Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waalkes, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Diwan, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waalkes, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Diwan, B. A.
[Cancer Research 64, 7766-7772, November 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Metallothionein-I/II Double Knockout Mice Are Hypersensitive to Lead-Induced Kidney Carcinogenesis

Role of Inclusion Body Formation

Michael P. Waalkes1, Jie Liu1, Robert A. Goyer1 and Bhalchandra A. Diwan2

1 Inorganic Carcinogenesis Section, Laboratory of Comparative Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and 2 Basic Research Program, Science Applications International Corporation, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lead is an environmental nephrotoxicant and probable human carcinogen. Elucidating factors predisposing populations to lead toxicity is an important public health issue. Recently, we found that metallothionein-I/-II double knockout (metallothionein-null) mice that are unable to produce the major forms of metallothionein do not produce lead inclusion bodies, which are thought to mitigate lead toxicity, and were sensitive to the subchronic toxic effects of lead exposure (10 weeks), showing modestly diminished renal function and nephromegaly compared with wild-type (WT) mice. It is unclear how this knockout might impact lead carcinogenesis. Thus, the effects of lead(II) acetate were tested in groups (n = 25) of male metallothionein-null and WT mice receiving drinking water with 0, 1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 parts per million lead for up to 104 weeks. Renal proliferative lesions (adenoma and cystic tubular atypical hyperplasia) were much more common and more severe in lead-exposed metallothionein-null mice than in WT mice. A metastatic renal cell carcinoma also occurred in a lead-treated metallothionein-null mouse, whereas none occurred in WT mice. Lead-induced renal proliferative lesions showed marked overexpression of cyclin D1, a common feature of human renal tumors. Renal lead-containing nuclear inclusion bodies were frequently observed in WT mice but did not form in metallothionein-null mice. Metallothionein was often found associated with the outer portion of these inclusion bodies. Thus, the metallothionein-null mice cannot form renal inclusion bodies, even after protracted lead exposure, and this increases the carcinogenic potential of lead. Poor production of metallothionein may predispose human populations to lead carcinogenicity.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lead is a naturally occurring, ubiquitous, environmental toxicant and potentially carcinogenic metal (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . Human lead exposure involves a substantial risk, particularly for the young (1, 2, 3, 4 , 7) . The toxic effects of lead can manifest in various organs, and the kidney is clearly an important target (1, 2, 3, 4 , 7) . Indeed, chronic renal lesions are considered one of the more insidious effects of the metal, in part because it may not be correlated with contemporaneous blood lead levels, which can be a poor indicator of past lead exposure (4) . Lead induces chronic nephropathy and renal dysfunction often associated with hypertension and can occur in adults with a history of childhood lead poisoning (7) . Children appear to be particularly sensitive to lead-induced chronic nephropathy and are considered a highly vulnerable risk group (8) .

Inorganic lead compounds were recently reclassified as probably carcinogenic to humans (9 , 10) , and there is suggestive evidence linking renal cancer and lead exposure in humans (5 , 6) . Lead is an unequivocal nephrocarcinogen in rodents (1 , 9 , 10) . In addition, lead commonly induces renal cystic tubular hyperplasia in rodents, considered a preneoplastic lesion leading to adenocarcinoma (11) . There are gender- and age-related differences in sensitivity to lead-induced renal tumors in rodents (1 , 12) , although the basis of this sensitivity is uncertain. Additional research is clearly warranted to help additionally define the mechanisms and potential predisposing factors in renal lead toxicity and carcinogenicity.

A remarkable characteristic of lead poisoning is the production of a protein-lead complex, which appears in renal cells of poisoned humans or animals as inclusion bodies (1 , 3 , 4 , 13) . Lead-induced inclusion bodies are often nuclear, approximately spherical and consist of an electron-dense core with a peripheral fibrillary network (3 , 4) . Inclusion bodies first form in the cytoplasm and then migrate to the nucleus (3 , 4 , 13) . Whether inclusion bodies are a permanent structure or decay with cessation of lead exposure is unknown. Similarly, the origin of the protein component of the inclusion bodies remains uncertain (3) . Lead is highly concentrated in the inclusion bodies, and as much as half of the lead in the kidney may be found here (3 , 4) . It is suspected that these complexes are protective in that they may render lead toxicologically inert, thereby blocking interactions with more sensitive cellular targets (3 , 4 , 13 , 14) . Thus, inclusion bodies may play a role in the intracellular partitioning and, possibly, toxicity of lead (4 , 13, 14, 15, 16) . The role of inclusion bodies in lead carcinogenesis is undefined.

The metal-binding protein, metallothionein, is thought to play a role in the toxicology of a variety of metals (17, 18, 19) potentially including lead. Metallothionein can be a highly inducible protein, and metals are primary inducers (17 , 19 , 20) . Lead avidly binds to metallothionein under ex vivo conditions (21) , and lead appears to bind to metallothionein in human erythrocytes (22 , 23) . Metallothionein mitigates lead toxicity in cultured cells (13 , 24) , and the binding of lead to metallothionein reduces lead-induced inhibition of the enzyme {delta}-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (25) . Recently, we studied the role of metallothionein in the subchronic toxicity of lead, with metallothionein-null (metallothionein-I/II double knockout) mice (13) , which are unable to synthesize the two major forms of metallothionein, compared with wild-type (WT) mice, which produce metallothionein at normal levels. Ten weeks of exposure to lead in the drinking water in metallothionein-null mice did not produce overt nephropathy but did induce dose-related nephromegaly and modest reductions in renal function, effects absent in WT mice (13) . This indicates that poor production of metallothionein may predispose mice to renal toxicity of lead (13) . Unexpectedly, metallothionein-null mice showed a complete lack of lead-induced inclusion body formation (13) . The sensitivity of metallothionein-null mice to lead was not based in altered biokinetics as metallothionein-null mice actually accumulated substantially less (~20%) renal lead than WT mice (13) . Although this study supports a role for metallothionein in reducing the subchronic toxicity of lead (13) , what role metallothionein might play in lead carcinogenesis is unclear, particularly in light of reduced renal accumulation of the metal in metallothionein-null mice. Thus, the present study was designed to investigate the role of metallothionein in chronic lead nephrotoxicity and carcinogenesis with metallothionein-null mice.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Treatments.
Animal care was provided in accordance with the United States Public Health Policy on the Care and Use of Animals as defined in the Guide to the Care and Use of Animals (NIH Publication 86-23). Homozygous metallothionein-I/II knockout mice (129-Mt1tm/Bri, Mt2tm/Bri 129/SvPCJ background; ref. 26 ) and corresponding WT mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The homozygous mutants were mated inter se to maintain the line. Mice were housed in a standard barrier facility, at a temperature of 68 to 72°F and with a relative humidity of 50 ± 5%, and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Diet (NIH-31 Block Modified 6% fat; Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and water were provided ad libitum. The NCI-Frederick animal program and facility, where the mice were housed, are accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. At 8 weeks of age, male metallothionein-null and WT mice were randomly divided into four groups of 25 mice each. They were then provided acidified drinking water to which lead(II) acetate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was added to give a final lead concentration of 0 (control), 1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 parts per million. Individual body weights were recorded weekly until week 26 and then at monthly or bimonthly intervals. Clinical signs were checked daily, and mice were sacrificed when significant clinical signs developed or at 104 experimental weeks.

General Pathology.
A complete necropsy was done on all of the moribund animals, animals found dead, or on mice at the study termination. The following tissues were taken: kidneys, testes, liver, lungs, adrenals, spleen, thymus, pituitary, and all of the grossly abnormal tissues. Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 µm, and stained with H&E for histologic analysis. Pathological assessments were done in a blind fashion.

Renal Pathology.
Incidence of renal lesions were determined by histologic analysis of a longitudinal midline section of both kidneys from each mouse. Grossly appearing renal lesions were sectioned separately. The multiplicity of renal proliferative lesions (cystic hyperplasia or tumor) is the average number of lesions observed in a single midline section of both kidneys. To quantify average severity of lead-induced renal proliferative lesions, all of the renal lesions were classified into one of the following groups: absent (severity score = 0); tubular cysts lined by a single layer of abnormal (atypical) hyperplastic epithelium (mild hyperplasia; severity score = 1); tubular cysts lined by two or more layers of abnormal hyperplastic epithelium (moderate hyperplasia; severity score = 2); adenoma characterized by tubular cysts with abnormal hyperplastic cells filling the entire tubular lumen (severity score = 3); or carcinoma (severity score = 4). For incidence data, mice with multiple lesions of different severity were grouped by their most advanced proliferative lesion.

Chronic nephropathy incidence and severity were also quantitated. Lead-induced chronic nephropathy was characterized by tubular degeneration, mineralization, and interstitial fibrosis. To quantify average severity of lead-induced nephropathic lesions, all of the lesions were classified into one of the following four groups: absent (severity score = 0); mild (severity score = 1); moderate (severity score = 2); or severe (severity score = 3). Mild nephropathy is considered an aging lesion in these mice.

The average number of renal nuclear inclusion bodies was assessed in control and lead-treated metallothionein-null and WT mice killed at the end of the study. In 4 mice/group, 200 nuclei from random fields of a midline section of the inner cortex were blindly scored for the presence of inclusion bodies.

Immunohistochemistry.
The presence of metallothionein in inclusion bodies of lead-treated WT mice was studied immunohistochemically. A mouse monoclonal antibody (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA) against a conserved epitope of the I and II isoforms was used. Paraffin block sections (4 µm) were incubated with biotinylated primary antibody (dilution 1:500), and then with streptavidin-peroxidase, followed by reaction with diaminobenzidine/hydrogen peroxide as chromagen substrate. For quantitative analysis, 100 inclusion bodies in random fields from metallothionein-stained sections of kidney (n = 4) were scored as showing strong, moderate-to-weak, or no staining.

Samples sections (4 µm) from lead-treated metallothionein-null mice containing representative kidney lesions (including cystic hyperplasia and adenomas) as well as a renal cell carcinoma and its pulmonary metastasis were used to evaluate the presence of cyclin D1. The sections were microwaved after deparaffinization for 10 minutes in citrate buffer. Immunohistochemical detection was done with polyclonal rabbit antihuman cyclin D antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY; dilution 1:2,000). Reactions were visualized with an avidin-biotin-peroxidase kit (Vectastain Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) with diaminobenzidine as the chromagen. The nuclear counterstain was hematoxylin.

As a negative control with both metallothionein and cyclin D1 to rule out nonspecific binding of antibodies, tissue sections were subjected to the whole procedure, but with omission of primary antibodies from each staining series.

Data Analysis.
Data are given as incidence or as mean ± SEM. A probability level of P ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Incidence is based on numbers of mice available for observation, and the loss of mice to observation (a total of 2) was because of autolysis that was considered too advanced for appropriate diagnosis. In pair-wise comparison of lesion incidence or survival, a one-sided Fisher’s exact test was used. To analyze dose-related trends in incidence or survival, a {chi}2 test for trend was used with no correction for unequal spacing of dosage levels. For multiple comparisons of mean lesion severity or multiplicity within the groups of metallothionein-null or WT mice, a two-sided Dunnett’s test was used, whereas two-sided Student’s t test was used to compare WT and metallothionein-null data at the same dosage level. A linear trend test was used to define dose-related trends in average lesion severity, proliferative lesion multiplicity or inclusion body number. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from phenotype-matched control, a dagger ({dagger}) indicates a significant difference between metallothionein-null and WT mice treated with the same level of lead, and a double dagger ({ddagger}) indicates significant, dose-related trend within a phenotype.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Survival and Body Weights.
Male metallothionein-null and WT mice were placed into groups (n = 25) and given drinking water containing lead at concentrations of 0 (control), 1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 parts per million lead. Mice were killed when moribund or after 104 weeks of treatment. Survival at the end of the study in WT mice was as follows: control, 11 of 25; 1,000 parts per million lead, 8 of 25; 2,000 parts per million lead, 14 of 25; and 4,000 parts per million lead, 5 of 25. Survival at the end of the study in metallothionein-null mice was as follows: control, 11 of 25; 1,000 parts per million lead, 11 of 25; 2,000 parts per million lead, 7 of 25; and 4,000 parts per million lead, 3 of 25. Survival was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) compared with phenotypic control by lead exposure in both the metallothionein-null and WT mice at 4,000 parts per million lead. A significant reduction in survival also occurred in metallothionein-null mice given 2,000 parts per million lead compared with WT mice given the same dose of lead. A significant dose-related reduction in survival occurred in metallothionein-null mice but not in WT mice. It is likely that kidney cancers and other renal lesions (see below) contributed to the suppression of long-term survival in metallothionein-null mice.

There were no differences in body weight between control WT and control metallothionein-null mice at any point in the study. The 1,000 parts per million lead dose had no impact on body weight relative to control in either WT or metallothionein-null mice. Significant depressions in body weight did occur in mice treated with 2,000 parts per million or 4,000 parts per million lead. In WT mice, body weight depression occurred starting after 82 weeks of lead exposure. From that point on, body weights in WT mice were suppressed 7 to 9% compared with control at 2,000 parts per million lead 12 to 14% at 4,000 parts per million lead. Metallothionein-null mice showed significant body weight suppression after 54 weeks of lead exposure. From that point on, body weight in metallothionein-null mice was suppressed 7 to 9% compared with control at 2,000 parts per million lead and 14 to 18% at 4,000 parts per million lead. Thus, lead-induced body weight suppression occurred 28 weeks earlier in metallothionein-null mice than in WT mice, although the levels of suppression were similar.

Renal Pathology.
All aspects of lead-induced renal pathology were much more pronounced in metallothionein-null mice compared with WT mice. Pathological lesions arising from chronic lead exposure in metallothionein-null mice included renal adenomas characterized by tubular cysts with atypical hyperplastic cells filling the entire tubular lumen. An aggressive renal cell carcinoma also occurred in one metallothionein-null mouse given 2,000 parts per million lead in the drinking water, which metastasized to both the lung and to the adrenal gland. This tumor is remarkable in light of the rarity of spontaneous renal carcinomas in mice. Lead-induced renal proliferative lesions included tubular cysts lined by a single layer of abnormal hyperplastic epithelium (defined as mild hyperplasias) and renal tubular cysts lined by two or more layers of abnormal hyperplastic epithelium but not filling tubular lumen (defined as moderate hyperplasia). Pictorial examples of these lead-induced renal proliferative lesions in mice have been published previously (12) .

Quantitatively, lead-induced renal tumors and hyperplasias were commonly observed in metallothionein-null mice and infrequently seen in WT mice (Table 1)Citation . In metallothionein-null mice, the incidences of renal adenoma, moderate hyperplasia, and total proliferative lesions (combined mild hyperplasia, moderate hyperplasia, adenoma, and carcinoma) showed significant increases over phenotypic control after lead exposure and strong dose-related trends across the three doses of lead (Table 1)Citation . In all, the 75 lead-exposed metallothionein-null mice had 10 renal adenoma and one renal carcinoma. In contrast, in the 73 lead-treated WT mice, only a single adenoma occurred, and the incidence of total renal proliferative lesions was only modestly increased at the highest lead dose. Although the incidence of total renal proliferative lesions showed a clear dose-response relationship in both WT and metallothionein-null animals, the maximum incidence was nearly 3-fold higher in metallothionein-null mice (60%) compared with WT mice (21%). In WT mice, nearly 80% of renal proliferative lesions were mild hyperplasia. In contrast, in lead-treated metallothionein-null animals, 83% of total proliferative lesions were diagnosed as moderate hyperplasias or tumors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Effect of oral lead exposure on the incidence of renal tumors and cystic tubular hyperplasia in MT-null and WT mice

 
Not only was the incidence of renal proliferative lesions elevated in lead-treated metallothionein-null mice, but the severity and multiplicity of these lesions was also dramatically increased compared with WT mice (Fig. 1)Citation . Average severity of renal proliferative lesions (see Materials and Methods) was significantly increased over phenotypic control at all three doses of lead in the metallothionein-null mice but never reached statistical significance in WT mice (Fig. 1Citation , left). With regard to the multiplicity of renal proliferative lesions (proliferative lesions/mouse), metallothionein-null animals showed a marked, dose-related increase to over 2 lesions/mouse after lead exposure (Fig. 1Citation , right). In fact, some lead-treated metallothionein-null mice had as many as 8 proliferative lesions. Lead exposure did not substantially increase renal proliferative lesions multiplicity at any dose of lead in WT mice.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Multiplicity (left) and severity (right) of renal proliferative lesions in WT and metallothionein-null mice exposed to lead in the drinking water. Severity was blindly scored as absent (score = 0), mild hyperplasia (1), moderate hyperplasia (2), adenoma (3), or carcinoma (4) [see Materials and Methods]. Lesion multiplicity represents the number of proliferative lesions/mouse. Bars, ±SEM (n = 24 to 25). *, significant difference from phenotypic control; {dagger}, significant difference from dosage matched WT mice. A significant trend across all of the doses occurred for severity for both WT (P = 0.013) and metallothionein-null (P < 0.0001) mice. Similarly, a significant trend across all of the doses occurred for multiplicity for both WT (P = 0.018) and metallothionein-null (P = 0.0024) mice. (MT, metallothionein; ppm, parts per million)

 
When overexpressed, cyclin D1 is considered an oncogene and is associated with various cancers, including human renal cell carcinoma (27 , 28) . To see if similar molecular changes occurred during lead carcinogenesis in metallothionein-null mice, lead-induced renal proliferative lesions were assessed immunohistochemically for cyclin D1 (Fig. 2)Citation . All stages of renal proliferative lesions stained intensely for cyclin D1, with prominent nuclear localization. Examples of staining in moderate hyperplasia and carcinoma are shown. The renal carcinoma metastasis to the lung also showed intense cyclin D1 staining (data not shown). Very weak or no cyclin D1 staining was observed in the nuclei and cells of the surrounding normal renal tubular epithelium.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1 expression in lead-induced renal proliferative lesions in metallothionein-null mice. Selected sections from lead-treated metallothionein-null mice with kidney lesions including representative cystic hyperplastic tubules, and renal cell adenomas, as well as the lead-induced renal cell carcinoma and its pulmonary metastasis were used to evaluate the localization and intensity of cyclin D1. Representative sections of moderate hyperplasia (left) and carcinoma (right) are shown (x400). All stages of renal proliferative lesions stained intensely (dark brown) for cyclin D1, with prominent nuclear localization.

 
Mild chronic nephropathy, a common aging lesion in mice, occurred to a similar extent in controls and lead-treated mice regardless of phenotype. The incidence of more serious chronic nephropathy (moderate or severe) was high in lead-treated metallothionein-null mice with a clear relationship to lead dose (Table 2)Citation . Lead-induced chronic nephropathy included tubular degeneration, necrosis, mineralization, and interstitial fibrosis. The severity of lead-induced nephropathy was also greatly increased in metallothionein-null mice (Fig. 3)Citation . In lead-treated WT mice, the incidence and severity of chronic nephropathy was not significantly different from control.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Effect of oral lead exposure on the incidence of chronic nephropathy in MT-null and WT mice

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Severity of lead-induced chronic nephropathy in WT and metallothionein-null mice exposed to lead in the drinking water. Severity was blindly scored as absent (score = 0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) [see Materials and Methods]. Bars, ±SEM (n = 24 to 25). *, significant difference from phenotypic control; {dagger}, significant difference from dosage matched WT mice. (MT, metallothionein; ppm, parts per million).

 
Renal Inclusion Bodies.
Lead-induced nuclear inclusion bodies of kidney cells are considered pathognomic of chronic lead exposure and did not occur in control WT or control metallothionein-null mice. These bodies were common in the kidneys of WT mice exposed to lead but were totally absent in kidneys of lead-treated metallothionein-null mice regardless of lead exposure. In WT mice, the average number of inclusion bodies/200 nuclei from random renal cortical fields was 0.0 ± 0.0 (mean ± SEM) in control, 11 ± 0.6 at 1,000 parts per million lead, 15 ± 0.6 at 2,000 parts per million lead, and 19 ± 0.9 at 4,000 parts per million lead. The number of inclusion bodies was significantly increased compared with WT control and dose matched metallothionein-null mice at all of the lead doses. A significant dose-related trend occurred for inclusion body formation in WT mice. The appearance of these inclusion bodies has been well described, and light and electron photomicrographs of these lesions in the kidneys of the strain of WT mice used in the present study are available (13) .

Because metallothionein-null mice were unable to form lead-containing nuclear inclusion bodies, to see if metallothionein was involved with these inclusions in lead-treated WT mice, samples of renal cortex were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for metallothionein. Many, but not all, lead-induced inclusion bodies stained intensely for metallothionein in lead-exposed WT mice, and it appeared to be associated with the surface of the structure (Fig. 4)Citation . In other inclusion bodies metallothionein staining was less intense or absent. To quantitate the presence of metallothionein in these inclusion bodies, the intensity of metallothionein staining was scored as strong, moderate-to-weak, or absent in 100 inclusions each from kidney sections of four different lead-treated WT mice. This analysis indicated 16 ± 1.2% (mean ± SEM) of the inclusion bodies showed strong staining for metallothionein, 28.7 ± 1.8% showed moderate-to-weak staining, whereas 55.3 ± 1.3 did not show significant metallothionein staining.



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Immunohistochemical analysis of metallothionein staining intensity and localization in lead-induced nuclear inclusion bodies from the kidneys of WT mice. A mouse monoclonal antibody against a conserved epitope of metallothionein-I and metallothionein-II isoforms was used. Representative section including inclusion bodies showing intense surface staining (dark brown; x400).

 
Nonrenal Pathology.
Differences in hepatocellular tumor incidence occurred with WT and metallothionein-null mice (Table 3)Citation . Control metallothionein-null mice had a higher spontaneous rate of total hepatocellular tumors (52%) compared with WT control mice (24%). Furthermore, no hepatocellular carcinomas occurred in the 98 total WT mice, whereas 6 hepatocellular carcinoma occurred in the 100 metallothionein-null mice (P = 0.015). Unexpectedly, lead suppressed hepatocellular tumor formation in both the metallothionein-null and WT mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Effect of oral lead exposure on the incidence of hepatic tumors in MT-null and WT mice

 
Lung tumors were common and not altered by lead exposure. Lung tumors in WT mice included the following: control, 8 adenoma and 7 carcinoma; 1,000 parts per million lead, 5 adenoma and 8 carcinoma; 2,000 parts per million lead, 8 adenoma and 5 carcinoma; and 4,000 parts per million lead, 6 adenoma and 8 carcinoma. Lung tumors in metallothionein-null mice included the following: control, 7 adenoma and 8 carcinoma; 1,000 parts per million lead, 8 adenoma and 4 carcinoma; 2,000 parts per million lead, 5 adenoma and 7 carcinoma; and 4,000 parts per million lead, 5 adenoma and 4 carcinoma.

Other spontaneous tumors not altered by lead exposure in metallothionein-null mice (n = 100) included the following: 6 lymphoma, 3 testicular teratoma, 3 hemangiosarcoma, 3 hemangioma, a Harderian gland adenoma, a pituitary adenoma, a lymphosarcoma, a cholangioma, and an adrenal cortical adenoma. Spontaneous tumors that were not associated with lead exposure in WT mice (n = 98) included the following: 3 testicular teratoma, 2 hemangioma, 3 hemangiosarcoma, 2 Harderian gland carcinoma, 2 Harderian gland adenoma, 2 lymphoma, a pituitary adenoma, a lung mesothelioma, a pancreatic islet cell adenocarcinoma, and a forestomach squamous cell carcinoma.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lead is considered one of the most hazardous contaminants of the human environment. Genetic susceptibility is a critical contributing factor to the widely different toxic responses in individuals exposed to similar levels of environmental toxicants potentially including lead (29 , 30) . The present work unequivocally demonstrates that the inability to express the major isoforms of the metallothionein gene created a profoundly heightened sensitivity to the nephrotoxic effects of lead in mice. This exacerbated toxic response includes nephrocarcinogenicity, as evidenced by a remarkable increase in incidence, severity and multiplicity of renal proliferative lesions, including tumors, in metallothionein-null mice. Indeed, the renal cell carcinoma observed in a lead-treated metallothionein-null mouse is remarkable because of the rarity of spontaneous renal carcinomas in mice. The observation of marked overexpression of cyclin D1 in lead-induced renal tumors and other proliferative lesions is consistent with its overexpression in human renal carcinoma (27 , 28) . The incidence and severity of chronic lead nephropathy was also greatly increased in metallothionein-null mice but did not occur to a significant extent in WT mice. In addition, the ability to synthesize metallothionein appears mechanistically linked to formation of lead-induced inclusion bodies, which, in turn, appear to be critical in the adaptive response of target renal cells to the chronic toxic effects of inorganic lead. The actual association of metallothionein with a subset of lead-induced nuclear inclusion bodies in WT mice strongly points to a significant role for this protein in their formation. Given the concern that there may be no lower threshold for the adverse effects of lead in exposed human populations (31 , 32) , any factor that predisposes individuals to lead toxicity takes on great importance. In this regard, control of metallothionein expression follows a complex, incompletely defined pattern dictated by factors like tissue, cell type, metal exposure, ontogeny, gender, and physiologic or pathological status, to name a few (17 , 20) . In humans, interindividual metallothionein expression can vary greatly even in the same cell type (33 , 34) for reasons that are not completely understood. For instance, in human blood lymphocytes from 16 individuals, the expression of metallothionein after in vitro exposure to a metallic inducer showed a 35-fold difference from the lowest to the highest responder (33) , whereas in autopsy samples of kidney from Japanese adults, there is a distinct subgroup that poorly expresses renal metallothionein (35) . The results of the present work indicate that such variability in expression might well impact renal toxicity and carcinogenicity in humans after lead exposure.

It appears that a subpopulation of lead-exposed workers can exhibit lead intoxication at relatively low blood lead levels (36) , and lead toxicity in humans is known to be dictated by individual susceptibility (22) . In this regard, a comparative study of lead speciation in erythrocytes in two lead-exposed workers provides evidence of a specific role for metallothionein in the sensitivity to lead toxicity (22) . Although both workers were heavily exposed and had similar blood lead levels, one displayed clear symptoms of lead toxicity, whereas the other was totally asymptomatic (22) . In the asymptomatic worker, ~70% of erythrocytic lead was associated with a metallothionein-like protein compared with only 20% in the lead-intoxicated individual (22) . Additional study of this lead-binding protein showed biochemical characteristics consistent with metallothionein (22 , 23) . The limited number of subjects in this series of studies (22 , 23) dictates caution when interpreting these findings, and there is no clear evidence that blood-borne metallothionein levels correlate with levels in other tissues like the kidney. However, the remarkable interindividual variability in human metallothionein expression (33 , 34) together with the clear correlation between poor expression of metallothionein and lead-induced renal toxicity and carcinogenesis in mice (present study) indicate that this metal-binding protein could be an important factor in human susceptibility to lead. Additional research on metallothionein as a component of human sensitivity to lead toxicity is clearly warranted.

Although malignant renal tumors were uncommon in the present study, there was a marked increase in the incidence of renal adenoma and cystic hyperplasia, which are considered precursor lesions to renal cell carcinoma, in lead-treated metallothionein-null mice compared to WT mice. Furthermore, both the multiplicity and severity of renal proliferative lesions were markedly increased in lead-treated metallothionein-null animals. Lead-induced renal cancers in rodents are often found against a background of preneoplastic renal epithelial cell hyperplasia (1 , 12 , 37) , as was observed in the present study, fortifying the concept that they are indeed pretumorous lesions. In this regard, poor metallothionein expression has been associated with renal cell carcinoma in several studies (38, 39, 40) . For instance, in a recent gene expression profiling survey of human renal cell carcinomas, coordinate down-regulation of all of the metallothionein forms was a common change in gene expression (38) . Others have detected a reduction in metallothionein expression in human renal carcinomas in comparison to non-neoplastic tissue from the same patients (39 , 40) . Whether metallothionein expression is a cause or consequence of renal cancer cannot be defined by these studies. However, given the remarkably heightened sensitivity to lead-induced, proliferative lesions that occurred in mice poorly expressing metallothionein throughout their life and observed reductions in metallothionein expression in human renal cell carcinomas (38, 39, 40) , it would be of interest to determine whether poor metallothionein expression played a general role in sensitivity to renal carcinogenesis. Indeed, based on diminished mutation rates in metallothionein-overexpressing cells, and because there is variability in human metallothionein expression, it has been proposed that low metallothionein expression might be a general risk factor for cancer (41) .

The inability to produce inclusion bodies on chronic exposure to lead was associated with the high frequency and severity of renal proliferative lesions and chronic nephropathy in metallothionein-null mice. In WT mice, which displayed much more limited renal pathology after chronic lead exposure, inclusion bodies were common in kidney cells. Additionally, a substantial number (16%) of lead-induced inclusion bodies stained intensely for the presence of metallothionein, and this metallothionein appeared to be associated with the outer surface of the inclusions. This might indicate some function for metallothionein in initial lead transport or could reflect aberrant essential metal trafficking induced by lead. In our initial screening of the immunohistochemical localization of metallothionein in inclusion bodies (13) , we found no clear association between metallothionein and the inclusions. This is perhaps because of the limited number of sections investigated in our initial study (13) or reflects a difference in the length of lead exposure, which in the present study was up to 2 years but in our prior work was only for 10 weeks (13) . In any event, it is clear from the present work and our earlier subchronic study (13) that metallothionein plays a key role in production of lead-induced inclusion body formation, although its exact role remains to be established. It has been proposed that inclusion bodies are a cellular adaptation mechanism whereby lead is sequestered in a relatively inert and, therefore, nontoxic form (3 , 4 , 13 , 14) . The results of the present study provide unequivocal evidence that the inability to form inclusion bodies greatly exaggerates the chronic toxicity of lead to the kidney. We are now directing research to determine whether metallothionein facilitates the formation or is actually part of the lead-induced inclusion bodies.

Interestingly, a recent test of acute lethality of various metals in metallothionein-null and WT mice with an escalating dosage scheme found that metallothionein provided no protection against the acute lethal effects of injected lead (19) . Thus, it appears that although metallothionein reduces the subchronic and chronic toxic effects of lead, it does not prevent events associated with high doses and early lethality (19) . In this regard, in vitro studies have shown inclusion bodies take at least 24 hours after lead exposure to be formed in kidney cells (42) . These data indicate that inclusion bodies are an adaptive response that is not normally operating and only becomes functional some time after the initial exposure to lead. As such, it would appear that different factors dictate sensitivity to the acute versus the chronic toxic effects of lead.

Control metallothionein-null mice had a higher incidence of spontaneous hepatocellular tumors than control WT mice. This included several cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in metallothionein-null mice, whereas only benign tumors occurred in WT mice. The increase in liver cancers in control metallothionein-null mice is interesting in light of the report that metal-induced overexpression of hepatic metallothionein greatly reduces spontaneous liver tumors in C3H mice (43) . Furthermore, metallothionein-transgenic mice that constitutively overexpress metallothionein-I at levels up to 20x WT control, also show a marked decrease in spontaneous tumor formation (44) . Because increased cellular metallothionein is correlated with reduced spontaneous mutations, it is thought that low metallothionein expression could be a general risk factor for tumor development (41) . The present findings provide additional evidence that the presence of metallothionein may reduce spontaneous carcinogenesis. In addition, lead exposure suppressed hepatocellular tumor formation in both metallothionein-null and WT mice. Other metals, like cadmium (45) , can reduce liver tumor formation in rodents, although the mechanism for this suppression is not known.

In summary, metallothionein-null mice are unable to form renal inclusion bodies in response to chronic lead exposure and are remarkably susceptible to development of lead-induced neoplastic, preneoplastic, and chronic toxic kidney lesions. Although the exact role of lead-induced inclusion body formation is not known, our results strongly suggest that the inability to produce these lead-containing bodies renders mice hypersensitive to the carcinogenic and chronic toxic effects of this metal. Efforts to define the role of metallothionein in the sensitivity of human populations to lead intoxication should be a research priority.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors wish to thank Dan Logsdon for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Jerrold M. Ward for assistance with pathological analysis and photomicrographics.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: The National Cancer Institute and National Cancer Institute Contract NO1-CO-12400.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Michael P. Waalkes, Inorganic Carcinogenesis Section, National Cancer Institute at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Phone: (919) 541-2328; Fax: (919) 541-3970; E-mail: waalkes{at}niehs.nih.gov

Received 6/23/04. Revised 8/30/04. Accepted 9/ 2/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. International Programme on Chemical Safety, Environmental Health Criteria 165, Inorganic Lead. Geneva: WHO; 1995. p. 300.
  2. Silbergeld EK Implications of new data on lead toxicity for managing and preventing exposure. Environ Health Perspect 1990;89:49-54.[Medline]
  3. Goyer RA Toxic effects of metals Klaassen CD eds. . Casarett & Doull’s toxicology the basic science of poisons 5th ed. 1996p. 691-736. McGraw-Hill New York
  4. Nolan CV, Shaikh ZA Lead nephropathy and associated disorders: Biochemical mechanisms. Toxicology 1992;73:127-46.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Fu H, Boffetta P Cancer and occupational exposure to inorganic lead compounds: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 1995;52:73-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Steenland K, Boffetta P Lead and cancer in humans: Where are we now. Am J Indust Med 2000;38:295-99.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Loghman-Adham M Renal effects of environmental and occupational lead exposure: a review. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105:928-38.[Medline]
  8. Fel LM, Wunsch M, Baranowski J, et al Adverse effects of chronic low level lead exposure on kidney function–a risk group study in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:2248-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, some metals and metals compounds, lead and lead compounds. Lyon, France: IARC; 1980;23:325–415.
  10. World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, inorganic and organic lead compounds. Lyon, France: IARC; 2004;87: In press.
  11. Bernstein J, Evan AP, Gardner KD, Jr. Epithelial hyperplasia in human polycystic kidney disease: its role in the pathogenesis and risk of neoplasia. Am J Pathol 1987;129:97-101.
  12. Waalkes MP, Diwan BA, Ward JM, Devor DE, Goyer RA Renal tubular tumors and atypical hyperplasias in B6C3F mice exposed to lead acetate during gestation and lactation occur with minimal chronic nephropathy. Cancer Res 1995;55:5265-71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Qu W, Diwan BA, Liu J, et al The metallothionein-null phenotype is associated with heightened sensitivity to lead toxicity and an inability to form inclusion bodies. Am J Pathol 2002;160:1047-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fowler BA Roles of lead-binding proteins in mediating lead bioavailability. Environ Health Perspect 1998;106(Suppl 6):1585-87.
  15. Goyer RA, Wilson MH Lead-induced inclusion bodies. Lab Investig 1975;32:149-56.[Medline]
  16. Cherian MG, Nordberg M Cellular adaptation in metal toxicology and metallothionein. Toxicology 1983;28:1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Waalkes MP, Perez-Olle R Role of metallothionein in metabolism, transport and toxicity of metals Koropatnick DJ Zalups R eds. . Molecular biology and toxicology of metals 2000p. 414-55. Taylor & Francis London
  18. Klaassen CD, Liu J, Choudhuri S Metallothionein: an intracellular protein to protect against cadmium toxicity. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1999;39:267-94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Park JD, Liu Y, Klaassen CD Protective effect of metallothionein against the toxicity of cadmium and other metals. Toxicology 2001;163:93-100.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Haq F, Mahoney M, Koropatnick J Signaling events for metallothionein induction. Mutat Res 2003;533:211-26.[Medline]
  21. Waalkes MP, Harvey MJ, Klaassen CD Relative in vitro affinity of hepatic metallothionein for metals. Toxicol Lett (Amst) 1984;20:33-9.
  22. Church HJ, Day JP, Braithwaite RA, Brown SS The speciation of lead in erythrocytes in relation to lead toxicity: case studies of two lead-exposed workers. Neurotoxicology 1993;14:359-64.[Medline]
  23. Church HJ, Day JP, Braithwaite RA, Brown SS Binding of lead to a metallothionein-like protein in human erythrocytes. J Inorg Biochem 1993;49:55-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Liu J, Kershaw WC, Klaassen CD The protective effect of metallothionein on the toxicity of various metals in rat primary hepatocyte culture. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1991;107:27-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Goering PL, Fowler BA Kidney zinc-thionein regulation of delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase inhibition by lead. Arch Biochem Biophys 1987;253:48-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Masters BA, Kelly EJ, Quaife CJ, Brinster RL, Plamiter RD Targeted disruption of metallothionein I and II genes increases sensitivity to cadmium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:584-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hedberg Y, Davoodi E, Roos G, Ljungberg B, Landberg G Cyclin-D1 expression in human renal-cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1999;84:268-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Lin BT, Brynes RK, Gelb AB, et al Cyclin D1 expression in renal carcinomas and oncocytomas: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol 1998;11:1075-81.[Medline]
  29. Weaver VM, Schwartz BS, Ahn KD, et al Associations of renal function with polymorphisms in the {delta}-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, vitamin D receptor, and nitric oxide synthase genes in Korean lead workers. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:1613-19.[Medline]
  30. Smith CM, Wang X, Hu H, Kelsey KT A polymorphism in the delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase gene may modify the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lead. Environ Health Perspect 1995;103:248-53.[Medline]
  31. Smith DR, Kahng MW, Quintanilla-Vega B, Fowler BA High-affinity renal lead-binding proteins in environmentally-exposed humans. Chem-Biol Interact 1998;115:39-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Needleman HL, Riess MJ, Tobin GE, Biesecker GE, Greenhouse JB Bone lead levels and delinquent behavior. J Am Med Assoc 1996;275:363-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wu MT, Demple B, Bennett RA, Christiani DC, Fan R, Hu H Individual variability in the zinc inducibility of metallothionein-IIA mRNA in human lymphocytes. J Toxicol Environ Health 2000;61:553-67.[CrossRef]
  34. Ablett E, Whiteman DC, Boyle GM, Green AC, Parsons PG Induction of metallothionein in human skin by routine exposure to sunlight: evidence for a systematic response and enhanced induction at certain body sites. J Investig Dermatol 2003;120:318-24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Yoshida M, Ohta H, Yamauchi Y, et al Age-dependent changes in metallothionein levels in liver and kidney of the Japanese. Biol Trace Elem Res 1998;63:167-75.[Medline]
  36. Raghavan SR, Culver BD, Gonick HC Erythrocyte lead-binding protein after occupational exposure: I. Relationship to lead toxicity. Environ Res 1980;22:264-70.[Medline]
  37. Goyer RA Lead toxicity: current concerns. Environ Health Perspect 1993;100:177-87.[Medline]
  38. Takahashi M, Rhodes DR, Furge KA, et al Gene expression profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: gene identification and prognostic classification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:9754-59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Hellemans G, Soumilions A, Proost P, et al Metallothioneins in human kidneys and associated tumors. Nephron 1999;83:331-40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Ishii K, Usui S, Yamamoto H, et al Decreases of metallothionein and aminopeptidase N in renal cancer tissue. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2001;129:253-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Concharova EI, Rossman TG A role for metallothionein and zinc in spontaneous mutagenesis. Cancer Res 1994;54:5318-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. McLachlin JR, Goyer RA, Cherian MG Formation of lead-induced inclusion bodies in primary rat kidney epithelial cell cultures: effect of actinomycin D and cycloheximide. Toxicol Appl Pharmcol 1980;56:418-31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Nishiyama S, Itoh N, Onosaka S, et al Dietary cadmium inhibits spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in C3H/HeN mice and hepatitis in A/J mice, but not in C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmcol 2003;186:1-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Waalkes MP, Liu J, Kasprzak KS, Diwan BA Minimal influence of metallothionein over-expression on nickel carcinogenesis in mice. Toxicol Lett 2004;153:357-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Waalkes MP, Diwan BA, Rehm S, et al Down regulation of metallothionein expression in human and murine hepatocellular tumors: association with the tumor-necrotizing and antineoplastic effects of cadmium in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996;277:1026-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
P. Zuo, W. Qu, R. N. Cooper, R. A. Goyer, B. A. Diwan, and M. P. Waalkes
Potential Role of {alpha}-Synuclein and Metallothionein in Lead-Induced Inclusion Body Formation
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2009; 111(1): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
N. Healey
Lead toxicity, vulnerable subpopulations and emergency preparedness
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2009; 134(3-4): 143 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waalkes, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Diwan, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waalkes, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Diwan, B. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online