Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. C. W.
[Cancer Research 64, 6831-6832, September 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Letters to the Editor

Lipid-Altering Drugs

Decreasing Cardiovascular Disease at the Expense of Increasing Cancer?

Mark R. Goldstein

Director of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Naples, Florida

To the Editor:

The interesting paper by Cao et al. (1) exposes a disturbing paradox in preventive medicine that has significant implications. They demonstrated that expression of a mutant receptor for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on breast cancer cell line MCF-7 inhibited the proliferation and attenuated the antiapoptotic effect of HDL on the breast cancer cells. This supports previous data suggesting that HDL is a growth stimulator for breast cancer cells (2) , particularly estrogen receptor-positive cells (3) . Raising HDL levels by lipid-altering drugs has been found to both prevent cardiovascular disease events (4, 5, 6) and decrease the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease (7, 8, 9) . Therefore, therapeutically raising HDL may be a double-edged sword by decreasing cardiovascular disease at the expense of increasing breast cancer and possibly other malignancies. Recent literature suggests this may be true (10, 11, 12, 13) .

Several trials of cholesterol lowering with drugs to prevent cardiovascular disease events have demonstrated an increase in cancer incidents in the subjects treated with lipid-altering drugs (10, 11, 12, 13) . The trials were randomized, double-blinded, and lasted an average of 5 years. The lipid-altering drugs were statins or fibrates, and the HDL cholesterol levels of the subjects randomized to the drug were raised by 5% or more for the duration of the trial period. A statistically significant excess of malignancy was seen in elderly subjects (12 , 13) and women (11) randomized to the drug groups. Alarmingly, breast cancer was diagnosed in 1 of 290 women in the placebo group and 12 of 286 women in the pravastatin group during a 5-year trial (P = 0.002; ref. 11 ). In another randomized study, involving elderly subjects with a mean age of 75 years at entry (13) , the significant decrease in coronary death in subjects randomized to pravastatin equaled the significant increase in cancer death in the same subjects, leaving total mortality unchanged.

On balance, other trials of cholesterol lowering to prevent cardiovascular disease did not demonstrate an increase in cancer incidence or mortality (4, 5, 6 , 14, 15, 16) . However, these trials were severely underrepresented with women and the elderly.

Unfortunately, there is a paucity of long-term data using lipid-altering drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women and the elderly. It is possible that women and the elderly are susceptible to cancer-promoting effects of HDL raising. Meanwhile, there is a push to put more individuals on lipid-altering drugs, particularly women and the elderly (17) . I feel there is a need for caution in the widespread use of lipid-altering drugs in women and the elderly, and they should be used when the risk of imminent cardiovascular disease is very great. More long-term data are needed and can be obtained by well-designed clinical trials. By pharmacologically raising HDL in certain segments of the population, we may be decreasing cardiovascular disease at the expense of increasing cancer.

REFERENCES

  1. Cao WM, Murao K, Imachi H, et al A mutant high-density lipoprotein receptor inhibits proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res, 2004;64:1515-21, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gospodarowicz D, Lui GM, Gonzalez R. High-density lipoproteins and the proliferation of human tumor cells maintained on extracellular matrix-coated dishes and exposed to defined medium. Cancer Res, 1982;42:3704-13, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rothender M, Kostner GM. Effects of low- and high-density lipoproteins on the proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro: differences between hormone-dependent and hormone-independent cell lines. Int J Cancer, 1989;43:875-9, [Medline]
  4. Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease. J Am Med Assoc, 1975;231:360-81, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med, 1999;341:410-8, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med, 1987;317:1237-45, [Abstract]
  7. Brown G, Albers JJ, Fisher LD, et al Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B. N Engl J Med, 1990;323:1289-98, [Abstract]
  8. Brown BG, Zhao X-Q, Chait A, et al Simvastatin and niacin, antioxidant vitamins, or the combination for the prevention of coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2001;345:1583-92, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study Investigators. Effect of fenofibrate on progression of coronary-artery disease in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, a randomized study. Lancet, 2001;357:905-10, [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Committee of Principal Investigators. A co-operative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Br Heart J, 1978;40:1069-118, [Free Full Text]
  11. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med, 1996;335:1001-9, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hunt D, Young P, Simes J, et al Benefits of pravastatin on cardiovascular events and mortality in older patients with coronary heart disease are equal to or exceed those seen in younger patients: results from the LIPID Trial. Ann Intern Med, 2001;134:931-40, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, et al Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2002;360:1623-30, [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, et al Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels. J Am Med Assoc, 1988;279:1615-22,
  15. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med, 1995;333:1301-7, [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2002;360:7-22, [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J Am Med Assoc, 2001;285:2486-97, [Free Full Text]

 

Lipid-Altering Drugs

Decreasing Cardiovascular Disease at the Expense of Increasing Cancer?

Koji Murao, Hitomi Imachi and Toshihiko Ishida

First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan

Norman C. W. Wong

Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary Health Sciences Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

In Response:

We reply to Dr. Mark R. Goldstein’s comments prompted by our recent report (1) . Dr. Goldstein points to a statistically significant excess of malignancies in several trials involving the use of statins to lower cholesterol. Several large-scale statin trials have shown that lowering cholesterol rapidly reduces the risk of major vascular events not only in middle-aged patients but also in older patients. These studies have also shown that statin therapy is well tolerated and safe, even among older patients, without evidence of any increases in cancer or other nonvascular morbidities or mortalities (2) . In the PROSPER trial, patients randomized to pravastatin in PROSPER had a slightly higher diagnosis of cancer during the trial period. Much of the slight increase was observed early in the trial, soon after the start of therapy. In addition, there was no particular prevalence of cancer type, which suggests that it may have been due to chance. This conclusion is supported by the lack of any overall excess of cancer among patients of all ages randomized to pravastatin or other statins in the meta-analysis of previous large-scale trials as noted by investigators who participated in PROSPER. A nonsignificant trend toward more cancers among patients >65 years was also noted in another statin trial, but again no particular site of the cancer predominated (3) . Moreover, among more than 1,600 people with cancers recorded during Heart Protection Study, there was no significant excess among either young or old participants or at any particular site (4) . The incidence of breast cancer was 0.2% in the pravastatin-treated group and 0.1% in those assigned to placebo. An imbalance in breast cancer had previously been noted in the CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events) study (5) . The LIPID study, compared with CARE, enrolled a larger number of women. In the LIPID study, there were 10 reported cases (1.3%) of breast cancer in pravastatin-treated women and 8 reports (1.1%) of breast cancer in placebo-treated women. In addition, 2 cases of breast cancer were reported in men; both were in the placebo group (3) .

Finally, Dr. Goldstein cautions clinicians regarding the widespread use of lipid-altering drugs in women and the elderly. Although our data show that high-density lipoprotein may contribute to the growth of breast cancer cells, these studies were done in vitro, and any attempt to extend these findings to clinical medicine is premature and unwarranted.

REFERENCES

  1. Cao WM, Murao K, Imachi H, et al A mutant high-density lipoprotein receptor inhibits proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res, 2004;64:1515-21,
  2. Collins R, Armitage J. High-risk elderly patients PROSPER from cholesterol-lowering therapy. Lancet, 2003;361:428
  3. Hunt D, Young P, Simes J, et al Benefits of pravastatin on cardiovascular events and mortality in older patients with coronary heart disease are equal to or exceed those seen in younger patients: results from the LIPID trial. Ann Intern Med, 2001;134:931-40,
  4. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2002;360:7-22,
  5. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med, 1996;335:1001-9,




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. C. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online