Cancer Research Donn Young  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sorscher, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sorscher, E. J.
[Cancer Research 64, 6610-6615, September 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Excellent In vivo Bystander Activity of Fludarabine Phosphate against Human Glioma Xenografts that Express the Escherichia coli Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase Gene

Jeong S. Hong1, William R. Waud6, Dana N. Levasseur3, Tim M. Townes3, Hui Wen2, Sylvia A. McPherson4, Bryan A. Moore5, Zsuzsa Bebok1, Paula W. Allan6, John A. Secrist, III6, William B. Parker6 and Eric J. Sorscher2

1 Departments of Cell Biology, 2 Medicine, 3 Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, and 4 Center for Aids Research Core, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; 5 Serologicals Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and 6 Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) expressed in tumors converts relatively nontoxic prodrugs into membrane-permeant cytotoxic compounds with high bystander activity. In the present study, we examined tumor regressions resulting from treatment with E. coli PNP and fludarabine phosphate (F-araAMP), a clinically approved compound used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We tested bystander killing with an adenoviral construct expressing E. coli PNP and then more formally examined thresholds for the bystander effect, using both MuLv and lentiviral vectoring. Because of the importance of understanding the mechanism of bystander action and the limits to this anticancer strategy, we also evaluated in vivo variables related to the expression of E. coli PNP (level of E. coli PNP activity in tumors, ectopic expression in liver, percentage of tumor cells transduced in situ, and accumulation of active metabolites in tumors). Our results indicate that F-araAMP confers excellent in vivo dose-dependent inhibition of bystander tumor cells, including strong responses in subcutaneous human glioma xenografts when 95 to 97.5% of the tumor mass is composed of bystander cells. These findings define levels of E. coli PNP expression necessary for antitumor activity with F-araAMP and demonstrate new potential for a clinically approved compound in solid tumor therapy.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The mechanisms by which Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) mediates prodrug cleavage and tumor regressions have become increasingly well understood (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . Although reversible phosphorolysis of (2'-deoxy) purine ribonucleosides to free base and (2'-deoxy) ribose-1-phosphate is a shared property of prokaryotic and eukaryotic PNPs, the mammalian enzymes differ fundamentally in sequence, structure, and function from their bacterial counterparts (3, 4, 5 , 7) . An important difference is the ability of E. coli PNP (but not the mammalian enzyme) to cleave adenosine analogs. Expression of E. coli PNP in cancer cells mediates the glycosidic cleavage of nucleoside prodrugs to highly toxic adenine analogs. The toxins are activated to nucleotides in the cytosol by adenine phosphoribosyltransferase and are incorporated into cellular RNA, disrupting both RNA and protein synthesis. Cell death results over a period of days, causing RNA degradation and release of PNP toxins from nucleic acid pools into the extra-cellular space (1 , 6 , 8, 9, 10, 11) . Tumor cell killing in vitro exhibits dose and time dependence on both of the level of E. coli PNP expressed and the amount of toxin generated (6 , 8 , 10 , 11) .

The present experiments focused on in vivo activity of a less well studied E. coli PNP substrate, 9-(ß-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2-fluoroadenine (F-araA). E. coli PNP converts F-araA to 2-F-adenine (F-Ade) with a catalytic efficiency that is approximately 1,000-fold less than the prototypic E. coli PNP substrate, 9-(2-deoxy-ß-D-ribofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine (MeP-dR; ref. 2 , 11 ). The clinically used form of F-araA (i.e., fludarabine phosphate, F-araAMP) is rapidly converted in the blood to F-araA. F-araAMP is routinely used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has no therapeutic role in the treatment of solid tumors such as gliomas.

Fludarabine was selected in these experiments for a number of reasons. First, the compound (without E. coli PNP) has been studied extensively, and pharmacokinetics of the agent in animal models are well defined. Second, a convenient source of fludarabine is available (the drug can be purchased from a hospital pharmacy). Because there is no readily available source, MeP-dR has required chemical synthesis in our laboratories in the past for in vivo studies. A commercial supply of GMP-grade E. coli PNP substrate would be expected to facilitate preclinical testing in animal models. Third, a safety profile already exists for fludarabine in human subjects, a feature that would be expected to promote testing of E. coli PNP in the clinic. Finally, early in vivo experiments suggested that fludarabine might be a useful compound for mediating tumor regressions with E. coli PNP (ref. 11 , see also below).

Little information is available concerning the in vivo limits to bystander killing with E. coli PNP and F-araAMP or the safety of F-araAMP in this setting. Measurements of intratumoral PNP activity after in vivo delivery of E. coli PNP to tumors and studies of PNP transgene expression in non-target tissue such as liver after viral delivery have not been conducted previously. We therefore performed a series of experiments to address the following questions. First, how effectively can F-araAMP mediate antitumor effects in vivo after vector-based delivery of E. coli PNP, and how potent is bystander killing by this approach? We examined intratumoral levels of E. coli PNP, ectopic (intrahepatic) expression, and the dose dependence of these effects. Second, how well do intermediate end points (intratumoral levels of E. coli PNP enzyme, accumulation of radiolabeled F-araA metabolites, and intratumoral enzyme distribution) predict tumor regressions and cures with E. coli PNP/F-araAMP. Because in vivo bystander killing with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase, cytosine deaminase, and other suicide gene products has been difficult to standardize with different vectoring strategies, we designed the present analysis to evaluate antitumor efficacy using three independent expression constructs (adenovirus, MuLv, and lentivirus). The findings indicate strong bystander killing and tumor regressions in a fashion that exhibits in vivo dose dependence on both intratumoral levels of E. coli PNP and the dose of F-araAMP administered.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction of Recombinant Adenovirus Encoding E. coli PNP.
The E. coli PNP gene was excised from pSV-PNP (12) with BamHI and inserted into the pACCMVpLpA adenoviral transfer vector (a gift of Dr. R. D. Gerard). Recombinant adenovirus was constructed by co-transfecting 293 cells in 6-well plates with the plasmid pJM17 (Microbix, Ontario, Canada) and pACCMVpLpA-PNP (13) . A kit from Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, CA) was used to purify adenoviral DNA from 200 µL of tissue culture supernatant. PCR-based screening (by viral DNA as template) with PNP-specific primers was used to identify recombinant adenovirus, and recombinants were plaque-purified by interactive infection of 293 cells with serially diluted viral stocks from single plaques. Functional expression of PNP from recombinant virus was confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of infected cells (see below). Adenovirus encoding E. coli PNP (Ad-PNP) was titered after CsCl gradient centrifugation (14) , and E1-specific primers that produce products only in the presence of replication competent adenovirus (15) were used to exclude replication competent adenovirus by a PCR-based assay. The same techniques and an otherwise similar vector backbone were used to construct a control recombinant adenovirus expressing EGFP (enhanced green fluorescence protein, Ad-EGFP).

Measurement of E. coli PNP Activity.
Crude cell extracts were prepared as described previously (9 , 10) from D54MG (human glioma) cells transduced with the E. coli PNP. The extracts were incubated with various concentrations of MeP-dR, and the formation of product was measured by HPLC analysis of the reaction mixture (16) . Activity was expressed as PNP units; one unit represents 1 nmol MeP-dR-converted/mg tumor cell extract/hour.

Intratumoral Inoculation of Recombinant Adenovirus and EGFP Detection.
Ad-PNP or Ad-EGFP were inoculated directly into tumors [0.25–2 billion plaque forming units (PFU) in 50 µL, 27-gauge needle] along four separate needle tracks. Tumors were approximately 250 mg at the time of inoculation. A subset of animals inoculated with Ad-EGFP were sacrificed, the tumors were embedded in OCT media (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned. Tumor sections were studied by two independent protocols. In the first, a Leitz Epifluorescent microscope was used to monitor the expression of EGFP based on green fluorescence of the reporter gene. In the second, tumor sections were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde at room temperature for 20 minutes and washed with PBS (pH 7.4) three times. After blocking of the nonspecific protein-binding sites with goat serum (diluted 1:20 in PBS) for 30 minutes, monoclonal antibody to green fluorescent protein (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) was added at a dilution of 1:100. After 1 hour of incubation and subsequent washing steps, a secondary antibody (antimouse AlexaFluor 586, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was added at 1:400 dilution and incubated for 1 hour. The sections were then washed three times, and a Leitz Epifluorescent microscope with a Photometrics SenSys digital camera and IPLab Spectrum software (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA) was used for visualization.

Measurement of Tumor Regressions.
Human glioma (D54MG) tumor cells, with or without stably-transduced E. coli PNP were selected because (a) the tumor is quite slow growing in vivo (doubling time approximately 15 days), making this a stringent model for examining bystander killing of resting phase tumor cells; (b) adenovirus, herpes virus, and other viruses have been used in the past to select human gliomas as a clinical target for suicide gene therapy; and (c) low level PNP expressing cells described previously were available for comparison (11) . Tumor cells (2 x 107) were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of nude mice (nu/nu) purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Tumors were measured with calipers, and an estimate of weight (mg) was calculated as described previously (11) . Mice were evaluated for weight loss, tumor mass, and overall appearance twice weekly. MeP-dR was made in our laboratories according to the method described by Montgomery and Rosman (17) . F-araAMP was obtained from Schering A.-G. (Berlin, Germany). All animal tumor regression studies were conducted according to NCI standard procedures. Each depicted curve represents the median tumor size from six animals, and each tumor regression study has been confirmed.

F-Ade Injection into Pre-established Tumors.
Susceptibility to F-Ade was determined in tumors implanted subcutaneously in the flanks of mice as described above. Tumors of approximately 300 mg were injected intratumorally in a delivery volume of 100 µL.

Intratumoral Measurements of F-araAMP and Metabolites.
D54MG parental or D54MG tumor cells expressing E. coli PNP were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of nu/nu mice, as described above. When the tumors were 300 to 400 mg, the mice received injection intraperitoneally with 100 mg/kg (1.4 Ci/mol) [3H]F-araAMP (Moravek Biochemicals Inc., Brea, CA), and the radioactivity in tumors was determined 4 hours later as described previously (1 , 10) . We have shown previously (10) that total radioactivity 4 hours after injection is a reliable indicator of F-Ade metabolites in tumor tissues in vivo and that radioactive compounds recovered from tumors under these conditions represent F-araA metabolites. The labeled compounds in tumor extracts exhibit both specificity and dose dependence on the level of intratumoral E. coli PNP. Further efforts to analyze the tumor extracts did not reveal any more information than was indicated by the HPLC assay as originally described (10) , because of degradation of relevant compounds during the extraction process.

For experiments in which adenovirus was used, labeled compound was injected 48 hours after viral administration. The tumors were dissolved in 1 ml soluene 350 (Packard Instrument Company, Meriden, CT) by incubating at 55°C for 4 hours and then at room temperature until dissolved. A portion of each extract was mixed with scintillation fluid, and the radioactivity was determined. Four tumors were removed for each measurement.

Production of Recombinant Lentivirus Expressing PNP.
Plasmids generously provided by the Trono laboratory (Geneva, Switzerland) were used to perform lentivirus construction according to the method of Trono et al. (18) . To establish a lentivirus capable of PNP expression, the gene was PCR amplified by primers 5'-ggatccaccatggctaccccacacattaatg-3' (BamHI site and ATG underlined) and 5'-cctcgagtcactctttatcgcccagcag-3' (XhoI site underlined). The resulting product was subcloned into Zero-Blunt vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After digestion with BamHI and XhoI, the luciferase gene in the pHR'CMVLuc W Sin-18 lentivirus vector was replaced with E. coli PNP. Correct insertion was verified (a) by sequencing the entire PNP gene and the ligation sites; (b) by transfecting the resulting plasmid, which encodes a CMV promoter-driven PNP gene, into 293T cells; and (c) by verifying E. coli PNP enzymatic activity by HPLC in vitro (see above). A total of 40 µg of plasmid DNA was used for calcium-phosphate transfection of one 10-cm dish. The DNA mixture contained 5 µg of envelope-coding plasmid pMD.G; 15 µg of the packaging plasmid pCMVDR8.91, which expresses Gag, Pol, Tat, and Rev; and 20 µg of transfer vector plasmid. Replication-deficient viral particles encoding E. coli PNP were collected from tissue culture supernatant after transfection, and a Beckman SW-28 rotor sucrose cushion centrifugation was used to concentrate lentivirus stock 1,000-fold with one round of centrifugation at 26,000 RPM for 90 minutes at 8°C. After 2 hours of incubation on ice, the virus was resuspended into serum-free medium. Titer of lentivirus reaches approximately 1 x 109 infectious particles/ml following concentration by this method, and replication-deficient viral particles encoding E. coli PNP were collected from tissue culture supernatant after transfection.

Recombinant lentivirus encoding PNP was used to generate clonal D54MG human glioma cells with high level transgene expression. Briefly, 5 x 104 D54MG cells were seeded into individual wells of 6-well plates and infected with recombinant lentivirus. Clonal cells were obtained by limit-diluting the pool of infected cells into 96-well plates. Cell clones were tested and confirmed for E. coli PNP activity both by HPLC and a conventional cell-killing assay in the presence of MeP-dR in vitro.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Delivery to Glioma Tumors by Adenovirus.
In vivo activity following PNP gene transfer is shown in Fig. 1ACitation . Ad-PNP conferred dose-dependent PNP expression in human glioma tumors after direct intratumoral inoculation of the virus. Injection of adenovirus through needle tracks also delivered PNP to other (extratumoral) tissues, as indicated by E. coli PNP measurements in liver. To examine antitumor effects conferred by E. coli PNP, F-araAMP was administered systemically to animals bearing tumors expressing recombinant enzyme. The results shown in Fig. 1BCitation indicate that tumor growth slows significantly because of E. coli PNP expression in solid tumors followed by prodrug dosing.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. A, dose-dependent E. coli PNP expression mediated by adenovirus in vivo. Nu/nu mice bearing D54MG tumors (approximately 300 mg) were inoculated intratumorally with a replication-defective Ad encoding the E. coli PNP gene. Forty-eight hours later, animals were sacrificed and E. coli PNP activity in tumors and livers measured by HPLC. The values are presented as PNP units. No PNP activity was detected in vehicle-treated (control) D54MG tumors or livers. Values are mean ± SEM. B, antitumor effects of F-araAMP after delivery of E. coli PNP by Ad-PNP. D54MG human glioma tumors were injected with Ad-PNP (2 x 109 PFU, {circ}) or saline ({bullet}). Ad-PNP together with F-araAMP treatment conferred slowing of tumor growth ({blacktriangleup}). Effects on tumor growth were observed in these studies without excessive weight loss (<5%) or other undesired sequelae. F-araAMP therapy was administered 48 hours after viral inoculation.

 
An adenovirus in which E. coli PNP was substituted to express EGFP in an otherwise identical virus was used to visually confirm tumor transduction. EGFP expression was examined by both fluorescence of the protein and anti-EGFP monoclonal antibody binding. Excellent concordance between the two methods for detecting EGFP was observed. Because the transgene was administered by intratumoral inoculation, EGFP expression concentrated in regions surrounding needle tracks. In areas where EGFP expression was highest, >50% of the cells expressed the protein as shown by both EGFP fluorescence and anti-EGFP antibody detection (Fig. 2)Citation . Negligible evidence of expression was observed outside areas of direct inoculation. Overall, <10% of the tumor cells expressed the reporter gene. Tumors treated with control (no EGFP) adenovirus demonstrated no fluorescence signal (data not shown).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Transgene localization after tumor inoculation of adenovirus. A and B, representative areas of D54MG tumors stained with anti-EGFP antibody (red) and overlapping EGFP fluorescence 48 hours after Ad-EGFP inoculation (2 x 109 PFU). C, EGFP fluorescence without antibody staining. D, negative control for antibody staining (non-immune serum). No PNP activity was detected in these tumors.

 
The data in Fig. 1Citation and 2Citation indicate F-araAMP-dependent killing of tumor cells not expressing E. coli PNP (bystander killing). To further delineate limits of bystander killing with F-araA and to test specificity of these results, we studied stably-transduced D54MG tumors. Figure 3Citation describes substantial activity of fludarabine against MuLv-transduced tumors, in which E. coli PNP is expressed from an SV40-driven promoter (11) . We next expressed E. coli PNP, using a third, independent (lentiviral) vector system. Lentivirus confers a very high level expression in epithelia compared with first-generation adenoviral constructs, as well as those derived from MuLv. In Fig. 4ACitation , the lentiviral expression system is used to depict a study in which 100% of cells express E. coli PNP at high levels (126,000 units). Complete regression and cures of tumors (12 of 12) were obtained with F-araAMP under these conditions. Tumors established from lower proportions of PNP-expressing cells (10%, 5%, 2.5%) exhibited dose dependence on both the amount of prodrug added (Fig. 4B)Citation and the intratumoral PNP activity (Fig. 4C)Citation . Antitumor effects were observed with F-araAMP when as few as 2.5% of tumor cells in vivo expressed PNP (average PNP activity ~3600 units).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. F-araAMP inhibits tumors expressing E. coli PNP after MuLv transduction. Tumors in which 100% of cells express E. coli PNP were treated with F-araAMP ({circ}) or untreated ({bullet}). The delay to two doublings attributable to F-araAMP treatment and PNP expression from an MuLv vector was >48 days. F-araAMP has no effect on parental (non-transduced) D54MG tumors (data not shown). Complete tumor regressions were observed without excessive weight loss (none >20%), lethality, or other undesired sequelae. PNP activity in MuLv-transduced tumors was 240 units.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. A, antitumor activity of F-araAMP in mice bearing lentivirus-transduced D54MG tumors. Tumors in which 100% of cells expressed high levels of E. coli PNP (from a lentiviral construct) were treated with 0, 50, or 100 mg/kg F-araAMP (every 2 hours x 5; every day for 3 days). Six animals were studied per treatment group. All animals in both F-araAMP-treated groups were cured of their tumors. Tumor regressions were observed in these studies without excessive weight loss or other undesired sequelae. PNP activity in these tumors was 126,000 units. Administration of F-araAMP at either dose did not alter growth of D54MG tumors expressing a control transgene [green fluorescent protein expressed from a lentivirus (not shown)]. In B, tumors were established from an inoculum in which 10% of cells expressed E. coli PNP. Expression at the time of drug treatment was confirmed by measurement of enzymatic activity within the tumor, indicating a level of 8,300 PNP units. Antitumor efficacy was greater at 100 mg/kg F-araAMP ({circ}) than at 50 mg/kg ({blacktriangleup}). In C, D54MG glioma tumors were established with decreasing proportions of PNP expressing cells [and increasing nonexpressing (parental) cells]. Delays in tumor growth exhibited dependence on the percentage of PNP-transduced cells. Open symbols, F-araAMP therapy; closed symbols, no prodrug therapy; circles, 2.5%; triangles, 5%, and squares, 10% PNP-transduced cells. In D, F-Ade was administered intratumorally through four needle tracks in a delivery volume of 100 µL. The MTD of F-Ade given by this route is approximately 90 mg/kg.

 
Direct toxin injection was tested as a comparison to the adenoviral gene transfer experiments described in Fig. 1Citation . As shown in Fig. 4DCitation , treatment by direct intratumoral inoculation of F-Ade failed to slow tumor progression at a maximally tolerated dose. Accumulation of F-araA metabolites in glioma tumors transduced with E. coli PNP is shown in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Accumulation of F-araA metabolites in tumors following E. coli PNP expression

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In contrast to other suicide genes, bystander killing by E. coli PNP does not use gap junctions or related cell-cell communication systems and therefore does not require structures that may be poorly expressed in many tumor types (6 , 8 , 9 , 11) . Moreover, because the plasma half-life of fludarabine in experiments such as those shown above is <1 hour, and the tumor doubling time is approximately 15 days, our results indicate that E. coli PNP/fludarabine is capable of destroying the quiescent (non-cycling) compartment of tumor cells in vivo. The toxin generated by E. coli PNP works quite differently from ganciclovir monophosphate or 5-flurouracil (toxins generated by herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase and cytosine deaminase suicide gene products, respectively), in that F-Ade impairs one or more enzymes unrelated to DNA synthesis and kills cells that are not actively proliferating. The mechanism of action is also quite different from all of the compounds currently used in the treatment of cancer (1 , 8 , 19, 20, 21, 22) .

One goal of the present experiments was to evaluate a recombinant virus and examine the efficiency of E. coli PNP transduction. The results demonstrate that adenovirus confers dose-dependent expression of functional enzyme in vivo (Fig. 1)Citation . The data depicted in Figs. 1Citation and 2Citation indicates that adenovirus encoding E. coli PNP can elicit substantial tumor cell killing and slow tumor growth after F-araAMP administration, despite the expected tendency to express transgene primarily along inoculation sites. Ectopic expression of E. coli PNP (e.g., adenoviral infection of liver) was well tolerated after systemic dosing of F-araAMP in this setting. The data in Fig. 1Citation therefore points to both safety and substantial bystander killing by E. coli PNP/F-araAMP.

Antitumor effects with E. coli PNP exhibit dependence on both the level of prodrug administered (Fig. 4B)Citation and the total amount of PNP activity present within solid tumors (Fig. 4C)Citation . As few as 2.5% of tumor cells expressing the PNP gene at high levels led to strong tumor responses. On the basis of adeno- and lentiviral studies in D54MG tumors, a transfection rate in which 2–5% of cells express PNP at sufficient levels of activity (e.g. 2,000–3,000 units) can be considered a benchmark for impairing tumor growth. The lentivirus protocol used at higher levels of expression led to tumor cures (for example, when 5–10% of cells express the transgene, Fig. 4CCitation ). Intratumoral F-araA metabolites above ~400 nmol/g tumor tissue were also associated with potent tumor regressions and cures (Table 1)Citation . The data in Table 1Citation demonstrates specificity and dose dependence on intratumoral levels of E. coli PNP expression, and describes a useful end point for monitoring PNP therapy in vivo.

Transduction of D54MG cells with a first-generation retrovirus (MuLv) led to E. coli PNP expression levels approximately 500-fold less than the levels observed with lentivirus. In tumors established from MuLv and comprised of 100% PNP expressing cells (i.e., no bystander killing required), substantially lower PNP levels than those described above (and correspondingly less toxin accumulation) effectively impaired tumor growth (Fig. 3)Citation . This is likely because of more potent killing of PNP-transduced (compared with bystander) cells, as we have reported earlier for other E. coli PNP substrates (ref. 6 ).7 Adenovirus and lentivirus (3,000–8,000 PNP units, 2–10% transduced cells) were used to compare tumors with similar levels of PNP activity and percentages of cells transduced and similar delays in tumor growth were observed (Figs. 1Citation and 4CCitation ).

Fludarabine has been reported to confer antitumor activity in an earlier study of E. coli PNP expression in hepatic tumors (23) and in glioma tumors transduced ex vivo (11) . The results (Fig. 1Citation , 3Citation , and 4)Citation establish that toxic compounds such as F-Ade can be liberated in tumor tissues by the action of PNP and cure malignancies without untoward toxicity to the host. Tumor regressions with F-Ade cannot be attained simply by intratumoral injection (Fig. 4D)Citation , presumably because of escape of the compound to the systemic circulation, leakage onto skin at the inoculation site, limited distribution of F-Ade along needle tracks, or some combination of these factors. Intracranial tumors such as glioma are difficult to access for repeat administration of anticancer agents in vivo. At least insofar as a single administration is concerned, the results in Fig. 4Citation support F-araA activation by E. coli PNP (rather than F-Ade injection) in glioma and other deep parenchymal tumors not well suited for repetitive instillations in human subjects in vivo.

Our studies in mice indicate (a) continued weight gain and normal growth curves in treated animals with otherwise substantial tumor burdens; (b) absence of lethality with any of three vector systems (MuLv, lentivirus, or adenovirus) used to deliver E. coli PNP; and (c) normal activity levels, grooming characteristics, and so forth in large groups of mice treated and/or cured of their tumors. If toxicity because of expression of E. coli PNP occurs, it has not limited the ability to obtain durable antitumor responses without evidence of untoward sequelae by these criteria. However, it should be noted that fludarabine and metabolites, like most clinically approved anticancer agents, cause bone marrow suppression at standard doses. Adenoviral vectors can elicit hepatocellular injury in vivo. Formal toxicology will therefore be necessary before applying the E. coli PNP strategy to cancer therapy in human subjects.

In conclusion, this study establishes a scientific foundation for understanding and optimizing tumor cell bystander killing with E. coli PNP, including variables that help predict tumor regressions and cures. The data demonstrate antitumor activity with three different vectoring systems and point to new use for a clinically approved chemotherapy (fludarabine) in solid tumors. Bystander killing of the magnitude described here has been difficult to establish for any suicide gene in the past. A variety of emerging gene transfer vehicles (e.g., replicating adenovirus, herpes virus, retrovirus, and measles virus) may be capable of transducing 2 to 10% of tumor cells in vivo. The data presented here provide a new means for understanding bystander killing with E. coli PNP and F-araAMP and for applying E. coli PNP to systems such as these in the future.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Mikelle Foster, Jane Schell, Carolyn Cox, and Eddie Walthall for help preparing the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: This work was funded through NCI CA 67763.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Eric J. Sorscher, 1918 University Boulevard (798 MCLM), Birmingham, AL 35294-0005. Phone: 205-934-9640; Fax: 205-934-7593; E-mail: sorscher{at}uab.edu

7 E. Sorscher and W. Parker, unpublished observations. Back

Received 1/ 5/04. Revised 7/ 8/04. Accepted 7/19/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Parker WB, Allan PW, Shaddix SC, et al Metabolism and metabolic actions of 6-methylpurine and 2-fluoroadenine in human cells. Biochem Pharmacol, 1998;55:1673-81, [CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Secrist JA, Parker WB, Allan PW, et al Gene therapy of cancer: activation of nucleoside prodrugs with E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Nucleosides and Nucleotides, 1999;18:745-57, [Medline]
  3. Mao C, Cook WJ, Zhou M, et al The crystal structure of Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase: a comparison with the human enzyme reveals a conserved topology. Structure, 1997;5:1373-83, [Medline]
  4. Ealick SE, Rule SA, Carter DC, et al Three-dimensional structure of human erythrocytic purine nucleoside phosphorylase at 3.2 A resolution. J Biol Chem, 1990;265:1812-20, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jensen KF, Nygaard P. Purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Purification and some properties. Eur J Biochem, 1975;51:253-65, [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hughes BW, King SA, Allan PW, et al Cell to cell contact is not required for bystander cell killing by E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. J Biol Chem, 1998;273:2322-8, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bennett EM, Anand R, Allan PW, et al Designer gene therapy using an Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase/prodrug system. Chem Biol, 2003;10:1173-81, [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hughes B, Parker WB, Gadi VK, et al Tumor specific killing with high bystander toxicity using the human tyrosinase promoter to express the E. coli PNP gene. Cancer Res, 1995;55:3339-45, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sorscher EJ, Peng S, Bebok Z, et al Tumor cell bystander killing in colonic carcinoma utilizing the E. coli Deo D gene and generation of toxic purines. Gene Ther, 1994;1:233-8, [Medline]
  10. Parker WB, Allan PW, Hassan AEA, et al Anti-tumor activity of 2-fluoro-2'-deoxyadenosine against tumors that express E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Cancer Gene Ther, 2003;10:23-9, [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Parker WB, King SA, Allan PW, et al In vivo gene therapy of cancer with E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Hum Gene Ther, 1997;8:1637-44, [Medline]
  12. Gadi VK, Alexander SD, Waud WR, et al A long-acting suicide gene toxin, 6-methylpurine, inhibits slow growing tumors after a single administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2003;304:1280-4, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Becker TC, Noel RJ, Coats WS, et al Use of recombinant adenovirus for metabolic engineering of mammalian cells. Methods Cell Biol, 1994;43:161-89,
  14. Adenovirus methods and protocols Wold WSM. eds. . Methods in molecular medicine, 1999;vol. 21: Humana Press Totowa, New Jersey
  15. Zhang WW, Koch PE, Roth JA. Detection of wild-type contamination in a recombinant adenoviral preparation by PCR. Biotechniques, 1995;18:444-7, [Medline]
  16. Gadi VK, Alexander SD, Kudlow JE, et al In vivo sensitization of ovarian tumors to chemotherapy by expression E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase in a small fraction of tumor cells. Gene Ther, 2000;7:1738-43, [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Montgomery AD, Rosman GJ. Analogs of 6-methyl-9-ß-D-ribofuranosylpurine. J Med Chem, 1968;11:48-52, [CrossRef][Medline]
  18. http://www.tronolab.unige.ch/x_home2.htm.
  19. Lockett LJ, Molloy PL, Russell PJ, Both GW. Relative efficiency of tumor cell killing in vitro by two enzyme-prodrug systems delivered by identical adenovirus vectors. Clin Cancer Res, 1997;3:2075-80, [Abstract]
  20. Park BJ, Brown CK, Hu Y, et al Augmentation of melanoma-specific gene expression using a tandem melanocyte-specific enhancer results in increased cytotoxicity of the purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene in melanoma. Hum Gene Ther, 1999;10:889-98, [CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Krohne TU, Shankara S, Geissler M, et al Mechanisms of cell death induced by suicide genes encoding purine nucleoside phosphorylase and thymidine kinase in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Hepatology, 2001;34:511-8, [CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Martiniello-Wilks R, Garcia-Aragon J, Daja MM, et al In vivo gene therapy for prostate cancer: preclinical evaluation of two different enzyme-directed prodrug therapy systems delivered by identical adenovirus vectors. Hum Gene Ther, 1998;9:1617-26, [Medline]
  23. Mohr L, Shankara S, Yoon SK, et al Gene therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo in nude mice by adenoviral transfer of the Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene. Hepatology, 2000;31:606-14, [CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Afshar, T. Asai, and S. L. Morrison
Humanized ADEPT comprised of an engineered human purine nucleoside phosphorylase and a tumor targeting peptide for treatment of cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2009; 8(1): 185 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sorscher, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sorscher, E. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online