| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
on Astrocytomas
1Departments of Immunology and 2Pathology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, and Divisions of 3Hematology/Oncology, 4Rheumatology, and 5Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 is an immunoglobulin superfamily transmembrane glycoprotein that is normally expressed in subsets of myeloid and neuronal cells. Transfection of many cell types with SIRP
1, including glioblastomas, has been shown to inhibit their proliferation in response to a range of growth factors. Furthermore, the expression of a murine SIRP
1 mutant has been shown to enhance cell adhesion and initial cell spreading but to inhibit cell extension and movement. The extracellular portion of SIRP
1 binds CD47 (integrin-associated protein), although this interaction is not required for integrin-mediated activation of SIRP
1. On phosphorylation, SIRP
1 recruits the tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2, which are important in its functions. Although SHP-1 is uniquely expressed on hematopoietic cells, SHP-2 is ubiquitously expressed, so that SIRP
1 has the potential to function in many cell types, including astrocytomas. Because SIRP
1 regulates cell functions that may contribute to the malignancy of these tumors, we examined the expression of SIRPs in astrocytoma cell lines by flow cytometry using a monoclonal antibody against all SIRPs. Screening of nine cell lines revealed clear cell surface expression of SIRPs on five cell lines, whereas Northern blotting for SIRP
transcripts showed mRNA present in eight of nine cell lines. All nine cell lines expressed the ligand for SIRP
1, CD47. To further examine the expression and function of SIRPs, we studied the SF126 and U373MG astrocytoma cell lines, both of which express SIRPs, in greater detail. SIRP transcripts in these cells are identical in sequence to SIRP
1. The expressed deglycosylated protein is the same size as SIRP
1, but in the astrocytoma cells, it is underglycosylated compared with SIRP
1 produced in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. It is nonetheless still capable of binding soluble CD47. Moreover, SIRP
1 in each of the two cell lines recruited SHP-2 on phosphorylation, and SIRP
1 phosphorylation in cultured cells is CD47 dependent. Finally, examination of frozen sections from 10 primary brain tumor biopsies by immunohistochemistry revealed expression of SIRPs on seven of the specimens, some of which expressed high levels of SIRPs. Most of the tumors also expressed CD47. This is the first demonstration that astrocytomas can express SIRP
. Given the known role of SIRP
in regulating cell adhesion and responses to mitogenic growth factors, the expression of SIRP
1 on astrocytomas may be of considerable importance in brain tumor biology, and it offers the potential of a new avenue for therapeutic intervention. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 are expressed in rats (SHPS-1, MFR, and p93), mice (p84 and BIT), and cattle (MyD-1). SIRP
receptors have a cytoplasmic tail that includes several immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs). Phosphorylation of the tyrosines in these motifs leads to the recruitment and activation of tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 (3
, 4)
. SIRPß receptors have only a short cytoplasmic tail, with no ITIMs. Instead, they express a charged residue in the transmembrane domain, which permits association with the adapter protein DAP12 (5
, 6)
. SIRPß receptors have been identified only in cells of the monocyte, macrophage, or dendritic lineages. Although initial reports using tissue Northern blotting suggested that SIRP
receptors are expressed ubiquitously (4)
, studies of protein expression suggest expression primarily in myeloid cells, subsets of brain cells (7
, 8)
, and endothelial cells (9
, 10)
. In the central nervous system, SIRP
receptors are expressed in the granular and molecular layers of the cerebellum as well as in various regions of the hippocampus, retina, and olfactory bulb (11, 12, 13)
. During development, SIRP
is expressed by embryonic day 9 on the floor plate region of the ventral neuraxis, and it is rapidly up-regulated by postnatal days 25 (14
, 15)
. Examination of brain cell subtypes has established that SIRP
is expressed on cortical neurons as well as microglia, whereas neonatal astrocytes or cultured oligodendrocytes do not express detectable SIRP
(7)
.
A ligand for SIRP
is CD47, as demonstrated by the binding of soluble SIRP
fusion proteins to CD47 (10
, 16, 17, 18, 19)
and binding of soluble CD47 to SIRP
expressed on myeloid cells (20
, 21)
. In the mouse retina, the expression of CD47 and SIRP
is colocalized, and CD47-deficient mice show an altered pattern of SIRP
expression, especially in the cellular and plexiform layers of the retina, suggesting a functional association between the two molecules (12
, 16)
. In rats, SIRP
expressed in neuronal cells demonstrates reduced glycosylation compared with SIRP
from myeloid cells, resulting in altered binding affinity to tissue sections or plant lectins (13
, 22
, 23)
, and SIRP
on neuronal cells exhibits differential glycosylation during embryonic development (15)
. Evidence of differential glycosylation is also seen in the MM5/C1 mouse mammary carcinoma and the A431 human epidermal carcinoma cell lines (4)
, and rat SIRP
expressed on peritoneal macrophages exhibits reduced glycosylation compared with SIRP
on alveolar macrophages (24)
. The functional significance of this altered glycosylation is unknown, but it might alter the avidity to of SIRP
1 for CD47, its isoforms, or other unknown ligands.
The initial characterization of human SIRP
cDNAs revealed several different sequences. For most SIRP
cDNAs, these differences clustered in the membrane distal immunoglobulin region (the V region), although for one cDNA (SIRP
3), the sequence differences were distributed throughout the coding sequence (4)
. It appears likely that at least two cDNA variants for SIRP
(named SIRP
1 and The gene for SIRP
2 in the initial report above) are alleles of the same locus. The gene for SIRP
1 can undergo alternative splicing, producing a low abundance cDNA that excludes the second and third immunoglobulin-like domains, and there are two polyadenylation sites that can yield the two predominant transcript sizes seen on Northern blotting (11
, 25)
.
