| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and 2 Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, and 3 Lung Cancer Research Program at Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and 4 Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, California
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis is a signal transduction system composed of IGFs, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), their receptors, and proteases that modulate the activity of IGFBPs. IGF-I and IGF-II activate the IGF axis via type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-IR), whereas the IGFBPs inhibit the IGF axis by a variety of IGF-dependent and -independent mechanisms (16, 17, 18) . In brief, shifting the balance along the IGF axis affects proliferation, survival, and differentiation of normal and tumor cells. Epidemiologic studies indicate that events resulting in greater activation potential for the IGF axis, such as increased serum IGF-I and decreased IGFBP-3 levels, are risk factors for various malignancies, including lung (19) , prostate (20) , breast (21) , and colon cancer (22) . In support of increased systemic IGF-I as a risk factor, studies show that systemically administered recombinant IGF-I enhances tumor growth in athymic mice (23) , whereas the reduced systemic IGF-I levels delayed the onset of chemically and genetically induced mouse mammary tumors (24) . Like COX-2, IGF-IR also is associated with in vitro and in vivo malignant transformation (25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30) . Studies show that IGF-IR significantly enhances apoptosis resistance (28) , proliferation (29) , and metastasis (30) . Hence, we speculated that studying tumor phenotypes associated with COX-2 and various members of the IGF axis would help delineate how tumor COX-2 expression regulates the malignant phenotype in NSCLC.
IGF-IR is a protein tyrosine-kinase cell surface receptor composed of an extracellular ligand binding 
-subunit and an intracellular ß-subunit (31)
. In normal conditions, the access of IGF-I and IGF-II to IGF-IR, as well as the activity of IGF-IR, are tightly controlled by a number of factors, including IGFBPs (16
, 17)
. Activation of IGF-IR up-regulates phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/AKT-kinase (PI3k/AKT) signaling and increases proliferation and survival (32, 33, 34)
. As previous studies show, (1)
NSCLC cells frequently harbor high levels of COX-2 (10
, 11)
and PI3k/AKT (35)
; (2)
up-regulation of COX-2 in tumor cells partially depends on PI3k/AKT (36)
; and (3)
a COX-2 inhibitor drug, celecoxib, down-regulates AKT activity (37)
. Thus, a functional link between COX-2, IGF-IR, and PI3k/AKT signaling is suggested by these studies.
To determine the effect of COX-2 on IGF signaling in NSCLC cells, we used an experimental strategy previously used by Tsujii and DuBois (3) . Namely, we expressed COX-2 in sense and antisense orientations in an NSCLC cell line, A549. Our study shows that COX-2 strengthens the IGF-I– and IGF-II–related survival and proliferation of A549 cells by modulating the autophosphorylation of IGF-IR, the class IA PI3k activity, and expression of IGFBP-3. Overexpression of COX-2 also enhanced the sensitivity of A549 cells to the antiproliferative effect of PI3k inhibitors. We also found that celecoxib down-regulated the class IA PI3k activity in a number of COX-2–expressing NSCLC cell lines, thus, supporting the role of COX-2 as a modulator of the IGF axis. This is the first report linking NSCLC COX-2 expression with the events that augment the stimulatory arm of the IGF axis.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Drugs.
SC58236 (provided by Searle/Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ) was dissolved in EtOH at 100 mg/mL. Celecoxib (Pfizer, New York, NY) was dissolved in DMSO at 25 mmol/L. NS398 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in EtOH at 10 mmol/L. IGF-I and IGF-II (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) and Long R3IGF-I (Cell Sciences, Canton, MA) were dissolved at 100 µg/mL in water, 10 mmol/L acetic, and 10 mmol/L hydrochloric acid, respectively. LY294,002 (Alexis Pharmaceutical, San Diego, CA) was dissolved at 20 mmol/L in EtOH. Wortmannin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was dissolved at 2 mmol/L in DMSO. 16,16-Dimethyl-prostaglandin E2 (dm-PGE2; Sigma) was dissolved at 10 mg/mL in EtOH.
Flow Cytometry.
Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide double-staining (API) of A549 cells was measured using FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) at the UCLA Flow Cytometry Lab. From each sample, 
10,000 cells were analyzed for API, and results presented as dot plots where the FL1 and FL2 values indicated the intensity of annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide staining, respectively (Fig. 1)
. The viable portion of cells was determined as a population of cells with low annexin V-FITC and low propidium iodide staining (Fig. 1A and D)
. The WinMDI 2.8 (http://facs.scripps.edu/software.html) and CellQuest (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) software were used to analyze results. Cells were stained with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide using ApoTarget kit (BioSource International Inc., Camarillo, CA). Cells were plated in six-well plates. For API, supernatants were collected in 5-mL polystyrene tubes (Fisher, Hampton, NH), and cells were trypsinized for 4 to 5 minutes in 0.2 mL of trypsin/EDTA. Trypsin was neutralized by and cells were resuspended in 2.0 mL of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)-RPMI 1640. The resuspended cells were collected in the same tube as their respective supernatants and pelleted at 2400 rpm (1500 x g) for 5 minutes in Clay Adams Sero-Fuge 2002 (Becton Dickinson). The cells then were washed once with 2.0 mL of PBS, collected by centrifugation as described previously, and resuspended gently in 0.1 mL of annexin binding buffer containing annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide as specified by the manufacturer and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. At the end of this 15-minute incubation, the volume of cell suspensions was increased to 0.5 mL by annexin binding buffer, and cells were analyzed for API within 15 to 30 minutes.
|
and 2
). As determined by trypan blue, this control group was always 95% percent viable. In fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, these control cells produced an API signal that formed a single major elliptically shaped dot plot, which we used to define the upper limits of low annexin V-FITC and low propidium iodide staining (Fig. 1A)
. Three independent experiments revealed that the mean viability (V) of the control A549-S and A549-AS was 94.8 ± 0.53% and 96.5 ± 0.87%, respectively (no statistical difference, P = 0.16 in t test; Fig. 1A and D
).
|
D = VFBS – VSFM, where
VFBS = viability of control cells grown in 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 (Fig. 1A and D)
; and
VSFM = viability of untreated control cells in SFM (Fig. 1B and E)
.
The IGF-mediated protection (I) against SFM-induced cell death was calculated as follows:
I = VIGF – VSFM, where
VIGF = viability of IGF-treated cells in SFM (Fig. 1C and F)
; and
VSFM = see above.
Invariably, VIGF was greater than VSFM.
Proliferation of A549 Cells.
The proliferation (P) of A549-S and A549-AS in response to IGF-I, IGF-II, SC58236, celecoxib, LY294,002, Wortmannin, and various combinations of IGFs with COX-2 and PI3k inhibitors was determined as follows:
P = (T – B)/(C – B), where
T = average final cell count or A490 of treated group;
C = average final cell count or A490 of untreated control group; and
B = average baseline cell count or A490 at the start of treatment.
The COX-2-enhanced mitogenicity of IGFs was calculated as follows:
E = PS – PA, where
PS = proliferation of A549-S in response to IGFs; and
PA = proliferation of A549-AS in response to IGFs.
In the IGF proliferation assays (see below), the cell counts as determined by hemacytometer were used to calculate the aforementioned values. In the MTS assay (see below), the absorption values at 490 nm (A490) were used to determine proliferation of A549-S and A549-AS.
IGF Proliferation Assay.
Confluent A549-S and A549-AS were harvested, counted by hemacytometer, plated in six-well plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) at 50,000 cells per well in 10% FBS-RPMI 1640, and grown for 48 hours. At this 48-hour time point, cells were washed twice with PBS and then supplemented with serum-free RPMI 1640 containing either IGF-I or IGF-II at various concentrations. Control cells were supplemented with SFM alone. At this time point, the baseline (B) values for A549-S and A549-AS were determined as an average of cell counts in six wells. All of the groups were grown in triplicate for an additional 72 hours, and the cells were counted by hemacytometer at the end of experiment.
MTS Assay.
The MTS assay was carried out using CellTiter AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The formazan formation in MTS assay is nearly proportional to the cell number and thus can be used to determine proliferation and cytotoxicity (18)
. Cells were plated at 2500 to 3000 cells in 0.1 mL of 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 per well in 96-well plates, grown for 36 to 48 hours, washed twice with PBS, and supplemented with SFM containing IGF-I, IGF-II, or combination of one of the IGFs with a COX-2 inhibitor drug, SC58236. The cells then were grown for an additional 48 hours, and the MTS assay was carried out using the manufacturer’s specifications. The A490 values were determined using Benchmark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). All of the groups were tested in sets of six wells. Individual baseline (B) values for plates at the beginning of IGF/drug treatments were determined as an average A490 of 12 wells. In experiments in which the growth inhibitory effect of LY294,002 and Wortmannin in 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 was determined, the cells were plated as described previously and grown for 48 hours, at which time point they were washed once with PBS and then supplemented with fresh 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 containing PI3k inhibitor drugs at various concentrations (Fig. 5A)
. In experiments with combined use of the PI3k inhibitor drug LY294,002 and IGFs, cells were plated at 6000 cells per well in 0.1 mL of 10% FBS-RPMI 1640, grown overnight, washed once with PBS, provided with IGFs and LY294,002, and assayed 48 hours after the introduction of drugs.
|
and 4C
).
|
|
PI3k Class IA Activity by ELISA.
PI3k activity was determined using PI3k ELISA (Echelon Biosciences Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). This kit measures PI3k activity as a conversion of PI(4,5)P2 into PI(3,4,5)P3. We used this kit in conjunction with anti-p85 PI3k antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). Thus, we specifically determined the class IA activity of PI3k. Briefly, cells were washed three times with ice-cold buffer A (see the manufacturer’s specifications) and then lysed in buffer A containing 1% NP40 and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Lysates were incubated on ice for 20 to 30 minutes and then cleared at 16,000 x g for 20 minutes. PI3k was immunoprecipitated by polyclonal anti-p85 PI3k antibody at 4°C for 1 hour. Binding of the coimmunoprecipitated p85/p110 PI3k complexes to protein A-agarose beads was carried out at 4°C for 1 hour, and the beads then were washed three times with buffer A containing 1% NP40, three times with buffer B, and twice with buffer C as specified by the manufacturer. The kinase reaction was carried out for 1 hour at room temperature in 4 mmol/L MgCl2, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 20 mmol/L NaCl supplemented with ATP at 25 µmol/L.
IGFBP-3 ELISA.
IGFBP-3 in the supernatants and cell lysates of A549-S and A549-AS was determined by Active ELISA kit for IGFBP-3 (Diagnostic System Laboratories, Webster, TX). Twenty-five microliters of a supernatant or cell lysate of A549-S and A549-AS diluted in 50 µL of assay buffer were used to quantify IGFBP-3 as specified by the manufacturer.
Statistics.
P values were calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test assuming equal variance and paired t test.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
and 2A
, black bars) and A549-AS (Figs. 1
and 2A
, white bars) against SFM-induced cell death. Similar data were obtained with IGF-I (data not shown). Importantly, COX-2 overexpression enhanced IGF-mediated protection against SFM-induced cell death by 27% (Fig. 2A
, red connectors). As depicted in Figs. 1
and 2C–F
, the prevailing type of cell death in our experimental model was apoptosis. Consistent with these findings, a COX-2 inhibitor drug, SC58236, also reduced the antiapoptotic effect of IGF-II (Fig. 2B
, red connectors) and IGF-I (data not shown) in A549-S.
Inhibition of Tumor Cell COX-2 Increases Susceptibility to Apoptosis.
As evident in Fig. 2C and D
, the COX-2 inhibitor drug SC52368 did not alter the viability of A549-S cells in serum-containing medium (red numerals). In contrast, as depicted in Fig. 2E and F
, the viability of SC58236-treated A549-S was significantly decreased in SFM compared with the untreated control A549-S (64.3 ± 3.2% versus 78.7 ± 3.4% as measured in quadruplicate; P = 0.0003). Consistent with the data in COX-2 gene-modified cells (Fig. 2A
, dashed connectors), the SFM-induced cell death was significantly greater in the SC58236-treated A549-S compared with the untreated control A549-S cells (Fig. 2B
, dashed connectors).
Overexpression of Tumor Cell COX-2 Enhances Mitogenicity of IGFs on A549 Cells.
Compared with A549-AS, the IGF-mediated proliferation of A549-S was significantly increased (Figs. 3A and B
and 4C
). Consistent with these findings, SC58236 significantly decreased the proliferation of A549-S in response to both IGFs (Fig. 3B)
. Similar results also were obtained with another COX-2 inhibitor drug, celecoxib (data not shown). Thus, COX-2 enhances the proliferation of A549 cells in response to IGFs. In summary, our viability and proliferation data indicate that high-level COX-2 expression in A549 cells increases IGF-dependent and -independent survival.
Overexpression of Tumor Cell COX-2 Expression Facilitates the Autophosphorylation of IGF-IR.
On the basis of our findings indicating a COX-2–dependent sensitivity to IGFs, we speculated that tumor cell COX-2 expression could modulate the phosphorylation of IGF-IR. We studied the phosphorylation of Tyr1131 of IGF-IR in A549-S and A549-AS cells. Phosphorylation of the triple tyrosine cluster Tyr1131/1135/1136 in the intracellular kinase domain of IGF-IR is caused by autophosphorylation and required for activation of the intracellular kinase domain of IGF-IR (39)
. As determined by immunoprecipitation of the ß-subunit of IGF-IR, the pIGF-IR-Tyr1131 level in A549-S, but not in A549-AS, was distinctly elevated following 24 hours of IGF-II treatment (Fig. 3C and D)
. Consistent with these data, SC58236 decreased the IGF-II–stimulated levels of pIGF-IR-Tyr1131 in A549-S (Fig. 3C)
, whereas the pIGF-IR-Tyr1131 levels of A549-AS did not respond to the SC58236 treatment (Fig. 3D)
.
As shown in Fig. 3D and E
, PGE2 appears to mediate the COX-2-dependent effects on IGF-IR. Namely, a chemically stable analog of PGE2, dm-PGE2, reproduced the effect of elevated COX-2 expression on IGF-IR autophosphorylation in A549-AS (Fig. 3D)
. In addition, the pIGF-IR-Tyr1131 levels of A549-S, but not A549-AS, were responsive to SC58236 in 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 (Fig. 3E)
, suggesting an important role for tumor cell COX-2 expression in the regulation of autophosphorylation of IGF-IR. In conclusion, our results indicate that COX-2 facilitates the autophosphorylation of IGF-IR.
Overexpression of Tumor Cell COX-2 Increases Class IA PI3k Activity.
PI3k signaling has been implicated in regulation of proliferation and apoptosis signaling downstream of IGF-IR (32, 33, 34)
. Using a polyclonal anti-PI3Kp85 antibody to immunoprecipitate the PI3kp85/p110 complex, we measured the class IA PI3k catalyzed conversion of PI(4,5)P2 into PI(3,4,5)P3. Two independent measurements revealed that the class IA PI3k activity in A549-S was 24 ± 9% higher than in A549-AS. Consistent with genetic inhibition of COX-2, pharmacologic inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib decreased the class IA PI3k activity in A549-S (Fig. 5A)
. Similar effects were observed in four additional COX-2–expressing NSCLC cell lines (Fig. 5B)
. Importantly, the capacity of celecoxib to decrease PI3k activity in NSCLC cells was manifest at a concentration (5 µmol/L) that could be achieved in plasma of cancer patients treated with COX-2 inhibitors (40)
.
Overexpression of Tumor Cell COX-2 Enhances Sensitivity of A549 Cells to PI3k Inhibitors.
Although associated with increased viability (Figs. 1
and 2
), proliferation (Fig. 3)
, and PI3k activity (Fig. 5A)
, the elevated levels of COX-2 also increased the sensitivity of A549 cells to PI3k inhibitors. Specifically, the proliferation of A549-S was more efficiently inhibited by PI3k inhibitors compared with A549-AS in 10% FBS-RPMI 1640 (Fig. 4A)
and serum-free RPMI (Fig. 4A and B)
. In agreement with the results in the COX-2 gene–modified A549 cells (Fig. 4A)
, celecoxib (5 µmol/L) reduced the antiproliferative effect of LY294,002 (10 µmol/L) on A549-S by 15%. Importantly, the IGF-II–mediated growth of A549-S also was more sensitive than A549-AS to the antiproliferative effect of LY294,002 (Fig. 4C
, inset). Thus, our data suggest an important role for PI3k as a downstream mediator of the effects of COX-2 on IGF-II–mediated proliferation of A549 cells.
Overexpression of Tumor Cell COX-2 Down-Regulates IGFBP-3.
Compared with A549-AS, A549-S cells produced lower levels of IGFBP-3 (Fig. 6A and B)
. Likewise, as determined by Affymetrix GeneChip (Santa Clara, CA), the mRNA expression of IGFBP-3 was 10-fold lower in A549-S cells compared with A549-AS cells (data not shown). Consistent with these results, exposure of A549-S cells to COX-2 inhibitor drugs SC58236 and NS398 up-regulated the levels of IGFBP-3 in tumor cell culture supernatants (Fig. 6C)
. Thus, down-regulation of IGFBP-3 in the COX-2–overexpressing A549 cells is associated with enhanced viability and mitogenicity of IGFs.
|
), Long R3IGF-I (25 ng/mL) exceeded the mitogenic effect of IGF-I (25 ng/mL) by 20%. Thus, this result suggests that down-regulation of IGFBP-3 by the overexpression of tumor cell COX-2 serves to increase the mitogenic potential of IGFs. In summary, our current data suggest that COX-2 augments the stimulatory arm of the IGF axis in NSCLC (Fig. 6D)
. |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
As hypothesized, COX-2 enhanced the IGF-related viability and proliferation of NSCLC cells (Figs. 1
, 2
, and 3
). The COX-2–enhanced viability and mitogenicity of IGFs in A549 cells were accompanied by the following: (1) facilitated autophosphorylation of IGF-IR (Fig. 3B)
; (2) up-regulation of class IA PI3k signaling (Fig. 2)
; and (3) down-regulation of IGFBP-3 expression (Fig. 6)
. All of these activities can be interpreted as amplifying the mitogenic and prosurvival activities of IGF-I and IGF-II and thus are consistent with and serve to explain our initial findings (Figs. 1
, 2
, and 3
).
COX-2 (12)
and IGF-IR kinase inhibitors (26
, 27)
have produced significant antitumor effects in mouse models for human cancer. Therefore, our current data indicating that COX-2 facilitates the autophosphorylation of IGF-IR (Fig. 3C–E
), combined with the previous findings showing the antitumor effects of IGF-IR and COX-2 inhibitors, suggest that in future NSCLC-targeted therapies, COX-2 and IGF-IR kinase inhibitors could be combined. Simultaneous and alternate administration of COX-2 and IGF-IR kinase could produce benefits. Although the former can potentially maximize the suppression of IGF-IR–mediated NSCLC tumor growth, the latter can alleviate the toxicity of these drugs while also preventing a substantial refacilitation of the IGF-IR kinase activity (Fig. 3C–E)
. The rationale for the use of combination of COX-2 and IGF-IR inhibitors is further supported by our current and previous (2)
findings indicating that, rather than inducing cell death in serum-containing medium, inhibition of COX-2 increases the susceptibility of NSCLC cells to apoptosis (Figs. 1
and 2C–F
).
Autophosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases including IGF-IR is required for the class IA PI3k activity. An autophosphorylated IGF-IR facilitates translocation of PI3k to the cytoplasmic membrane where the lipid substrates of PI3k reside. Specifically, an autophosphorylated ß-subunit of IGF-IR binds the class IA PI3k, a complex of p85 adaptor/p110 catalytic subunits, whereby it translocates this p85/p110 complex to the cytoplasmic membrane, and subsequently activates the conversion of PI(4,5)P2 into PI(3,4,5)P3. The accumulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 then activates the PI3k downstream kinases, such as PDK1 and AKTK (31)
. Thus, the inability of IGF-IR to maintain autophosphorylation, as we found to have occurred in response to COX-2 inhibition (Fig. 3)
, leads to a reduced ability of IGF-IR to control the activity of downstream kinases, including PI3k (Fig. 2)
. This limited upstream control over PI3k in turn results in strengthening of the inhibitory arm of the IGF axis and thus shifts the balance toward growth inhibition and cell death (Fig. 6D)
.
Our current data also show that PI3k is another potential target for the future NSCLC therapies. Most interestingly, the genetic overexpression of COX-2 enhanced the sensitivity of A549 proliferation to PI3k inhibitors LY294,002 and Wortmannin (Fig. 2)
. On the basis of these data, we hypothesize that the high levels of COX-2 increase the dependency of proliferation of A549 cells on PI3k signaling (Fig. 3)
. In conclusion, an important course of COX-2–related events can be envisioned. Namely, as COX-2 increases the IGF-related survival and proliferation via up-regulation of PI3k signaling, it also increases the vulnerability of NSCLC tumor growth to the abrogation of this pathway.
Our current results also are compatible with earlier studies linking high levels of COX-2 to up-regulation of the stimulatory arm of the IGF axis. Similar to our current findings, these previous studies show COX-2 up-regulates the PI3k-AKT pathway (36 , 37) and down-regulates IGFBP-3 mRNA expression (47) . Celecoxib also has been shown to down-regulate the expression of IGF-IR and IGF-II–related tumor growth (48) . A link between the IGF axis and COX-2 also can be inferred from the previous publications showing that IGF-I increases COX-2 mRNA expression and PGE2 production (49) and that IGF-I amplifies the interleukin 1ß–induced PGE2 production (50) .
In summary, our current findings are of particular interest when viewed in the context of previous studies indicating that elevated levels of the systemic, liver-derived IGF-I and serum IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio might be risk factors for the malignancies (19, 20, 21, 22) that also frequently express high levels of COX-2 (10 , 11 , 42, 43, 44) . Namely, overexpression of COX-2 appears to improve the capacity of NSCLC cells to take advantage of liver-derived systemic, as well as tumor-produced, IGF-I and IGF-II. This is the first report to link tumor COX-2 expression with the antiapoptotic and mitogenic effects of IGFs. Our findings suggest that a combination of elevated serum IGFs and tumor COX-2 expression promotes NSCLC progression.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Steven M. Dubinett, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 37–131 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Phone: 310-794-6566; Fax: 310-267-2829; E-mail: sdubinett{at}mednet.ucla.edu
Received 4/ 7/04. Revised 6/ 2/04. Accepted 7/19/04.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Dubinett,, J. T. Mao, and S. Hazra Focusing Downstream in Lung Cancer Prevention: 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Cancer Prevention Research, September 1, 2008; 1(4): 223 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Hernandez, C. Grenade, E. R. Santos, C. Bonilla, C. Ahaghotu, and R. A. Kittles IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 gene variants influence on serum levels and prostate cancer risk in African-Americans Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2007; 28(10): 2154 - 2159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. F. McCarty and K. I. Block Preadministration of High-Dose Salicylates, Suppressors of NF-{kappa}B Activation, May Increase the Chemosensitivity of Many Cancers: An Example of Proapoptotic Signal Modulation Therapy. Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 252 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ding, J. Li, C. Xue, K. Wu, W. Ouyang, D. Zhang, Y. Yan, and C. Huang Cyclooxygenase-2 Induction by Arsenite Is through a Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cell-dependent Pathway and Plays an Antiapoptotic Role in Beas-2B Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24405 - 24413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Thomson, E. Buck, F. Petti, G. Griffin, E. Brown, N. Ramnarine, K. K. Iwata, N. Gibson, and J. D. Haley Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Is a Determinant of Sensitivity of Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Cell Lines and Xenografts to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9455 - 9462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Sharma, S.-C. Yang, L. Zhu, K. Reckamp, B. Gardner, F. Baratelli, M. Huang, R. K. Batra, and S. M. Dubinett Tumor Cyclooxygenase-2/Prostaglandin E2-Dependent Promotion of FOXP3 Expression and CD4+CD25+ T Regulatory Cell Activities in Lung Cancer Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5211 - 5220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. R. Hirsch and S. M. Lippman Advances in the Biology of Lung Cancer Chemoprevention J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3186 - 3197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
, A549-S; 
, A549-AS;
, A549-S + SC58236. *, P < .05.
