| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
1 Pathology Division and 2 Cancer Transcriptome Project, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan; 3 Gastroenterological Division, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan; and 4 Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we reported the cloning and characterization of dysadherin, a cancer-associated antigen that is a cell membrane glycoprotein with an FXYD motif (3 , 4) . Previous studies have indicated that dysadherin is expressed to various extents in different types of tumors, such as stomach, colon, pancreatic, and breast tumors (3, 4, 5, 6) . Only a limited number of normal cell types, including lymphocytes, endothelial cells, and basal cells of stratified squamous epithelium, show dysadherin expression. Stable transfection of a dysadherin expression vector into PLC/PRF/5 liver cancer cells resulted in reduced cellcell adhesiveness and a markedly higher number of metastatic nodules in mouse xenografts (3) .
The pattern of dysadherin expression in cancer tissue implies that this protein plays an important role in cancer cell invasion and metastasis (5) . The expression of dysadherin is significantly correlated with clinicopathological variables such as distant metastasis and poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma (6, 7, 8) . In addition, the number of dysadherin-overexpressing tumor cells is correlated with the histopathological grading of tumor nests: almost all cancer cells of infiltrative and poorly differentiated tumor nests show overexpression of dysadherin, whereas a much smaller proportion of cells in well-differentiated tumor nests do so (6) . These findings indicate that overexpression of dysadherin is strongly associated with the invasiveness of pancreatic cancers.
Several phenotypes of cultured cells observed in vitro are considered to reflect the metastatic potential of the cells in vivo. One such in vitro phenotype is cell motility. A previous study showed that a human pancreatic cancer cell line selected in vivo for metastatic ability had increased cell motility in vitro (9) . Our previous observations also indicate that, among human liver cancer cell lines, the level of cell motility in vitro is correlated with the ability to form metastases in vivo and that overexpression of dysadherin in a human liver cancer cell line causes increased metastasis (3 , 10, 11, 12) .
The aim of this study was to clarify whether dysadherin overexpression contributes to cancer metastasis through the ability of dysadherin to stimulate cell motility. We also attempted to demonstrate the universal significance of dysadherin overexpression in human cancers, regardless of the organs from which they are derived. Accordingly, in addition to our previous work using a liver cancer cell line (3) , we analyzed six human pancreatic cancer cell lines in the present study to demonstrate the relationship between dysadherin expression level and cell motility in these cell lines. Furthermore, we modulated dysadherin expression in these pancreatic cancer cell lines using small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology and cDNA transfection, and we analyzed the motility, actin organization, focal contact formation, and metastasis potential of the cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA Interference.
The basic strategy for design of siRNAs specific for dysadherin was based on previous studies (13, 14, 15)
. The siRNA sequences chosen to target dysadherin were positions 141162 (Dys141) and 498520 (Dys498) in the nucleotide sequence of dysadherin (GenBank accession number AB072911). The lamin A/C siRNA used as a control has been described previously (16)
. As the other negative control, a siRNA (Negacon) was designed with sequence 5'- GUUUCGAGGACUACUACAUUU-3' (sense) and 5'- AUGUAGUAGUCCUCGAAACUU-3' (antisense). The sequence of this negative control siRNA was subjected to BLAST search (17)
, and no highly homologous sequences were detected in the GenBank database. Although all experiments were performed using these two negative controls, there was no difference between them in the results obtained. All siRNAs were purchased from Dharmacon Research (Lafayette, CO). Twenty-four hours after inoculation of cells into 24-well flat-bottomed plates at 1 x 105 cells per well, siRNA transfection was performed using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Establishment of Capan-1 Cells Stably Expressing Dysadherin.
The expression vector for dysadherin, pcDNA3-L3HSV, has been described previously (3)
. Transfection was performed with LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions. Stable transfectants were selected by incubation with Geneticin (500 µg/mL; G418; Invitrogen), and dysadherin expression was determined by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting analyses.
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Total RNA was extracted from each cell line with TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) followed by treatment with DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI). The total RNA was reverse transcribed with Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using an oligo(dT) primer (Invitrogen). The template cDNA was amplified by the use of Hotstart Taq polymerase (Qiagen). For standardization of the amount of template cDNA, expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in each sample was quantified. The primer sets for amplification of dysadherin and GAPDH cDNA were as follows: dysadherin, 5'- TCCCACTGATGACACCACGA-3' (forward primer) and 5'-AAAACCAGATGGCTTGAGGGT-3' (reverse primer); and GAPDH, 5'-AGGAAGAGAGAGACCCTCACTGC-3' (forward primer) and 5'-ATGACAAGGTGCGGCTCC-3' (reverse primer). Polymerase chain reaction products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Immunoblot Analysis.
The cell lysates were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, and then separated proteins in the gel were electroblotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon; Millipore, Canton, MA). Anti-dysadherin monoclonal antibody (mAb) NCC-M53 and anti-Na+/K+-ATPase mAb (Affinity BioReagents, Inc., Neshanic Station, NJ) were used as described previously (6
, 18)
. The membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
Immunofluorescence and Cell Morphology.
A total of 2 x 105 cells per well were grown on glass coverslips in 12-well flat-bottomed plates for 24 hours, and siRNA transfection was performed as described above. The cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde followed by 100% ethanol at 20°C. Permeabilization was performed with 0.1% Triton X-100, and nonspecific binding was blocked with 2% normal swine serum.
Cells were incubated with anti-dysadherin mAb and anti-paxillin mAb (BD Bioscience and Clontech) followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibody. Alexa fluoro 594-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used to visualize F-actin. The samples were then mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and examined by multi-photon fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Six visual fields (x200) per coverslip were randomly selected, avoiding any overlapping, for the morphologic analysis. Cells were classified as spindle type or spread type by visual observation. We defined spindle type as a cell morphology with few processes of the cell membrane (one or two) with few actin stress fibers and spread type as a polygonal shape with many actin stress fibers. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Cell Motility Assay.
Cell motility was determined by use of the Array Scan system with HitKit HSC reagent kits (Cellomics, Pittsburgh, PA; ref. 19
). In experiments involving siRNA transfection, the transfected cells were trypsinized 48 hours after transfection. A total of 7.5 x 102 cells per well were inoculated into collagen I-coated 96-well plates covered with blue fluorescent beads. The plates were then incubated for 18 hours at 37°C under 5% CO2. As cells moved across the layer of fluorescent beads, they phagocytosed and pushed aside the beads, clearing phagokinetic tracks behind them. The track area, recognized as a negative image in a background of blue fluorescent beads, was proportional to the distance of cell movement. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin. The rhodamine signal corresponding to the submembranous cortical actin layer of a cell was defined as the margin of respective cell area. The Array Scan computer software captured nine visual fields from each well of a 96-well plate. The motility index was calculated as the total track area divided by the total cell area in all visual fields in a well. The motility index of a cell line was calculated as the average of the motility index in three independent trials (8 wells per trial).
Orthotopic Implantation.
Severe combined immunodeficient mice [SCID (6 weeks of age)] were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan) and maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment. Experimental orthotopic implantation was performed as described previously (20)
. Each mouse received injection in the pancreas with 1 x 106 cells under appropriate anesthetic procedures. Local or metastatic tumor formation was evaluated macroscopically 35 days later.
Statistical Analysis.
The differences in cell number, cell areas, and cell motility between cell lines were examined using Students t test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The expression of dysadherin was suppressed in Panc-1 cells and HeLa cells transfected with Dys141 siRNA, whereas the parent cells and cells transfected with control siRNA (lamin A/C) preserved dysadherin expression (Fig. 2A)
. This reduction of dysadherin protein seemed to be caused by the RNA interference reaction because a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiment confirmed the reduction of dysadherin mRNA (Fig. 2B)
. The other siRNA, Dys498, was less efficient than Dys141 in reducing dysadherin expression (data not shown). Thus, we used Dys141 siRNA for further study. All siRNA-transfected Panc-1 and HeLa cells showed growth curves similar to those of host cells and control cells (data not shown). Unlike the situation in Panc-1 and HeLa cells, dysadherin expression was not suppressed in BxPc-3, Mpanc-96, and Miapaca-2 cells by transfection with dysadherin siRNA (data not shown). Besides, lamin A/C expression was not suppressed in these cells by transfection with lamin A/C siRNA (data not shown). Therefore, the differences in levels of dysadherin expression among pancreatic cancer cell lines are attributable to the efficiency of siRNA transfection.
|
Change in Dysadherin Expression Affects the Motility of Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells.
The three dysadherin-overexpressing Capan-1 clones showed significantly increased cell motility compared with parental Capan-1 and mock-transfected cells (Fig. 3A and B)
. On the contrary, Panc-1 cells transfected with dysadherin siRNA showed a significant reduction of cell motility compared with parental Panc-1 cells and Panc-1 cells transfected with lamin A/C siRNA (Fig. 3C and D)
. Reduction of cell motility by dysadherin siRNA transfection was also observed in HeLa cells (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
Dysadherin Overexpression in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Promotes Metastasis in Mice.
At 35 days after transplantation, dysadherin-transfected Capan-1 cells showed multiple metastases to the liver, whereas parental Capan-1 cells and mock transfectants did not (Table 1)
. All of the transplants (dysadherin-transfected, mock-transfected, and parental Capan-1 cells) showed almost equally efficient growth at the primary injection site. This is consistent with our previous observation that the expression level of dysadherin does not strongly affect tumor cell growth (3)
.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our previous study showed that aggregation of dysadherin by anti-dysadherin antibody-coated beads triggered recruitment of actin filaments on the cell membrane in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (3) . Actin organization is one of the major mechanisms for regulation of cell migration (21, 22, 23, 24, 25) . Based on the previous and present studies, dysadherin may recruit and/or maintain actin filaments at the leading edge, where actin fiber utilization is believed to actively occur during cell movement (26) . Our data therefore suggest that the recruitment of filamentous actin toward the cell membrane is a possible mechanism of facilitation of cell motility by dysadherin overexpression. Alternatively, dysadherin might suppress or disrupt formation of focal contacts and facilitate cell movement. On the other hand, several signaling molecules, such as Rho G-proteins and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase, are known to play important roles in the regulation of cell motility (27 , 28) . It is a very interesting possibility that dysadherin overexpression might stimulate such signal-mediating molecules. Further investigation is still necessary to address the molecular mechanisms by which dysadherin overexpression affects cell motility.
A previous study (3) suggested the involvement of dysadherin in E-cadherin stability in liver cancer cells, and dysadherin expression showed significant negative correlation with E-cadherin expression in thyroid carcinoma by immunohistochemical analysis (7) . However, in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and colon cancer, immunohistochemical analyses showed that mutually exclusive expression of E-cadherin and dysadherin in cancer cells occurred in some cases but, overall, was not statistically significant (6 , 8) . In addition, in the present study, alteration of dysadherin expression in pancreatic cancer cells did not cause changes in the expression of cadherins (data not shown). The reason for the retention of E-cadherin expression in pancreatic cancers with dysadherin overexpression is unclear. It is possible that a strong signal for maintaining E-cadherin expression exists in pancreatic cancer tissue and that dysadherin could (only partially in most cases) antagonize the E-cadherinmaintaining signals.
The siRNA we designed for dysadherin was a very efficient suppressor of the expression of the target protein. Because dysadherin appears to promote the invasiveness of pancreatic cancer, dysadherin siRNA may represent an approach to the prevention or therapy of tumor metastasis in vivo. Alternatively, small molecule antagonists against dysadherin would be of interest as antimetastasis agents. The use of anti-dysadherin agents, including siRNA, in the management of metastasis in pancreatic cancer depends on whether dysadherin plays any important roles in normal tissue, and it will be important to address this point in the near future.
The present study demonstrates the biological significance of dysadherin overexpression in human pancreatic carcinomas. Our results suggest that dysadherin modulates actin organization and cell motility in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. The relationship between dysadherin expression and metastatic potential in SCID mice indicates that dysadherin functions as an inducer of metastasis of pancreatic cancer by facilitating cell motility.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Setsuo Hirohashi, Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. Phone: 81-3-3542-2511, ext. 4200; Fax: 81-3-3248-2463; E-mail:shirohas{at}ncc.go.jp
Received 4/ 9/04. Revised 7/14/04. Accepted 8/ 2/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Miller and P. B. Davis FXYD5 modulates Na+ absorption and is increased in cystic fibrosis airway epithelia Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): L654 - L664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lubarski, S. J. D. Karlish, and H. Garty Structural and functional interactions between FXYD5 and the Na+-K+-ATPase Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): F1818 - F1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-S. Nam, M.-J. Kang, A. M. Suchar, T. Shimamura, E. A. Kohn, A. M. Michalowska, V. C. Jordan, S. Hirohashi, and L. M. Wakefield Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 mediates the prometastatic effect of dysadherin in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7176 - 7184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ono, M. Shitashige, K. Honda, T. Isobe, H. Kuwabara, H. Matsuzuki, S. Hirohashi, and T. Yamada Label-free Quantitative Proteomics Using Large Peptide Data Sets Generated by Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1338 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |