| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
1 Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and 2 Coley Pharmaceutical Group, Wellesley, Massachusetts
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A new way to stimulate immune function was suggested by Tokunaga et al. (4) , who reported that immunostimulatory activity of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin resides in its DNA fraction and that this activity could be reproduced with synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs). Further studies demonstrated that unmethylated CpG motifs in bacterial DNA are responsible for these immunostimulatory effects (5) and are recognized by immune cells expressing a specific receptor, Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9; Ref. 6 ). In humans, only plasmacytoid dendritic cells and B cells express TLR9. By stimulating TLR9, CpG ODNs induce an activation phenotype in B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells characterized by expression of costimulatory molecules, enhanced antigen presentation to T cells, and secretion of T helper 1 (Th1)-promoting chemokines and cytokines (7) . Because CpG-induced antigen presentation occurs in a Th1-like cytokine milieu, it stimulates development of Th1 cells and can induce high levels of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, even in the absence of T-cell help (8) . Plasmacytoid dendritic cells secrete type I IFN, and CpG-activated B cells are strongly costimulated through their antigen receptor, selectively enhancing their secretion of antigen-specific antibodies (9 , 10) . Within hours, CpG-induced cytokines and chemokines trigger a wide range of secondary effects, such as natural killer cell and monocyte activation, which have antitumor activity.
Antitumor efficacy of CpG ODNs has been reported in a number of preventive and therapeutic tumor models (11, 12, 13, 14) . The efficacy of CpG ODN alone has been best demonstrated for small tumors, but CpG ODN also enhances cytotoxic therapy in advanced disease models (14) . No studies have yet reported on the ability of CpG ODNs to improve the efficacy of radiotherapy. Therefore, this study was designed to specifically assess whether CpG ODN enhances the effect of local tumor radiation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CpG ODN.
CpG ODN 1826 (sequence 5'-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT), previously shown to be a potent stimulator of mouse TLR9 and innate and adaptive immunity, and an inactive control CpG ODN 1982 (sequence 5'-TCCAGGACTTCTCTCAGGTT) were synthesized as described previously (13)
. The ODNs had no detectable endotoxin. Compounds were diluted with PBS to a concentration of 1 mg/ml and maintained at 4°C for up to 1 week. Injections were performed peritumorally in a volume of 0.1 ml to achieve a dose of 100 µg/mouse. CpG ODN 1826 was given to mice once tumors grew to 6 mm in diameter or three times, once tumors measured 6 mm, once they measured 8 mm, and again 7 days later.
Tumor Response to Radiation.
The effect of CpG ODN 1826 on tumor radioresponse was determined by tumor growth delay and TCD50 assay (radiation dose yielding 50% local tumor cure at 120 days). When tumors grew to 6 mm in diameter (range, 5.96.3 mm), mice were treated with active CpG ODN 1826. Control mice were untreated (tumor growth delay experiments) or treated with the inactive negative control CpG ODN 1982 (TCD50 experiment). When tumors grew to 8 mm in diameter (range, 7.68.4 mm), mice were given 20 Gy single dose
-radiation (tumor growth delay experiments) or a range of single doses (1055 Gy TCD50 experiment). Mice were given additional CpG ODN 1826 treatments at 3 h and 7 days after irradiation. For comparison, one group of mice in the tumor growth delay study was treated with only a single CpG ODN 1826 injection when the tumor reached 6 mm.
To obtain tumor growth curves, three orthogonal tumor diameters were measured at 13-day intervals with a vernier caliper, and the mean values were calculated. Regression and regrowth of tumors were documented until tumor diameter reached 14 mm. Tumor growth delay was expressed either as the absolute tumor growth delay (ATGD) or normalized tumor growth delay. ATGD was defined as time in days for tumors in the treatment arms to grow from 812 mm in diameter minus the time in days for tumors in the untreated group to reach the same size. Normalized tumor growth delay was defined as time for tumors treated with a combined regimen to grow from 812 mm minus the time to reach the same size in mice treated with CpG ODN 1826 alone.
In the TCD50 assay, mice were checked for presence of tumor in the irradiated leg at 27-day intervals after irradiation for up to 120 days. TCD50 was calculated using maximum likelihood analysis.
Whole-Body Irradiation (WBI).
Tumor growth in normal mice was compared with that in mice immunosuppressed with sublethal WBI (6 Gy) 1 day before tumor cell inoculation. If the response depended solely on the ability of the tumor host to mount an antitumor immune response, CpG ODN 1826 would be ineffective in immunocompromised mice. This approach was used in our earlier studies to suppress the effect of the host immune system on tumor response to radiation (15)
. WBI was delivered 1 day before tumor cell inoculation; treatment with three doses of CpG ODN 1826 was begun when tumors grew to 6 mm; and 20 Gy single-dose local tumor irradiation was given when tumors were 8 mm in diameter.
Histologic Analysis.
Tumor-bearing mice were killed by CO2 inhalation, and tumors were excised and placed in neutral buffered formalin. Fixed tumors were bisected along the midplane and embedded in paraffin, from which 4-µm sections were cut and stained with H&E. The percentage necrosis was determined with a Chalkey point counter using the method described by Milross et al. (16)
. Light-microscopic features used to identify necrosis included increased cell size, indistinct cell border, eosinophilic cytoplasm, loss or condensation of the nucleus, and associated inflammation.
Statistical Methods.
Statistical analysis of tumor growth delay was performed using the SPSS v. 11.0 (Chicago, IL) program. TCD50 was calculated using maximum likelihood analysis. Comparison of means was carried out by t test, and differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with a relatively weak effect on tumor growth when given as a single treatment, CpG ODN 1826 demonstrated a strong effect on radiation-induced tumor growth delay (Fig. 1)
. Tumor growth delay after the combined treatment was more than the sum of tumor growth delays caused by either irradiation or CpG ODN 1826. The efficacy of irradiation was enhanced similarly by one or three doses of CpG ODN 1826, the enhancement factors being 2.65 and 2.58, respectively. However, in addition to increasing tumor growth delay, three doses of CpG ODN 1826 combined with radiation cured three of seven tumors (43%), suggesting that multiple treatments with CpG ODN 1826 were superior to a single treatment.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CpG ODNs have been reported to be effective for tumor immunotherapy either alone or in combination with other therapies, including tumor vaccines, antitumor antibodies, chemotherapy, and other immunotherapies (14) . As monotherapy, they have worked best when injected intratumorally or peritumorally but showed little or no activity when injected at a distant site (12 , 14) . In other models, CpG ODNs have induced tumor regression even when injected systemically or at a distant site (11 , 13) . Weigel et al. (17) recently reported that systemic CpG ODNs enhance the antitumor effects of cyclophosphamide and topotecan and improve survival after surgical resection of murine rhabdomyosarcoma. Although neither cyclophosphamide nor CpG ODN alone was curative, combination treatment resulted in long-term survival of 1540% of mice.
Even in the absence of a vaccine, there is reason to hypothesize that CpG ODN induces an antigen-specific antitumor T-cell response. Injection of CpG ODN creates a Th1-like cytokine/chemokine milieu and lymphadenopathy in the draining lymph nodes (18)
. Among cells within the enlarging lymph nodes are large numbers of dendrite cells that express increased levels of costimulatory molecules and MHC, peaking at
710 days after injection (18)
. CpG ODN activation of dendrite cells promotes strong memory T-cell responses (14)
. CpG ODN-primed mice respond to subsequent antigen injection in the same anatomic region with a strong Th1-based response and high levels of cytotoxic T lymphocytes even several weeks after the CpG ODN injection (18)
. We hypothesize that when radiotherapy is given following CpG ODN injection, tumor antigens that are released from dying tumor cells are taken up and presented by activated dendrite cells, leading to the induction of a tumor-specific T-cell response. The curative efficacy of this combination therapy was lost in mice that had been rendered immunoincompetent by WBI, consistent with our hypothesized mechanism of action. WBI did not appear to eliminate the modest effect of CpG ODN monotherapy because these mice still showed some CpG ODN-induced tumor growth delay regardless of whether the tumor was irradiated. It is possible that this modest effect of CpG ODN alone results from activation of innate immune effector mechanisms, possibly less sensitive to WBI.
Earlier studies showed that the radioresponse of FSa tumors was strongly enhanced by treatment with corynebacteria (2 , 15 , 19) . Human clinical trials of C. parvum were initiated but showed a disappointing lack of efficacy (3) . The radioenhancing efficacy of CpG ODN in our current experiments is at least as high as that previously demonstrated for bacterial extracts. Early human clinical trials reveal that CpG ODN is well tolerated and highly immunostimulatory, even after repeated weekly dosing for >1 year (20) . On the basis of these results, pure chemical TLR9 agonist CpG ODNs are major milestones in rational immunomodulator development and are promising agents for additional clinical investigation in combination with radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to assess whether CpG ODNs enhance radioresponse of nonimmunogenic tumors and whether they affect radiation-induced normal tissue damage.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Luka Milas, Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology-66, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4095. Phone: 713-792-3263; Fax: 713-794-5369; E-mail: lmilas{at}mdanderson.org
Received 3/16/04. Revised 5/17/04. Accepted 6/ 4/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Damiano, S. Garofalo, R. Rosa, R. Bianco, R. Caputo, T. Gelardi, G. Merola, L. Racioppi, C. Garbi, E. R. Kandimalla, et al. A Novel Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Cooperates with Trastuzumab in Trastuzumab-Resistant Breast Tumors through Multiple Mechanisms of Action Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 15(22): 6921 - 6930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cerkovnik, B. Jezersek Novakovic, V. Stegel, and S. Novakovic Class C CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as a single agent and in combination with radiotherapy efficiently delayed growth of subcutaneous B16F1 tumors Innate Immunity, October 1, 2009; 15(5): 313 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quanz, N. Berthault, C. Roulin, M. Roy, A. Herbette, C. Agrario, C. Alberti, V. Josserand, J.-L. Coll, X. Sastre-Garau, et al. Small-Molecule Drugs Mimicking DNA Damage: A New Strategy for Sensitizing Tumors to Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1308 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zheng, N. Asprodites, A. H. Keene, P. Rodriguez, K. D. Brown, and E. Davila TLR9 engagement on CD4 T lymphocytes represses {gamma}-radiation-induced apoptosis through activation of checkpoint kinase response elements Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2704 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H.M.G.M. den Brok, R. P.M. Sutmuller, S. Nierkens, E. J. Bennink, L. W.J. Toonen, C. G. Figdor, T. J.M. Ruers, and G. J. Adema Synergy between In situ Cryoablation and TLR9 Stimulation Results in a Highly Effective In vivo Dendritic Cell Vaccine. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7285 - 7292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kim, M. Emi, K. Tanabe, and K. Arihiro Tumor-Driven Evolution of Immunosuppressive Networks during Malignant Progression Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5527 - 5536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Damiano, R. Caputo, R. Bianco, F. P. D'Armiento, A. Leonardi, S. De Placido, A. R. Bianco, S. Agrawal, F. Ciardiello, and G. Tortora Novel Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Induces Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Inhibition and Synergistic Antitumor Activity with EGFR Inhibitors Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pratesi, G. Petrangolini, M. Tortoreto, A. Addis, S. Belluco, A. Rossini, S. Selleri, C. Rumio, S. Menard, and A. Balsari Therapeutic Synergism of Gemcitabine and CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotides in an Orthotopic Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Xenograft Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 65(14): 6388 - 6393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Mason, H. Ariga, R. Neal, D. Valdecanas, N. Hunter, A. M. Krieg, J. K. Whisnant, and L. Milas Targeting Toll-like Receptor 9 with CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Enhances Tumor Response to Fractionated Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 361 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |