Cancer Research Prevention Award  Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidransky, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidransky, D.
[Cancer Research 63, 2316-2321, May 1, 2003]
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Methylation of the Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor Gene in Epithelial Thyroid Tumors

A Marker of Malignancy and a Cause of Gene Silencing1

Mingzhao Xing, Henning Usadel2,,3, Yoram Cohen2, Yutaka Tokumaru, Zhongmin Guo, William B. Westra, Betty C. Tong, Giovanni Tallini, Robert Udelsman, Joseph A. Califano, Paul W. Ladenson and David Sidransky4

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism [M. X., P. W. L.], Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [H. U., Y. C., Y. T., Z. G., B. C. T., J. A. C., D. S.], and Department of Pathology [W. B. W.], the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; Departments of Pathology and Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 [G. T., R. U.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) expression is frequently silenced in epithelial thyroid cancers associated with decreased or absent TSH-promoted iodine uptake. To study the underlying molecular mechanism of decreased TSHR expression, we examined the methylation status of the TSHR gene promoter by sequencing bisulfite-treated DNA from thyroid tumors. After identification of methylated sites by sequencing bisulfite-treated DNA, we used methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and found frequent CpG methylation in papillary thyroid cancer (23 of 39 patients; 59%) and follicular thyroid cancers (7 of 15 patients; 47%). In contrast, we saw no methylation in normal thyroid tissues and benign adenomas (0 of 8 patients; 0%). In human thyroid tumor cell lines, we observed that TSHR was normally expressed at the protein and mRNA level in cells where the TSHR gene was unmethylated, whereas it was silenced in cell lines where the TSHR promoter was hypermethylated. Treatment of the latter cells with a demethylating agent partially restored TSHR expression. We thus demonstrate aberrant methylation of human TSHR as a likely molecular pathway responsible for the silencing of this gene in thyroid cancers. We propose that methylation of TSHR may provide a novel diagnostic marker of malignancy and a basis for potential use of demethylating agents in conjunction with TSH-promoted radioiodine therapy for epithelial thyroid cancers.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
TSHR5 plays a fundamental role in the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth (1 , 2) . It stimulates several key steps in thyrocyte concentration of iodine, including its uptake by NIS and oxidation before incorporation into thyroglobulin by thyroid peroxidase. As has long been recognized, normal iodine uptake and metabolism by thyrocytes critically depends on TSH stimulation via TSHR. This is well illustrated by the decrease or lack of iodine uptake and functional insufficiency of the thyroid gland in central hypothyroidism, a condition caused by insufficient pituitary release or reduced bioactivity of TSH. Similar manifestations are seen with congenital hypothyroidism caused by inactivating mutations of the TSHR gene (3) . These unique functions of TSHR and thyrocytes constitute the basis for the widely used diagnostic and therapeutic application of radioactive iodine for epithelial thyroid cancers. Such radioiodine procedures have traditionally been administered after thyroid hormone withdrawal to increase the TSH level and enhance radioiodine uptake in thyroid cancer cells. Recombinant human TSH has recently also been used for this purpose (4 , 5) .

A major clinical obstacle frequently encountered in the use of radioiodine in thyroid cancer patients, however, is the loss of the iodine-concentrating ability of thyroid tumors (6 , 7) . Although the detailed molecular mechanism underlying this phenomenon is unclear and could occur at various regulatory levels, loss of the TSHR gene expression seems to play an important role. This has been suggested by the numerous RT-PCR and in situ hybridization studies in recent years, which have shown decreased, or even absent, TSHR expression in various types of epithelial thyroid cancers (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) . Although activating mutations in TSHR have been identified frequently in toxic thyroid adenomas (14 , 15) and rarely in thyroid cancers (16, 17, 18) , no inactivating mutations have been found in the TSHR gene in thyroid tumors. Thus, alternative mechanisms underlie the loss of TSHR gene expression in thyroid cancers.

Epigenetic modification through DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides in the 5'-flanking areas of genes is a common pathway used by cells to silence genes (19) . This alteration is an important physiological mechanism in the regulation of gene expression in normal cells, particularly during embryogenesis, and may also occur in pathological conditions, particularly in malignancies, leading to inappropriate silencing of genes (20) . Such aberrant DNA methylation often occurs specifically within somatic genes in certain tumors and can therefore be used as a DNA tumor marker (21 , 22) . Because the 5'-flanking area of the TSHR gene is relatively rich in CpG dinucleotides, we hypothesized that aberrant DNA methylation represents a molecular pathway underlying TSHR gene silencing in thyroid tumors. In the present study, we indeed found frequent aberrant DNA methylation in the promoter regions of the TSHR gene in all types of epithelial thyroid cancers, but not in benign thyroid adenomas. A correlation between DNA methylation and TSHR gene silencing was also demonstrated.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Human Thyroid Tissues and Cell Lines.
Human thyroid tissues were obtained from fresh surgical samples or paraffin-embedded blocks from the tissue bank of the Department of Pathology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (approved by the Joint Committee on Clinical Investigation). The human thyroid tumor cell lines were kindly provided by the following authors: the benign thyroid hyperplasia or adenoma cell lines KAK-1 and KAT-7 and the papillary cancer cell lines KAT-5 and KAT-10 were from Dr. K. B. Ain (University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY); the follicular cancer cell line WRO-82-1 and the anaplastic cancer cell line ARO-81-1 were from Dr. G. J. F. Juillard (University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA); and the anaplastic cancer cell line C643 was from Dr. N. E. Heldin (University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden). All of the cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% calf serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, and penicillin-streptomycin in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cells were routinely split every 3–4 days with trypsin-EDTA and harvested at 80% confluency for subsequent experiments. In some experiments, cells were treated with AdC for 0–76 h at various concentrations. In these treatments, cell medium was replaced every 24 h with fresh medium containing AdC at the final concentrations.

Microdissection of Thyroid Tissues and DNA Isolation.
The fresh-frozen tumor samples were microdissected as described previously (23) . Each sample was examined, confirmed for diagnosis, and marked for the lesion of interest by a pathologist (W. B. W.) before careful manual dissection under a microscope. The paraffin-embedded samples were similarly microdissected, but were additionally subjected to treatment with xylene for 3 h at 48°C to remove the paraffin (24) . Thereafter, all of the samples were subjected to digestion with 1% SDS and 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K at 48°C for 48 h, with a midinterval addition of a spiking dose of concentrated SDS-proteinase K. DNA was subsequently isolated from the digested tissues by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation as described previously (25) . Digestion of cells with SDS-proteinase K, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, similarly isolated cell line DNA.

Bisulfite Treatment of DNA.
DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite to convert cytosine to uracil, as described recently, with a slight modification (24) . Briefly, ~2 µg of DNA in 20 µl of H2O containing 5 µg of salmon sperm DNA were denatured by incubation with 0.3 M NaOH at 50°C for 20 min. The DNA was then incubated at 70°C for 3 h in a 500-µl reaction mixture containing 2.5 M sodium metabisulfite and 0.125 M hydroquinone (pH 5.0). The treated DNA was purified with the Wizard DNA purification system, according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and finally resuspended in 20 µl of H2O after ethanol precipitation and vacuum drying.

Amplification and Sequencing of Bisulfite-treated DNA.
A 483-bp fragment flanking the 5'-end area of TSHR gene (-209 to +274; numbered from the most 5' transcription initiation site as defined originally; Ref. 26 ) was amplified from bisulfite-treated DNA isolated from fresh-frozen surgical tumor tissues, using the following primers: 5'-AACTCTAAAATCCTCCTCCTAATAACAC-3' (antisense) and 5'-GGTTTTGGAGAGAATTAATGGGAG-3' (sense). This fragment represents a region rich in CpG sites that extends downstream through nucleotide number +274 in the first exon (in which the translation site is located) from nucleotide number -209 upstream of the transcription site. The primers were designed from regions in which there are no CpG dinucleotides so that there should be no DNA methylation; consequently, all of the cytosines in these regions are converted to uracil after bisulfite treatment. This helps assure the high specificity of the above primers, which are based on the presumption that all of the cytosines were converted.

The amplification PCR was performed with deoxynucleotides with a step-down protocol: 1 cycle of 94°C for 5 min; 2 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 62°C for 45 s, and 70°C for 1 min; 2 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 59°C for 45 s, and 70°C for 1 min; 2 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 56°C for 45 s, and 70°C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 54°C for 45 s, and 70°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 70°C for 5 min. The PCR products were gel-purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit-250 according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Qiagen, Inc). Each amplified DNA sample was subjected to DNA sequencing with the sense and antisense primers described above. The sequence analysis by PCR was performed as described previously (27) , with use of the Thermosequenase kit (Perkin-Elmer) and the following conditions: 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 52°C for 1 min, and 70°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 70°C for 5 min. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on a Genomyx apparatus. For each sample, the DNA sequence was read from both the sense and the antisense ends. A cytosine nucleotide in a CpG dinucleotide that remained unconverted after bisulfite treatment was considered to be methylated.

MSP.
MSP was performed according to the previously described principles (28) . The MSP primers were designed based on certain regions in the 5'-flanking area of the TSHR gene where some CpG dinucleotides are consistently methylated, as revealed by the above-described sequencing experiments. Such CpG dinucleotides corresponded to the 3' ends of the designed primers used in the MSP, as conventionally required, to enhance the specificity of MSP. More details are reported in the "Results." All of the primers were synthesized by Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA) and were as follows: 5'-CACCAACTACAACAAATCCACCA-3' (antisense; 23 bp; Tm, 60.03°C) and 5'-TGTAGAGTTGAGAATGAGGTGATTTT-3' (sense; 26 bp; T, 58.86°C) for unmethylation PCR; 5'-CAACTACAACAAATCCGCCG-3' (antisense; 20 bp; Tm, 59.12°C) and 5'-TGTAGAGTTGAGAATGAGGTGATTTC-3' (sense; 26 bp; Tm, 59.08°C) for methylation PCR. The unmethylated DNA primers and methylated primers flanked DNA fragments of 91 and 88 bp, respectively, involving a region in the gene that extends 61 nucleotides upstream and 30 nucleotides downstream of the translation site.

The PCR reaction conditions were as described previously (29) with slight modifications: 3% DMSO, 16.6 mM ammonium sulfate, 67 mM Tris (pH 8.8), 6.7 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1.25 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 225 ng of each primer (sense and antisense), 1 µl of bisulfite-treated DNA template, and 0.5 unit of platinum DNA Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.) in a 25-µl reaction mixture. PCR was run with step-down cycles: 1 cycle of 95°C for 5 min; 3 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 67°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; 3 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 65°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 63°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

The final PCR products were resolved on a 10% acrylamide gel and visualized by staining with CYBR Gold (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). In some experiments, real-time quantitative MSP as described previously (24) was also performed on needle-biopsy tissues from primary tumors, using the following primers: 5'-GGTGTAGAGTTGAGAATGAGGTGATTTC-3' (sense), 5'-GCCCAAATCCCTAAACAAATCG-3' (antisense), and 6-carboxyfluorescein-5'-TCGGCGGATTTGTTGTAGTTGGTGTTGT-3'-6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (internal probe). The PCR was performed on a PE Applied Biosystems 7700 Sequence Detector, and the data were processed and analyzed as described previously (24) . To determine the specificity and sensitivity of the real-time quantitative MSP, the methylation status (negative versus positive) of the primary tumors was first confirmed by standard MSP.

Cell Protein Preparation, SDS-PAGE, and Western Blotting.
Cells cultured in 75-ml flasks were washed three times with ice-cold serum-free culture medium supplemented with protease inhibitors: 1 mM diisopropyl fluorophosphate (Sigma) and 0.4% of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Calbiochem). Cells were then scraped and lysed in ice-cold water similarly supplemented with protease inhibitors and sonicated briefly to break the cells and DNA; protein concentrations were then measured.

The samples were adjusted to equalize the protein concentrations, combined with one volume of 2x concentrated SDS-loading buffer, and resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 4–20% gradient acrylamide gel. The proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, blocked overnight at 4°C with 5% dry milk in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20, and subsequently incubated at room temperature for 2 h with a mouse monoclonal antihuman TSHR IgG1 antibody (Affinity Bioreagents, Inc., Golden, CO) then for 1.5 h with peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Three 5-min washings followed each antibody incubation. The membrane-bound protein was finally detected with an ECL kit (Amersham) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mouse antibody recognizes 63- and 50-kDa bands, which represent glycosylated and nonglycosylated TSHR subunits, respectively (30) .

Detection of TSHR mRNA by RT-PCR.
Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Life Technologies). The RNA was measured and adjusted to the same level for each cell line, and then treated with DNase I to eliminate genomic DNA before cDNA synthesis. cDNA synthesis was conducted using random hexamers with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). The final cDNA products were used as the templates for subsequent PCR with primers designed specifically for TSHR cDNA: 5'-CACATCAAGGACTCAAGGATTCCT-3' (antisense) and 5'-AGTGGACCAAGCTTGCTGGA-3' (sense). These primers flank a 227-bp fragment in the TSHR cDNA that includes exons 8, 9, and 10. The PCR conditions were the same as those for MSP, with the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle of 95°C for 5 min; 3 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 67°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; 3 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 65°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 65°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were resolved by acrylamide gel and visualized with CYBR Gold as described above.

Arachidonic Acid Release Assay.
Cellular arachidonic acid release was assayed as described previously with minor modifications (31) . Briefly, cells cultured in a 24-well plate were incubated overnight with 1 µCi/well [3H]AA (specific activity, 209 Ci/mmol; Amersham) at 37°C and 5% CO2. In the last 6–8 h of labeling, the culture medium was replaced with serum-free medium containing the same concentration of [3H]AA. At the end of labeling, each well was washed three times with 1 ml of serum-free culture medium supplemented with 2 mg/ml bovine albumin and prewarmed at 37°C, and equilibrated for 20 min. The medium was then replaced with 0.5 ml of prewarmed serum-free medium containing the indicated stimulation agents. After a 20-min incubation at 37°C with frequent gentle shaking, the 0.5 ml of reaction medium containing the released [3H]AA was transferred to 0.5 ml of ice-cold PBS containing 10 mM EDTA and 10 mM EGTA and subjected to microcentrifugation at 4°C. The supernatant was counted by beta scintillation spectrophotometry to measure released [3H]AA. The cells that remained in the plate were freed by trypsinization and counted for radioactivity as cell-associated [3H]AA. The released [3H]AA is reported as the percentage of total radioactivity (released [3H]AA plus cell-associated [3H]AA).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Designing of MSP Primers and Validation of MSP.
To identify the presence of CpG methylation in the TSHR gene, we sequenced the promoter region, using bisulfate-treated DNA isolated from six thyroid cancers and four benign adenomas. After bisulfite treatment, we found that some of the CpG cytosine nucleotides were not converted to uridine nucleotides in thyroid cancers (i.e., protected from cytosine methylation). In contrast, cytosine methylation was not seen in the benign adenomas analyzed. Fig. 1ACitation represents an example showing only partial conversion of the cytosines in two CpG dinucleotides to thymidines in PTCs but complete conversion of these cytosines to thymidines in adenomas. We then designed specific methylated and unmethylated sequence primers based on these findings and performed MSP. The MSP analysis demonstrated a specific unmethylated or methylated band for each sample and revealed a methylation pattern identical to that revealed by the DNA sequence analysis, i.e., methylation was seen only in PTCs but not in adenomas (Fig. 1B)Citation . The TSHR gene in the PTC-derived KAT-5 cell line also showed heavy promoter methylation. As expected, MSP using these specific primers only amplified a signal from bisulfate-treated DNA but not from native DNA lacking conversion of cytosine to uracil (Fig. 1B)Citation . These data established the validity of the MSP as a convenient and specific method to study TSHR gene methylation status.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Sequencing of bisulfite-treated DNA and validation of MSP. A, the 5' region of the human TSHR gene, where cytosine was only partially converted to uracil (amplified as thymidine) in two CpG dinucleotides (arrows) in PTCs, but completely converted to uracil in the adenomas. The failure of the cytosines to be converted in the CpG dinucleotides is attributable to protection by methylation. The antisense primers for MSP were designed from this region as described in "Materials and Methods." B, results of MSP with the same tumor DNA samples from A, showing methylation patterns identical to those seen in A. The methylation status of the TSHR gene in human KAT-5 cell line is also shown. Note that the bisulfite-treated DNA, but not the native DNA, produced a product by MSP. U, unmethylated; M, methylated.

 
TSHR Gene Methylation in Various Thyroid Tumors.
Using MSP, we next studied the methylation status of the TSHR gene in an expanded pool of thyroid tumor samples. Fig. 2ACitation shows a representative analysis of each type of thyroid tumor. As summarized in Table 1Citation , we observed no methylation among the eight benign thyroid adenomas. In contrast, 7 of 15 FTCs (47%) and 23 of 39 PTCs (59%) showed TSHR gene methylation. Only 2 of 11 (18%) ATCs showed TSHR gene methylation. Like KAT-5 cells (Fig. 1B)Citation , various other types of thyroid tumor cell lines also showed TSHR gene methylation (Fig. 2B)Citation .



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Methylation status of TSHR in various thyroid tumors (A) and thyroid tumor cell lines (B). U, unmethylated; M, methylated.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 TSHR gene methylation in thyroid tumors

 
TSHR gene methylation, to be useful as a future diagnostic marker for cancer on fine-needle thyroid aspiration biopsy specimens, should be quantitative. We therefore tested the principle of real-time quantitative MSP for detecting and quantifying TSHR gene methylation in available needle-biopsy specimens from 8 benign thyroid adenomas and 10 thyroid cancers with a surgically confirmed diagnosis. As shown in Fig. 3Citation , all of the cancers positive for methylation (per standard MSP) showed a methylation level >6.0, whereas the benign samples (negative for methylation per standard MSP) showed a level <6.0. This cutoff value for the quantitative real-time MSP produced 100% specificity and sensitivity (Fig. 3)Citation but needs to be further evaluated in a prospective series.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Real-time quantitative MSP for TSHR gene in needle biopsy specimens. Needle biopsy specimens from benign adenomas and cancers with a surgically confirmed diagnosis and MSP-confirmed absence or presence of methylation, respectively, in the primary lesion. With a cutoff point of 6.0 for the TSHR/ß-actin ratio, this technique has 100% specificity and sensitivity.

 
Correlation of Methylation of TSHR Gene with Silencing.
Previous studies have shown that the WRO 82-1 thyroid tumor cell line normally expresses TSHR, whereas another thyroid tumor cell line, ARO-81-1, does not (32) . We therefore examined the methylation status of the TSHR gene promoters in these cell lines. We observed no TSHR gene methylation in WRO-82-1 cells, whereas ARO-81-1 and other cell lines all showed hypermethylation of this gene (Fig. 4A)Citation . We took a further step to compare the TSHR protein levels in these cells by Western blotting. Consistent with previous findings (32) , we saw abundant TSHR protein in WRO-82-1 cells, whereas the protein was virtually absent in ARO-81-1 cells (Fig. 4B)Citation . The TSHR protein was also not well expressed in all other thyroid cell lines (Fig. 4B)Citation , in which the TSHR gene was methylated (Fig. 4A)Citation . This dramatic difference in protein level was seen for both the glycosylated and unglycosylated forms of the TSHR protein. Similarly, RT-PCR showed abundant mRNA in WRO-82-1 cells but not in the other cell lines tested (Fig. 4C)Citation .



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison of the methylation status of TSHR gene and its expression in various cell lines. A, methylation status of TSHR by MSP. U, unmethylated; M, methylated. B, TSHR protein levels by Western blotting. The TSHR protein appears as 63-kDa glycosylated and 50-kDa unglycosylated products. Note that the standard TSHR protein (Std. TSHR; from Santa Cruz) shows a prominent glycosylated (upper) band, whereas the cellular TSHR protein shows a prominent unglycosylated (lower) band. ß-actin levels are shown for each sample as a quantitative control. C, RT-PCR products of TSHR and the corresponding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a quantitative control in various human thyroid cell lines.

 
It should be mentioned that RT-PCR did reveal a very faint band corresponding to TSHR in some of the non-WRO cells when the number of PCR cycles was increased (data not shown). As will be shown later, longer exposure of the Western blotting membrane also showed a faint TSHR protein band. These data suggest that baseline expression of TSHR, although very low, did exist in these cells. The minimal expression of TSHR in cells other than WRO-82-1 was probably attributable to the presence of a small fraction of cells without DNA methylation. Indeed, we often observed a very weak unmethylated band on MSP in these cell lines, as seen for KAK-1 cells and C643 cells in Fig. 2BCitation and KAT-7 cells in Fig. 4ACitation .

A previous study has shown that thyroglobulin release from WRO-82-1 cells is stimulated by the TSHR agonist TSH (33) , consistent with the expression of TSHR in this cell line. Human TSHR is coupled to arachidonic acid release (34) , and we found that TSH also stimulated arachidonic acid release in WRO-82-1 cells (data not shown), further demonstrating the functional presence of a TSHR in these cells. By contrast, we observed no response to TSH stimulation in the KAT-5 and KAT-10 thyroid cell lines (data not shown), in which TSHR was methylated and not well expressed (Fig. 4)Citation .

To further establish a role of TSHR gene methylation in silencing the gene, we tested the effects of the demethylating agent AdC on the methylation and expression status of the TSHR gene. As shown in Fig. 5, A and BCitation , the TSHR gene in KAT-10 cells could be partially demethylated by treating cells with AdC in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The TSHR gene was also demethylated by AdC treatment in other cell lines, such as KAT-5 cells (data not shown). Under similar conditions, the minimal basal TSHR protein level was significantly increased (Fig. 5C)Citation . These experiments, together with the DNA methylation data in epithelial thyroid tumors (Figs. 1Citation and 2Citation ; Table 1Citation ), suggest that aberrant methylation of the TSHR gene is an important mechanism for the loss of TSHR gene expression. Moreover, this change is at least partially reversible because demethylation restored expression of TSHR.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of AdC on methylation status and expression of TSHR in thyroid tumor cell lines. A, time course of the effects of AdC at 0.5 µM on TSHR gene methylation in KAT-10 cells. Increasing demethylation is seen through 66 h, followed by a plateau. B, concentration-response of the effects of AdC incubated for 66 h on TSHR gene methylation in KAT-10 cells. Increasing demethylation is seen through 0.5 µM AdC, followed by a plateau. C, effects of 0.5 µM AdC incubated for 48 h on TSHR protein levels by Western blotting in KAT-10 and KAT-5 cells. Increased TSHR protein is seen after treatment. Prolonged film exposure was required to reveal the faint signal in these cells. ß-actin protein levels are shown for each sample as a quantitative control. The cell culture medium was changed daily to replenish AdC at the indicated concentrations. Other details are described in "Materials and Methods." U, unmethylated; M, methylated.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Thyroid tumors are the most commonly encountered neoplasms in the endocrine system, and the vast majority are epithelial thyroid cancers, mainly FTCs and PTCs. Like tumors in other systems, genetic alterations have long been thought to play a fundamental role in thyroid carcinogenesis. This belief has been reinforced by the finding of germ-line mutations in the RET proto-oncogene in the rare familial forms of medullary thyroid cancers. Moreover, identification of these RET mutations is successfully used for clinical diagnosis (35) . However, despite numerous studies over the past two decades, few genetic mutations have been identified in the much more common epithelial types of thyroid cancers. Because epigenetic changes, such as gene methylation, play an important role in tumorigenesis via gene inactivation in other types of cancers, we investigated a role for methylation of the TSHR gene in epithelial thyroid tumors. There were several reasons that we chose the TSHR gene to study. The first reason is that TSHR plays a key role in effecting a number of tissue-specific thyrocyte functions, including iodide uptake by NIS, iodide oxidation and organification by thyroid peroxidase, and thyroglobulin production. The second reason is that decreased or absent TSHR expression has previously been found to be common in epithelial thyroid cancers. The third reason is that no inactivating TSHR gene mutations have been found in epithelial thyroid cancers, suggesting that alternative molecular mechanisms are involved in TSHR gene silencing.

Our studies indeed demonstrated aberrant methylation of the TSHR gene in epithelial thyroid cancers and implicated this epigenetic change in the loss of TSHR gene expression. We were intrigued to find that TSHR gene methylation occurs exclusively in malignant thyroid tumors. Like normal thyroid tissues, benign thyroid adenomas do not harbor promoter methylation. Therefore, TSHR gene methylation is a marker of malignancy that clearly distinguishes benign adenomas from epithelial thyroid cancers, particularly FTCs and PTCs, which showed a high promoter methylation frequency. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a widely used diagnostic procedure for thyroid nodules. However, indeterminate cytological findings are reported in as many as 20% of fine-needle aspirates, in which follicular variant PTC and FTC cannot be cytologically distinguished from benign follicular ademonas (36 , 37) . At present, most of these patients must undergo surgery, but only a minority of them are found to harbor cancer. Thus, defining the methylation status of the TSHR gene in biopsy tissues could help distinguish malignancy, particularly follicular variant PTCs and FTCs, from benign adenoma and assist with clinical decision-making. This idea is further supported by the applicability of real-time quantitative MSP as a potential future diagnostic tool for detecting and quantifying TSHR methylation and distinguishing benign thyroid adenomas from cancers (Fig. 3)Citation . We are not certain why ATC shows less frequent TSHR gene methylation. However, this finding may not be surprising in that FTCs and PTCs are mostly differentiated, whereas ATC is undifferentiated and has lost most of the classic features of FTC and PTC (38) .

Extending these findings, we have further shown, using thyroid tumor cell lines, that TSHR gene silencing, a postulated obstacle to TSH-stimulated radioactive iodine therapy of thyroid cancers, is related to DNA methylation. Although decreased or absent TSHR expression has been repeatedly found in epithelial thyroid tumors for more than a decade, the underlying molecular mechanism remained unknown. The present study has not only demonstrated frequent methylation of the TSHR gene in epithelial thyroid cancers, but also shown a close relationship between methylation of this gene and its silencing in human thyroid tumor cell lines. Using a demethylating agent, we were able to achieve partial demethylation of the TSHR gene and partially restore the expression of the protein product of this gene. In this context, it is interesting to note that benign thyroid adenomas are always found to express normal levels of TSHR, whereas impaired TSHR expression has been found only in malignant epithelial thyroid tumors (8 , 10 , 11) , consistent with the TSHR gene methylation patterns in the present study. Thus, our study provides evidence that aberrant DNA methylation is an important mechanism underlying TSHR gene silencing in malignant epithelial thyroid tumors.

Our present results on human TSHR gene methylation are consistent with previous studies on two rat thyroid cell lines (39) , which showed that unmethylated FRTL-5 cells express normal levels of TSHR, whereas in contrast, FRT cells, in which TSHR is methylated in the 5'-flanking area, do not express TSHR. Silencing of TSHR gene by methylation could theoretically be attributable to blocking of the interaction of the promoter site with regulatory factors. Indeed, the GA-binding protein, a transcription factor, was shown to normally bind the unmethylated TSHR promoter in FRTL-5 cells but unable to bind the methylated promoter in FRT cells (40) . It has previously been shown that oncogenic transformation of FRTL-5 cells led to loss of TSHR gene expression (41) . This result is consistent with the numerous reports showing that loss of TSHR gene expression is seen only in "transformed" malignant thyroid tumors but not in benign adenomas. It appears that malignant transformation triggers aberrant hypermethylation of the TSHR gene and shuts off its expression.

The diagnostic and therapeutic use of radioiodine for thyroid cancer is often thwarted by a lack of iodine-concentrating activity by malignant thyroid cells even with TSH stimulation. Our study suggests that this could be at least partially accounted for by the loss of TSHR expression via methylation-mediated TSHR gene silencing. In recent years, NIS was also found to be underexpressed in epithelial thyroid cancers (42, 43, 44) . Like TSHR, no NIS gene mutations were identified that could cause a decrease in NIS expression (45) . Instead, like aberrant methylation of TSHR, aberrant methylation of the NIS gene was also observed in thyroid cancers (42) . Interestingly, the same study also showed functional restoration of NIS expression by treatment of thyroid tumor cell lines with demethylating agents. On the basis of these studies and our own data on TSHR, we speculate that demethylating agents could restore the expression of both the TSHR and NIS genes in thyroid cancers and hence the capability of thyroid cancers to concentrate radioactive iodine in response to stimulation by TSH in thyroid cancer patients. This is clinically feasible, particularly in view of the availability of non-nucleoside demethylating agents, such as procainamide, a commonly used antiarrythmic drug (46) . This drug lacks the side effects of the nucleoside-analogue demethylating agents (such as AdC) and has recently been demonstrated to be able to demethylate genes and restore their expressions both in vitro and in vivo (47) .

In summary, we have demonstrated aberrant TSHR gene methylation in human epithelial thyroid cancers as a molecular pathway underlying the silencing of this gene in these cancers. Because TSHR gene methylation is not seen in benign thyroid adenomas, it may have use as a novel diagnostic marker of malignancy to distinguish FTC from benign adenoma. Moreover, the ability to achieve restoration of gene expression by demethylating agents suggests that DNA demethylating agents could be used to improve the efficiency of TSH-promoted radioiodine therapy in epithelial thyroid cancers, particularly in those that have lost the response to TSH manipulation. These diagnostic and therapeutic implications of TSHR gene methylation for thyroid tumor clearly deserve further clinical investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Barry Trink and Shuji Nomoto for very helpful advice during the course of this study. We also thank James Engles, Robert Yochem, and Nicole Benoit for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by NIH Grants UO1 CA 98-028 and RO1 DE13561-01. Funding for the study described in this article was also provided by Virco, Inc. Under a licensing agreement between The Johns Hopkins University and Virco, Dr. Sidransky is entitled to a share of royalties received by the University on sales or products described in this article. The University and Dr. Sidransky own Virco stock, which is subject to certain restrictions under University policy. Dr. Sidransky is a paid consultant to Virco. The terms of this arrangement are being managed by The Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. M. X. is supported by NIH Grant 2-T32-DK07751-05 at the Johns Hopkins Endocrinology and Metabolism Fellowship program. Back

2 These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Present address: Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung Innere Medizin II, Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Back

4 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 818 Ross Research Building, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196. Phone: (410) 502-5153; Fax: (410) 614-1411; E-mail: dsidrans{at}jhmi.edu Back

5 The abbreviations used are: TSHR, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor; NIS, sodium-iodine symporter; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; AdC, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; Tm, melting temperature; [3H]AA, [5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15-3H]arachidonic acid; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; ATC, anaplastic thyroid cancer. Back

Received 10/ 9/02. Accepted 3/ 4/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Vassart G., Dumont J. E. Thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. Endocr. Rev., 13: 596-611, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kopp P. The TSH receptor and its role in thyroid disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58: 1301-1322, 2001.[Medline]
  3. Tonacchera M, Agretti P, Pinchera A, Rosellini V, Perri A, Collecchi P, Vitti P, Chiovato L. Congenital hypothyroidism with impaired thyroid response to thyrotropin (TSH) and absent circulating thyroglobulin: evidence for a new inactivating mutation of the TSH receptor gene. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 85: 1001-1008, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ladenson P. W., Ewertz M. E., Dickey R. A. Practical application of recombinant thyrotropin testing in clinical practice. Endocr. Pract., 7: 195-201, 2001.[Medline]
  5. McDougall I. R., Weigel R. J. Recombinant human thyrotropin in the management of thyroid cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 13: 39-43, 2001.[Medline]
  6. Fatourechi V., Hay I. D. Treating the patient with differentiated thyroid cancer with thyroglobulin-positive iodine-131 diagnostic scan-negative metastases: including comments on the role of serum thyroglobulin monitoring in tumor surveillance. Semin. Nucl. Med., 30: 107-114, 2000.[Medline]
  7. McDougall I. R. Management of thyroglobulin positive/whole-body scan negative: is Tg positive/131I therapy useful?. J. Endocrinol. Investig., 24: 194-198, 2001.[Medline]
  8. Brabant G., Maenhaut C., Kohrle J., Scheumann G., Dralle H., Hoang-Vu C., Hesch R. D., von zur Muhlen A., Vassart G., Dumont J. E. Human thyrotropin receptor gene: expression in thyroid tumors and correlation to markers of thyroid differentiation and dedifferentiation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 82: R7-R12, 1991.[Medline]
  9. Ohta K., Endo T., Onaya T. The mRNA levels of thyrotropin receptor, thyroglobulin and thyroid peroxidase in neoplastic human thyroid tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 174: 1148-1153, 1991.[Medline]
  10. Bronnegard M., Torring O., Boos J., Sylven C., Marcus C., Wallin G. Expression of thyrotropin receptor and thyroid hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic human thyroid tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 79: 384-389, 1994.[Abstract]
  11. Elisei R., Pinchera A., Romei C., Gryczynska M., Pohl V., Maenhaut C., Fugazzola L., Pacini F. Expression of thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSH-R), thyroglobulin, thyroperoxidase, and calcitonin messenger ribonucleic acids in thyroid carcinomas: evidence of TSH-R gene transcript in medullary histotype. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 78: 867-871, 1994.[Abstract]
  12. Tanaka K., Inoue H., Miki H., Kansei K., Monden Y. Heterogeneous distribution of thyrotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (TSH-R mRNA) in papillary thyroid carcinoma detected by in situ hybridization. Clin. Endocrinol., 44: 259-267, 1996.[Medline]
  13. Sheils O. M., Sweeney E. C. TSH receptor status of thyroid neoplasms-TaqMan RT-PCR analysis of archival material. J. Pathol., 188: 87-92, 1999.[Medline]
  14. Porcellini A., Fenzi G., Avvedimento E. V. Mutations of thyrotropin receptor gene. J. Mol. Med., 75: 567-575, 1997.[Medline]
  15. Russo D., Arturi F., Chiefari E., Filetti S. Thyrotropin receptor: a role for thyroid tumourigenesis?. Forum (Genova), 9: 166-175, 1999.[Medline]
  16. Matsuo K., Friedman E., Gejman P. V., Fagin J. A. The thyrotropin receptor (TSH-R) is not an oncogene for thyroid tumors: structural studies of the TSH-R and the {alpha}-subunit of Gs in human thyroid neoplasms. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 76: 1446-1451, 1993.[Abstract]
  17. Russo D., Arturi F., Schlumberger M., Caillou B., Monier R., Filetti S., Suarez H. G. Activating mutations of the TSH receptor in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene, 11: 1907-1911, 1995.[Medline]
  18. Spambalg D., Sharifi N., Elisei R., Gross J. L., Medeiros-Neto G., Fagin J. A. Structural studies of the thyrotropin receptor and Gs alpha in human thyroid cancers: low prevalence of mutations predicts infrequent involvement in malignant transformation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 81: 3898-3901, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bird A. P. CpG rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature (Lond.), 321: 209-213, 1986.[Medline]
  20. Bird A. P. The relationship of DNA methylation to cancer. Cancer Surv., 28: 87-101, 1996.[Medline]
  21. Sidransky D. Circulating DNA-what we know and what we need to learn. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 906: 1-4,
  22. Baylin S. B., Esteller M., Rountree M. R., Bachman K. E., Schuebel K., Herman J. G. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10: 687-692, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Califano J. A., Johns M. M., III, Westra W. H., Lango M. N., Eisele D., Saji M., Zeiger M. A., Udelsman R., Koch W. M., Sidransky D. An allelotype of papillary thyroid cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 69: 442-444, 1996.[Medline]
  24. Jeronimo C., Usadel H., Henrique R., Oliveira J., Lopes C., Nelson W. G., Sidransky D. Quantitation of GSTP1 methylation in non-neoplastic prostatic tissue and organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 93: 1747-1752, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Nawroz H., Koch W., Anker P., Stroun M., Sidransky D. Microsatellite alterations in serum DNA of head and neck cancer patients. Nat. Med., 2: 1035-1037, 1996.[Medline]
  26. Gross B., Misrahi M., Sar S., Milgrom E. Composite structure of the human thyrotropin receptor gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 177: 679-687, 1991.[Medline]
  27. Fliss M. S., Usadel H., Caballero O. L., Wu L., Buta M. R., Eleff S. M., Jen J., Sidransky D. Facile detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in tumors and bodily fluids. Science (Wash. DC), 287: 2017-2019, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Herman J. G., Graff J. R., Myohanen S., Nelkin B. D., Baylin S. B. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 9821-9826, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rosas S. L. B., Koch W., da Costa Carvalho M. G., Wu L., Califano J., Westra W., Jen J., Sidransky D. Promoter hypermethylation patterns of p16. O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, and death-associated protein kinase in tumors and saliva of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res., 61: 939-942, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Patibandla S. A., Seetharamaiah G. S., Dallas J. S., Thotakura N. R., Peake R. L., Prabhakar B. S. Differential reactivities of recombinant glycosylated ectodomains of mouse and human thyrotropin receptors with patient autoantibodies. Endocrinology, 138: 1559-1566, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Xing M., Post S., Ostrom R. S., Samardzija M., Insel P. A. Inhibition of phospholipase A2-mediated arachidonic acid release by cyclic AMP defines a negative feedback loop for P2Y receptor activation in Madin-Darby canine kidney D1 cells. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 10035-10038, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chen S. T., Shieh H. Y., Lin J. D., Chang K. S. S., Lin K. H. Over-expression of thyroid hormone receptor ß1 is associated with thyrotropin receptor gene expression and proliferation in a human thyroid carcinoma cell line. J. Endocrinol., 165: 379-389, 2000.[Abstract]
  33. Estour B., Van Herle A. J., Juillard G. J., Totanes T. L., Sparkes R. S., Giuliano A. E., Klandorf H. Characterization of a human follicular thyroid carcinoma cell line (UCLA RO 82 W-1). Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol. Incl. Mol. Pathol., 57: 167-174, 1989.[Medline]
  34. Di Cerbo A., Di Paola R., Menzaghi C., De Filippis V., Tahara K., Corda D., Kohn L. D. Graves’ immunoglobulins activate phospholipase A2 by recognizing specific epitopes on thyrotropin receptor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 84: 3283-3292, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Randolph G. W., Maniar D. Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer Control, 7: 253-261, 2000.[Medline]
  36. McCaffrey T. V. Evaluation of the thyroid nodule. Cancer Control, 7: 223-228, 2000.[Medline]
  37. Belfiore A., La Rosa G. L. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am., 30: 361-400, 2001.[Medline]
  38. Ain K. B. Management of undifferentiated thyroid cancer. Baillieres Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 14: 615-629, 2000.[Medline]
  39. Ikuyama S., Niller H. H., Shimura H., Akamizu T., Kohn L. D. Characterization of the 5'-flanking region of the rat thyrotropin receptor gene. Mol. Endocrinol., 6: 793-804, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Yokomori N., Tawata M., Saito T., Shimura H., Onaya T. Regulation of the rat thyroid receptor gene by the methylation-sensitive transcription factor GA-binding protein. Mol. Endocrinol., 12: 1241-1249, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Berlingieri M. T., Akamizu T., Fusco A., Grieco M., Colletta G., Cirafici A. M., Ikuyama S., Kohn L. D., Vecchio G. Thyrotropin receptor gene expression in oncogene-transfected rat thyroid cells: correlation between transformation, loss of thyrotropin receptor gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 173: 172-178, 1990.[Medline]
  42. Venkataraman G. M., Yatin M., Marcinek R., Ain K. B. Restoration of iodide uptake in dedifferentiated thyroid carcinoma: relationship to human Na+/I-symporter gene methylation status. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 84: 2449-2457, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Park H. J., Kim J. Y., Park K. Y., Gong G., Hong S. J., Ahn I. M. Expressions of human sodium iodide symporter mRNA in primary and metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas. Thyroid, 10: 211-217, 2000.[Medline]
  44. Ringel M. D., Anderson J, Souza S. L., Burch H. B., Tambascia M., Shriver C. D., Tuttle R. M. Expression of the sodium iodide symporter and thyroglobulin genes are reduced in papillary thyroid cancer. Mod. Pathol., 14: 289-296, 2001.[Medline]
  45. Russo D., Manole D., Arturi F., Suarez H. G., Schlumberger M., Filetti S., Derwahl M. Absence of sodium/iodide symporter gene mutations in differentiated human thyroid carcinomas. Thyroid, 11: 37-39, 2001.[Medline]
  46. Scheinbart L. S., Johnson M. A., Gross L. A., Edelstein S. R., Richardson B. C. Procainamide inhibits DNA methyltransferase in a human T cell line. J. Rheumatol., 18: 530-534, 1991.[Medline]
  47. Lin X., Asgari K., Putzi M. J., Gage W. R., Yu X., Cornblatt B. S., Kumar A., Piantadosi S., DeWeese T. L., De Marzo A. M., Nelson W. G. Reversal of GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and reactivation of {pi}-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) expression in human prostate cancer cells by treatment with procainamide. Cancer Res., 61: 8611-8616, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. R. Haymart
Understanding the Relationship Between Age and Thyroid Cancer
Oncologist, March 1, 2009; 14(3): 216 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
G. Riesco-Eizaguirre and P. Santisteban
New insights in thyroid follicular cell biology and its impact in thyroid cancer therapy
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 957 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Xing
BRAF Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Pathogenic Role, Molecular Bases, and Clinical Implications
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 742 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Joseph, M. Ji, D. Liu, P. Hou, and M. Xing
Lack of Mutations in the Thyroid Hormone Receptor (TR) {alpha} and Genes but Frequent Hypermethylation of the TR Gene in Differentiated Thyroid Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4766 - 4770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
L. R Rowe, B. G Bentz, and J. S Bentz
Detection of BRAF V600E activating mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma using PCR with allele-specific fluorescent probe melting curve analysis
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1211 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
J. A. Smith, C.-Y. Fan, C. Zou, D. Bodenner, and M. S. Kokoska
Methylation Status of Genes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2007; 133(10): 1006 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. C.G. van Staveren, D. W. Solis, L. Delys, L. Duprez, G. Andry, B. Franc, G. Thomas, F. Libert, J. E. Dumont, V. Detours, et al.
Human Thyroid Tumor Cell Lines Derived from Different Tumor Types Present a Common Dedifferentiated Phenotype
Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8113 - 8120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Xing
Gene Methylation in Thyroid Tumorigenesis
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 948 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Liu, S. Hu, P. Hou, D. Jiang, S. Condouris, and M. Xing
Suppression of BRAF/MEK/MAP Kinase Pathway Restores Expression of Iodide-Metabolizing Genes in Thyroid Cells Expressing the V600E BRAF Mutant
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 13(4): 1341 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Hu, M. Ewertz, R. P. Tufano, M. Brait, A. L. Carvalho, D. Liu, A. P. Tufaro, S. Basaria, D. S. Cooper, D. Sidransky, et al.
Detection of Serum Deoxyribonucleic Acid Methylation Markers: A Novel Diagnostic Tool for Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 98 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Xing, W. H. Westra, R. P. Tufano, Y. Cohen, E. Rosenbaum, K. J. Rhoden, K. A. Carson, V. Vasko, A. Larin, G. Tallini, et al.
BRAF Mutation Predicts a Poorer Clinical Prognosis for Papillary Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6373 - 6379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. O. Hoque, E. Rosenbaum, W. H. Westra, M. Xing, P. Ladenson, M. A. Zeiger, D. Sidransky, and C. B. Umbricht
Quantitative Assessment of Promoter Methylation Profiles in Thyroid Neoplasms
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4011 - 4018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M Xing
BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 245 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Kesmodel, I. Prabakaran, R. Canter, C. Menon, K. Molnar-Kimber, and D. Fraker
Virus-Mediated Oncolysis of Thyroid Cancer by a Replication-Selective Adenovirus Driven by a Thyroglobulin Promoter-Enhancer Region
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3440 - 3448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Xing, R. P. Tufano, A. P. Tufaro, S. Basaria, M. Ewertz, E. Rosenbaum, P. J. Byrne, J. Wang, D. Sidransky, and P. W. Ladenson
Detection of BRAF Mutation on Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens: A New Diagnostic Tool for Papillary Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2867 - 2872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H.-T. Zhang, X.-F. Chen, M.-H. Wang, J.-C. Wang, Q.-Y. Qi, R.-M. Zhang, W.-Q. Xu, Q.-Y. Fei, F. Wang, Q.-Q. Cheng, et al.
Defective Expression of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Receptor Type II Is Associated with CpG Methylated Promoter in Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2359 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Xing, V. Vasko, G. Tallini, A. Larin, G. Wu, R. Udelsman, M. D. Ringel, P. W. Ladenson, and D. Sidransky
BRAF T1796A Transversion Mutation in Various Thyroid Neoplasms
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1365 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Xing, Y. Cohen, E. Mambo, G. Tallini, R. Udelsman, P. W. Ladenson, and D. Sidransky
Early Occurrence of RASSF1A Hypermethylation and Its Mutual Exclusion with BRAF Mutation in Thyroid Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 64(5): 1664 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Xing, Y. Tokumaru, G. Wu, W. B. Westra, P. W. Ladenson, and D. Sidransky
Hypermethylation of the Pendred Syndrome Gene SLC26A4 Is an Early Event in Thyroid Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 63(9): 2312 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidransky, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidransky, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online