, and coagulation. Accordingly, in a panel of tumor models in vivo, ZD6126 induced rapid (30–60 min) changes in central tumor capillaries with focal loss of endothelial cells, exposure of the basal lamina, accumulation of platelets and fibrin, thrombus formation, and congestion of tumor vessels (15) . By 24 h, extensive central necrosis of the tumor, with only a thin viable rim of tumor cells at the periphery, is observed (15 , 19) .

After injection of a single, well-tolerated dose (61 mg/kg) to mice, ZD6126 is rapidly converted to N-acetylcolchinol (peak concentrations at 10 min). Thereafter, the plasma concentration of N-acetylcolchinol declines (half-life of ~1 h), and 1 h after administration, plasma concentrations are ~2 µg/ml (5.6 µM; Ref. 15 ). The plasma profile of N-acetylcolchinol in mice (consistent with the conditions active in vitro on endothelial cell morphology), together with the rapid elimination of the compound from the plasma, may further rule out a significant effect on cell proliferation, which requires higher concentrations and/or longer times of exposure.

N-acetylcolchinol alters more effectively the shape of nonconfluent endothelial cells than confluent, quiescent endothelial cells. This might depend on differences in the stability of the actin cytoskeleton, in the strength of cell–cell interactions or in the expression of tubulin isotypes, tubulin post-translational modifications, or microtubule-associated proteins between confluent and nonconfluent cells. This difference in sensitivity suggests that the compound is more likely to affect immature endothelial cells (such as those in tumor vessels) rather than mature, quiescent cells of vessels in normal tissues. In agreement, preclinical studies showed activity of ZD6126 on tumor vessels without similar effects on vessels in normal tissues (15) .

The effect of N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell morphology is rapid and reversible, because within 1–3 h after removal of the compound, the cells reverted to their original shape. Although several mechanisms might contribute to the reversibility of the compound activity, this behavior is in agreement with the tubulin-binding kinetics of this class of compounds: (a) a rapid binding to tubulin and (b) a very short dissociation half-life (20) . This property represents an improvement compared with other microtubule-destabilizing agents, such as colchicine, whose narrow therapeutic window has been ascribed to the pseudo-irreversible binding to tubulin (4 , 14) .

The reversibility of the effect of ZD6126/N-acetylcolchinol on endothelial cell morphology, in vitro cord disruption, and in vivo vessels occlusion in the Matrigel model suggests a potential therapeutic margin in the use of this compound. However, these findings also suggest that the damage to tumor vascular induced by this compound may not be permanent and that, especially at the periphery of a tumor, vessels may rapidly recover their functionality. This observation parallels the in vivo evidence that single treatment with ZD6126, although causing central tumor necrosis, may induce only a modest tumor growth delay in animal models (15) . Repeated single agent administration or combination with conventional therapies offer promising therapeutic potential for ZD6126. Indeed, recent preclinical studies have confirmed the increased antitumor activity of multiple doses of ZD6126 (15) and of combinations of this compound with chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens (15 , 19) .


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Anderson Ryan (AstraZeneca, Alderly Park, United Kingdom) for helpful discussions and evaluation of this manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported partially by AstraZeneca (Alderly Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom) and grants from the Italian Foundation for Cancer Research and the Italian Association for Cancer Research. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Gavazzeni 11, 24125 Bergamo, Italy. Phone: (39) 035 319888; Fax: (39) 035 319331; E-mail: giavazzi{at}marionegri.it Back

3 The abbreviations used are: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HMVEC-L, human lung microvascular endothelial cell. Back

Received 9/30/02. Accepted 1/31/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Carmeliet P., Jain R. K. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature, 407: 249-257, 2000.[Medline]
  2. Hanahan D., Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell, 86: 353-364, 1996.[Medline]
  3. Benezra R., Rafii S., Lyden D. The Id proteins and angiogenesis. Oncogene, 20: 8334-8341, 2001.[Medline]
  4. Chaplin D. J., Dougherty G. J. Tumour vasculature as a target for cancer therapy. Br. J. Cancer, 80 (Suppl 1): 57-64, 1999.
  5. Brown J. M., Giaccia A. J. The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. Cancer Res., 58: 1408-1416, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ruoslahti E. Targeting tumor vasculature with homing peptides from phage display. Semin. Cancer Biol., 10: 435-442, 2000.[Medline]
  7. St Croix B., Rago C., Velculescu V., Traverso G., Romans K. E., Montgomery E., Lal A., Riggins G. J., Lengauer C., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K. W. Genes expressed in human tumor endothelium. Science, 289: 1197-1202, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Taraboletti G., Margosio B. Antiangiogenic and antivascular therapy for cancer. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol., 1: 378-384, 2001.[Medline]
  9. Halin C., Zardi L., Neri D. Antibody-based targeting of angiogenesis. News Physiol. Sci., 16: 191-194, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kolonin M., Pasqualini R., Arap W. Molecular addresses in blood vessels as targets for therapy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 5: 308-313, 2001.[Medline]
  11. Belotti D., Vergani V., Drudis T., Borsotti P., Pitelli M. R., Viale G., Giavazzi R., Taraboletti G. The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 1843-1849, 1996.[Abstract]
  12. Taraboletti G., Micheletti G., Rieppi M., Poli M., Turatto M., Rossi C., Borsotti P., Roccabianca P., Scanziani E., Nicoletti M. I., Bombardelli E., Morazzoni P., Riva A., Giavazzi R. Antiangiogenic and antitumor activity of IDN 5390, a new taxane derivative. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 1182-1188, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Miller K. D., Sweeney C. J., Sledge G. W., Jr. Redefining the target: chemotherapeutics as antiangiogenics. J. Clin. Oncol., 19: 1195-1206, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Griggs J., Metcalfe J. C., Hesketh R. Targeting tumour vasculature: the development of combretastatin A4. Lancet Oncol., 2: 82-87, 2001.[Medline]
  15. Blakey D. C., Westwood F. R., Walker M., Hughes G. D., Davis P. D., Ashton S. E., Ryan A. J. Antitumor activity of the novel vascular targeting agent ZD6126 in a panel of tumor models. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 1974-1983, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ingber D. E. Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics. J. Appl. Physiol., 89: 1663-1670, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  17. Krendel M., Zenke F. T., Bokoch G. M. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol., 4: 294-301, 2002.[Medline]
  18. Kanthou C., Tozer G. M. The tumor vascular targeting agent combretastatin A-4-phosphate induces reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and early membrane blebbing in human endothelial cells. Blood, 99: 2060-2069, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Siemann D. W., Rojiani A. M. Enhancement of radiation therapy by the novel vascular targeting agent ZD6126. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 53: 164-171, 2002.[Medline]
  20. Kang G. J., Getahun Z., Muzaffar A., Brossi A., Hamel E. N-acetylcolchinol O-methyl ether and thiocolchicine, potent analogs of colchicine modified in the C ring. Evaluation of the mechanistic basis for their enhanced biological properties. J. Biol. Chem., 265: 10255-10259, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. D. Mocanu, K. W. Yip, J. Skliarenko, W. Shi, P. Busson, K.-W. Lo, C. Bastianutto, and F.-F. Liu
Imaging and Modulating Antisense Microdistribution in Solid Human Xenograft Tumor Models
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5935 - 5941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Gamrekelashvili, C. Kruger, R. von Wasielewski, M. Hoffmann, K. M. Huster, D. H. Busch, M. P. Manns, F. Korangy, and T. F. Greten
Necrotic Tumor Cell Death In Vivo Impairs Tumor-Specific Immune Responses
J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1573 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. V. Beerepoot, S. A. Radema, E. O. Witteveen, T. Thomas, C. Wheeler, S. Kempin, and E. E. Voest
Phase I Clinical Evaluation of Weekly Administration of the Novel Vascular-Targeting Agent, ZD6126, in Patients With Solid Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1491 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. V. Skliarenko, S. J. Lunt, M. L. Gordon, A. Vitkin, M. Milosevic, and R. P. Hill
Effects of the Vascular Disrupting Agent ZD6126 on Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Cell Survival in Tumors
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2074 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. K.W. Wong, P. Chiu, S. S.M. Chung, L. M.C. Chow, Y.-Z. Zhao, B. B. Yang, and B. C.B. Ko
Pseudolaric Acid B, a Novel Microtubule-Destabilizing Agent That Circumvents Multidrug Resistance Phenotype and Exhibits Antitumor Activity In vivo
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 6002 - 6011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Taraboletti, G. Micheletti, R. Dossi, P. Borsotti, M. Martinelli, F. Fiordaliso, A. J. Ryan, and R. Giavazzi
Potential Antagonism of Tubulin-Binding Anticancer Agents in Combination Therapies
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2720 - 2726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. R. Wachsberger, R. Burd, N. Marero, C. Daskalakis, A. Ryan, P. McCue, and A. P. Dicker
Effect of the Tumor Vascular-Damaging Agent, ZD6126, on the Radioresponse of U87 Glioblastoma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 835 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Kasibhatla, H. Gourdeau, K. Meerovitch, J. Drewe, S. Reddy, L. Qiu, H. Zhang, F. Bergeron, D. Bouffard, Q. Yang, et al.
Discovery and mechanism of action of a novel series of apoptosis inducers with potential vascular targeting activity
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2004; 3(11): 1365 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
H. Gourdeau, L. Leblond, B. Hamelin, C. Desputeau, K. Dong, I. Kianicka, D. Custeau, C. Boudreau, L. Geerts, S.-X. Cai, et al.
Antivascular and antitumor evaluation of 2-amino-4-(3-bromo-4,5-dimethoxy-phenyl)-3-cyano-4H-chromenes, a novel series of anticancer agents
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2004; 3(11): 1375 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Evelhoch, P. M. LoRusso, Z. He, Z. DelProposto, L. Polin, T. H. Corbett, P. Langmuir, C. Wheeler, A. Stone, J. Leadbetter, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of the Response of Murine and Human Tumors to the Vascular-Targeting Agent ZD6126
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3650 - 3657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A R Padhani
MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S60 - S80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micheletti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giavazzi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micheletti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giavazzi, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online