| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrinology |
Departments of 1 Urologic Surgery, 2 Cell Biology, and 3 Cancer Biology, 4 The Vanderbilt Prostate Cancer Center, 5 Center for Reproductive Biology Research, 6 Department of Pathology, and 7 The Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and 8 Department of Urologic Surgery and Andrology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuroendocrine (NE) cells are present in the normal and neoplastic prostate (1) . Increases in NE phenotype and secretory products are closely correlated with tumor progression and androgen independence in prostate cancer (2 , 3) . NE differentiation can be found in 10100% of prostate adenocarcinomas depending on the sample type (biopsy or prostatectomy specimen), method and extent of fixation, the antibody used, and the sensitivity of the technique applied (4) . Malignant neoplasia of the prostate with NE differentiation has poorer prognosis (35% survival rate in 2 years) compared with cases without it (97% survival rate in 2 years; Refs. 5 , 6 ). Histological studies reveal that NE cells are significantly more abundant in cancerous than in noncancerous tissues (7) . In fact, the overall abundance of NE cells increases in proportion to the progression of prostate cancer from the early stage to advanced, hormone-resistant disease (8) . Analyses of sera from hormone-dependent and clinically advanced, hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients show increased levels of NE cell markers such as chromogranin A (9, 10, 11) and neuron-specific enolase (12) . Although many studies have reported NE differentiation in prostate cancer, most of these are limited to immunohistochemical analyses. The role of NE cells in prostate cancer growth and their effect on prostate cancer after androgen ablation therapy remains to be investigated in detail.
We have established a NE allograft model from a 38-week-old LPB-Tag, 12T-10 transgenic mouse (13 , 14) . Ventral lobe prostatic tissue from a 12T-10 transgenic mouse that contained a NE prostate carcinoma was transplanted s.c. to an athymic male mouse. The established allograft was termed NE-10 (14) . To study the effect of NE cells on prostate cancer growth after androgen ablation therapy, we investigated the effects of NE-10 tumors on an LNCaP xenograft model.
We report that NE-10 tumors promoted LNCaP tumors to show increased AR expression and continued prostate cancer growth in the absence of testicular androgens. Also, NE secretions increased androgen-regulated promoter activity in LNCaP cells. Thus, the NE component of the developing prostate tumors appears to produce factors that regulate AR activity by enhancing sensitivity to lower circulating androgen levels in a ligand-dependent manner, increasing nuclear AR levels and/or directly activating the AR in a ligand-independent manner. Because an increase in AR level has been reported to be sufficient to account for hormone refractory prostate cancers (15 , 16) , the NE cell population ability to increase AR level/activity can be another mechanism that allows prostate cancer to escape androgen ablation therapy.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LNCaP with/without NE-10 Xenograft Model and Determination of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), Testosterone, and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Levels.
All of the animal studies were conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures outlined by the NIH guidelines and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. One-million LNCaP cells were inoculated s.c. with one-third volume of Matrigel (total injection volume was 50 µl; Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, NJ) in the right flank region of 6-week-old male athymic nude mice (BALB/c strain; Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN). After the primary LNCaP tumor reached 34 mm diameter (9 weeks), a small fragment (
50 mg) of NE tumor from the NE-10 allograft model was implanted s.c. into the opposite flank of the nude mice. Mice were separated into different groups. In the intact mice group (without castration), 8 mice with LNCaP tumors with or without NE tumor were studied. In the castrated group, 8 mice with LNCaP tumors with or without NE tumor were subsequently castrated via scrotal approach 2 weeks after NE tumor implantation.
Tumor volume was measured weekly and calculated by the formula: Volume = 0.523 x long diameter (mm)2 x short diameter (mm). Serum PSA, testosterone (T), and DHEA levels were determined by enzymatic immunoassay kit (PSA; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX) and radioimmunoassay kits (RIA; T and DHEA: Diagnostic Systems Laboratories), respectively, according to the manufacturers protocol. Data points were reported as mean value ± SD.
Mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after NE tumor implantation (2 weeks after castration). Blood samples were taken to determine the serum PSA, T, and DHEA levels. Two h before sacrifice, mice received i.p. injections of 10 µl/g 1:1000 diluted bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) labeling reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham) to determine the tumor cell proliferation rate. The LNCaP and NE tumor nodules were excised and either fixed in 10% buffered formalin and paraffin embedded for immunohistochemical analysis or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80°C for biochemical analysis.
Cell Proliferation.
Cell proliferation in tumors was determined using a Cell Proliferation kit (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham), which measures BrdUrd incorporation into cellular DNA. The paraffin-embedded blocks were cut into 4-µm sections and placed on microscope slides. Slides were deparaffinized by immersing in xylene twice for 10 min each and hydrated by immersing in a series of 100%, 70%, and 50% ethanol, and one time in dH2O for 5 min each. Slides were placed in urea buffer (pH 6.0) and microwaved for 20 min and cooled at room temperature for 1 h. Then, slides were washed in PBS (pH 7.4) for 5 min. To block endogenous peroxidase, slides were immersed in 0.3% H2O2 for 30 min then washed with PBS. Anti-BrdUrd primary antibody (mouse monoclonal, used at 1:500 dilution) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed in PBS; and antimouse IgG2 secondary antibody was added, incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and washed in PBS. One drop of 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride and substrate/intensifier mix prepared immediately before use was added to each slide, washed in dH2O, counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin, dehydrated, mounted, and analyzed by light microscope. Each tissue section was counted manually in four different areas to assess the BrdUrd-labeling index. The data were presented as percentage of BrdUrd labeling cells in 100 tumor cells.
Immunohistochemistry.
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections of the LNCaP xenograft were stained immunohistochemically with antibodies against PSA (clone LK2H10; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and androgen receptor (AR; clone N20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The primary antibody was incubated at the appropriate concentration (AR: 1:1000; PSA: 1:2000) for 1 h at room temperature. The secondary antibody was incubated for 30 min, being either horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit or goat antimouse (1:1000), respectively. Slides were rinsed extensively in tap water, counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin, and mounted.
Western Blot Analysis.
Tumors from mice carrying only the LNCaP were pooled together for protein extraction. Additionally, LNCaP tumors from mice also bearing the NE tumor group were pooled as a separate group for protein extraction. The two groups of pooled tissues were homogenized separately in lysis buffer (1 M Tris-Cl, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M EDTA, 0.7 mg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). A 20-µg aliquot of each protein sample was separated on a 412% Tris-glycine gradient gel (NOVEX) and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffer saline and 1% Tween 20 buffer. The AR or PSA antibodies were added at their optimal concentration (1:1000), and the blots were incubated for 1 h in room temperature. After washing three times for 10 min each in Tris-buffer saline and 1% Tween 20, incubation was performed for 1 h with the secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit and goat antimouse antibodies, respectively. The signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham).
Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and Real-Time PCR.
For quantification of PSA and AR mRNA expression levels in the LNCaP tumor, a real-time RT-PCR approach was used after reverse transcription of the isolated RNA. Tumors from the LNCaP alone group were pooled together for RNA extraction. Additionally, LNCaP tumors from mice also bearing the NE tumor were pooled together as a separate group for RNA extraction. Total RNAs were extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), and residual genomic DNA was removed by DNaseI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) treatment. The RNA was reverse transcribed using random primers and Superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturers protocol. The primers used for amplify AR were 5'-ATCAGGGGCGAAGTAGAGCATC-3' (forward), 5'-AGCCCCACTGAGGGGACAAC C-3' (reverse); for PSA were 5'-CTCTCGTGGCAGGGCAGTCT-3' (forward), 5'-GGTCGTGGCTGGAGTCATCA-3' (reverse); the 18S rRNA primers 5'-CAAGAACGAAAGTCGGAGGTTC-3' (forward), 5'-GGACATCTAAGGGCATCACA G-3' (reverse), were used as a control. Real-time PCR reactions were carried out in a 20-µl volume using a 96-well plate format, and fluorescence was detected using the Bio-Rad I-Cycler IQ real-time detection system.
Primary Culture of NE-10 Cells.
NE-10 tumor tissue was cut into 12 mm3 pieces. The small tissue fragments were placed into 100-mm Primaria tissue culture dishes (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ), cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 5% fetal bovine serum, 10% heat-inactivated horse serum, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Life Technologies, Inc.), 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies, Inc.), 1% L-glutamine, 1% sodium pyruvate, and 1 M HEPES at 37°C, in a 5% CO2 incubator. When the explants displayed an initial outgrowth of NE cells (usually 1 week after plating), the culture medium was changed every 2 days. Fibroblast cells that contaminated the cultured NE cells were removed by differential trypsinization.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide Assay.
All of the measurements were carried out in triplicate. LNCaP and PC-3 cells were plated in a 96-well plate (1 x 104/well). After 24 h, the cells were treated with conditioned medium (containing NE extracts). To generate the conditioned medium containing NE secretions, RPMI 1640 (containing 5% dextran charcoal-stripped serum; 0.1% insulin, transferrin, and selenium; and 0.1% glutamine) was added to the NE cell culture dish. After 24 h, the medium (containing NE secretions) was harvested and replaced to targeting cells (LNCaP and PC-3 cells). RPMI 1640 (containing 5% dextran charcoal-stripped serum; 0.1% insulin, transferrin, and selenium; and 0.1% glutamine) was added to the targeting cells as the control. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 108 M) and/or bicalutamide (105 M; Casodex; a gift from Zeneca Inc., Wilmington, DE) were added to both media. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (17)
was performed at 48 h after the cells that had been treated with conditioned medium. The experiments were repeated three times.
Transient Transfection Assay.
The ARR2PB-Luc (18)
vector (ARR2PB promoter is an androgen-responsive promoter) was used in the transfection experiments. LNCaP and PC-3 cells were plated at an initial density of 2.5 x 104/well in 24-well tissue culture plates. After 24 h, the cells were transfected with Lipofectamine (Life Technologies Inc.) for 4 h according to the manufacturers protocol. After transfection, the cells were treated with conditioned medium (as described above). Both conditioned and control medium were tested with a dose-response curve for DHT (1011 - 108 M) with or without bicalutamide (105 M). The transfection efficiency was determined by cotransfecting pRL-CMV containing the Renilla luciferase reporter gene (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Luciferase activity was determined using the Promega Corp. luciferase assay system at 24 h after transfection. The values plotted represent the mean of at least three individual samples ± SD.
Statistical and Image Analysis.
Where appropriate, experimental groups were compared using Students two-tailed t test, with significance defined as P < 0.05. For quantitation of immunoblot data, images were analyzed using Scion Image software, version 1.62 (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NE-10 Tumor Increases Expression of AR in LNCaP Xenograft.
LNCaP cell growth is androgen dependent. Increased proliferation as well as PSA expression is mediated through the AR. The Western blot analyses of LNCaP tumors grown in the presence of NE-10 tumors (castrated mice) showed (Fig. 5A)
that both AR and KFBP5.1, an AR regulated gene, were 2.45- and 3.18-fold higher, respectively, than that in the LNCaP tumors grown in the absence of NE-10 (Fig. 5B)
. Also, the real-time RT-PCR determined that AR expression in LNCaP tumors was 1.7-fold higher when the NE-10 tumor was present (Fig. 5C)
. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis suggests that AR staining was more intense in nuclei from LNCaP xenograft tissue in presence of NE-10 tumor compared with that when NE-10 tumors were absent (Fig. 4, C and D)
. Together, these findings suggest that the presence of NE-10 tumors stimulates LNCaP tumor growth, and increases AR expression, PSA expression, and PSA secretion in castrated mice.
NE-10 Cell Secretions Promote the Growth of LNCaP Cells in Vitro.
To test the hypothesis that NE-10 tumor secretions promote prostate cancer cell growth through AR, AR-positive LNCaP cells and AR-negative PC-3 cells were treated using conditioned culture medium containing NE cell secretions (see "Materials and Methods"). Our results demonstrated that, after 48 h of treatment, in the absence of androgen, the numbers LNCaP cells that cultured in with or without NE-10 cell secretion media decreased 35% and 38%, respectively, compared with the starting cell number. However, in the presence of androgen (108 M DHT), the number of LNCaP cells increased by 214% when NE-10 cells secretions were present and 141% when NE-10 cells secretions were absent compared with the starting cell number (Fig. 6A)
. The number of LNCaP cells that cultured in conditioned medium was significantly higher (P < 0.01; Students t test) than that of the cells cultured in medium without NE secretions in the presence of androgen. Furthermore, bicalutamide (105 M), an antiandrogen, blocked this effect (Fig. 6A)
. To additionally assess whether this response was due to the presence of AR, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was repeated in PC-3 cells, which do not express AR. As shown in Fig. 6B
, PC-3 cell growth rate did not change in any of the conditions tested. These results suggest that NE-10 cell secretions promote the growth of LNCaP cells based on the presence of androgen. Therefore, the effect of NE cells on the prostate cancer growth may be mediated through effects on the AR.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have suggested that NE differentiation in carcinoma of the prostate appears to be associated with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and the androgen-independent state. NE differentiation in androgen-independent tumors appears to increase when compared with androgen-dependent tumors, as determined by immunohistochemistry (19 , 20) , chromogranin A plasma levels, and chromogranin A gene expression (11 , 21) . It has been suggested that NE differentiation of prostate cancer cells can be induced by androgen withdrawal (22) . NE differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma is usually manifested as isolated foci or islands of cells expressing certain NE-related products (23) . Using double label techniques in human tissue, Bonkhoff et al. (5 , 6) reported that increased proliferation in exocrine cells surrounded NE tumor cells. Peptide growth factors and cytokines, operating either within the context of androgen-dependent signaling mechanisms or in an androgen-independent context, are likely to be critical to the process of prostate cancer progression. Our experiments demonstrated that NE tumors increased LNCaP tumor growth by secreting factors that can systemically act on a distant site.
AR is a major regulatory transcription factor in normal prostate growth and development and in the growth of androgen-dependent prostate cancer. In patients undergoing androgen ablation therapy, a role for AR-mediated gene activation in recurrent prostate cancer is supported by its expression together with the expression of androgen-regulated genes (24, 25, 26) . Our data strongly suggest that NE differentiation is an important mechanism by which prostate cancer can become "androgen refractory." This mechanism could work synergistically with other proposed mechanisms that activate AR-induced signaling pathways, such as AR reactivation in recurrent prostate cancer that include altered growth factor-induced phosphorylation (27, 28, 29, 30, 31) ; AR mutations (32) that broaden ligand specificity (33) ; AR gene amplification, which was observed after androgen deprivation in 30% of recurrent prostate cancers (34) ; and AR overexpression, which is associated with increased sensitivity to the growth-stimulating effects at low androgen concentrations in recurrent prostate cancer-derived cell lines (35 , 36) . Koh et al. (37) reported that adrenal steroids, such as DHEA, can be converted into DHT in LNCaP cells. Thus, it is possible that the weak adrenal steroids may work in concert with the NE secretions. Also, human prostate tissue can convert DHEA to active androgens (38) . In this study, we have demonstrated that in castrated mice, NE-10 tumors increased AR and AR-regulated gene expression in LNCaP xenografts with no detectable changes in serum androgen (T and DHEA) levels. Consistent with a recent report (15 , 16) , our data suggest that NE cells increased the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to the androgen by an increase of the AR levels. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the NE-10 graft also alters intratumor metabolism of DHEA to T by LNCaP cells.
To understand how the NE cells promote AR-induced transcription, we investigated the effects of NE secretions on ARR2PB, an androgen-responsive promoter. The results showed that NE secretions enhanced the ARR2PB activity, even in the presence of lower androgen levels (109 M, DHT) and this effect could be blocked by the antiandrogen bicalutamide. NE secretions, furthermore, stimulated the proliferation of prostate cancer cells in vitro in the presence of androgen, which could be blocked by bicalutamide. Taken together, these findings indicate that the effects of NE cells on prostate cancer growth are mediated through increased activity of functional AR. Therefore, yet to be defined neuropeptides may play an important role in promoting the transition of prostate cancer from an androgen-dependent to androgen-independent state during androgen-deprivation therapy.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Robert J. Matusik, Department of Urologic Surgery, A-1302 Medical Center North, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765. Phone: (615) 322-3172; Fax: (615) 322-8990; E-mail: robert.matusik{at}vanderbilt.edu
Received 10/ 6/03. Revised 4/16/04. Accepted 5/18/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. DaSilva, D. Gioeli, M. J. Weber, and S. J. Parsons The Neuroendocrine-Derived Peptide Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Promotes Prostate Cancer Cell Growth by Stabilizing the Androgen Receptor Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 69(18): 7402 - 7411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Loriot, C. Massard, M. Gross-Goupil, M. Di Palma, B. Escudier, A. Bossi, and K. Fizazi Combining carboplatin and etoposide in docetaxel-pretreated patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective study evaluating also neuroendocrine features Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 703 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Yang, J.-h. Ok, J. E. Busby, A. D. Borowsky, H.-J. Kung, and C. P. Evans Aberrant Activation of Androgen Receptor in a New Neuropeptide-Autocrine Model of Androgen-Insensitive Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 69(1): 151 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lai, S. A. Myers, M. G. Lawrence, D. M. Odorico, and J. A. Clements Direct Progesterone Receptor and Indirect Androgen Receptor Interactions with the Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 4 Gene Promoter in Breast and Prostate Cancer Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 7(1): 129 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Deng, H. Liu, J. Huang, L. Cheng, E. T. Keller, S. J. Parsons, and C.-D. Hu Ionizing Radiation Induces Prostate Cancer Neuroendocrine Differentiation through Interplay of CREB and ATF2: Implications for Disease Progression Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9663 - 9670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jin, Y. Lho, L. Connelly, Y. Wang, X. Yu, L. Saint Jean, T. C. Case, K. Ellwood-Yen, C. L. Sawyers, N. A. Bhowmick, et al. The Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway Controls the Progression of Prostate Cancer to Androgen-Independent Growth Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6762 - 6769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jin, Y. Lho, Y. Wang, M. Ao, M. P. Revelo, S. W. Hayward, M. L. Wills, S. K. Logan, P. Zhang, and R. J. Matusik Down-regulation of p57Kip2 Induces Prostate Cancer in the Mouse Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3601 - 3608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Frigo and D. P. McDonnell Differential effects of prostate cancer therapeutics on neuroendocrine transdifferentiation Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2008; 7(3): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Yuan, S. Veeramani, and M.-F. Lin Neuroendocrine-like prostate cancer cells: neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of prostate adenocarcinoma cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 531 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Deeble, M. E. Cox, H. F. Frierson Jr., R. A. Sikes, J. B. Palmer, R. J. Davidson, E. V. Casarez, G. P. Amorino, and S. J. Parsons Androgen-Independent Growth and Tumorigenesis of Prostate Cancer Cells Are Enhanced by the Presence of PKA-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Cells Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3663 - 3672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wu and J. Huang Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-AKT-Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway Is Essential for Neuroendocrine Differentiation of Prostate Cancer J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3571 - 3583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. B. Wetherill, J. K. Hess-Wilson, C. E.S. Comstock, S. A. Shah, C. R. Buncher, L. Sallans, P. A. Limbach, S. Schwemberger, G. F. Babcock, and K. E. Knudsen Bisphenol A facilitates bypass of androgen ablation therapy in prostate cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3181 - 3190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Filleur, K. Volz, T. Nelius, Y. Mirochnik, H. Huang, T. A. Zaichuk, M. S. Aymerich, S. P. Becerra, R. Yap, D. Veliceasa, et al. Two Functional Epitopes of Pigment Epithelial-Derived Factor Block Angiogenesis and Induce Differentiation in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5144 - 5152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, M.-W. Chen, S. Terry, F. Vacherot, D. K. Chopin, D. L. Bemis, J. Kitajewski, M. C. Benson, Y. Guo, and R. Buttyan A Human- and Male-Specific Protocadherin that Acts through the Wnt Signaling Pathway to Induce Neuroendocrine Transdifferentiation of Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5263 - 5271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |