Cancer Research Targets  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chintharlapalli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chintharlapalli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
[Cancer Research 64, 5994-6001, September 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes Induce Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Mediated Growth Inhibition, Transactivation, and Differentiation Markers in Colon Cancer Cells

Sudhakar Chintharlapalli1, Roger Smith, III2, Ismael Samudio3,4, Wei Zhang5 and Stephen Safe3,4

1 Departments of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2 Veterinary Pathobiology, and 3 Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; 4 Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; and 5 Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1,1-Bis(3'indolyl)-1–(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes containing p-trifluoromethyl (DIM-C-pPhCF3), p-t-butyl (DIM-C-pPhtBu), and p-phenyl (DIM-C-pPhC6H5) groups induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma})-mediated transactivation in HT-29, HCT-15, RKO, and SW480 colon cancer cell lines. Rosiglitazone also induces transactivation in these cell lines and inhibited growth of HT-29 cells, which express wild-type PPAR{gamma} but not HCT-15 cells, which express mutant (K422Q) PPAR{gamma}. In contrast, DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 inhibited growth of both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells with IC50 values ranging from 1 to 10 µmol/L. Rosiglitazone and diindolylmethane (DIM) analogues did not affect expression of cyclin D1, p21, or p27 protein levels or apoptosis in HCT-15 or HT-29 cells but induced keratin 18 in both cell lines. However, rosiglitazone induced caveolins 1 and 2 in HT-29 but not HCT-15 cells, whereas these differentiation markers were induced by DIM-C-pPhCF3 and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 in both cell lines. Because overexpression of caveolin 1 is known to suppress colon cancer cell and tumor growth, the growth inhibitory effects of rosiglitazone and the DIM compounds are associated with PPAR{gamma}-dependent induction of caveolins.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors and members of the nuclear receptor family (1, 2, 3) . Ligand-bound PPARs form nuclear heterodimers with retinoid X receptors, which modulate transcription by interactions with cognate PPAR response elements in target gene promoters. PPAR{gamma} has been extensively investigated and ligands for this receptor typically induce adipocyte differentiation and mediate tissue-specific anti-inflammatory responses. Synthetic thiazolidinediones (TZDs) such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are PPAR{gamma} agonists that have been developed for treatment of insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes (1, 2, 3, 4) .

Ikezoe et al. (5) reported expression of wild-type PPAR{gamma} mRNA in tumors from multiple tissues, including lung, breast, colon, prostate, osteosarcomas, acute myelogenous leukemia, adult T-cell leukemia, glioblastomas, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and myelodisplastic syndrome. In addition, PPAR{gamma} mRNA was also expressed in 71 different cancer cell lines derived from hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic (lung, duodenal, prostate, breast, glioblastomas, and colon) tumors. Surprisingly, the reported PPAR{gamma} mutations in colon cancer (6) were not observed in the 10 colon cancer cell lines and 58 clinical samples examined in this study.

Studies in this laboratory have characterized a series of 1,1-bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes [methylene or C-substituted diindolylmethanes (DIMs)] that activate PPAR{gamma}-dependent transactivation and inhibit growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells (7) . Compounds containing p-CF3 (DIM-C-pPhCF3), p-t-butyl (DIM-C-pPhtBu), and p-phenyl (DIM-C-pPhC6H5) were the most potent activators of PPAR{gamma} and inhibitors of cell growth. Growth inhibition by C-substituted DIMs in MCF-7 cells was associated, in part, with proteasome-dependent down-regulation of cyclin D1.

A recent study reported that several colon cancer cells expressed either wild-type or mutant PPAR{gamma} containing a point mutation at codon 422 (K422Q; ref. 8 ). HCT-15 and other cells that express mutant PPAR{gamma} were resistant to the growth inhibitory and differentiation-inducing effects of rosiglitazone, whereas these responses were induced by rosiglitazone in cells (e.g., HT-29) expressing wild-type PPAR{gamma}. Results of this study show that PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs induce PPAR{gamma}-dependent transactivation and differentiation-induced genes/proteins in both rosiglitazone-responsive (HT-29) and -nonresponsive (HCT-15) colon cancer cell lines. Caveolin 1 and caveolin 2 proteins were induced by rosiglitazone only in HT-29 cells, whereas C-substituted DIMs induced these proteins in both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells. The cell context-dependent growth inhibitory responses of rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs correlated with induction of caveolins, which exhibit tumor suppressor activity.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines and Reagents.
Human colon carcinoma cell lines RKO, DLD1, and SW480 were provided by M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; HT-29 and HCT-15 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). RKO, DLD1, SW480, and HT-29 cells were maintained in DMEM:Ham’s F-12 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with phenol red supplemented with 0.22% sodium bicarbonate, 0.011% sodium pyruvate, and 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10 mL/L of 100x antibiotic antimycotic solution (Sigma). HCT-15 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) supplemented with 0.22% sodium bicarbonate, 0.011% sodium pyruvate, 0.45% glucose, 0.24% HEPES, 10% FBS, and 10 mL/L of 100x Antibiotic Antimycotic solution (Sigma). Cells were maintained at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. Rosiglitazone was purchased from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (St. Paul, MN). Antibodies for PPAR{gamma} (sc-7273), Sp1 (sc-59), bcl-2, bax, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, cyclin D1 (sc-718), p21 (sc-756), p27 (sc-528), and caveolin 1 (sc-894) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Keratin-18 antibody was purchased from NeoMarkers (Fremont, CA). Caveolin 2 antibody was obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Reporter lysis buffer and luciferase reagent for luciferase studies were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). ß-Galactosidase (ß-Gal) reagent was obtained from Tropix (Bedford, MA). Lipofectamine reagent and Plus reagent were supplied by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Western Lightning chemiluminescence reagent were from Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). The C-substituted DIMs were prepared in this laboratory by condensation of indole with p-substituted benzaldehydes, and compounds were >95% pure by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Plasmids.
The Gal4 reporter containing 5x Gal4 response elements (pGal4) was kindly provided by Dr. Marty Mayo (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC). Gal4DBD-PPAR{gamma} construct (gPPAR{gamma}) was a gift of Dr. Jennifer L. Oberfield (Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC). The PPAR{gamma}-VP16 fusion plasmid (VP-PPAR{gamma}) contained the DEF region of PPAR{gamma} (amino acids 183–505) fused to the pVP16 expression vector and the GAL4-coactivator fusion plasmids pM-SRC1, pMSRC2, pMSRC3, pM-DRIP205, and pM-CARM-1 were kindly provided by Dr. Shigeaki Kato (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan).

Transfection and Luciferase Assay.
Colon cancer cells were plated in 12-well plates at 1 x 105 cells/well in DMEM:Ham’s F-12 media supplemented with 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS. After growth for 16 hours, various amounts of DNA, i.e., Gal4Luc (0.4 µg), ß-gal 0.04 µg), VP-PPAR{gamma} (0.04 µg), pM SRC1 (0.04 µg), pMSRC2 (0.04 µg), pMSRC3 (0.04 µg), pMDRIP205 (0.04 µg), and pMCARM-1 (0.04 µg) were transfected by Lipofectamine or Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After 5 hours of transfection, the transfection mix was replaced with complete media containing either vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated ligand for 20 to 22 hours. Cells were then lysed with 100 mL of 1x reporter lysis buffer, and 30 µL of cell extract were used for luciferase and ß-gal assays. Lumicount was used to quantitate luciferase and ß-gal activities, and the luciferase activities were normalized to ß-gal activity.

Cell Proliferation Assay.
Cells were plated at a density of 2 x 104/well in 12-well plates and replaced the next day with DMEM:Ham’s F-12 media containing 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS and either vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated ligand and concentration. Fresh media and compounds were added every 48 hours. Cells were counted at the indicated times using a Coulter Z1 cell counter. Each experiment was done in triplicate and results are expressed as means ± SE for each determination.

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis.
HT-29 and HCT-15 cells were synchronized in serum-free media for 3 days and then treated with either the vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated compounds for 24 hours. Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged, and resuspended in staining solution containing 50 µg/mL propidium iodide, 4 mmol/L sodium citrate, 30 units/mL RNase, and 0.1% Triton X-100. After incubation at 37°C for 10 minutes, sodium chloride was added to give a final concentration of 0.15 mol/L. Cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA), using CellQuest (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems) acquisition software. Propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence was collected through a 585/42-nm bandpass filter, and list mode data were acquired on a minimum of 20,000 single cells defined by a dot plot of PI width versus PI area. Data analysis was performed in ModFit LT (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME) using PI width versus PI area to exclude cell aggregates.

Western Blot Analysis.
HT-29 and HCT-15 cells were seeded in DMEM:Ham’s F-12 media containing 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS for 24 h and then treated with either the vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated compounds. For the apoptosis experiments, cells were treated for 72 h with various compounds. Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates was determined as described previously (7 , 9) . Band intensities were evaluated by scanning laser densitometry (Sharp Electronics Corporation, Mahwah, NJ) using Zero-D Scanalytics software (Scanalytics Corporation, Billerica, MA).

Statistical Analysis.
Statistical differences between different groups were determined by ANOVA and Scheffe’s test for significance. The data are presented as mean ± SD for at least three separate determinations for each treatment.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Inhibition of Colon Cancer Cell Growth by Rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-Active C-Substituted DIMs.
The effects of rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 on the growth of HT-29, HCT-15, SW480, and RKO colon cancer cells are summarized in Fig. 1Citation and Table 1Citation . The results obtained in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, which express wild-type and mutant (K422Q) PPAR{gamma} (8) , are illustrated in Fig. 1, A and BCitation . Rosiglitazone significantly inhibited growth of HT-29 cells at concentrations of 1, 5, and 10 µmol/L; however, the concentration required for IC50 was >10 µmol/L. In contrast, 1 µmol/L concentrations of DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited growth of HT-29 cells, and IC50 values were <5 µmol/L for all three compounds. Rosiglitazone did not inhibit proliferation of HCT-15 cells (8) ; the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs all significantly inhibited growth at 5 or 10 µmol/L concentrations, and IC50 values were <10 µmol/L. The results in Table 1Citation show that rosiglitazone treatment (1 to 10 µmol/L) minimally affected growth of SW480 or RKO cells, whereas IC50 values for the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs varied from 1 to 5 or 5 to 10 µmol/L with DIM-C-pPhCF3 as the most potent compound in both cell lines.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Growth inhibition studies. HT-29 (A) and HCT-15 (B) colon cancer cells were treated with 1 to 10 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 for 6 days, and cell numbers were determined using a Coulter Counter as described in the Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as means ± SE for three separate determinations at each time point.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Percentage inhibition of SW480 and RKO colon cancer cell growth (6 days) by rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs

 
HT-29 and HCT-15 cells were cultured in serum-free media for 3 days and then grown in 2.5% charcoal-stripped serum and treated with DMSO (solvent control), 10 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, or DIM-C-pPhC6H5. Three days after treatment, the percentage distribution of cells in G0-G1, S, and G2-M phases was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (Fig. 2)Citation . The PPAR{gamma} agonists decreased the percentage of HT-29 cells in S phase and increased the percentage in G0-G1. Rosiglitazone did not affect the percentage of HCT-15 cells in G0-G1, S, or G2-M phase of the cell cycle, and this was consistent with the failure of this compound to inhibit proliferation of this cell line (Fig. 1B)Citation . Surprisingly, 10 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhCF3 and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 also did not alter the percentage distribution of HCT-15 cells in G0-G1, S, or G2-M phase, although both compounds significantly inhibited growth of these cells (Fig. 1)Citation . Previous studies with HCT-15 cells showed that the PPAR{gamma} agonist BRL-49653 did not inhibit growth of these cells or block G0-G1->S-phase progression (10) .



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. HT-29 (A) and HCT-15 (B) cells were growth arrested for 3 days and then treated for 24 hours with 10 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, or DIM-C-pPhC6H5 and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis as described in the Materials and Methods. Results of a single experiment are presented and were also observed in two (HT-29) or three (HCT-15) separate studies.

 
PPAR{gamma}-Dependent Transactivation and Coactivator Interactions by Rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5.
PPAR{gamma} is expressed in SW480, RKO, HT-29, and HCT-15 cells (data not shown), and ligand-dependent activation of PPAR{gamma} in HCT-15 and HT-29 colon cancer was determined in cells transfected with chimeric PPAR{gamma}-GAL4 and a GAL4 response element plasmid (pGAL4) containing five tandem GAL4 response elements linked to a luciferase reporter gene (Fig. 3, A and B)Citation . Rosiglitazone (1 to 10 µmol/L) and 1 to 10 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 induced reporter gene activity in HCT-15 and HT-29 cells, and similar results were observed in RKO and SW480 cells (data not shown). The magnitude of the induction responses were <6-fold in the HCT-15 and HT-29 cells, and the relative potencies of the individual compounds were variable and dependent on cell context. DIM-C-pPhCH3 exhibited lower activity in the transactivation assays in the colon cancer cells as previously reported in breast cancer cell lines (7) . Results in Fig. 3, C and DCitation , show that induction of luciferase activity by rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells transfected with PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4 was inhibited by GW9662, a PPAR{gamma} antagonist. Results summarized in Fig. 3ECitation show that 7.5 µmol/L GW9662 also significantly blocks the growth inhibitory effects of 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhC6H5 in HCT-15 cells. In contrast, GW9662 alone was growth inhibitory in HT-29 cells. These data confirm the role of PPAR{gamma} in mediating inhibition of HCT-15 cell growth by DIM-C-pPhC6H5.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Ligand-induced activation of PPAR{gamma} and effects of PPAR{gamma} antagonists. A, ligand-dependent activation of PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4 in HT-29 cells. Cells were transfected with PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4, treated with 1, 5, or 10 µmol/L of the PPAR{gamma} agonists, and luciferase activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Results of all transactivation studies in this figure are presented as means ± SE for at least three separate determinations for each treatment group, and significant (P < 0.05) induction compared with solvent (DMSO) control is indicated by an asterisk. B, ligand-dependent activation of PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4 in HCT-15 cells. This experiment was carried out as described in A. Inhibition of transactivation in HT-29 (C) and HCT-15 (D) cells by GW9662. Cells were transfected with PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4, treated with 10 µmol/L rosiglitazone or PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs alone or in combination with 5 or 10 µmol/L GW9662, and luciferase activities were determined as described in A. Significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of induced transactivation by GW9662 is indicated (**). E, inhibition of HCT-15 cell growth by DIM-C-pPhC6H5: effects of GW9662. The effects of DIM-C-pPhC6H5 alone and in combination with GW9662 on proliferation of HCT-15 cells were determined as described in the Materials and Methods and outlined in the caption for Fig. 1Citation . Significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of cell proliferation (*) and antagonism of this response by GW9662 (**) are indicated.

 
A previous article (11) showed that 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 (PGJ2) but not TZDs induced transactivation in a mammalian two-hybrid assay in COS-1 cells transfected with VP-PPAR{gamma} and GAL4-coactivator chimeras (coactivators = SRC-1, SRC-2, SRC-3, and DRIP205/TBP/TRAP220). Therefore, we investigated ligand-dependent interactions of VP-PPAR{gamma} with chimeric GAL4-coactivator in colon cancer cells transfected with the pGAL4-luc reporter gene construct (Fig. 4)Citation . PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs and rosiglitazone induced transactivation in HT-29 cells transfected with VP-PPAR{gamma} and GAL4-PGC-1, and minimal interactions were observed using chimeric proteins containing SRC-1, SRC-2, SRC-3, DRIP205, or CARM-1. DIM-C-pPhCF3 also induced transactivation (< 2-fold) in cells transfected with GAL4-SRC-3, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 did not significantly induce activity in cells transfected with GAL4-PGC-1. PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs induced transactivation in HCT-15 cells transfected with GAL4-PGC-1 and with one exception (DIM-C-pPhtBu/GAL4-SRC2), minimal interactions with other coactivators were observed. In SW480 and RKO colon cancer cells, a variable pattern of PPAR{gamma}-coactivator interactions were observed and the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs but not rosiglitazone-induced interactions with PGC-1 (data not shown).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Ligand-induced PPAR{gamma}-coactivator interactions. HT-29 (A) and HCT-15 (B) were transfected with VP-PPAR{gamma}, coactivator-GAL4/pGAL4, treated with 10 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3 (1), DIM-C-pPhtBu (4), or DIM-C-pPhC6H5 (9), and luciferase activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as means ± SE for three replicate determinations for each treatment group, and significant (P < 0.05) induction is indicated by an asterisk.

 
Modulation of Cell Cycle Proteins, Differentiation Markers, and Apoptosis by PPAR{gamma} Agonists.
The effects of rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs on cyclin D1, p21, and p27 protein expression were investigated in HT-29 and HCT-15 after treatment with DMSO (control) and 5 or 7.5 µmol/L concentrations of these compounds for 24 hours. The results show that none of the treatments significantly affected levels of cyclin D1, p21, or p27 proteins (Fig. 5)Citation , and protein levels at other time points (6 and 12 hours) were also unchanged.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Modulation of cell cycle proteins. HT-29 (A) or HCT-15 (B) cells were treated with 5.0 or 7.5 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, or DIM-C-pPhC6H5 for 24 hours, and whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Cyclin D1, p21, and p27 protein levels were similar in all treatment groups in duplicate experiments after treatment for 24 or 12 hours (data not shown).

 
PPAR{gamma} agonists induce genes associated with differentiation in preadipocytes and cancer cell lines, and results in Fig. 6Citation show that keratin 18 is constitutively expressed in both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells. In the former cell line, 5 and 7.5 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 significantly induced keratin 18 protein, and a maximal 2-fold induction response was observed for 7.5 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhC6H5. Rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs also induced a 2.5 to 3-fold increase in keratin 18 protein in HCT-15 cells, showing that induction of this differentiation marker did not correlate with expression of wild-type or mutant PPAR{gamma}. A recent study showed that caveolins 1 and 2 were induced by TZDs in HT-29 cells (12) . Rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 also significantly induced caveolins 1 and 2 in this cell line, and protein levels were increased by 5 to 9-fold after treatment for 72 hours. Similar results were observed in HT-29 cells treated for only 48 hours with the PPAR{gamma} agonists (data not shown). In contrast, DIM-C-pPhCF3 and DIM-C-pPhC6H5, but not rosiglitazone, induced caveolins 1 and 2 in HCT-15 cells after treatment for 72 hours (Fig. 7, C and E)Citation and 48 hours (data not shown). Induction of caveolins 1 and 2 by DIM-C-pPhCF3 and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells was inhibited by cotreatment with the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW9662; similar inhibition was observed for rosiglitazone in HT-29 cells (Fig. 7, E and F)Citation . Because caveolin 1 exhibits tumor suppressor and growth inhibitory activities, the results suggest that induction of caveolins may be important for the antiproliferative effects of PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs and rosiglitazone in colon cancer cells (Fig. 1)Citation .



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Expression of keratin 18. HT-29 (A) and HCT-15 (B) cells were treated with 5.0 or 7.5 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, or DIM-C-pPhC6H5 for 3 days, and whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Keratin 18 levels in each treatment group were quantitated relative to an Sp1 protein loading control, and results are expressed as means ± SE for three replicate determinations for each treatment group. Significant (P < 0.05) induction is indicated by an asterisk.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Expression of caveolin 1 and caveolin 2. HT-29 (A) and HCT-15 (B) cells were treated with 5.0 or 7.5 µmol/L rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, or DIM-C-pPhC6H5 for 3 days, and whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Using a similar approach, caveolin 2 protein levels were determined in HT-29 (C) and HCT-15 (D) cells. Results are expressed as means ± SE for three replicate determinations (A and B) or averages of two determinations (C and D), and significant (P < 0.05) induction (*) (A and B) was determined as outlined in Fig. 6Citation . Inhibition of caveolin 1 induction in HT-29 (E) and HCT-15 (F) cells by GW9662. The experiment was carried out as described in A and B; however, cells were also treated with the PPAR{gamma} agonists (7.5 µmol/L) in combination with GW9662. Comparable results were observed in duplicate experiments.

 
PPAR{gamma} agonists also induce apoptosis in some cancer cell lines (13, 14, 15) , and therefore, this response was also investigated in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells. PPAR{gamma}-active compounds (10 µmol/L) did not induce poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage (a marker of apoptosis) or alter levels of bax or bcl-2 protein expression in HCT-15 or HT-29 cells (Fig. 8)Citation . In contrast, the proteasome inhibitor MG132 induced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage in both cell lines but did not affect levels of bcl-2 or bax proteins. Thus, differences in the observed antiproliferative activities of rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma} C-substituted DIMs in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells (Fig. 1)Citation was not due to apoptosis or modulation of cell cycle proteins but correlated with their cell context-dependent differential induction of caveolins 1 and 2 but not keratin 18.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. Effects of PPAR{gamma} agonists on apoptosis. HCT-15 (A) or HT-29 (B) cells were treated with DMSO, 10 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhCF3 (1), DIM-C-pPhtBu (4), DIM-C-pPhC6H5 (9), or rosiglitazone for 72 hours or 10 µmol/L MG132 for 20 hours, and whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis for PARP112/85, bcl-2, bax, or a nonspecific (NS) (loading control) protein. Similar results were observed in duplicate analyses.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PPAR{gamma} is overexpressed in multiple tumor types (5) and studies in several laboratories have demonstrated that PGJ2 and TZDs inhibit growth of human cancer cell lines in vitro and also in xenograft models in vivo (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . Two reports (17 , 18) showed that treatment of Min mice, which express a mutated inactive form of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor gene, with troglitazone or BRL-49653 induced colon polyp formation. These results contrast with xenograft studies where PPAR{gamma} agonists inhibit colon tumor growth (16) . Moreover, a recent study reported that 100 or 200 ppm pioglitazone and bezafibrate in the diet of Apc-deficient mice reduced intestinal polyps and hyperlipidemia (19) . Another study used PPAR{gamma}+/–/Min mice and their crosses to show that inhibition of colon carcinogenesis in these mice by PPAR{gamma} agonists is Apc dependent (20) .

Recent studies in this laboratory showed the C-substituted DIMs inhibited growth and G0-G1->S progression of MCF-7 breast cancer cells and activated PPAR{gamma}-dependent transactivation (7) . The growth inhibitory properties of rosiglitazone and three PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs (DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5) were also determined in HT-29, HCT-15, SW480, and RKO colon cancer cell lines. At concentrations of 10 µmol/L, rosiglitazone significantly inhibited growth of HT-29 cells (IC50 > 10 µmol/L) but not the other cell lines, whereas the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs inhibited growth of all four colon cancer cell lines with IC50 values between 1 and 10 µmol/L. The growth inhibitory effects of DIM-C-pPhC6H5 were inhibited by GW9662 in HCT-15 cells (Fig. 3E)Citation . A recent study showed that troglitazone inhibited growth and induced differentiation genes in HCT-15 cells (21) . However, these responses were observed using 50 µmol/L troglitazone, suggesting that activation of some mutant (K422Q) PPAR{gamma}-dependent responses in HCT-15 cells may be observed with higher concentrations of TZDs.

Rosiglitazone and the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIM activated PPAR{gamma}-GAL4/pGAL4 in all four cell lines (Fig. 3)Citation with variable potencies, and transactivation was inhibited after cotreatment with the PPAR{gamma} antagonist GW9662. The pattern of coactivator-PPAR{gamma} interactions in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells paralleled, in part, their responsiveness to the growth inhibitory effects of rosiglitazone and the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs (Fig. 4)Citation . Both structural classes of PPAR{gamma} agonists induced interactions between VP-PPAR{gamma} and GAL4-PGC-1 in HT-29 cells, whereas only the C-substituted DIMs induced the same interaction in HCT-15 cells (Fig. 4)Citation . In contrast, the pattern of coactivator-PPAR{gamma} interactions in SW480 and RKO cells was more complex, and minimal induction was observed for rosiglitazone in both cell lines (data not shown). The differences in rosiglitazone-induced transactivation in the mammalian two-hybrid assay in HT-29 and HCT-15 were observed using VP-PPAR{gamma} (wild-type) in both cell lines. This suggests that differences in PGC-1-PPAR{gamma} interactions in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells are not attributable to expression of the PPAR{gamma} mutant (K422Q) in the latter cell line but related to differential expression in the two cell lines of other nuclear cofactors required for this response. Although PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs preferentially induce PPAR{gamma}-PGC-1 interactions in HT-28 and HCT-15 cells, this was not uniformly observed for all ligands in these cells (Fig. 4)Citation , SW480 or RKO cells (data not shown). For example, DIM-C-pPhC6H5 inhibits HT-29 and HCT-15 cell growth (Fig. 1)Citation , induces caveolins 1/2 (Fig. 7)Citation , and both responses are inhibited by the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW9662 (Figs. 3ECitation , 7ECitation , and 7FCitation ). In contrast, 10 µmol/L DIM-C-pPhC6H5 does not induce transactivation in the mammalian two-hybrid assay in HT-29 cells using GAL4-PGC-1 and VP-PPAR{gamma} (Fig. 4)Citation . Current studies are investigating expression of PGC-1 and other coactivators and their role in PPAR{gamma}-dependent transactivation and growth inhibition in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells.

We further investigated the role of wild-type versus mutant (K422Q) PPAR{gamma} expression in mediating ligand-dependent responses in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells by examining their effects on proteins critical for cell cycle progression and differentiation. In HT-29 cells, treatment with rosiglitazone or PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs inhibited G0-G1->S-phase progression (Fig. 2A)Citation . These effects were not observed in HCT-15 cells (Fig. 2B)Citation and may be due to the high percentage of cells in G0-G1 with or without treatment (>74%). Despite differences in fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, neither rosiglitazone or the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs significantly changed levels of the cell cycle regulatory proteins p27, p21, or cyclin D1 in HT-29 or HCT-15 cells (Fig. 5)Citation . Moreover, we did not observe PPAR{gamma} agonist-dependent induction of apoptosis in either cell line (e.g., Fig. 8Citation ), suggesting that the antiproliferative effects (Fig. 1)Citation are not dependent on modulation of cell cycle proteins or induction of apoptosis in HT-29 or HCT-15 cells.

PPAR{gamma} agonists also induce genes/proteins associated with differentiation in colon cancer cells (8 , 12 , 19 , 22 , 23) . For example, troglitazone induced villin and intestinal alkaline phosphatase mRNA levels in several colon cancer cell lines (23) , and TZDs and PGJ2 induced caveolin 1 and caveolin 2 protein expression in HT-29 cells (12) . Keratin 18 and 20 proteins and CEACAM6 mRNA levels were minimally expressed in HCT-15 cells but were not affected by treatment with rosiglitazone; however, after transfection of HCT-15 cells with wild-type PPAR{gamma}, rosiglitazone induced these responses (8) . A direct comparison of PPAR{gamma} agonist-induced expression of differentiation markers in HCT-15 versus HT-29 cells has not been reported previously. The results in Fig. 6Citation show that rosiglitazone, DIM-C-pPhCF3, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 significantly induced keratin 18 in both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, indicating that keratin 18 protein induction was independent of PPAR{gamma} agonist structure and expression of wild-type or mutant (K422Q) PPAR{gamma}. In contrast, induction of caveolin 1 and caveolin 2 in HT-29 and HCT-15 was dependent on both ligand structure and cell context (Fig. 7)Citation . Rosiglitazone induced caveolins 1 and 2 in HT-29 but not in HCT-15 cells, whereas PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs induced caveolins 1 and 2 in both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, and these responses were inhibited after cotreatment with GW9662. This pattern of induced caveolin expression parallels the growth inhibitory effects of rosiglitazone and PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs in HT-29 and HCT-15 cells (Fig. 1)Citation , suggesting that induced caveolin 1 and caveolin 2 expression may contribute to growth inhibition of colon cancer cells. This observation is consistent with a study by Bender et al. (24) , showing that overexpression of caveolin 1 in HT-29 or DLD (HCT-15) cells significantly decreased their tumorigenicity in athymic nude mouse xenograft models.

In summary, this study demonstrates the PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs induce PPAR{gamma}-dependent transactivation in colon cancer cells expressing wild-type (HT-29) or mutant (K422Q) (HCT-15) PPAR{gamma}. Moreover, these compounds also inhibit growth of HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, whereas equivalent concentrations of rosiglitazone are active only in the former cell line. The enhanced growth inhibitory activity of PPAR{gamma}-active C-substituted DIMs versus rosiglitazone in HCT-15 cells correlated with the induction of caveolins 1 and 2 by the former compounds and not by rosiglitazone (Fig. 7)Citation . Current studies are focused on the mechanisms of the growth inhibitory effects of this new class of PPAR{gamma} agonists in other colon cancer cell lines and the role of caveolins and other genes/proteins in mediating PPAR{gamma}-dependent antitumorigenic activities.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: NIH Grant ES09106 and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Stephen Safe, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, 4466 TAMU, Veterinary Research Building 409, College Station, TX 77843-4466. Phone: (979) 845-5988; Fax: (979) 862-4929; E-mail: ssafe{at}cvm.tamu.edu

Received 2/ 5/04. Revised 6/ 1/04. Accepted 6/ 4/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. PPARgamma: a nuclear regulator of metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth. J Biol Chem, 276: 37731-4, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  2. Willson RM, Lambert MH, Kliewer SA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} and metabolic disease. Annu Rev Biochem, 70: 341-67, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lee CH, Olson P, Evans RM. Minireview: lipid metabolism, metabolic diseases, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Endocrinology, 144: 2201-7, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Murphy GJ, Holder JC. PPAR-gamma agonists: therapeutic role in diabetes, inflammation and cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 21: 469-74, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ikezoe T, Miller CW, Kawano S, et al Mutational analysis of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} gene in human malignancies. Cancer Res, 61: 5307-10, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sarraf P, Mueller E, Smith WM, et al Loss-of-function mutations in PPAR gamma associated with human colon cancer. Mol Cell, 3: 799-804, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Qin C, Morrow D, Stewart J, et al A new class of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists that inhibit growth of breast cancer cells: 1,1-bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes. Mol Cancer Ther, 3: 247-59, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gupta RA, Sarraf P, Mueller E, et al Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}-mediated differentiation: a mutation in colon cancer cells reveals divergent and cell type-specific mechanisms. J Biol Chem, 278: 22669-77, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Qin C, Burghardt R, Smith R, et al Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists induce proteasome-dependent degradation of cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor {alpha} in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res, 63: 958-64, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Brockman JA, Gupta RA, DuBois RN. Activation of PPARgamma leads to inhibition of anchorage independent growth of human colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology, 115: 1049-55, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kodera Y, Takeyama K, Murayama A, et al Ligand type-specific interactions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} with transcriptional coactivators. J Biol Chem, 275: 33201-4, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Burgermeister E, Tencer L, Liscovitch M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} up-regulates caveolin-1 and caveolin-2 expression in human carcinoma cells. Oncogene, 22: 3888-900, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Chang TH, Szabo E. Induction of differentiation and apoptosis by ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res, 60: 1129-38, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Elstner E, Muller C, Koshizuka K, et al Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95: 8806-11, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Takahashi N, Okumura T, Motomura W, et al Activation of PPARgamma inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells. FEBS Lett, 455: 135-9, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sarraf P, Mueller E, Jones D, et al Differentiation and reversal of malignant changes in colon cancer through PPARgamma. Nat Med, 4: 1046-52, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Lefebvre A, Chen I, Desreumaux P, et al Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} promotes the development of colon tumors in C57BL/6J-APCMin/+ mice. Nat Med, 4: 1053-7, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Saez E, Tontonoz P, Nelson MC, et al Activators of the nuclear receptor PPARgamma enhance colon polyp formation. Nat Med, 4: 1058-61, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Niho N, Takahashi M, Kitamura T, et al Concomitant suppression of hyperlipidemia and intestinal polyp formation in Apc-deficient mice by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands. Cancer Res, 63: 6090-5, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Girnun GD, Smith WM, Drori S, et al APC-dependent suppression of colon carcinogenesis by PPARgamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99: 13771-6, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kato M, Kusumi T, Tsuchida S, et al Induction of differentiation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} expression in colon cancer cell lines by troglitazone. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 130: 73-9, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Gupta RA, Brockman JA, Sarraf P, Willson TM, DuBois RN. Target genes of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in colorectal cancer cells. J Biol Chem, 276: 29681-7, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kitamura S, Miyazaki Y, Shinomura Y, et al Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} induces growth arrest and differentiation markers of human colon cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Res, 90: 75-80, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Bender FC, Reymond MA, Bron C, Quest AF. Caveolin-1 levels are down-regulated in human colon tumors, and ectopic expression of caveolin-1 in colon carcinoma cell lines reduces cell tumorigenicity. Cancer Res, 60: 5870-8, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Ichite, M. B. Chougule, T. Jackson, S. V. Fulzele, S. Safe, and M. Singh
Enhancement of Docetaxel Anticancer Activity by a Novel Diindolylmethane Compound in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 15(2): 543 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
David. L. Carbone, K. A. Popichak, J. A. Moreno, S. Safe, and R. B. Tjalkens
Suppression of 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-Induced Nitric-Oxide Synthase 2 Expression in Astrocytes by a Novel Diindolylmethane Analog Protects Striatal Neurons against Apoptosis
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2009; 75(1): 35 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. D. Cho, S. Chintharlapalli, M. Abdelrahim, S. Papineni, S. Liu, J. Guo, P. Lei, A. Abudayyeh, and S. Safe
5,5'-Dibromo-bis(3'-indolyl)methane induces Kruppel-like factor 4 and p21 in colon cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2008; 7(7): 2109 - 2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Lei, M. Abdelrahim, S. D. Cho, S. Liu, S. Chintharlapalli, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes inhibit colon cancer cell and tumor growth through activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1139 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Papineni, S. Chintharlapalli, and S. Safe
Methyl 2-Cyano-3,11-dioxo-18{beta}-olean-1,12-dien-30-oate Is a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist That Induces Receptor-Independent Apoptosis in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2008; 73(2): 553 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. York, M. Abdelrahim, S. Chintharlapalli, S. D. Lucero, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-Indolyl)-1-(p-Substitutedphenyl)methanes Induce Apoptosis and Inhibit Renal Cell Carcinoma Growth
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6743 - 6752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, S. Liu, I. Jutooru, G. Chadalapaka, S.-d. Cho, R. S. Murthy, Y. You, and S. Safe
2-Cyano-lup-1-en-3-oxo-20-oic acid, a cyano derivative of betulinic acid, activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in colon and pancreatic cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 2337 - 2346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J.-R. Weng, C.-H. Tsai, S. K. Kulp, D. Wang, C.-H. Lin, H.-C. Yang, Y. Ma, A. Sargeant, C.-F. Chiu, M.-H. Tsai, et al.
A Potent Indole-3-Carbinol Derived Antitumor Agent with Pleiotropic Effects on Multiple Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7815 - 7824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, I. Jutooru, A. McAlees, and S. Safe
Structure-dependent activity of glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} agonists in colon cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2007; 6(5): 1588 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-Indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes Inhibit Growth, Induce Apoptosis, and Decrease the Androgen Receptor in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells through Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Independent Pathways
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2007; 71(2): 558 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. D. Cho, K. Yoon, S. Chintharlapalli, M. Abdelrahim, P. Lei, S. Hamilton, S. Khan, S. K. Ramaiah, and S. Safe
Nur77 Agonists Induce Proapoptotic Genes and Responses in Colon Cancer Cells through Nuclear Receptor-Dependent and Nuclear Receptor-Independent Pathways
Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 674 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. Lei, M. Abdelrahim, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes inhibit ovarian cancer cell growth through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-dependent and independent pathways.
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2006; 5(9): 2324 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes inhibit colon cancer cell and tumor growth through PPAR{gamma}-dependent and PPAR{gamma}-independent pathways
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1362 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Abdelrahim, K. Newman, K. Vanderlaag, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
3,3'-Diindolylmethane (DIM) and its derivatives induce apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent upregulation of DR5
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 717 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. A. Savino III, J. F. Evans, D. Rabinowitz, K. J. Auborn, and T. H. Carter
Multiple, disparate roles for calcium signaling in apoptosis of human prostate and cervical cancer cells exposed to diindolylmethane.
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 556 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Konopleva, W. Zhang, Y.-X. Shi, T. McQueen, T. Tsao, M. Abdelrahim, M. F. Munsell, M. Johansen, D. Yu, T. Madden, et al.
Synthetic triterpenoid 2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oic acid induces growth arrest in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells.
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 317 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Kassouf, S. Chintharlapalli, M. Abdelrahim, G. Nelkin, S. Safe, and A. M. Kamat
Inhibition of Bladder Tumor Growth by 1,1-Bis(3'-Indolyl)-1-(p-Substitutedphenyl)Methanes: A New Class of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonists
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 412 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, S. J. Baek, S. Liu, and S. Safe
1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes Are Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonists but Decrease HCT-116 Colon Cancer Cell Survival through Receptor-Independent Activation of Early Growth Response-1 and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Activated Gene-1
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1782 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Chintharlapalli, R. Burghardt, S. Papineni, S. Ramaiah, K. Yoon, and S. Safe
Activation of Nur77 by Selected 1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes Induces Apoptosis through Nuclear Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24903 - 24914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Chintharlapalli, S. Papineni, M. Konopleva, M. Andreef, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
2-Cyano-3,12-dioxoolean-1,9-dien-28-oic Acid and Related Compounds Inhibit Growth of Colon Cancer Cells through Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Dependent and -Independent Pathways
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Contractor, I. J. Samudio, Z. Estrov, D. Harris, J. A. McCubrey, S. H. Safe, M. Andreeff, and M. Konopleva
A Novel Ring-Substituted Diindolylmethane,1,1-Bis[3'-(5-Methoxyindolyl)]-1-(p-t-Butylphenyl) Methane, Inhibits Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation and Induces Apoptosis in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 65(7): 2890 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chintharlapalli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chintharlapalli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online