Cancer Research SABCS  Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Taketo, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Taketo, M. M.
[Cancer Research 64, 4010-4017, June 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Immunology

Pivotal Role of CXCR3 in Melanoma Cell Metastasis to Lymph Nodes

Kenji Kawada1,3, Masahiro Sonoshita1, Hiromi Sakashita2, Arimichi Takabayashi4, Yoshio Yamaoka3, Toshiaki Manabe2, Kayo Inaba5, Nagahiro Minato6, Masanobu Oshima1 and Makoto Mark Taketo1

Departments of 1 Pharmacology, 2 Clinical Pathology, and 3 Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto; 4 Kitano Hospital Medical Institute, Osaka; and Departments of 5 Animal Development and Physiology, and 6 Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemokines and their receptors play key roles in leukocyte trafficking and are also implicated in cancer metastasis to specific organs. Here we show that mouse B16F10 melanoma cells constitutively express chemokine receptor CXCR3, and that its ligands CXCL9/Mig, CXCL10/IP-10, and CXCL11/I-TAC induce cellular responses in vitro, such as actin polymerization, migration, invasion, and cell survival. To determine whether CXCR3 could play a role in metastasis to lymph nodes (LNs), we constructed B16F10 cells with reduced CXCR3 expression by antisense RNA and investigated their metastatic activities after s.c. inoculations to syngeneic hosts, C57BL/6 mice. The metastatic frequency of these cells to LNs was markedly reduced to ~15% (P < 0.05) compared with the parental or empty vector-transduced cells. On the other hand, pretreatment of mice with complete Freund’s adjuvant increased the levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 in the draining LNs, which caused 2.5–3.0-fold increase (P < 0.05) in the metastatic frequency of B16F10 cells to the nodes with much larger foci. Importantly, such a stimulation of metastasis was largely suppressed when CXCR3 expression in B16F10 cells was reduced by antisense RNA or when mice were treated with specific antibodies against CXCL9 and CXCL10. We also demonstrate that CXCR3 is expressed on several human melanoma cell lines as well as primary human melanoma tissues (5 of 9 samples tested). These results suggest that CXCR3 inhibitors may be promising therapeutic agents for treatment of LN metastasis, including that of melanoma.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the earliest features of tumor cell dissemination in most human cancers, and ~60% of metastasis is found in regional LNs in malignant melanoma (1) . It has been proposed that lymphogenous and hematogenous metastases occur rather simultaneously, because lymphatic and lymphaticovenous shunts often bypass regional LNs and allow dissemination of malignant cells at an early stage (2) . Thus, metastasis of cancer cells to the regional LN appears to be a reflection of the biological aggressiveness of the primary tumors (3) , and its assessment is critical for predicting prognosis and setting up therapeutic strategies (4) .

Chemokines are structurally related, small-polypeptide signaling molecules that bind to and activate a family of G-protein-coupled receptors. Chemokines are divided into four families, CXC, CC, C, and CX3C, based on the positions of four conserved-cysteine residues. Important roles of chemokines and their receptors have been demonstrated in inflammation, infection, tissue injury, allergy, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as in malignant tumors (5) . The role of chemokines in malignant tumors appears complex. Whereas many chemokines show antitumor activity by stimulating immune cells or by inhibiting tumor neovascularization, other chemokines may promote tumor growth and metastasis by direct growth stimulation, enhancing cell motility, or angiogenesis (6) . Regarding the direct role of chemokines in tumor metastasis, recent reports suggested that chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR7 play significant roles in metastasis of melanoma, breast, and ovarian cancers to specific tissues (7, 8, 9) . In contrast, the role of CXCR3 in metastasis has not been elucidated, although it is expressed on some human cancer cells including melanoma and malignant B lymphocytes and mediates chemotaxis in these cancer cells (10 , 11) .

In this article, we demonstrate that CXCR3 plays a critical role in B16F10 melanoma cell metastasis to LNs, and that increased expression of CXCL9 and CXCL10 in the LNs by complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) treatment facilitates melanoma cell metastasis through CXCR3. These results suggest that CXCR3 can be a novel therapeutic target to suppress LN metastasis in some cancers that express it.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines, Reagents, and Tissue Samples.
B16F10 mouse melanoma cells and C32TG, G361, HMV-I and SK-Mel 28 human melanoma cells were obtained from Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan). Female C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from CLEA Japan (Osaka, Japan). Recombinant chemokines were from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Primary melanoma tissue samples were collected, with informed consent, from either diagnostic biopsies or upon surgery at Kyoto University Hospital and Kitano Hospital. Histopathological diagnosis was confirmed for each specimen.

Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) Analysis.
Total RNA from cultured cells was extracted using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacture’s protocol. Two µg of each RNA sample were reverse-transcribed and subjected to PCR under the following conditions: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, for 30 cycles. The primers for CXCR3 were 5'-GCCGGAGCACCAGCCAAGCCAT-3' and 5'-AGGTGGAGCAGGAAGGTGTC-3'; and for CCR10, 5'-CTGGAATCTAGGAAGTACCAC-3' and 5'-CCAAAAAGGCATAAAGCACCG-3'. The control RT-PCR for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was performed to normalize the sample amounts.

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence Microscopy.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with antimouse CXCR3 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or antihuman CXCR3 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) by the avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase method. In primary human melanoma tissues, microwave antigen retrieval was performed. For immunofluorescence staining of cytoskeletal F-actin, cells were incubated in 0.5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, treated with CXCL9 (100 ng/ml) for 5 min, fixed, and stained with rhodamine phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Frozen, OCT compound-embedded LNs were sectioned at 4 µm and stained with antibodies for either mouse CXCL9 (R&D Systems) or CXCL10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) simultaneously with CD11b (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA), followed by biotinylated antigoat secondary antibody and Fluorescein Avidin DCS (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or antirat Alexa594 antibody (Molecular Probes).

Chemotaxis and Chemoinvasion Assays.
Migration and invasion were assayed in 24-well Transwell cell culture chambers (8 µm-pore membranes; Coster, Cambridge, MA) as described (12) . Membranes were precoated with fibronectin (10–20 µg/ml) for chemotaxis or with Matrigel (30 mg/insert) for invasion studies. After B16F10 cells (5 x 104 or 2.5 x 105 cells/ml for chemotaxis or invasion studies) were added to the upper chamber and incubated for 6 h for chemotaxis, or 24 h for invasion studies, cells attached on the lower surface of the membrane were counted in at least five different fields (original magnification, x200). Chemotaxis and invasion indices were defined as the ratios of migrating cell numbers in the experimental groups divided by those in the controls. At least three experiments were performed for each set. Chemokinesis was tested in checkerboard assays and was negative for all of the chemokines. Proteins from normal and inflamed LNs were extracted in Tris-HCl with protease inhibitor as described (13) . For neutralizing studies, protein extracts were preincubated with various concentrations of anti-CXCL9, anti-CXCL11 (R&D Systems), anti-CXCL10, and anti-CCL21 (Peprotech) antibodies, respectively.

Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) and Paxillin.
B16F10 cells (4 x 106 cells) were incubated for 2 h without serum on collagen-coated 6-cm dishes, treated with CXCL9 (100 ng/ml), and lysed with 1 ml of lysis buffer [50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 1% NP40, 4 mM Na4P2O7, and protease inhibitors (pH 7.4)]. Each 0.45-ml lysate was precipitated with anti-FAK or anti-paxillin antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) using protein G-Sepharose. One half of the precipitate was blotted and analyzed using enhanced chemiluminescence phosphorylation detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), whereas the other half was with anti-FAK or antipaxillin antibody.

Cell Viability Assay.
B16F10 cells (1 x 106 cells) were incubated in triplicate for 48 h in serum-containing (0.1 and 10% FCS) or serum-free medium with or without CXCL9 (100 ng/ml). Viable cells were counted by the trypan blue dye exclusion method. At least three sets of experiments were performed for each set.

Generation of CXCR3 Antisense Transfectants.
A 544-bp segment at the 5' end of CXCR3 cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR, subcloned into TA cloning site of pCRII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and then inserted, as a BamHI/XbaI fragment, into pcDNA3.1/Hygro (Invitrogen) in the antisense orientation. The following primers were used: 5'-AAGCCATGTACCTTGAGGTTA -3' and 5'-CAGACAGAGACCCCATACAAQC -3'. The orientation of the subcloned gene was verified by restriction analysis with several enzymes and sequencing. With calcium phosphate precipitates, stable transfectants were selected with hygromycin B (200 µg/ml) for 3 weeks. CXCR3 protein was determined by Western blotting for 40 µg of cell lysate. For calcium mobilization assay, the relative fluorescence was monitored after addition of CXCL9 (300 ng/ml) in a Fluoroskan Ascent FL (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland), after preincubation with 20 µM Fluo-3 a.m. (Molecular Probes). For proliferation analysis, cells (1 x 105 cells) were incubated for 48 h in medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and counted in a hemocytometer.

Quantitative RT-PCR Analyses.
Total RNA from homogenized LNs was extracted using ISOGEN, treated with DNase I to eliminate possible genomic DNA contamination, and then reverse-transcribed. Thereafter, cDNA was amplified and measured using an ABI-7700 DNA Sequence Detector (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA). The following primers and probes were used: tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1), 5'-CCTAGCTCAGTTCTCTGGACATGA-3', 5'-TCGCAGGCCTCTAAGATACGA-3', and 5'-Fam-CTGCCTGGGCCACAGTTCACCTCTAATT-Tamra-3'; CXCL9, 5'-AGAACTCAGCTCTGCCATGAAGT-3', 5'-AACTCCACACTGCTCCAGGAA-3', and 5'-Fam-CGCTGTTCTTTTCCTTTTGGGCATCA-Tamra-3'; CXCL10, 5'-CCAGTGAGAATGAGGGCCATAGG-3', 5'-CTCAACACGTGGGCAGGAT-3', and 5'-Fam-AAGCTTGAAATCATCCCTGCGAGCC-Tamra-3'; CXCL11, 5'-CAGGAAGGTCACAGCCATAGC -3', 5'-CAAAGACAGCGCCCCTGTT-3', and 5'-Fam-CCACAGCTGCTCAAGGCTTCCTTATGTTC -Tamra-3'; and CCL21, 5'-CAAAGCAGCCACCTCATGCT -3', 5'-ATGGCCGTGCAGATGTAATG -3', and 5'-Fam-TCCACACCCTTGCCCTGCTTCAA -Tamra-3'. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA levels were used for normalization. Serial dilution studies demonstrated that the TRP-1 signal could be detected above background in the cDNA samples derived from as few as 50 melanoma cells mixed with 5 x 106 murine LN cells.

Flow Cytometry.
CXCR3 on melanoma cells was stained with antihuman CXCR3 antibody and analyzed in a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) as described (10) .

In Vivo Metastasis Studies.
For spontaneous metastasis experiments, B16F10 parental, EV1, AS1, and AS2 transfectant cells (5 x 105 cells in 30 µl of PBS) were injected into the right hind footpad at day 0. At day 7, right popliteal LNs were dissected and pooled for each group of 5 mice to quantify the tumor burden by quantitative RT-PCR as described (8) . Note that there is only one popliteal LN on each side in the mouse. At day 21, mice were euthanized and necropsied for gross metastasis in the right popliteal LNs. In the CFA-treated metastasis experiments, 30 µl of CFA or PBS were injected into the right ankle of C57BL/6 females at day –3. For neutralization studies, mice preinjected with CFA were injected with 1 µg each of goat anti-CXCL9 and anti-CXCL10 antibodies or 2 µg of control goat IgG in 20 µl of PBS into the popliteal region, daily for the next 7 days, followed by three times per week for 2 more weeks. All of the animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyoto University.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of Chemokine Receptors in Metastatic Mouse Melanoma Cell Lines.
Mouse melanoma cell line B16F10 provides a convenient transplantable model that is metastatic to LNs in the syngeneic host, C57BL/6 (14) . We first determined expression of various chemokine receptors (CCR1-CCR10, CXCR2-CXCR5, XCR1, and CX3CR1) in B16F10 cells by RT-PCR. Among them, only CXCR3 and CCR10 were expressed with no detectable mRNA for other chemokine receptors (Fig. 1A)Citation . Expression was not found for any ligands for CXCR3 (CXCL9, CXCL10, or CXCL11) or CCR10 (CCL27/ESkine/CTACK/ALP/ILC or CCL28/MEC; data not shown). We then confirmed expression of the CXCR3 protein by immunohistochemistry in transplanted tumors. B16F10 expressed CXCR3 at the primary inoculation site as well as in the metastatic foci of LNs and lungs (Fig. 1, B–G)Citation .



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Expression of chemokine receptor CXCR3. A, detection of mRNAs for chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR10 in B16F10 melanoma cells by reverse transcription-PCR. RNA from spleen was used as a positive control, whereas B16F10 mRNA without reverse transcription was a negative control. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as the internal control. B–G, expression of CXCR3 protein in B16F10 melanoma sections determined by immunohistochemistry (3 weeks postinoculation). B and C, a primary transplanted tumor. D and E, a metastatic lymph node. F and G, a metastatic lung nodule. B, D, and F, negative controls stained with the IgG isotype. Note that dark spots in the controls show melanin pigments produced by melanoma cells. C, E, and G, stained with antimouse CXCR3 antibody (Hematoxylin counterstaining). Scale bars, 100 µm.

 
Chemokine-Mediated Migration and Invasion.
In addition to CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, a CC chemokine CCL21/SLC can also bind to CXCR3 in mice although with a lower affinity (15) . To determine whether these chemokines could induce migration and invasion, we then performed in vitro assays (Fig. 2, A and B)Citation . Among them, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 caused directional migration and invasion of B16F10 cells in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, CCL21 did not induce either response even at 500 ng/ml. The strongest responses of B16F10 cells to these chemokines were obtained at concentrations similar to those for leukocytes (16) .



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Chemokine-mediated migration, invasion, actin cytoskeletal rearrangement, phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, and paxillin, and cell survival in vitro. A and B, chemotaxis and chemoinvasion assays. Chemotactic (A) and invasive (B) responses to various concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL21, respectively. Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01). C, fluorescence staining of actin cytoskeleton with phalloidin after incubation with or without CXCL9 (100 ng/ml) for 5 min. Representative photographs of diffusely stained (–CXCL9) and polarized (+CXCL9) cells are shown. D and E, Western analysis of the immunoprecipitates of B16F10 cells incubated with or without CXCL9 for the indicated time, with anti-FAK (D) or anti-paxillin antibody (E). F, cell viability assays. Viable cell rates (in percentages) cultured for 48 h in serum-containing (10% and 0.1% FCS) or serum-free medium with or without CXCL9 (100 ng/ml). Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01).

 
CXCL9-Induced Rearrangements of Actin Cytoskeleton, Focal Adhesions, and Cell Survival.
Binding of a chemokine to its receptor triggers intracellular actin polymerization, a prerequisite for cell motility and migration, in cultured leukocytes (17) . As expected, B16F10 cells also showed a polarized pattern of F-actin staining in higher proportions of cells when incubated with CXCL9, a ligand for CXCR3. Addition of CXCL9 at 100 ng/ml increased the proportion of F-actin polarized cells approximately twice (Fig. 2CCitation ; from 20.2 ± 3.0% to 38.4 ± 5.6%; P < 0.01). On the other hand, the diffusely stained cell population was reduced to about a half (from 45.7 ± 5.0% to 22.8 ± 1.9%; P < 0.01).

Many protein kinases, including FAK, and their substrates, such as paxillin, talin, and tensin, accumulate at focal adhesions organized by ß1-containing integrins (18) . Phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin is essential for the formation of focal adhesion complex (19) . As expected, CXCL9 induced phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin (Fig. 2, D and E)Citation . Their phosphorylation took place shortly after addition of CXCL9, lasted for ~10 min, and was reduced to the baseline level after 30 min. In human melanoma cell line BLM, CXCL9 up-regulates ß1 integrin-dependent cell adhesion to fibronectin (10) . Thus, it is conceivable that CXCL9 induces a rapid and transient up-regulation of ß1 integrin-mediated adhesion of B16F10 cells to the extracellular matrix in the LN.

In addition to induction of chemotaxis, activation of CXCR4 by its ligand CXCL12/SDF-1{alpha} stimulates cell growth and survival in some cell types (20 , 21) . Therefore, we analyzed the effect of CXCL9 on cell viability in B16F10 cells (Fig. 2F)Citation . CXCL9 did not show any effects on cell proliferation under either normal (10% FCS) or low (0.1% FCS) serum condition. Without serum, on the other hand, CXCL9 significantly enhanced cell survival compared with the untreated control (P < 0.05).

Construction and Analysis of B16F10 Transfectants with Reduced CXCR3 Expression.
To evaluate the role of CXCR3, we isolated B16F10 transfectant clonal cell lines in which expression of CXCR3 was reduced by an antisense RNA construct ("Materials and Methods"). Three antisense transfectants (AS1, AS2, and AS3) and two empty vector transfectants (EV1 and EV2) were established. The presence of antisense transcripts was verified by RT-PCR (data not shown). A Western blot analysis showed that the CXCR3 protein levels in the antisense clones were decreased to 20–25% of those in the parental or empty vector-transfected clones (Fig. 3A)Citation . To determine their responses to the CXCR3 ligands, we performed calcium mobilization and chemotaxis assays. Intracellular calcium flux is one of the earliest biochemical events that takes place in response to chemokines (22) . Addition of CXCL9 to B16F10 cells induced 15–20% increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Although the B16F10 transfectants with an empty vector showed similar increases in the Ca2+ concentration, those with the antisense construct showed only modest increases of ~5% (Fig. 3B)Citation . Consistent with the result, the CXCL9-induced migratory responses were virtually eliminated in the antisense-transfectant clones (Fig. 3C)Citation . To rule out possible effects of CXCR3 suppression on cell proliferation, we determined the growth rates of the parental and transfectant B16F10 clones, without significant difference among the clones (Fig. 3D)Citation .



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Characterization of B16F10 clones transfected with antisense-CXCR3. A, Western blot photographs of CXCR3 and ß-actin (top), and quantified data for CXCR3 (bottom). (Normalized with ß-actin.) Mean; bars, ±SD, n = 3 (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01 against B16F10 control). B, decreased calcium fluxes in antisense-transfected B16F10 clones upon exposure to CXCL9. Parental, empty vector-, and antisense-transfected B16F10 cells were loaded with Fluo-3 a.m., and exposed to CXCL9 (300 ng/ml). C, chemotactic responses to CXCL9 (100 ng/ml) in vitro. Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01). D, cell numbers after 48-h culture of 105 cells. Horizontal bars show the mean values from triplicate cultures.

 
Suppressed Metastasis of Antisense-CXCR3 Cells to LNs.
To assess the effect of CXCR3 on LN metastasis, we inoculated B16F10 melanoma cells into the hind footpads of syngeneic mice. One week later, we collected popliteal LNs and quantified the mRNA levels for TRP-1, a melanocyte-specific marker, by real-time RT-PCR. This assay gives a sensitive quantification of LN micrometastasis and has been used clinically to stage human melanoma (23) . In a week, the primary tumors in the footpads became grossly visible, and macroscopic metastasis was found in LN of some mice. Quantitatively, TRP-1 mRNA level from the mice inoculated with the antisense-transfectant clones (AS1 and AS2) was reduced to only 12.5%–25% of that with the empty vector-transfectant clones (EV1; P < 0.05), whereas that with the parental cells was essentially the same as with the EV1 clone (Fig. 4A)Citation . The expression levels of TRP-1 mRNA in cultured cells were virtually the same among the parental, empty vector- and antisense-transfectant clones (8–9 pg/ng cDNA).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Suppression of B16F10 metastasis to lymph node (LN) by inhibition of CXCR3 expression. Experimental schedules are shown above each set. A, quantification of melanoma tumor marker tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1) mRNA in LN by real-time reverse transcription-PCR 1 week after tumor inoculations. Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.05). Each circle represents a set of 5 mouse samples pooled. B, representative photographs of the popliteal LNs from mice 3 weeks after inoculations with B16F10, EV1, AS1, and AS2, respectively. Black metastatic foci are visible because B16F10 produces melanin pigments. Note that only one popliteal LN was found on each side. Scale in mm.

 
To evaluate the tumor metastasis in a later stage, we dissected popliteal LNs and examined metastatic foci 3 weeks after inoculations (Fig. 4B)Citation , when the primary tumors in the footpads reached ~1 cm in diameter. Although the parental and EV1 clones formed foci in 40% (10 of 25) of the LNs in total, the AS1- and AS2-transfected clones metastasized to only 6.3% (1 of 16) of LNs (Table 1Citation ; P < 0.05). In more detail, only 12.5% (1 of 8) and 0% (0 of 8) of the mice inoculated with AS1- and AS2-transfected clones, respectively, showed metastatic foci, whereas 37.5% (6 of 16) and 44.1% (4 of 9) of the mice formed foci with the parental and EV1-transfectant clones, respectively. Regarding the transplanted primary tumors, there was no significant difference in size among mice inoculated with the parental, empty vector- and antisense-transfectant clones (Table 1Citation ; Student’s t test). We also examined lung metastasis and found no significant difference among these clones. Protein extracts from the primary tumors were analyzed for CXCR3 expression by Western blotting to confirm that reduced CXCR3 expression was maintained in the antisense-transfectant clones in vivo (data not shown). These results demonstrate that expression of CXCR3 plays a pivotal role in B16F10 melanoma cell metastasis to the draining LNs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Metastasis frequency of B16F10 clones to LNsa

 
Enhanced Migration of B16F10 by CFA-induced CXCL9 and CXCL10.
Both CXCR3 ligands, CXCL9 and CXCL10, are expressed constitutively at high levels within lymphoid organs, but not in the lung, liver, or brain (24 , 25) . Moreover, localized inflammation induced by CFA up-regulates CXCL9 and CXCL10 in the draining LNs by IFN-{gamma} produced from Th1(+) lymphocytes (26 , 27) . To identify the CXCR3 ligands in inflamed LNs, we first determined by quantitative RT-PCR the mRNA levels for CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL21 in the LNs 3 days after injection of CFA or PBS (Fig. 5A)Citation . Upon inflammation, there were 2.0- and 6.7-fold increases in the mRNA levels for CXCL9 and CXCL10, respectively, whereas little CXCL11 mRNA was detected. Interestingly, CCL21 mRNA decreased to ~20% upon inflammation. The mRNAs for CCR10 ligands CCL27 and CCL28 were undetectable in the LNs (data not shown), although CCL27 is a skin-specific homeostatic chemokine (28) . We then examined expression and localization of CXCL9 and CXCL10 proteins within the LN by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5B)Citation . Both CXCL9 and CXCL10 were markedly up-regulated in the inflamed LN compared with the control LNs, and they were found mainly in the subcapsular and cortical sinuses, where CD11b (+) macrophages were abundant (data for CXCL10 not shown). Because tumor cells initially arrive at the subcapsular sinus in LNs as tumor emboli via afferent lymphatics (29) , the locale of CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression coincides with the initial arrest site of the tumor cells.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Chemokine expression in lymph node (LN) and migration of B16F10 cells toward the protein extracts of LN. A, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of chemokines in the inflamed LN, 3 days after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection. Control mice were injected with PBS. Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01). B, expression of CXCL9 protein (green) in the LN, 3 days after CFA or PBS injection, shown simultaneously with localizations of CD11b+ cells (red) and nuclei of cells within LN (blue). SS, subcapsular sinus. BF, B cell follicle. Scale bars, 20 µm. C, chemotaxis of B16F10 cells by LN extracts (1 mg of protein/sample). *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.01 (sample 3 versus 4–9), and {dagger}, P < 0.05 (sample 4 or 6 versus 8).

 
To confirm the biological activities of chemokines induced in the inflamed LNs, we additionally determined the chemotactic activities of protein extracts from the CFA-induced inflamed LNs (Fig. 5C)Citation . The extracts showed migratory responses twice as much as those of the normal LNs (sample 3). As expected, anti-CXCL9 or anti-CXCL10 antibodies significantly suppressed the migratory response in a dose-dependent manner (samples 4–7), but anti-CXCL11 or anti-CCL21 antibodies showed no effects (samples 10–13). Migration of B16F10 cells was additionally suppressed when anti-CXCL9 and anti-CXCL10 antibodies were combined (samples 8 and 9).

Enhanced Metastasis to Draining LNs by CFA-Induced CXCL9 and CXCL10.
To further confirm that CXCL9 and CXCL10 within the draining LN stimulate B16F10 metastasis, we treated host mice with CFA 3 days before the melanoma cell inoculations. One week later, the LNs from the mice preinjected with CFA contained 11 times more TRP-1 mRNA than those from the mice with PBS (Fig. 6ACitation ; P < 0.01). This increase in the TRP-1 mRNA level by injection of CFA was comparable between the mice inoculated with the parental and EV1 clones. In contrast, the mRNA level in the LN was only 17%–36% in mice inoculated with the AS1 or AS2 clones compared with that of EV1-injected mice (Fig. 6ACitation ; P < 0.01).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Stimulation of B16F10 metastasis to lymph node (LN) by treatment with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA), and its suppression by inhibition of CXCR3 expression, or by specific antibodies against CXCL9 and CXCL10. Experimental schedules are shown above each set. A, quantification of melanoma tumor marker tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1) in LN by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Each circle represents a set of 5 mouse samples pooled. Mean; bars, ±SD. (Student’s t test; *, P < 0.01). B, representative photographs of the popliteal LNs from mice injected with PBS+B16F10, CFA+B16F10, CFA+AS1, and CFA+AS2, respectively. C, representative photographs of the popliteal LNs from mice injected with CFA in the ankle, followed by footpad injection of B16F10 and subsequent treatment with control IgG or anti-CXCL9 + anti-CXCL10 antibodies. Scale in mm.

 
Three weeks after inoculations, the parental B16F10 cells formed foci in 91% (21 of 23) of the LNs in the host mice that had been injected with CFA, although the melanoma cells metastasized to only 30% (6 of 20) of LNs in mice preinjected with PBS (Table 2Citation ; P < 0.01). Importantly, this stimulation of LN metastasis by the CFA preinjection was suppressed significantly when the CXCR3 antisense-transfectant clones were inoculated (Fig. 6BCitation ; Table 2Citation ; P < 0.01). Only 46% (7 of 15) and 33% (5 of 15) of the mice inoculated with AS1- and AS2-transfected clones, respectively, showed metastatic foci of relatively small size. Regarding the primary tumor transplants, there was no significant difference in size among mice inoculated with the parental, empty vector- and antisense-transfectant clones (Table 2Citation ; Student’s t test). We also examined lung metastasis, but found no significant difference among these clones.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Metastasis frequency of B16F10 clones to LNsa on CFA injection

 
To additionally verify the roles of CXCR3 and its ligands in B16F10 metastasis to LNs, we attempted to suppress metastasis with antibodies against CXCL9 and CXCL10 induced by prior injection of CFA. Namely, we repeatedly injected neutralizing antibodies into the popliteal region around the LN and compared the effects with the control IgG isotype (Fig. 6C)Citation . Three weeks after the inoculation of parental B16F10 cells, only 3 of 7 antibody-treated mice contained macroscopic metastatic foci, although all 7 of the IgG-treated controls had LN metastasis. Furthermore, only 1 LN (i.e., 1 mouse) contained foci >1 mm among 7 mice treated with the antibodies, although all 7 of the nodes from the IgG controls contained much larger foci of 2–4 mm. Thus, CXCL9 and CXCL10 induced by CFA were responsible for the stimulation of B16F10 metastasis to the draining LNs. Inhibition of CXCR3 activation, either by reduced receptor expression or by neutralized ligand chemokines, can suppress LN metastasis at both incidence and size of the foci.

Expression of CXCR3 on Human Melanoma Cells.
Analysis by flow cytometry of several human melanoma cell lines showed that CXCR3 was expressed moderately on C32TG, G361, and HMV-I cell lines and at low levels on SK-Mel 28 (Fig. 7A)Citation . Immunofluorescence microscopy of permeabilized melanoma cells confirmed the expression of CXCR3 on C32TG, G361, and HMV-I cell lines (Fig. 7BCitation ; data for G361 or HMV-I not shown). We additionally found in vivo expression of CXCR3 protein in primary human melanoma samples by immunohistochemistry. Samples from 5 of 9 patients expressed CXCR3 (Fig. 7C)Citation .



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Expression of CXCR3 on human melanoma cells. A, fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of CXCR3 expression on C32TG, G361, HMV-I, and SK-Mel 28 cell lines. Filled histograms represent cells stained with anti-CXCR3 antibody; open histograms represent unstained cells. B, fluorescence staining of CXCR3. C32TG cells were stained with anti-CXCR3 antibody (right) or IgG isotype (left). C, immunohistochemical evaluation of CXCR3 expression. Primary human melanoma tissues of two patients (cases 1 and 2). Staining with antihuman CXCR3 antibody (right) and negative controls stained with the IgG isotype (left). Hematoxylin counterstaining. Scale bars, 100 µm.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Metastasis appears to be an inefficient process because only a few metastatic foci are formed even when millions of cancer cells are injected into a mouse (30) . Recent studies revealed that the least efficient steps in metastasis are the growth of the micrometastatic foci and their persistence (31) , which strongly suggests the importance of interactions between cancer cells and the tissue environment of the specific metastatic sites. Accumulating evidence indicates that organ-specific metastasis can be aided by interactions between chemokine receptors on cancer cells and ligand chemokines in target organs. For example, breast cancer cells express CXCR4 and preferentially metastasize to lung and bone that are abundant in CXCR4-specific ligand CXCL12 (7 , 32) . It has been demonstrated that CXCR3 and CXCR4 are expressed in human melanoma cell lines as well as melanoma foci in infiltrated LNs and that expression of CXCR3 is often higher than that of CXCR4 (10) . Notably, forced expression of CXCR4 in B16 melanoma cells enhances pulmonary metastasis, but metastasis to LNs, liver, or kidneys is not affected (33) . Here, we have demonstrated that CXCR3 signaling is responsible for LN metastasis of B16F10 cells, without affecting metastasis to the lung. These results collectively indicate that distinct chemokine receptors control metastasis of melanoma cells to specific organs, CXCR3 to LNs and CXCR4 to lungs. We also found that CXCR3 is expressed in both B16F10 (high metastatic potential) and B16F1 cells (low metastatic potential) at similar levels (data not shown). Because B16F10 cells were selected for their ability to colonize the lung after cycles of i.v. injection and isolation from metastatic lung foci (34) , expression of CXCR3 was not affected by the selection, probably.

Sentinel LNs in tumor-bearing hosts are the primary site where specific immune responses to the tumor antigens can be initiated to develop systemic tumor immunity (3 , 35 , 36) . In addition to the intrinsic immunogenicity of tumor cells, the modes and amounts of tumor cells migrating into the sentinel LN significantly affect whether efficient immune responses can be elicited against them (36) . LNs often show reactive histopathology with tumors, as follicular hyperplasia, sinus histiocytosis, lymphoid cell depletion, fibrosis, angiogenesis, sarcoid reaction, and so forth (37 , 38) , although their precise roles in tumor dissemination remain unknown. Thus, migration of tumor cells from the primary sites into sentinel LNs is an important process for both possible host antitumor responses and establishment of eventual tumor metastasis. In the present study, we have demonstrated that CXCL9 and CXCL10 within LNs facilitate B16F10 melanoma cell metastasis through CXCR3, whereas it remains to be investigated whether accelerated migration of B16F10 cells into LNs helps initiate specific antitumor immunity or not.

CXCR3 is induced on Th1-type lymphocytes upon activation by IFN-{gamma} (39) , and its ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 are also up-regulated by IFN-{gamma}, attracting effector Th1 cells to the sites of local inflammation (40, 41, 42) . It has been demonstrated that CXCL9 and CXCL10 are responsible, at least in part, for the antitumor effect of IL-12 that is mediated by IFN-{gamma} (43) . In fact, CXCL9 gene therapy combined with an antibody-IL-2 fusion protein suppresses growth and lung metastasis of mouse colon carcinoma cells (44) . CXCL9 also promotes tumor necrosis when injected directly into the tumor tissue (45) . Notably, CXCL9 and CXCL10 play additional roles in tumor microenvironment. For example, CXCL9 activates RhoA and Rac1, induces actin reorganization, and triggers migration and invasion of human melanoma cells (10) . Here we have demonstrated that CXCL9 and CXCL10 within LNs facilitate B16F10 metastasis to LNs through CXCR3 signaling, which causes such diverse cellular effects as cytoskeletal reorganization, migration, invasion, and enhanced cell survival. In the tumor microenvironment, abundant host leukocytes are often found in both the tumor tissue and stroma (46) . It is suggested that inflammatory cells, cytokines, and chemokines found in tumors are more likely to contribute to tumor growth, progression, and immunosuppression than they are to mount an effective host antitumor response (47) . For example, tumor-associated macrophages, a major component of the inflammatory infiltrates, play dual roles. Although they may kill tumor cells after activation by IL-2, IL-12, and IFN (48) , tumor-associated macrophages produce a number of potent angiogenic and lymphangiogenic growth factors, cytokines, and proteases that can enhance tumor progression. Thus, our present results suggest that inhibition of CXCR3 receptor may be a potential therapeutic target against LN metastasis of melanomas and other CXCR3-expressing tumor cells.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Shin-ichi Nishikawa, Sidonia Fagarasan, and Masahiro Aoki for fruitful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture and the Organization of Pharmaceutical Safety and Research, Japan.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Makoto Mark Taketo, Department of Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoé-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. E-mail: taketo{at}mfour.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Received 6/16/03. Revised 3/ 1/04. Accepted 3/22/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. McCarthy WH, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, Milton GW. Time and frequency of recurrence of cutaneous stage I malignant melanoma with guidelines for follow-up study. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 166: 497-502, 1988.[Medline]
  2. Fisher B, Fisher ER. The interrelationship of hematogenous and lymphatic tumor cell dissemination. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 122: 791-8, 1966.[Medline]
  3. Gendreau KM, Whalen GF. What can we learn from the phenomenon of preferential lymph node metastasis in carcinoma?. J Surg Oncol, 70: 199-204, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Coit DG, Rogatko A, Brennan MF. Prognostic factors in patients with melanoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes. A multivariate analysis. Ann Surg, 214: 627-36, 1991.[Medline]
  5. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature, 420: 860-7, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Wang JM, Deng X, Gong W, Su S. Chemokines and their role in tumor growth and metastasis. J Immunol Methods, 220: 1-17, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Müller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature, 410: 50-6, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Wiley HE, Gonzalez EB, Maki W, Wu M, Hwang ST. Expression of CC chemokine receptor-7 and regional lymph node metastasis of B16 murine melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst, 93: 1638-43, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Scotton CJ, Wilson JL, Milliken D, Stamp G, Balkwill FR. Epithelial cancer cell migration: A role for chemokine receptor?. Cancer Res, 61: 4961-5, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Robledo MM, Bartolome RA, Longo N, et al Expression of functional chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR4 on human melanoma cells. J Biol Chem, 276: 45098-105, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Trentin L, Agostini C, Facco M, et al The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is expressed on malignant B cells and mediates chemotaxis. J Clin Investig, 104: 115-21, 1999.[Medline]
  12. Saiki I, Murata J, Nakajima M, Tokura S, Azuma I. Inhibition by sulfated chitin derivatives of invasive through extracellular matrix and enzymatic degradation by metastatic melanoma cells. Cancer Res, 50: 3631-7, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hujanen ES, Terranova VP. Migration of tumor cells to organ-derived chemoattractants. Cancer Res, 45: 3517-21, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Whalen GF, Sharif SF. Locally increased metastatic efficiency as a reason for preferential metastasis of solid tumors to lymph nodes. Ann Surg, 215: 166-71, 1992.[Medline]
  15. Jenh C-H, Cox MA, Kaminski H, et al Cutting edge: species specificity of the CC chemokine 6Ckine signaling through the CXC chemokine receptor CXCR3: human 6Ckine is not a ligand for the human or mouse CXCR3 receptors. J Immunol, 162: 3765-9, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lu B, Humbles A, Bota D, et al Structure and function of the murine chemokine receptor CXCR3. Eur J Immunol, 29: 3804-12, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Bleul CC, Fuhlbrigge RC, Casasnovas JM, Aiuti A, Springer TA. A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1(SDF-1). J Exp Med, 184: 1101-9, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Craig SW, Johnson RP. Assembly of focal adhesions: progress, paradigms, and portents. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 8: 74-85, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Turner CE. Paxillin and focal adhesion signalling. Nature Cell Biol, 2: E231-6, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Barbero S, Bonavia R, Bajetto A, et al Stromal cell-derived factor 1{alpha} stimulates human glioblastoma cell growth through the activation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 and Akt. Cancer Res, 63: 1969-74, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vlahakis SR, Villasis-Keever A, Gomez T, Vanegas M, Vlahakis N, Paya CV. G protein-coupled chemokine receptors induce both survival and apoptotic signaling pathways. J Immunol, 169: 5546-54, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Burger JA, Burger M, Kipps TJ. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells express functional CXCR4 chemokine receptors that mediate spontaneous migration beneath bone marrow stromal cells. Blood, 94: 3658-67, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bieligk SC, Ghossein R, Bhattacharya S, Coit DG. Detection of tyrosinase mRNA by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in melanoma sentinel nodes. Ann Surg Oncol, 6: 232-40, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gattass CR, King LB, Luster AD, Ashwell JD. Constitutive expression of interferon {gamma}-inducible protein 10 in lymphoid organs and inducible expression in T cells and thymocytes. J Exp Med, 179: 1373-8, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Amichay D, Gazzinelli RT, Karupiah G, Moench TR, Sher A, Farber JM. Genes for chemokines MuMig and Crg-2 are induced in protozoan and viral infections in response to IFN-{gamma} with patterns of tissue expression that suggest nonredundant roles in vivo. J Immunol, 157: 4511-20, 1996.[Abstract]
  26. Janatpour MJ, Hudak S, Sathe M, Sedgwick JD, McEvoy LM. Tumor necrosis factor-dependent segmental control of MIG expression by high endothelial venules in inflamed lymph nodes regulates monocyte recruitment. J Exp Med, 193: 1375-84, 2001.
  27. Billiau A, Matthys P. Modes of action of Freund’s adjuvants in experimental models of autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol, 70: 849-60, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Homey B, Wang W, Soto H, et al Cutting edge: the orphan chemokine receptor G protein-coupled receptor-2 (GPR-2, CCR10) binds the skin-associated chemokine CCL27 (CTACK/ALP/ILC). J Immunol, 164: 3465-70, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Weiss L. The pathobiology of metastasis within the lymphatic system. Surg Oncol Clin North Am, 5: 15-24, 1996.[Medline]
  30. Fidler IJ, Kripke ML. Metastasis results from pre-existing variant cells within a malignant tumor. Science, 197: 893-5, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nature Rev Cancer, 2: 563-72, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Kang Y, Siegel PM, Shu W, et al A mutigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell, 3: 537-49, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Murakami T, Maki W, Cardones AR, et al Expression of CXC chemokine receptor-4 enhances the pulmonary metastatic potential of murine B16 melanoma cells. Cancer Res, 62: 7328-34, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fidler IJ. Selection of successive tumour lines for metastasis. Nature New Biol, 242: 148-9, 1973.[Medline]
  35. Pardoll D. T cells and tumours. Nature, 411: 1010-2, 2001.[Medline]
  36. Ochsenbein AF, Sierro S, Odermatt B, et al Roles of tumour localization, second signals and cross priming in cytotoxic T-cell induction. Nature, 411: 1058-64, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Oka M, Yoshino S, Hazama S, Shimoda K, Suzuki M, Suzuki T. Prognostic significance of regional lymph node reaction after curative resection of advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg, 79: 1091-4, 1992.[Medline]
  38. Giorgio AD, Mingazzini P, Sammartino P, Canavese A, Arnone P, Scarpini M. Host defense and survival in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer, 89: 2038-45, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Rossi D, Zlotnik A. The biology of chemokines and their receptors. Annu Rev Immunol, 18: 217-42, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Farber JM. A macrophage mRNA selectively induced by {gamma}-interferon encodes a member of the platelet factor 4 family of cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 87: 5238-42, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Luster AD, Unkeless JC, Ravetch JV. {gamma}-Interferon transcriptionally regulates an early response gene containing homology to platelet protein. Nature, 315: 672-6, 1985.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Cole KE, Strick CA, Paradis TJ, et al Interferon-inducible T cell {alpha} chemoattractant (I-TAC): a novel non-ELR CXC chemokine with potent activity on activated T cells through selective high affinity binding to CXCR3. J Exp Med, 187: 2009-21, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Tannenbaum CS, Tubbs R, Armstrong D, Finke JH, Bukowski RM, Hamilton TA. The CXC chemokines IP-10 and Mig are necessary for IL-12 –mediated regression of the mouse RENCA tumor. J Immunol, 161: 927-32, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ruehlmann JM, Xiang R, Niethammer AG, et al MIG (CXCL9) chemokine gene therapy combines with antibody-cytokine fusion protein to suppress growth and dissemination of murine colon carcinoma. Cancer Res, 61: 8498-503, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Sgadari C, Farber JM, Angiolillo AL, et al Mig, the monokine induced by interferon-{gamma}, promotes tumor necrosis in vivo. Blood, 89: 2635-43, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Negus RPK, Stamp GWO, Hadley J, Balkwill FR. Quantitative assessment of the leukocyte infiltrate on ovarian cancer and its relationship to the expression of C-C chemokines. Am J Pathol, 150: 1723-34, 1997.[Abstract]
  47. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?. Lancet, 357: 539-45, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Tsung K, Dolan JP, Tsung YL, Norton JA. Macrophages as effector cells in interleukin 12-induced T cell-dependent tumor rejection. Cancer Res, 62: 5069-75, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
V. L. Martins, J. J. Vyas, M. Chen, K. Purdie, C. A. Mein, A. P. South, A. Storey, J. A. McGrath, and E. A. O'Toole
Increased invasive behaviour in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with loss of basement-membrane type VII collagen
J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2009; 122(11): 1788 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. E. G. Rothberg, M. B. Bracken, and D. L. Rimm
Tissue Biomarkers for Prognosis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 1, 2009; 101(7): 452 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
X. Ma, K. Norsworthy, N. Kundu, W. H. Rodgers, P. A. Gimotty, O. Goloubeva, M. Lipsky, Y. Li, D. Holt, and A. Fulton
CXCR3 expression is associated with poor survival in breast cancer and promotes metastasis in a murine model
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2009; 8(3): 490 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. Landsman, L. Bar-On, A. Zernecke, K.-W. Kim, R. Krauthgamer, E. Shagdarsuren, S. A. Lira, I. L. Weissman, C. Weber, and S. Jung
CX3CR1 is required for monocyte homeostasis and atherogenesis by promoting cell survival
Blood, January 22, 2009; 113(4): 963 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Richmond
CCR9 Homes Metastatic Melanoma Cells to the Small Bowel
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 621 - 623.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. F. Amersi, A. M. Terando, Y. Goto, R. A. Scolyer, J. F. Thompson, A. N. Tran, M. B. Faries, D. L. Morton, and D. S.B. Hoon
Activation of CCR9/CCL25 in Cutaneous Melanoma Mediates Preferential Metastasis to the Small Intestine
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 638 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Kitamura and M. M. Taketo
Keeping Out the Bad Guys: Gateway to Cellular Target Therapy
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10099 - 10102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
C Monteagudo, J M Martin, E Jorda, and A Llombart-Bosch
CXCR3 chemokine receptor immunoreactivity in primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: correlation with clinicopathological prognostic factors
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2007; 60(6): 596 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Zipin-Roitman, T. Meshel, O. Sagi-Assif, B. Shalmon, C. Avivi, R. M. Pfeffer, I. P. Witz, and A. Ben-Baruch
CXCL10 Promotes Invasion-Related Properties in Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3396 - 3405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Zhang, D. W. Chan, Y. Zhu, J. J. Li, I. O.-L. Ng, D. Wan, and J. Gu
Identification of Carboxypeptidase of Glutamate Like-B as a Candidate Suppressor in Cell Growth and Metastasis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6617 - 6625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Datta, J. A. Flaxenburg, S. Laxmanan, C. Geehan, M. Grimm, A. M. Waaga-Gasser, D. M. Briscoe, and S. Pal
Ras-induced Modulation of CXCL10 and Its Receptor Splice Variant CXCR3-B in MDA-MB-435 and MCF-7 Cells: Relevance for the Development of Human Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9509 - 9518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. C. Walser, S. Rifat, X. Ma, N. Kundu, C. Ward, O. Goloubeva, M. G. Johnson, J. C. Medina, T. L. Collins, and A. M. Fulton
Antagonism of CXCR3 Inhibits Lung Metastasis in a Murine Model of Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7701 - 7707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Dagan-Berger, R. Feniger-Barish, S. Avniel, H. Wald, E. Galun, V. Grabovsky, R. Alon, A. Nagler, A. Ben-Baruch, and A. Peled
Role of CXCR3 carboxyl terminus and third intracellular loop in receptor-mediated migration, adhesion and internalization in response to CXCL11
Blood, May 15, 2006; 107(10): 3821 - 3831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. O. Aksoy, Y. Yang, R. Ji, P. J. Reddy, S. Shahabuddin, J. Litvin, T. J. Rogers, and S. G. Kelsen
CXCR3 surface expression in human airway epithelial cells: cell cycle dependence and effect on cell proliferation
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): L909 - L918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Scala, P. Giuliano, P. A. Ascierto, C. Ierano, R. Franco, M. Napolitano, A. Ottaiano, M. L. Lombardi, M. Luongo, E. Simeone, et al.
Human Melanoma Metastases Express Functional CXCR4
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 12(8): 2427 - 2433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Johrer, C. Zelle-Rieser, A. Perathoner, P. Moser, M. Hager, R. Ramoner, H. Gander, L. Holtl, G. Bartsch, R. Greil, et al.
Up-Regulation of Functional Chemokine Receptor CCR3 in Human Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2459 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Scala, A. Ottaiano, P. A. Ascierto, M. Cavalli, E. Simeone, P. Giuliano, M. Napolitano, R. Franco, G. Botti, and G. Castello
Expression of CXCR4 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1835 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Taketo, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Taketo, M. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online