Cancer Research Targets Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aqeilan, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Croce, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aqeilan, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Croce, C. M.
[Cancer Research 64, 8256-8261, November 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Regular Articles

Physical and Functional Interactions between the Wwox Tumor Suppressor Protein and the AP-2{gamma} Transcription Factor

Rami I. Aqeilan1, Alexey Palamarchuk1, Ronald J. Weigel2, Juan J. Herrero3, Yuri Pekarsky1 and Carlo M. Croce1

1 Kimmel Cancer Center and 2 Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and 3 AxCell Biosciences Corporation, Newtown, Pennsylvania


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The WWOX gene encodes a tumor suppressor WW domain-containing protein, Wwox. Alterations of WWOX have been demonstrated in multiple types of cancer, and introduction of Wwox into Wwox-negative tumor cells has resulted in tumor suppression and apoptosis. The Wwox protein contains two WW domains that typically bind proline-rich motifs and mediate protein–protein interactions. Recently, we have described functional cross-talk between the Wwox protein and the p53 homologue, p73. To further explore the biological function of Wwox, we investigated other interacting candidates. In this report, we demonstrate a physical and functional association between AP-2{gamma} transcription factor and the Wwox protein. AP-2{gamma} at 20q13.2 encodes a transcription factor and is frequently amplified in breast carcinoma. We show that Wwox binds to the PPPY motif of AP-2{gamma} via its first WW domain. Alterations of tyrosine 33 in the first WW domain of Wwox or the proline-rich motif in AP-2{gamma} dramatically reduce this interaction. In addition, our results demonstrate that Wwox expression triggers redistribution of nuclear AP-2{gamma} to the cytoplasm, hence suppressing its transactivating function. Our results suggest that Wwox tumor suppressor protein inhibits AP-2{gamma} oncogenic activity by sequestering it in the cytoplasm.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) is a tumor suppressor gene that spans one of the most active fragile sites in the human genome, FRA16D (1 , 2) . WWOX, also known as FORII, is located at 16q23.3–24.1, a region with a high incidence of loss of heterozygosity and homozygous deletions (3 , 4) . WWOX expression is altered in several cancer types, including breast, prostate, ovarian, esophageal, lung, pancreatic, and gastric carcinomas (1 , 2 , 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) . Similar to FHIT, which spans the human FRA3B fragile site (10) , several aberrant transcripts of WWOX have been reported in tumor cell lines of different origins, and point mutations are rare (2 , 5 , 11) .

The frequent deletion of Wwox in multiple tumors suggests that Wwox may act as a tumor suppressor gene. Indeed, Bednarek et al. (12) showed that Wwox suppresses tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Stable expression of Wwox in MD-MB-435 and T47D breast carcinoma cells resulted in a dramatic decrease in the number of colonies in soft agar colony assay. Injection of these cells in nude mice also showed significant tumor suppression effect by the exogenous Wwox expression (12) . In addition, we recently showed similar tumor suppressor effect of Wwox in AsPc1 and Panc1 pancreatic carcinoma cells (8) .

The WWOX gene encodes a Mr 46,000 protein that possesses two NH2-terminal WW domains (containing conserved tryptophan residues) and a COOH-terminal short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase domain (1) . WW domains are present in numerous unrelated proteins, such as Yes-associated protein, Nedd4, dystrophin, Rsp5, Pub1, FE65, Pin1, and FBPs. Like the SH3 domain, the WW domain is characterized by interaction with proline-containing ligands and mediates protein–protein interactions (13 , 14) . The short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase domain is usually involved in the metabolism of steroid hormones such as androgens and estrogens (15 , 16) . Indeed, Wwox expression is up-regulated in endocrine organs such as testis and breast, indicating an important role of Wwox in these tissues (1) .

Recently, we performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-like assay to determine putative interacting proteins with Wwox (17) . Peptides containing the WW domain-binding motif PPxY were assayed against WW domains of Wwox expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. Several peptides bound with high affinity to WW domains of Wwox.

We showed that Wwox specifically binds the PPPPY motif of p73, both in vitro and in vivo, via its first WW domain (17) . Our data revealed a functional relationship between p73 and Wwox and its role in apoptosis. Another report showed that the murine Wwox ortholog, Wox1, physically interacts with p53 and Jnk1 upon stress conditions (18 , 19) . Taken together, these observations demonstrate that Wwox is involved in stress and apoptotic responses contributing to the tumor suppressor activity of Wwox.

We aimed to investigate other putative interactions of Wwox to further explore the molecular mechanism of its tumor suppressive activity. Our affinity assay results suggested that the first WW domain of Wwox would bind with high affinity to a peptide derived from the activating protein-2 {gamma} and {alpha} (AP-2{gamma} and {alpha}). The AP-2 gene family consists of five members, AP-2{alpha}, AP-2ß, AP-2{gamma}, AP-2{delta}, and the recently discovered AP-2{epsilon} (20 , 21) and plays important roles in regulating gene expression. The AP-2 transcription factors share a highly conserved COOH terminus that is involved in dimerization and DNA binding. The members of the AP-2 family transcription factors play important roles in orchestrating embryonic development by affecting cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival in multiple organs and tissues (20) . Furthermore, AP-2 transcription factors have been implicated in breast carcinogenesis. This notion is supported by the fact that the genomic locus 20q13.2 containing AP-2{gamma} is frequently amplified in breast cancer cell lines and breast carcinomas (22) . In addition, AP-2{gamma} has been linked to the regulation of the ERBB2 (23 , 24) and ER{alpha} (25 , 26) genes involved in tumor progression of breast cancer. Altogether, these data suggest that AP-2{gamma} possess an oncogenic activity in breast cancer. Here, we show negative regulation of AP-2{gamma} by the Wwox tumor suppressor protein through direct protein–protein interaction.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture.
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells, human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells, human MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells, and mouse NIH-3T3 fibroblasts cells were grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Gentamicin. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Plasmid Constructs and Transient Transfections.
The mammalian expression plasmids encoding MYC epitope-tagged WWOX and pCMV-MYC-WWOXY33R were described previously (17) . Full-length cDNA of AP-2{alpha} and AP-2{gamma} were cloned into a hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged pCMV vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) using standard protocols. A diagram of both Wwox and AP-2{gamma} indicating the functional domains is shown in Fig. 1ACitation . HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A was obtained by site-directed PCR mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Both terminal tyrosines of the PPPY motifs, Y59 and Y64, in AP-2{gamma} were mutated to alanine (A), producing the expression vector HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A. The following primers were used: forward, 5'-CGCCACCCGCCTTTCCCCCTCCCGCCCAGCAGCTGGCCTAC-3'; reverse, 5'-GCTGCTGGGCGGGAGGGGGAAAGGCGGGTGGCGGCTGATATTCGG-3'. Overexpression of proteins was achieved by transient transfections using Fugene 6 transfection reagent, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Wwox physically interacts with AP-2{gamma} in vivo. A, a schematic diagram showing the functional domains in Wwox and AP-2{gamma}. B. 293 cells were transiently transfected with the expression plasmids encoding Myc-Wwox with HA-AP-2{alpha} or HA-AP-2{gamma} (as indicated at the top). Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Myc, anti-IgG, or anti-HA antibodies 36 hours after transfection. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-HA (top panel) or anti-myc (lower panel) antibodies. C. 293 cells were transiently transfected with the expression plasmids encoding HA-AP-2{gamma}, and Myc-Wwox or Myc-WwoxY33R and treated as in B. D. 293 cells were transiently cotransfected with the expression plasmids encoding Myc-Wwox and HA-AP-2{gamma} or HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A. Immunoprecipitation and immunblotting were as in B. E. 293 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors and lysates were treated as B.

 
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis.
Cells were lysed using NP40 lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP40, and protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitations were carried out overnight as described previously (17) . Antibodies used were mouse monoclonal anti-HA (Covance, Princeton, NJ) and mouse monoclonal anti-Myc (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA). Western blotting was performed under standard conditions. Antibodies used for immunoblot were anti-HA-horseradish peroxidase (Roche Applied Science), anti-Myc-horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and mouse monoclonal anti-AP2{gamma} (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Glutathione S-Transferase Pull-down Assay.
Using standard protocols, we used pGEX6P-2 plasmid (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) to construct and express GST fusions of the first 50 amino acids of Wwox that include the first WW domain (WW-I) as described previously (17) . A diagram of wild-type WW-I and mutated WW-I (WW-I-Y33F) is shown in Fig. 2ACitation . Pull-down assays were performed using 5 µg of immobilized purified GST fusion proteins or wild-type GST that was incubated with 500 µg of total cellular proteins, prepared from 293 cells transiently transfected with the indicated plasmids. The lysates were precleared with glutathione-agarose beads and then incubated for overnight at 4°C with the indicated GST fusion proteins. After four washes with immunoprecipitation washing buffer (see above), complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with mouse monoclonal anti-HA (Covance) and anti-GST (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Ponceau S solution (Sigma) was used to stain nitrocellulose membranes for protein levels of the different GST fusion proteins.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Direct interaction between Wwox and AP2{gamma} in vitro. A, a diagram showing GST fusion proteins, GST-WW-I and GST-WW-IY33F, of the first 50 amino acids of Wwox. B. 293 cells were transfected with HA-AP-2{gamma} or HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59,64A, and lysates were mixed with the indicated GST fusions or GST alone. Complexes were captured with glutathione-Sepharose and bound proteins were detected by anti-HA immuonoblot. The bottom panel shows a staining of the membrane with Ponceau S solution for GST fusion protein levels.

 
Luciferase Assays.
Using standard cloning protocols, we cloned a luciferase reporter downstream of TFAP2-binding elements. Three repeats of the AP-2–binding site were cloned upstream of the basic promoter of thymidine kinase (TK) in the pGL3 (Promega), (AP-2)3-TK-LUC (designated as AP2-LUC). A diagram of AP2-LUC is shown in Fig. 4ACitation . Transient transfections of HeLa cells or 293 cells with AP2-LUC, together with the indicated expression vector combination were carried out with the Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Applied Science). Cells were collected 24 hours later, rinsed with PBS, resuspended in reporter cell lysis buffer (Promega), and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. Insoluble material was spun down, and luciferase activity was quantified using a luciferase assay kit (Promega), with the aid of a luminometer. Results are shown as fold induction of the luciferase activity compared with control cells transfected with empty vector alone.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. Wwox overexpression suppresses AP-2{gamma} transcriptional activity. A, a diagram shows the luciferase reporter construct (AP2-LUC) used, under the regulation of thymidine kinase (TK) promoter and three repeats of the AP-2–responsive element. B. 293 cells were transiently cotransfected with AP2-LUC construct (0.25 µg) and the indicated amount of expression vectors. Empty vector was cotransfected to normalize plasmid concentration where required. Twenty-four hours post-transfection, cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was determined. Results are shown as fold induction of the luciferase activity compared with control cells transfected with empty vector alone. Results shown are the average of five experiments. C. HeLa cells were transiently cotransfected with AP2-LUC construct (0.25 µg), and the indicated amounts of expressing vectors. Cells were then treated as B. A representative experiment is shown.

 
Immunofluorescence.
Cells were seeded on fibronectin-covered cell culture slides (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), fixed for 10 minutes in 3.7% PBS-buffered formaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 minutes. Cells were then incubated for 1 hour in 100% goat serum to block nonspecific bindings (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and incubated with a primary antibody for 1 hour in 10% goat serum in PBS and with secondary antibody under the same conditions. Antibodies used were anti-HA, anti-Myc rabbit polyclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-gst-wwox serum (27) , antimouse Fluoro-conjugated antibody and antirabbit Texas red–conjugated antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Cells were examined by confocal microscopy (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under x63 magnification.


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Physical Interaction between Wwox and AP-2{gamma} In vivo and In vitro.
In an attempt to identify candidate Wwox-interacting proteins, we studied the ability of various proline-rich peptides to bind the WW domains of Wwox. Peptides containing the WW domain-binding motif PPxY were assayed against the two WW domains of Wwox expressed as GST fusion proteins in an ELISA-like assay (28) . A peptide derived from AP-2{gamma} (56PPPYFPPPY64) and, to a lesser extent, AP-2{alpha} (59PPPY62) bound with high affinity to the first WW domain of Wwox (results not shown). Based on this in vitro evidence, we proceeded to investigate the ability of Wwox to bind AP-2{alpha} and AP-2{gamma} in vivo. We transiently cotransfected 293 cells with vectors expressing either HA-AP-2{alpha} or HA-AP-2{gamma} and Myc-Wwox. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies followed by immunoblotting with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody to HA or Myc. The results demonstrate that Wwox interacts with AP-2{alpha} and with AP-2{gamma} as determined by immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc and immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody (Fig. 1BCitation , Lanes 1 and 4, top panel). As a control, there were no detectable complexes in anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunoprecipitates (Fig. 1BCitation , Lanes 2 and 5). The same complexes were detected in reverse when immunoprecipitation with anti-HA and immunoblotting with anti-Myc antibody (Fig. 1BCitation , Lanes 3 and 6, bottom panel). In accordance with the affinity assay prediction, Wwox bound AP-2{gamma} more strongly than AP-2{alpha} (Fig. 1B)Citation , therefore we proceeded to further investigate Wwox-AP-2{gamma} interaction.

To map the region responsible for Wwox-AP-2 interaction, we used site-directed PCR mutagenesis to generate point mutations and determined the ability of these mutants to interact. We had a strong indication from the in vitro affinity assay that the first WW domain of Wwox interacts with the proline-rich motif PPPY in both AP-2{alpha} and AP-2{gamma}. We also showed recently that a point mutation in tyrosine 33 (Y33), Y33R, in the first WW domain of Wwox is sufficient to abolish interaction of Wwox and p73 (17) . Therefore, we examined whether this mutant form of Wwox (Myc-WwoxY33R) can immunoprecipitate AP-2{gamma}. To this end, we cotransfected 293 cells with expression vectors encoding HA-AP-2{gamma} and MYC-WWOXY33R, and extracts were precipitated with anti-Myc and blotted with anti-HA antibodies. We found that Y33R point mutation in the first WW domain of Wwox dramatically reduces Wwox association with AP-2{gamma} (Fig. 1CCitation , Lane 1 versus 4, top panel). The same interaction was demonstrated when extracts were precipitated with anti-HA and blotted with anti-Myc antibodies (Fig. 1CCitation , Lane 3 versus 6, bottom panel).

In addition, we generated point mutations in the PPPY motif of AP-2{gamma} and determined the ability of these mutants to bind Wwox by coimmunoprecipitation. In the AP-2{gamma} proline-containing motif, terminal tyrosines Y59 and Y64 were mutated to alanine (A), producing the expression vector HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59,64A. To determine whether Myc-Wwox immunoprecipitate HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59,64A, we cotransfected 293 cells with both expression vectors and immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody or anti-HA. Fig. 1DCitation shows that point mutations in the proline-containing motif of AP-2{gamma} significantly decreases Wwox–AP-2{gamma} association (Fig. 1DCitation , Lane 1 versus 4, top panel). Much milder, but consistent, difference was observed in reverse coimmuoprecipitation experiment (Fig. 1DCitation , Lane 3 versus 6, bottom panel). The specificity of these interactions was further confirmed when the same result was obtained when cotransfecting 293 cells with Myc-WwoxY33R and HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A (Fig. 1ECitation , Lane 4, top panel, and Lane 6, bottom panel).

To demonstrate direct binding between Wwox and AP-2{gamma}, we carried out in vitro GST pull-down experiments. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transfected with expression vectors HA-AP-2{gamma} or mutated HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59,64A. Protein lysates were incubated with GST fusion proteins that contain the first 50 amino acids of Wwox sequence coding for the first WW domain (WW-I), either wild-type or harboring a point mutation in Y33 (WW-I-Y33F; Fig. 2ACitation ). The pulled down proteins were immuonoblotted with anti-HA antibody. A specific complex was pulled down when wild-type WW-I-GST fusion, but not GST alone or WW-I-Y33F, was incubated with AP-2{gamma}–expressing lysate (Fig. 2BCitation , Lanes 1 and 3 versus 2). In contrast, GST-WW-I or GST-WW-I-Y33F fusions were unable to pull down the mutated AP-2{gamma} (Fig. 2BCitation , Lanes 5 and 6), confirming that the PPPY motif and first WW domain are responsible for Wwox-AP-2{gamma} interaction.

Wwox-AP-2{gamma} Interaction Affects AP-2{gamma} Intracellular Localization.
We also examined the effect of Wwox-AP-2{gamma} interaction on the subcellular localization of Wwox and AP-2{gamma}. To address this, we studied the localization of both proteins with the aid of confocal microscopy. HA-AP-2{gamma} or HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A alone or transfected with MYC-WWOX was transiently expressed in NIH-3T3 cells. Localization of the HA- or Myc-tagged proteins was then determined by immunofluorescent staining using the appropriate antibodies, as described in Materials and Methods. Although the majority of AP-2{gamma} localizes to the nucleus, some cells also showed mild cytoplasmic staining of transfected NIH-3T3 cells (Fig. 3Aa)Citation . In contrast, exogenous Wwox is mainly detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3Ab)Citation . In cells cotransfected with Myc-Wwox and HA-AP-2{gamma}, 60 to 70% of cells showed cytoplasmic staining of AP-2{gamma} where it colocalizes with Wwox (Fig. 3Ac)Citation . Similar results were obtained with MCF-7 cells, which express high levels of endogenous Wwox protein (Fig. 3Bd)Citation , upon transfection with HA-AP-2{gamma} (Fig. 3Be)Citation . By contrast, MCF-7 cells transfected with HA-AP-2{gamma}Y59, 64A show only nuclear localization of AP2{gamma} (Fig. 3Bf)Citation . Interestingly, coexpression of WwoxY33R and AP-2{gamma} showed also a cytoplasmic AP-2{gamma} localization similar to wild-type Wwox (data not shown). These results are consistent with immunoprecipitation results in which a mutation in Y33 did not completely inhibit interaction with AP-2{gamma} (Fig. 1C)Citation . Cumulatively, these results indicate that Wwox can modulate the cellular localization of AP-2{gamma} and cause its redistribution to the cytoplasmic compartment.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Subcellular localization of Wwox and AP-2{gamma}. A. NIH-3T3 cells were cotransfected with the plasmids indicated in each panel. After fixation and permeabilization, the cells were coimmunostained with anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies, followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antimouse IgG (green; AP-2{gamma}) and Texas red–conjugated antirabbit IgG (red; Wwox), and cells were examined by confocal microscopy. Colocalization of Wwox and AP-2{gamma} is shown in yellow as a result of merging the two colors. B. MCF-7 cells were transfected as indicated. Cells were prepared as A. Antibodies used were polyclonal anti-wwox (red) and monoclonal anti-HA (green).

 
Wwox Suppresses the Transcriptional Activity of AP-2{gamma}.
Because Wwox can alter the nuclear localization of AP-2{gamma}, we examined whether this modulation affects the transcriptional activity of AP-2{gamma}. We constructed a luciferase reporter cloned downstream of TFAP2-binding elements (AP2-LUC; Fig. 4ACitation ). Cotransfection of 293 cells with AP2-LUC and HA-AP-2{gamma} alone caused activation of luciferase reporter (Fig. 4BCitation , bar 3). By contrast, cotransfection of AP2-LUC and the MYC-WWOX constructs had no detectable effect on luciferase activity. (Fig. 4BCitation , bar 2). Expression of Wwox significantly suppressed the transactivation function of AP2{gamma} (Fig. 4BCitation , bar 4). However, HA-AP-2{gamma}Y54, 65A (mAP-2{gamma}) expression has less luciferase activation by itself, and its coexpression with Wwox has also lesser effect on AP2{gamma} transactivation activity when compared with the effect on wild-type AP-2 (Fig. 4BCitation ; bars 5 and 6 versus 3 and 4). Similar results were observed in HeLa cells, and a dose-dependent effect of Wwox suppression on AP-2{gamma} transcriptional activity was also observed (Fig. 4C)Citation . These results indicate that Wwox can suppress AP2{gamma} transactivation activity in a dose-dependent manner.


   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have shown that Wwox interacts with AP2{gamma} in vitro and in vivo, and this association involves the first WW domain of Wwox and an AP-2{gamma} region containing the PPPY motif (Fig. 1)Citation . The interaction of WW domains with proline-rich ligands is mainly dependent on the structure of these motifs (13 , 14) . We have recently shown that Wwox also interacts with a p73 region containing a PPPPY motif (17) . The first WW domain of Wwox belongs to the first class (class I) of the current classification of the diverse WW domains and binds to ligands containing a PPxY motif (13 , 14) . Recently, Ludes-Meyers et al. (29) confirmed our observations and showed that Wwox binds to the same proline-rich ligand. Interestingly, a point mutation in the terminal tyrosine of the PPPY motif interferes with Wwox-AP-2{gamma} interaction, emphasizing the importance of this motif. Similar to Wwox-p73 interaction, a point mutation in Y33 of Wwox significantly disrupts Wwox-AP-2{gamma} association. On the other hand, WwoxY33R still shows some colocalization with AP-2{gamma} in cytoplasm. Therefore, we cannot exclude that the second WW domain or another domain of Wwox may also contribute to this interaction. Possible involvement of other Wwox domains is also consistent with the fact that full-length Wwox shows visible coimmunoprecitation with mutated AP-2{gamma}, whereas GST pull-down assay using only the first WW domain of Wwox does not show any interaction. Y33 is a phosphorylation target of Src kinase (17) . The function, activity, stability, or subcellular localization of many proteins can be altered after post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation. We showed that Y33 phosphorylation enhances Wwox-p73 association (17) , and this phosphorylation is also essential for pro-apoptotic activity of Wwox (19) . Therefore, Y33 seems to harbor an important function in regulating Wwox activity.

We have also shown, using confocal microscopy, that Wwox causes the redistribution of AP-2{gamma} to the cytosol. Interestingly, Pellikainen et al. (30) , showed an increased cytoplasmic expression of AP-2{gamma} in breast cancer tumor samples, suggesting a functional significance of such redistribution.

Our data suggest that Wwox suppresses AP-2{gamma} transcriptional activity, as demonstrated by luciferase reporter assay (Fig. 4)Citation . Eloranta et al. (31) recently reported that AP-2{gamma} interacts with the SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and is sumoylated in vivo. By exogenously increasing cellular levels of free SUMO-1, AP-2{gamma} transcriptional activity was suppressed. Because sumoylation is known to alter the subcellular localization of many target proteins such as PML (32) and p73 (33) , Eloranta et al. (31) suggested that suppression of AP-2{gamma} transactivation function after sumoylation is due to its localization into an inactive subcellular compartment. Similarly, our findings suggest that the reduced AP-2{gamma} transcriptional activity is likely to be due to its cytoplasmic colocalization with Wwox.

The function of AP-2{gamma} transcription factor in tumorigenesis is intriguing. AP-2 genes have been shown to regulate proliferation (reviewed in ref. 20 ). AP-2{gamma} null mice displayed an embryonic lethal phenotype due to the decreased proliferation of placental cells (34) . In addition, AP-2{gamma} stimulates proliferation and apoptosis and impairs differentiation in a transgenic mouse model (35) . Interestingly, the ERBB2 gene, a molecule known for its oncogenic potential, is a direct transcriptional target of AP-2{gamma} (23 , 24) . Indeed, in AP-2{gamma} transgenic mammary gland, the expression of ErbB2 protein is up-regulated (35) . Altogether, this implies a role of AP-2{gamma} transcription factor in the maintenance of a proliferative and undifferentiated state of cells, characteristics not only important during embryonic development but also in tumorigenesis. Our results suggest that by sequestering AP-2{gamma} in the cytoplasm, Wwox suppresses its transactivating and, therefore, oncogenic activity.

The function of AP-2{alpha} and AP-2{gamma} seems to be different in cancer. AP-2{alpha} was shown to inhibit cancer cell growth and activate p21WAF1/CIP1 expression in cell culture models (36) . In addition, AP-2{alpha} interacts with p53 and augments p53-mediated transcriptional activation (37) . On the other hand, AP-2{gamma} stimulates proliferation and apoptosis in a transgenic mouse model, although no development of mammary carcinomas in the AP-2{gamma} transgenic mice was observed. This indicates that AP-2{gamma} may be a gene involved in tumor progression rather than tumor initiation (35) . In addition, analysis of primary tumor samples revealed significant overexpression of AP-2{gamma} in 80% of breast tumors (38) , and high expression of AP-2{gamma} was correlated with low survival rate (39) . Recently, Guler et al. (27) have shown that the Wwox protein is lost or reduced in more than 60% of breast primary tumors. Therefore, it seems likely that aggressive progression of breast carcinoma needs an increase of expression of AP-2{gamma} targets either by induction of AP-2{gamma} levels or Wwox inactivation and therefore translocation of AP-2{gamma} to the nucleus. It was also shown that ectopic expression of Wwox in breast cancer cells inhibits tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo (12) . Because Wwox behaves as a tumor suppressor protein, it is therefore possible that interaction with AP-2{gamma} suppresses proliferation and thus suppresses tumorigenicity in breast cancer. Additional studies will investigate these possibilities. In summary, this study describes a possible mechanism by which Wwox suppresses tumorigenicity through down-regulation of the AP-2{gamma} transcription factor by protein–protein interaction.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: R. Aqeilan and A. Palamarchuk contributed equally to this work.

Requests for reprints: Carlo M. Croce, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 400 W. 12th Street, Weisman-435, Columbus, OH 43210. E-mail: Carlo.Croce{at}mail.tju.edu

Received 6/10/04. Revised 9/12/04. Accepted 9/21/04.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bednarek AK, Laflin KJ, Daniel RL, Liao Q, Hawkins KA, Aldaz CM WWOX, a novel WW domain-containing protein mapping to human chromosome 16q23.3–24.1, a region frequently affected in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2000;60:2140-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ried K, Finnis M, Hobson L, et al Common chromosomal fragile site FRA16D sequence: identification of the FOR gene spanning FRA16D and homozygous deletions and translocation breakpoints in cancer cells. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:1651-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Richards RI Fragile and unstable chromosomes in cancer: causes and consequences. Trends Genet 2001;17:339-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ludes-Meyers JH, Bednarek AK, Popescu NC, Bedford M, Aldaz CM WWOX, the common chromosomal fragile site, FRA16D, cancer gene. Cytogenet Genome Res 2003;100:101-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Paige AJ, Taylor KJ, Taylor C, et al WWOX: a candidate tumor suppressor gene involved in multiple tumor types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:11417-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kuroki T, Trapasso F, Shiraishi T, et al Genetic alterations of the tumor suppressor gene WWOX in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2002;62:2258-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yendamuri S, Kuroki T, Trapasso F, et al WW domain containing oxidoreductase gene expression is altered in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2003;63:878-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kuroki T, Yendamuri S, Trapasso F, et al The tumor suppressor gene WWOX at FRA16D is involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2459-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Aqeilan R, Kuroki T, Pekarsky Y, et al Loss of WWOX expression in gastric carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3053-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Huebner K, Croce CM Cancer and the FRA3B/FHIT fragile locus: it’s a HIT. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1501-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Driouch K, Prydz H, Monese R, Johansen H, Lidereau R, Frengen E Alternative transcripts of the candidate tumor suppressor gene, WWOX, are expressed at high levels in human breast tumors. Oncogene 2002;21:1832-40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Bednarek AK, Keck-Waggoner CL, Daniel RL, et al WWOX, the FRA16D gene, behaves as a suppressor of tumor growth. Cancer Res 2001;61:8068-73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ilsley JL, Sudol M, Winder SJ The WW domain: linking cell signalling to the membrane cytoskeleton. Cell Signalling 2002;14:183-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Macias MJ, Wiesner S, Sudol M WW and SH3 domains, two different scaffolds to recognize proline-rich ligands. FEBS Lett 2002;513:30-7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Kallberg Y, Oppermann U, Jornvall H, Persson B Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDRs). Eur J Biochem 2002;269:4409-17.[Medline]
  16. Oppermann U, Filling C, Hult M, et al Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR): the 2002 update. Chem Biol Interact 2003;143–4:247-53.
  17. Aqeilan RI, Pekarsky Y, Herrero JJ, et al Functional association between Wwox tumor suppressor protein and p73, a p53 homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:4401-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chang NS, Pratt N, Heath J, et al Hyaluronidase induction of a WW domain-containing oxidoreductase that enhances tumor necrosis factor cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 2001;276:3361-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chang NS, Doherty J, Ensign A JNK1 physically interacts with WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WOX1) and inhibits WOX1-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2003;278:9195-202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hilger-Eversheim K, Moser M, Schorle H, Buettner R Regulatory roles of AP-2 transcription factors in vertebrate development, apoptosis and cell-cycle control. Gene 2000;260:1-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tummala R, Romano RA, Fuchs E, Sinha S Molecular cloning and characterization of AP-2 epsilon, a fifth member of the AP-2 family. Gene 2003;321:93-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Williamson JA, Bosher JM, Skinner A, Sheer D, Williams T, Hurst HC Chromosomal mapping of the human and mouse homologues of two new members of the AP-2 family of transcription factors. Genomics 1996;35:262-4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Bosher JM, Williams T, Hurst HC The developmentally regulated transcription factor AP-2 is involved in c-erbB-2 overexpression in human mammary carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:744-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bosher JM, Totty NF, Hsuan JJ, Williams T, Hurst HC A family of AP-2 proteins regulates c-erbB-2 expression in mammary carcinoma. Oncogene 1996;13:1701-7.[Medline]
  25. deConinck EC, McPherson LA, Weigel RJ Transcriptional regulation of estrogen receptor in breast carcinomas. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:2191-6.[Abstract]
  26. McPherson LA, Baichwal VR, Weigel RJ Identification of ERF-1 as a member of the AP2 transcription factor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:4342-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Guler G, Uner A, Guler N, et al The fragile genes FHIT and WWOX are inactivated coordinately in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:1605-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hu H, Columbus J, Zhang Y, et al A map of WW domain family interactions. Proteomics 2004;4:643-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ludes-Meyers JH, Kil H, Bednarek AK, Drake J, Bedford MT, Aldaz CM WWOX binds the specific proline-rich ligand PPXY: identification of candidate interacting proteins. Oncogene 2004;23:5049-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Pellikainen J, Kataja V, Ropponen K, et al Reduced nuclear expression of transcription factor AP-2 associates with aggressive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3487-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Eloranta JJ, Hurst HC Transcription factor AP-2 interacts with the SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and is sumolated in vivo. J Biol Chem 2002;277:30798-804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Muller S, Matunis MJ, Dejean A Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J 1998;17:61-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Minty A, Dumont X, Kaghad M, Caput D Covalent modification of p73{alpha} by SUMO-1: two-hybrid screening with p73 identifies novel SUMO-1-interacting proteins and a SUMO-1 interaction motif. J Biol Chem 2000;275:36316-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Werling U, Schorle H Transcription factor gene AP-2 {gamma} essential for early murine development. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:3149-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Jager R, Werling U, Rimpf S, Jacob A, Schorle H Transcription factor AP-2{gamma} stimulates proliferation and apoptosis and impairs differentiation in a transgenic model. Mol Cancer Res 2003;1:921-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zeng YX, Somasundaram K, el-Deiry WS AP2 inhibits cancer cell growth and activates p21WAF1/CIP1 expression. Nat Genet 1997;15:78-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. McPherson LA, Loktev AV, Weigel RJ Tumor suppressor activity of AP2{alpha} mediated through a direct interaction with p53. J Biol Chem 2002;277:45028-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Turner BC, Zhang J, Gumbs AA, et al Expression of AP-2 transcription factors in human breast cancer correlates with the regulation of multiple growth factor signalling pathways. Cancer Res 1998;58:5466-72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Zhao C, Yasui K, Lee CJ, et al Elevated expression levels of NCOA3, TOP1, and TFAP2C in breast tumors as predictors of poor prognosis. Cancer 2003;98:18-23.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L.-J. Hsu, L. Schultz, Q. Hong, K. Van Moer, J. Heath, M.-Y. Li, F.-J. Lai, S.-R. Lin, M.-H. Lee, C.-P. Lo, et al.
Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Signaling via Interaction with Cell Surface Hyal-2 and Recruitment of WWOX/WOX1
J. Biol. Chem., June 5, 2009; 284(23): 16049 - 16059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C. Gourley, A. J.W. Paige, K. J. Taylor, C. Ward, B. Kuske, J. Zhang, M. Sun, S. Janczar, D. J. Harrison, M. Muir, et al.
WWOX Gene Expression Abolishes Ovarian Cancer Tumorigenicity In vivo and Decreases Attachment to Fibronectin via Integrin {alpha}3
Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 69(11): 4835 - 4842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
R. I. Aqeilan, J. P. Hagan, A. de Bruin, M. Rawahneh, Z. Salah, E. Gaudio, H. Siddiqui, S. Volinia, H. Alder, J. B. Lian, et al.
Targeted Ablation of the WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase Tumor Suppressor Leads to Impaired Steroidogenesis
Endocrinology, March 1, 2009; 150(3): 1530 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. I. Aqeilan, M. Q. Hassan, A. de Bruin, J. P. Hagan, S. Volinia, T. Palumbo, S. Hussain, S.-H. Lee, T. Gaur, G. S. Stein, et al.
The WWOX Tumor Suppressor Is Essential for Postnatal Survival and Normal Bone Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21629 - 21639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Guler, D. Iliopoulos, N. Guler, C. Himmetoglu, M. Hayran, and K. Huebner
Wwox and Ap2{gamma} Expression Levels Predict Tamoxifen Response
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6115 - 6121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
R. I. Aqeilan, V. Donati, E. Gaudio, M. S. Nicoloso, M. Sundvall, A. Korhonen, J. Lundin, J. Isola, M. Sudol, H. Joensuu, et al.
Association of Wwox with ErbB4 in Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9330 - 9336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
H. R. Qin, D. Iliopoulos, T. Nakamura, S. Costinean, S. Volinia, T. Druck, J. Sun, H. Okumura, and K. Huebner
Wwox Suppresses Prostate Cancer Cell Growth through Modulation of ErbB2-Mediated Androgen Receptor Signaling
Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 5(9): 957 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. I. Aqeilan, F. Trapasso, S. Hussain, S. Costinean, D. Marshall, Y. Pekarsky, J. P. Hagan, N. Zanesi, M. Kaou, G. S. Stein, et al.
Targeted deletion of Wwox reveals a tumor suppressor function
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3949 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Donati, G. Fontanini, M. Dell'Omodarme, M. C. Prati, S. Nuti, M. Lucchi, A. Mussi, M. Fabbri, F. Basolo, C. M. Croce, et al.
WWOX Expression in Different Histologic Types and Subtypes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 13(3): 884 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Iliopoulos, M. Fabbri, T. Druck, H. R. Qin, S.-Y. Han, and K. Huebner
Inhibition of Breast Cancer Cell Growth In vitro and In vivo: Effect of Restoration of Wwox Expression
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
E. Gaudio, A. Palamarchuk, T. Palumbo, F. Trapasso, Y. Pekarsky, C. M. Croce, and R. I. Aqeilan
Physical Association with WWOX Suppresses c-Jun Transcriptional Activity
Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11585 - 11589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Ding, C. Fan, J. Zhou, Y. Zhong, R. Liu, K. Ren, X. Hu, C. Luo, S. Xiao, Y. Wang, et al.
GAS41 interacts with transcription factor AP-2beta and stimulates AP-2beta-mediated transactivation.
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(9): 2570 - 2578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N.-S. Chang, J. Doherty, A. Ensign, L. Schultz, L.-J. Hsu, and Q. Hong
WOX1 Is Essential for Tumor Necrosis Factor-, UV Light-, Staurosporine-, and p53-mediated Cell Death, and Its Tyrosine 33-phosphorylated Form Binds and Stabilizes Serine 46-phosphorylated p53
J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 43100 - 43108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Fabbri, D. Iliopoulos, F. Trapasso, R. I. Aqeilan, A. Cimmino, N. Zanesi, S. Yendamuri, S.-Y. Han, D. Amadori, K. Huebner, et al.
WWOX gene restoration prevents lung cancer growth in vitro and in vivo
PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15611 - 15616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
R. I. Aqeilan, V. Donati, A. Palamarchuk, F. Trapasso, M. Kaou, Y. Pekarsky, M. Sudol, and C. M. Croce
WW Domain-Containing Proteins, WWOX and YAP, Compete for Interaction with ErbB-4 and Modulate Its Transcriptional Function
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6764 - 6772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Egener, E. Roulet, M. Zehnder, P. Bucher, and N. Mermod
Proof of concept for microarray-based detection of DNA-binding oncogenes in cell extracts
Nucleic Acids Res., May 12, 2005; 33(8): e79 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aqeilan, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Croce, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aqeilan, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Croce, C. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online