| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
1 Molecular and Cellular Biology Research, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 3 ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, New York
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The low toxicity profile of LDM chemotherapy coincides with an apparent selectivity for "activated" endothelial cells of the tumors growing neovasculature (8 , 9) . Several in vitro studies have shown that endothelial cells are much more sensitive, sometimes by one or more orders of magnitude, to exposure of low concentrations of different cytotoxic drugs when compared with many tumor cell lines, fibroblasts of various origin, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, astrocytes, and mammary and prostate epithelial cells (10, 11, 12 , unpublished observations). However, no data are yet available regarding the comparative sensitivity of the target cell populations that are normally most sensitive to MTD chemotherapy (i.e., bone marrow progenitors, gut mucosa, and hair follicle cells). Moreover, a thorough preclinical toxicity analysis of LDM therapy beyond the documentation of changes in body weight as a surrogate marker for toxicity is not available despite the fact that LDM chemotherapy is rapidly entering the clinical trial arena (13, 14, 15, 16, 17) .
Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to study the effects of cyclophosphamide (CTX), clinically the most advanced drug in the setting of LDM chemotherapy, on bone marrow function and intestinal mucosa (13, 14, 15) . Given a similar toxicity pattern for successive therapy cycles of MTD CTX, the observation period for MTD experiments was 3 weeks (corresponding to one treatment cycle). In the case of LDM CTX, the observation period spanned 42 days for hematologic and intestinal parameters. This period was chosen based on the finding that PC-3 xenograft growth could be controlled completely for at least 42 days with LDM CTX (18) . We also studied the potential impact of LDM CTX on wound healing, an angiogenesis-dependent process, and morphologic and/or functional alterations of various organs (in particular, the bladder) in animals exposed to LDM CTX for more prolonged periods. The experiments comparing the effects of LDM versus MTD CTX were performed in non-tumor-bearing C.B-17 severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) and BALB/cJ mice (immunodeficient and immunocompetent mouse strains, respectively, often used for tumor experiments) because the presence of a tumor is known to influence bone marrow function, and treated and control animals also would necessarily have different tumor sizes, making interpretation of the obtained data extremely difficult (19) . Our results show an unambiguous advantage with respect to reduced toxicity when the LDM CTX regimen, known to be significantly efficacious in several different preclinical tumor models, is used.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CTX Treatment Regimens
LDM Schedule.
Mice were housed five per cage and given 200 ml water, which was changed twice per week. To achieve as close as possible a dose of 20 mg/kg/day of CTX, a volume of 1.33 ml of the CTX stock solution was added to 200 ml water. Control mice were given an equivalent volume of normal saline, the only nonmedicinal ingredient in the CTX powder (18)
.
Standard Therapy (MTD).
BALB/cJ mice were given 150 mg/kg CTX i.p. every other day for a total of three doses (6)
. C.B-17 SCID mice were administered 150 mg/kg CTX i.p. on day 0 and 100 mg/kg on days 2 and 4, respectively (18)
. The reduced total amount of CTX tolerated by C.B-17 SCID mice is explained by the defect defining the SCID phenotype, a mutation in the gene coding for the DNA-PKcs implicated in the repair of DNA damage, which renders such mice more susceptible to DNA-damaging agents (20)
.
Mice
Female BALB/cJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME); male C.B-17 SCID mice were from Charles River Canada (St. Constant, Quebec, Canada); and NIH Swiss nude male mice were from Taconic (German Town, NY). All of the experiments were started with 68-week-old adult mice, all sex and age matched, and performed with three animals per group unless otherwise indicated. All of the procedures were done in accordance with institutional and national guidelines.
Matrigel Plug Perfusion Assay
The Matrigel plug perfusion assay was performed as described previously, with minor modifications (21)
. Briefly, 0.5 ml Matrigel (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA) supplemented with 500 ng/ml of basic fibroblast growth factor (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) were injected s.c. on day 0 into both flanks of three female BALB/cJ mice per group. As a negative control, three mice were injected with Matrigel alone. Mice undergoing treatment, which was initiated on day 4, received normal saline p.o. and i.p. (positive control), normal saline p.o. and CTX i.p. (3 x 150 mg/kg every other day), CTX 20 mg/kg/day p.o. and saline i.p., and DC101 2 x 800 µg/mouse i.p. on days 4 and 7 as a positive treatment control. At day 10, all of the mice were injected i.v. with 0.2 ml of 25 mg/ml FITC-dextran (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Plasma samples were collected, and Matrigel plugs were removed and incubated at 37°C overnight with Dispase (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA) and homogenized. Fluorescence readings were obtained using an FL600 Fluorescence Plate Reader (Biotech Instruments, Winooski, VT), and angiogenic response was expressed as the ratio of Matrigel plug fluorescence/plasma fluorescence. The ratio of the positive control minus background (= negative control) was set as 100%.
Wound Healing Assay
A circular full-thickness skin wound, including the panniculus carnosus, was created under isoflurane anesthesia on the shaved back of female BALB/cJ mice. Wounds were neither dressed nor sutured. Mice were initially housed individually in sterile microisolator cages with surgical pads to prevent infection and irritation. After retraction of the wound edges 24 h later, the wound area was measured daily by means of Vernier calipers comparing mice receiving an oral regimen of 20 mg/kg/day CTX versus normal saline (n = 5 per group). The wound area was calculated as follows:
width x
length x
.
Differential Blood Counts
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and bled by cardiac puncture. The blood samples were collected in Vacutainer K2EDTA tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). An aliquot was removed, diluted in 3% acetic acid, and the total WBC count (WBC) determined using a hemocytometer. Blood smears were prepared by the wedge slide technique, fixed with 95% methanol, and stained using the Wright-Giemsa method. For the differential blood counts, 200 cells/blood smear (in case of severe leukopenia, 100 cells/blood smear) were analyzed.
Ex Vivo Bone Marrow Proliferation Assay
After removing both femur bones, the distal end was trimmed, and the bone marrow was flushed from the other side with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Corp., Burlington, Ontario, Canada) with a 23-gauge needle. After the cells were washed twice and the nucleated cell count determined as outlined previously, 105 cells/well were seeded into 96-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson) and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 1 h. Thereafter, cells were pulsed for 4 h with 2 µCi/well of methyl-[3H]-thymidine (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and frozen and stored at 20°C until further analysis. After thawing and harvesting, UniFilter GF/C plates (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA) were read in a TopCount NXT microplate scintillation counter (Packard, Meriden, CT). All of the experiments were performed with eight replicates per mouse.
Colony-Forming Unit Granulocyte/Granulocyte-Monocyte Assay
Nucleated bone marrow cells were prepared, counted as outlined previously, and resuspended in Iscoves modified Dulbeccos medium (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum. A total of 15 x 103 nucleated cells/ml of Methocult GF M3534 medium (Stemcell Technologies), which supports the growth of colony-forming units granulocyte (CFU-G), colony-forming units monocyte (CFU-M), and colony-forming units granulocyte-monocyte (CFU-GM), were dispensed in six-well plates (Becton Dickinson) and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 7 days, after which colonies were counted. Experiments were performed in duplicate.
Urinalysis
Urine was collected as described previously (18)
. Briefly, single mice involved in ongoing treatment experiments were placed in a "metabolic" cage lined with 96-well plates for 2 h, after which the urine was collected and stored at 70°C before analysis. Urinalysis was performed with Chemistrip 10 reagent strips (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada) following the manufacturers protocol.
H&E and Ki-67 Staining
Organs were removed, fixed overnight in phosphate-buffered formalin 10%, and transferred to ethanol 70% before embedding in paraffin. Femur specimens were decalcified in EDTA 15% (pH 8.0) for 5 days before additional processing. H&E staining was performed using standard procedures. For immunohistochemistry of small intestine specimens, paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene and gradually rehydrated. Antigen was retrieved by boiling the samples in 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5) for 20 min and was detected using the Histostain-SP rabbit kit following the manufacturers instructions (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA). The primary antibody, NCL-Ki67p, which recognizes proliferating cells, was applied for 3 h at room temperature (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastle, UK; Ref. 22
). Fifty epithelial cells from the lowest point of the crypt in the direction of the tip of the villus were analyzed for Ki-67 positivity (six crypts/mouse), and the results were expressed as proliferation index (percentage of Ki-67-positive cells).
Statistical Analysis
Results are reported as mean ± SD or SE. Statistical significance of differences was assessed by ANOVA, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (as indicated) using PRISM software (version 4.00; GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Together, MTD CTX produces an initial depression of bone marrow function, followed by a rebound as expected. However, bone marrow toxicity of LDM CTX is only minor and transient. The differences seen between the two mouse strains analyzed is most probably explained by C.B-17 SCID mice harboring a mutation in the gene coding for the DNA-PKcs implicated in the repair of DNA damage, resulting in different repair kinetics of DNA double-strand breaks, the main type of DNA damage induced by CTX (20) .
Differential Peripheral Blood Counts Reveal Moderate, but Sustained, Lymphopenia in BALB/cJ Mice Treated with LDM CTX.
As shown previously with respect to bone marrow, MTD CTX is followed by a classical pattern of alterations in the peripheral WBC. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, and macrophage counts initially are massively reduced, followed by a rebound (Fig. 3, AC)
. Unlike MTD, LDM CTX affects WBC less dramatically. However (and different from neutrophils), the number of lymphocytes and monocytes remains below normal levels during the study period (Fig. 3, AC)
. In particular, we observe a sustained lymphopenia with values decreased by
40%. Because of the nature of the C.B-17 SCID phenotype, this type of analysis was not performed in this strain.
|
|
In addition, analysis of H&E-stained sections of heart, lung, liver, pancreas, skeletal muscle, bone marrow, and small and large bowel revealed no overt tissue toxicity (data not shown).
Weight Course as Surrogate Marker for Toxicity.
Weight often is used as a surrogate marker for treatment-related toxicity in preclinical tumor models. Similar to the hematologic phenomena described previously, MTD CTX leads to a transient weight loss that recovered until the end of the cycle (Fig. 5, A and B)
. Weight gain after MTD CTX is protracted in C.B-17 SCID mice compared with BALB/cJ mice. As opposed to MTD CTX, the administration of LDM CTX does not cause weight loss but leads to a certain delay in weight gain.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By various assays, we show here for the first time that toxic side effects of 20 mg/kg/day CTX given orally via the drinking water, an efficacious antiangiogenic and antitumor regimen, are minor and transient in nature with respect to bone marrow progenitor and intestinal epithelial cells, which are among the most sensitive cellular targets traditionally associated with the use of cytotoxic agents (18) . This result is seemingly consistent with previously reported in vitro studies showing a many-fold higher sensitivity of endothelial cells of various origins to different cytotoxic drugs when compared with a number of other cell types tested (10, 11, 12) . The basis for this endo thelial cell ultrasensitivity to LDM cytotoxic drug exposure is being unraveled. For example, Bocci et al. (8) showed that the specificity derives at least partially from the induction or up-regulation of thrombospondin-1, an endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor, by LDM CTX protocols. In addition to the antiangiogenic effects, LDM regimens also are capable of potent and sustained suppression of the mobilization from the bone marrow of endothelial cell progenitors, and therefore vasculogenesis, as opposed to MTD schedules, which initially suppress but then promote the mobilization of these precursors during long break periods (9) .
Using body weight changes as a surrogate marker for toxicity, various LDM regimens have been shown to be devoid of severe toxic side effects in preclinical models (18 , 21) . In the present study, we demonstrate the superior toxicity profile of LDM (20 mg/kg/day) as opposed to MTD CTX regarding hematologic and intestinal toxicity and weight gain. Moreover, a histologic analysis of several parenchymal organs reveals no tissue damage in tumor-bearing animals treated with LDM CTX for periods up to 81 days. In particular, we note the absence of bladder toxicity as shown morphologically and by urinalysis (to be discussed). In addition, the LDM CTX regimen used has no negative impact on wound healing, an angiogenesis-dependent process (29) . Of note, the total CTX dose administered in 3 weeks is similar in the MTD and LDM regimens (450 and 420 mg/kg, respectively).
Recently published clinical trials using metronomic dosing of CTX (13 , 14) and other alkylating agents such as trofosfamide (16) and treosulfan (17) confirm the excellent tolerance of such regimens. Colleoni et al. (13) described an LDM regimen of 50 mg/day CTX combined with methotrexate (2 x 2.5 mg/day twice per week) in mostly pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Concomitantly with an excellent overall response rate of 31.7%, mild hematologic side effects were observed, with side effects classified as >2 according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group criteria being rare (13) . Hepatic side effects most probably were related to the administration of methotrexate or the presence of liver metastases. However, Colleoni et al. applied strict dose-modification criteria when toxic side effects appeared, which might lead to an underestimation of the toxic potential. In the study by Glode et al. (14) , 34 prostate cancer patients, of whom 38% had been pretreated with cytotoxic drugs, were given orally 50 mg/day CTX combined with 1 mg/d dexamethasone. Hematotoxicity again was mild, and no unexpected side effects were observed (14) .
Unfortunately, the studies by Colleoni et al. and Glode et al. do not present data regarding lymphocyte counts and infectious complications. In light of our findings of sustained lymphopenia, the possibility of a certain immunosuppressive potential of LDM CTX cannot be discarded. This is not completely unexpected. First, besides its anti-neoplastic properties, CTX also is commonly used as an immunosuppressive drug e.g. for vasculitis syndromes, either as i.v. pulse or in daily doses of mostly 2 mg/kg/day. In this setting, oral CTX is superior in controlling the underlying disease compared with the cyclic administration, but it also is more toxic. In particular, infectious complications are more common (33) . Other side effects include hemorrhagic cystitis, gonadal dysfunction, mild to moderate hair loss, and occasional secondary neoplasias (34) . The daily dose of CTX used in the published LDM CTX trials was significantly <2 mg/kg/day, which might explain the seemingly lower incidence of infections and the absence of other complications mentioned previously that are common in patients receiving CTX for immunosuppressive purposes. Second, a recent publication shows that weekly administration of CTX according to the protocol outlined by Browder et al. (6) reduces the number of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in a C57BL/6 immunotherapy model, albeit at slower kinetics than MTD CTX. Interestingly, the low-dose protocol seems to spare memory-type lymphocytes (35) . At the moment, it is not known whether these findings also apply to the oral CTX protocol used in our studies. Twenty mg/kg/day of CTX have been shown to be the minimal effective dose in various preclinical tumor models.4 It remains to be seen whether this dose, and therefore the immunosuppressive potential, can be further reduced without sacrificing antiangiogenic efficacy by the combination of CTX with targeted antiangiogenic compounds. Alternatively, other groups of cytotoxic drugs with less immunosuppressive activity may be used in LDM regimens. Although low doses of CTX (and other cytotoxic agents) have been shown to have immunopotentiating properties, such an effect is not expected with additional decrease of the daily dose of CTX. In this regard, most of these immunopotentiating regimens of CTX use single, not repetitive, low doses of CTX (36) . Of note Hermans et al. (35) have demonstrated that under certain conditions LDM CTX protocols can be successfully combined with immunotherapy protocols despite their immunosuppressive side effects, such that the combined effects of LDM CTX and immunotherapy are superior to either monotherapy or MTD CTX with or without immunotherapy.
Preclinically, LDM regimens demonstrate their full potential when used in combination with other agents in a long-term fashion (6 , 21) . Such long-term combination treatments can be realized because of the low toxicity profile of LDM chemotherapeutic drug regimens and consequently the possibility of protracted administration. Therefore, LDM regimens present an ideal platform for combination treatments not only with antiangiogenic and antivascular compounds but perhaps also targeted agents with indirect antiangiogenic activities, such as the anti-ErbB2-blocking antibody Herceptin, which by their nature should be administered in a long-term fashion. Ironically, even radiotherapy and probably MTD chemotherapy may be meaningful combination partners for LDM regimens as long as the advantage of low toxicity is not significantly compromised (37 , 38) .
In summary, our results show a clear safety advantage for LDM chemotherapy using CTX when comparing the effects of this type of dosing regimen with conventional MTD chemotherapy regimens on rapidly turning-over tissues. Although a potential major advantage, especially when integrated with targeted antiangiogenic drugs, several challenges must be overcome to realize the full benefits of this therapeutic approach in the clinic, such as defining the optimal low dose and schedule for a given chemotherapeutic drug and dealing with the issue of patient compliance when oral drugs are used (39) .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Robert S. Kerbel, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre, Molecular and Cellular Biology, S-217, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5. Phone: 416-480-5711; Fax: 416-480-5884; E-mail: robert.kerbel{at}sw.ca
Received 2/18/04. Accepted 3/24/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Emmenegger, Y. Shaked, S. Man, G. Bocci, I. Spasojevic, G. Francia, A. Kouri, R. Coke, W. Cruz-Munoz, S. M. Ludeman, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of chronic low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide therapy in mice Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2280 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Suvannasankha, C. Fausel, B. E. Juliar, C. T. Yiannoutsos, W. B. Fisher, R. H. Ansari, L. L. Wood, G. G. Smith, L. D. Cripe, and R. Abonour Final Report of Toxicity and Efficacy of a Phase II Study of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Prednisone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Hoosier Oncology Group Trial, HEM01-21 Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bottini, D. Generali, M. P. Brizzi, S. B. Fox, A. Bersiga, S. Bonardi, G. Allevi, S. Aguggini, G. Bodini, M. Milani, et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Letrozole and Letrozole Plus Low-Dose Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide As Primary Systemic Treatment in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3623 - 3628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kerbel Antiangiogenic therapy: a universal chemosensitization strategy for cancer? Science, May 26, 2006; 312(5777): 1171 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Emmenegger, G. C. Morton, G. Francia, Y. Shaked, M. Franco, A. Weinerman, S. Man, and R. S. Kerbel Low-Dose Metronomic Daily Cyclophosphamide and Weekly Tirapazamine: A Well-Tolerated Combination Regimen with Enhanced Efficacy That Exploits Tumor Hypoxia Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1664 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. du Manoir, G. Francia, S. Man, M. Mossoba, J. A. Medin, A. Viloria-Petit, D. J. Hicklin, U. Emmenegger, and R. S. Kerbel Strategies for Delaying or Treating In vivo Acquired Resistance to Trastuzumab in Human Breast Cancer Xenografts Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 904 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Emmenegger and R. S. Kerbel A Dynamic De-Escalating Dosing Strategy to Determine the Optimal Biological Dose for Antiangiogenic Drugs Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7589 - 7592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shaked, U. Emmenegger, S. Man, D. Cervi, F. Bertolini, Y. Ben-David, and R. S. Kerbel Optimal biologic dose of metronomic chemotherapy regimens is associated with maximum antiangiogenic activity Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3058 - 3061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yap, D. Veliceasa, U. Emmenegger, R. S. Kerbel, L. M. McKay, J. Henkin, and O. V. Volpert Metronomic Low-Dose Chemotherapy Boosts CD95-Dependent Antiangiogenic Effect of the Thrombospondin Peptide ABT-510: A Complementation Antiangiogenic Strategy Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6678 - 6685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shaked, U. Emmenegger, G. Francia, L. Chen, C. R. Lee, S. Man, A. Paraghamian, Y. Ben-David, and R. S. Kerbel Low-dose Metronomic Combined with Intermittent Bolus-dose Cyclophosphamide Is an Effective Long-term Chemotherapy Treatment Strategy Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7045 - 7051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bocci, M. Tuccori, U. Emmenegger, V. Liguori, A. Falcone, R. S. Kerbel, and M. Del Tacca Cyclophosphamide-methotrexate 'metronomic' chemotherapy for the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer. A comparative pharmacoeconomic evaluation Ann. Onc., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 1243 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pietras and D. Hanahan A Multitargeted, Metronomic, and Maximum-Tolerated Dose "Chemo-Switch" Regimen is Antiangiogenic, Producing Objective Responses and Survival Benefit in a Mouse Model of Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2005; 23(5): 939 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics< |