SIRP
is phosphorylated on its ITIMs in response to a variety of mitogenic growth factors [epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor, insulin, neurotrophins, growth hormone], cytokines (interleukin 1ß and tumor necrosis factor
), and lysophosphatidic acid or after integrin-mediated adhesion to extracellular matrix components (reviewed in Refs. 1
and 2
). In the case of adhesion, this phosphorylation is dependent on Src family kinases (26, 27, 28)
, but the kinases responsible for mitogen-stimulated phosphorylation of SIRP
remain unclear. In addition to being phosphorylated by these stimuli, SIRP
down-regulates responsiveness to EGF (4)
, growth hormone (29, 30, 31)
, insulin-like growth factor (4
, 32)
, serum (3
, 4 , 33)
, neurotrophins (34
, 35)
, and lysophosphatidic acid (36)
. Furthermore, perhaps through its influence on integrin-mediated responses, SIRP
regulates cellular adhesion and/or motility. For example, migration of monocytes or neutrophils is reduced by blocking the interaction of SIRP
with CD47 (21
, 37)
, and the migration of fibroblasts derived from SIRP
mutant mice reveals defective cell spreading on fibronectin, although adhesion is enhanced (38)
. Furthermore, the process of giant cell formation by macrophage fusion involves phosphorylation of SIRP
, and blockade of the SIRP
-CD47 interaction is sufficient to inhibit fusion (24
, 39)
. Transfection of SIRP
into the glioblastoma cell line U87MG similarly inhibits cell migration and spreading on fibronectin (40)
. Direct aggregation of Ba/F3 B cells to each other can be mediated by SIRP
-CD47 interactions (17)
, and neurite outgrowth and adhesion are augmented on surfaces coated with affinity-purified mouse SIRP
(14
, 41)
.
Given the involvement of SIRP
in regulating mitogenesis, cell motility, and adhesion, its expression on tumor cells might be expected to alter their malignant properties. In support of this, SIRP
expression is reduced in blasts from both chronic and acute myeloid leukemias (42)
. By Northern blotting, SIRP
expression in hepatocellular carcinomas is inversely proportional to tumor size and/or metastasis (43
, 44)
. Expression of transforming v-src in fibroblasts down-regulates SIRP
, whereas overexpression of SIRP
reduces anchorage-independent cell growth (45)
. Although SIRP
is not normally expressed on B cells, representational difference analysis of a Burkitts lymphoma B-cell line has demonstrated up-regulation of SIRP
on immunoglobulin cross-linking (46)
. Recent reports have also shown reduced expression of SIRP
in breast cancer relative to paired normal breast tissues, as examined by Western blotting, although the cell types that expressed SIRP
were not identified (47)
. Finally, transfection of SIRP
into the glioblastoma cell line U87MG affects a number of tumor-related characteristics, including reduced focus formation, increased susceptibility to radiation-induced apoptosis, reduced cell migration and spreading, and reduced EGF-induced phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase activation (40)
. Interestingly, in U87MG cells, SIRP
has no apparent effect on cell proliferation or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity as measured by extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1, ERK2, and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase phosphorylation of in vitro substrates. This latter finding is similar to results in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, where expression of SIRP
does not affect phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 in response to EGF (33)
. In contrast, SIRP
transfected into NIH3T3 cells inhibits EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 (4)
, and SIRP
transfected into either NIH3T3 or Rat1 cells expressing insulin receptor augments insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of MAPK (32)
. Thus, the ultimate effects of SIRP
expression may depend on the cell in which it is expressed as well as the signaling complexes in question.
To address the role of SIRP
in the biology of human tumors, we generated a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against SIRPs and used this to survey a panel of cell lines derived from malignant brain tumors for SIRP expression. We found that five of nine cell lines expressed SIRP
, and all cell lines expressed CD47, the ligand for SIRP
1. The SIRP
expressed on all astrocytoma cell lines bound to a soluble CD47 fusion protein. Additional studies of the astrocytoma cell lines SF126 and U373MG confirmed that the expressed SIRP is SIRP
1, that it can associate in these cells with the signaling adapter molecule SHP-2, and that its phosphorylation in cultured cells is CD47 dependent. Finally, we have shown by immunohistochemistry on 10 frozen sections that SIRPs and CD47 are expressed on primary brain tumor biopsies. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that SIRP
1 is expressed on astrocytomas. The demonstration that SIRP
1 can function in these cells may be important in the biological and malignant properties of astrocytomas.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and SIRPß1 were kindly provided by Axel Ullrich (4)
. These genes were modified by addition of a sequence encoding the FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) at the 5' end of each expressed gene product. The genes for these FLAG-tagged proteins were then subcloned into the pMXneo (for SIRP
1) or BSR
(for SIRPß1) expression plasmids (obtained courtesy of Andrey Shaw; Washington University, St. Louis, MO), purified on Qiagen columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), transfected into CHO cells by using FuGENE (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and selected with G418 at 1 mg/ml (Mediatech) or puromycin at 10 µg/ml (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), respectively, to create the cell lines CHO-SIRP
and CHO-SIRPß. Expression was verified by the presence of a FLAG epitope detected with the anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma).
Antibodies and Flow Cytometry.
The B6H12 anti-CD47 antibody was obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA), and our 2D3 anti-CD47 antibody has been described previously (20)
. As described under "Results," the 2D3 mAb does not block binding of CD47 to SIRP
1 but, instead, enhances it. The B-1 mouse mAb against SHP-2 and polyclonal goat antiserum (C-20) against a COOH-terminal peptide of SIRP
1 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Biotech (Santa Cruz, CA). A mAb against SIRP
was raised by immunizing BALB/c mice with CHO-SIRP
, constructed as described above. Mice were boosted four times, and spleens were harvested 3 days after the last boost and fused with SP2/0 cells using standard methods. Clones expressing antibodies with reactivity against 293T cells transfected with SIRP
1, but not against untransfected cells, were subcloned and expanded. The resulting antibody, named 6.1, binds to both SIRP
1 and SIRPß1. Flow cytometry was performed by using a FACScan (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Fluorescein-conjugated antimouse IgG antibodies were obtained from ICN (Aurora, OH). Phycoerythrin-conjugated antihuman IgG Fc-specific antibody was from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).
Binding of CD47 Fusion Protein to SIRP
.
A fusion protein (CD47Fc) between the large extracellular loop of CD47 (which includes the ligand binding site for SIRP
) and the human IgG1 constant region has been described previously (20)
. To test for binding of CD47Fc to cells, 1 µg of the fusion protein and 1 µg of the enhancing antibody 2D3 were added to 106 cells. Cells were incubated for 1 h on ice, washed extensively in PBS, and incubated with phycoerythrin-conjugated antibody against human Fc (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). This antibody showed no reactivity against mouse IgG and thus did not bind appreciably to cells coated with murine anti-CD47 antibodies. Binding was detected by flow cytometry as described above. Where indicated, the binding of CD47Fc to SIRP
was blocked by addition of the 6.1 anti-SIRP antibody at 5 µg/ml.
Western Blotting.
Cells were lysed with 1% digitonin, and immunoprecipitation was performed with the indicated mAb linked to protein G-Sepharose (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ), as described previously (51)
. Lysates were resolved by nonreducing 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by semi-dry transfer. Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) and 1% BSA, incubated with the appropriate primary antibody diluted in the same solution for 1 h at room temperature, washed extensively in TBST, and then incubated with the appropriate second step antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were again extensively washed in TBST, and bound antibody was visualized with SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and exposure to film (Hyperfilm, Amersham). Second-step antibodies used included horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse IgG antiserum (Amersham) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated swine antigoat IgG antiserum (Caltag, Burlingame, CA).
Deglycosylation of Proteins.
After immunoprecipitation with mAb 6.1, lysates were denatured in 0.5% SDS, and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride was added to 1 mM. Deglycosylation was performed with PNGaseF (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) overnight at 37°C per the manufacturers directions, after which samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting as described above, using the C-20 goat antiserum against the SIRP
cytoplasmic domain (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Biotech).
Northern Blotting.
Total RNA was isolated from cells by using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and 50 µg were enriched for polyadenylated RNA by using Oligotex beads (Qiagen). RNA was separated on 1% agarose formaldehyde gels and transferred to Hybond-N+ (Amersham) by capillary transfer in 20x SSC. Membranes were cross-linked by baking at 80°C for 2 h, prehybridized for 1 h at 42°C with UltraHyb (Ambion, Austin, TX), and hybridized overnight to a DNA probe from the 3' end of the SIRP
gene labeled with 32P (Rediprime II; Amersham). Membranes were washed at medium stringency and exposed to film (BioMax MS; Kodak, Rochester, NY). To standardize loading, after probing for SIRP
1, the blot was stripped by incubating membranes for 30 min in 0.1x SSC/1% SDS at 80°C. The membranes were then reprobed with a 32P-labeled probe for ß-actin.
Reverse Transcription, PCR, and Sequencing.
First-strand cDNA was synthesized from RNA, isolated as described above, by using either oligo(dT)1218 (Roche) or a primer specific to the 3'-untranslated region of SIRP
(5'-CGGGGAGGCAGTCGAGGGTCTTCAAAAC-3') together with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers directions. After first-strand synthesis was complete, RNA was degraded with RNaseH (Roche), and 1 µl was used for subsequent PCR amplification using Taq polymerase (Roche). To clone the bulk of the coding region of SIRP
, the following primer pair was used: 5'-GGCGGGTGAGGAGGAGCTGCAGGTGAT-3' (predicted to hybridize upstream from the V region) and 5'-GCGGGCTGCGGGCTGGTCTGAATG-3' (predicted to hybridize near the second ITIM motif). To clone the cytoplasmic tail and part of the 3'-untranslated region, the following primer pair was used: 5'-GCCCGAGAAGAATGCCAGAGAAATAACACA-3' (predicted to hybridize between the transmembrane domain and the first ITIM) and 5'-CGGGGAGGCAGTCGAGGGTCTTCAAAA-3' (predicted to hybridize 320 bp downstream of the stop codon). PCR fragments were resolved on 1.2% agarose gels, purified with the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), and cloned using the TOPO PCR cloning system (Invitrogen). All sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis was performed at the Biomolecular Resource Center at UCSF.
Pervanadate Stimulation and SHP-2 Association.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of cell proteins was nonspecifically enhanced by incubation in 10 mM sodium orthovanadate and 0.6% hydrogen peroxide (pervanadate) for 5 min as described previously (51)
. After incubation, cells were rapidly pelleted and lysed in digitonin as described above. Immunoprecipitation with the B-1 anti-SHP-2 antibody linked to protein G-Sepharose and Western blotting with the 6.1 anti-SIRP
antibody were performed as described above. Blots were subsequently stripped under mild conditions (ReBlot Plus; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) and reprobed with anti-SHP-2 antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).
Cell Stimulation by Aggregation.
To stimulate cells by aggregation, astrocytoma cell lines were harvested, washed twice in PBS, resuspended in serum-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% low endotoxin Cohn analogue BSA (Sigma), and added to standard tissue culture plates (Corning, NY) at 5 x 106 cells/plate. When indicated, plates were coated with vitronectin by incubating plates overnight at 4°C with human vitronectin (Sigma) at 10 µg/ml. Appropriate blocking antibodies were added at 5 µg/ml. After overnight incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, digitonin cell lysates were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation, resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride, and analyzed for phosphotyrosine by using the mAb 4G10 as described above. To verify the level of SIRP
, blots were reprobed with biotinylated 6.1 anti-SIRP antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (Pierce), and bound complexes were detected using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium substrate (Roche) per the manufacturers directions.
Immunohistochemistry.
Multiple sections from frozen specimens of brain tumor biopsies were obtained from the Neurosurgery Tissue Bank at UCSF through a protocol approved by the Human Studies Committee. Sections were stored desiccated at -20°C until ready for use. One section was stained with H&E and evaluated by one of us (E. J. H.) to verify the diagnosis of grade 4 astrocytoma and to quantify the percentage of tumor in each sample. To perform immunohistochemistry with anti-SIRP (mAb 6.1) or anti-CD47 (mAb B6H12), slides were fixed for 5 min in acetone, washed twice in PBS, and incubated with serum-free blocking solution (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed twice in PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the primary antibody diluted to 1 µg/ml in PBS with 1% BSA. Bound antibodies were detected by using the LSAB2 avidin-biotin complex system (DAKO) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine per the manufacturers directions. After chromogen development, cells were counterstained for 5 min with hematoxylin (Sigma), dehydrated in xylene, and mounted with Permount (Fisher) per standard protocols. Slides were subsequently read in a blinded fashion by E. J. H. for binding of antibody to SIRP or to CD47. The method of scoring is presented in "Results."
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and CD47 Are Expressed on Astrocytoma Cell Lines.
1. One antibody, 6.1, reacts with SIRP
1 expressed on either CHO cells or 293T cells, but not untransfected cells. This antibody cross-reacts with SIRPß1, reflecting the extensive homology between the extracellular domain of these two genes (4)
. To test for expression of SIRPs on astrocytoma cell lines, the 6.1 antibody was used in fluorescence analysis of a panel of nine cell lines obtained from the Neurosurgery Tissue Bank at UCSF. As shown in Fig. 1
, by using the antibody B6H12. All cell lines expressed high levels of CD47 (Fig. 1)
|
and Is Underglycosylated.
and SIRPß. To formally test for the expression of SIRP
, two astrocytoma cell lines demonstrating the highest reactivity to the 6.1 mAb (SF126 and U373MG) were subjected to immunoprecipitation with mAb 6.1 followed by Western blotting with a commercial antiserum against a peptide in the cytoplasmic tail of SIRP
1. SIRPß does not contain a homologous region and thus does not react with this antiserum. As controls, lysates prepared from CHO cells, CHO cells transfected with the SIRP
1 gene (CHO-SIRP
1), and CHO cells transfected with the SIRPß1 gene (CHO-SIRPß1) were also analyzed in parallel. As shown in the first five lanes (no PNGase) of Fig. 2
- specific antiserum in the CHO-SIRP
1, SF126, and U373MG cell lines but not the untransfected CHO cells or the CHO-SIRPß1 line. This band migrates at Mr 70,00090,000 in CHO-SIRP
1 but at Mr 65,00075,000 in the astrocytoma cell lines.
|
from CHO-SIRP
1 and SIRP
astrocytoma cell lines reflects differences in glycosylation. For these studies, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated as described above and then subjected to deglycosylation with PNGaseF (Fig. 2
from both CHO-SIRP
and the astrocytoma cell lines bands migrated as a doublet at Mr 53,00057,000. The smaller size is the predicted molecular weight for human SIRP
(4)
, and the larger band likely represents incomplete deglycosylation. Thus, the discrepancy in molecular weight between SIRP
expressed on transfected CHO cells versus SIRP
on astrocytomas reflects differences in glycosylation. A similar reduced glycosylation of SIRP
expressed in the rat brain has been noted by others (23)
.
Astrocytoma Cell Lines Express Transcripts for SIRP
1 as Assessed by PCR.
The initial characterization of SIRP
by Kharitonenkov et al. (4)
revealed a family of proteins that differ primarily in the first immunoglobulin (V) domain (3)
, as well as several forms due to alternative splicing (11
, 52)
. To establish the identity of the SIRP
protein expressed on astrocytoma cell lines, PCR primers were designed based on published sequences of SIRP
receptors and used to clone the expressed gene from both the SF126 and U373MG cell lines. These primer sequences are common to each of the three best-characterized subtypes of SIRP
(SIRP
1, SIRP
2, and SIRP
3). The predominant sequences obtained from the SF126 and U373MG cell lines were identical to the published SIRP
1 sequence in the extracellular domain (4)
, and are represented by the sequence U373-1 in Fig. 3
. Also shown in Fig. 3
are the sequences of three other clones obtained from the U373MG cell line, aligned to the published sequences of SIRP
1 and SIRP
2. A single clone, obtained from the U373MG cell line, is identical to the SIRP
2 sequence in the V domain (sequence U373-4 in Fig. 3
). We have also detected transcripts that correspond to the previously described splice variant of SIRP
1 missing the second and third immunoglobulin domains (shown as U373-2), and we have also detected transcripts containing previously undescribed splice variants (shown as U373-3 and U373-4). These latter sequences are similar to U373-2 in that the extracellular sequences contain only the V domain, but they differ in that they are missing the transmembrane domain and variable amounts of the intracellular tail. Thus, PCR amplification of SIRP transcripts from astrocytoma cell lines detected primarily SIRP
1, including full-length and alternatively spliced transcripts. One transcript from U373MG cells, however, was SIRP
2.
|
by Northern Blotting.
1 is expressed in both SF126 and U373MG astrocytoma cells, we next examined expression of SIRP
transcripts on all cell lines by Northern blotting. We used a probe derived from the 3'-untranslated region of the SIRP
1 gene, which is retained in both the full-length and alternatively spliced forms but is not present in SIRPß. The results, shown in Fig. 4
described previously (11
, 52)
. The mature mRNA encoding the single-immunoglobulin domain splice variant would be predicted to be approximately 650 bp shorter than the full-length mRNA. Despite overexposure of several Northern blots, no bands corresponding to this predicted splice variant were consistently detected (data not shown). Therefore, although the single immunoglobulin domain splice variant was detectable by PCR, it is likely a low abundance transcript compared with the full-length mRNA.
|
transcripts as assessed by Northern blotting, despite quite variable cell surface expression as determined by flow cytometry (see Fig. 1
expressed no detectable SIRP
on its cell surface (SF295), whereas cell lines with modest levels of mRNA for SIRP
expressed high levels of SIRP
on the cell surface (SF210 and SF268). Nonetheless, U373MG cells had both the most abundant transcripts (as assayed by Northern blotting) and the highest levels of SIRP expression (as assessed by flow cytometry). These findings suggest that SIRP
protein expression is regulated in part at the posttranscriptional level. Alternatively, posttranslational modification of SIRP
1 may produce isoforms that are not recognized by our antibody.
SIRP
1 on Astrocytoma Cell Lines Binds to CD47.
To begin characterizing the functional significance of SIRP
1 expression on astrocytoma cell lines, we next examined the binding of SIRP
1 on astrocytoma cell lines to its known ligand, CD47. Prior studies with rodent and human cells have shown that SIRP
fusion proteins bind CD47 (10
, 16
, 18
, 42)
. Similarly, a CD47 fusion protein (CD47Fc) is capable of binding to SIRP
expressed on L cells (20)
. In these studies, we examined binding by the CD47Fc fusion protein in the presence of an antibody to CD47 (2D3) that does not block binding of CD47Fc to SIRP
1 but, instead, enhances it. Enhanced binding is not due simply to multimerization of CD47 because enhancement is also seen with Fab fragments of 2D3 antibodies.6
In control studies, CD47Fc bound readily to CHO-SIRP
but not to untransfected CHO cells or to CHO-SIRPß1 (Fig. 5A
, top row, left three panels).
|
bound to CD47Fc. Binding to most astrocytoma cells was only detectable in the presence of the enhancing antibody 2D3, with the exception of the U373MG cell line, which expressed the highest level of SIRP
(see Fig. 1
expressed on these astrocytoma cell lines is capable of binding CD47, despite underglycosylation compared with SIRP
expressed on CHO cells. These results also indicate that our mAb to SIRP
1 detects all forms of SIRP
1 that are capable of binding CD47.
Phosphorylation of SIRP
on Astrocytoma Cell Lines Leads to Its Association with SHP-2.
Phosphorylation of the ITIM motifs in the SIRP
cytoplasmic domain mediates the recruitment of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 (3
, 4) . To establish whether this association also occurs in astrocytoma cell lines that express SIRP
1, two lines (SF126 and U373MG) were incubated in pervanadate to nonspecifically block phosphatase activity and thus enhance protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Cell lysates were then subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-SHP-2 antibody and then assayed by Western blotting with the 6.1 anti-SIRP antibody. As shown in Fig. 6
, SIRP
is coimmunoprecipitated with SHP-2 when, and only when, cells are stimulated with sodium orthovanadate. Thus, on phosphorylation, SIRP
is capable of recruiting SHP-2 in astrocytoma cells.
|
Is Phosphorylated in Astrocytoma Cell Lines in Response to Interaction with CD47.
can be activated in the astrocytoma cell lines, we examined the effect of cell adhesion on the phosphorylation of SIRP
. For these studies, astrocytoma cell lines were grown under serum-free conditions to prevent serum stimulation of SIRP
phosphorylation, after which SIRP
was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and examined for phosphotyrosine by Western blotting. In hematopoietic cells and transfected cell lines, SIRP
is phosphorylated on adhesion to various extracellular matrix proteins, including vitronectin, laminin, and fibronectin (3
, 26
, 27)
. Therefore, we examined cells grown in either the absence or presence of extracellular matrix. By observation, under serum-free conditions, astrocytoma cell lines incubated in uncoated plates did not adhere well to the plates but rather tended to aggregate with each other, whereas cell lines incubated on vitronectin-coated plates adhered with normal morphology (data not shown). Because all of the cell lines express CD47, the ligand for SIRP
, cell aggregation could potentially be due to an interaction between CD47 and SIRP
. However, this was evidently not the only factor mediating astrocytoma aggregation because cell lines without detectable SIRP
expression also adhered to each other, and addition of blocking antibodies to either CD47 or SIRP
did not block this aggregation (data not shown).
Having observed the morphological effects of cell adhesion either to an extracellular matrix protein or to each other, we studied the effects of this adhesion on SIRP
phosphorylation by anti-phosphotyrosine Western blotting. SF126 or U373MG cell suspensions were prepared in serum-free media and incubated either on uncoated plates or vitronectin-coated plates, with either an excess of an anti-CD47 antibody that blocked its interaction with SIRP
(B6H12), a nonblocking anti-CD47 antibody (2D3), or an isotype control antibody. Cell viability or the extent of aggregation was unaffected by the addition of either blocking antibody (data not shown). SIRP
was heavily phosphorylated on cell aggregation, and this phosphorylation was inhibited when the SIRP
-CD47 interaction was blocked by B6H12 (Fig. 7)
. Phosphorylation of SIRP
was similarly blocked by the 6.1 anti-SIRP antibody (data not shown). Although CD47 is a known ligand for SIRP
, this is the first demonstration that CD47 induces phosphorylation of SIRP
. These results indicate that the phosphorylation of SIRP
requires an interaction with CD47; simple aggregation of cells is insufficient to cause SIRP
phosphorylation if the SIRP
-CD47 interaction is blocked. We also observed that simple adhesion to an extracellular matrix, in this case vitronectin, was insufficient to cause phosphorylation of SIRP
when the SIRP
-CD47 interaction is blocked.
|
is known to be expressed in the developing nervous system, in adult animals it is only expressed in limited regions of the central nervous system (11
, 12
, 14)
. Having established the expression of SIRPs on astrocytoma cell lines, we next examined the expression of SIRPs on samples from brain biopsies performed on patients with grade 4 astrocytomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed on frozen specimens because the 6.1 anti-SIRP antibody did not react with formalin-fixed, or paraffin-embedded samples. All specimens were verified to be from high-grade astrocytomas by WHO definitions (53)
. Slides were read in a blinded fashion by a neuropathologist (E. J. H.) who graded the degree of staining on an arbitrary scale from 0 to 4, and estimated the percentage of cells staining positive. Representative immunohistochemical sections are shown in Fig. 8
|
|
ligand CD47. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on both astrocytoma cell lines and brain tumor biopsies. The majority of cell lines and tumors express SIRP
, although levels of expression vary considerably. As assessed by studies of tumor cell lines, most, if not all, of the SIRP
expressed on astrocytomas is identical in sequence to SIRP
1 (3
, 4)
. Furthermore, Northern blotting demonstrates the characteristic pattern for SIRP
1 in all cell lines that are positive for SIRP
expression, although transcripts are also expressed in cell lines without detectable SIRP
1 on the cell surface. Second, we have shown that SIRP
in these astrocytoma cell lines is functional in that it can bind its ligand CD47, is phosphorylated in a CD47-dependent manner, and associates with SHP-2 on phosphorylation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that SIRP
is expressed on astrocytoma cell lines or on primary brain tumors.
Proximal signaling events in SIRP
activation include phosphorylation on tyrosine residues on ITIMs. This phosphorylation can be induced by several stimuli, although to our knowledge phosphorylation of SIRP
by CD47 fusion proteins has not been directly examined (7
, 20
, 21
, 54)
. Our studies indicate that SIRP
phosphorylation can be induced by interaction with CD47, and adhesion to vitronectin is insufficient to induce SIRP
phosphorylation without the recognition of CD47. We were unable to demonstrate SIRP
phosphorylation with our CD47Fc fusion protein (data not shown). Similarly, we were unable to observe SIRP
phosphorylation upon cross-linking with our 6.1 mAb, which instead blocked SIRP
phosphorylation in our aggregation assay (data not shown). Thus, the requirements for phosphorylation of SIRP
appear to extend beyond mere cross-linking of SIRP
but are met when astrocytoma cells expressing both SIRP
and CD47 aggregate.
Several reports suggest that cell-cell adhesion can be entirely mediated by a SIRP
-CD47 interaction (10
, 17
, 42)
; however, adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells is not dependent on the SIRP
-CD47 interaction (37)
. In our studies, homotypic adhesion of astrocytoma cell lines to each other was not affected by the SIRP
-CD47 interaction because aggregation was unaffected by blocking the SIRP
-CD47 interaction, and cell lines aggregated to the same extent regardless of their expression of SIRP
(data not shown). Therefore, SIRP
phosphorylation on astrocytoma cell lines is not dependent on cell aggregation per se but only on the interaction of SIRP
and CD47.
Our findings may be important with regard to several aspects of astrocytoma behavior. SIRP
is known to be involved in cytoskeletal reorganization and cell motility in transfected cells (27
, 38) as well as neurite outgrowth (13
, 14
, 41)
. In addition, multiple reports have established an important role for SIRP
in the migration and adhesion of macrophages to various substrates (10
, 37
, 42
, 55)
as well as in neutrophil chemotaxis (21
, 28) . Astrocytomas are characterized by extensive infiltration and a striking ability to metastasize locally, processes that are known to be integrin-dependent (reviewed in Refs. 56
and 57
). Thus, the presence of SIRP
might influence the ability of tumor cells to migrate and invade the central nervous system. Indeed, prior studies have reported that transfection of SIRP
into the glioblastoma cell line U87MG results in defective cell spreading and migration (40)
. However, it is likely that SIRP
affects cell motility and adhesion in complex and dynamic ways. For example, fibroblasts derived from mice homozygous for expression of a mutant SIRP
, missing most of the cytoplasmic tail, exhibit accelerated initial adhesion to fibronectin but defective subsequent polarized extension and migration (38)
. In addition, the role of SIRP
in the regulation of cell biology may be different between transfected cells and cells that express SIRP
endogenously. We have thus far not observed any clear correlations between growth characteristics of astrocytoma cell lines and SIRP
expression, and no consistent differences in morphology are evident between cell lines that express SIRP
and those that do not. Studies on these cell lines are currently under way to examine the effect of endogenous SIRP
expression on more subtle tumor characteristics, such as cytoskeletal reorganization, cell motility, and adhesion.
SIRP
may also affect the response of astrocytomas to mitogenic growth signals. Most reports have shown that expression of SIRP
inhibits signaling through growth factor receptors, including those with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity [EGF receptor (4
, 33)
, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (4)
, and insulin receptor (31)
], receptors that recruit cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases [growth hormone receptor (29
, 30
, 58)
and IgE Fc receptor (59)
], and G protein-coupled receptors [lysophosphatidic acid receptor (36)
]. However, one group has shown that SIRP
enhances MAPK phosphorylation through the insulin receptor in NIH3T3 or Rat1 cells (32)
. Other groups have shown no effect of SIRP
expression on specific aspects of the MAPK signaling cascade, such as EGF-induced MAPK phosphorylation (40)
, lysophosphatidic acid stimulation of MAPK (36)
, or fibronectin-mediated phosphorylation of MAPK (26)
. These experiments all examined cells overexpressing wild-type SIRP
or mutant SIRP
, which could potentially complicate interpretation. We are initiating experiments to examine these effects in astrocytoma lines.
It was important for us to verify the identity of the SIRP expressed on these cell lines because isoforms of SIRP
have been described, and they differ predominantly in the membrane-distal immunoglobulin (V) domain (4)
. Sequencing of the human genome has thus far revealed only two genes for SIRP
receptors. The first is encoded by eight exons on chromosome 20p13, telomeric to genes for SIRPß receptors (25
, 60)
. An orthologous gene is encoded on mouse chromosome 2 (61)
. It appears likely that at least two cDNA variants for SIRP
(SIRP
1 and SIRP
2) are alleles of this locus. These two genes vary almost exclusively in their first immunoglobulin-like domain. The sequence in the NCBI database encodes the SIRP
2 sequence, and there is no other gene or alternate exon in the NCBI database that encodes SIRP
1.7
There is, however, a second SIRP
gene on chromosome 22, which is encoded as a single exon.7
The open reading frame of this gene is uninterrupted by stop codons, and it appears to encode the SIRP
3 cDNA. In the two cell lines that we examined in detail (SF126 and U373MG), all but one of the sequences recovered by PCR has matched SIRP
1. Only one PCR clone matched SIRP
2, and in no cases have we identified expression of SIRP
3.
Prior groups have reported alternately spliced forms of SIRP
resulting in a single extracellular immunoglobulin V domain (11
, 25)
. In the present study, most cDNAs cloned by PCR included all immunoglobulin domains, but sequences corresponding to the single immunoglobulin domain splice variant were also detected. Northern blotting, however, showed this variant to be a low abundance transcript. These results are similar to those of Comu et al. (11)
, who described several minor bands that may correspond to alternatively spliced SIRP
transcripts in mouse brain total RNA. Characterization of the murine SIRP
locus has revealed several other potential splice variants as detected by blotting or direct sequencing (11
, 25
, 52)
. In our analysis, these alternative forms were not seen, although other potential novel splice variants were detected at low frequency. These truncated sequences are likely splice variants because the deleted regions correspond exactly to the predicted exonic structure of SIRP
(25)
, and all sequences are in-frame gene products. The products of the splice variants are not abundant by Northern blotting, but additional studies may reveal that they have functional significance.
In analyzing the expression of SIRP
transcripts on astrocytoma cell lines by Northern blotting, we discovered that eight of nine cell lines expressed mRNA for SIRP
, although only five of these expressed detectable levels of cell surface protein by flow cytometry. We have not detected intracellular SIRP
protein by Western blotting in cells that do not express surface SIRP
(data not shown). Thus, regulation of SIRP
expression probably involves not only transcriptional but also posttranscriptional events. Alternatively, some cell lines may express SIRP
mRNA with mutations that render the SIRP
protein nonreactive to our mAb, or posttranslational modifications of SIRP
may render a gene product not detectable by our 6.1 mAb. This latter possibility seems unlikely because our 6.1 mAb recognizes deglycosylated SIRP
protein (Fig. 2)
, which implies that it recognizes an epitope on the core polypeptide. Also, we have shown that the degree of SIRP
surface expression, as assayed by the 6.1 mAb, corresponds to the degree of binding to the CD47Fc fusion protein (Fig. 5)
. Interestingly, Machida et al. (45)
have reported that transfection of 3T3 fibroblasts with v-src inhibits SIRP
expression at the transcriptional level, and a recent abstract (62)
finds that interfering with the EGF receptor signaling pathway in U87MG or U373MG cells by transfection of a dominant negative EGF receptor mutant can up-regulate SIRP
mRNA levels. We are unaware of any other reports that specifically examine regulation of SIRP
expression at the transcriptional level, although some reports hypothesize that expansion of CCA trinucleotide repeats found in the 3'-untranslated region of the SIRP
gene may be responsible for altered expression in disease states (52
, 60)
. Nevertheless, the caveat remains that mRNA levels may not directly correlate with SIRP
cell surface expression. This may have consequences in experiments using quantitative PCR or cDNA microarrays to examine differential gene expression of SIRP
.
In our attempts to identify the SIRPs expressed on astrocytoma cell lines, we discovered that, although the primary DNA sequence was identical to SIRP
1, the apparent molecular weight of the SIRP
1 protein was slightly less than that of SIRP
1 expressed in CHO cells, due to differences in glycosylation. Reduced glycosylation of SIRP
in neuronal cells has been noted previously in rodent tissues (8
, 23
, 63)
, although its functional significance is unknown. In one report, a nonglycosylated SIRP
1-gluathione S-transferase fusion protein produced in bacteria was capable of inhibiting SIRP
1-mediated macrophage fusion, implying that at least one activity of SIRP
1 is not dependent on glycosylation (24)
. In contrast, the binding affinity of a SIRP
1-Fc fusion protein to tissue sections was changed when the fusion protein was produced in cells deficient in galactosylation (23)
, arguing that SIRP
1 binding to CD47 is altered on undergalactosylation. In our studies, SIRP
1 expressed by astrocytoma cell lines demonstrated this reduced glycosylation, yet it was still capable of binding to a CD47Fc fusion protein. Detection of binding required coincubation with the 2D3 antibody against CD47, which increases the avidity of the CD47-SIRP
interaction.7
CD47 has several isoforms that are differentially expressed in various tissues (64)
, and this diversity may contribute to the variable binding by CD47 to SIRP
that has been observed by others (17
, 23)
. In addition, a SIRP
1 fusion protein binds to CD47 on resting CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, but binding decreases on stimulation of the T cells with concanavalinA, despite equivalent expression of CD47 on the T cells (65)
. Thus, the affinity of the CD47-SIRP
interaction may vary depending on the biological context and may not simply reflect expression of the molecules per se. It is interesting to consider the possibility that SIRP
1 expressed on astrocytomas may interact with CD47 on T cells, altering the immune response to these tumors.
Although SIRP
1 is expressed on astrocytomas and other tumors, its role in oncogenesis is unknown. Our results show that SIRP
is expressed in malignant astrocytes, whereas mouse studies have shown that normal astrocytes do not express SIRP
(7)
. Our studies demonstrate that levels of SIRP
expression vary considerably in different tumors. It will be of interest to test the correlation between SIRP
expression and outcomes in patients with astrocytomas. Furthermore, the ability of SIRP
to modulate multiple pathways critical to the malignant behavior of tumors may offer new targets for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of malignancies in general and malignant astrocytomas in particular.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
1 and SIRPß1, Mary Nakamura and Erene Niemi for developing the 6.1 mAb and demonstrating its binding to astrocytomas, Bob Rebres for assistance with the CD47Fc binding assays, and Dolores Dougherty from the UCSF Neurosurgery Tissue Bank for assistance obtaining brain tumor biopsy specimens. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Thomas T. Chen, Department of Arthritis/Immunology, San Francisco VA Hospital, 4150 Clement Street (111R), San Francisco, California 94121. Phone: (415) 750-2104; Fax: (415) 750-6920; E-mail: thochen{at}itsa.ucsf.edu
6 E. J. Brown, unpublished results. ![]()
7 T. Chen and W. Seaman, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received 12/ 9/02. Revised 10/ 2/03. Accepted 11/ 4/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/SHPS-1/BIT. J. Neurochem., 86: 55-60, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
1. Eur. J. Immunol., 30: 2130-2137, 2000.[Medline]
(SIRP
) but not SIRPß is involved in T-cell activation, binds to CD47 with high affinity, and is expressed on immature CD34(+)CD38(-) hematopoietic cells. Blood, 97: 2741-2749, 2001.
: down-regulation of IL-12 responsiveness and inhibition of dendritic cell activation. J. Immunol., 167: 2547-2554, 2001.
), a cellular ligand for CD47, regulates neutrophil transmigration. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 10028-10036, 2002.
determines its cellular binding-specificity. J. Cell Sci., 114: 1321-1329, 2001.[Abstract]
. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 28222-28229, 2000.
-CD47 interactions are required for the transmigration of monocytes across cerebral endothelium. J. Immunol., 168: 5832-5839, 2002.
(SIRP
) in hepatocellular carcinoma [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi, 20: 345-347, 1998.
and hepatocellular carcinoma [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi, 79: 268-270, 1999.
) regulates T cell function in the absence of exogenous danger signals, via a TNF
-dependent pathway. Eur. J. Immunol., 32: 1865-1872, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
receptor in human glioblastomas. 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, 726 AACR San Francisco, CA 2002.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Wang, Y. Li, X. Zhu, Y. Wang, F. Diao, and J. Lu Signal regulatory protein {alpha}1 is involved in the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoid receptor on the proliferation of murine macrophage RAW264.7 cell and mouse peritoneal macrophage J. Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 41(5): 393 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Subramanian, R. Parthasarathy, S. Sen, E. T. Boder, and D. E. Discher Species- and cell type-specific interactions between CD47 and human SIRP{alpha} Blood, March 15, 2006; 107(6): 2548 - 2556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Rohn, A. Reitz, A. Paschen, X. D. Nguyen, D. Schadendorf, A. B. Vogt, and H. Kropshofer A Novel Strategy for the Discovery of MHC Class II-Restricted Tumor Antigens: Identification of a Melanotransferrin Helper T-Cell Epitope Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 10068 - 10078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, I. Soto, Q. Tong, A. Chin, H.-J. Buhring, T. Wu, K. Zen, and C. A. Parkos SIRP{beta}1 Is Expressed as a Disulfide-linked Homodimer in Leukocytes and Positively Regulates Neutrophil Transepithelial Migration J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36132 - 36140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bredel, C. Bredel, D. Juric, G. R. Harsh, H. Vogel, L. D. Recht, and B. I. Sikic Functional Network Analysis Reveals Extended Gliomagenesis Pathway Maps and Three Novel MYC-Interacting Genes in Human Gliomas Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 8679 - 8689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |