| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Tumor Biology |
The National Public Health Institute, Turku University School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Medical Microbiology and the MediCity Research Laboratory, Turku University, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland [S-M. M., S. J.]; Turku University Central Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland [M. L., R. R.]; Turku University Central Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland [R. G.]; MRC Human Immunology Unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom [D. J.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the basis of recent studies, cDNA microarray analysis promises to be a powerful tool for future cancer prognostics (6, 7, 8, 9) . Nevertheless, there remains a need to identify functionally relevant markers not only for the purpose of conventional prognostic analyses but also for the design of more specific arrays. To date, the list of such markers includes proteolytic enzymes essential for invasion and metastasis (10, 11, 12, 13) , proteins involved in the growth and branching of tumor blood vessels (14, 15, 16) , and adhesion proteins necessary for intercellular communication and tumor dissemination (17 , 18) .
One of the important adhesion molecules involved in malignant processes is CD44, a widely expressed cell surface glycoprotein family also essential for numerous physiological events (17) . Since the first evidence of a role of CD44 in malignant behavior was reported, expression patterns of CD44 variant forms on primary tumor cells have been correlated with known clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in many malignant diseases. However, in most cases, tumor expression of CD44 or its variants appears to be insufficient alone to determine the prognosis of a particular cancer (19) .
Tumor-associated blood vessels not only nourish the primary tumor but also serve as an important route for metastasis; hence the levels of tumor angiogenic factors have frequently been measured and shown to correlate with cancer prognosis (10) . However, only half of all malignancies are thought to use the blood vasculature as the primary route for tumor spread. The remaining half, which includes HNSCC, metastasize mainly via the lymphatics, a route that is presently not well understood. The reason for this situation has for long been the lack of immunohistochemical markers for the detection of lymphatic vessels. In the last few years, however, several lymphatic endothelial markers have been discovered, and the true role of the lymphatics in tumor metastasis has begun to emerge. Today, of several lymph endothelial molecules, LYVE-1 is considered to be one of the most valuable (20 , 21) . CD44 and LYVE-1 share both structural and functional similarities but show mutually exclusive expression in the vasculature (20 , 22) . It was recently proposed that the common capacity of CD44 and LYVE-1 to bind hyaluronan may facilitate entry of CD44+ lymphocytes or tumor cells from tissues into the afferent lymphatics and their subsequent trafficking to the regional lymph nodes (23) .
Many blood vessel endothelial molecules play a role in cancer spread. VAP-1 is a heavily sialylated type II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on blood vessel endothelium (24) . It has two distinct functions: it mediates lymphocyte binding to activated endothelium at sites of inflammation and serves as a semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (25) that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of primary biogenic amines, thereby producing highly active end-products such as H2O2 and aldehydes. To date, our knowledge of the role of VAP-1 in cancer is limited, but it has been shown to bind immune-effector cells to tumor endothelium (26 , 27) and may therefore be involved in mediating immune response against the malignant tissue.
In this study, we measured the density and location of tumor lymphatic and blood vessels in HNSCC, using LYVE-1 and VAP-1 as markers, respectively, and examined their relationship with well-defined clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in patients treated by surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Additionally, we determined the levels of tumor cell CD44 and CD44v6 expression to assess their utility as prognostic indicators and to test their statistical association with LYVE-1+ lymph vessel density in light of their proposed role in tumor metastasis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Immunohistochemical Techniques.
A standard immunoperoxidase staining procedure was carried out to detect tissue expression of the studied molecules. Briefly, 5-µm paraffin-embedded serial sections of the primary tumor samples were stained with the Vectastain Elite ABC kits; the method is based on amplification of the biotin-streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase reaction (mouse or rabbit; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA. Nonspecific binding was blocked with normal goat serum (for rabbit antihuman LYVE-1) or with normal horse serum (for all of the mAbs produced in mice or rat). 3,3-Diaminobenzidine in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.03% H2O2 was used as the substrate for the peroxidase-mediated reaction, and the sections were counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin. After staining, the sections were dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and permanently mounted in DePex (BDH Limited, Poole, United Kingdom).
The surface staining of tumor cells (CD44 and CD44v6) was verified semiquantitatively with light microscopy by two independent observers (S-M. M. and R. R.). The surface expression of CD44 and CD44v6 was graded into one of four categories: - (completely negative), +, ++, or +++ (strongly positive). In addition, borderline cases (-/+ and ++/+++) were jointly reviewed, and a consensus was sought. The number of TILs was visually evaluated and scored as either virtually absent or clearly abundant at the tumor margin and inside the tumor cell islets (two categories). The vascularity (CD31+ vessels, VAP-1+ vessels, and LYVE-1+ vessels) was assessed by counting cross-sections of the stained vessels with a standardized method using a 0.25-mm2 microscopic ocular grid. Nine representative fields were analyzed, both within and at the immediate vicinity of the tumor cell islets. The vessel density was then calculated as vessel diameters observed/mm2. Vessels were also scored by location as IT or PT.
Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay.
The enzyme immunoassay has been described in detail previously (29)
. In brief, 96-well enzyme immunoassay plates (White Cliniplate EB; Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) were coated with the biotinylated Hermes-3 mAb. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% dried nonfat milk powder and 1% gelatin diluted in PBS. Appropriately diluted serum samples were applied to the wells and incubated for 60 min. The detecting mAbs, 20E6 or 1F1, were then added and incubated for 60 min. Peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal rat antimouse and mouse antirat IgG (Zymed Laboratories, Inc;, San Francisco, CA) were used as secondary antibodies. The reaction was developed with BM Chemiluminescence ELISA reagents (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and the soluble CD44 molecules were quantified with a luminometer (Luminoscan; Labsystems). CD44-depleted serum was used as the negative control, whereas serum with high levels of soluble CD44 and tonsil lysates with known concentrations of CD44 were used as positive controls.
Statistical Analyses.
Statistical analyses were performed with the SAS 8.0 computer program for personal computers (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). To test associations between different biological variables and between the biological markers and clinicopathological parameters, we used the
2 test for trends or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables, and Pearsons correlation coefficient test for continuous data. Cumulative survival between the groups for each variable studied was compared with the log-rank test. The relative importance of different variables was analyzed by the Coxs proportional hazards model.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Localization of LYVE-1+ Vessels in Tumors Is Critical.
In view of reports that IT lymphatics may in some cases be nonfunctional, we examined the precise location of LYVE-1+ lymphatic vessels in HNSCC in more detail. Specifically, we encoded the tumors by their LYVE-1+ vessel localizations into two groups, IT and PT. IT LYVE-1+ vessels are defined as those within the tumor cell islets and PT LYVE-1+ lymphatic structures as those strictly located outside of the carcinoma tissue at the tumor margin. IT LYVE-1+ vessels were observed in 13% (n = 9) of the samples studied. The presence of IT LYVE-1+ lymphatics was strongly associated with disease-specific death: 41% of the patients who died of their HNSCC had LYVE-1+ IT lymphatics compared with 6% of those who died of other reasons or were alive (P = 0.005) at the end of the follow-up period. PT LYVE-1+ vessels were associated with all traditional clinical parameters that predict more favorable prognosis. PT vessels positive for LYVE-1 were found predominantly in tumors with low clinical stage (stages I and II; P = 0.008). Similarly, both components of the clinical staging, i.e., the tumor size and the cervical lymph node status, were independently associated with the localization of LYVE-1+ vessels (P = 0.04 and 0.0006, respectively), so that IT vessels were found in large tumors and in tumors that had already spread to the regional lymph nodes. Examples of vascular stainings are shown in Fig. 1
.
|
Strong Tumor Cell CD44 Expression Is Associated with Decreased Response to Radiation Therapy in HNSCC.
All SCCs expressed CD44 family members either moderately or strongly [n = 37 (38%) and n = 56 (58%), respectively], and only 4 tumors (4%) were weakly positive for CD44. In the case of CD44 variants containing the v6 exon, 22% (n = 19) of the tumors were negative or only very faintly positive. Moderate expression was the most common level found [n = 43 (44%)], and 34% (n = 33) of the tumors had strong expression. Serum levels of soluble CD44 measured at diagnosis were available for 38 patients. The median serum concentration of soluble CD44 was 30.6 ng/l (range, 1.6603.8 ng/l). The most interesting finding concerning the role of CD44 in HNSCC tumor biology was that malignancies with strong CD44 expression at the time of diagnosis still contained active live cancer cells at surgery that was performed after an intense course of radiation therapy [n = 22 (67%); P = 0.03]. We found a weak trend toward a correlation between the primary tumor CD44 expression and soluble CD44 concentrations (P = 0.07, Pearsons correlation test) but found no other statistical associations between serum CD44 and clinicopathological parameters or any of the histological markers. Primary tumor CD44v6 expression was associated with CD44 expression (P = 0.0025) but with no other parameters (P > 0.1 for all of the comparisons). See Fig. 2
for examples of the CD44 staining intensities.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There has been considerable debate about the functional significance of IT lymphatics. Many investigators have suggested that tumors do not possess a lymphatic supply. In addition, in cases where IT lymphatics have been detected, these have been reported to be nonfunctional, based on the results of dye uptake measurements (33) . Although we cannot comment on the capacity of lymph vessels in HNSCC to take up fluorescent dyes, the strong implication is that they are involved in nodal metastasis. Beasley et al. (32) have published results similar to ours in HNSCC. Nevertheless, in the study by Padera et al. (33) , metastases were discovered despite of no detectable IT LYVE-1+ vessels. They proposed that functional lymphatics available at the tumor margin are sufficient for promoting metastasis by offering a larger area for tumor cell escape. In contrast, in our more clinically oriented study on HNSCC, we found that PT lymphatics offer a markedly better survival capacity for the patient. Moreover, we discovered that the presence of LYVE-1+ lymphatic vessels in the PT region was more favorable for the patient than a total absence of LYVE-1+ lymphatic vessels. A question therefore arises concerning the role of PT lymphatics in the pathology of HNSCC. One possibility is that they facilitate recruitment of antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells, which then cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in draining lymph nodes. Such a scenario would explain the correlation between PT lymph vessel density and positive prognosis. Schoppmann et al. (34) recently showed that tissue macrophages support the growth of a lymphatic network in the PT region by expressing lymphatic growth factors. They propose that the rationale behind this would be enhanced antigen presentation by blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells.
The second aim of the study was to investigate the role of tumor cell CD44 in the behavior of HNSCC. Changes in CD44 expression have been successfully correlated with the prognosis in several tumor types. It has become quite clear that CD44 has very different roles in the behavior of different tumors (19) . Here we report for the first time in clinical material that high CD44 expression is evidently associated with the mechanisms malignant cells use to survive the radiation effect. This may further contribute to the higher risk for relapse and thus to poor prognosis. Recently, Yasuda et al. (35) published an experimental report on their finding that apoptosis is reduced in lung cancer cells after CD44 stimulation by down-regulation of Fas. They proposed that hyaluronan in the extracellular matrix would be responsible for the stimulation of CD44. On the basis of our results, the same mechanism may be involved in HNSCC as well. Furthermore, CD44 has been reported to be a docking molecule in HNSCC (36) , and this may explain the higher recurrence rate seen in tumors with strong CD44 expression in our study. CD44 has an acknowledged role not only in anchoring tumor cells but also in tumor dissemination, and these processes involve differential regulatory mechanisms. Locally, CD44 may dock tumor cells to the surrounding tissue structures and thus support cancer growth at the primary location. In contrast, CD44-mediated invasion and consequent metastasis formation is, at least, partially attributable to the biological association of CD44 with the proteolytic form of matrix metalloproteinase 9 on the tumor cell surface (37) . How the balance between local growth support and tumor cell detachment is controlled, however, remains unclear.
In conclusion, IT localization of LYVE-1+ lymphatic vessels is a novel indicator of poor prognosis in HNSCC, whereas PT LYVE-1+ lymphatics indicate a positive prognosis. Moreover, tumors that strongly express CD44 are more resistant to radiation therapy and have higher incidence of local recurrences. These results suggest that both LYVE-1 and CD44 may be useful prognostic markers in HNSCC.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by The Finnish Cancer Organization, The Finnish Cultural Foundation, The Finnish Academy, The Sigrid Juselius Foundation, The Science and Research Foundation of Farmos, and EVO funding of Turku University Central Hospital. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at MediCity Research Laboratories, Tykistökatu 6 A, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. Phone: 358-2-333-7001; Fax: 358-2-333-7000; E-mail: sanmaula{at}utu.fi ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; LYVE-1, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1; VAP-1, vascular adhesion protein 1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; IT, intratumoral; PT, peritumoral. ![]()
Received 12/13/02. Accepted 2/19/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Holmqvist, J. Gao, G. Adell, J. Carstensen, and X.-F. Sun The location of lymphangiogenesis is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancers with or without preoperative radiotherapy Ann. Onc., November 4, 2009; (2009) mdp486v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Donnem, S. Al-Saad, K. Al-Shibli, L.-T. Busund, and R. M. Bremnes Co-expression of PDGF-B and VEGFR-3 strongly correlates with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in non-small-cell lung cancer Ann. Onc., July 23, 2009; (2009) mdp296v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. FRECH, K. HORMANN, F. RIEDEL, and K. GOTTE Lymphatic Vessel Density in Correlation to Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1675 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lahat, A. Lazar, X. Wang, W.-L. Wang, Q.-S. Zhu, K. K. Hunt, R. E. Pollock, and D. Lev Increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression Is Insufficient to Induce Lymphatic Metastasis in Human Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 15(8): 2637 - 2646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Saad, J. L. Lindner, Y. Liu, and J. F. Silverman Lymphangiogenesis in Esophageal Adenocarcinomas--Lymphatic Vessel Density as Prognostic Marker in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Am J Clin Pathol, January 1, 2009; 131(1): 92 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Clasper, D. Royston, D. Baban, Y. Cao, S. Ewers, S. Butz, D. Vestweber, and D. G. Jackson A Novel Gene Expression Profile in Lymphatics Associated with Tumor Growth and Nodal Metastasis Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7293 - 7303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. O'Donnell, M. Feldman, R. Mick, and R. J. Muschel Immunohistochemical Method Identifies Lymphovascular Invasion in a Majority of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Discriminates Between Blood and Lymphatic Vessel Invasion J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2008; 56(9): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bock, L. L. Sinclair, N. S. Bedford, R. E. Jackson, J. H. Lee, and D. K. Trask Modulation of Cellular Invasion by VEGF-C Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2008; 134(4): 355 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B S M S Siriwardena, Y Kudo, I Ogawa, M N G P K Udagama, W M Tilakaratne, and T Takata VEGF-C is associated with lymphatic status and invasion in oral cancer J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 61(1): 103 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Koyama, N. Kobayashi, M. Harada, M. Takeoka, Y. Kawai, K. Sano, M. Fujimori, J. Amano, T. Ohhashi, R. Kannagi, et al. Significance of Tumor-Associated Stroma in Promotion of Intratumoral Lymphangiogenesis: Pivotal Role of a Hyaluronan-Rich Tumor Microenvironment Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 172(1): 179 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Sundar and T. S. Ganesan Role of Lymphangiogenesis in Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4298 - 4307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A B Soares, L Ponchio, P B Juliano, V C de Araujo, and A Altemani Lymphatic vascular density and lymphangiogenesis during tumour progression of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 60(9): 995 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Franzmann, E. P. Reategui, F. Pedroso, F. G. Pernas, B. M. Karakullukcu, K. L. Carraway, K. Hamilton, R. Singal, and W. J. Goodwin Soluble CD44 Is a Potential Marker for the Early Detection of Head and Neck Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1348 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Langley and I. J. Fidler Tumor Cell-Organ Microenvironment Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Cancer Metastasis Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2007; 28(3): 297 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Harrell, B. M. Iritani, and A. Ruddell Tumor-Induced Sentinel Lymph Node Lymphangiogenesis and Increased Lymph Flow Precede Melanoma Metastasis Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2007; 170(2): 774 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Azzali Tumor Cell Transendothelial Passage in the Absorbing Lymphatic Vessel of Transgenic Adenocarcinoma Mouse Prostate Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 334 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-N. Qian, B. Berghuis, G. Tsarfaty, M. Bruch, E. J. Kort, J. Ditlev, I. Tsarfaty, E. Hudson, D. G. Jackson, D. Petillo, et al. Preparing the "Soil": The Primary Tumor Induces Vasculature Reorganization in the Sentinel Lymph Node before the Arrival of Metastatic Cancer Cells Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10365 - 10376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zeng, K. Opeskin, J. Goad, and E. D. Williams Tumor-Induced Activation of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells via Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Is Critical for Prostate Cancer Lymphatic Metastasis Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9566 - 9575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Fiedler, S. Christian, S. Koidl, D. Kerjaschki, M. S. Emmett, D. O. Bates, G. Christofori, and H. G. Augustin The Sialomucin CD34 Is a Marker of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells in Human Tumors Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 168(3): 1045 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M-A Brundler, J A Harrison, B de Saussure, M de Perrot, and M S Pepper Lymphatic vessel density in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to adenocarcinoma J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 59(2): 191 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Gombos, X. Xu, C. S. Chu, P. J. Zhang, and G. Acs Peritumoral Lymphatic Vessel Density and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Expression in Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8364 - 8371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Schacht, S. S. Dadras, L. A. Johnson, D. G. Jackson, Y.-K. Hong, and M. Detmar Up-Regulation of the Lymphatic Marker Podoplanin, a Mucin-Type Transmembrane Glycoprotein, in Human Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Germ Cell Tumors Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2005; 166(3): 913 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tammela, B. Enholm, K. Alitalo, and K. Paavonen The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2005; 65(3): 550 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bono, V.-M. Wasenius, P. Heikkila, J. Lundin, D. G. Jackson, and H. Joensuu High LYVE-1-Positive Lymphatic Vessel Numbers Are Associated with Poor Outcome in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 10(21): 7144 - 7149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rubbia-Brandt, B. Terris, E. Giostra, B. Dousset, P. Morel, and M. S. Pepper Lymphatic Vessel Density and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression Correlate with Malignant Behavior in Human Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6919 - 6928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sipos, W. Klapper, M.-L. Kruse, H. Kalthoff, D. Kerjaschki, and G. Kloppel Expression of Lymphangiogenic Factors and Evidence of Intratumoral Lymphangiogenesis in Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2004; 165(4): 1187 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M Vleugel, R Bos, P van der Groep, A E Greijer, A Shvarts, H V Stel, E van der Wall, and P J van Diest Lack of lymphangiogenesis during breast carcinogenesis J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Padera, Y. Boucher, R. K. Jain, L. M. Wein, P. E. Holden, and D. H. Kirn Correspondence re: S. Maula et al., Intratumoral Lymphatics Are Essential for the Metastatic Spread and Prognosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Cancer Res., 63: 1920-1926, 2003. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8555 - 8557. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Maula, S. Jalkanen, R. Ristamaki, D. Jackson, R. Grenman, and M. Luukkaa Reply Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8558 - 8558. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Irjala, K. Alanen, R. Grenman, P. Heikkila, H. Joensuu, and S. Jalkanen Mannose Receptor (MR) and Common Lymphatic Endothelial and Vascular Endothelial Receptor (CLEVER)-1 Direct the Binding of Cancer Cells to the Lymph Vessel Endothelium Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 63(15): 4671 - 4676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |