Cancer Research Donn Young  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelderman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelderman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, A.
[Cancer Research 64, 4366-4372, June 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Immunology

Tumor-Specific Inhibition of Membrane-Bound Complement Regulatory Protein Crry with Bispecific Monoclonal Antibodies Prevents Tumor Outgrowth in a Rat Colorectal Cancer Lung Metastases Model

Kyra A. Gelderman1, Peter J. K. Kuppen2, Noriko Okada3, Gert Jan Fleuren1 and Arko Gorter1

Departments of 1 Pathology and 2 Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, and 3 Department of Molecular Biology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins (mCRP) inhibit complement-mediated tumor cell eradication in vitro and in vivo. Immunotherapy of cancer with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that activate complement might be hampered by expression of mCRP on tumor cells. An important strategy to improve mAb immunotherapy can be blocking or overwhelming mCRP at the tumor cells surface in a tumor-specific manner. In our study, we investigated the feasibility of this approach in vivo using bispecific mAbs (bi-mAbs). This study, performed in a syngeneic lung metastases model of rat (WAG/Rij) colorectal cancer, showed that modulation of mCRP on tumor cells resulted in significantly decreased tumor outgrowth. Opsonization of tumor cells with a bi-mAb directed against a tumor-associated antigen and rat mCRP Crry (MG42a*5I2) almost completely prevented the outgrowth of lung tumors (0–7 tumors/rat; n = 17). Opsonization with mAb-cobra venom factor conjugates significantly reduced the number of lung tumors (23–59 tumors; n = 12) compared with the unconjugated MG42a (175–246 tumors; n = 17; P = 0.008 and 0.014, respectively). The effect of MG42a*5I2 was shown to be caused by increased complement activation due to inhibition of Crry. Moreover, prophylactic treatment with MG42a*5I2 or MG42a showed comparable results (3–24 and 215–472 tumors, P = 0.02; n = 6) as observed with pre-opsonized tumor cells without noticeable side effects, despite binding of MG42a*5I2 to endothelium and leukocytes. These results demonstrate that Crry inhibits complement-mediated tumor cell eradication by immunotherapeutic mAbs and show that tumor-specific inhibition of complement regulatory proteins using bi-mAbs can significantly improve mAb-mediated immunotherapy.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumors have developed several strategies to circumvent the host immune system. One of these strategies is to overexpress membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins (mCRP) that inhibit complement activation (1, 2, 3) . Because complement activation can be an important effector mechanism of monoclonal antibody (mAb)-mediated immunotherapy of cancer, mCRP expression might hamper the therapeutic effect (4) . This might be an explanation for the until now disappointing results of immunotherapeutic mAbs in the clinic (5) . That these immunotherapeutic mAbs were previously successful in animal models can be explained by the use of tumor xenograft models and the observation that mCRP operate in a species selective fashion (6 , 7) . This underlines the need for appropriate animal models, with mCRP and complement of the same species, to investigate the effect of mCRP on cancer immunotherapy with mAbs.

In humans, there are three important mCRP expressed by tumor cells. CD46 is a cofactor for factor I-mediated cleavage of C3b and C4b, and CD55 accelerates the decay of C3 and C5 convertases (8) . Both CD46 and CD55 inhibit the formation of the chemoattractants C3a and C5a and the deposition of C3b (further converted to iC3b) on the cell surface, thereby preventing attraction and activation of effector cells expressing Fc and complement receptors and subsequent complement-mediated cellular cytotoxicity (9) . CD59 inhibits the formation of the membrane attack complex, thereby preventing direct complement-mediated lysis (8) . In addition to the above-described mCRP, rodents express an additional C3 regulatory protein Crry/p65 (Crry), whereas CD46 expression is restricted to the testes. Crry is a functional homologue of CD46 and CR1 (10) , thus acting at the level of C3, similar to human CD46 and CD55. Crry has been shown to be the most important C3 regulatory protein on tumor cells in rats (11 , 12) . Therefore, modulation of Crry on tumor cells is a suitable model for the modulation of human membrane-bound C3 regulatory proteins.

Previously, it has been shown that systemic inhibition of Crry by i.p. injection of anti-Crry mAbs in rats results in severe side effects, including endothelial damage, peritoneal hemorrhage, and death (13) , as a result of unhampered massive complement activation, due to the ubiquitous expression of Crry. Therefore, when therapeutically inhibiting Crry on tumor cells, anti-Crry mAbs cannot be administered systemically, and manipulation should be primarily restricted to the tumor cells. To obtain this goal, we have investigated the feasibility of using bispecific mAbs (bi-mAbs) that both recognize a tumor antigen and Crry in a syngeneic rat model for colorectal cancer.

Previously, we have described that bi-mAb directed against Ep-CAM and CD55 as well as anti-Ep-CAM-CVF conjugates causes increased amounts of C3 deposition on human colorectal tumor cells in vitro as compared with the anti-Ep-CAM mAb alone (14) . In the present study, to follow up on these in vitro studies, we have investigated the effect of blocking or overwhelming the effect of Crry on in vitro opsonized rat colon carcinoma cells in a syngeneic rat colorectal cancer lung metastases model. Blocking the function of Crry was achieved by using bi-mAbs, which possessed an arm recognizing a rat tumor antigen for tumor-specific homing and an arm that blocked Crry (15 , 16) . Overwhelming the function of Crry was achieved by tumor-specific targeting of cobra venom factor (CVF) with mAb-CVF conjugates (17) . Control bi-mAb and anti-Crry F(ab)2 fragments were used to show that the observed effect of bi-mAbs was indeed due to the modulation of Crry. Finally, to mimic adjuvant mAb immunotherapy a prophylactic experiment was performed, to substantiate the in vivo observations in a therapeutic setting.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies and Sera.
The cell line producing 5I2 (IgG1), a blocking mAb directed against Crry, was a kind gift from Prof. Dr. H. Okada (Nagoya City University School of Medicine, Japan). The MG42a (IgG2a) and CC52 (IgG1) mAb directed against the rat colon adenocarcinoma cell line CC531 were produced as previously described (11 , 18) . FITC-conjugated goat antimouse IgG/M was obtained from DAKO A/S (Glostrup, Denmark). FITC-conjugated goat antirat C3 was purchased from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Aurora, OH). Rat antimouse IgG1 (Sanbio, Uden, The Netherlands) and goat antimouse IgG2a conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology Associates) were used for the bi-isotypic ELISA.

Quadroma cells producing bi-mAb MG42a*5I2 and MG42a*CC52 were obtained by fusion of the respective hybridomas (18 , 19) and tested and purified as described before (16) : The fractions that were eluted from protein A with pH 5.5 were tested for bi-isotypicity with a sandwich ELISA. Fractions were incubated on a plate coated with rat antimouse IgG1 and detected with goat antimouse IgG2a conjugated with horseradish peroxidase as described before. Positive fractions were pooled and tested for purity and bi-isotypicity with SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels under nonreducing conditions.

Bispecificity of bi-isotypic mAb was tested with a conjugation test: CC531 cells preincubated with 5I2 or CC52 F(ab)2 fragments were opsonized with bi-mAbs and respectively exposed to LT12 cells that expressed Crry but no MG4 or to CC531 cells opsonized with MG4 F(ab)2 fragments. Whereas approximately 25% of cross-linking of these cells was observed with flow cytometry, bi-mAbs were considered to contain mAbs that recognized the two antigens (16) .

Syngeneic normal rat serum was prepared by centrifugation on 4°C of coagulated blood of WAG/Rij rats.

F(ab)2 Fragments.
F(ab)2 fragments were produced as previously described previously (20) . In short, 9 units of mAb were incubated with 1 unit of 1 M citrate and 2 units of 0.1 M HCl together with 100 units of pepsin-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) for 2 h at 37°. The reaction was stopped with an equal volume of 3 M Tris. The solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 7,000 x g, and the F(ab)2 containing supernatant was dialyzed against PBS. No fragments other than the F(ab)2 fragments were detected in this preparation by SDS-PAGE.

Tumor Cells.
The CC531 cell line (21) was cultured in RPMI 1640 culture, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 units/ml penicillin (all from Life Technologies, Paisley, United Kingdom). Tumor cells used for in vitro experiments were kept in culture for several passages. Cells used in vivo were all from the same passage and always cultured according to a standard schedule according to which cells were passaged every 4 days and fresh medium was supplied every other day for 2 weeks.

mAb-CVF Conjugates.
CVF was isolated and tested for hemolytic activity as described before as was the conjugation of CVF to mAb (14 , 17) . In short, 5 mg of antibody and 2.5 mg of CVF were incubated with N-succinimidyl-3(2-pyridyldithio)proprionate (Sigma Aldrich). mAb-N-succinimidyl-3(2-pyridyldithio)proprionate was reduced with DTT and allowed to form conjugates with CVF-N-succinimidyl-3(2-pyridyldithio)proprionate overnight at room temperature. Conjugates were isolated by gel filtration (S300 column; Pharmacia), and positive fractions were pooled. Purity of the conjugates was determined by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% gel under nonreducing conditions and by high-pressure liquid chromatography with a superdex200 column (Pharmacia). Only fractions containing mAb:CVF at a ratio of 1:1 were used in the experiments. Protein concentrations were determined using a spectrophotometer using E280 = 1.2 for 1 mg/ml mAb conjugates (17) .

Complement Activation ELISA.
Conjugate (20 µg/ml) or mAb (10 µg/ml) was coated in 0.1 M NaHCO3 buffer (pH 9.6) for 2 h at 37°C on a 96-well plate. After washing three times with PBS containing 0.01% Tween 20, nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating the wells for 30 min with 1% gelatin in PBS/Tween. After washing three times with PBS without Tween, different syngeneic normal rat serum dilutions, starting with 10%, in gelatin veronal buffered saline containing 2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM MgCl2 (GVB++) were added as a source of rat complement and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. When the syngeneic normal rat serum was washed away, C3 deposition was detected with mouse antirat C3 conjugated to digoxigenin (ED11, a kind gift of Dr. A. Roos, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden), diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA and incubated for 30 min. Anti-digoxigenin-horseradish peroxidase (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) diluted in PBS/1% BSA was added, after washing with PBS/Tween, and incubated for 1 h. The assay was developed with 1% 3,5,3',5'-tetramethyl-benzidine in 0.11 M Na-acetate (pH 5.5; 100 µg/ml) containing 0.1% freshly added H2O2. The reaction was stopped after 10 min with 50 µl of 2 M H2SO4. OD450 was determined as a measure for the amount of deposited C3.

Flow Cytometry.
CC531 cells (2.5 x 105) were incubated with mAbs in 100 µl of PBS, containing 1% BSA (fraction V; Sigma, St. Louis, MO; PBS/BSA,) for 30 min on ice. After washing the cells twice with PBS/BSA, 100 µl of syngeneic normal rat serum (10% v/v; final dilution) in RPMI 1640 were added as a source of complement and the cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C. To analyze the binding of IgG or C3 deposition, the cells were washed twice with PBS/BSA and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat antimouse IgG or FITC-conjugated goat antirat C3, respectively (30 min on ice). After washing, propidium iodide (1 µg/ml) was added to visualize dead cells. Ten thousand living cells were examined using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). The average amount of C3 deposition was determined from all living cells. Fluorescence compensation was used to correct for spectral cross-talk between fluorescent signals. Data are expressed as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome values, to compare individual experiments independent from flow cytometer settings (22 , 23) . To calculate molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome values a flow cytometry standardization kit, Quantum 25 FITC beads (Flow Cytometry Standards Europe, Leiden, The Netherlands) were measured with each experiment for calibration of FL1 measurements.

Hemolytic Activity.
The hemolytic activity (CH50) was determined by measuring the serum concentration and thus the activity of classical complement pathway to achieve a 50% reduction in lysis of sheep erythrocytes opsonized with rabbit Ab. This was achieved by using 100 µl (5 x 108/ml) of sheep erythrocytes coated with rabbit antigoat Ab and 100 µl of a 1/100 dilution of serum of treated rats, both diluted in D-glucose gelatin veronal buffer containing 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.15 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 M Mg-EGTA (pH 7). After addition of 1.5 ml of PBS and centrifugation for 7 min at 2,000 rpm, the amount of released hemoglobin was measured at A412.

Animal Experiments.
Male WAG/Rij rats, a Wistar-derived inbred strain, were purchased from Charles River (Schutzfeld, Germany) and used at an average weight of 230 g. The animals had free access to standard food pellets and water. Animal experiment protocols were approved by the local university animal ethical committee. Tumor cells were harvested with a solution of 0.1% (w/v) EDTA and 0.25% (w/v) trypsin in Hanks’ buffered salt solution. After washing twice in PBS, 30 x 106 cells were incubated with 4 ml of PBS containing either mAb (150 µg/100 pmol), F(ab)2 (100 µg/100 pmol), bi-mAb (400 µg/269 pmol), or mAb conjugate (300 µg/100 pmol) for 1 h at 4°C. The ratio of mAbs and cells was comparable with the flow cytometry protocol. After incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS, adjusted to a concentration of 20 x 106 cells/ml, and kept in suspension on ice until use while occasionally shaking. Rats were anesthetized with halothane, and 200 µl of tumor cell suspension, containing 4 x 106 cells, were injected into the penile vein. In the prophylactic experiment, rats at t = –6 h received injections i.p. of 300 µg (200 pmol) of bi-mAb or 150 µg (100 pmol) of MG4 (amounts corrected for comparable binding sites to MG4) in 500 µl PBS. At t = 0 h, 4 x 106 tumor cells were injected in the penile vein. At t = 6 h, a second comparable dose of mAb was administered. Blood was drawn from the tail vein at t = 0 and t = 18 to collect peripheral blood lymphocytes and serum. At day 21, rats were sacrificed by abdominal bleeding under halothane anesthesia. Lungs received injections of 15% Indian ink (Royal Talens, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands) in water via the trachea until completely filled. Lungs were removed, washed for 5 min in water, and fixed in Fekete’s solution containing 60% ethanol, 9% formaldehyde solution (4%), and 4.5% acetic acid (24) . After 24 h of fixation, lungs were rinsed and stored in water. All macroscopically visible tumors on the lung surface were counted for each pair of lungs by an observer blinded for the treatment of the tumor cells or rats. The number of metastases was previously shown to correlate well with the total number of tumors present in the lungs (24 , 25) . Each experiment consisted of five rats per group and was repeated three or four times (total n = 12–17/group in total). For the therapeutic experiment, n = 6 rats/group. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test. Two of seven bi-mAb-injected rats were sacrificed 2 days after mAb injection to investigate biodistribution of the bi-mAb. Sections of liver, lung, colon, and skin were stained with goat antimouse-FITC, and staining levels were analyzed by confocal microscopy as described before (11) .

Statistical Analysis.
Data are given as group means ± SD. Differences in group means were tested for significance using Mann-Whitney U test, considering P < 0.05 significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Complement-Activating Capacities of MG42a, MG42a-CVF, and MG42a*5I2.
With a complement activation ELISA, the complement-activating capacities of MG42a and MG42a-CVF were compared by detecting the amount of deposited C3. The amount of C3 deposition induced by MG42a-CVF was approximately 10 times higher compared with unconjugated MG42a (Fig. 1A)Citation . Using flow cytometry, opsonization with MG42a-CVF increased the amount of C3 deposition on CC531 cells by 100% compared with MG42a. The amount of C3 deposition induced by MG42a-CVF could still be increased another 300% compared with MG42a-CVF by simultaneously blocking Crry with 5I2 F(ab)2 fragments, indicating the important role of Crry in controlling complement activation at the cell surface (Fig. 1B)Citation .



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Complement-activating capacities of MG42a, MG42a-CVF, and MG42a*5I2. A, to compare the complement-activating capacities of MG42a and MG42a-CVF, a complement activation ELISA was performed. MG42a or MG42a-CVF was coated, WAG/Rij rat serum was added as a source of complement in different concentrations (X axis), and the amount of deposited C3 was detected as a measure for the amount of activated complement. The amount of C3 deposition is depicted on the Y axis and expressed in arbitrary units (AU). MG42a-CVF ({blacksquare}) was more efficient in complement activation compared with MG42a ({square}). A representative experiment is shown. B, C3 deposition on CC531 cells due to bi-mAb and mAb-CVF conjugates. CC531 cells were incubated with the different mAbs as depicted on the X axis. 10% WAG/Rij rat serum in RPMI++ was added as a source of complement. The amount of deposited C3 was detected with goat antirat-C3-FITC and quantified by flow cytometry. The amount of C3 deposition is expressed in molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) values to correct for interexperimental differences in settings and depicted on the Y axis. Y-axes values multiplied with 104 render actual values. The value of the control (no primary mAb) was subtracted from the presented values. Means ± SD of four independent experiments are shown. C, Both bi-mAb MG42a*5I2 and MG42a*CC52 migrate exactly in between their parental mAbs on SDS-PAGE, indicating that they consist of mixed IgG1 and IgG2a Fc tails and thus are bi-isotypic. Neither of the bi-mAb isolations were contaminated with parental mAb.

 
Next, a comparison was made between the amount of C3 deposition on CC531 cells induced by bi-mAb MG42a*5I2, by the parental MG42a mAb combined with 5I2 F(ab)2, and by MG42a mAb alone (Fig. 1B)Citation . MG42a*5I2 and the two parental mAbs [MG42a and 5I2 F(ab)2] were similar in their complement-activating capacities as measured by flow cytometry. F(ab)2 of 5I2 were used, because the Fc part of 5I2 could, despite its IgG1 isotype, activate the rat complement system via the classical pathway (Ref. 26 ; data not shown). That the beneficial effect of bi-mAb or MG4 + 5I2 was dependent on the complement-activating MG4 antitumor arm was supported by the observation that 5I2 F(ab)2 in combination with non-complement-activating MG4 IgG1 did not increase C3 deposition compared with MG42a alone. C3 deposition induced by bi-mAb or by both parental mAbs [MG4 IgG2a + 5I2 F(ab)2], however, was significantly higher compared with MG42a alone (Fig. 1BCitation , P = 0.05).

To investigate whether the observed increase in C3 deposition was due to blocking of Crry and not the effect of a higher number of Fc tails or a higher efficiency to activate complement of the mixed IgG1/2a Fc tail, a control bi-mAb directed against the MG42a and CC52 antigens was developed. CC52 is an antigen expressed on CC531 cells, with expression levels comparable with Crry (18) . Opsonization of CC531 with MG42a*CC52 resulted in comparable amounts of C3 deposition as opsonization with MG42a (Fig. 1B)Citation , indicating that the high level of C3 deposition induced by MG42a*5I2 was indeed due to the inhibition of Crry. In addition to its functional capacity, bi-isotypicity and purity of the bi-isotypic mAb was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1C)Citation .

Effect of Modulating mCRP on Outgrowth of Lung Tumors.
Subsequently, the effect of modulating Crry on mAb-mediated immunotherapy was investigated in a syngeneic rat colorectal cancer lung metastases model. CC531 cells were preincubated with MG42a, bi-mAb MG42a*5I2, or MG42a-CVF conjugates and injected i.v. in rats (Fig. 2)Citation . As a reference, PBS-incubated CC531 tumor cells were injected, resulting in outgrowth of 291 tumors on average at the lung surface. Tumor cells preincubated with MG42a resulted in 175 lung surface tumors on average, which was not significantly different from the PBS group (Mann-Whitney, P = 0.18). Blocking Crry with bi-mAb MG42a*5I2 completely blocked tumor outgrowth in 33% of the rats over all experiments. In these animals, no tumors could be found on the lung surface or inside the lungs. In the other animals, only a few tumors were observed (ranging from 1 to 7 lung surface tumors). This was significantly less compared with the outgrowth of MG42a-incubated tumor cells (P = 0.008). Treatment with MG42a-CVF also resulted in a significantly reduced number of tumors at the lung surface (44 on average) compared with MG42a (P = 0.014), although treatment with bi-mAb was significantly more effective (P = 0.013). No visible tumors were found in other organs than the lungs.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Influence of different therapeutic mAb on outgrowth of lung tumors. To investigate the effect of inhibiting or blocking Crry on tumor cells in vivo, tumor cells were opsonized with different therapeutic mAb (X axis) and injected i.v. in syngeneic rats. The number of outgrowing surface lung tumors (Y axis) is a measure for the effectiveness of the therapeutic effect of mAb. Injection of MG42a*5I2 or MG42a-CVF preincubated tumor cells resulted in significantly less surface tumors compared with MG2a (Mann-Whitney; *, P = 0.008, and **, P = 0.014, respectively). The results of a representative experiment are shown. Each bar represents the average number of lung surface tumors of five rats ± SD.

 
Subsequently, the nature of this noteworthy reduction in the number of lung tumors induced by MG42a*5I2 was investigated. It was determined whether the effect of MG42a*5I2 was indeed caused by inhibition of Crry. Blocking Crry with 5I2 F(ab)2 resulted in outgrowth of 110 tumors on average (Fig. 3)Citation , indicating that the MG4-binding part of the bi-mAb is essential for an optimal reduction of the number of metastases. Tumor cells incubated with control CC52 F(ab)2 induced 344 tumors on average, which was significantly more (P = 0.009). The latter number was comparable with the PBS control group (353 tumors on average; P = 0.917), suggesting that inhibition of Crry was also responsible for the observed effect, probably by allowing unhampered activation via the alternative pathway tick-over mechanism. Injection of CC531 cells incubated with both the parental mAbs [MG42a and 5I2 F(ab)2] resulted in outgrowth of 70 surface tumors, a significantly higher number compared with bi-mAb (P = 0.013), implicating a synergistic effect of bi-mAb compared with both of the parental mAbs (Fig. 3)Citation .



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of control bi-mAb and F(ab)2 on outgrowth of lung tumors. Tumor cells were opsonized with different therapeutic or control mAb (X axis) and injected i.v. in syngeneic rats. The number of outgrowing surface lung tumors (Y axis) is a measure for the effectiveness of the therapeutic effect of the mAb. To investigate whether the effect of MG42a*5I2 mAb was due to the inhibition of Crry, the previous experiments were repeated with a control bi-mAb MG42a*CC52, directed against an irrelevant antigen. The effect of this control bi-mAb was comparable with that of MG42a alone, indicating that the observed effect was indeed mediated by inhibition of Crry. To check whether the observed effect was complement dependent and not an independent effect mediated by mAb binding to Crry, 5I2 F(ab)2 fragments were used, resulting in a decrease in tumors. Control F(ab)2 did not exert this effect, indicating that the effect was not due to the fact that F(ab)2 fragments were used. The results of a representative experiment are shown. Each bar represents the average number of surface lung tumors from five rats ± SD.

 
Furthermore, to control for increased complement activation due to a higher number of Fc tails or more efficient ADCC of MG42a*5I2-opsonized cells, the control bi-mAb MG42a*CC52 was used. The effect of opsonization with MG42a*CC52 on tumor outgrowth was compared with MG42a*5I2 (Fig. 3)Citation . The number of tumors observed after treatment with MG42a*5I2 (6 on average in this particular experiment) was significantly less (P = 0.014) than the number of tumors induced by MG42a*CC52-treated tumor cells (244 tumors on average). The latter number was comparable with the number of tumors on the lungs of rats that received injections of MG42a-incubated cells (228 tumors on average; P = 0.602). These experiments demonstrate that the effect of bi-mAb MG42a*5I2 was indeed due to its inhibitory effect on Crry function.

Effect of Prophylactic Therapy with bi-mAb.
Because MG42a*5I2 was most effective in inhibiting outgrowth of metastases compared with MG4-CVF, the effect of this bi-mAb on tumor outgrowth was further investigated. Clinical mAb therapy in patients will probably be most successful in an adjuvant setting (25 , 27) ; for this reason, a prophylactic experiment was performed. Rats received injections of MG42a*5I2 (300 µg/200 pmol), MG42a*CC52 (300 µg/200 pmol), MG42a (150 µg/100 pmol; equal number of MG4-binding sites between bi-mAb and mAb), or PBS 6 h before tumor cell injection and received injections of a similar dose 6 h after tumor cell injection. Control mAbs only binding to Crry [e.g., 5I2 F(ab)2] were not injected, because they were previously shown to evoke severe side effects or death when injected systemically. After 3 weeks, rats were sacrificed, and the number of metastases was counted. Similar results were obtained as observed in the preincubation experiments (Fig. 4)Citation . Injection of MG42a*5I2 i.p. did not visually affect the health of the rats and resulted in significantly less metastases than treatment with MG42a (18 versus 353 on average; P = 0.02). MG42a was less effective in this experimental set-up compared with the preincubation experiments. This resulted in comparable numbers of metastases in the MG42a group compared with the PBS-injected group (353 versus 487; P = 0.368). Although MG42a*CC52 showed a trend to be more effective than MG42a in preventing outgrowth (175 versus 353 tumors), the difference in the number of surface tumors was not significant (P = 0.053).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Influence of prophylactic therapy with MG42a*5I2 on outgrowth of lung tumors. Rats received injections of mAb or bi-mAb 6 h before and 6 h after tumor cell injection. The number of outgrowing surface lung tumors (Y axis) is a measure for the effectiveness of the therapeutic effect of mAb. Injection of MG42a*5I2 resulted in significantly less surface tumors compared with MG2a (Mann-Whitney; *, P = 0.02). Control bi-mAb MG42a*CC52 did not result in significantly less numbers compared with MG42a (P = 0.053) in contrast compared with MG42a*5I2 (**, P = 0.006). Each bar represents the average number of lung surface tumors of five or six rats ± SD.

 
Although no adverse effect after prophylactic treatment with MG42a*5I2 was observed as has been described for injecting 5I2, the Crry-recognizing arm may also bind to normal cells. Therefore, the biodistribution of MG42a*5I2 was investigated. Six h after the first injection, at t = 0, no MG42a*5I2 could be detected in the serum by ELISA. In contrast, MG42a and low levels of MG42a*CC52 (Fig. 5, A and B)Citation were readily detectable. Twelve h after the last mAb injection (t = 18 h), all mAbs could be detected in the serum at comparable levels (Fig. 5, A and B)Citation . In addition, binding to host tissues was investigated. Two days after injection, binding of bi-mAb could be demonstrated to liver endothelium (Fig. 5D)Citation . No binding was observed on lung, kidney, and skin tissue (data not shown). In the intestine, only infiltrating immune cells were observed to bind MG42a*5I2. Also, peripheral blood lymphocytes were shown to be positive for MG42a*5I2 by flow cytometry (data not shown). Biodistribution of MG42a has been described previously (11 , 18) . MG4 was only shown to weakly bind to cells of the epithelial crypts in the intestine. To investigate whether injection of tumor cells in MG42a*5I2-injected rats or binding of MG42a*5I2 to host tissue caused complement activation, a CH50 of the serum of these rats at t = 0 h and t = 18 h was performed (Fig. 5C)Citation . In contrast to rats that received injections of MG42a or MG42a*CC52, the hemolytic activity of the serum of MG42a*5I2-injected rats was shown to be decreased 18 h after tumor cell injection. These results show that i.p. injection of MG42a*5I2 followed by injection of tumor cells results in complement activation, suggesting that the mechanism by which MG42a*5I2 eradicates tumor cells is indeed mediated via complement activation and inhibition of Crry.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Biodistribution and complement consumption of injected mAbs. Rats received injections of with mAb or bi-mAb 6 h before and 6 h after tumor cell injection. At tumor cell injection as well as 12 h after the last mAb injection, blood was drawn, and the presence of mouse IgG was detected by IgG2a sandwich ELISA (A; PBS and MG4 rat) or bi-isotypic ELISA (B; MG42a*5I2 and MG42a*CC52) as described in "Materials and Methods." The effect of injection of mAb and tumor cells on complement activation was determined by measuring the hemolytic activity of the sera from the treated rats as described in "Materials and Methods." C, a representative experiment. Binding of bi-mAb to normal tissue was determined with confocal microscopy. Sections were stained with goat antimouse IgG/M-FITC and investigated by confocal microscopy. Liver endothelium of MG42a*5I2-treated rats was shown to be positive for mouse IgG 2 days after injection (D; {square}, 50 µm), in contrast to liver endothelium of MG42a-injected rats (inset). Data of representative experiments are shown.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Because of the species restriction of mCRP, it is important to use an animal model syngeneic for mCRP and complement to study the effect of mCRP on tumor outgrowth. The role of mCRP expression on tumor outgrowth in a syngeneic model is only described in a few studies. An increase in tumor outgrowth of human breast cancer cells transfected with rat Crry was observed in nude rats, whereas transfection with rat CD59 did not result in comparable effects, showing the protective effect of Crry expression (12) . Similar results were obtained in a study in which syngeneic hepatoma cells, expressing high levels of Crry, were injected in rats. These rats showed a lower survival rate compared with rats that received injections of cells expressing low levels of Crry (13) . These data show the important role of expression of Crry on tumor growth in vivo in rats.

Because an important immune effector mechanism of therapeutic anticancer mAb is activation of the complement system, leading to direct lysis and complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, expression of mCRP on tumors is likely to inhibit therapeutic effects. This has previously been confirmed in vitro (3 , 14 , 28) . Predominantly mouse xenograft models have been used in the past to evaluate the effect of immunotherapeutic mAb in vivo, leading to an overestimation of the effect (5 , 29) . Previously, we have described a syngeneic rat colorectal cancer model to study the role of mCRP expression on tumor cells on mAb-mediated immunotherapy (11) . In that study, it was shown that Crry was the most important mCRP on CC531 cells when determining complement activation in vitro, induced by MG42a. When MG42a mAbs were injected in rats, bearing established CC531 liver tumors, no C3 deposition could be observed on these tumor cells in vivo (11) . This suggests that mCRP indeed inhibit complement activation of therapeutic mAbs in vivo. In the present study, we have expanded these previous observations by showing that Crry on these tumor cells prevents efficient eradication of mAb-opsonized tumor cells in vivo. Therefore it is important to inhibit or overcome the function of Crry in vivo to increase the effect of mAb-mediated immunotherapy. Previously, it has been shown that systemic complement activation after injection of mAb that inhibit Crry led to severe side effects in these rats (13 , 30) . This observation demonstrated the necessity to inhibit or overwhelm Crry in a tumor-restricted fashion (4) . This can be achieved either by using bi-mAb, directed against a tumor antigen and Crry or mAb-CVF conjugates. In vitro, opsonization of either human renal cell carcinoma or colorectal carcinoma cells with the appropriate bi-mAb (G250*anti-CD55 and anti-Ep-CAM*anti-CD55, respectively) mediated up to four times the amount of C3 deposition on these cells compared with a monospecific antitumor mAb (14 , 16) . Also, opsonization of colorectal cancer cells or neuroblastoma cells with anti-Ep-CAM-CVF and anti-GD2-CVF conjugates, respectively, resulted in vitro in increased amounts of complement activation compared with the unconjugated mAb (14 , 17) . In accordance with these in vitro studies, in the present study, it was demonstrated that in vivo inhibition of a major membrane-bound C3 regulatory protein (Crry) on tumor cells using either MG42a-CVF or bi-mAb MG42a*5I2 also substantially improved the outcome of immunotherapy compared with single mAb therapy.

The experimental conditions of this proof-of-principle study, using preincubation of the tumor cells, allowed an accurate determination of the effect of bi-mAb on tumor outgrowth. It was demonstrated that preincubation of CC531 cells with MG42a*5I2 bi-mAb could prevent tumor outgrowth, in contrast to control bi-mAb directed against MG42a and an irrelevant antigen in this model. However, under these experimental conditions no cross-reactivity of bi-mAb with Crry expressed on normal cells could occur. Because it was previously shown that injection of 1 mg of 5I2 led to 50% mortality in 4–8 h (13) , we also have investigated the effect of prophylactic treatment with MG42a*5I2. In contrast to the harmful effects of monospecific anti-Crry mAb or F(ab)2, MG4*5I2 was shown to be safe when injected i.p. in rats. The pharmacokinetics of bi-mAb were slower compared with MG4 parental mAb because bi-mAb binds to Crry on normal cells, in contrast to MG4. Despite binding to endothelium and blood cells, reflected by this undetectable serum concentration at t = 0 h of the bi-mAb, rats did not show any adverse consequences of this treatment, which supports the potential immunotherapeutic applicability of appropriate bi-mAb. The significant decrease in tumor outgrowth indicates that Crry can indeed be inhibited in a tumor-specific fashion with bi-mAb directed against a tumor antigen and a mCRP. We previously observed similar homing capacities and patterns of MG42a*5I2 compared with the parental MG42a mAb in a syngeneic solid liver tumor model, which supports an important role for the antitumor arm in accumulating the bi-mAb at the tumor cell surface and suggests potential applicability in a solid tumor model (data not shown; Ref. 11 ). Injection of MG42a-CVF in the syngeneic lung metastases model did not lead to detectable side effects, although bi-mAbs were more effective in complement activation in vitro and in reducing the number of outgrowing metastases in vivo compared with the mAb-CVF conjugates.

In a clinical setting, it might be expected that an anti-CVF response will be generated (31) , which can hamper the therapeutic effect on the long term. This problem may be circumvented by conjugation of a factor I-insensitive active part of C3b to the antitumor mAb (32) . Less immunogenicity can, however, be expected of bi-mAb compared with mAb-CVF. These arguments imply that inhibition of mCRP using bi-mAb will be the preferable immunotherapeutic approach. Ideally for clinical use, the tumor antigen-recognizing arm should be of high affinity, and the mCRP blocking arm should be of low affinity to maximize tumor specificity and minimize a systemic cross-reactivity and thus avoid complement-mediated toxicity (15) .

In conclusion, with this proof-of-principle study, which is to our knowledge the first in vivo study in a model syngeneic for mCRP and complement investigating the effect of a membrane-bound C3 regulatory protein (Crry) on mAb-mediated immunotherapy, we show that tumor-specific inhibition of Crry with bi-mAb or overwhelming the function of Crry with antitumor mAb-CVF conjugates (albeit to a lesser degree) is much more efficient in tumor eradication than conventional mAb immunotherapy in this colorectal cancer lung metastases model. Bi-mAbs, blocking the most important C3 regulatory protein specifically on tumor cells, are a promising approach to increase the clinical outcome of mAb-mediated immunotherapy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank L. A. Trouw and M. M. Koudijs for assistance with the animal experiments and J. D. H. van Eendenburg for the development of the bi-mAbs.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Dutch Cancer Society Grant 99032.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Arko Gorter, Department of Pathology, L1-Q, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-71-526-6631; Fax: 31-71-5248158; E-mail: A.Gorter{at}lumc.nl

Received 7/16/03. Revised 2/18/04. Accepted 4/ 7/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gelderman KA, Blok VT, Fleuren GJ, Gorter A The inhibitory effect of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on complement activation after immunotherapeutic treatment of cervical carcinoma cells with monoclonal antibodies or bispecific monoclonal antibodies. Lab Invest, 82: 483-93, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Li L, Spendlove I, Morgan J, Durrant LG CD55 is over-expressed in the tumour environment. Br J Cancer, 84: 80-6, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Niehans GA, Cherwitz DL, Staley NA, Knapp DJ, Dalmasso AP Human carcinomas variably express the complement inhibitory proteins CD46 (membrane cofactor protein), CD55 (decay-accelerating factor), and CD59 (protectin). Am J Pathol, 149: 129-42, 1996.[Abstract]
  4. Gorter A, Meri S Immune evasion of tumor cells using membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins. Immunol Today, 20: 576-82, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Carter P Improving the efficacy of antibody-based cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer, 1: 118-29, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Shin ML, Hansch G, Hu VW, Nicholson-Weller A Membrane factors responsible for homologous species restriction of complement-mediated lysis: evidence for a factor other than DAF operating at the stage of C8 and C9. J Immunol, 136: 1777-82, 1986.[Abstract]
  7. Zhang HF, Yu JH, Chen SH, Morgan BP, Abagyan R, Tomlinson S Identification of the individual residues that determine human CD59 species selective activity. J Biol Chem, 274: 10969-74, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Liszewski MK, Farries TC, Lublin DM, Rooney IA, Atkinson JP Control of the complement system. Adv Immunol, 61: 201-83, 1996.[Medline]
  9. Ross GD Regulation of the adhesion versus cytotoxic functions of the Mac-1/CR3/{alpha}Mß2-integrin glycoprotein. Crit Rev Immunol, 20: 197-222, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Takizawa H, Okada N, Okada H Complement inhibitor of rat cell membrane resembling mouse Crry/p65. J Immunol, 152: 3032-8, 1994.[Abstract]
  11. Gelderman KA, Hakulinen J, Hagenaars M, Kuppen PJ, Meri S, Gorter A Membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins inhibit complement activation by an immunotherapeutic mAb in a syngeneic rat colorectal cancer model. Mol Immunol, 40: 13-23, 2003.[Medline]
  12. Caragine TA, Okada N, Frey AB, Tomlinson S A tumor-expressed inhibitor of the early but not late complement lytic pathway enhances tumor growth in a rat model of human breast cancer. Cancer Res, 62: 1110-5, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Baranyi L, Baranji K, Takizawa H, Okada N, Okada H Cell-surface bound complement regulatory activity is necessary for the in vivo survival of KDH-8 rat hepatoma. Immunology, 82: 522-8, 1994.[Medline]
  14. Gelderman KA, Kuppen PJ, Bruin W, Fleuren GJ, Gorter A Enhancement of the complement activating capacity of 17–1A mAb to overcome the effect of membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins on colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Immunol, 32: 128-35, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Harris CL, Kan KS, Stevenson GT, Morgan BP Tumour cell killing using chemically engineered antibody constructs specific for tumour cells and the complement inhibitor CD59. Clin Exp Immunol, 107: 364-71, 1997.[Medline]
  16. Blok VT, Daha MR, Tijsma O, et al Bispecific monoclonal antibody directed against both the membrane-bound complement regulator CD55 and the renal tumor-associated antigen G250 enhances C3 deposition and tumor cell lysis by complement. J Immunol, 160: 3437-43, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Juhl H, Petrella EC, Cheung NK, Brede horst R, Vogel CW Additive cytotoxicity of different monoclonal antibody-cobra venom factor conjugates for human neuroblastoma cells. Immunobiology, 197: 444-59, 1997.[Medline]
  18. Hagenaars M, Koelemij R, Ensink NG, et al The development of novel mouse monoclonal antibodies against the CC531 rat colon adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis, 18: 281-9, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Sakurada C, Seno H, Dohi N, et al Molecular cloning of the rat complement regulatory protein, 5I2 antigen. Biochem Biophys Res Comm, 198: 819-26, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Parham P On the fragmentation of monoclonal IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b from BALB/c mice. J Immunol, 131: 2895-902, 1983.[Abstract]
  21. Marquet RL, Westbroek DL, Jeekel J Interferon treatment of a transplantable rat colon adenocarcinoma: importance of tumor site. Int J Cancer, 33: 689-92, 1984.[Medline]
  22. Bonsing BA, Corver WE, Gorsira MC, et al Specificity of seven monoclonal antibodies against p53 evaluated with Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and flow cytometry. Cytometry, 28: 11-24, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Vogt RF, Jr, Whitfield WE, Henderson LO, Hannon WH Fluorescence intensity calibration for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Methods, 21: 289-96, 2000.[Medline]
  24. Wexler H Accurate identification of experimental pulmonary metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst (Bethesda), 36: 641-5, 1966.
  25. Riethmuller G, Holz E, Schlimok G, et al Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes’ C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol, 16: 1788-94, 1998.[Abstract]
  26. Seino J, Eveleigh P, Warnaar S, Van Haarlem LJM, Van Es LA, Daha MR Activation of human complement by mouse and mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol, 94: 291-6, 1993.[Medline]
  27. Zhang H, Zhang S, Cheung NK, Ragupathi G, Livingston PO Antibodies against GD2 ganglioside can eradicate syngeneic cancer micrometastases. Cancer Res, 58: 2844-9, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gorter A, Blok VT, Haasnoot WHB, Ensink NG, Daha MR, Fleuren GJ Expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 an renal tumor cell lines and their role in preventing complemented-mediated tumor cell lysis. Lab Invest, 74: 1039-49, 1996.[Medline]
  29. Clynes RA, Takechi Y, Moroi Y, Houghton A, Ravetch JV Fc receptors are required in passive and active immunity to melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95: 652-6, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Matsuo S, Ichida S, Takizawa H, et al In vivo effects of monoclonal antibodies that functionally inhibit complement regulatory proteins in rats. J Exp Med, 180: 1619-27, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Taniguchi S, Kobayashi T, Neethling FA, et al Cobra venom factor stimulates anti-{alpha}-galactose antibody production in baboons: implications for pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Transplantation, 62: 678-81, 1996.[Medline]
  32. Fecke W, Farries TC, D’Cruz LG, Napper CM, Harrison RA Expression of factor I-resistant mutants of the human complement component C3 in heterologous systems. Xenotransplantation, 5: 29-34, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Roesli, B. Borgia, C. Schliemann, M. Gunthert, H. Wunderli-Allenspach, R. Giavazzi, and D. Neri
Comparative Analysis of the Membrane Proteome of Closely Related Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 69(13): 5406 - 5414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. C. Varela, M. Imai, C. Atkinson, R. Ohta, M. Rapisardo, and S. Tomlinson
Modulation of Protective T Cell Immunity by Complement Inhibitor Expression on Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6734 - 6742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Imai, R. Ohta, J. C. Varela, H. Song, and S. Tomlinson
Enhancement of Antibody-Dependent Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Lysis by a Targeted Activator of Complement
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9535 - 9541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Li, D. J. Allendorf, R. Hansen, J. Marroquin, D. E. Cramer, C. L. Harris, and J. Yan
Combined Yeast {beta}-Glucan and Antitumor Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Requires C5a-Mediated Neutrophil Chemotaxis via Regulation of Decay-Accelerating Factor CD55
Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7421 - 7430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelderman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelderman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online