| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
1 Department of Molecular Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California; 2 Cancer Institute Medical Group, Santa Monica, California; and 3 Department of Biomathematics, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Concurrent administration of biochemotherapy (BC) has shown improvements in response in American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma patients (7, 8, 9, 10, 11) . However, as with most treatment regimens, patient response is difficult to predict. Identification of molecular predictors of therapeutic response may permit more efficient use of resources and improve stratification design strategies.
It is suggested that circulating DNA in the serum/plasma of cancer patients has clinical use as potential markers for disease surveillance (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . Previously, we identified circulating tumor microsatellites with AI in the acellular serum/plasma of melanoma (16, 17, 18) . AI in blood correlated with AI in the respective melanoma tumors and was associated with poorer disease outcome (19) . Identifying surrogate serum tumor genetic determinants would be of novel clinical use for assessing therapeutic efficacy and follow-up. On the hypothesis that AI on APAF-1 locus in serum can predict response to BC treatment, we assessed the detection of circulating DNA microsatellites in acellular serum from melanoma patients receiving BC. To determine whether detection of AI on 12q22-23 in circulating DNA could be a surrogate predictor of response to treatment and disease progression, serial serum genetic analysis on 49 American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma patients before administration of BC (pre-BC serum) and after its completion (post-BC serum) was conducted.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-2b, interleukin 2, and tamoxifen as previously reported (7
, 8)
were selected based on availability of serum and follow-up data (Table 1)
|
Microsatellite Analysis.
Four microsatellite markers (D12S1657, D12S393, D12S1706, D12S346) encompassing the APAF-1 gene locus (12q22-23), which were frequent for identifying loss of heterozygosity in primary and metastatic melanomas (6)
, were used for this analysis. The locations of microsatellite markers and APAF-1 gene were verified using the current updated National Center for Biotechnology Information database (February 2004). PCR primer sets for specific allele loci were obtained from Research Genetics, Inc. (Huntsville, AL). Forward primers were labeled with WellRed phosphoramidite-linked dye or active ester-labeled dye. The PCR amplification was performed in a 10-µl reaction volume with 1 µl of template for 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C, followed by a 7-min final extension at 72°C. PCR product separation was performed using capillary array electrophoresis (CAE CEQ 8000XL; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Peak signal intensity and relative size were generated by a fragment analysis system software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). AI was defined when one allele showed
40% reduction of peak intensity for serum DNA as compared with the corresponding allele identified in the control DNA. The markers showing homozygosity, microsatellite instabilities, and insufficient PCR amplification were scored as noninformative. Five sera in which
1 marker was informative were excluded from clinical correlation analysis because of difficulty to define AI status on this locus by one or less marker. All AI were confirmed by repeating the assay.
Statistical Analysis.
Correlation between AI on 12q22-23 and BC response was assessed using the Fishers exact test. Survival length was determined from the first day of BC treatment, to death, or the date of last clinical follow-up. Survival curves were drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between curves were analyzed using the log-rank test. Coxs proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate analysis and calculation of the risk ratio (19)
. Stepwise variable selection was adopted with a selection rule of P < 0.1 for variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 marker was informative were excluded from clinical correlation analysis because of the difficulty to define AI status using one or less informative marker. Samples AI positive for at least one marker was found in 16 of 44 (36%) pre-BC serum and 16 of 44 (36%) post-BC serum. Representative examples are shown in Fig. 2
|
|
AI-positive group in pre-BC serum had significantly worse survival than the AI-negative group (log-rank test, P = 0.046; Fig. 3A
). Response to BC had a significant effect on overall survival (log-rank test, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3B
). Using a Coxs proportional hazards regression model, AI in pre-BC serum and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (>190 IU/liter) significantly correlated with survival (AI in pre-BC serum, risk ratio 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.085.03, P = 0.032; lactate dehydrogenase, risk ratio 2.82, 95% confidence interval 1.236.54, P = 0.015). Other prognostic factors in the model such as sex, age, and number of metastatic disease sites were not significant. Because of the significant correlation of AI with BC response, BC response was excluded from variables.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six responder patients with AI negative in pre-BC serum became AI positive in post-BC serum. One possibility is that there is increasing tumor-derived serum DNA caused by continued BC-induced apoptosis. An alternative hypothesis is that continual treatment of these patients selected for AI-positive dominant tumor cell clones. There is also a possibility of long-term circulating DNA from BC responses. There is continual debate as to the half-life of circulating DNA. Recent studies measuring fetal DNA from maternal plasma (20) indicated that circulating DNA is cleared rapidly and that the estimated half-life is <1 h. One of the objectives of BC therapy is to attack through multiple targets on tumor cells. However, if the agents mechanism of death all rely on the APAF-1-induced pathway, then there is limited benefit. BC treatment likely will influence the clonal selection of specific melanoma cells resistant to treatment. In responder cases, BC therapy could kill the majority of APAF-1-expressing tumor cells, thus leaving behind minimal disease. Long-term BC therapy and other systemic therapies may promote selection of APAF-1-negative clones that eventually become a dominant metastatic phenotype. This may explain why long-term remissions are rare and why melanoma patients with systemic metastasis are generally poor and why there are nonresponders to immuno-, chemo-, and radiotherapy.
One of the major problems in assessing tumor genetic markers is the availability of melanoma tumor specimens from distant metastasis. The ability to assess serial blood for tumor genetic markers provides a facile approach to monitor tumor progression or response to therapy. Previously, we identified circulating tumor DNA microsatellites with AI in the acellular plasma of patients with melanoma (16, 17) . The circulating DNA AI correlated with genetic alterations present in the respective melanoma tumors and with poorer disease outcome. Identifying serum circulating tumor genetic determinants as surrogates particularly relevant to apoptosis resistance would be of significant clinical use for therapeutic design. Most approaches in patient treatments focus on the target gene(s) instead of the susceptibility of the tumor to undergo apoptosis. This information may prove vital in predicting individual patient treatment responses.
Melanoma progression is associated with continued selection of clones that resist apoptosis. Systemic melanoma metastasis is a product of genotypic selection of clones that can proliferate and overcome apoptosis. Systemic metastatic tumors are usually highly genetically unstable and heterogeneous. Serum DNA is likely to represent the genotype of the most dominant tumor clone present at the time of analysis. BC may additionally induce clonal selection, whereby resistant tumor cells survive and become more dominant after therapy. Therefore, to address this problem, it may be more efficacious to create treatment regimens that target multiple different critical cell regulatory pathways not related to each other. The study was focused on American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma patients with poor prognosis. The purpose of the study was to develop a method to predict patients likely to respond to BC. To date, the BC treatment is still controversial and needs validating. Identification of patients likely to respond would have a significant improvement efficacy. One of the limitations in the study is that all responder patients are not identified; development of other potential informative DNA markers relating to key apoptosis factors need to be assessed to improve predictive sensitivity. A limitation to the assay at this time that needs to be additionally worked out is obtaining sufficient DNA from serum to perform a more comprehensive and quantitative analysis.
The retention of heterozygosity in the serum DNA analysis is demonstrated, and three plausible explanations can be provided: (a) the tumor cell does not carry AI at the locus; (b) homozygous deletion at the locus has occurred in tumor cells; and/or (c) tumor-derived DNA in serum can be underdetected because of low abundance or interference of cell-derived DNA. These factors may effect the interpretations of the results. Additional refinement of the technology and the addition of informative markers may improve the assay efficacy.
Our results suggest that AI on 12q22-23 is an important determining factor for response to BC and becomes a dominant functional genotypic aberration with disease progression. Advanced melanomas are more likely to be resistant to therapy that requires the activation of the APAF-1-intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Development of therapeutics to supplement APAF-1 function in the apoptosis pathway may be needed to improve treatment efficiency in melanoma patients. This study demonstrates that detecting loss of a key apoptotic gene locus in serum can be used as a surrogate genetic determinant in cancer patients to predict response to therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the association between a circulating tumor DNA of a specific apoptosis gene locus and patients disease outcome in response to therapy. Circulating AI of 12q22-23 may be used as a potential prognostic marker of melanoma progression during therapy, whereby serial serum genetic analysis monitoring can be accomplished. The study needs to be validated with other forms of therapy to determine their universal efficacy in predicting treatment response. Serial serum genetic analysis offers a new approach of monitoring tumor genetic changes in patients with systemic disease in which a tumor is not available.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Dave S. B. Hoon, Department of Molecular Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, 2200 Santa Monica Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90404. Phone: (310) 449-5267; Fax: (310)449-5282; E-mail: hoon{at}jwci.org
Received 3/17/04. Revised 4/21/04. Accepted 4/26/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Sunami, M. Shinozaki, C. S. Higano, R. Wollman, T. B. Dorff, S. J. Tucker, S. R. Martinez, F. R. Singer, and D. S.B. Hoon Multimarker Circulating DNA Assay for Assessing Blood of Prostate Cancer Patients Clin. Chem., March 1, 2009; 55(3): 559 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhivotovsky and S. Orrenius Carcinogenesis and apoptosis: paradigms and paradoxes Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 1939 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Umetani, A. E. Giuliano, S. H. Hiramatsu, F. Amersi, T. Nakagawa, S. Martino, and D. S.B. Hoon Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression by Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Serum J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4270 - 4276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mori, S. R. Martinez, S. J. O'Day, D. L. Morton, N. Umetani, M. Kitago, A. Tanemura, S. L. Nguyen, A. N. Tran, H.-J. Wang, et al. Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Methylation Predicts Melanoma Progression. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6692 - 6698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Koyanagi, T. Mori, S. J. O'Day, S. R. Martinez, H.-J. Wang, and D. S.B. Hoon Association of circulating tumor cells with serum tumor-related methylated DNA in peripheral blood of melanoma patients. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6111 - 6117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Umetani, J. Kim, S. Hiramatsu, H. A. Reber, O. J. Hines, A. J. Bilchik, and D. S. B. Hoon Increased Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Sera of Patients with Colorectal or Periampullary Cancer: Direct Quantitative PCR for ALU Repeats. Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 1062 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bajetta, M. Del Vecchio, P. Nova, A. Fusi, A. Daponte, M. R. Sertoli, P. Queirolo, P. Taveggia, M. G. Bernengo, S. S. Legha, et al. Multicenter phase III randomized trial of polychemotherapy (CVD regimen) versus the same chemotherapy (CT) plus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-{alpha}2b in metastatic melanoma Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 571 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mori, S. J. O'Day, N. Umetani, S. R. Martinez, M. Kitago, K. Koyanagi, C. Kuo, T.-L. Takeshima, R. Milford, H.-J. Wang, et al. Predictive Utility of Circulating Methylated DNA in Serum of Melanoma Patients Receiving Biochemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9351 - 9358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mori, J. Kim, T. Yamano, H. Takeuchi, S. Huang, N. Umetani, K. Koyanagi, and D. S.B. Hoon Epigenetic Up-regulation of C-C Chemokine Receptor 7 and C-X-C Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression in Melanoma Cells Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1800 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |