Cancer Research Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, D. P.
[Cancer Research 64, 6660-6665, September 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Combination Therapy with Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus and Replication Defective Adenovirus

Choon-Taek Lee1,2, Kyung-Ho Park1, Kiyoshi Yanagisawa1, Yasushi Adachi1, Joyce E. Ohm1, Sorena Nadaf1, Mikhail M. Dikov1, David T. Curiel3 and David P. Carbone1

1 Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lung Institute of Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Respiratory Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; and 3 Gene Therapy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Low gene transfer rate is the most substantial hurdle in the practical application of gene therapy. One strategy to improve transfer efficiency is the use of a conditionally replicating adenovirus (CRAD) that can selectively replicate in tumor cells. We hypothesized that conventional E1-deleted adenoviruses (ad) can become replication-competent when cotransduced with a CRAD to selectively supply E1 in trans in tumors. The resulting selective production of large numbers of the E1-deleted ad within the tumor mass will increase the transduction efficiency. We used a CRAD ({Delta}24RGD) that produces a mutant E1 without the ability to bind retinoblastoma but retaining viral replication competence in cancer cells with a defective pRb/p16. Ad-lacZ, adenovirus-luciferase (ad-luc), and adenovirus insulin-like growth factor-1R/dominant-negative (ad-IGF-1R/dn; 482, 950) are E1-deleted replication-defective adenoviruses. The combination of CRAD and ad-lacZ increased the transduction efficiency of lacZ to 100% from 15% observed with ad-lacZ alone. Transfer of media of CRAD and ad-lacZ cotransduced cells induced the transfer of lacZ (media transferable bystander effect). Combination of CRAD and ad-IGF-1R/dn increased the production of truncated IGF-1R or soluble IGF-1R > 10 times compared with transduction with ad-IGF-1R/dn alone. Combined intratumoral injection of CRAD and ad-luc increased the luciferase expression about 70 times compared with ad-luc alone without substantial systemic spread. Combined intratumoral injection of CRAD and ad-IGF-1R/482 induced stronger growth suppression of established lung cancer xenografts than single injections. The combination of CRAD and E1-deleted ad induced tumor-specific replication of CRAD and E1-deleted ad and increased the transduction rate and therapeutic efficacy of these viruses in model tumors.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Gene therapy was introduced as a new treatment modality for cancer more than a decade ago. Despite initial enthusiasm and excellent results in animal tumor models, the practical impact of gene therapy in clinics is disappointing. One reason for the lack of clinical success with gene therapy is the low gene transfer rate observed. In a human tumor mass, it is very difficult to transfer the therapeutic gene to even the majority of tumor cells with currently available gene transfer vectors. The intratumoral dispersion of replication-defective viral vectors is usually confined to the injection site (1) , resulting in impractical and ineffective schemes for dozens of injections into tumors in clinical trials. The bystander effect of prodrug-activating enzyme slightly increases the effect of therapeutic gene transfer, but the efficacy is limited by the efficacy of the activated drug (2 , 3) .

One strategy for overcoming this problem is the use of a conditionally replicating adenovirus (CRAD) that can selectively replicate in tumor cells (4 , 5) . The antitumor effect of most CRAD depends on the antitumor effects intrinsic to adenovirus replication in tumor cells and dissemination through tumor mass.

Comparative studies between CRAD and replication-defective viruses have shown CRAD to induce higher and more prolonged expression of transgenes (6) . However, clinical studies with CRAD failed to show striking results although some responses were observed (7 , 8) . Most of these viruses cannot carry a therapeutic gene because of size constraints. Furthermore, the genetic heterogeneity of tumors is the problem for this approach because typical CRAD can replicate only in p53-mutated (4 , 5 , 9) , pRB/p16 pathway-inactivated cells (10, 11, 12) , or cells expressing a specific protein (CRAD containing cancer-specific promoters such as the telomerase promoter; refs. 13 and 14 ).

Another strategy is the use of CRAD engineered to also express a therapeutic gene inserted into the E1 or E3 region of adenovirus (an "armed" therapeutic virus; refs. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ). This strategy enhances the therapeutic effects of CRAD by coexpression of the therapeutic gene; however, the problem of low gene transfer rate is still limiting because the effect of the therapeutic gene is confined to the cells transduced with the CRAD.

Here we hypothesized that a conventional replication-defective adenovirus containing an E1 deletion can become replication-competent when cotransduced with a CRAD that would supply E1 in trans. The resulting selective production of large numbers of the therapeutic adenovirus in situ within a tumor mass could transduce neighboring tumor cells and increase the overall transduction efficiency.

The basic idea of this study has already been reported. Habib et al. (23) demonstrated that the combination of replication competent adenovirus with replication-defective adenovirus with reporter genes (green florescent protein and luciferase) induced the replication of reporter viruses.

In these studies, we used a CRAD designated {Delta}24RGD that produces a mutant E1 protein without the ability to bind retinoblastoma (Rb) but retaining viral replication competence. This E1 can theoretically only function and permit viral replication in cancer cells with a defective pRb/p16 pathway. Also, this {Delta}24RGD contains a Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence, known to interact with {alpha}v integrins, in adenoviral fiber that facilitate adenoviral entry to cells regardless of Coxsackie adenoviral receptor (24) .

For the replication-defective therapeutic adenovirus, we tested adenoviruses expressing a dominant-negative insulin-like growth factor-1R (ad-IGF-1R/dn) with a stop codon at codon 950 (ad-IGF-1R/950) or 482 (ad-IGF-1R/482) for the genetic blockade of IGF-1. IGF-1 is very important growth factor essential for the cancer growth. We have already demonstrated that these adenoviruses effectively blocked the IGF-1 pathway in cancer cells and that intratumoral injection of ad-IGF-1R/482 [1 x 109 plaque-forming unit(s) (pfu) x 5 times] suppresses growth of lung cancer xenografts (25) by effectively blocking IGF-1 signaling.

In this study, we showed that combined transduction with {Delta}24RGD and an ad-IGF-1R/dn increased the transduction efficiency and therapeutic efficacy of either approach alone on lung cancer xenografts.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recombinant Adenoviruses.
{Delta}24RGD was constructed in the Gene Therapy Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. This virus contains E1A with a 24-bp deletion in the CR2 region and E3 with an RGD-4C modification of the fiber gene. The CR2 domain is responsible for binding pRb that allows the adenovirus-infected cell to enter S phase. Therefore adenoviruses with a deletion in this region can replicate only in the cells with defects in the pRb/p16 pathway where this binding is not necessary. Furthermore, the RGD-4C motif in the E3 region enables this virus to infect cells without binding to Coxsackie adenoviral receptor (24) .

We have previously described the construction of adenoviruses expressing IGF-1R/dn, 950 amino acids, or 482 amino acids in length (25) . Ad-IGF-1R/950 produced truncated IGF-1R receptor on the cell surface, and ad-IGF-1R/482 produced and secreted a defective {alpha} subunit of IGF-1R. These ad-IGF-1R/950, 482, ad-lacZ, and adenovirus-luciferase (ad-luc) were driven by cytomegalovirus promoter and were replication defective by virtue of E1 deletion.

Increased In vitro Transduction Efficiency of ad-lacZ or ad-luc by Cotransduction with {Delta}24RGD.
To assess the change in transduction efficiency of ad-lacZ in combination with {Delta}24RGD in vitro, we transduced NCI H460 (human lung large cell carcinoma) with ad-lacZ [10 multiplicity of infection (moi)] alone or ad-lacZ (10 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (1 moi) together. Twenty-four hours after transduction, we measured the efficiencies of lacZ gene transfer by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) staining. The same experiment was performed with ad-luc (5 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (1 moi). Twenty-four hours after the transduction, the expression of firefly luciferase were measured by luciferase assay with Luciferase Assay System (E4030, Promega, Madison, WI) from cell lysates with the Luciferase Cell Culture Lysis Reagent (Promega).

The Presence of Intact ad-lacZ in the Media of ad-lacZ- and {Delta}24RGD-Transduced Cells.
After combined transduction with ad-lacZ (10 moi) with or without {Delta}24RGD (1 moi) in NCI H460, we washed the cells with PBS to remove the viruses remaining in solution. Twenty-four hours after transduction, we collected and concentrated the media by Centriplus-30 (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and then transferred this medium to uninfected NCI H460 cells. Twenty-four hours after the transfer, we performed X-gal staining to confirm the release of ad-lacZ into medium by counting the blue cells expressing lacZ.

The Expression of Transgenes Encoded by ad-IGF-1R/950 and 482 after Combined Transduction with {Delta}24RGD.
Transduction with ad-IGF-1R/950 results in the production of a truncated IGF-1R on the cell surface. We thus measured and compared IGF-1R cell surface expression by fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Twenty-four hours after combined transduction with ad-IGF-1R/950 (10 moi) with or without {Delta}24RGD (2 moi) in NCI H460 cells, we measured the IGF-1R expression by flow cytometry with the {alpha}IR3 antibody (Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA). The same experiment was repeated with ad-IGF-1R/482 (10 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (2 moi). We measured IGF-1R protein by Western blot assay with an antibody for the {alpha} subunit (anti-IGF-1R{alpha} N-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) from protein extracts of cells and media after transduction with ad-IGF-1R/482 and/or {Delta}24RGD because ad-IGF-1R/482 has been demonstrated to produce and release the truncated {alpha} subunit of IGF-1R into the medium.

Increased Transduction Efficiency and Transgene Expression of lacZ or Luciferase in Tumors after Coinjection of ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD.
We established subcutaneous xenograft tumors by injecting NCI H460 (1 x 106 cells/mouse) into the flank of nude mice. Seven days after injection, we injected ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu) with or without {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) into the palpable tumor mass. Seven days after adenoviral injection, we excised the tumor and stained with X-gal to measure expression of transduced lacZ activity.

With ad-luc, we performed a similar experiment except we induced bilateral subcutaneous tumors to evaluate both transduction efficiency and systemic spread of ad-luc to other organs and tumors at a distant site. Seven days after tumor cell injections into the subcutaneous tissue of both flanks, we injected ad-luc (1 x 107 pfu) with or without {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) into one tumor directly, and 1 week later we excised both tumors (treated and untreated), liver, lung, spleen, and kidney. We homogenized these tissues, mixed the homogenate with Luciferase Cell Culture Lysis Reagent (Promega) followed by emulsification. After centrifugation, we transferred 20 µL of supernatant into 100 µL of Luciferase Assay Reagent in a luminometer tube and assayed it in a luminometer (Luciferase Assay System, Promega). We measured the protein concentration of the supernatant with the Bradford method and compared the transduction efficiency by normalizing for relative light units per microgram of protein across samples (26) . The tumor mass and organs from untreated mice were used as background assays.

Growth Suppression after Combined Transduction with {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/dn (482, 950).
NCI H460 cells were plated into 6-well plates (2 x 104 cells/well). Twenty-four hours later, they were transduction with {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi), ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 moi), ad-IGF-1R/950 (1 moi), {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 moi), and {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/950 (1 moi). Cell numbers were counted with a hemocytometer and compared with untransduced controls for relative survival.

Tumor Treatment.
To investigate the effect of combination therapy on the treatment of established tumors, we performed intratumoral injections of {Delta}24RGD and/or ad-IGF-1R/482 into subcutaneous lung cancer xenografts established by injecting NCI H460 cells (1 x 106/mouse). After 7 days, intratumoral injection of ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu), {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu), ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 x 107 pfu), {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) + ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu), and {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) + ad-IGF1R/482 (1 x 107 pfu) were performed. We repeated the same injections 2 days after the initial injection. Then we measured the change in tumor size by the following formula (0.5 x length x width2).

The tumor growth of each group was analyzed by the repeated ANOVA test.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Enhancement of the In vitro Transduction Rate of ad-lacZ and ad-luc by Cotransduction with {Delta}24RGD.
We tested our hypothesis by measuring the gene transfer efficiency of ad-lacZ and ad-luc (replication defective by virtue of E1 deletion) in combination with {Delta}24RGD. Coadministration with {Delta}24RGD increased the transduction rate of lacZ from <15% to almost 100% (Fig. 1A)Citation . This is consistent with the replication of the E1-deleted ad-lacZ with the mutant E1 produced by {Delta}24RGD in cancer cells cotransduced with the combination. When we combined ad-luc with {Delta}24RGD, the luciferase assay showed an almost 90-fold-increased luciferase expression in {Delta}24RGD- and ad-luc-cotransduced cells than in cells transduced with ad-luc alone (Fig. 1B)Citation .



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Enhanced expression of lacZ and luciferase by combined transduction with {Delta}24RGD. A, increased transduction rates of ad-lacZ from 15 to 100% by combination with {Delta}24RGD. NCI H460 cells were infected with ad-lacZ (10 moi) alone or ad-lacZ (10 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (1 moi). X-gal staining was done after 24 hours. B, increased luciferase expression from ad-luc (5 moi) transduced cells by cotransduced {Delta}24RGD (1 moi). Twenty four hours after the transduction, the expression of luciferase was measured by luciferase assay with Luciferase Assay System (E4030, Promega) from the cell lysates. RLU, relative light units.

 
Presence of ad-lacZ in the Media from ad-lacZ- and {Delta}24RGD-Cotransduced Cells.
We confirmed the propagation and release of ad-lacZ from ad-lacZ- and {Delta}24RGD-cotransduced cells by transferring media conditioned by transduced cells to untransduced cancer cells. Control-conditioned media from NCI H460 cells transduced by ad-lacZ alone transferred lacZ into <1% of cells. However, medium from ad-lacZ- and {Delta}24RGD-cotransduced cells transferred lacZ to 20% of cells (Fig. 2)Citation . This finding confirmed the presence of intact ad-lacZ virions in the media, demonstrating the propagation and release of ad-lacZ from the cotransduced cells. This media-transferable bystander effect of replication-defective adenovirus is a very important characteristic of this strategy.



View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Media transferable bystander effect. NCI H460 cells were transduced with {Delta}24RGD alone (1 moi), ad-lacZ (10 moi) alone, or ad-lacZ (10 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (1 moi). After 24 hours, the media was collected and concentrated by Centriplus-30 and transferred to uninfected NCI H460 cells in culture. X-gal staining was done after 24 hours. A marked increase (from below 1 to 20%) in blue cells was found in cells treated with the media from ad-lacZ- and {Delta}24RGD-cotransduced cells. This demonstrates the presence of ad-lacZ in the media and supports the bystander effect.

 
Increased Transgene Expression by Adenovirus Containing Dominant-Negative IGF-1R by Cotransduction with {Delta}24RGD.
After cotransduction with {Delta}24RGD, ad-IGF-1R/950 transduction increased the expression of IGF-1R on NCI H460 cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorter from 55.66 to 164.29 (mean values, Fig. 3ACitation ). Western blotting revealed that cotransduction with ad-IGF-1R/482 and {Delta}24RGD increased the production of defective {alpha} subunit in these cells and media by 15.2 and 1.6-fold, respectively, when compared with ad-IGF-1R/482 alone (Fig. 3B)Citation .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. A, increased expression of IGF-1R on the cell surface by combined transduction with ad-IGF-1R/950 (10 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (2 moi). Twenty-four hours after the combined transduction with ad-IGF-1R/950 (10 moi) with or without {Delta}24RGD (2 moi) in NCI H460, we measured IGF-1R expression by flow cytometry. After cotransduction with {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/950, increased expression of IGF-1R was observed from 55.66 to 164.29 (mean fluorescence-activated cell sorter values). The expression in untreated cells was 7.47. B, increased production of soluble IGF-1R (truncated {alpha} chain) from {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/482 cotransduced NCI H460. Western blot assay was done from the cell lysate and conditioned medium after the transduction with ad-IGF-1R/482 (10 moi) with or without {Delta}24RGD (2 moi). Combined transduction with ad-IGF-1R/482 and {Delta}24RGD increased the expression of defective {alpha} subunit of IGF-1R in cell lysate by 15.2-fold and in concentrated media by 1.5-fold.

 
Increased Transduction Rate in Tumors after Coinjection with ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD.
We applied this strategy to an in vivo tumor model. Seven days after the injection of ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu) and {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) into palpable tumors, we stained the cut surface of the tumor with X-gal. Figure 4ACitation shows a representative section. Compared with very low transduction rate by ad-lacZ alone, the combination of ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD increased the transduction rate (represented by the blue staining area) dramatically.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. A, enhanced in vivo transduction efficiency by combined injection with ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD. After establishment of subcutaneous tumors by injecting NCI H460 (1 x 106 cells/mouse), we injected ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu) with or without {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) intratumorally. After 7 days, the tumor mass was excised and X-gal staining was done. The cut surface of the tumor treated with ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD showed a marked increase in lacZ transduction represented by the blue staining area. B, increased luciferase expression confined to injected tumor and the absence of systemic spread. We examined the biodistribution of ad-luc after combined injection with {Delta}24RGD. We established two lung cancer xenografts by subcutaneous injection of NCI H460 (1 x 106 cells into each flank). At day 7, ad-luc alone (1 x 107 pfu) or ad-luc + {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) were injected into one tumor. One week later, luciferase expression was measured in each tumor and other organs (liver, lung, spleen, kidney). Increased luciferase expression was found in the treated tumor mass, but no substantial expression was found in any other site. This demonstrates that substantial in situ propagation of ad-luc was confined to the treated tumor. No evidence of systemic spread was found. RLU, relative light units. {permzspch023}, Control; {blacksquare}, Ad-luc; {square}, CRAD+Ad-luc.

 
Increased Luciferase Expression was Confined to the Injected Tumor and the Absence of Systemic Spread.
The expression of luciferase in the tumor mass injected with {Delta}24RGD and ad-luc was 70 times higher than in the tumor injected with ad-luc alone. Pertinent to the safety of this approach is that no differences in luciferase expression were observed in the uninjected tumor or vital organs such as liver, spleen, lung, and kidney when compared with ad-luc-injected or -uninjected mice (Fig. 4B)Citation .

Enhanced In vitro Growth Suppression by Combining {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/dn.
A single transduction with ad-IGF-1R/482 or 950 showed only minimal growth suppression. {Delta}24RGD at a very low dose (0.1 moi) showed a modest and delayed oncolytic effect. However, combined transduction with {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/482 or 950 induced rapid and strong oncolysis that was evident from day 2 to day 6. By day 4, cells showed almost complete oncolysis. However, {Delta}24RGD alone induced complete oncolysis only after day 8 (Fig. 5)Citation .



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Enhanced growth suppression by combined transduction with {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/dn (482 or 950). We transduced NCI H460 cells with {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi), ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 moi), ad-IGF-1R/950 (1 moi), {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 moi), and {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/950 (1 moi). Cell numbers were counted by hemocytometer and compared with an untransduced control (relative survival). Combined transductions [{Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 moi) and {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi) + ad-IGF-1R/950 (1 moi)] induced more rapid and stronger oncolysis than {Delta}24RGD (0.1 moi), especially between day 2 and day 6 (P < 0.05), and ad-IGF-1R/dn (482, 950; P < 0.001). {zch018045318srt3}, Control; {permzspch158}, IGF-1R/482; {permzspch159}, IGF-1R/950; {permzspch157}, CRAD; {zch018045318srt1}, CRAD+IGF-1R/482; {zch018045318srt2}, CRAD+IGF-1R/950.

 
Improved Treatment of Established Tumors by Combined Treatment with ad-IGF-1R/dn and {Delta}24RGD.
Finally, we tested the efficacy of this combination on treatment in in vivo tumor model. Intratumoral injection of a single adenovirus (ad-lacZ, ad-IGF-1R/482) failed to show substantial tumor growth suppression. Even {Delta}24RGD injection also showed minimal growth suppression at this dose. However, combined injection with {Delta}24RGD and ad-lacZ showed some growth suppression. This finding suggests the propagation of ad-lacZ induced enhanced oncolysis although ad-luc itself is not very toxic to cancer cells. Furthermore, {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/482 combination showed significantly greater growth suppression than the {Delta}24RGD and ad-luc combination (P < 0.05, Fig. 6Citation ). Propagation of ad-IGF-1R/482 and subsequent IGF-1 signaling blockade by ad-IGF-1R/482 will be the explanation of this difference.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Combined treatment with ad-IGF-1R/482 and {Delta}24RGD showed increased in vivo antitumor activity. Seven days after subcutaneous injection of NCI H460 cells (1 x 106), intratumoral injection of ad-lacZ (1.0 x 107 pfu), {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu), ad-IGF-1R/482 (1 x 107 pfu), {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) + ad-lacZ (1 x 107 pfu), and {Delta}24RGD (1 x 107 pfu) + ad-IGF1R/482 (1 x 107pfu) were performed and repeated 2 days later. Ad-lacZ and ad-IGF-1R/482 alone failed to show any antitumor effect compared with control, and {Delta}24RGD alone showed only a weak antitumor effect (P < 0.05 compared with control). Ad-lacZ and {Delta}24RGD combination showed detectable antitumor activity over {Delta}24RGD (P < 0.05 between {Delta}24RGD and the {Delta}24RGD + ad-lacZ combination); however, ad-IGF-1R/482 and {Delta}24RGD showed the strongest antitumor activity (P < 0.05 between ad-lacZ + {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/482 + {Delta}24RGD). {zch018045318srt3}, Control; {permzspch158}, Ad-lacZ; {permzspch159}, CRAD; {permzspch157}, Ad-IGF-1R/482; {zch018045318srt1}, CRAD+Ad-lacZ; {permzspch154}, CRAD+Ad-IGF-1R/482.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we developed a new gene therapy strategy designed to overcome the low transduction rate in in vivo tumor masses. The discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo gene therapy experiments in large part arises from the low gene transfer rate into tumor masses, especially in humans. It is difficult to increase the transduction efficiency of conventional replication-defective adenoviruses because of limited infectivity and a limitation in the viral dose that can be tolerated by the host. In contrast, CRAD has the distinct advantage of propagating in tumor masses in situ and infecting adjacent tumor cells (10 , 27) . However, the absence of therapeutic genes and the molecular heterogeneity of tumors limits its clinical applicability.

Armed therapeutic adenoviruses can increase antitumor efficacy by expressing a therapeutic gene, usually in the E1 or E3 region (16 , 21 , 28 , 29) . However, this effect is still restricted to the tumor cells transduced with the oncolytic adenovirus. Therefore, the additional antitumor effect from the inserted gene is not striking.

Our strategy is different from the armed therapeutic adenovirus because we use another replication-defective adenovirus carrying a therapeutic gene instead of inserting the therapeutic gene into a CRAD. Our strategy has a definite advantage over current CRAD and armed therapeutic adenoviruses. This approach induces the propagation of replication-defective adenoviruses carrying a therapeutic gene within tumor cells by using the E1 protein from the cotransduced CRAD. High titers of therapeutic adenovirus, although it is replication-defective itself, can transduce adjacent tumor or stromal cells and kill them even if the CRAD did not infect or would not replicate in those cells. This results in an increase of the transduction efficiency and of the therapeutic efficacy. In other words, we used CRAD-transduced cells as a kind of in situ 293 cell, permitting the propagation of cotransduced E1-deleted and replication-defective adenovirus.

A concern about this approach is the possible competition of CRAD and conventional adenoviruses for infection of the same tumor cell. However, the {Delta}24RGD that we used as a CRAD has a RGD motif in the E3 protein that enables this virus to enter the cells without the help of Coxsackie adenoviral receptor. We confirmed this effect by demonstrating an increase in the transduction of lung cancer by ad-lacZ in in vitro (Fig. 1A)Citation and a 90-fold increase in luciferase expression (Fig. 1B)Citation by coadministration with {Delta}24RGD. This is indirect evidence of ad-lacZ and ad-luc replication by CRAD.

The presence of intact ad-lacZ in the media from the cells transduced with {Delta}24RGD and ad-lacZ is direct evidence of ad-lacZ replication and production. This is likely to occur by the replication-defective mutant virus using the E1 ({Delta}24) protein from {Delta}24RGD (Fig. 2)Citation . This feature is the theoretical basis of the bystander effect observed.

We confirmed this phenomenon again with the therapeutic viruses, ad-IGF-1R/950 and ad-IGF-1R/482. By combining these viruses with {Delta}24RGD, ad-IGF-1R/950 induced an increase in IGF-1R expression in tumor cells and ad-IGF-1R/482 induced increased expression of defective {alpha} subunit in both the transduced cells and, perhaps more importantly, in the media as well.

These findings effectively demonstrate that {Delta}24RGD induced the replication of the E1-deleted adenoviruses and induced increased transduction rates and transgene expression.

Safety could be an issue of this strategy because it relies on the propagation of adenovirus in a tumor in situ, and thus there is the possibility of uncontrolled propagation.

Wildner et al. (30) studied the dissemination of replication-competent ad-herpes simplex thymidine kinase after subcutaneous administration. They only found dermatitis and the presence of adenovirus at the injection site without any substantial presence of adenovirus in other organs.

Although a replication-defective therapeutic adenovirus becomes replication competent in this strategy, replication should be restricted to the tumor mass where the CRAD can replicate. The in vivo distribution assay described above using CRAD and ad-luc performed 7 days after injection demonstrated two important findings. The first is that we observed enhanced expression of luciferase from the tumor tissue coinjected with {Delta}24RGD and ad-luc. The other important finding is the absence of luciferase expression in the contralateral untreated tumor and other vital organs (lung, liver, spleen, and kidney), even in mice treated with {Delta}24RGD and ad-luc. These data suggest that there is no substantial systemic spread of the replication-defective ad-luc. Furthermore, the use of tumor-specific therapeutic genes or tumor-specific promoters may further enhance tumor specificity and avoid uncontrolled proliferation of adenovirus.

The enhanced and tumor-restricted expression of therapeutic genes demonstrated here resulted in an increased treatment efficacy in an animal tumor model in addition to the in vitro growth assay. In this treatment experiment, we used very low dose of ad-IGF-1R/482 (2 x 107 in total). Because of this low dose, ad-IGF-1R/482 alone showed little antitumor effect. {Delta}24RGD (2 x 107 in total) showed modest growth suppression. Combination of {Delta}24RGD and ad-lacZ also demonstrated a modest antitumor effect by enhanced oncolysis by ad-lacZ propagation. However, the combination of {Delta}24RGD and ad-IGF-1R/482 showed very strong tumor suppression over the combination of {Delta}24RGD and ad-lacZ. This finding reflected the antitumor effect of ad-IGF-1R/482 that was propagated in tumor mass.

Because these experiments were performed in immunocompromised hosts, anti-adenoviral immune responses in immunocompetent hosts may present another obstacle for viral propagation within the tumor mass if this strategy were applied to the clinic. However, the combination of CRAD and E1-deleted adenovirus with an immune cytokine in the immunocompetent host will be a very attractive combination strategy.

The combination of a CRAD and an E1-deleted adenovirus expressing a therapeutic gene showed a significantly greater antitumor effect although we didn’t compare it directly with an armed CRAD with the same therapeutic gene. Additional experiments will be needed to directly compare the effectiveness of a CRAD + E1-deleted adenovirus with a therapeutic gene and an armed therapeutic CRAD.

Thus we have identified a novel gene-therapeutic approach that significantly improved gene transfer and gene therapeutic efficacy in model tumors in vivo and that has potential for direct clinical applicability for a variety of tumor types and therapeutic genes.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Partly supported by the Vanderbilt Lung Cancer SPORE P50CA9049 (D. P. Carbone), the Martel Foundation pilot grant (C-T. Lee), and a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (03-PJ1-PG3-20800-0048; C-T. Lee).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: David P. Carbone, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-6838. Phone: 615-936-3321; Fax: 615-936-3322; E-mail: d.carbone{at}vanderbilt.edu

Received 4/ 5/04. Revised 6/20/04. Accepted 7/22/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ram Z, Culver KW, Oshiro EM, et al Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producing cells. Nat Med, 1997;3:1354-61, [CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Moolten FL. Tumor chemosensitivity conferred by inserted herpes thymidine kinase genes: paradigm for a prospective cancer control strategy. Cancer Res, 1986;46:5276-81, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Freeman SM, Abboud CN, Whartenby KA, et al The "bystander effect": tumor regression when a fraction of the tumor mass is genetically modified. Cancer Res, 1993;53:5274-83, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, et al An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science (Wash D C), 1996;274:373-6,
  5. Kirn D. Replication-selective oncolytic adenoviruses: virotherapy aimed at genetic targets in cancer. Oncogene, 2000;19:6660-9, [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ichikawa T, Chiocca EA. Comparative analyses of transgene delivery and expression in tumors inoculated with a replication-conditional or -defective viral vector. Cancer Res, 2001;61:5336-9, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Reid T, Warren R, Kirn D. Intravascular adenoviral agents in cancer patients: lessons from clinical trials. Cancer Gene Ther, 2002;9:979-86, [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ries S, Korn WM. ONYX-015: mechanisms of action and clinical potential of a replication- selective adenovirus. Br J Cancer, 2002;86:5-11, [CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kirn D. Oncolytic virotherapy for cancer with the adenovirus dl1520 (Onyx-015): results of phase I and II trials. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2001;1:525-38, [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Heise C, Hermiston T, Johnson L, et al An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacy. Nat Med, 2000;6:1134-9, [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Fueyo J, Gomez-Manzano C, Alemany R, et al A mutant oncolytic adenovirus targeting the Rb pathway produces anti-glioma effect in vivo. Oncogene, 2000;19:2-12, [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Jakubczak JL, Ryan P, Gorziglia M, et al An oncolytic adenovirus selective for retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein pathway-defective tumors: dependence on E1A, the E2F-1 promoter, and viral replication for selectivity and efficacy. Cancer Res, 2003;63:1490-9, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Huang TG, Savontaus MJ, Shinozaki K, Sauter BV, Woo SL. Telomerase-dependent oncolytic adenovirus for cancer treatment. Gene Ther, 2003;10:1241-7, [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Huang Q, Zhang X, Wang H, et al A novel conditionally replicative adenovirus vector targeting telomerase-positive tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res, 2004;10:1439-45, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hermiston T. Gene delivery from replication-selective viruses: arming guided missiles in the war against cancer. J Clin Investig, 2000;105:1169-72, [Medline]
  16. Hermiston TW, Kuhn I. Armed therapeutic viruses: strategies and challenges to arming oncolytic viruses with therapeutic genes. Cancer Gene Ther, 2002;9:1022-35, [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hermiston T. Fighting fire with fire: attacking the complexity of human tumors with armed therapeutic viruses. Curr Opin Mol Ther, 2002;4:334-42, [Medline]
  18. Wildner O, Blaese RM, Morris JC. Therapy of colon cancer with oncolytic adenovirus is enhanced by the addition of herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase. Cancer Res, 1999;59:410-3, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wildner O, Morris JC, Vahanian NN, Ford H, Jr., Ramsey WJ, Blaese RM. Adenoviral vectors capable of replication improve the efficacy of HSVtk/GCV suicide gene therapy of cancer. Gene Ther, 1999;6:57-62, [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nanda D, Vogels R, Havenga M, Avezaat CJ, Bout A, Smitt PS. Treatment of malignant gliomas with a replicating adenoviral vector expressing herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase. Cancer Res, 2001;61:8743-50, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hawkins LK, Hermiston T. Gene delivery from the E3 region of replicating human adenovirus: evaluation of the E3B region. Gene Ther, 2001;8:1142-8, [CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Bauzon M, Castro D, Karr M, Hawkins LK, Hermiston TW. Multigene expression from a replicating adenovirus using native viral promoters. Mol Ther, 2003;7:526-34, [CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Habib NA, Mitry R, Seth P, et al Adenovirus replication-competent vectors (KD1, KD3) complement the cytotoxicity and transgene expression from replication-defective vectors (Ad-GFP, Ad-Luc). Cancer Gene Ther, 2002;9:651-4, [CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Suzuki K, Fueyo J, Krasnykh V, Reynolds PN, Curiel DT, Alemany R. A conditionally replicative adenovirus with enhanced infectivity shows improved oncolytic potency. Clin Cancer Res, 2001;7:120-6, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lee CT, Park KH, Adachi Y, et al Recombinant adenoviruses expressing dominant negative insulin-like growth factor-I receptor demonstrate antitumor effects on lung cancer. Cancer Gene Ther, 2003;10:57-63, [CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Manthorpe M, Cornefert-Jensen F, Hartikka J, et al Gene therapy by intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA: studies on firefly luciferase gene expression in mice. Hum Gene Ther, 1993;4:419-31, [Medline]
  27. Hawkins LK, Lemoine NR, Kirn D. Oncolytic biotherapy: a novel therapeutic plafform. Lancet Oncol, 2002;3:17-26, [CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hawkins LK, Johnson L, Bauzon M, et al Gene delivery from the E3 region of replicating human adenovirus: evaluation of the 6.7 K/gp19 K region. Gene Ther, 2001;8:1123-31, [CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Hawkins LK, Hermiston TW. Gene delivery from the E3 region of replicating human adenovirus: evaluation of the ADP region. Gene Ther, 2001;8:1132-41, [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Wildner O, Morris JC. Subcutaneous administration of a replication-competent adenovirus expressing HSV-tk to cotton rats: dissemination, persistence, shedding, and pathogenicity. Hum Gene Ther, 2002;13:101-12, [CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H.-J. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, H.-C. Kwon, S. Bae, S.-H. Kim, J.-J. Min, C.-K. Cho, and Y.-S. Lee
Radioprotective Effect of Heat Shock Protein 25 on Submandibular Glands of Rats
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 169(5): 1601 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. Hoffmann and O. Wildner
Enhanced killing of pancreatic cancer cells by expression of fusogenic membrane glycoproteins in combination with chemotherapy.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 2013 - 2022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. D. McKee, P. Grandi, W. Mok, G. Alexandrakis, N. Insin, J. P. Zimmer, M. G. Bawendi, Y. Boucher, X. O. Breakefield, and R. K. Jain
Degradation of fibrillar collagen in a human melanoma xenograft improves the efficacy of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus vector.
Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2509 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
X. Li, S. P. Raikwar, Y.-H. Liu, S.-J. Lee, Y.-P. Zhang, S. Zhang, L. Cheng, S.-D. Lee, B. E. Juliar, T. A. Gardner, et al.
Combination therapy of androgen-independent prostate cancer using a prostate restricted replicative adenovirus and a replication-defective adenovirus encoding human endostatin-angiostatin fusion gene.
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 676 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C.-T. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Kwon, J. Lee, K. I. Kim, K.-H. Park, J. H. Kang, C.-G. Yoo, Y. W. Kim, S. K. Han, et al.
In vivo Imaging of Adenovirus Transduction and Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus and Adenovirus-p27
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 372 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, D. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online